Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 2 Feb 2021 at 21:00:52 (UTC)
Reason
Quality lead image. Bernina Express is a four-hour train journey (and tourist attraction) in the
Alps connecting
Chur in Switzerland to
Tirano in Italy. The tracks were laid around 1910 and are the
fifth highest in Europe at 2253 meters. The trip crosses 196 bridges and 55 tunnels. The route is designated a
World Heritage Site. In this photo the train is headed southbound passing by
Lago Bianco reservoir. Depicted are two
Rhaetian RailwayABe 4/4 III locomotives (each with a 28 passenger capacity), six passenger cars, and
overhead electric lines.
Bernina Pass is to the right and behind the foreground hill. FP on Commons.
Support as nominator –
Bammesk (
talk) 21:00, 23 January 2021 (UTC)reply
Support --
Wow (
talk) 04:52, 24 January 2021 (UTC)reply
Oppose personally I like the colors of the second image better; it is the lead image in
Bernina railway. (
t ·
c) buidhe 05:18, 24 January 2021 (UTC)reply
I made the second image an Alternate. It is an older photo from 2010. The two photos share the same
locomotive #51 so I think red is the more recent color scheme. The original has more pixels and more detail when enlarged to the same magnification.
Bammesk (
talk) 06:18, 24 January 2021 (UTC)reply
Comment I also lean to the alt, but unfortunately it's not current. If neither promoted here, do nominate at Portal:Trains! --
Janke |
Talk 10:45, 24 January 2021 (UTC)reply
Support, prefer original - either gives a good impression of the line, but I think the original has more natural colours, better resolution and is a more recent shot.
TSP (
talk) 12:50, 29 January 2021 (UTC)reply
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 5 Feb 2021 at 03:56:32 (UTC)
Reason
Found this as Featured Media at Commons. Another film part of the
National Film Registry, the registry said that The Iron Horse "introduced to American and world audiences a reverential, elegiac mythology that has influenced many subsequent Westerns." Seems to be a very important film in its genre.
Support as nominator –
GamerPro64 03:56, 26 January 2021 (UTC)reply
Support in principle, but those 2007 music credits at the end should really be removed, since the music is not included in the file, and would be copyvio if it were... --
Janke |
Talk 12:25, 26 January 2021 (UTC)reply
Support as nominator –
Andrei (
talk) 14:49, 29 January 2021 (UTC)reply
Support – Interesting (self-) portrait of an artist not widely known in the West. Good detail. (Could it be lightened a bit without upsetting the cognoscenti?) –
Sca (
talk) 15:11, 29 January 2021 (UTC)reply
I would rather not unless there are other opinions. Especially minding the fact that it was featured on commons as it is (I know that wiki and commons are different, but it might upset 18 people there). --
Andrei (
talk) 19:26, 29 January 2021 (UTC)reply
Comment. It's a nice picture, but I miss a little bit that the image it replaced shows what these things look like when sliced through. —
David Eppstein (
talk) 17:41, 30 January 2021 (UTC)reply
Support – high quality. I added the previous photo (the sliced version) to the gallery; it was reverted though.
Bammesk (
talk) 19:44, 30 January 2021 (UTC)reply
Support. --
Janke |
Talk 19:19, 2 February 2021 (UTC)reply
Comment. I have no concerns about image quality but it's used in its article in the middle of what is effectively a large image gallery, rather than being the lead image or being called out in the text as illustrating an important aspect of the subject. Is there enough EV? —
David Eppstein (
talk) 20:33, 2 February 2021 (UTC)reply
The physical attributes of the male are in the
description section, near the image on my display (black striped feathers, brown head, white-striped neck, black tail, blue bill, white breast, yellow vent). Ref 12 (at the end of the paragraph) describes the forward swimming posture, so I
added a sentence on that. About lead position or placement: being a lead image isn't a requirement, or always best or possible (juvenile, breeding, etc). Repositioning images in established articles can be controversial. This is a featured article, so I think some thought has gone into the depictions and article watchers would take care of repositioning and improvements if/when necessaey. On a sidenote, I think this image meets the "eye-catching" part of the instructions on top of
this page, which IMO is a bonus.
Bammesk (
talk) 02:09, 3 February 2021 (UTC)reply
Support OK to have the pair as the lead image.
