Semi-protection: Persistent IP disruption.
HistoryofIran (
talk) 23:09, 30 September 2020 (UTC)reply
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of
dispute resolution. Only a single IP editor in the last 2 weeks, so protection would be inappropriate, regardless. GoodnightmushTalk 19:13, 1 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 22:17, 1 October 2020 (UTC)reply
(Non-administrator comment) for the bot: Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. by
Ohnoitsjamie —
Blablubbs(
talk •
contribs) 22:28, 1 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: The same IP user (
User:180.217.85.130) just came back again inserting his original research. The IP user was blocked after I requested the protection on 28 September 2020. I'm not sure how he is able to edit again so soon.
Matt Smith (
talk) 09:20, 30 September 2020 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last
8 days.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 09:28, 30 September 2020 (UTC)reply
Hopefully, this issue can be handled. Disruptive activities are continuing to happen. --
Matt Smith (
talk) 07:28, 1 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk) 19:38, 1 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – due to current news stories, the page is being vandalised. just a temporary lock.
EosaphOScollain (
talk) 19:22, 1 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk) 19:30, 1 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – A lot of disruptive editing recently and in the past as well.
Semsûrî (
talk) 19:31, 1 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., it does not seem to me that disruption is frequent enough to justify semi-protection--
Ymblanter (
talk) 19:35, 1 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – The move wars began again immediately after the old protection was lifted.
Helper202 (
talk) 15:07, 30 September 2020 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: This user who requested protection has been blocked.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 16:31, 30 September 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Vandalism started the same day the page became unprotected.
Dylsss (
talk) 17:39, 1 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Let's try pending changes for a few months. OhNoitsJamieTalk 19:11, 1 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 22:18, 30 September 2020 (UTC)reply
Already protected by administrator Ponyo.
Favonian (
talk) 15:56, 1 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – Edit warring concerning the ethnicities of the suspect and victim - and whether or not they should be mentioned.
Crboyer (
talk) 00:57, 1 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Persistent vandalism over several IP users who continue to make unsourced edits over the production date of one generation.
Areaseven (
talk) 02:07, 1 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamieTalk 13:14, 1 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Indefinite extended confirmed protection:BLP policy violations – This page has been vandalized several times. ~ A. Shohag (
pingme or
Talk) 11:56, 1 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- LuK3(Talk) 12:19, 1 October 2020 (UTC)reply
@
LuK3: Thank you. As I expect that with this much period this could be vandalized smoothly again. ~ A. Shohag (
pingme or
Talk) 12:33, 1 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Indefinite extended confirmed protection:BLP policy violations.
Chennai Passangai (
talk) 13:18, 30 September 2020 (UTC)reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. The previous protection has only just now expired. Let's wait and see if the problem recurs before protecting the article again.
MelanieN (
talk) 00:17, 1 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – Increase in disruptive editing corresponding with last night's debate. I am
WP:INVOLVED. –
Muboshgu (
talk) 17:21, 30 September 2020 (UTC)reply
Extended confirmed protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. as arbitration enforcement--
Ymblanter (
talk) 17:26, 30 September 2020 (UTC)reply
Indefinite pending changes: Persistent
vandalism – This page is being persistently vandalised and has been protected multiple times before.
Cairo2k18 •
(talk) •
(contribs) 04:42, 30 September 2020 (UTC)reply
Already protected by administrator AlisonW.
MelanieN (
talk) 23:51, 30 September 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced content – a transfer that has not been officially announced, yet. The page was previously protected until yesterday.
Robby.is.on (
talk) 08:23, 30 September 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk) 23:58, 30 September 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection:BLP policy violations – Vandalized several times shortly after protection expired. Last protection duration was 1 month. I recommend 2 months this time to last through the presidential election. —
Tartan357(
Talk) 22:15, 30 September 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 6 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Jackmcbarn (
talk) 23:00, 30 September 2020 (UTC)reply
Declined. Filer blocked from editing the page.Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 15:59, 2 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Bad block on my part. Discussing with the requester, but the page is already protected anyway.
Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 16:10, 2 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: This kind of page shouldn't be edited by anons, because this page is in the Wikipedia namespace, and it maintains a list of templates, which can be easily messed up by anons. Plus its more of a user thing. Protect it from non autoconfirmed users too.
♦/\/\/\TheGeometryDashFan/\/\/\♦ (
talk) 17:45, 2 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Automated comment:@
GeometryDashFan12: This request cannot be parsed. Please ensure it follows formatting consistent with the current or previous methods of submission.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 17:58, 2 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: High level of persistent IP vandalism - I have to undo/revert these changes multiple times a week.
Saintandy7 (
talk) 13:00, 2 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. –
Muboshgu (
talk) 18:31, 2 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protectedindefinitely. Coming off a one year protection, and with that long protection history... –
Muboshgu (
talk) 18:39, 2 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: Persistent addition of
unsourced or poorly sourced content – a long term pattern of addition of original research, personal summary from unknown sources, inserting blog links.
Graywalls (
talk) 05:47, 1 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Cwmhiraeth (
talk) 13:19, 2 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Repeated recreation of unsourced stub without discussion by multiple IPs.
‡ Єl Cid of Valenciatalk 16:42, 2 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., the article has never been protected before, let us see what happens after one month--
Ymblanter (
talk) 17:33, 2 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. Only three instances of IP vandalism the past month. -- LuK3(Talk) 12:36, 2 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism to birth date of BLP & edit warring.
AussieWikiDan (
talk) 15:45, 2 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Anarchyte (
talk •
work) 16:08, 2 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: An anon has been repeatedly adding unverifiable promotional text to the article and has now created an account in the same name to continue re-inserting this content. (I have no idea if they really are the article subject or not.) User talk page warnings have been ignored. Blocking would be an alternative but protection would stop the user coming back under a different name. I can't protect or block as my reverts make me involved.
SuperMarioMan (
Talk) 20:33, 1 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Cwmhiraeth (
talk) 13:11, 2 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Anon IPs keep changing the year of opening without proper sourcing to backup the change (the cited source gives 2023), could be good-faith but may also possibly be disruptive editing. Would like to request temporary page protection, along with a page notice that references are required. It is easier to ensure that the message would get across to registered users than anon IPs. NoNews! 14:47, 1 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Cwmhiraeth (
talk) 12:39, 2 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of
unsourced or poorly sourced content. Note the prior stints of protection last year were for the same reason (same text being added/changed claiming show was still in production with no source).
Aoi (青い) (
talk) 17:42, 1 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Cwmhiraeth (
talk) 12:46, 2 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection:BLP policy violations – Multiple IPs attempting to erase the sourced mention of his engagement.
Meters (
talk) 06:02, 2 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Thanks for reporting this.
— Newslingertalk 11:42, 2 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Thanks for reporting this.
— Newslingertalk 11:39, 2 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism.
KidAdtalk 03:44, 2 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 06:37, 2 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 05:21, 2 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Already protected by administrator Jackmcbarn. Thanks for reporting this.
— Newslingertalk 11:33, 2 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – BLP subject to vandalism and unreferenced additions due to press speculation.
Egghead06 (
talk) 06:45, 2 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. By the way, the signing has been
confirmed by Reuters as of a few hours ago, although this would need to be cited in the article. Thanks for reporting this.
— Newslingertalk 11:32, 2 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: A new edition of the list was recently published and so the article has experienced some IP edit warring over content.
ili (
talk) 18:39, 30 September 2020 (UTC)reply
Declined, disruption seems to have stopped--
Ymblanter (
talk) 08:14, 2 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Multiple IP vandals due to recent airing, and ongoing debate if this is the season premiere or not please protect to confirmed users only.
SanAnMan (
talk) 01:32, 1 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk) 11:01, 2 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – This article is the constant target of vandalism, and it has gotten pretty vulgar. I would highly recommend protecting the page until the day after Election Day (November 4th 2020), when he is out of the public eye cause of his retirement.
Curbon7 (
talk) 23:01, 30 September 2020 (UTC)reply
Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., I think at this point pending changes protection is more appropriate--
Ymblanter (
talk) 10:50, 2 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Due to the current Armenian-Azerbaijani military conflict, this page is experiencing frequent vandalism.
James Richards (
talk) 02:38, 1 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. as arbitration enforcement--
Ymblanter (
talk) 10:55, 2 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism by registered and IP users.
Rain Forest (
talk) 23:57, 30 September 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Thanks for reporting this.
— Newslingertalk 10:29, 2 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism (possibly by a single dynamic IP). A mixed album review (by The Guardian) is constantly removed from the album ratings by the IP user(s) without any explanation.
Myxomatosis57 (
talk) 12:31, 1 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Thanks for reporting this.
— Newslingertalk 10:27, 2 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – I don't know what the h*ll is going on here but one user, with possible new socks, is adding the same stuff over and over while others revert and/or make sockpuppety and/or hoaxing accusations. Whatever the rights/wrongs of this are, it's getting somewhat disruptive for the article. Thanks.
DBaK (
talk) 12:32, 1 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Thanks for reporting this. Please re-report if the disruption continues after 1 week.
— Newslingertalk 10:33, 2 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: Problematic IP-edits is starting again.
Gråbergs Gråa Sång (
talk) 12:49, 1 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 5 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Thanks for reporting this.
— Newslingertalk 10:37, 2 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – The page was targeted several times by IPs in the last few hours.
Paradise Chronicle (
talk) 10:08, 2 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. as arbitration enforcement--
Ymblanter (
talk) 10:38, 2 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Thanks for reporting this.
— Newslingertalk 10:24, 2 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Permanent template protection: High risk template, now
used on over 11,000 categories. Template uses intricate syntax, and over 11,000 categories are now wholly dependent on it. Any disruption to this template or its sub-templates will have widespread effects. --
BrownHairedGirl(talk) • (
contribs) 08:05, 1 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 08:08, 1 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Ooops! I meant to request an upgrade to permanent template protection. Now fixed. --
BrownHairedGirl(talk) • (
contribs) 10:43, 1 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism.
BlameRuiner (
talk) 10:37, 1 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Thanks for reporting this.
— Newslingertalk 10:17, 2 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – IP vandalism in the wake of Donald Trump testing positive for COVID-19.
Zappa⚡Matic 05:49, 2 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 6 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Jackmcbarn (
talk) 05:55, 2 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism.
Nyook✉ 07:18, 2 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. as arbitration enforcement--
Ymblanter (
talk) 07:50, 2 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary full protection: Persistent
vandalism – 3 weeks. The show expected to premiere by then. -
The9Man(
Talk) 08:01, 2 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., I do not see a reason for full protection, pending changes seem to be more appropriate--
Ymblanter (
talk) 08:11, 2 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – Persistent removal of sourced content just because the person behind the ip could not tolerate a fact that has been well sourced in the article.
Drat8sub (
talk) 21:15, 1 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Declined It looks like all of that disruption is from one IP, who you haven't even warned. If you warn them and it continues from the same IP, it can be solved with a block. If it continues from different IPs, then re-request protection.
Jackmcbarn (
talk) 02:19, 2 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. After 6 months, if it's still happening, the duration can be revisited.
— Maile (
talk) 01:43, 2 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Multi-IP vandalism. Leader of a country at war.
Acebulf (
talk) 22:20, 1 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 23:02, 1 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Politician of a country at war, widespread vandalism.
Acebulf (
talk) 00:14, 2 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 00:33, 2 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Due to the
All Lives Matter article being semi-protected, new users and unregistered users come to this page to praise, criticize, and/or vandalize the topic, which has been added as an entry to the disambiguation page.
WaddlesJP13 (
talk) 00:34, 2 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Jackmcbarn (
talk) 02:23, 2 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: Ongoing election, requesting 3 months of protection. --
Manasbose (
talk |
contribs) 08:33, 30 September 2020 (UTC)reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection., I do not see any disruption after the expiration of the previous protection--
Ymblanter (
talk) 19:37, 1 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – Alqosh is often a page in dispute and targeted by religious and ethnic edits. Please bring some calm in the page.
Paradise Chronicle (
talk) 22:32, 1 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Already protected by administrator Ymblanter. He today set pending changes protection for 1 year; I think we should let it run and see if it's effective before we up to semi-protection.
Red Phoenixtalk 23:09, 1 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Recent frequent vandalism by IP users. 30 trips of the abuse filter within the past month from multiple IPs and spanning multiple dates.
KnowledgeablePersona (
talk) 00:03, 2 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
— Maile (
talk) 01:33, 2 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – Persistent unsourced content addition, unconstructive edits. The article was previously extended c.protected for few days, but as soon as the protection expired the same disruptive edits started in the account. Please this time protect it for 1 month until the season gets started.
Drat8sub (
talk) 14:01, 3 October 2020 (UTC)reply
(Non-administrator comment) note that the page falls into the Armenia/Azerbaijan AC/DS area and please consider a higher level of move protection. —
Blablubbs(
talk •
contribs) 17:14, 3 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. as arbitration enforcement (and I protected the target earlier today as well)--
Ymblanter (
talk) 20:26, 3 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 15:33, 3 October 2020 (UTC)reply
That's because
User:Reaper Eternal kindly responded to the request so quickly that the protection was applied before the bot got onto the case. All done now. --
BrownHairedGirl(talk) • (
contribs) 15:44, 3 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism for weeks. Last protection wasn't long enough to stop it. --
Ureinwohner (
talk) 09:07, 3 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Woody (
talk) 12:00, 3 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection for a year. The page has a long
history of vandalism, mostly of a nationalist basis. It also receives a lot of visits,
55,177, so more vandals can arrive easily and their actions have a higher impact.
SuperΨDro 09:23, 3 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk) 09:28, 3 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent
sockpuppetry –
User:Vili.falenius making the same edit this article has been repeatedly protected for in the past, now as an IP. Robvanvee 11:10, 3 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Woody (
talk) 12:02, 3 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – A number of ip adresses one of them has been involved in persistent vandalism on
Kurmi article (2409:4060:218E:6AD8:D870:6CEB:4DAA:BFFD) are adding unsourced claims and creating disruption. Two sources used had nothing related to subject but appeared sourced so survived the action of recent changes patrollers.
Heba Aisha (
talk) 03:13, 3 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Jackmcbarn (
talk) 03:35, 3 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Legend, and his wife, both suffered a miscarriage over the weekend and several vandals are cruelly changing the number of children he has.
Jorm (
talk) 03:15, 3 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Glen (
talk) 03:22, 3 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Tiegen and her husband suffered a miscarriage over the week and several vandals are cruelly changing the number of children she has.
Jorm (
talk) 03:15, 3 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Glen (
talk) 03:19, 3 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Multiple counts of various IP users vandalizing this page in an effort to falsely change the show's country of origin.
ZootyCutie (
talk) 20:06, 2 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk) 01:28, 3 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection:BLP policy violations – New editors repeatedly adding unsourced BLP information and adding copyright infringing images they upload to Commons. Ravensfire (
talk) 20:51, 2 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk) 01:32, 3 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Vandalism cadence has increased, and this article will never not be a target for it.
Jorm (
talk) 22:08, 2 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 23:45, 2 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Already protected by administrator El C.
MelanieN (
talk) 01:35, 3 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Automated comment:@
InvisibleSatan: This request cannot be parsed. Please ensure it follows formatting consistent with the current or previous methods of submission.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 23:30, 2 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk) 01:41, 3 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Unprotection: Per
Inops: Gordon Brown has been out of the political limelight for coming up to ten years, and hasn't been a MP coming up to five years. I doubt the motivations for the protections placed in 2010 are still much of a concern. ‑‑
Neveselbert (
talk·contribs·email) 21:34, 30 September 2020 (UTC)reply
No, since the protecting admin has not been active for over two weeks. ‑‑
Neveselbert (
talk·contribs·email) 07:02, 1 October 2020 (UTC)reply
@
Courcelles: is the blocking admin, and might be checking his pings even if he hasn't been actively editing lately.
— Maile (
talk) 01:53, 2 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Recent edit warring and content dispute. Still no consensus on the talk page.
Wario-Man (
talk) 08:21, 2 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Comment looks like most of the warring parties have been blocked. Still needed? OhNoitsJamieTalk 14:37, 2 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of
dispute resolution. –
Muboshgu (
talk) 18:27, 2 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism from user:KATESHIMRANI. As one can see from the similarity of the name of the article and the user, as well as the user's reasons for reverting edits, the person is trying to deny the general consensus and facts.--
LeftiePete (
talk) 12:25, 2 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – Persistent removal of sourced content, one of the vital information of the case by different ips. Last time the request was declined, since the removal was done by a single ip, now it has been removed several times by different ips, along with other disrutive edits. Needs an immediate protection of the page.
Drat8sub (
talk) 21:21, 2 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Jackmcbarn (
talk) 00:06, 3 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. The ips are removing so swifly the facts that even recent change patrollers are not able to fix properly.
Heba Aisha (
talk) 21:22, 2 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Jackmcbarn (
talk) 00:06, 3 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – This page has been deleted 4 times in 2020: 3 in September 2020 and the latest one today.
Steven (Editor) (
talk) 19:34, 4 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Creation protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Jackmcbarn (
talk) 20:32, 4 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. as arbitration enforcement--
Ymblanter (
talk) 18:17, 4 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Extended confirmed protection: High level of IP vandalism and disruptive edits from new users. Issue connected to the recent
2020 Nagorno-Karabakh conflict.
AntonSamuel (
talk) 01:09, 4 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Hopefully this suffices, otherwise we can upgrade to extended confirmed.
Favonian (
talk) 14:50, 4 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Indefinite extended confirmed protection:Arbitration enforcement – Polish WWII area. Suspicious IP edits have occurred. (
t ·
c) buidhe 01:40, 4 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – High level of ip vandalism and unsourced edits.
Heba Aisha (
talk) 13:56, 4 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Please find the last good version. There's so much disruption last I saw a Boeing aircraft apparently entered the house. Glen (
talk) 14:04, 4 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: – In recent days there's been some vandalism, BLP violations and disruptive edits by various IP editors. Short-term temporary semi-protection would, in my view, be helpful.
Kind Tennis Fan (
talk) 23:29, 3 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – There has been slow but persistent attempts to remove sourced information from this page ever since the page protection expired at the end of September. The page has been protected almost constantly since its creation so I think indefinite semi-protection is worth considering at this point.
GorillaWarfare(talk) 11:38, 4 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – Unexplained removals of content taking place by multiple IPs from the same range (probably the same person). An alternative solution could be rangeblocking the IP.
Eternal ShadowTalk 22:14, 3 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 04:53, 4 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Already protected by administrator Mifter.
Favonian (
talk) 11:15, 4 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Indefinite pending changes: Persistent
vandalism – This is a low-watchers article of an active politician which has encountered various vandalism attempts, some of which stuck for weeks.
[1][2] Therefore, pending changes is justified to keep readers from seeing vandalism. (
t ·
c) buidhe 22:20, 3 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent removal of 'irrational' from dictionary-based definition of chauvinism, together with attempts to fool Cluebot, coinciding with Trump administration's refusal to condemn Proud Boys white supremacist group. Temporary semi-protection requested until end of US presidential election (end November).
Johncdraper (
talk) 09:09, 4 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Favonian (
talk) 11:39, 4 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Identical to request immediately above.
Favonian (
talk) 11:31, 4 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Multiple attempts from various IPs and a new user (as first edit) keep adding the same 100 character edit about a hypothetical medicine that is unsourced and violates
WP:CRYSTALBALL.
