From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This page has been removed from search engines' indexes.

Contributor copyright investigation

This CCI cleanup subpage has been opened because concerns of multiple point infringement have been substantiated and further steps are necessary to address the serious risk of copyright violation from the listed contributor. Listings are not intended to imply a presumption of bad faith on the part of any contributor, as copyright laws vary widely around the world and many contributors who violate Wikipedia's copyrights policy do so inadvertently through not understanding it or the United States' laws that govern it.

If you are here because of a note on an article's talk page explaining removal of text, please do not restore any removed text without first ensuring that the text does not duplicate, closely paraphrase or plagiarize from a previously published source. You are welcome to use sourced facts that may have been removed to create new content in your own words or to incorporate brief quotations of copyrighted material in accordance with the non-free content policy and guideline.

Instructions

All contributors with no history of copyright problems are welcome to contribute to clean up. Contributors who are the subject of a contributor copyright investigation are among contributors with a history of copyright problems and so are not welcome to directly evaluate their own or others' copyright violations in CCIs. They are welcome to assist with rewriting any problems identified.

If contributors have been shown to have a history of extensive copyright violation, it may be assumed without further evidence that all of their major contributions are copyright violations, and they may be removed indiscriminately in accordance with Wikipedia:Copyright violations. Contributors who are the subject of a contributor copyright investigation are among contributors who have been shown to have a history of extensive copyright violation and so all of the below listed contributions may be removed indiscriminately. However, to avoid collateral damage, efforts should be made when possible to verify infringement before removal.

When every section is completed, please alter the listing for this CCI at Wikipedia:CCI#Open_investigations to include the tag "completed=yes". This will alert a clerk that the listing needs to be archived.

  • {{CCI-open|Contributor name|Day Month Year|completed=yes}}

Text

  • Examine the article or the diffs linked below.
  • If the contributor has added creative content, either evaluate it carefully for copyright concerns or remove it.
  • Evaluating for copyright concerns may include checking the listed sources, spot-checking using google, google books and other search engines and looking for major differences in writing style. The background may give some indication of the kinds of copyright concerns that have been previously detected. For older text, mirrors of Wikipedia content may make determining which came first difficult. It may be helpful to look for significant changes to the text after it was entered. Searching for the earlier form of text can help eliminate later mirrors. If you cannot determine which came first, text should be removed presumptively, since there is an established history of copying with the editor in question.
  • If you remove text presumptively, place {{ subst:CCI|name=Contributor name}} on the article's talk page.
  • If you specifically locate infringement and remove it (or revert to a previous clean version), place {{ subst:cclean}} on the article's talk page. The url parameter may be optionally used to indicate source.
  • If there is insufficient creative content on the page for it to survive the removal of the text or it is impossible to extricate from subsequent improvements, replace it with {{ subst:copyvio}}, linking to the investigation subpage in the url parameter. List the article as instructed at the copyright problems board, but you do not need to notify the contributor. Your note on the CCI investigation page serves that purpose.
  • To tag an article created by the contributor for presumptive deletion, place {{subst:copyvio|url=see talk}} on the article's face and {{ subst:CCId|name=Contributor name}} on the article's talk page. List the article as instructed at the copyright problems board, but you do not need to notify the contributor.
  • After examining an article:
  • replace the diffs after the colon on the listing with indication of whether a problem was found (add {{ y}}) or not (add {{ n}}). If the article is blanked and may be deleted, please indicate as much after the {{ y}}. The {{ ?}} template may be used for articles where you were unable to determine whether or not a violation occurred, but are prepared to remove the article from consideration – either because the material is no longer present in the article, or it is adequately paraphrased so as to no longer be a violation (please specify which).
  • Follow with your username and the time to indicate to others that the article has been evaluated and appropriately addressed. This is automatically generated by four tildes (~~~~)
  • If a section is complete, consider collapsing it by placing {{ collapse top}} and {{ collapse bottom}} beneath the section header and after the final listing.

Background

Mark Sublette

  • This is really bad- This user appears to have also faked references. For example, this edit cites Rodgers, Phil, "Dakota Heroes", Flypast, Stamford, Lincs., UK, Number 53, December 1985, pages 24-27 - Whatever this is, it does not exist; No trace of it can be found through an internet search. Another example if The newspaper cited here; the referenced newspaper story does not exist. This is going to make presumptive removals necessary, as material insered by this user now runs afoul of WP:V and possibly WP:HOAX. Moneytrees🌴 Talk🌲 Help out at CCI! 03:00, 31 March 2020 (UTC) reply
The Flypast reference that you questioned is to a well known aviation magazine - we have an article about the magazine - Flypast magazine, and from [12] - a site selling back issues of the magazine, it seems that the article referenced did exist - while it may be difficult to confirm whether these dead tree reliable sources have been closelyparaphrased, we shouldn't be assuming that they are non-existant just because a search on the internet doesn't find them - oss line references are still allowed. Nigel Ish ( talk) 22:24, 1 May 2020 (UTC) reply
Nigel Ish, Hmm... that makes this easier and harder. On the one hand, there isn't an imminent threat to the truthfulness of articles. On the other, this means that the sources used are obscure and hard to find..... I don't want to do a bunch of presumptive deletions, but it's going to be hard not to, unless we can get some help from some aviation database or someone who happens to have access to a bunch of old aviation magazines and books. Moneytrees🌴 Talk🌲 Help out at CCI! 23:14, 1 May 2020 (UTC) reply
The newspaper article is available online [13] - the text in the article is almost identical but I don't know if it's still copyrighted. Peter James ( talk) 16:14, 2 April 2021 (UTC) reply

Contribution survey

Pages 1 through 20

Pages 21 through 40

Pages 41 through 60

Pages 61 through 80

Pages 81 through 100

Pages 101 through 120

Pages 121 through 140

Pages 141 through 160

Pages 161 through 180

Pages 181 through 200

Pages 201 through 220

Pages 221 through 240

Pages 241 through 260

Pages 261 through 280

Pages 281 through 300

Pages 301 through 320

Pages 321 through 340

Pages 341 through 360

Pages 361 through 380

Pages 381 through 400

Pages 401 through 420

Pages 421 through 440

Pages 441 through 460

Pages 461 through 480

Pages 481 through 500

Pages 501 through 520

Pages 521 through 540

Pages 541 through 560

Pages 561 through 580

Pages 581 through 600

Pages 601 through 620

Pages 621 through 640

Pages 641 through 660

Pages 661 through 680

Pages 681 through 700

Pages 701 through 720

Pages 721 through 740

Pages 741 through 760

Pages 761 through 780

Pages 781 through 800

Pages 801 through 820

Pages 821 through 840

Pages 841 through 860

Pages 861 through 880

Pages 881 through 900

Pages 901 through 920

Pages 921 through 940

Pages 941 through 960

Pages 961 through 980

Pages 981 through 1000

Pages 1001 through 1040

Pages 1041 through 1080

Pages 1081 through 1100

Pages 1101 through 1140

Pages 1141 through 1180

Pages 1181 through 1200

Extended content

Pages 1201 through 1220

Extended content

Pages 1221 through 1240

Extended content

Pages 1241 through 1260

Extended content

Pages 1261 through 1284

No violations. –  dudhhr  talk  contribs (he/they) 21:24, 27 October 2022 (UTC) reply

This report generated by ContributionSurveyor.java at 2020-02-12T20:19:56.106984Z.

Retrieved from " https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Wikipedia:Contributor_copyright_investigations/20200212&oldid=1213276913"