Charlesjsharp (
talk) 18:33, 4 February 2021 (UTC)reply
Support -- GeraldWL 10:30, 5 February 2021 (UTC)reply
Promoted File:Male northern pintail at Llano Seco.jpg --
ArmbrustTheHomunculus 00:01, 10 February 2021 (UTC)reply
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 10 Feb 2021 at 07:03:28 (UTC)
Reason
High-quality portrait of esports competitor
MKLeo. His expression, outfit, and other facial features gives an insight into the intensity of this subculture that cannot be conveyed through text.
Support - acceptable quality, I like the negative space in the composition, the photo sparked my interest to read the
bio.--
Commander Keane (
talk) 06:35, 7 February 2021 (UTC)reply
Oppose A bit too esoteric for non-experts (and so is the article... ;-), also not very captivating visually. --
Janke |
Talk 15:04, 31 January 2021 (UTC)reply
Oppose – Ditto. Diagram is not intelligible to most readers. –
Sca (
talk) 13:52, 2 February 2021 (UTC)reply
Comment. I disagree with the comments suggesting that technical illustrations are ineligible for FPC, but I agree with the comment that this is "not very captivating visually". And although the visual part of the illustration does a fine job of illustrating the general concept of an exact sequence, the textual part is more or less illegible at normal image viewing sizes. —
David Eppstein (
talk) 20:27, 2 February 2021 (UTC)reply
"Ineligible" - who said that? (Sca said "intelligible", you say "illegible"... Dang this discombobulating English language! ;-) --
Janke |
Talk 08:10, 3 February 2021 (UTC)reply
You. You said "too esoteric for non-experts (and so is the article... ;-)" in a way that made those attributes sound like reasons not to feature this image. Are esoteric subjects not allowed here? (Also, to mathematicians, exact sequences are a very basic and important topic.) —
David Eppstein (
talk) 08:26, 3 February 2021 (UTC)reply
I stand by what I said, but that does not make esoteric images generally ineligible. In fact, they may be very interesting, drawing the viewer to the article. Not in this case though, IMHO. --
Janke |
Talk 15:23, 8 February 2021 (UTC)reply
Ahem. I said "not intelligible to most readers," and I still say that. –
Sca (
talk) 15:16, 3 February 2021 (UTC)reply
Comment – I agree with David. Looking at the category
here, the last addition was 8 years ago!, unfortunately.
Bammesk (
talk) 02:41, 3 February 2021 (UTC)reply
That is not unmeaningless. –
Sca (
talk) 15:20, 3 February 2021 (UTC)reply
If you're looking for more candidates, I have many many mathematics illustrations at
Commons:User:David_Eppstein/Gallery. Most are very simple line art that I do not think would pass muster at FPC (the simplicity is intentional, as busier images tend to be less clear at illustrating the mathematics they are intended to illustrate) but a few go beyond that and might be worth trying. Part of the charm of the nomination here is that it provides a memorable and intuition-building 3d picture of an abstract construction that is not particularly geometric or 3-dimensional. But that charm is going to be lost on people who aren't already familiar with the subject, without the text it would again be probably too simple and diagrammatic as an image to pass, and with the text it's illegible. —
David Eppstein (
talk) 08:42, 3 February 2021 (UTC)reply
Comment I've nothing against esoteric pictures becoming Featured, in principle, and an image can be visually striking even if the mathematics behind it is advanced material. However, I'm not sold on this particular instance. Particularly within the inner ovals, the text is both small and crowded.
XOR'easter (
talk) 22:12, 3 February 2021 (UTC)reply
Oppose. Per Mr. Sharp. --
Gnosis (
talk) 00:27, 7 February 2021 (UTC)reply
Oppose - Maybe it's just me, but I am hurt by the white stuff above... The grayscale intention is spot-on, but the result is over...contrasted. I don't see any EV. GeraldWL 10:47, 9 February 2021 (UTC)reply
Oppose - Just a snaphot, no pizzazz... --
Janke |
Talk 15:18, 8 February 2021 (UTC)reply
Janke, I don't understand... don't snapshots have the opportunity to show some pizzazz, and to be valid FPCs? I think that this picture represents aviation broadly: a silent, calming field of open skies to explore. Sure it's something everyone can take, but... isn't that what all pics have in common? GeraldWL 01:57, 9 February 2021 (UTC)reply
Well, criterion #3/2 asks for a photo to be "compelling, making the viewer want to know more" - I see none of that in this photo, sorry. --
Janke |
Talk 10:11, 9 February 2021 (UTC)reply
Support as nominator –
MER-C 17:26, 6 February 2021 (UTC)reply
Comment – I want to support, it is well done, sharp etc. But looking at google images, I am not sure this is a good/typical representation of this mushroom?