Zinnober9 (
talk) 00:05, 4 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 10:56, 4 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: ok so i guess at the bottom is where you apply for a page to be protected
alright so anyways i request for this article to be protected because some [racist statement redacted] literally removed SCORES of meaningful content from the before-mentioned article under an ip
like
check their contribs
i warned them but an administrator undid my edit and i only reverted one of their edits i wasnt actually there to revert all of the vandalism because i checked recentchanges and did not see it up until now so yeah this is my request for this page to be semi-protected so that only unregistered and non-autoconfirmed users can not edit it because this VERY CLEARLY is a target of vandalism from what i have just seen i dont know why i havent requested this yet .-.
BumbleBeast57445 (
talk) 22:15, 3 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: 3 IPs have vandalized this page between September 21st-September 30th. As only WugBot updates this listing, it shouldn't be open to contributors who wish to vandalize this page.
MrLinkinPark333 (
talk) 23:16, 3 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Edit-warring by IP-hopping IP editor who refused discussion.
Hzh (
talk) 18:38, 3 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Please take note of my comment on the talk page.
Woody (
talk) 23:03, 3 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Unprotection: To be able to create the article
Since the deletion discussion in 4 July 2019 [
[3]] - The article is updated and rewritten using new references that establish notability.
I'm opposed to unprotection. The highlighted secondary sources fall short of the mark IMO: the InfoWorld and Dotnetpro coverage reads like a press release, muslim-res's coverage of the language itself is purely a QA interview (there's some secondary coverage of its creator but that doesn't help build a case for the language), Ciklum is of unclear reliability and has fairly brief coverage. The article in draftspace itself reads like a README, there's barely a shred of independent analysis of the subject throughout (unsurprising, given the above sources). signed, Rosguilltalk 20:29, 2 October 2020 (UTC)reply
In one of the deletion discussions about a programming language called Citrine [
[4]] We used a reference from the same magazine (InfoWorld) by the same author (Paul Krill) to establish notability. I think it's a good secondary reference.
Charmk (
talk) 21:32, 2 October 2020 (UTC)reply
"The article in draftspace itself reads like a README" The article could be improved by other editors, if after creating the article someone don't like the reference (another deletion discussion is a better place).
It's an Unprotection request, so when other editors accept the draft, they can move it to the main space. I will not do this myself, and not each draft reviewer is an administrator.
Charmk (
talk) 21:37, 2 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Not unprotected If and when an editor reviews the article and wants to move it to article space, then it can be unprotected.
Woody (
talk) 11:58, 3 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: High level of IP
vandalism and persistent addition of unsourced data in specific sections.
Burocan (
talk) 08:41, 5 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Graeme Bartlett (
talk) 22:36, 5 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Ongoing vandalism by several IPs.
HaeB (
talk) 08:50, 5 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Graeme Bartlett (
talk) 22:38, 5 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Graeme Bartlett (
talk) 22:40, 5 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – A person with the same name and the same party died yesterday. People getting confused are editing this Page. Lightbluerain❄ (
Talk |
contribs) 10:52, 5 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Second this. This is a BLP issue since editors in good faith keep incorrectly claiming that this one has died. Identical three-part name, same political party, but wrong person. I made this worse by adding an English news source for the unsourced claims of the death, without realizing the error in identification.
Meters (
talk) 20:33, 5 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Graeme Bartlett (
talk) 22:46, 5 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – IP editor (presumably the same person as before, since they're making the exact same edits) going ham on changing "referee" to "linesman". Makes no sense to me. jp×g 10:04, 5 October 2020 (UTC)reply
This is not going away. The IP hopper is blocked on two IPs and is now at AIV for edit warring the identical obsolete terminology with a third IP.
Meters (
talk) 20:18, 5 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Now blocked on third IP by
User:LuK3, but likely to continue given that the edit had been made 28 times in the last 24 hours.
Meters (
talk) 20:23, 5 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
-- LuK3(Talk) 20:25, 5 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: Please protect for a number of years, an IP has been adding the same unsourced statement about speed limits since September 2016 and it already has
12 logs. This editor has also been warned and blocked a number of times on a number of IP addresses. It was pending changes protected from August 2019 to August 2020 and even then this change was made 5 times, in the month and a bit that its been unprotected this change was made 3 times. For this reason it should probably be standard semi not PC. Crouch, Swale (
talk) 17:55, 5 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection:BLP policy violations – A brief protection was tried back in July which stopped it for about a week, but the issues have continued periodically since. ‑‑ElHef (
Meep?) 15:12, 5 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Brief semi-protection of talk page. I really don't like the idea of protecting talk pages, but this one is the latest target of the IP=hopping 2a01 troll (
2a01:119f:31b:5d00:64b6:46ee:9910:1d2a/39(
talk·contribs·deleted contribs·logs·filter log·block user·block log)). I am hoping that a short semi will result him giving up, at least for a while. BTW, is it now possible to apply a rangeblock to just one page? That would make it unlikely to cause collateral damage if the software allows it.
Guy Macon (
talk) 15:26, 5 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 15:58, 5 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – newish editor adds stuff based on YouTube-videos.
Huldra (
talk) 23:29, 4 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Non-admin comment:
Huldra, This edit that you see are not vandalism, instead there is actually adding unsourced or poorly sourced content which one user adding Youtube as a source for claim about this nationality, which I see is not reliable per
WP:RS. I already reporting the user at
ANI.
180.241.205.155 (
talk) 23:48, 4 October 2020 (UTC)reply
I agree it is not vandalism -just used it as it was the twinkle-protection-option -sorry! Anyway, this needs some action, either protecting the article, or blocking the user; I thought that protecting the article was the "softest" option,
Huldra (
talk) 23:58, 4 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Declined Seems to have died dwon somewhat. Protection may be a soft option, but it shuts down the whole article. Please report single users/IPs to AIV instead; this will stop the disruption while keeping the article as open as can be.
Lectonar (
talk) 12:02, 5 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Once again, Scott The Woz fans are vandalizing the page. O.N.R.(talk) 00:40, 5 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Persistent addition of unsourced promotional content by a range of IP editors. — BillHPike (
talk,
contribs) 07:01, 5 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Lectonar (
talk) 12:21, 5 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Requesting semi protection due to persistent vandalism and malicious edits by
Belenardo despite repeated reversals and warnings.
Riot kiddo (
talk) 17:19, 4 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Content dispute as far as I am concerned. Certainly not vandalism.--
Ymblanter (
talk) 18:16, 4 October 2020 (UTC)reply
I only contribute truthful statements quoting and specifically naming/ referencing the subject in the wikipedia page to official documents of the United Nations, European Union and United State State Department and placing the reference in its footnote for everyone to validate.--
Belenardo (
talk) 03:49, 5 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of
dispute resolution.
Lectonar (
talk) 11:58, 5 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism which has been going on for a while now.--
LeftiePete (
talk) 12:46, 5 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last
8 days.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 12:57, 5 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamieTalk 14:21, 5 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Frequent vandalism and unsourced changes today based on his rumoured transfer to Manchester United. Protection till tomorrow should be enough.
Osario(talk) 13:20, 5 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamieTalk 14:20, 5 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. See above.
Lectonar (
talk) 13:44, 5 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Indefinite pending changes: The key reason to be protected (sockpuppetry) does not apply anymore (the sockpuppeteer is gone). There have been requests to add edits at the talk page. The article is out-of-shape and has been protected for 9 years. I suggest PC as song-related articles tend to be targets of unsourced edits.
(CC)Tbhotch™ 04:52, 5 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: semi-protection has expired and vandalism has begun again. Edit-warring and vandalism from mostly IP users. --
Salimfadhley (
talk) 19:08, 4 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last
8 days.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 19:16, 4 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Cwmhiraeth (
talk) 06:16, 5 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – One user keeps removing material over and over again.
Megaman en m (
talk) 21:22, 4 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Indefinite semi-protection: There is a coordinated effort by COI editors to remove sourced information from the Stuart Hatton article. The latest COI user stated "Will keep deleting these until they're accepted..." --
Kbabej (
talk) 21:56, 4 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Cwmhiraeth (
talk) 06:34, 5 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last
8 days.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 12:57, 4 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
MelanieN (
talk) 03:16, 5 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Persistent vandalism over the past week by anonymous users.
Cairo2k18 •
(talk) •
(contribs) 04:00, 5 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Anarchyte (
talk •
work) 06:17, 5 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Horse just won the race, the newbies and IPs are making junk edits.
Montanabw(talk) 22:18, 3 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. They must have gotten it all out of their system yesterday.
MelanieN (
talk) 00:39, 5 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Disruptive edits from IPs that have persisted for several years. The last time I listed this article here, the protection was set to expire in January 2021. Not sure what happened there. Sure would be nice if the article was protected for a couple years at least.
ili (
talk) 19:25, 4 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I don't know what happened to the earlier PC protection, but PC is a good choice for this article.
MelanieN (
talk) 03:25, 5 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Frequently vandalised in the past 3 months since the club was renamed – women's football team that is now connected to a club with a very large following. Edits mainly consist of deleting the history of the predecessor club (legally the same entity), as its history was slightly complicated. They're playing their first game as Real Madrid Femenino today, so the unhelpful edits will probably intensify. Some other anon users have contributed well-sourced info that has made it into a decent article. –
Demokra (
talk) 12:18, 4 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection Persistent IP vandalism - continues to restore article that does not meet notability guidelines
Evaders99 (
talk) 00:00, 5 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Jackmcbarn (
talk) 01:55, 5 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing by a few IP addresses. The page was semi-protected before but the vandalism continued after protection expired.
Swirlyloop (
talk) 02:46, 4 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk) 00:57, 5 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: Persistent blanking for controversies section by new registered and ip users. Also replacing commons image w/ unlicensed image.
Emperork (
talk) 04:16, 4 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk) 01:11, 5 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism has been occurring on this page by various IP editors and guests, including unflattering edits of Assemblyman Garbarino's headshot. Short-term temporary semi-protection up and through the United States election on November 3rd would help stop these troll edits from occurring. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Random kid23 (
talk •
contribs) 23:38, 3 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk) 00:42, 5 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – clear, ongoing edit war. Thanks,
EDG 543 (
talk) 00:36, 4 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Fully protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I do see discussion at the talk page, but so far it hasn't stopped the warring.
MelanieN (
talk) 00:45, 5 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Indefinite full protection: Persistent
vandalism – High level of vandalism going on in the article, as soon as the protection expired on 16 september vandalism restarted in the article. I don't know if full protection would be necessary or EC protection would be enough, but the article seriously need an immediate protection.
Drat8sub (
talk) 02:20, 4 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk) 00:51, 5 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary pending changes: Persistent
disruptive editing – Previous edit-warring by a blocked/globally locked editor now continued by IPs. — MarkH21talk 22:06, 3 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. @
Randomperson7893457: Note that
WP:VANDALISM has a specific definition. This does not meet it and saying another user's good faith edits are vandalism is in itself a personal attack. This page (and Taylor Swift) are the subject of
edit warring for which several users are now blocked.
Woody (
talk) 12:09, 4 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – Fairly persistent attempts over the last month to delete or redirect this page, despite
a deletion discussion.
Waggie (
talk) 04:27, 6 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 19:41, 6 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 19:41, 6 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 13:12, 5 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Already done by Materialscientist. for about 3 months
Graeme Bartlett (
talk) 22:34, 5 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Requesting immediate archiving...Malcolmxl5 (
talk) 21:15, 6 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Full protection: High level of IP vandalism, some user vandalism by
PeterClaverCullen. IP(s) attempting to impersonate the page's subject, which even if true would violate
WP:COI. User has attempted to do the same on the equivalent
TFwiki page using the same username, trying to use their own false information added to the Wikipedia page as a source. Similar edits were previously made at
Gobots,
The Transformers (TV series), and
Challenge of the GoBots. Suggest temporary full protection and banning PeterClaverCullen for being a vandalism-only account. --
Cyberlink420 (
talk) 16:26, 6 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Getting a lot of IPs adding nonsense edits. Possible due to film being tied to video games and with various social media influencers being involved.
Masem (
t) 05:21, 6 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 09:05, 6 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Looks like someone protected it after my request (tons more edits followed. We found a couple YouTubers that seemed to be trying to push these edits). --
Masem (
t) 17:07, 6 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of
unsourced or poorly sourced content – Same types of edits that led to the last two rounds of semi-protection.
Aoi (青い) (
talk) 18:08, 6 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Already done by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. - pending changes protection has been added to the page so this can be closed out. (Non-administrator comment)
Aoi (青い) (
talk) 19:54, 6 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – IPs and New Accounts keep changing team name he plays for. NZFC(talk)(cont) 05:29, 6 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamieTalk 15:43, 6 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Permanent semi-protection: The page has been slowly, but consistently attacked by IP editors for years. Virtually all edits to this page since the last main update one year ago are either vandalism or reverts of vandalism. As of today, there has been
119 edits in four months without one single valid change.
T*U (
talk) 10:26, 6 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Even I had noticed this some months ago, looks like it has been going for quite some time now. Definitely needs some form of protection the usual target of nationalistic vandals et all.
Gotitbro (
talk) 11:40, 6 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
sockpuppetry – This AFD was blanked by sockpuppets. Since the AFD is closed, there is no need to keep it available for new participation, so I am requesting that it be protected against any future sockpuppetry.
Robert McClenon (
talk) 14:46, 6 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – IP pushing POV, they've added badfaith messages on my talk page as well. ─
The Aafī (talk) 06:13, 6 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Non-admin commentTheAafi, this is more likely a content dispute regarding removal of reliable sources.
36.68.186.156 (
talk) 07:30, 6 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of
dispute resolution.
Lectonar (
talk) 10:29, 6 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Full Protection: Persistent edit warring on adding non scheduled flights to the article. Failure to take to talk page, also noticing
WP:BATTLE,
taking ownership of article, and sock puppetry.
172.223.6.230 (
talk) 11:47, 5 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Can we protect this page for, like, forever? It's getting attacked every couple of months for years, always from different IPs.
BlameRuiner (
talk) 08:28, 6 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Indefinite pending changes: Persistent
vandalism – Politician under fire. The Bannertalk 08:50, 6 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. - Since the beginning of August, there have been edits from two different IPs and a named account; that can still easily be handled via blocks and warnings.
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Persistent addition of unsourced names and content by ip users for last 1 month. Need a temporary protection until league starts in December.
Drat8sub (
talk) 17:58, 5 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection.
Graeme Bartlett (
talk) 22:56, 5 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – The edit history has mostly consisted of IPs adding (typically unsourced) popular culture references to the alt-history video game modification Kaiserreich and then getting reverted. — csc-1 18:27, 5 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 02:33, 6 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Much of the page is distateful to those that prefer a sola scriptura historiography; IPs frequently delete portions.
GPinkerton (
talk) 17:03, 5 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. Although there is slow edit warring going on, a less POV text would likely reduce that. But anyway it is only a few edits per month.
Graeme Bartlett (
talk) 22:52, 5 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Lots of vandalism today due to his transfer to Manchester United.
Osario(talk) 23:02, 5 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 23:32, 5 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Already protected by administrator Ponyo.
MelanieN (
talk) 00:56, 6 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: The trailer to the film was released, and the film's Wikipedia page has been prone to vandalism from day one, presumably from IPs watching the trailer.
Call me when you get the chance 18:04, 5 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Graeme Bartlett (
talk) 23:21, 5 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: High level of persistent IP vandalism from various IP addresses over a prolonged period of time.
PlanespotterA320 (
talk) 18:39, 5 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. No edits since September 28. -- LuK3(Talk) 20:48, 5 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: High level of persistent IP vandalism from various IP addresses over a prolonged period of time.
PlanespotterA320 (
talk) 18:39, 5 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. There hasn't been any edits on the article since early September. -- LuK3(Talk) 20:47, 5 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Persistent addition of unsourced content from various IPs.
BOVINEBOY2008 13:44, 4 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection. This is a rather new article, disruption not too high.
Lectonar (
talk) 11:55, 5 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. I see two or three reverts since the beginning of September. OhNoitsJamieTalk 19:58, 5 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Page seems to be under attack from multiple different IP’s. Seems like some sort of coordinated attack.
Johand199(
Talk) 22:49, 5 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 14:36, 7 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Edit warring by some IP hopper. Seems an user (Smokva26) uses log-in log-out to continue edit warring.
Wario-Man (
talk) 18:47, 7 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk) 19:01, 7 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – IP keeps adding unsourced edits such as TV company being founded in 19th century.
Le Deluge (
talk) 09:17, 7 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Declined Looks like the unsourced additions are specific to that /64 IP range. I have warned the IP editors and will block that range if they continue. -- LuK3(Talk) 15:16, 7 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Different users adding nonsense, e g Michelle Obama as see also.
Sjö (
talk) 19:15, 7 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – Now entering day two of edit warring, with an IP user making mass replacements of the graphics and a registered user objecting and asking the IP user to discuss.
Largoplazo (
talk) 11:37, 7 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 14:36, 7 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. Semi-protected for 1 month. -- LuK3(Talk) 15:17, 7 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Some IP users are adding unsourced contents and removing sourced contents .
WhiteFalcon1 (
talk) 11:42, 7 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- LuK3(Talk) 15:19, 7 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – Various IPs adding links to 2020, Donald Trump, White House Covid Outbreak, etc. without appropriate sourcing/due diligence.
DonIago (
talk) 13:12, 7 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 14:36, 7 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. Semi-protected for 1 month. -- LuK3(Talk) 15:20, 7 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Edit warring by IP and registered user, both beyond 3RR. Neither party discusses on the talk page.
Austronesier (
talk) 19:50, 6 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
GedUK 09:43, 7 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Indefinite Extended confirmed protection: Persistent removal of redirect from the page by ip and newly registered users. The phenomenon of removing redirect has been observed for last few months, needs a permanent protection.
Drat8sub (
talk) 22:23, 6 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Already protected.
GedUK 09:44, 7 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. This seems to be a content dispute rather than vandalism. Please attempt to communicate with the IP.
Cwmhiraeth (
talk) 06:32, 7 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Three separate anonymous IP addresses have made unexplained informationectomies at
Sara Moonves. I think they are all conflict of interest edits by a single individual. I request semi-protection.
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism.
Declined@
Geo Swan: Sorry but the edits are defensible and there is no discussion on talk. I've only glanced at the article (and am not offering an opinion on content) but having a paragraph devoted to someone having to lay off staff (during covid) in such a short article would need to be justified (what sources suggest it is significant in the life of the subject?), while edits to remove it are not
vandalism.
Johnuniq (
talk) 02:10, 7 October 2020 (UTC)reply
You note that "there is no discussion on talk". That is precisely the point. Complicated and controversial edits should never be explained solely by an edit summary. It is the biggest trigger to edit warring, because the person who disagrees is tempted to reply in their own edit summary. Semi-protection is a tool to prevent this kind of edit-warring. In this particular case the individual behind the edits didn't even leave meaningful edit summaries.
You note you didn't really read the article, but assert "someone having to lay off staff (during covid)" wasn't noteworthy? The very substantial layoff predated covid shutdowns. The layoff was not due to covid.
Geo Swan (
talk) 02:21, 7 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Someone wanting to add contested material to a BLP needs to justify it with at least a brief explanation on talk. That's standard, even when dealing with IPs. At any rate, removing it is not vandalism.
Johnuniq (
talk) 02:48, 7 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Repeated removal of the same material, without any attempt at explanation -- what we saw here -- is edit warring, a kind of vandalism.
I placed the passage in the article, when I first started it. I strongly disagree with your characterization that it is "contested material". I don't know how you reached that interpretation. There are additional RS I could have used, in addition to the NYTimes. Was that really necessary?
