The prokaryotic cytoskeleton is the collective name for all structural
filaments in
prokaryotes. It was once thought that prokaryotic cells did not possess
cytoskeletons, but advances in visualization technology and structure determination led to the discovery of filaments in these cells in the early 1990s.[2] Not only have
analogues for all major cytoskeletal proteins in
eukaryotes been found in prokaryotes, cytoskeletal proteins with no known eukaryotic
homologues have also been discovered.[3][4][5][6] Cytoskeletal elements play essential roles in
cell division, protection, shape determination, and polarity determination in various prokaryotes.[7][8]
FtsZ, the first identified prokaryotic cytoskeletal element, forms a filamentous ring structure located in the middle of the cell called the Z-ring that constricts during
cell division, similar to the
actin-myosin contractile ring in eukaryotes.[2] The Z-ring is a highly dynamic structure that consists of numerous bundles of protofilaments that extend and shrink, although the mechanism behind Z-ring contraction and the number of protofilaments involved are unclear.[1] FtsZ acts as an organizer protein and is required for cell division. It is the first component of the
septum during
cytokinesis, and it recruits all other known cell division proteins to the division site.[9]
Despite this functional similarity to
actin, FtsZ is homologous to eukaryal
tubulin. Although comparison of the
primary structures of FtsZ and tubulin reveal a weak relationship, their 3-dimensional structures are remarkably similar. Furthermore, like tubulin,
monomeric FtsZ is bound to
GTP and polymerizes with other FtsZ monomers with the hydrolysis of GTP in a mechanism similar to
tubulin dimerization.[10] Since FtsZ is essential for cell division in bacteria, this protein is a target for the design of new
antibiotics.[11]
There currently exist several models and mechanisms that regulate Z-ring formation, but these mechanisms depend on the species. Several rod shaped species, including Escherichia coli and Caulobacter crescentus, use one or more inhibitors of FtsZ assembly that form a bipolar gradient in the cell, enhancing polymerization of FtsZ at the cell center.[12] One of these gradient-forming systems consists of MinCDE proteins (see below).
MreB is a bacterial protein believed to be homologous to eukaryal
actin. MreB and actin have a weak
primary structure match, but are very similar in terms of 3-D structure and filament polymerization.
Almost all non-spherical bacteria rely on MreB to determine their shape. MreB assembles into a helical network of filamentous structures just under the
cytoplasmic membrane, covering the whole length of the cell.[13] MreB determines cell shape by mediating the position and activity of enzymes that synthesize
peptidoglycan and by acting as a rigid filament under the cell membrane that exerts outward pressure to sculpt and bolster the cell.[1] MreB condenses from its normal helical network and forms a tight ring at the
septum in Caulobacter crescentus right before cell division, a mechanism that is believed to help locate its off-center septum.[14] MreB is also important for polarity determination in polar bacteria, as it is responsible for the correct positioning of at least four different polar proteins in C. crescentus.[14]
ParM is a cytoskeletal element that possesses a similar structure to
actin, although it behaves functionally like
tubulin. Further, it polymerizes bidirectionally and it exhibits
dynamic instability, which are both behaviors characteristic of tubulin polymerization.[4][15] It forms a system with ParR and parC that is responsible for
R1 plasmid separation. ParM affixes to ParR, a
DNA-binding protein that specifically binds to 10 direct repeats in the parC region on the R1 plasmid. This binding occurs on both ends of the ParM filament. This filament is then extended, separating the plasmids.[16] The system is analogous to eukaryotic chromosome segregation as ParM acts like eukaryotic
tubulin in the
mitotic spindle, ParR acts like the
kinetochore complex, and parC acts like the
centromere of the
chromosome.[17]
F plasmid segregation occurs in a similar system where SopA acts as the cytoskeletal filament and SopB binds to the sopC sequence in the F plasmid, like the
kinetochore and
centromere respectively.[17] Lately an actin-like ParM homolog has been found in a
gram-positive bacterium Bacillus thuringiensis, which assembles into a microtubule-like structure and is involved in
plasmid segregation.[18]
Archaeal actin
Crenactin is an actin homologue unique to the archaeal kingdom Thermoproteota (formerly Crenarchaeota) that has been found in the orders Thermoproteales and Candidatus Korarchaeum.[19] At the time of its discovery in 2009, it has the highest sequence similarity to eukaryotic actins of any known actin homologue.[20] Crenactin has been well characterized in Pyryobaculum calidifontis (A3MWN5) and shown to have high specificity for ATP and GTP.[19] Species containing crenactin are all rod or needle shaped. In P. calidifontis, crenactin has been shown to form helical structures that span the length of the cell, suggesting a role for crenactin in shape determination similar to that of MreB in other prokaryotes.[19][21]