Bammesk (
talk) 18:03, 7 February 2021 (UTC)reply
Note: If you are unsure about the color. The mushroom has passed its peak. This can be seen in the discolored edges and the weathered appearance. The fungus was in the shade under pine trees. Where sheep walk in the summer.--
Famberhorst (
talk) 17:38, 9 February 2021 (UTC)reply
Support Thank you for nominating my photo.--
Famberhorst (
talk) 17:38, 9 February 2021 (UTC)reply
Support. Eye-catching. I think this has enough EV despite not being the lead image, because for this type of subject we need images of all the major stages and it's the main image for its stage. —
David Eppstein (
talk) 19:36, 13 February 2021 (UTC)reply
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 16 Feb 2021 at 21:01:25 (UTC)
Reason
Good illustration of
skew lines. As described in the article, this depiction illustrates the formation of
hyperboloids via the revolution of skew lines. I think a good rule of thumb for math related FPs is "being eye-catching to the point where users will want to read its accompanying article", as suggested on top of
this page. This is a good example of it.
Support as nominator –
Bammesk (
talk) 21:01, 6 February 2021 (UTC)reply
Support as image creator. A note re image resolution: as a synthetic image, this could in principle be re-rendered to any higher resolution using the original source, linked from the image page. —
David Eppstein (
talk) 21:12, 6 February 2021 (UTC)reply
Support Should it be noted that there are 3 sets of skew lines (the different colours)? cmɢʟee⎆
τaʟκ 01:48, 16 February 2021 (UTC)reply
There's also a fourth color of line, the white one in the center, part of the fibration of the space but not belonging to any of the hyperboloids. —
David Eppstein (
talk) 03:08, 16 February 2021 (UTC)reply
It lacks illustrative human interest. --
Gnosis (
talk) 20:32, 7 February 2021 (UTC)reply
Given your other two comments (fear that the police look like "bad guys" and subsequent defense of the police warning that "criminals will eat us alive,"), along with your deceptive reformatting of comments [2], I'm not willing to assume that this is a good-faith criticism of the photograph itself, as I am with
Sca (who you copied word-for-word).
AllegedlyHuman (
talk) 20:42, 7 February 2021 (UTC)reply
If you get robbed, you run to the police! Without them around, criminals eat us alive. --
Gnosis (
talk) 20:32, 7 February 2021 (UTC)reply
Comment – Since they're all in riot gear that conceals their faces, this snap lacks illustrative human interest. –
Sca (
talk) 13:57, 7 February 2021 (UTC)reply
Oppose Good for the article, but not up to FP standards - just a haphazardly framed snapshot. --
Janke |
Talk 15:13, 8 February 2021 (UTC)reply
Weak oppose. Given what happened to Gnosis, I will not have my oppose on the basis of "it makes the police look bad", although I have that same opinion. I just don't think it represents the police well, and it is not a broad portrayal of the protests. It makes it as if the entire impact of the protests were caused by police (seeing how the guards raid the entire frame), when it obv isn't the case. It does look good tho IMO. GeraldWL 16:28, 8 February 2021 (UTC)reply
Don't think I've ever heard reasoning for an FP oppose vote include the phrase "It does look good, though."
AllegedlyHuman (
talk) 17:41, 14 February 2021 (UTC)reply
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 19 Feb 2021 at 07:43:19 (UTC)
Reason
Seems high-q enough, for a historical image. EV, as it depicts where it crashed; kinda makes the viewer guess how it crashed. The color and angle accurately depicts how depressing a crash can be.