Geo Swan (
talk) 04:13, 7 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Any opinions on what to do? The problem is that over a long period (probably more than the six months I looked at), IPs add original research saying that various agencies (such as the FBI) have engaged in
Zersetzung due to [incident with no mention of Zersetzung]. There is a section at
Talk:Zersetzung#Similar techniques elsewhere deletions explaining this problem, but no one has responded. I don't like PC and am unsure what precedent there is to apply it indefinitely when the article has never been protected. I would semi protect for 3 months and escalate from there, but I'm hoping for thoughts or, better still, someone to act on the request.
Johnuniq (
talk) 02:30, 7 October 2020 (UTC)reply
@
The Banner: In case there is no further discussion here, please notify me if problems continue and I will semi for 3 months.
Johnuniq (
talk) 04:18, 7 October 2020 (UTC)reply
@
The Banner:@
Johnuniq: Actually, this is a perfect example of where to use pending changes (and why pending-changes protection was implemented in the first place): very low rate of edits, repetive kind of disruption, not a very great burden of reviewing the rare edit by IPs when theys occur. I would have no qualms whatsoever to put this under pending changes, let's say for 6 months at first while watchlisting. Not having the satisfaction of your edits going live immediately is sometimes a very great deterrent to this kind of disruption.
Lectonar (
talk) 06:19, 7 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – This article has been constantly vandalized. For some reason, it was heavily edited during the month of September; now, it's calmed down a bit, but to avoid more vandalism it would be a better idea to semi-protect this page anyways. Thank you and best regards.
Paul Vaurie (
talk) 19:16, 6 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Declined@
Paul Vaurie: It has been a bit long since the vandalism and the only recent IP edit (today) seems good. Ping me if problems resume.
Johnuniq (
talk) 04:23, 7 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: IP keeps restoring large blocks of unsourced marketing text and puffery. –
Jonesey95 (
talk) 01:53, 7 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Cwmhiraeth (
talk) 07:24, 7 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism.
Ckruschke (
talk) 18:15, 6 October 2020 (UTC)Ckruschkereply
Declined@
Ckruschke: The couple of recent IP edits that I checked were not
vandalism. In fact, they looked like good editing. Please explain on article talk (last edited in July 2019) what the problem is.
Johnuniq (
talk) 03:02, 7 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Article has been heavily vandalized by multiple IPs and unconfirmed users since yesterday. PC protection is currently in place, but more protection is needed to prevent further disruption.
CycloneYoristalk! 04:34, 7 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk) 06:42, 7 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. as arbitration enforcement--
Ymblanter (
talk) 06:39, 7 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Repeated vandalism.
Chiswick Chap (
talk) 10:14, 6 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Declined@
Chiswick Chap: Sorry but there is not enough disruption to justify protection at the moment. In the most recent case, the IP reverted themselves, and the single reverted edit in September was not
vandalism.
Johnuniq (
talk) 02:36, 7 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Declined@
Gotitbro: Wouldn't a source be needed for
your edit, regardless of how obvious it might be to insiders? At any rate, removing that text is not
vandalism and there is no explanation on talk.
Johnuniq (
talk) 02:40, 7 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: The page concerns a timeline about a very contentious current military conflict. Since the parent article has been extended-confirmed protected, I believe it would be prudent to apply AT LEAST semi-protection to this page. The page so far has not suffered vandalism, but this is only because it is brand new. I believe that we will see IP vandalism and other disruptive, biased editing unless this page is protected.
TheEpicGhosty (
talk) 12:07, 6 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Non-admin comment Because this is a new article, I don't see any IP vandalism in the page at the point. Because this, the pages cannot be edited prepemtively only because the parent article is protected.
36.68.186.156 (
talk) 12:56, 6 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Declined@
TheEpicGhosty: The IP is correct: articles are not preemptively protected. Please request again if significant disruption occurs.
Johnuniq (
talk) 02:43, 7 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Non-admin commentChennai Passangai, There is no vandalism since then. Why you see it is arbitration enforcement?
36.68.186.156 (
talk) 09:17, 6 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Which arbitration sanction are you referring to here? --
Malcolmxl5 (
talk) 19:25, 6 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Declined@
Chennai Passangai: No recent edits have been reverted. Without ongoing disruption there is no reason to protect the article, and there are no comments on talk.
Johnuniq (
talk) 02:14, 7 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: A Rays pitcher gave up a long home run so IP's are having fun changing the team's owner. I'd suggest protection through the end of the week considering this playoff series would not end until Friday night if all five games are needed.
Tampabay721 (
talk) 02:24, 7 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 03:16, 7 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Already protected by administrator Glen.
Malcolmxl5 (
talk) 03:31, 7 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Needs semi, the vandal IPs are clearly not stopping through pending.
Gotitbro (
talk) 12:15, 6 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Johnuniq (
talk) 02:48, 7 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Still
nea? --
Ureinwohner (
talk) 14:59, 6 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last
8 days.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 15:08, 6 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Johnuniq (
talk) 02:51, 7 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Indefinite semi-protection: It's an article relating to the presential race. It needs some level of protection.
Idan (
talk) 15:39, 6 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I can see it probably will need longer protection but I would need more time than I have now to investigate the paperwork required for AP2. The most recent IP edit was good and it's only a now-indeffed SPA who was trouble recently.
Johnuniq (
talk) 02:55, 7 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Protection expired yesterday and activity picked right back up. Looks to have hit it big on social media a few days ago and it hasn't quieted down yet. ‑‑ElHef (
Meep?) 17:04, 6 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Johnuniq (
talk) 02:56, 7 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing and addtn of unsourced content mostly by IPs. Needs at least some mid term protections, considering the activity has gone up ever since the pandemic.
Gotitbro (
talk) 09:40, 6 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Johnuniq (
talk) 02:32, 7 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Repeated disruptive editing and vandalism; it has even gone far for one editor to add a homophobic, sexist, and grossly offensive statement to the article.
Mediafanatic17 (
talk) 01:45, 6 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. It hasn't been protected for quite a while and long protection comes after shorter times are shown to be ineffective.
Johnuniq (
talk) 02:04, 7 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Persistent IP vandalism today, a short dose of semi protection ought to do the trick until it settles down.
Hog FarmBacon 02:55, 6 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Johnuniq (
talk) 02:05, 7 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Semi-creation protect for consistency with
Draft:E, since it looks like the drafts being created there have just been moved here for whatever reason.
Nathan2055talk -
contribs 20:30, 6 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
sockpuppetry – Repeated additions of copyright infringing images uploaded by various socks of Jagdeep singh bittu. Ravensfire (
talk) 21:55, 6 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 23:14, 6 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 18:49, 8 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – IPs and new single-purpose editors are continually adding a non-notable person to this disambig page as a red link, or linking to a declined draft.
Paisarepa 19:46, 8 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Jackmcbarn (
talk) 19:48, 8 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Not done If the expert is not notable enough for a page we do not need to mention him/her/them.
Emir of Wikipedia (
talk) 16:37, 8 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Not done, for the bot.
Favonian (
talk) 17:25, 8 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: IP vandalism arising out of this morning's decision about the presidential debates, twice in ten minutes. (Short term, semi-protection should be sufficient.)
Bucketsofg 15:34, 8 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 16:48, 8 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Frequent vandalism and non-notable additions mostly by IPs. Temporary protection expired in August. -
Flori4nKt •
c 09:05, 8 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. Before indefinite semi-protection is put in, we need to see a string of temporary semi-protections and a long term pattern of problems. Currently it's only been semi-protected once for 2 days. Come back if there are more problems.
Fuzheado |
Talk 14:09, 8 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Ongoing disruption/BLP violations by multiple IPs, probably connected to some off-wiki matter. —
Blablubbs(
talk •
contribs) 10:16, 8 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 12:31, 8 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: High level of persist IP vandalism spanning over quite a while.
Firestar464 (
talk) 11:36, 8 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. Only one instance of IP vandalism this month. Please re-report if activity picks up. -- LuK3(Talk) 12:00, 8 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Extended confirmed protection:BLP policy violations – The page is being vandalized for a long time. It has been proceted for a 3 days time. As BLP this needs to be longer. ~ A. Shohag (
pingme or
Talk) 14:23, 8 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. The disruptive edits / vandalism is generally from unregistered users. Semi protection for 2 weeks should be good for now.
Dreamy Jazztalk to me | my contributions 15:03, 8 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Continuously being vandalized by IPs. ─
The Aafī (talk) 14:50, 8 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Hopefully should have died down by then, but feel free to ping me / request here to make it longer or make it extended confirmed. For context look at the news for "Sadyr Japarov" or "Kyrgyzstan election".
Dreamy Jazztalk to me | my contributions 15:09, 8 October 2020 (UTC)reply
@
BrownHairedGirl: The template is already permanently semi-protected, are you asking for full or something else? --
Fuzheado |
Talk 14:02, 8 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism for several days.
HHH Pedrigree (
talk) 21:49, 7 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of
dispute resolution. I do not see IPs, I see always the same registered user and yourself reverting back and forth....
Lectonar (
talk) 09:03, 8 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – POV-pushing
WP:SPA editor continues to blank cited material without consensus on talk page (discussion underway).
Toddst1 (
talk) 23:41, 6 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Note: I'd put this on hold until some people have commented at ANI, where the matter has been brought up in the meantime. Full protection not yet necessary imho.
Lectonar (
talk) 12:38, 7 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Pending changes protection: Since October 3rd, multiple edits from a variety of IPs making the same or similar unsourced change. (
[10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17]) –
108.56.139.120 (
talk) 21:16, 7 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Already protected.
Lectonar (
talk) 09:00, 8 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Indefinite semi-protection: I'd hoped that semi-protecting
Help talk:Introduction would be enough, but alas, I underestimated the ability of new editors to ignore even the most glaring of talk page banners and misplace their requests or test edits. That's happened more than two dozen times this year at
Help talk:Introduction to editing with Wiki Markup/1 (compared to essentially nil appropriate posts from new editors), with a similar situation (albeit less traffic) at the other pages. For new editors who truly want to leave feedback on the tutorial itself, there is a feedback page set up. {{u|Sdkb}}talk 17:00, 7 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Checking to see if protection is necessary. Anarchyte (
talk •
work) 08:17, 8 October 2020 (UTC)reply
This man is out of hinge. He does not read refs and idiotically changes content he does not understand. --
109.92.168.41 (
talk) 14:36, 7 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Vandalism from IPs, high-traffic page of a Category 5 hurricane. ~Destroyeraa🌀 23:39, 7 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Non-admin commentDestroyeraa, As of today i see the page, i not see any vandalism occured at this point. The last IP edit happens few days ago and was reverted.
36.68.186.156 (
talk)
This article has had a high level of vandalism last month and in August. I don’t want to restrict IPs from editing - it’s just that we need to be safe rather than sorry.~Destroyeraa🌀 00:08, 8 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. The last IP edit was three days ago. In the previous weeks I see constructive editing by IPs.
MelanieN (
talk) 00:47, 8 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – repeated attempts to remove content, apparently by same IP address.
Nomoskedasticity (
talk) 15:20, 7 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk) 00:33, 8 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Disruptive IP editing had resumed two days after previous protection was lifted (unexplained removal of sourced content). —
TAnthonyTalk 14:25, 7 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk) 23:32, 7 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last
8 days.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 15:06, 7 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk) 23:37, 7 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Full Proctection Continued edit warring/content dispute on Air India flights to London-Heathrow, which is not a scheduled service. Discussion started at talk page.
Rzxz0839 (
talk) 13:27, 7 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Beg to differ. There seems to be a
meat farm (which have little to no edits outside this article) persistent on adding London–Heathrow without any credible source defined in
WP:AIRPORT-CONTENT, failing
WP:V. Inferring to content from airline booking engine that it's seasonal like you did
here is
original research. I believe the protection should be PC for a temp duration. —
LeoFrank Talk 16:42, 7 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. There is clearly meat/sockpuppetry going on. Semi-protection will stop some but not all of it since some of the socks are autoconfirmed, but let's see how it goes. In the meantime there is discussion at the talk page and it looks as if consensus may be developing. (Remembering that consensus does not have to be unanimous.)
MelanieN (
talk) 22:15, 7 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – IPs keep vandalizing this page by putting Delta as a C5. That is not true, and I am tired of warning IPs of vandalism. ~Destroyeraa🌀 13:31, 9 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Favonian (
talk) 20:21, 9 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism.
Beshogur (
talk) 18:35, 9 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 18:44, 9 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Already protected by administrator Ymblanter. 6 days ago, as a matter of fact.
Favonian (
talk) 20:34, 9 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last
8 days.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 15:27, 9 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 15:57, 9 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: New round of promotional tone and attempt at censoring. The article has been temporarily semi-protected multiple times
[20]. Please consider indefinite semi-protection. --
Horus (
talk) 15:25, 8 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. based on the protection log, 3RR / edit warring by IPv6, and also promotional editing / censoring sourced material.
Dreamy Jazztalk to me | my contributions 11:12, 9 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. The article itself hasn't been edited by anyone in a whole week and there appears to be no substantial disruption before that either.
Kosack (
talk) 12:19, 9 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism.
Zjholder 15:01, 8 October 2020 (UTC)reply
User pages aren't usually protected. I can't see persistent vandalism on your user page. Maybe you meant a different page or made a mistake?
Eyebeller (
talk) 15:06, 8 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Your user page is protected from edits by IPs and new editors (equivalent to semi-protection) by an edit filter so there’s no need for semi-protection. --
Malcolmxl5 (
talk) 15:51, 8 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Declined per Malcolm15. For the bot.
MelanieN (
talk) 01:45, 9 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Several vandalous edits from IP users in the last hour. —
Katie <3 (
talk) 07:04, 9 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk) 07:21, 9 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Crossed with
Nick, but apparently we came to exactly the same conclusion.--
Ymblanter (
talk) 07:25, 9 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Indefinite extended confirmed protection:BLP policy violations – long term addition of unsourced personal info.
Atlantic306 (
talk) 00:29, 8 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Non-admin comment I believe users that vandalize the article with adding unsourced editor are all-IPs. So semi-protection would be guaranteed.
36.68.186.156 (
talk) 01:04, 8 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
MelanieN (
talk) 00:39, 9 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Edit warring by one user against four others. An AN3 case has also been filed. Please ensure AmblinX's edits are reverted once the page is protected.
IceWelder [
✉] 08:30, 8 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Some IP users are unsourced contents and removing sourced contents .
WhiteFalcon1 (
talk) 12:10, 8 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
MelanieN (
talk) 01:06, 9 October 2020 (UTC)reply
This page and its current talk page no longer require page protection. The new
Cultural Marxism conspiracy theory hasn't had any major problems and the topic isn't as politically debated as it once was. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
103.1.58.136 (
talk) 02:45, 7 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Personally, I don't believe that the time has come to unprotect this article, but I'd like to hear from
EdJohnston and
El_C, protecting admins for the article and its talk page, respectively.
Favonian (
talk) 15:40, 7 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: IPs continuing to change info without any explanation or source whatsoever. Have already been reverted multiple times by myself and another user, IPs don't seem willing to explain or provide a source, instead, persisting with the change...
Magitroopa (
talk) 21:18, 8 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Should also be noted that the two IPs seem to possibly be the same person, even editing the
same article within hours of eachother... and the one (74.98.249.253) has a purely disruptive history as seen on
their talk page, and has resumed editing today following a 3-month block.
Magitroopa (
talk) 21:38, 8 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary protection: High-frequency vandalism by IPs. This is otherwise a fairly tame article. Requesting protection for a short period only
AcebulfALT (
talk) 00:11, 8 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk) 00:37, 9 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: Zacharias has recently been reaccused of sexual misconduct. Per recent article history, his article is facing multiple IP users providing poor biographical description.
VistaSunset (
talk) 07:27, 8 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk) 00:51, 9 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – All edits since the last protection expired have been either vandalism or reverts.
Wham2001 (
talk) 20:44, 8 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Vandalism from multiple IPs in the last 12 hours.
Fylindfotberserk (
talk) 08:08, 8 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamieTalk 22:56, 8 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: persistent
vandalism. Users keep adding "[name]'s husband" to the group member's names.
Alex (
talk) 10:17, 8 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamieTalk 22:58, 8 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Full-protection: High and unusual amount of Vandalism/Unsourced content from unregistered IP users. Unregistered users Frequently try to change the birth and death year (935-1920/26) without proper resources to support spam posts in social media. the persian page is already in protection for the same reason.
Farnud.r (
talk) 03:24, 10 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Already protected by administrator Cwmhiraeth., full protection is not needed at the moment--
Ymblanter (
talk) 18:04, 10 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: Increase of IP vandalism, and BLP violations of late. Page has been protected twice before, once for 6 months, the other for 12 months. LugnutsFire Walk with Me 16:30, 10 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last
8 days.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 13:21, 10 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of four days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Chetsford (
talk) 15:59, 10 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of four days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. This would probably merit pending protection if not for the sheer volume of edits which would likely overwhelm the PC reviewers.
Chetsford (
talk) 16:03, 10 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – No reason for a non ECP approved editor to be editing here. I have have disruptive editing vandalism before. (please mention me on reply; thanks!) --.
Emir of Wikipedia (
talk) 22:32, 9 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Persistent vandalism and reverts by IP users (or possibly one user with a dynamic IP).
KnowledgeablePersona (
talk) 00:43, 10 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. The problem seems to have stopped. If it reappears, please ask for page protection again.
Cwmhiraeth (
talk) 05:54, 10 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: Vandalism/Unsourced content from unregistered IP users. Frequency to try to change her name is increasing and will continue to increase as subject's marital status and possible divorce continue to spread throughout social media without any reliable sources.
Declined There have only been two IP edits in the last week.
Johnuniq (
talk) 05:58, 10 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. Pending changes is enough for now.
Mike (
talk) 23:50, 9 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: Hot-button, controversial issue with potentially biased, agenda-pushing, and politically motivated edits that I am seeing. Potential place for people to platform disinformation. Other articles related to this incident are also semi-protected, many of them well into 2021.
Lfax-nimbus (
talk) 12:45, 9 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Non-admin commentLfax-nimbus, you cannot requesting a semi-protection of this page only because the page is controversial issue or potentially bias. This article only can be semi-protected if there are persistent vandalism from IPs or arbitration enforcement of the page. As far as i edit the page, i don't see any IP that vandalize the page, all IP edits were in good faith, despite being reverted. In fact, only users who tag edit warring over who involve in the protest.
36.68.193.87 (
talk) 13:54, 9 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of
dispute resolution.
Biblio (
talk) 23:14, 9 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Several instances over the last week of unregistered or newly registered (not yet auto-confirmed) users trying to remove criticism backed by reliable sources from the article's reception section; comes across as if there's some off-site effort to make the article subject look better.--
AlexandraIDV 17:43, 9 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Experienced editors also seem to be involved. Please sort it out on the talk page.
Mike (
talk) 23:54, 9 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection:. DOB of birth has been changed many times by a range of IPs (though I suspect one person). To complicate matters, the user can show one incorrect source, despite being shown evidence to the contrary, so an unsuspecting editor could assume the change was correct.
Doctorhawkes (
talk) 22:07, 9 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Mike (
talk) 23:59, 9 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: High level activity of set of
WP:SPAs. Their aim is to disrupt the article in a vandal way.
Jingiby (
talk) 17:28, 9 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Mike (
talk) 23:45, 9 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Pending changes protection: Protection for vandalism expired a week ago but I think some form of protection needs to be reinstated because IP users like to cause the most trouble here, e.g. the afforementioned vandalism, adding gossip, edit warring, etc.