Even closer to the eukaryotic actin system is found in the proposed superphylum of
Asgardarchaeota. They use primitive versions of
profilin,
gelsolin, and
cofilin to regulate the cytoskeleton.[22]
Crescentin (encoded by creS gene) is an analogue of eukaryotic
intermediate filaments (IFs). Unlike the other analogous relationships discussed here, crescentin has a rather large primary homology with IF proteins in addition to three-dimensional similarity - the sequence of creS has a 25% identity match and 40% similarity to
cytokeratin 19 and a 24% identity match and 40% similarity to
nuclear lamin A. Furthermore, crescentin filaments are roughly 10 nm in diameter and thus fall within diameter range for eukaryal IFs (8-15 nm).[23] Crescentin forms a continuous filament from pole to pole alongside the inner, concave side of the crescent-shaped bacterium Caulobacter crescentus. Both MreB and crescentin are necessary for C. crescentus to exist in its characteristic shape; it is believed that MreB molds the cell into a rod shape and crescentin bends this shape into a crescent.[1]
The MinCDE system is a filament system that properly positions the
septum in the middle of the cell in Escherichia coli. According to Shih et al., MinC inhibits the formation of the septum by prohibiting the polymerization of the Z-ring. MinC, MinD, and MinE form a helix structure that winds around the cell and is bound to the membrane by MinD. The MinCDE helix occupies a pole and terminates in a filamentous structure called the E-ring made of MinE at the middle-most edge of the polar zone. From this configuration, the E-ring will contract and move toward that pole, disassembling the MinCDE helix as it moves along. Concomitantly, the disassembled fragments will reassemble at the opposite polar end, reforming the MinCDE coil on the opposite pole while the current MinCDE helix is broken down. This process then repeats, with the MinCDE helix oscillating from pole to pole. This oscillation occurs repeatedly during the cell cycle, thereby keeping MinC (and its septum inhibiting effect) at a lower time-averaged concentration at the middle of the cell than at the ends of the cell.[24]
The dynamic behavior of the Min proteins has been reconstituted in vitro using an artificial lipid bilayer as mimic for the cell membrane. MinE and MinD self-organized into parallel and spiral protein waves by a reaction-diffusion like mechanism.[25]
Bactofilin
Bactofilin (
InterPro: IPR007607) is a β-helical cytoskeletal element that forms filaments throughout the cells of the
rod-shaped proteobacterium Myxococcus xanthus.[26] The bactofilin protein, BacM, is required for proper cell shape maintenance and cell wall integrity. M. xanthus cells lacking BacM have a deformed morphology characterized by a bent cell body, and bacM mutants have decreased resistance to antibiotics targeting the bacterial cell wall. M. xanthus BacM protein is cleaved from its full-length form to allow polymerization. Bactofilins have been implicated in cell shape regulation in other bacteria, including curvature of Proteus mirabilis cells,[27] stalk formation by Caulobacter crescentus,[28] and helical shape of Helicobacter pylori.[29]
CfpA
Within the phylum
Spirochaetes, a number of species share a filamentous cytoplasmic ribbon structure formed by individual filaments, composed of the coiled-coil protein CfpA (Cytoplasmic filament protein A, Q56336), linked together by bridging components and by anchors to the inner membrane.[30][31] While present in genera Treponema, Spirochaeta, Pillotina, Leptonema, Hollandina and Diplocalyx, they are however, absent in some species as per the example of Treponema primitia.[32][33][34][35] With a cross-section dimension of 5 x 6 nm (horizontal/vertical) they fall within diameter range of eukaryal intermediate filaments (IFs) (8-15 nm). Treponema denticola cells lacking the CfpA protein form long concatenated cells with a chromosomal DNA segregation defect, a phenotype also affecting the pathogenicity of this organism.[36][37] The absence of another cell ultrastructure, the periplasmic flagella filament bundle, do not alter the structure of the cytoplasmic ribbon.[38]
^Popp D, Narita A, Ghoshdastider U, Maeda K, Maéda Y, Oda T, Fujisawa T, Onishi H, Ito K, Robinson RC (April 2010). "Polymeric structures and dynamic properties of the bacterial actin AlfA". Journal of Molecular Biology. 397 (4): 1031–41.
doi:
10.1016/j.jmb.2010.02.010.
PMID20156449.
^Kürner J, Medalia O, Linaroudis AA, Baumeister W (November 2004). "New insights into the structural organization of eukaryotic and prokaryotic cytoskeletons using cryo-electron tomography". Experimental Cell Research. 301 (1): 38–42.
doi:
10.1016/j.yexcr.2004.08.005.
PMID15501443.
^Izard J (2006). "Cytoskeletal cytoplasmic filament ribbon of Treponema: a member of an intermediate-like filament protein family". Journal of Molecular Microbiology and Biotechnology. 11 (3–5): 159–66.
doi:
10.1159/000094052.
PMID16983193.
S2CID40913042.