Support as nominator – GeraldWL 07:43, 9 February 2021 (UTC)reply
Oppose Just looks like a trash heap, since there are no clearly identifiable plane parts in the photo. Thus fails criterion #3/2. --
Janke |
Talk 10:08, 9 February 2021 (UTC)reply
Oppose – Ditto. Accessible visual information lacking. –
Sca (
talk) 14:46, 9 February 2021 (UTC)reply
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 19 Feb 2021 at 10:34:59 (UTC)
Reason
Yeah yeah, I know, "Why are you still nominating stuff? You lost the other 2!" I had no idea of criterion 3#2: "It illustrates the subject in a compelling way, making the viewer want to know more." I think that this image meets that criteria well. It also has significant EV, and looks awesome technically. No JEPG or noise as far as I can zoom.
Support as nominator – GeraldWL 10:34, 9 February 2021 (UTC)reply
Comment – How does this pic convey the story of the
737-Max? –
Sca (
talk) 14:43, 9 February 2021 (UTC)reply
Sca, this does not have to convey the story of the groundings. It shows just how glorious the plane looks like to the world before
the crash occurred. Striking wings and dynamic shape. Retrospectively, it conveys just how greedy Boeing is; seeing the image makes you cling between liking it or hating it. GeraldWL 14:54, 9 February 2021 (UTC)reply
Sca, it has to? The criteria merely states "It illustrates the subject in a compelling way", and I think this does. Showing the whole picture, I think would make it dull, as the whole body is predictable, looking at the previous 737s. This image shows the dynamic side of the 737, making it original. GeraldWL 15:19, 10 February 2021 (UTC)reply
'Scimitar' (a silly designation) appears to be growing out of the forward crew cabin (or cockpit). –
Sca (
talk) 14:45, 11 February 2021 (UTC)reply
PS: It's really not necessary to ping me every time you post. –
Sca (
talk) 14:45, 11 February 2021 (UTC)reply
Well that's because of the angle it is shot. It's three dimensional world, anyone who has seen airplane photos can know that it's not growing out of the cabin.
Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Vehicles/Air has similar angles. GeraldWL 18:27, 11 February 2021 (UTC)reply
Yes, we all knew that, but it makes for an awkward and odd composition. –
Sca (
talk) 20:08, 11 February 2021 (UTC)reply
Oppose Arty, but with very little EV
Nick-D (
talk) 22:28, 12 February 2021 (UTC)reply
Comment. It is actually a pretty good illustration of the split-tip winglet, although I could quibble that the alignment of the winglet edge with the plane's nose makes it difficult to understand the image. But as the discussion above illustrates, its purpose as an illustration of this specific winglet rather than as a general illustration of the whole plane is not obvious from its current usage. We don't currently have a separate article on the split-tip winglet; it is just a paragraph in the more general winglet article. Is there enough EV for this subtopic? —
David Eppstein (
talk) 19:32, 13 February 2021 (UTC)reply
David Epstein, one could argue that it serves little EV, but I think it has a significant amount. In the wingtip device article, it illustrates the split-tip type, and in the MAX article, it gives a closer look at the device. It also shows how cool this aircraft was with the split-tip to everyone when it first launched: amazing, striking. GeraldWL 02:01, 14 February 2021 (UTC)reply
Oppose - Only Wingtip highlighted in the picture. The engine & fuselage is cropped off. A different color detail on wingtip bringing its design to focus might clear voting. --
Kalyan (
talk) 03:54, 18 February 2021 (UTC)reply
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 23 Feb 2021 at 17:46:59 (UTC)
Reason
This 25 second animation enhances the article, it helps readers understand the concept by adding an interesting visualization of the textual descriptions. It also meets: "being eye-catching to the point where users will want to read its accompanying article", as stated on top of this page.
Support as nominator –
Bammesk (
talk) 17:46, 13 February 2021 (UTC)reply
Support. Exhibits the main qualitative features of its topic (the changes in phase from randomness, to patches of color, to spirals, to the fastest spirals winning out over the slower ones). It's not the lead image of its article (a static image of a 1d cca) but still features prominently and provides significant information different from what's in the lead. And, importantly for FP on a technical topic, it's eye-catching. This tends to lead to FPs that are more focused around visual topics like fractals and cellular automata and less around important mathematics (much like our FPs in biology are focused on charismatic fauna and less on important theoretical aspects of biology), but I think cyclic CAs are still significant enough to bring the necessary EV. —
David Eppstein (
talk) 19:23, 13 February 2021 (UTC)reply
Comment The final cycle goes on too long. --
Janke |
Talk 12:49, 14 February 2021 (UTC)reply
It doesn't really stabilize into a cycle (it's somewhat similar to a
moiré pattern). It's necessary to show the ongoing variations, for example new vertical ridges develop at the bottom-right and then at the bottom-left over the last 10 seconds.