Trillfendi (
talk) 13:33, 9 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Biblio (
talk) 23:17, 9 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary pending changes: Persistent
vandalism – Various IPs almost on a daily basis keep adding her DOB with no sources, I figured if their edits don't make it live they might get bored of doing this?, Thanks,. –
Davey2010Talk 13:43, 9 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Previously protected, the article has been hit by newly created SPAs who appear to be removing the referenced sections that state the topic is a pseudoscience.
Ifnord (
talk) 14:49, 9 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Already protected by administrator Bishonen.
Biblio (
talk) 23:30, 9 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Returning vandalism from Ip-users ignoring the RFC on the talk page, please protect the page
Xerxes931 (
talk) 19:27, 8 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Automated comment:@
Xerxes931: This request cannot be parsed. Please ensure it follows formatting consistent with the current or previous methods of submission.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 19:35, 8 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism from one IP user who seems to have finally signed up as McMassterCarr1995. Edit warring as well. User or users removed agreed upon-content for biased information on high levels of the page.
InfinityJackson (
talk) 03:29, 9 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Biblio (
talk) 23:07, 9 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Pending-changes protection: Consistent but low level dispute between IP editors and new users over whether this is occupied by Azerbaijan or Armenia.
Roller26 (
talk) 10:24, 9 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Biblio (
talk) 23:13, 9 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Repeated vandalism by IP editors. This seems to happen a lot to this article; so more than the usual one week is likely called for (maybe a month or so).
Also hit repeatedly by one newly-registered editor; but that one has been indef blocked.
TJRC (
talk) 21:22, 9 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last
8 days.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 21:30, 9 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 21:46, 9 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Already protected., for the bot.
(CC)Tbhotch™ 22:41, 9 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing from a few IPs – violations of the
BLP policy. The page was being vandalized before, leading to it being protected from September 25 to October 4; since October 9, the vandalism has resumed.
Twotwice (
talk) 16:04, 11 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Continued trolling and vandalism due to recent events.
clickHereToGoToMyUserPage (
talk) 19:30, 11 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – consistent
WP:EW since last protection template expired.
ChunnuBhai (
talk) 20:42, 11 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 22:03, 11 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – Lots of disruption and very few constructive edits from IPs. It's also a BLP. Giraffermunch 14:52, 11 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Persistent vandalism from same person using IP proxies. ɴᴋᴏɴ21❯❯❯talk 21:23, 11 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk) 21:37, 11 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Number of vandalism recently. Page was totally vandalised. Request for 6 months of protection. -- Manasbose (
talk |
contribs) 07:36, 11 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 21:18, 11 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. The history of vandalism doesn't appear to justify six months of protection. I've protected the page for a week, and if the issue recurs we can institute escalating periods of protection.
GorillaWarfare(talk) 21:22, 11 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – IPs and some newly created users disrupting the article. Keeps adding unsourced phrase "Muslim men" in the article and also keeps modifying source titles and URLs. See
[21],
[22],
[23]Fylindfotberserk (
talk) 12:01, 11 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Looks at
this. Phrase added "from most peaceful community of earth". -
Fylindfotberserk (
talk) 12:06, 11 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 17:30, 11 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – Some IP users disrupt the list of countries; e.g. removing countries, changing continent/region, and breaking A-Z order.
Wario-Man (
talk) 06:33, 11 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – The IP address that was previously banned, and is still on a 3 month block
see here has returned and is again attempting to insert incorrect information in the article, or remove correct information. We can of course ban this IP also, but if they are a dynamic IP as WHOIS suggests then this seems futile.
Koncorde (
talk) 09:52, 11 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Started back again when previous protection ended on September 28th.
S0091 (
talk) 17:40, 11 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection. —
Wug·a·po·des 02:37, 11 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 13:29, 11 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Already protected by administrator Yamla.
Favonian (
talk) 16:23, 11 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Anarchyte (
talk •
work) 14:09, 11 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. If the IP persists, report to
WP:AIVCwmhiraeth (
talk) 09:13, 11 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary Extended Confirmed protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Contentious medical issue much in the news, IPs and SPAs making wrecking edits.
GPinkerton (
talk) 22:43, 10 October 2020 (UTC)reply
GPinkerton has now twice-deleted an "undue weight" tag added to a section in which he was the primary author of additional content. The section in question contains a list of criticisms of the article's subject and is now 4x the length of the main body of the article itself. I have made multiple attempts to raise this issue on the article's talk page, to no avail.
MadScientistDoctor (
talk) 22:56, 10 October 2020 (UTC)reply
User
GPinkerton is actually one of the problem editors here. EP wouldn't exclude him. No protection is necessary at the moment. Maybe topic bans, but I think we've a long way to go yet before that becomes necessary. Suggest leave as is for the time being. I think lots of editors are watching this article.
Arcturus (
talk) 23:11, 10 October 2020 (UTC)reply
These comments, especially those from the SPA, are as groundless as they are silly. The page history speaks for itself.
GPinkerton (
talk) 23:44, 10 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Non-admin commentGPinkerton as you are part of problem, semi-protection would be necessary as not even edits are autoconfirmed users.
36.68.193.87 (
talk) 01:13, 11 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Declined People seem to be discussing on talk. I left the above editors GS alerts and added the page to my watch list. —
Wug·a·po·des 02:06, 11 October 2020 (UTC)reply
@
Wugapodes: Please reconsider; look at the state the article is in
now, particularly the keyboard-punching in the lead and uncited editorializing. I don't want to revert anymore.
GPinkerton (
talk) 03:53, 11 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Spate of vandalism and BLP violations in the last week, some of which are rather problematic.
Hog FarmBacon 02:57, 11 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Cwmhiraeth (
talk) 08:52, 11 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – User kept on removing original distributor and used name calling games.
FilmandTVFan28 (
talk) 19:00, 10 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Not done The LTA IP was blocked two hours ago and hasn't edited since. This was the first edit in about a month, so they might not be back soon. If they are, report again or leave a message on my talk. —
Wug·a·po·des 02:36, 11 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Unsuppress history: Miscatagorised as Fair US, below TOO:US.
17jiangz1 (
talk) 21:40, 7 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Wrong venue? This seems to be a request for undeletion rather than lowering protection. --
Malcolmxl5 (
talk) 12:07, 9 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Not done The deleted revision is different than the current ones, and is not PD unlike the visible files. It was properly revision deleted. —
Wug·a·po·des 02:14, 11 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Persistent addition of unsourced content from a variety of IP addresses.
BOVINEBOY2008 15:22, 10 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Pending protection: There's a decent amount of regular vandalism. I had some time over to sit and do "nothing", so I looked through the history page and found no less than 30 occasions of outright vandalism during the past 500 edits going back to August 2011. All are from IPs and new accounts, where almost all are from IPs.
The occasions are on 9 September 2020, 21 May 2020, 3 February 2020, 2 July 2019, 30 May 2019, 3 April 2019, 30 January 2019, 19 and 12 September 2017, 10 January 2017, 29 September 2016, 9 and 4 July 2016, 31 May 2016, 23 July 2015
22 February 2015, 8 September 2014, 21 November 2013, 3 September 2013, 29, 8 and 7 January 2013, 7 December 2012, 21 October 2012, 4 September 2012, 16 July 2012, 16 February 2012, 8 January 2012, 26 November 2011, 8 October 2011.
Some more are bad edits in good faith from mostly IPs. The vast majority of IP edits overall in later years are bad. I don't know if this level of vandalism is enough to warrant a (pending changes) protection or if it's considered an acceptable level, and if warranted, for how long, but that is partly why I ask. --
Mango från yttre rymden (
talk) 15:59, 10 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. This looks like recent changes patrolers can handle it. I would add pending changes protection if there were problems of subtle vandalism, but it looks like a combination of
WP:BRD and occasional vandalism. If things get worse let me know. —
Wug·a·po·des 01:30, 11 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – The user who hates My Little Pony: The Movie (2017) is at it again.
FilmandTVFan28 (
talk) 18:25, 10 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing especially on the episode names. Television series is still ongoing and airs weekly.
Emperork (
talk) 18:44, 10 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Too wide for a range block IMO, but it might be another option if problems continue. —
Wug·a·po·des 01:47, 11 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Long-term semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing by an IP hopper. Reporting the IPs won't stop the IP ranges unless the IPs are range-blocked.
Flyer22 Frozen (
talk) 02:22, 11 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. If things start up again after a month, we an protect for longer. —
Wug·a·po·des 02:31, 11 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Vandalism from the first game's page spread here after its semi-protection. O.N.R.(talk) 07:26, 10 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —
Wug·a·po·des 01:05, 11 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – IP vandalism from the time he was rumoured to be the coach of
East Bengal F.C. and after the announcement, vandalism has increased. As the article is a GA, it needs protection. ❯❯❯ S A H A 07:26, 10 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —
Wug·a·po·des 01:07, 11 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Hello, I'm a target of cross-wiki harassment - please read on meta
m:User:Bédévore/Harassment. Could you please SP my talk page against vandalism-only accounts ? Thanks. - -
Bédévore[knock knock] 10:22, 10 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —
Wug·a·po·des 01:15, 11 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – Content warring by an IP editor, already going on for more than a week. Suggested block duration: 2–4 weeks. —
kashmīrīTALK 15:30, 10 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of
dispute resolution.
Chetsford (
talk) 16:08, 10 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – User keeps changing the cast list without a solid reason.
FilmandTVFan28 (
talk) 18:04, 10 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk) 18:08, 10 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Reduction in protection level: From full protection to extended confirmed protection for creation (their might be users trying to recreate article in bad or promotional manner but extended confirmed protection is enough). Reason - subject might qualify notability now so article may be created in future. However, request via draft is an option still we can lower the protection so that this can be easier for reviewers to accept draft after proper creation and qualifying all policies. (I have contacted the admin who deleted and protected the article but he is no longer interested in the subject)
Pratyush.shrivastava (
talk) 16:47, 9 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Are you sure you spelled the name right? This article title is not protected. And which admin did you ask?
EdJohnston (
talk) 16:52, 9 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Hello Pratyush. You submitted a request for
Vaibhav Palhad, which seems to be a misspelling. I've now fixed the name above to
Vaibhav Palhade, and will take another look. Thanks to
User:Malcolmxl5 for the note. Pratyush, if you discussed this with
User:Dreamy Jazz, can you tell me where that occurred?
EdJohnston (
talk) 15:58, 10 October 2020 (UTC)reply
I still doubt that Vaibhav Palhade is actually notable, so I'm not going to remove create protection in the mainspace until a draft with sufficient notability is created. This is per the two AfDs and also due to the cross-wiki socking promoting this person (4 reports for this sockmaster in the archive) by
Viralvilla and their socks up until around a little over a month and a half ago. If a draft is created which is suitable for mainspace (i.e. the subject is notable etc.), any AfC reviewer can ping me (or request here) to request the page protection be lowered. I oppose unsalting the mainspace title until there is a draft which is notable / it has been reviewed at AfC.
Dreamy Jazztalk to me | my contributions 16:46, 10 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Sorry
Dreamy Jazz, I was little confused, accept my sincere apologies. I remember now, I contacted
User:Materialscientist for reviewing and providing draft and maybe he was busy. Thank you for understanding it. Also, I understand the subject of this article must go through AFC process.
Pratyush.shrivastava (
talk) 16:55, 10 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary pending changes: Persistent
vandalism – 1 IP determined to add nonsense to the page, as soon as they were blocked another IP starts with the same content.
JW 1961Talk 17:40, 12 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Note: Rangeblock is now in place and seems to have worked
JW 1961Talk 18:03, 12 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – School page prone to anonymous/new account vandalism primarily by students/young people.
Lewis Cawte (
Talk) 17:51, 12 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. Only two instances of IP vandalism this month. -- LuK3(Talk) 19:09, 12 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – Long-term abuse from Campo Grande, Brazil, using multiple IPs.
Binksternet (
talk) 04:40, 12 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of
dispute resolution.
Cwmhiraeth (
talk) 09:09, 12 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Today's Featured List on Main Page. Vandalism just started and I'm sure more attempts will be on the way. Please fully-protect from anon editing, etc.
Shearonink (
talk) 02:51, 12 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Cwmhiraeth (
talk) 06:25, 12 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent
sockpuppetry – The Tom and Jerry Vandal is at it again.
FilmandTVFan28 (
talk) 08:18, 12 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., I am hesitant to indefinitely semi-protect a talk page. May be an edit filter could do the job.--
Ymblanter (
talk) 10:44, 12 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent
sockpuppetry – An unregistered user from Asia kept replacing Lionsgate with Universal without a solid reason.
FilmandTVFan28 (
talk) 08:45, 12 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk) 10:16, 12 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Frequent vandalism to inappropriately include mentions of the subject's past appearances in pornographic films.
LM2000 (
talk) 02:20, 12 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Cwmhiraeth (
talk) 06:37, 12 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – repeated addition of unsourced material by IP editors.
Joeyconnick (
talk) 05:54, 12 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk) 07:32, 12 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. At least 2 IPs and 2 different Non-autoconfirmed users repeating same nonsense in last few months
194.28.127.54 (
talk) 00:37, 12 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Declined –
Warn the user appropriately then report them to
AIV or
ANI if they continue. This is all one IP address, so page protection seems like an overly broad solution. I've left a warning for the user.
GorillaWarfare(talk) 21:22, 11 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: Extend protection. Recent user created account with the purpose to vandalise including blanking, redirecting and ignoring discussions on talk page.
JPA24 (
talk) 14:23, 11 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 14:29, 11 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Question: I see the page is already protected until 27 October 2020. I would want to wait until the page is unprotected. And then if vandalism occurs again, you can requesting semi-protected for it.
36.68.193.87 (
talk) 14:32, 11 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Full protection: This module is regularly used on the
Main Page, where it gets covered by the Main Page's cascading protection. It's risk level isn't meaningfully lower when it happens not to be used there.
* Pppery *it has begun... 18:11, 11 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 18:16, 11 October 2020 (UTC)reply
It's already cascade protected. I'm requesting a full protection on top of the cascade protection.
* Pppery *it has begun... 18:20, 11 October 2020 (UTC)reply
@
Pppery: Just to clarify, are you asking for the existing protection level (template editors only) to be increased to admin protection? Or do you think the template editor protection is sufficient?
GorillaWarfare(talk) 22:13, 11 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Fully protectedindefinitely. Thanks for clarifying. I think that makes sense given its high usage and extremely stable condition (six edits since its creation in 2013).
GorillaWarfare(talk) 22:21, 11 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: This television presenter who hosted shows such as the second host of Password Plus, the ‘70s version of Name That Tune; and the cult favorite Whew! from the late 70s/early 80s is reportly to have passed away this past Wednesday, I think semi protecting this article until a news source confirms his death is the best option for this article to avoid edit warring about whether or not he is dead or he is still alive.
Pahiy (
talk) 19:59, 11 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – Just read the edit summaries from the two red-linked usernames from the past few days. Talk of Zionist Jews and the user's own penis is just some of it. Crossroads-talk- 03:03, 13 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. and blocked two accounts for obvious sockpuppeting and NOTHERE. Also placing semiprotection due to the presence of other possibly related accounts with similar editing patterns. signed, Rosguilltalk 22:36, 13 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – IP editors editing against consensus and refusing to discuss on Talk page.
Joeyconnick (
talk) 05:42, 12 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. –
Muboshgu (
talk) 20:17, 13 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – There has been a sudden surge in IP's editing the article to add BLP violations.
Koncorde (
talk) 13:32, 13 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. –
Muboshgu (
talk) 20:12, 13 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
edit warring by
Gojo Bonito, user is continuing his edit warring after the article recently became unprotected.
TheDeviantPro (
talk) 16:02, 13 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Unprotection: The iPhone is expected to be announced in a few hours (1 PM E.T.). Thanoscar21talk,
contribs 14:12, 13 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to have already been unprotected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 18:36, 13 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – IP editors making unsourced changes and refusing to discuss on Talk page.
Joeyconnick (
talk) 05:35, 12 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. –
Muboshgu (
talk) 18:38, 13 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism. & Being only with a few impossible edits — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
I love soda (
talk •
contribs) 18:24, 10 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Automated comment:@
I love soda: This request cannot be parsed. Please ensure it follows formatting consistent with the current or previous methods of submission.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 18:38, 10 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. —
Wug·a·po·des 01:35, 11 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – As prevention from
trolls, this disambiguation page will be semi-protected permanently.
The Houndsworth (
talk) 13:43, 13 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 14:18, 13 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Already protected by administrator Drmies. Indef is premature.
Favonian (
talk) 15:54, 13 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Disruptive editing. This article has seen a number bizarre edits and self-reverts from a single IP over the past couple of weeks. a Twitter bot account has detected it's originating from an Australian government department.
https://twitter.com/AussieParlEdits/status/1315505868880871425 mayhaps the IP needs to be blocked? --
Tytrox (
talk) 05:20, 12 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Pending changes protection: This article have repeatedly been used for self promotion.
Trade (
talk) 11:17, 12 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. The page is an open invitation!
Cwmhiraeth (
talk) 06:06, 13 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection:vandalism. The entries in the "See also" section are being manimpulated by malicious and suspicious people from off site. Proof here:
on an external site
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Lectonar (
talk) 11:44, 13 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Variable IP user who does not communicate reverting to version of having two inaugural presidents (LOL) and a monthly salary of 1,000 pesos, way less than the ~13,000 minimum wage in
Metro Manila (LOL).
Howard the Duck (
talk) 15:38, 12 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Cwmhiraeth (
talk) 06:30, 13 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – Persistent addition of unnecessary, irrelevant and unsourced content by IP users, even after the edits are reverted.
KaitoNkmra23talk 12:10, 12 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Cwmhiraeth (
talk) 06:22, 13 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – Persistent addition of unnecessary, irrelevant and unsourced content by IP users, even after the edits are reverted.
KaitoNkmra23talk 12:13, 12 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Cwmhiraeth (
talk) 06:24, 13 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 00:11, 13 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Non-admin comment As far as I see the article, I cannot see any IP vandalism when edit the article.
Chennai Passangai, please don't requesting the protection unless there are high level of IP vandalism in the article.
36.68.193.87 (
talk) 19:55, 12 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. I can't see much in the way of persistent vandalism. Only one revert in the last week and the remaining IP edits seem to be constructive.
Kosack (
talk) 21:13, 12 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: Disruptive edits from new/unregistered users..
Citing (
talk) 18:06, 14 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Already protected by administrator GorillaWarfare. Fully protected for 2 days, to be precise.
Favonian (
talk) 18:30, 14 October 2020 (UTC)reply
User(s)
blocked. Breaking news: protection lifted after one of the parties got blocked for sockpuppetry.
Favonian (
talk) 18:39, 14 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary pending changes: Persistent
vandalism – Persistent low level vandalism by IP's and some new users over the last week.
JW 1961Talk 20:37, 14 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- LuK3(Talk) 20:39, 14 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: BLP experiencing persistent IP vandalism. This is most recently evident today but is part of a similar pattern of behaviour by IPs that has been going on for months.
Richard Nevell (
talk) 12:48, 13 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: Lots of persistent vandalism over the past week, vandalising names of real people, seems possibly the same person
TheFallenPower (
talk) 19:29, 14 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk) 20:27, 14 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Vandalism by changing ip.
W42 14:49, 14 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 16:34, 14 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive edits to
WP:BLP.
NedFausa (
talk) 16:15, 14 October 2020 (UTC)reply
PLEASE ATTEND. Attack on
WP:BLP has been ongoing for 19½ hours.
NedFausa (
talk) 19:27, 14 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --
Bongwarrior (
talk) 20:07, 14 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – IP jumping vandal repeatedly adding same false info over last three weeks.
Escape Orbit(Talk) 16:56, 14 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 17:34, 14 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Note: that it was
Rathfelder himself that was adding the unsourced material. This request is solely a shabby attempt at stopping those who were removing the unsourced change. However, I have now sourced it so Rathfelder's edit warring should now be at an end.
86.164.169.96 (
talk) 13:59, 13 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Non-admin comment I now agree with 86.164.169.96 because IMO, it is more likely a content dispute between
Rathfelder and
86.164.169.96 rather than vandalism. Edit warring also surface between two users.
36.68.193.87 (
talk) 14:42, 13 October 2020 (UTC)reply
It should be made clear that three editors were involved, but I was not edit warring as I only made one revert of the unsourced material (once you ignore the second revert which I immediately reversed with the missing supporting reference).
86.164.169.96 (
talk) 16:13, 13 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection.
Lectonar (
talk) 06:32, 14 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – BLP subject to numerous unreferenced additions and vandalism due to subject being mentioned in press rumours re transfer of clubs.
Egghead06 (
talk) 13:39, 14 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Kosack (
talk) 18:52, 14 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection IP editor persistently attempting to remove sourced information without attempting to reach consensus on talk page.
PatGallacher (
talk) 18:17, 14 October 2020 (UTC)reply
No. You're consistently readding information without effectively discussing on talk. This is a content dispute where your bold addition is challenged and you don't like it so you revert before consensus is reached on talk. There are clear attempts to reach consensus on talk and you'll are trying to bully through your version
94.204.247.58 (
talk) 18:35, 14 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Note; this article is now fully protected for a week, so leave it for the time being.
PatGallacher (
talk) 18:47, 14 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Full protection: Edit war involving multiple users on the infobox image.
219.78.190.231 (
talk) 15:09, 13 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of
dispute resolution. Too early to fully shut down the whole article.
Lectonar (
talk) 13:48, 14 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Ongoing edit war over whether to include potentially UNDUE and BLP violating information.
Gbear605 (
talk) 16:00, 13 October 2020 (UTC)reply
The edit war died down shortly after I made this request; no protection needed for now.
Gbear605 (
talk) 13:48, 14 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Withdrawn by requestor
Lectonar (
talk) 13:49, 14 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 09:40, 9 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Connormah I'm not sure why an IP would need the move protection lowered, but you are the one who in 2015 applied the move protection from auto confirmed to sysop. I changed the edit protection to full back in 2016.
— Maile (
talk) 10:37, 9 October 2020 (UTC)reply
— Maile Why did you do change the move protection level to full? This request is only for reducing move level protection to Extended Confirmed. --
37.29.128.151 (
talk) 16:11, 9 October 2020 (UTC)reply
I did not change the move protection. Connormah changed it to indefinitely "[move=sysop] (indefinite)" in 2015, which is the same thing as full move protection. I changed the edit protection in 2016 to auto-confirmed, per a request on this page. I guess the template wording changed before then, because it said "[Move=Require administrator access]". Sysops are admins. No one has made changes since 2016.
— Maile (
talk) 16:28, 9 October 2020 (UTC)reply
IP, why do you want the protection reduced? Do you intend to move the page with an account? --
Malcolmxl5 (
talk) 18:02, 9 October 2020 (UTC)reply
It doesn't make sense to leave full protection when this page doesn't have a single move log entry. I do not intend on moving it with any account at all. Full move protection should be for persistent vandalistic moves by Extended Confirmed Users in my opinion. --
94.73.37.114 (
talk) 18:21, 9 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Not you registered editors, only the IP editors. --
94.73.37.114 (
talk) 19:25, 9 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Declined Procedural, as this has not been acted upon until now; the move protection does not hurt anyone when a move is not intended.
Lectonar (
talk) 13:45, 14 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. I see no vandalism in the last 4 days, just one IP edit which might be called disruptive.
Lectonar (
talk) 10:58, 14 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent
sockpuppetry – I had my old messages archived a week ago and the Tom and Jerry vandal keeps bringing them back.
FilmandTVFan28 (
talk) 11:59, 13 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Note: The IP has been globally locked for a period of one month.
— Maile (
talk) 22:57, 13 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Declined See above, should be ok for now.
Lectonar (
talk) 10:59, 14 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of
unsourced or poorly sourced content – Content that is subtly different from the source material, when any sources are cited at all. Vanamonde (
Talk) 15:08, 13 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Semi-protection would be overkill; this is rather slow.
Lectonar (
talk) 13:47, 14 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Persistent long-term vandalism to article, especially by sock-hopping IP address, that violates multiple Wikipedia policies. livelikemusic(
TALK!) 12:56, 14 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- LuK3(Talk) 13:17, 14 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: Persistent
sockpuppetry – Persistent removal of negative reception, has been apparently going on for a while, check page history. ɴᴋᴏɴ21❯❯❯talk 05:04, 14 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last
8 days.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 05:14, 14 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 05:29, 14 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Already protected.
Lectonar (
talk) 11:00, 14 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Repeated vandalism by ips and newly created accounts.
Greyjoytalk 07:44, 14 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 10:46, 14 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Already protected.
Lectonar (
talk) 11:01, 14 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 23:09, 13 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Already protected.
Lectonar (
talk) 07:01, 14 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Persistent vandalism to article over long-term period of time by sock-hopping user. livelikemusic(
TALK!) 17:00, 13 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: Increasing IP vandalism, all useful contributions so far from registered users,
Gam-COVID-Vac has similar protection, article will likely become more controversial, not less in following few months.
Albertaont (
talk) 18:03, 13 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Non-admin commentAlbertaont, pages cannot be protected preemptively only because it is controversial page. But if protection needs to guaranteed, it can be imposed as part of COVID-related sanctions. Do you see any increasing vandalism in the page?
36.68.193.87 (
talk) 23:17, 13 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Correct, two IP vandalisms yesterday. Although it may just be they did not know what they were doing, i.e. adding random broken links. Yes, it makes sense for the article at this stage to be part of COVID-related sanctions.
Albertaont (
talk) 23:30, 13 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – It was moved to draftspace on 3 October 2020 due to it being undersourced. The creator submitted it three times and has been rejected as not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The creator has recreated the article in mainspace. Requesting creation protection.
Steven (Editor) (
talk) 19:44, 13 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Declined This is an issue with a single user, and should be addressed with user restrictions rather than page restrictions. Would recommend bringing them to ANI should it recur.
GorillaWarfare(talk) 02:30, 14 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. I've blocked the latest vandal. Despite a few vandals in the past few days, I'm not seeing sufficient activity to justify ECP. Would consider temporary semiprotection if the vandalism/sockpuppetry continues.
GorillaWarfare(talk) 02:16, 14 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – Multiple new editors/IPs have added that this is some sort of cryptid, based on a recent Youtube video where someone made that up.
power~enwiki (
π,
ν) 17:29, 13 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism.
FDW777 (
talk) 20:06, 13 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 01:11, 14 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Persistent addition of player's new "name", which he borrowed from an anime character and announced on social media.
BlameRuiner (
talk) 20:30, 13 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – persistent vandalism from what appears to be the same person using multiple IPs.
GPL93 (
talk) 20:59, 13 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 23:09, 13 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: As soon as protection expired, some person using a proxy started vandalizing. Gatemansgc (
TɅ̊LK) 23:36, 13 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 23:55, 13 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 01:11, 14 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
sockpuppetry – Page is current target of the Cutler LTA who add unsourced and often defamatory /
WP:FRINGE material to articles. Ravensfire (
talk) 16:18, 12 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary full protection: Could an administrator please look at recent edits by
Nikkimaria on this article. There is a discussion on the talk where this user is arguing one way and two of us are arguing the other way. This user persists in trying to get his own way. I am a former administrator and my judgement is that his edit should be reverted and the page protected. It certainly needs new eyes looking at it. --
Bduke (
talk) 02:34, 13 October 2020 (UTC)reply
I agree. --
evrik(
talk) 02:45, 13 October 2020 (UTC)reply
I disagree. Every single editor involved there is a very experienced editor. Should be capable of sorting this out without resorting to edit warring and protections. It's not like this is being hammered by new editors, outright vandalized or subjected to canvassing.
Canterbury Tailtalk 12:57, 13 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Declined, content dispute which appears to be on its way to a resolution on the talk page. signed, Rosguilltalk 22:21, 13 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Dubious account of 2 edits removing cited content.
Beshogur (
talk) 10:35, 12 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Non-admin commentBeshogur, I see there are more likely a content dispute/edit warring in the article because one user reverting their edits based on sourced content, so IMO temporary full protection would be necessary until consensus reach on talk page.
36.68.193.87 (
talk) 10:44, 12 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of
dispute resolution. –
Muboshgu (
talk) 20:15, 13 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: Persistent silly and non-constructive edits since June, apparently made by denizens of Twitch.
Quale (
talk) 07:17, 13 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. signed, Rosguilltalk 22:52, 13 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary Semi-protection: This individual has recently been implicated in a scandal and as a result the original bio photo has been replaced with a still from an exposé documentary. The page is likely to be subject to further modifications based on the revelations. The
media has even commented on the new photo appearing in the bio.
Clucky192 (
talk) 07:50, 13 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ongoing IP disruption already present. signed, Rosguilltalk 22:54, 13 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Recent persistent addition of unreferenced irrelevant text (stating that the channel started in the 19th century!) from a variety of IP addresses.
LukeSurltc 09:04, 15 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk) 22:25, 15 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: for 2 months till the season is over. Persistent addition of unsourced data and vandalism by IP addresses.
Roller26 (
talk) 09:57, 15 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Fully protected for a period of 24 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Edit war going on over which of two pictures to use. Being discussed at the talk page, hopefully consensus will emerge.
MelanieN (
talk) 22:36, 15 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: Date of birth has been changed on page 30 times by unregistered users, going back 17 months.
Doctorhawkes (
talk) 08:27, 15 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk) 22:02, 15 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 17:15, 15 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection:BLP policy violations – This page has been protected in the past, but as soon as expiration expires
same libellous edits are made. A longer protection period might do the trick.
Paul ❬
talk❭ 07:55, 15 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Favonian (
talk) 17:28, 15 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Note: Personally, I would decline per
WP:PREEMPT, but FAQ and consensus subpages like this tend to get protected anyway. I'll leave the decision up to someone else. —
Wug·a·po·des 00:24, 15 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – Ongoing disruptive editing my an IP user who has been repeatedly blocked on various IPs.
Nat Gertler (
talk) 04:18, 15 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Mifter (
talk) 05:11, 15 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing by IPs. Inserting the fan made "lineal title" into the record table which goes against
MOS:BOXING/WEIGHT as well as
NPOV.
2.
O.
Boxing 11:04, 15 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk) 11:09, 15 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Note: A request for unprotection is not the right venue to have an article reviewed, imho. Once the draft is accepted, the article title is easy enough to unprotect, but it won't be unprotected unless the draft is accepted.
Lectonar (
talk) 11:53, 13 October 2020 (UTC)reply
@
Lectonar: Per the above discussions, nobody seems to have objected to accepting the draft, however no admin has unsalted the page. I came to RPP because BD2412, the original protecting admin, declined to comment on the matter and said I should ask an uninvolved administrator. As the draft cannot be accepted until someone unsalts the title, I'm not sure what the next step here is.
Nathan2055talk -
contribs 03:15, 14 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Actually, the draft can be accepted without unsalting the article; just the following move to mainspace isn't possible without unprotecting....so, the draft still is technically under review, and the last remarks by the reviewers did not leave me with the impression that it would be accepted in the current version. Regards.
Lectonar (
talk) 05:54, 14 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Persistent vandalism to article over long-term period of time. livelikemusic(
TALK!) 16:59, 13 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. —
Wug·a·po·des 01:16, 15 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary extended confirmed protection: Content dispute / edit warring. Disruptive and bad faith edits by McMasterCarr1995. The user has deleted and edited quoted material, has input poor-quality editorial type material in higher levels of a political page, has failed to cite the material, has failed to respond to at least one warning, and has failed to turn to the talk page for any type of consensus, where there more or less already was consensus. It is clearly the user is here to turn this page into an editorial, without balance. Please revert the page if it is vandalized and ban the user.
InfinityJackson (
talk) 17:21, 14 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Declined In favor of discretionary sanctions —
Wug·a·po·des 01:28, 15 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary extended confirmed protection: Content dispute / edit warring. User InfinityJackson has deleted large(20,000+ byte) swaths of content on the article without proper explanation. It is clear that the user's only motive is to stifle any expression that doesn't align with his. InfinityJackson has also published editorialized and biased content. Please ban the user
InfinityJackson and revert any affected material. Once again, a ban on the user InfinityJackson would be the best course of action here.
McMasterCarr1995 (
talk) 17:33, 14 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Hmmm, why did you
remove part of a signed edit from another user? The Bannertalk 18:19, 14 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: This user who requested protection has been blocked.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 18:20, 14 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Declined In favor of discretionary sanctions —
Wug·a·po·des 01:28, 15 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing by user who may continue doing so after his 31 hour block ends. Semi-Protection or Pending changes requested on that article.
BattleshipMan (
talk) 22:38, 14 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Persistant vandalism on this page. One clearly disruptive edit went unreverted for hours. Probably needs protected.
The Irate Communist (
talk) 13:52, 14 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Declined Stale, but I added it to my watchlist. I'll protect if it picks up again. —
Wug·a·po·des 00:28, 15 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Note:Prolix, This is more likely a content dispute regarding changing photos in Narendra Modi, so I refer to report that user to
WP:AIV. You can also reporting that user named
INDV100 to
ANI because only this user that conduct distruptive behaviour.
36.68.193.87 (
talk) 07:42, 14 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. signed, Rosguilltalk 22:52, 14 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. I see two vandals in the last 2 weeks. OhNoitsJamieTalk 23:23, 14 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Fully protected for a period of 31 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Looks like a content dispute. Participants need to discuss changes on the talk page, not edit summaries. —
Wug·a·po·des 00:57, 15 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Non-admin comment Doesn't it need to be protected under COVID-related sanctions?
36.68.193.87 (
talk) 01:07, 15 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Not as a general sanction though, seems like typical block evasion. —
Wug·a·po·des 01:14, 15 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Indefinite pending changes:BLP policy violations – Clymer is trans, and her article has been the subject of pronoun vandalism for quite some time. It's not particularly frequent, but it has been constant basically since the article was created.
GorillaWarfare(talk) 21:03, 14 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 31 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. If it needs protection again after that, let me know and I'll extend. —
Wug·a·po·des 00:45, 15 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Indefinite protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – Newly registered users creating accounts just to change to his ancestry from Lebanese to Syrian or to Syrian Lebanese even after long discussions on his Talk Page and primary sources (aubiography and radio talk interview) where Anka specifies his parents are both of Lebanese ancestry not Syrian nor both. A note was added a while ago on the respective part of his wikibio about not changing his ancestry and pointing to Talk Page for evidence/sources/discussion but the note is being constantly disregarded
Chris O' Hare (
talk) 22:09, 14 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Fully protected for a period of 31 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Use the talk page, not edit summaries. —
Wug·a·po·des 00:48, 15 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – Persistent addition of unsourced/incorrect and more important addition of rumoured players name in the article both by IPs and newly registered users. I would ask to protect the page with ECP for atleast 2 to 3 months.
Drat8sub (
talk) 22:12, 14 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. If problems continue, let me know and I can raise the level or extend the duration. —
Wug·a·po·des 00:51, 15 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Some IP users are adding unsourced contents and removing sourced contents .
WhiteFalcon1 (
talk) 16:57, 14 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 31 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. if it continues after that let me know and I'll extend the protection. —
Wug·a·po·des 00:35, 15 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – I would like to semi-protect this article due to persistent vandalism from unregistered users. These include, but aren't limited to, adding programs that don't exist or air on the block such as Oobi, and other types of vandalism. Can you protect this article for at least 3 months? Thanks.
Marioedit8 (
talk) 23:07, 13 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. If the editor comes back after a month, let me know and I can extend it. —
Wug·a·po·des 00:14, 15 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --
Bongwarrior (
talk) 23:31, 14 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --
Bongwarrior (
talk) 23:27, 14 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – Various IP addresses are lowering the poverty line from the upper-middle income poverty line of $5.50/day to the low-income poverty line of
$1.90/day (Indonesia is an upper-middle income country). Indefinite protection because I think it will persist until the upper-middle income poverty ratio drops low enough to not give a reason to arbitrarily lower the poverty line.
ᐱᔌᕬᐱɭᕮ ᐱᒍᐱᕬ(Talk) 05:54, 14 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Non-admin comment I see there are very low vandalism and distruptive editing happened in the article, so indefinite pending changes protection would be better handle that edit to prevent the distruptive editing. The IP vandalism last happened few days ago so PC would be ensured that.
36.68.193.87 (
talk) 07:44, 14 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – The page is about a person who already passed away a year ago, but there are persistent
disruptive editing almost daily. The page has been protected 3 times since the subject's death but the disruptive editing keep happening as soon as the page is unlocked. The same thing was also happening to
Kim Jong-hyun (singer) but it was protected indefinite.
CherryPie94 🍒🥧 (
talk) 08:33, 14 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. signed, Rosguilltalk 22:58, 14 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 09:00, 14 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Vandalism has increased significantly while still under pending changes protection, page has been consistently protected in the past.
FozzieHey (
talk) 09:30, 14 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. signed, Rosguilltalk 23:01, 14 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – I am requesting that the page semi-protected for 1 week as only edit permission for autoconfirmed group users.
Al Riaz Uddin (
talk) 15:01, 16 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk) 21:59, 16 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Different IP's repeatedly replacing the same sourced content with no explanation.
SUN EYE 1 16:08, 16 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk) 22:01, 16 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
sockpuppetry – A few days after the prior semi-protection expired, IP socks from the same sockmaster returned. Ravensfire (
talk) 18:15, 16 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary full protection: overzealous changes and subsequent reversions to
WP:POLICY that originated from
WP:POINTY behavior or
WP:FORCEDINTERPRET - see discussion on talk page.
Toddst1 (
talk) 05:41, 16 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Declined I'd been following the edits from my watchlist. Protection might have been justified a few hours ago, but the edit war seems to have cooled down. At this point I think protection would make the situation worse, not better. I'll keep this request in mind next time changes pop up on my watchlist in case the edit war starts back up. —
Wug·a·po·des 17:55, 16 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection. continuous deletion of cited info and addition of uncited - 95 edits this month and we are, again, back to the version at the beginning of the month -
Arjayay (
talk) 16:07, 16 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —
Wug·a·po·des 18:32, 16 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – The last protection due to the Catch the loosers LTA expired today. It evidently was nessesary.
Victor Schmidt (
talk) 18:23, 16 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Already protected. for the bot.
(CC)Tbhotch™ 18:47, 16 October 2020 (UTC)reply
@
Primefac: What do you think? The template has almost 20,000 transclusions and you ECP protected it in February 2018. It was last edited in mid August (edits which should have been in the sandbox) by two non-TE editors. I'm happy to elevate to TE protection or leave it.
Johnuniq (
talk) 03:53, 16 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Johnuniq, that's an interesting little edit war. I'd say it's enough to merit a return to TE; that sort of thing shouldn't be happening ona template that heavily-used.
Primefac (
talk) 13:47, 16 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Indefinite semi-protection or, failing that, pending changes protection: persistent vandalism: a majority of IP and new account edits for over a year now have been vandalism of the pronouns, or occasionally other IPs / new editors changing the pronouns back but in an inept find-and-replace way that has resulted in pronouns inside quotations/headlines being changed, which is also inappropriate.