Bammesk (
talk) 16:40, 14 February 2021 (UTC)reply
Comment – Yikes! Let me out of here! –
Sca (
talk) 14:18, 14 February 2021 (UTC)reply
This horrified reaction to even the most eye-catching and visually appealing and not-very-technical of mathematics images, and the reaction below that we must compromise the mathematical meaning of the image to make it even more eye-catching, is not making me optimistic about the ability of FPC to cover anything more than cute fuzzy animals and Kodak-spot tourist viewpoints. Is that really what we want when we clamor that en-FPC is different than commons-FPC because encyclopedic value? —
David Eppstein (
talk) 20:00, 21 February 2021 (UTC)reply
I agree. We are here to pick the best images, meaning the best in the context of enhancing an article. We aren't here to pick eye-pleasing images. FP criteria says: "A featured picture is not always required to be aesthetically pleasing". In evaluating noms like the one here, a large measure of what is (or isn't) best has to do with the consensus of article editors (i.e. the choices they have made and article stability). The second half of this animation relates to the article text, which says: "The third stage ... The demons with shorter cycles consume demons with longer cycles". Looking at other FPs in the
math category, this image may pass on renomination.
Bammesk (
talk) 03:22, 23 February 2021 (UTC)reply
Comment Fine as a thumbnail but not an animation on an article proper (saturated colours are very distracting). Also agree that the final cycle is too long (developing ridges not obvious unless pointed out). cmɢʟee⎆
τaʟκ 01:45, 16 February 2021 (UTC)reply
It's more important for the topic that we show the full process of changes, including the last part that looks slower, than that we avoid boring viewers with attention spans of a few seconds. —
David Eppstein (
talk) 18:41, 16 February 2021 (UTC)reply
The more obvious development is the slow disappearance of the very first vortex (at middle-left). There is a shorter version of this animation:
here. I agree with the article editors that the longer version (the nom version) is the more appropriate one to use. The simulation starts with noise, and the longer term instability (albeit not obvious, but a consequence of the initial noise) is a relevant part of the animation.
Bammesk (
talk) 02:33, 17 February 2021 (UTC)reply
Support. --
Janke |
Talk 11:25, 15 February 2021 (UTC)reply
Weak Support There are a couple of spots where the pic is completely overblown (above the mountain on the left; left edge of the center cloud). If it can be dialed back, will withdraw my adjective. Very interesting composition otherwise though it might not have a large EV. --
Kalyan (
talk) 03:59, 18 February 2021 (UTC)reply
Thanks, Kalyan, for your review. Please, could you specify, what kind of spots do you see in this area, dust spots, clouds, or else? --
Basile Morin (
talk) 04:33, 18 February 2021 (UTC)reply
Look at the places (=spots) where the RGB values max out, they are "blown", i.e. overexposed. Unavoidable in this case, except by shooting
HDRI. --
Janke |
Talk 17:56, 18 February 2021 (UTC)reply
Done@
Vimalkalyan:, I shot this landscape at different exposures, so I could use an other frame without blown highlights to improve this corner. Thanks for your feedback, and thank you
Janke too for the explanation. --
Basile Morin (
talk) 00:21, 19 February 2021 (UTC)reply
Full Support & hence removed the objection. --
Kalyan (
talk) 01:16, 19 February 2021 (UTC)reply
Promoted File:Karst peaks with sea of clouds at sunrise, South view from the top of Mount Nam Xay, Vang Vieng, Laos.jpg --
ArmbrustTheHomunculus 23:33, 23 February 2021 (UTC)reply
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 23 Feb 2021 at 15:32:12 (UTC)
Reason
A rare image of Indonesia's internal minister. Tito rarely uses this uniform as a minister, so it should also increase its value. The author of this image,
admitted here that he is one of Tito's adjutant. I've also never seen this image being used anywhere except Wikipedia, so copyright also check out. I have added some notes for people who want to check the meaning of each badge.