-sche (
talk) 15:39, 16 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Too son for indefinite protection of any kind, but let's see how PC protection goes. If problems persist, let me know and we can raise or extend it as needed. —
Wug·a·po·des 18:08, 16 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection.Idell (
talk) 15:54, 16 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 31 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. It looks vaguely like an edit war where one anon keeps trying to edit the table and the other keeps reverting it without notifying the other anon (except by edit summary which they likely aren't seeing). Hopefully the protection and log entry get the two to stop cluttering the edit history and use the talk page. —
Wug·a·po·des 18:15, 16 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism.
Jingiby (
talk) 11:47, 16 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Fully protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. This is a content dispute. Anarchyte (
talk •
work) 14:38, 16 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Edit-warring by several IP editors speculating over an upcoming episode that has not yet been officially announced.
Areaseven (
talk) 11:59, 16 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. Anarchyte (
talk •
work) 14:39, 16 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Unprotection: Unprotection due to lack of popularity. Cambodia national football team isn't that famous like Mexico, Egypt or Peru. Such protection for football team should only be required for more popular national football sides.
ZaDoraemonzu (
talk) 06:06, 16 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Declined Articles about football teams are prone to disruption and vandalism regardless of popularity.
Lectonar (
talk) 09:08, 16 October 2020 (UTC)reply
I doubt it. Nobody knows how good Cambodian players are, and even spelling their players' names is a problem enough. I won't oppose protection for FC Barcelona, Real Madrid, Mexico, Colombia or Ukraine, however. Besides, Cambodians have their responsibility for their national team, they have to know better.
ZaDoraemonzu (
talk) 09:51, 16 October 2020 (UTC)reply
ZaDoraemonzu, sorry, but none of those things have much to do with the matter at hand.
Drmies (
talk) 13:55, 16 October 2020 (UTC)reply
I mean, why would people try to vandalize Cambodian national football team article anyway when Cambodia itself is not known in world's football map? It's unnecessary.
ZaDoraemonzu (
talk) 14:27, 16 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Lectonar, I had a vague memory of socking and my note confirms that, though I do not recollect who or what that was. There's a sock, User:Kwamrak]], in the history, but I don't remember if that's what it was; if I had to guess I'd say that CU revealed a series of IPs, maybe, judging from the history. But it's been a long time and I guess I don't mind unprotecting just to see how it goes. Thanks,
Drmies (
talk) 13:55, 16 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection. There were two disruptive editors but they have both been blocked.
MelanieN (
talk) 22:40, 15 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Request temporary semi-protection due to vandalism from multiple sources.
Right cite (
talk) 10:52, 16 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk) 13:37, 16 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Ongoing vandalism and attempts to create entry for non-notable topic per talk page. --
Another Believer(
Talk) 13:30, 16 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamieTalk 14:00, 16 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent IP
vandalism – Requesting protection for a month, due to the event occurring on November 7.
Originalchampion (
talk) 01:22, 15 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection.
MelanieN (
talk) 21:46, 15 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Extended period of semi-protection: Page has frequently been spammed by IP editors with long lists of alleged "stars" of the film, none of whom are actually in the film, as well as reversions to prior versions and other mischief. Has been semi-protected several times in the past year, all for short periods, following which the vandalism recurs. Requesting a 3-6 month semi-protection.
Risker (
talk) 05:59, 16 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Although we had a little spike of disruption yesterday, we should be fine with pending-changes protection.
Lectonar (
talk) 09:11, 16 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Violation from IP.
DelwarHossain (
talk) 17:11, 15 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 18:16, 15 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Declined It was protected for three hours which has expired. It looks like the problem is over for now.
Johnuniq (
talk) 03:40, 16 October 2020 (UTC)reply
request for the page to be semi protected for a week to prevent destructive editing from IP.
Al Riaz Uddin (
talk) 17:24, 15 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 18:16, 15 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Declined Duplicate. It was protected for three hours which has expired. It looks like the problem is over for now.
Johnuniq (
talk) 03:41, 16 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – Page is being reverted to a previous state with an exhaustive list of vehicles in game. Consensus as per
WP:GAMECRUFT #7 is to leave this out. Two IP editors have undone the changes and I don't really want to deal with it. I think an appropriate length for protection would be 1-2 months. If not semi then temporary pending may be more appropriate. HarryKernow(talk) 00:34, 16 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Declined@
HarryKernow: I'm sympathetic regarding the problem, but we have to play by the rules. Please briefly explain the problem on the article talk page and link to the section in the edit summary of the next revert. The explanation should include the GAMECRUFT link and briefly explain what it means. Then post again if no discussion but issue continues. If necessary, ping me.
Johnuniq (
talk) 03:46, 16 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: Persistent
sockpuppetry – Persistent targetting by socks of
User:Hoggardhigh, including IPs, largely to impose style-only change prefs, per sockmaster's activities.
Mutt Lunker (
talk) 16:03, 15 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Johnuniq (
talk) 03:38, 16 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Consistently vandalized by anonymous users that are changing the nationality from Bulgarian to Macedonian.
StoyanStoyanov80 (
talk) 01:43, 16 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Indefinite semi-protection: This page is one of the major targets for anti-Persian sentiment vandalizing and persistently keeps facing such attacks by changing the titles to hateful and disturbing sentiments beside changes or removals of texts' parts without any source or justification by unregistered/new users.These are some examples of such vandalisms from the past month:
Example Vandalism 1Example Vandalism 2Example Vandalism 3Example Vandalism 4
In hope of putting a stop to most of such disruptions I request Indefinite semi-protection for the page. Regards
Donovan.Se (
talk) 14:06, 15 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Mifter (
talk) 23:24, 15 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Vandalizing the article with the addition of singles.
Rangel Carregosa (
talk) 14:50, 15 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Mifter (
talk) 23:32, 15 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Large-scale vandalism of this article by non-autoconfirmed users, possibly socks or co-ordinated meatpuppets. JavaHurricane 16:08, 15 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring.
Largoplazo (
talk) 17:16, 15 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of
dispute resolution. If the editor continues to edit war without engaging in discussion, I'd suggest
WP:AN/EW.
GorillaWarfare(talk) 23:28, 15 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary Semi-protection: I know some other IPs are trying to add stuff. But when they do, the table gets messed up.
172.250.44.165 (
talk) 17:48, 15 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Not done This isn't vandalism, and appears to be an issue with a single IP user. I would recommend dispute resolution, not RFPP.
GorillaWarfare(talk) 23:25, 15 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Persistent vandalism by sockfarm.
Lard Almighty (
talk) 12:15, 15 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Declined. The previous sock attack was in January. Then nothing until October, and that one has now been blocked. If another sock strikes, request again, but at this point there is not enough disruption to justify protecting.
MelanieN (
talk) 22:53, 15 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Seeing repetitive vandalism on both this article as well as the article for Islamabad (the city proper). The article for Islamabad is already subject to semi-protection due to vandalism of the same nature that is occurring on this article, which is not a surprise given their intertwined status. Templates as well as data descriptions are being changed from Pakistan-oriented (whether it's the language template, or the data description) to Indian. I have reverted some of the vandalism but have yet to completely look through this article and clean it up.
Zeex.rice (
talk) 12:15, 15 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
MelanieN (
talk) 22:58, 15 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – Slow-moving edit war between new editors, with one side trying to whitewash the biography and the other verging on BLP violations. Requesting semi-protection so that discussion can move to the talk page.
Conifer (
talk) 15:23, 15 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: Petition to increase protection level. Reviewing pending changes from non-autoconfirmed users makes no sense as the page is target for persistent IP vandal. There's nothing to review, only revert, each and every time.
BlameRuiner (
talk) 15:29, 15 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – IPs seem incapable of contributing usefully on this page, as the history of the past months shows.
GPinkerton (
talk) 18:00, 15 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Starting with a fairly conservative duration, but if the issue resumes after expiry I would be willing to extend.
GorillaWarfare(talk) 23:24, 15 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. People keep adding Mike Brosseau as the father of Aroldis Chapman - obvious vandalism considering Mike Brosseau just hit a home run off of him to win the
2020 ALDS.
Ghinga7 (
talk) 18:46, 15 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – We've now ended week 2 of blocks of text about Kolkata being added to and removed from the article, despite the discussion occurring on the talk page.
Largoplazo (
talk) 12:17, 15 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Fully protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Sigh. This always happens when different regions try to claim the dish as theirs. I don't see any actual discussion at the talk page, just one person has posted there.
MelanieN (
talk) 23:14, 15 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Automated comment:@
ReconditeRodent: This request cannot be parsed. Please ensure it follows formatting consistent with the current or previous methods of submission.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 19:32, 15 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – IP hopper continually adding BLP-violating material.
Neiltonks (
talk) 21:39, 15 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 22:49, 15 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary Extended confirmed protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – persistent disruption in the page by auto-confirmed user, repeatedly doing similar edit, like violation of WP:NFCC#10c. Several policies and guidelines has been violated, it was expected with semi protection that the article is safe but those ip users now have accounts and continuing the same.
Drat8sub (
talk) 14:56, 17 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of
dispute resolution.
Mifter (
talk) 17:18, 17 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Made some controversial tackles in a game earlier today and is likely to get some stick as a result. One case of vandalism has already been reverted.
REDMAN 2019 (
talk) 17:07, 17 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Mifter (
talk) 17:26, 17 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing by IP hopper- Article seems to have been temporarily protected previously due to similar issues.
JohnmgKing (
talk) 10:38, 17 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Currently target by an IP-Hopping mass-reverter. Revision History of the last 50 edits (~ 7Hours) consists entirely of reverts.
Victor Schmidt (
talk) 14:38, 17 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last
8 days.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 14:46, 17 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 15:01, 17 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Already protected by administrator LuK3.
Mifter (
talk) 17:08, 17 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Indefinite semi-protection, perhaps higherExtended confirmed protection. Persistent disruptions and edit warring on a highly contentious topic. Very surprised to see this was not already protected. If this article was ever temporarily protected, then clearly indefinite protection is needed. I would also recommend an admin look at articles related to this topic at their discretion, and make summary judgements protect other articles.
Onetwothreeip (
talk) 01:22, 17 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 01:27, 17 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Declined@
Onetwothreeip: That article is indefinitely semi protected (since February). Click "Page information" in the left sidebar at the article to see the current settings.
Johnuniq (
talk) 02:35, 17 October 2020 (UTC)reply
@
Johnuniq: Then I ask for extended confirmed protection given the persistent issues have not been abated by semi-protection.
Onetwothreeip (
talk) 02:39, 17 October 2020 (UTC)reply
@
Onetwothreeip: An uninvolved admin can apply protection or sanction users based on
WP:ARBR&I. I would protect if there were clear disruption but it's just drip-drip at the moment and I am too
WP:INVOLVED in the topic to take action under these circumstances.
Johnuniq (
talk) 02:45, 17 October 2020 (UTC)reply
No worries. I ask
Mifter the same request, as the other admin currently active on this page.
Onetwothreeip (
talk) 02:53, 17 October 2020 (UTC)reply
For me, i suggested to impose 1RR for that article.
110.137.170.83 (
talk) 04:29, 17 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Sudden target for mass PoV edits - 2 IPs and an account blocked so far today -
Arjayay (
talk) 12:23, 17 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Woody (
talk) 13:16, 17 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Extended-confirmed protection Currently at pending-changes; heavy racist vandalism from IP hopper.
PohranicniStraze (
talk) 07:37, 17 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – Request short term IP block due to IP edit warring.
Wolbo (
talk) 10:31, 17 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Cwmhiraeth (
talk) 11:34, 17 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Almost all of the last 50 edits or so have been unconstructive or their reversions. JavaHurricane 11:28, 17 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk) 11:32, 17 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Johnuniq (
talk) 09:47, 17 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of
unsourced or poorly sourced content – Unsourced additions by IPs continued after the previous protection expired.
Ab207 (
talk) 07:08, 17 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Johnuniq (
talk) 09:48, 17 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. This looks like one new editor putting the same change in repeatedly. I would try discussing the change with them on their talk page, if they don't engage and persist then we have narrower remedy's (such as a block) than protecting the whole page.
Mifter (
talk) 02:07, 17 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Declined@
ZimZalaBim: A quick look suggests it's not
vandalism. However, I agree it is highly disruptive and left a final warning at
188.49.143.253 (
talk·contribs) talk. Please post an explanation at the article talk and a link to that discussion on the IP's talk. The explanation should briefly say why the edit is undesirable. After that, ping me if problems persist.
Johnuniq (
talk) 02:32, 17 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: Vandalism and disruptive editing. Page just came off protection for the same but vandalism continues.
TomCat4680 (
talk) 22:28, 16 October 2020 (UTC)reply
I'm not seeing that. Since the protection was lifted on October 13, the majority of edits have been yours, with a few from others that would not be affected by semi-protection. There are less than half a dozen (I count 4) IP edits that were reverted.
— Maile (
talk) 23:54, 16 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Declined I agree that any disruption is insufficient for protection at this stage.
Johnuniq (
talk) 00:15, 17 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – IP Vandals changing the dates up of the music section.
SP013 (
talk) 23:48, 16 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Declined@
SP013: There is only one IP edit in the last week and there is nothing on talk.
Johnuniq (
talk) 00:20, 17 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Recurring vandalism over the past week from various IPs, who try to insert sexual jokes into the infobox.
AlexandraIDV 02:48, 17 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Declined@
Mvcg66b3r: Sorry but it's hard to see why the edits are
vandalism. There is nothing on the talk page explaining why the IP's edit is undesirable. Please try to engage the IP in discussion on article talk. If there a couple of failed attempts, consider requesting protection again.
Johnuniq (
talk) 00:06, 17 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection, ongoing DE from IPs regarding a controversial game leading to ongoing edit warring of a W-L record.
UW Dawgs (
talk) 01:26, 17 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Johnuniq (
talk) 02:36, 17 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism... I think. Honestly I can't tell what's happening with recent edits to this article; there's been a huge amount of back-and-forth, often with huge formatting errors. Would someone mind taking a look and protect if necessary? Thank you.
Jessicapierce (
talk) 00:23, 17 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Johnuniq (
talk) 02:19, 17 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary pending changes: Persistent
disruptive editing – Varying new IPs/SPAs regularly changing the infobox name against existing consensus from multiple discussions over the last few months (in the last two weeks alone: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5). — MarkH21talk 00:25, 17 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Johnuniq (
talk) 02:21, 17 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – IP vandalism.
Natureium (
talk) 01:47, 17 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 02:13, 17 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Already protected by administrator LuK3.
Mifter (
talk) 02:13, 17 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Loser LTA is harassing me again at my talk page. Please protect it.
4thfile4thrank (
talk) 02:09, 17 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Mifter (
talk) 02:18, 17 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism - page history shows mostly vandalism and reverts. Known for being the longest English word.
AltoStevTalk 22:39, 16 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Johnuniq (
talk) 00:17, 17 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Vandalism by IP sock.
Captain Calm (
talk) 23:16, 16 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 23:57, 16 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Protected by another admin.
Johnuniq (
talk) 00:17, 17 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Question:Atlantic306, this edit warring that happens in the article only involves all-IP, so semi-protection or pending changes would be guaranteed. Why you request ECP even edit warring was all-IPs.
180.244.144.193 (
talk) 00:18, 17 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Because it is not all ips, there are also sockpuppet issues, imv
Atlantic306 (
talk) 00:20, 17 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. @
Atlantic306: I protected it before seeing your note on sockpuppet issues. Please post again or ping me with more information if needed.
Johnuniq (
talk) 00:23, 17 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Well there are two suspected sockpuppets edit warring also using ip hopping accounts. Will open an SPI before the three days are up, imv
Atlantic306 (
talk) 00:26, 17 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Non-admin commentTbhotch, as far as I see the article, the IP sock was already blocked minutes ago.
180.244.144.193 (
talk) 00:15, 17 October 2020 (UTC)reply
TFAs are currently being a target for this IP proxy user. 00:19, 17 October 2020 (UTC)
Already protected. For the bot.
(CC)Tbhotch™ 00:19, 17 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – The same material has been added to and removed from the article all day long.
Largoplazo (
talk) 22:12, 16 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Fully protectedindefinitely. I made it indef in the hope that the indefinite semi-protection will be restored when consensus occurs.
Johnuniq (
talk) 00:08, 17 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Persistent vandalism, even after protection expired.
a gd fan (
talk) 19:38, 16 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk) 22:26, 16 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism.
2.
O.
Boxing 05:50, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
Vandalism has stopped. Now there's repeated unsourced additions by multiple IPs. –
2.
O.
Boxing 07:29, 18 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection.
Woody (
talk) 10:34, 18 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 15:22, 18 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary Semi-protection: Repeated vandalism by various IP editors inserting "Disclaimers".
[25][26][27]192.76.8.82 (
talk) 15:02, 18 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 15:37, 18 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last
8 days.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 16:37, 18 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Favonian (
talk) 18:09, 18 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Subject of this BLP is currently facing gamergate-style harassment on Reddit and Facebook that is spilling over into Wikipedia. Request a week or two of semi protection. I have an obvious COI here which is why I haven't done it myself.--v/r -
TP 14:14, 18 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Woody (
talk) 14:22, 18 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – While I rarely ask for permanent protection, there is continued editing by a sock and other ip's (which based on their editing might be socks), of adding uncited material and commentary.
Onel5969TT me 14:20, 18 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Woody (
talk) 14:23, 18 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Create protection: Repeatedly recreated – The article creator also on their user page at OMGShay 92 have posted things like they've their own rules, like no one else should edit any article written by them, I had just declined the AfC draft because of sources, the creator reverted my AfC decline and moved the article to mainspace and also sent me an email saying that "Didn't you read my rules". Definitely not here for building the encyclopedia. Anyways, this article should be salted and unprotected only when any AfC volunteer asks for protection. Thanks a lot. ─
The Aafī (talk) 15:38, 18 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Extended confirmed protection. Persistent disruptions and edit warring on a highly contentious topic. I would also recommend an admin look at articles related to this topic at their discretion, and make summary judgements to protect other articles.
Onetwothreeip (
talk) 21:33, 17 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Non-admin commentOnetwothreeip: Doesn't it need to impose 1RR for the article which i see it is highly controversial page? I Rather see there is more likely a content dispute.
110.137.170.83 (
talk) 21:43, 17 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last
8 days.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 21:48, 17 October 2020 (UTC)reply
I had requested semi-protection without realising the article was already semi-protected.
Onetwothreeip (
talk) 22:12, 17 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. I don't see any current need for EC protection.
MelanieN (
talk) 22:21, 17 October 2020 (UTC)reply
I was pinged to the last request and was coming to say that I don't believe that ECP is needed. In the last month it would have prevented only 2 edits, both were good faith, one was a good faith addition of a citation needed tag and the other was a little more of an issue but the editor themselves needs to be dealt with not the article. Callanecc (
talk •
contribs •
logs) 01:51, 18 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – This subject is currently running for office in Ohio as has been subject to large NPOV edits both in her favour
ex1,
ex2 and and against
ex3 - which also included potentially libellous unsourced comments about her taxes. Personally, I'd suggest that this page be protected until the election.
Paul ❬
talk❭ 13:27, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
777]] (
talk) 13:09, 18 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Woody (
talk) 14:20, 18 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Continuous vandalism/disruptive editing by IPs, unexplained removal/modification of sourced content. Going on for quite some time, similar PPs in the past but doesn't seem to abate. Needs some long-term semi.
Gotitbro (
talk) 01:03, 18 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. There isn't a high rate of vandalism but it is persistent so I have gone with PC.
Woody (
talk) 10:33, 18 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – This page has a long history of drive by IP edits to change the entire meaning of the article against long standing talk page consensus. Previous protection expired and the DE by IPs has resumed. //
Timothy :: talk 08:18, 18 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Unprotection: Temporary unprotection to add a category redirect to
Category:Wikipedians. May need to be protected again.
JsfasdF252 (
talk) 04:02, 16 October 2020 (UTC)reply
@
JsfasdF252: Is there a discussion somewhere concluding that the page needs to be edited?
Johnuniq (
talk) 09:43, 17 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Probably not, but since the page has been salted for over a decade, I think it's time to put an end to the protection.
JsfasdF252 (
talk) 17:17, 17 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Done I went ahead and created the category redirect without lifting the protection. bibliomaniac15 05:40, 18 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Extended Semi-protection or at least Pending Changes. Persistent vandalism from a series of Finnish IP addresses has resumed following expiry of previous protection templates.
Muzilon (
talk) 22:04, 17 October 2020 (UTC)reply
User(s)
blocked. That particular Finnish range will not be editing that particular article for quite awhile. OhNoitsJamieTalk 23:35, 17 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – IP addresses keep changing the writers of the series in the infobox.
Telenovelafan215 (
talk) 02:43, 18 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. bibliomaniac15 05:34, 18 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – New logo and some new changes announced by the club today, thus leading to disruptive editing. So, requesting for protection upgrade for a small period of time. Saha ❯❯❯ Stay safe 12:39, 17 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection. Those changes are why the article is being edited more than normal. The edits don't seem to be disruptive at the moment.
Woody (
talk) 13:19, 17 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 23:48, 17 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 23:48, 17 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – A lot of recent vandalism dating this month (October) by IP Users.
KRtau16 (
talk) 23:26, 17 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Johnuniq (
talk) 01:00, 18 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Protected by another admin.
Johnuniq (
talk) 01:01, 18 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: IP's have again begun vandalism of lede with unsourced allegations following removal of semi-protection about 3 days ago.
Djm-leighpark (
talk) 20:41, 17 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk) 23:29, 17 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Indefinite create protection: permanent red link for the broken redirect example.
JsfasdF252 (
talk) 18:20, 18 October 2020 (UTC)reply
This is for the recent-ish
Wikipedia:Red link example, but AFAICT that's not linked to at all. So, even aside from the fact that this hasn't ever been created, there's nothing linking to it? ~ Amory(
u •
t •
c) 19:15, 18 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Extended Confirmed Protection: this page has persistently been vandalized by users as you can see from the history. When these users get banned they simply create more accounts to continue with the vandalism. This has been ongoing for 3 months now. An extended confirmed protection will solve this problem.
Jjj84206 (
talk) 19:03, 18 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. I can't see many that have been blocked or indeed much that can be defined as vandalism (noting the specific definition of
vandalism vice
good faith edits.
Woody (
talk) 16:56, 19 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing by IP users returned since temporary two-week semi-protection expired yesterday. --
Wikipedical (
talk) 17:21, 19 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. –
Muboshgu (
talk) 19:04, 19 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
sockpuppetry – Repeated addition of copyright infringing sockpuppets by new account after new account. Blocking is NOT an option as they just create a new account again and again and again. Requesting long-term protection to prevent further copyright issues. Ravensfire (
talk) 16:39, 19 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last
8 days.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 16:47, 19 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamieTalk 18:32, 19 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Some sort of running joke about reading books in the staircase or something. I have no idea. Unrelenting vandalism from several IPs. Thanks,
EDG 543 (
message me) 17:30, 19 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamieTalk 17:32, 19 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – IP's are constantly restoring content that was removed on the grounds of
WP:NOTDIR and unsourced promotion, along with the deletion discussion template (result is likely to be Keep).
TheRedDomitor (
talk) 06:52, 19 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Woody (
talk) 16:58, 19 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – Persistent removal/modification of sourced content and addition of unsourced material mostly by IPs and new accounts. Continues unabated and unlikely to subside anytime as can be seen by the history of the page. Asking for some long term PP here.
Gotitbro (
talk) 07:13, 19 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. IP editors keep inserting false political claims in the article
RBBrittain (
talk) 08:04, 19 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Woody (
talk) 17:02, 19 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Comment - Not sure if comments are allowed here, but I concur. A lot of shady IP editing going on over at that article.
Love of Corey (
talk) 09:03, 19 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. And yes, comments are of course welcome.
Lectonar (
talk) 13:37, 19 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Talk page of a
WP:BLP subject to substantial disruptive IP editing for reasons that are probably obvious. There's another venue where the same stuff can be discussed,
talk:Biden-Ukraine conspiracy theory, so this just protects the BLP itself. Please semi protect until after the US election. Guy (
help! -
typo?) 15:56, 19 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 17 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Woody (
talk) 16:39, 19 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Remove Create Protection, so it can serve as a redirect to
WillNE.
Devonian Wombat (
talk) 11:58, 19 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 12:01, 19 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Continuous vandalism and disruptive editing by IPs and new accounts. Needs some mid-term PP as its unlikely to abate.
Gotitbro (
talk) 22:32, 18 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: Several IP addresses starting with "91." (and all but one followed by "247.") have been removing the filled |budget= parameter and the still empty |gross= parameter from the infobox, without any explanation whatsoever:
Automated comment:@
Facu-el Millo: This request cannot be parsed. Please ensure it follows formatting consistent with the current or previous methods of submission.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 05:58, 19 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: Persistent IP
vandalism – seems to be caught in an anti-lockdown/ anti-Scottish independence whirlwind.
Jesswade88 (
talk) 18:38, 18 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Declined - I don't see any recent IP vandalism since the article was last semi-protected.
~Oshwah~(talk)(contribs) 06:08, 19 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Unsourced information repeatedly added to a BLP from multiple IPs.
OcarinaOfTime (
talk) 19:49, 18 October 2020 (UTC)reply
PLEASE ATTEND. Has now degenerated into edit warring.
NedFausa (
talk) 22:30, 18 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 22:55, 18 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Along with BLP violations and general disruptive edits.
S0091 (
talk) 22:28, 18 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. A viral song has exploded in popularity involving this player, at least 20 reverted edits this month. It will only worsen as the song continues to grow in popularity. Thanks,
EDG 543 (
message me) 01:39, 19 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Two new editors and one IP adding fake graduates.
power~enwiki (
π,
ν) 03:39, 19 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: An editor who have created several sock accounts in the past week keeps on adding copy-pasted material from the newspaper's website in this article. The said editor claims that they are connected to the Philippine Daily Inquirer as mentioned from the editor's edit summaries. See
1,
2,
3 for evidences. -
WayKurat (
talk) 05:19, 19 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Indefinite pending changes: Persistent
disruptive editing – The article has been the target of multiple editors (IPs and new editors) changing content without discussing first on the talkpage. We're working on a longer term solution involving templates but until then this would be the best solution. ≫
Lil-Unique1-{
Talk }- 16:06, 18 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. Only one IP editor causing the disruption. I see they haven't editing for about two hours. -- LuK3(Talk) 02:01, 19 October 2020 (UTC)reply
If someone thinks unprotection would be useful, I would not oppose. However, the general sanctions were imposed for a reason and I would like to see some recent clear and useful edit requests on talk before unprotecting.
Johnuniq (
talk) 02:42, 17 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. I also would like see some useful edit requests before considering unprotecting.
Woody (
talk) 10:39, 18 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Thanks for asking, and for the ping. Hi
Natadmim, of course there has been no recent vandalism – the protection does its job. Because of the enormous amount of disruption regarding this topic, including autoconfirmed sockpuppetry, I'd like to uphold the decision as long as possible, that is, unless it is overturned at
WP:AN or the general sanctions are removed entirely. No unprotection from my side. This applies to all my COVID19 protections.
~ ToBeFree (
talk) 15:25, 18 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – The "Loser" vandal is at it again.
Goose(
Talk!) 00:17, 19 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 00:41, 19 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Already protected by administrator Sro23. Semi-protected for two days. -- LuK3(Talk) 01:53, 19 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent
vandalism – Consistent disruptive editing and vandalism, might need extended confirmed protection. --► Sincerely: SolaVirum 12:50, 18 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Solavirum: I Note to you because most users that vandalize the page are IPs and new registered users. I even see that they are users that are only one contributions, and that's for this article.
110.137.170.83 (
talk) 13:02, 18 October 2020 (UTC)reply
That is why I request ECP on the article. It's only IPs and new users. --► Sincerely: SolaVirum 13:05, 18 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection. I'm not seeing enough disruptive edits when compared to good faith edits over the past 48 hours noting that this is a new article about a recent event that is seeing a high rate of edits.
Woody (
talk) 14:06, 18 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – IP editor persists in removing sourced material and adding unsourced material.
Nomoskedasticity (
talk) 18:11, 18 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Support, IP has now changed their IP address so a block won't work.
Doug Wellertalk 18:58, 18 October 2020 (UTC)reply
User(s)
blocked. @
Doug Weller: I've imposed an article-specific block on the range
2603:9001:6b0b:8e00::/64 which, AFAIKT has been responsible for the last several months worth of disruption.
Favonian (
talk) 19:11, 18 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Immediately resume of
vandalism, which stemmed from previous one-month block. livelikemusic(
TALK!) 16:27, 20 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. Same as above, I'm only seeing a few bad edits (though admittedly no good ones) in the week since expiry. Please bring it back if the rate increases.
Woody (
talk) 16:32, 20 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – The article has been disrupted as well as vandalised by several IPs for past few months, few IPs were also blocked. But this has become a regular phenomenon. Please protect the page from further disruption.
Drat8sub (
talk) 11:50, 20 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Woody (
talk) 16:18, 20 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: Content dispute involving IP users.
219.78.190.190 (
talk) 13:03, 20 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. I'm not seeing a big dispute. I see the merging issue is now being discussed rather than reverted which should be the end of it.
Woody (
talk) 16:21, 20 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Persistent vandalism by anonymous editors which also violate multiple Wikipedia MOS, including
MOS:DTAB and
MOS:TABLECAPTION. livelikemusic(
TALK!) 15:16, 20 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. Note that changes outside the MOS are
explicitly not vandalism. We can't reasonably expect new editors to read through the compendium of regulations that is the MOS.
Woody (
talk) 16:24, 20 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Vandalism started after expiry of protection. See
[37] and
[38].
~ Amkgp💬 15:41, 20 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. Erring on the side of caution. I count two bad edits in the 3 days since the expiration. If they keep it up then please bring it back here.
Woody (
talk) 16:28, 20 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: Persistent
Wikipedia:UNREGISTERED − Persistent vandalism by unregistered users and this article is about a living person which is important.
Bryson Johnson (
talk) 15:45, 20 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Woody (
talk) 16:17, 20 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Recent increase in disruptive edits from IP users.
Bowling is life (
talk) 17:03, 20 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 18:45, 20 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing by same user changing info/dates- block evasion/sockpuppetry.
Magitroopa (
talk) 17:32, 20 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Yeah... very high level of block evasion/sockpuppetry. IP now joining in as well immediately after sock (which has been indeffed).
Magitroopa (
talk) 17:47, 20 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 18:45, 20 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of
unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent addition of unsourced info, particularly attempting to rename the game to God of War Ragnarok based on the teaser trailer using such term. -.
Favre1fan93 (
talk) 21:22, 19 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Woody (
talk) 16:03, 20 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last
8 days.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 00:21, 20 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Woody (
talk) 16:04, 20 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Move protection:High visible page. There was no reasons any users to move it except for administrators only.
180.243.208.98 (
talk) 07:49, 20 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 07:55, 20 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: many people edit on this page for vandalism and I think it would be good to have a semi-protection as most vandalism seems to be caused by unregistered or new users.
Firestar9990 (
talk) 13:07, 20 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. While the article history shows vandalism, there has only been two instances of IP vandalism the past month. -- LuK3(Talk) 15:24, 20 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Page prot was recently lifted and
User:Ee2mba and
User:104.57.183.127 are edit warring again. Recommend either blocking 104.57.183.127 (who was the first to edit after the pp) or preventing both users from editing this page for a while.
Vossanovao< 13:24, 19 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Long slow edit wars going on. Let's get these editors to the talk page over reverting each other for a 10th time. Editors coming back from blocks jumping right in again.Moxy🍁 01:14, 20 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. Only two edits in the last five days, only one of which is a revert. This sort of thing is more appropriate for
WP:ANI and dealt with by blocks.
Ritchie333(talk)(cont) 14:36, 20 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing especially on new users replacing commons image w/ unlicensed image after the article's 2-week semi protection lapsed last October 19. —
Emperork (
talk) 05:57, 20 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Woody (
talk) 16:06, 20 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary extended confirmed protection:BLP policy violations – It seems time has not diminished the attention the subject's article has received because of the subject's actions. Can we tripple the previous one-month of protection?.
Walter Görlitz (
talk) 06:40, 20 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: This user who requested protection has been blocked.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 06:54, 20 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. It was previously only protected for 3 days not a month and there hasn't been that much vandalism (relatively speaking) since the last protection. I've gone with a week for now due to the nature of the edits and it being a BLP.
Woody (
talk) 16:09, 20 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: Recent uptick (with regard to conflict development in Nagorno Karabakh) in disruptive edits by new editors/IP addresses.
AntonSamuel (
talk) 11:59, 20 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Woody (
talk) 16:19, 20 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – This page has recently been recieving disruptive edits from unregistered users.
ֆօʍɛɮօɖʏǟռʏɮօɖʏ05 (
talk) 14:48, 20 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Woody (
talk) 16:22, 20 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – Is a vandal target, and has a very long history of protection. (at least
11 times). Is a hated game by Minecraft fans, which they often vandalize Wikipedia.
a gd fan (
talk) 15:32, 20 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Woody (
talk) 16:26, 20 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I was pondering pending changes as the number of edits isn't that much but it is very persistent since the last protection.
Woody (
talk) 14:45, 20 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Please add
WP:WCA to the list of shortcuts that lead to the page on the article, as that shortcut also redirects to the page, among the other ones.
176.222.226.5 (
talk) 14:32, 20 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Some IP users are adding unsourced contents and removing sourced contents .
WhiteFalcon1 (
talk) 11:51, 19 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 10:41, 20 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Unprotection: After over 6 years (!), there is absolutely no valid reason per the protection policy to maintain full protection (again, !) on this redirect. The deletion discussion that originally led to the protection was rendered moot by the "new" (2016) article at
Calendar (Windows). (Note: the protecting administrator claims to be inactive.).
Modernponderer (
talk) 18:18, 19 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Unprotected I've added it to my watchlist. Any untoward edits and it will be protected again. The protecting admin is inactive as they haven't edited for a month, no "claims" about it.
Woody (
talk) 14:20, 20 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: IP vandalism; contentious current election.
Kingsif (
talk) 10:24, 19 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection. —
Wug·a·po·des 02:02, 20 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism.
NedFausa (
talk) 19:08, 19 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 20:50, 19 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Already protected by administrator Materialscientist. Semi-protected for two days. -- LuK3(Talk) 13:08, 20 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary extended-confirmed protection: Several cases of
WP:BATTLEGROUND content removal / whitewashing today in spite of semi-protection. Recommend extended-confirmed for a month or so. Not implementing protection myself per INVOLVED.
ST47 (
talk) 03:50, 20 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Already protected by administrator L235. -- LuK3(Talk) 13:05, 20 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. One user keeps adding content in violation of NPOV ("best movie ever"). Temporary only; my intention is to enforce a "cooldown". — MrConorAE(
👤U |
💬T |
📝C) 23:17, 19 October 2020 (UTC)reply
User(s)
blocked. Rangeblocked 2601:408:c301:3ea0:8000::/65 for 2 weeks. Ping me if they resume after. OhNoitsJamieTalk 02:35, 20 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – The article has also been repeatedly vandalized for a while now.
Scorpions13256 (
talk) 20:18, 19 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Mifter (
talk) 02:21, 20 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Persistent vandalism by several IP users, mostly because they hate his character in Cobra Kai.
Areaseven (
talk) 11:51, 19 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. No vandalism for the last four days.
Cwmhiraeth (
talk) 20:07, 19 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – corporate public relations white washing sourced contents. The same IP who has been adding promotional contents for months.
Graywalls (
talk) 20:52, 19 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection Currently has pending-changes. Under attack from, apparently, the same IP-shifting vandal who previously vandalized
Quarantine among other pages. No point to keep reverting pending changes, just protect it.
PohranicniStraze (
talk) 23:43, 19 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- LuK3(Talk) 00:19, 20 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Extended confirmed protected: Disruptive editing + removal of sourced contents.
Beshogur (
talk) 23:40, 20 October 2020 (UTC)reply
QuestionBeshogur Did you see any distruptive editing that happens in these articles? I don't see any distruptive editing in
2020 Ganja ballistic missile attacks. In fact many edits are good faith. I only see distruptive editing in plenty articles that your requesting protection.
180.243.208.98 (
talk) 23:48, 20 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Removed, it's just one edit.
Beshogur (
talk) 23:56, 20 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. There is also likely to be collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection. You also seem to have reverted one user across a number of those articles but haven't mentioned this on their talk page or the talk pages of the articles concerned.
Woody (
talk) 14:25, 21 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Ongoing IP vandalism. Protected for 3 days on 16 October; within 12 hours of that expiring, vandalism began again. IPs are apparently unconnected to each other.
BlackcurrantTea (
talk) 19:31, 21 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Edit war going on over the nae of the stadium owner due to recent game loss.
Geoff | Who, me? 19:56, 21 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – Stream of IP editors repeatedly removing a representative review because they disagree with its substance.
Innisfree987 (
talk) 14:39, 21 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Woody (
talk) 14:49, 21 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 15:37, 21 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Pending changes protection High level of IPs adding unsourced content.
D🐶ggy54321(
let's chat!) 17:01, 21 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. The rate of edits are too high for PC.
Woody (
talk) 17:04, 21 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: This article throughout its history has suffered from occasional disruption/pov-pushing by random IPs and new accounts (such as now). Imho it would better off protected for a long time.
HistoryofIran (
talk) 00:03, 21 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Cwmhiraeth (
talk) 08:43, 21 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Full Protection: Continued disruptive editing on article (including content corrections and updates), POV edits, and use of poorly sourced content by users Binksternet and Wikiman2718.— Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Scandevi (
talk •
contribs) 12:32, 21 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Woody (
talk) 14:17, 21 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Full protection: I guess
Materialscientist forgot to protect the Talk page when protecting the article. It is quite vandalized too, due to hot current events. Thanks. — Smuckola(talk) 21:19, 20 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: Continued disruptive editing on article- users continuing to change ordering of episodes despite sources listed.
Magitroopa (
talk) 21:28, 20 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of
unsourced or poorly sourced content – Continued addition by IPs to change the title of the article (through DISPLAYTITLE) and in the lead and infobox to an unconfirmed name for the game.
Favre1fan93 (
talk) 02:24, 21 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last
8 days.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 02:32, 21 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Comment While the latest socks have now just been banned, going by this user or users history, I don't expect it will be long before they are back. Would be good to make it harder for them I think, if they would have to get extended confirmed first. NZFC(talk)(cont) 08:39, 21 October 2020 (UTC)reply
All of their non-recent socks have not yet been autoconfirmed. I don't think extended confirmed is needed yet, but semi protection won't ago amiss. Therefore, Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Leaving the pending changes protection as is, so it will continue after the semi protection.
Dreamy Jazztalk to me | my contributions 10:19, 21 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Recently the maintenance tags on this page have been being repeatedly removed by various IPs. A period of semi-protection may calm this down.