Comment – Official photo of govt. official with many medals. EV? –
Sca (
talk) 13:49, 16 February 2021 (UTC)reply
@
Sca: Sorry? I am new to FPC. I understand what EV means, but why are you asking about it? Please elaborate. For the medals, I think we have FPs with
many more medals than to this person. Regards,
Jeromi Mikhael 04:38, 17 February 2021 (UTC)reply
OK. I don't see this official photo as providing viewers with much useful visual information. –
Sca (
talk) 13:58, 17 February 2021 (UTC)reply
Support. Good image quality, striking in form, and as the only one on its article for this stage, enough EV. —
David Eppstein (
talk) 04:24, 14 February 2021 (UTC)reply
Comment – Who was Durga Thapa? What's
'iconic' about this image? –
Sca (
talk) 16:03, 13 February 2021 (UTC)reply
Oppose - Had to google quite a bit to find out. Definitely not an iconic person, just a civil servant. --
Janke |
Talk 17:31, 13 February 2021 (UTC)reply
Oppose Not so much iconic! --
Gnosis (
talk) 00:28, 14 February 2021 (UTC)reply
@
Janke and
Sca: As Nepali Times puts it: Readers will be familiar with Durga Thapa because of the iconic picture of her taken by Min Ratna Bajracharya during the 1990 People's Movement. She is the student who leapt into the air with a double victory sign at a democracy rally at Asan. Sixteen years later, the same photographer snapped a photo of her during the April Uprising as she chanted pro-democracy slogans on the streets. At 39 and the mother of a young son, Durga has been a customs officer at the Tatopani Checkpoint on the Chinese border for the past year. Having been a social worker with charities like Sahara Group, activism comes easy to Durga.Source. ~~
CAPTAIN MEDUSAtalk 12:05, 14 February 2021 (UTC)reply
SupportThis article linked in the image source on Commons makes it clear that the photo is iconic in Nepal, even if the individual is otherwise low-profile. The photo is high quality, has a clear description, and is properly used in its article.
Vahurzpu (
talk) 08:07, 14 February 2021 (UTC)reply
Support Iconic image in the place of origin. Counts as a historical image, so I won't judge the image details. Regards,
Jeromi Mikhael 12:24, 14 February 2021 (UTC)reply
Iconic is one of the two most overused words in the English language. –
Sca (
talk) 14:20, 14 February 2021 (UTC)reply
Reliable sources said that it's iconic. We worship RS here, so....that checks out. Regards,
Jeromi Mikhael 23:49, 14 February 2021 (UTC)reply
Puzzling
post today. –
Sca (
talk) 14:30, 22 February 2021 (UTC)reply
Oppose – Poor composition due to crowd clutter, lack of visual emphasis on subject person; lack of significance beyond "the local region." –
Sca (
talk) 14:40, 18 February 2021 (UTC)reply
@
Sca: The photo was also published on the cover page of the book named "
Dawn of Democracy" in 1991. IMO for this picture, we should look at the 'moment' which is also an important key of photography except for the clear, dynamic, and distinct picture. For a Nepalese photographer, it was rare to have a panoramic or high digital camera at that time in
90's. Thanks--
Biplab Anand(Talk) 03:54, 19 February 2021 (UTC)reply
Support - because of its value for the place of origin. --
Nirmal Dulal (
talk) 04:49, 19 February 2021 (UTC)reply
Support - because of its value for the place of origin.
पर्वत सुबेदी (
talk) 07:06, 21 February 2021 (UTC)reply
Comment - is it possible that we see a lot of solicited support votes here? That would be WP:VOTESTACKING... --
Janke |
Talk 17:18, 21 February 2021 (UTC)reply
User पर्वत सुबेदी has been inactive for several years. –
Sca (
talk) 14:16, 22 February 2021 (UTC)reply
That confirms stacking theory. --
Janke |
Talk 16:41, 22 February 2021 (UTC)reply
Oppose - definitely could do with a touch-up to remove all the weird lines everywhere. Doesn't meet FP? even if composition was disregarded.
MER-C 13:41, 22 February 2021 (UTC)reply
Those are dust and scratches on the negative. Would need retouching. --
Janke |
Talk 16:44, 22 February 2021 (UTC)reply