AllyD (
talk) 08:19, 21 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Indefinite pending changes protection: Since the beginning of October (as far as I can trace back, for now), an IP sock/IP hopper from Hanoi, Vietnam has been vandalizing these two pages, and it’s not stopping. They have been warned time after time, yet continue to do it.
D🐶ggy54321(
let's chat!) 23:19, 20 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Cwmhiraeth (
talk) 08:31, 21 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary full protection: Repeated removal of controversial information regarding a phenomenon of ideological conflicts within the punk subculture, involving the topic of neo-naziism; probably due to sudden circulation of
a recent Tumblr post.
The1truesushiboy (
talk) 05:30, 20 October 2020 (UTC)reply
CommentThe1truesushiboy, temporary full protection would be unlikely to be imposed due to fact users that conduct edit warring are all IP users, so maybe it needs a semi-protection or pending changes protection.
180.243.208.98 (
talk) 06:27, 20 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 23:31, 20 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. TFA article, always prone to IP Vandalism.
180.243.208.98 (
talk) 00:02, 21 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 03:03, 21 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Persistent IP vandalism.
Goose(
Talk!) 02:00, 21 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 04:03, 21 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Already protected by administrator Sro23.
Favonian (
talk) 05:37, 21 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Indefinite no protection: I do not think Mario Party is that popular of a game to be frequently vandalized. That's why I am asking for the page to be unlocked. Thanks for reconsidering.
176.222.226.5 (
talk) 18:15, 18 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Note:@
Fox: As the protecting admin, any objection to removing the protection?
Woody (
talk) 16:47, 19 October 2020 (UTC)reply
@
Woody: Wow, 2011! By all means unprotect (I'll just go ahead and do so now). —
🦊 23:23, 19 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Already unprotected by administrator Fox.
Woody (
talk) 14:02, 20 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Automated comment:@
Woody: One or more pages in this request have not been unprotected.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 14:13, 20 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Note: Remains move protected, semi has been removed
Woody (
talk) 14:15, 20 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Note: If the page is move-protected, why doesn't it display the move protection lock on the page?
176.222.226.5 (
talk) 14:35, 20 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Because that is an unnecessary template. See
this discussion about the deprecation of that template.
Woody (
talk) 14:42, 20 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Done – for the bot.
Favonian (
talk) 05:35, 21 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: Many IPs change and delete the correct information in the article and add false writing. This can be verified through the history of the article modifications and the previous correct version of the article before these malicious edits..
Hamadinhoo (
talk) 08:24, 20 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection.
Woody (
talk) 16:13, 20 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: There seems to be some warring back and forth between IP editors and a possible SPA; semi-protection seems to be an appropriate method to deal with it (there may be other articles; these are the only two i've run across at the moment); happy days, LindsayHello 10:37, 20 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Unless I am missing something, one of the users reverting is autoconfirmed. If this is the case, the semi-protection will give them an unfair advantage, and extended confirmed protection can only be applied if the semi-protection have not helped. I am afraid the only possible way out is to look at the users and possibly apply some blocks (in a couple of minutes I was not able to decide whether one side or both sides are at fault).--
Ymblanter (
talk) 11:00, 20 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Pending changes: Persistent
vandalism – Vandalism and repeated unsourced BLP additions by IP editors. Going for PC instead of Semi as I am seeing some constructive IPs editing. NonsensicalSystem(err0r?)(.log) 11:24, 22 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – BLP of a football referee who has made some decisions with which some agree leading to vandalism by numerous IPs. Recently protected with vandalism reoccurring when unprotected.
Egghead06 (
talk) 15:19, 22 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- LuK3(Talk) 16:17, 22 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: Persistent addition of
unsourced or poorly sourced content – After an announcement that the service will end, IPs have been constantly changing the article to imply that it has already gone defunct, which hasn't happened yet and they have yet to announce a specific date for when it will. JDDJS (
talk to me •
see what I've done) 16:03, 22 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: I am getting annoyed by some LTA adding "reports" and the reverts of those triggering 2 echo notifications each time. I appreciate a semi-protection for half a year or so.
Base (
talk) 07:32, 22 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 09:56, 22 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk) 14:32, 22 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Multiple additions of Joe Biden related content (Joe Biden is corrupt etc). Might not meet the level required normally but given the subject I would argue that semi-protection until after the American election has finished might be prudent
AsarteaTrick|Treat 12:41, 22 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Ongoing IP attempts to put time-inappropriate company names in this (and other Sesame Street-related articles.).
Nat Gertler (
talk) 04:52, 22 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Declined IP blocked for three days. @
NatGertler: This IP is also at ANI. The other IP has not been active for three days. Please let me know if problems resume.
Johnuniq (
talk) 06:51, 22 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Vandalized by anon ips that keep changing the nationality of this figure without discussing on talk.
StoyanStoyanov80 (
talk) 12:32, 22 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. --Deepfriedokra(talk) 12:38, 22 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: High level of IPs adding unsourced content.
D🐶ggy54321(
let's chat!) 18:14, 21 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection.
Woody (
talk) 18:52, 21 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection or Extended confirmed protection Frequent IP and non-IP vandalism/disruptive edits by unregistered, new, and even some non-new users.
TheEpicGhosty (
talk) 20:25, 21 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: High level of IPs adding unsourced content.
D🐶ggy54321(
let's chat!) 18:14, 21 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection.
Woody (
talk) 18:52, 21 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – TFA today, which will gives advantage by anon IP to vandalize the article.
180.243.208.98 (
talk) 00:09, 22 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Seems like a slow-motion edit war where a variety of IP addresses and single-purpose accounts like
User:Royjameson248 keep adding back a large amount of material with only primary sources, and more senior editors keep removing it as promotional, excessive detail, and poorly sourced. As an admin I would add this myself, but I've been involved with the repeated cleanup. --
Beland (
talk) 00:23, 22 October 2020 (UTC)reply
User(s)
blocked. This is all coming from the same IP range (
2600:8803:FF01:100:0:0:0:0/64) so I've blocked the range for two weeks. If this recurs, recommend asking for the range to be blocked for a longer duration rather than asking for page protection.
GorillaWarfare(talk) 02:22, 22 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Upsurge in vandal edits due to the organization's recent signing of a popular streamer. Should subside in a week or two with protection.
CentreLeftRight✉ 22:40, 21 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 01:39, 22 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: Repeated addition of
BLP-violating material about ongoing legal proceedings that will not conclude until at least December.
XOR'easter (
talk) 01:47, 22 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – The same IP makes these small but annoying edits to my user subpage every few months despite my warnings... I can understand how it might not happen often enough to warrant protection/any kind of intervention, but would like to put a stop to it if possible.
4TheWynne(talk•contribs) 02:11, 22 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: He was arrested by the current government. He was a Deputy Prime Minister back when the current governing party was in power in 2005-2007. The issue is political and we can expect more "funny" add-ons. Cheers!
Nadzik (
talk) 18:39, 21 October 2020 (UTC).
Nadzik (
talk) 18:39, 21 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – 30/500 editors making changes to the established lead language, even though there is ongoing talk page discussion. This bio is a hot button issue for the 2020 election, on November 3, and I am requesting an UNINVOLVED admin fully protect the page for two weeks. –
Muboshgu (
talk) 20:51, 21 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – Does anyone else think this talk page needs semi protection for a few weeks? We just have a lot of repetitive arguments being posted, and now, some edit warring over applications of
WP:NOTFORUM.
ST47 (
talk) 22:59, 21 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Chetsford (
talk) 23:58, 21 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Extended user protection: IP vandalism. It appears to be the same person on the same articles, but with different IPs.
CYAce01 (
talk) 12:07, 23 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Declined, insufficient disruption to the listed articles, not clear that the edits are sufficiently disruptive to justify a block at this time given that there don't appear to have been any attempts to engage with the IP editor beyond edit summaries (and the IP thus far appears to have avoided actually warring back for their preferred version on any one article). Try engaging with the IP, then proceed to either AN3 or ANI if disruption persists and does not focus on a single article. signed, Rosguilltalk 18:48, 23 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – As an Engene myself, I don’t appreciate how other possible Engenes are just vandalising this article as if it’s some promotion and soapbox to either confess their romance for Enhypen, swaying the tone of the article to seem more biased, or to go off on this, like?!?. Beetricks 17:38, 23 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. signed, Rosguilltalk 19:01, 23 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary full protection: Edit warring, lack of constructive editing and frequent copyvio by editors.
ArvindPalaskar (
talk) 17:50, 23 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of
dispute resolution. 2 accounts blocked for sockpuppeting. signed, Rosguilltalk 19:05, 23 October 2020 (UTC)reply
ONLY Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing on and off as the "big" event comes closer.
Kent Bargo (
talk) 19:25, 23 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Automated comment:@
Rosguill: One or more pages in this request have not been protected.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 19:52, 23 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Not sure how to make the bot happy for a request with mixed responses, help anyone? signed, Rosguilltalk 19:53, 23 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing. This article has been disrupted by ethno-nationalistic edits since day one, imo it should be protected for a long time.
HistoryofIran (
talk) 20:14, 23 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Favonian (
talk) 20:18, 23 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – Anon un-discussed edit with different IP address.
Aleenf1 15:13, 23 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Also keep unsourced addition to the list. --
Aleenf1 15:16, 23 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. signed, Rosguilltalk 18:51, 23 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Well done, you're giving reason to a person who doesn't even check the information he inserts on Wikipedia. He didn't even know many broadcasters had changed and insulted me when I underlined his incompetence as well. Nothing new on Wikipedia: incompetent and arrogant people getting what they want. I sourced my edits, he reverted everything and then inserted again the same information with the same sources! Furthemore, my IP addressn changed because I'm on the road at the moment, if you really care. But I guess the important is the
baby got the candies now. --
217.59.200.127 (
talk) 19:32, 23 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism and disruptive editing in last days by IP-hopping editors.
Mr.User200 (
talk) 16:41, 23 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. as some IPs appear to be making constructive edits. signed, Rosguilltalk 18:54, 23 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Automated comment:@
Rosguill: One or more pages in this request have not been protected.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 19:07, 23 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – Disruptive edits by dynamic IPs and new users, adding unsourced content and removing sourced content. Also breaking citations and format styles.
Fylindfotberserk (
talk) 18:27, 23 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last
8 days.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 18:36, 23 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., blocked 2 editors (1 autoconfirmed, 1 EC-confirmed) 24 hours for 3RR violations. signed, Rosguilltalk 19:24, 23 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Due recent controversy, unregistered users keep editing the page with unreliable information from unreliable news sources.
Paper9oll | Talk:(
Paper9oll) 16:50, 23 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. signed, Rosguilltalk 18:57, 23 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – IP continuing edit war that was resolved days ago. ~Destroyeraa🌀 18:01, 23 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Favonian (
talk) 18:52, 23 October 2020 (UTC)reply
I suggest temp. semi, and bump it up to ECP if needed. Rapid re-adding non-encyclopaedic content in the lead section and edit-warring over fatalities in the infobox.
Pelagic (
messages ) – (22:44 Fri 23, AEST) 12:44, 23 October 2020 (UTC) [edit: getting some good, sourced additions by new users outside the top section, hope blocking the IPs is enough to defuse this.]
Pelagic (
messages ) – (22:50 Fri 23, AEST) 12:50, 23 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism with incorrect information and changes in multiple times. Had a personal conversation with the person.
Gihan Jayaweera (
talk) 14:07, 23 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. There's been one unconstructive editor since last protection; that IP has now been warned. OhNoitsJamieTalk 15:10, 23 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Unregistered user keep vandalising the page with words like "goat" "goat bully", "jimin bully goat", "goat jimin meehehe" and random "hahaha".
Paper9oll | Talk:(
Paper9oll) 15:58, 23 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamieTalk 16:12, 23 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary Semi-protection: Multiple recent edits that do not conform to Wikipedia's guidelines. Abuse is likely to continue for the near term future. Article should have protection raised for a reasonably short period of time to prevent continued abusive edits from a variety of nonmembers.
2601:742:8000:9AA0:B0C2:C15B:6D32:585C (
talk) 17:34, 23 October 2020 (UTC) 2601:742:8000:9aa0:7ccd:7fcf:c430:dareply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 17:36, 23 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Already protected by administrator ST47.
Favonian (
talk) 17:41, 23 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – Recent disruption by some IP hopper. 48-72 hours semi-protection would be helpful.
Wario-Man (
talk) 13:31, 22 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Comment Looks like the IP has been blocked; I see a few previous IPs have been reverted, but it's not clear that the edits are pushing the same POV. OhNoitsJamieTalk 13:46, 22 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Lectonar (
talk) 12:48, 23 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Lot of people are coming and removing the sourced content and writing their own biased views.
MRRaja001 (
talk) 04:38, 23 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Extended user protection: Both cities are occupied by a foreign power. Here:
List of military occupations, is a list about occupations.
Beshogur (
talk) 11:47, 22 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 11:56, 22 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Declined We do not protect pages against just one user. In this case, the user is autoconfirmed, which makes things even more complicated. I have goven them a Ds alert, however, I do not see them being warned. Starting with warnings will be the correct avenue here.--
Ymblanter (
talk) 10:49, 23 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Indefinite extended confirmed protection:Arbitration enforcement – Yishai Fleisher, a relatively new article, is part of the Arab-Israeli conflict.
RedPanda25 01:57, 23 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Yep. The indefinite protection is not forever (it can be removed etc.), but the BLP violations / disruptive editing which has consistently been happening for years suggested to me indef semi-protection is needed. Pending changes didn't seem useful, as from what I can see all IP edits have been disruptive for ages.
Dreamy Jazztalk to me | my contributions 15:17, 23 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Unprotection: Page was indefinitely semi-protected almost ten years ago with no prior protection history. Protecting admin is more or less inactive (hasn't edited since July, last 50 edits go back to 2017).
Conifer (
talk) 17:48, 22 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring.
Elizium23 (
talk) 16:52, 22 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. Please discuss the categories issue on the article talk page.
Cwmhiraeth (
talk) 09:09, 23 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Persistent vandalism by several IP users.
Areaseven (
talk) 08:16, 23 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 09:34, 23 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary move protection: Page title dispute/move warring.
(CC)Tbhotch™ 16:44, 22 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 17:13, 22 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Content dumps from IP addresses and changing the manual of style.
SP013 (
talk) 17:41, 22 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Cwmhiraeth (
talk) 09:21, 23 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Simple vandalism (mostly name-calling related to opposition of O'Toole's actions) Username6892(
Peer Review) 19:16, 22 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Mifter (
talk) 04:37, 23 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Likely due to the film’s controversial subject matter (and depiction of certain groups), IPs are trying to make reception appear more negative than it actually is.
TropicAces (
talk) 19:59, 22 October 2020 (UTC)tropicAcesreply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Mifter (
talk) 04:36, 23 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – I believe this page should be EC protected due to the amount of vandalism it will most likely receive.
Lettlerhello •
contribs 02:41, 23 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – Edit warring over the Jami-Lee Ross interview, being edited with non neutral view. Occurring due to recent election in New Zealand where Jami-Lee Ross and the Advance New Zealand party performed poorly.
Vanadium101 (
talk) 10:57, 22 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 19:13, 22 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Already protected by administrator Gadfium. Semi-protected for 1 day. -- LuK3(Talk) 23:52, 22 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: On the grounds of multiple persistent IP vandals constantly changing time-appropriate names of companies to time-inappropriate names, etc. And the same goes for every other page they vandalized. Blocking the IPs is not enough. They just hop from one IP to the next to evade their blocks.
DawgDeputy (
talk) 20:38, 22 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Johnuniq (
talk) 00:12, 23 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last
8 days.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 17:13, 22 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 19:13, 22 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Already protected by administrator Kinu.
Favonian (
talk) 20:01, 22 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Persistent trolling. Already under pending changes, but it needs far stronger protection.
Crboyer (
talk) 22:44, 22 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Already protected by administrator Mz7. Semi-protected for 1 month. -- LuK3(Talk) 23:41, 22 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism, Repeated false editing(False History) by the
User:Srnec, Avoid removal of content.
EldhoseTalk 16:48, 24 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Eldhorajan92 is lying. There has been one (1) IP edit in the history of the page. The so-called "false history" is a statement sourced to RS, which Eldhorajan92 removed but which he has now restored with a different RS because he is incompetent.
Srnec (
talk) 16:55, 24 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last
8 days.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 16:59, 24 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. Semi-protection would not accomplish anything in any case, because the two disputing editors are both auto-confirmed. @
Srnec and
Eldhorajan92: The two of you need to stop insulting each other, and start to discuss/work out your differences on the article talk page.
MelanieN (
talk) 18:21, 24 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Currently target by a revert vandal, over 50 edits on history within 12 minutes.
Victor Schmidt (
talk) 19:44, 24 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 20:29, 24 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Indefinite pending changes: Persistent
vandalism – It is a target of Balkan nationalists using anon ips to change the nationality of this historical figure without adding references or discussing at talk.
StoyanStoyanov80 (
talk) 13:10, 24 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
MelanieN (
talk) 16:44, 24 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: Persistent removal of same content over the past two year from registered users. Strengthed with sources. -
Usefamin (
talk) 13:23, 24 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
MelanieN (
talk) 16:45, 24 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – Dynamic IPs adding destination maps for which there is no consensus. It is one of the airports vandalized by the IPs. A few others got projected today as part of another request
here.
Fylindfotberserk (
talk) 16:24, 24 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk) 18:13, 24 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Got semi-protected twice, each time the semi protection ended neo nazi IPs returned to restore a white washed version of the article.--
Catlemur (
talk) 16:39, 24 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk) 18:08, 24 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Repeated false editing by the same person.
アレックシュン (
talk) 11:36, 24 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. Only two problematic edits in the past week. It looks like PC protection is working. -- LuK3(Talk) 12:25, 24 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Problem editing is long-term, but not frequent enough to justify semi-protection. Let's see what PC can do.
MelanieN (
talk) 16:52, 24 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Subject popped into the political spotlight this week because of a tweet during the presidential debate and the page has seen consistent vandalism since. ‑‑ElHef (
Meep?) 14:58, 24 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 16:13, 24 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Already protected by administrator LuK3.
Favonian (
talk) 16:14, 24 October 2020 (UTC)reply
ECP under GS/Crypto: Newly-created, and already seeing a flood of drive-by enthusiasts and holders of the cryptocurrency, recruited off-wiki by Cardano's creator. This sort of circumstance is why
WP:GS/Crypto allows limited or indefinite ECP by any uninvolved admin. I'd indef-ECP itself except I've been editing -
David Gerard (
talk) 09:49, 24 October 2020 (UTC)reply
QuestionDavid Gerard, Should it be moved protected by admin only as well? WP:GS/Crypto doesn't explicitly mention ECP for all crypto-related article. Because this, the pages
cannot be protected preemptively.
36.65.38.17 (
talk) 10:26, 24 October 2020 (UTC)reply
GS/Crypto explicitly says: any uninvolved administrator may impose on any page or set of pages relating to the area of conflict page protection, revert restrictions, prohibitions on the addition or removal of certain content (except when consensus for the edit exists), or any other reasonable measure that the enforcing administrator believes is necessary and proportionate for the smooth running of the project. This was ratified unanimously -
David Gerard (
talk) 10:55, 24 October 2020 (UTC)reply
But you must note, because
Bitcoin is already move protected, this article should be move protected by admin only as well.
36.65.38.17 (
talk) 12:01, 24 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected, it looks like for the time being semi-protection is sufficient. I will be happy to apply extended-confirmed protection if needed.--
Ymblanter (
talk) 14:39, 24 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – IP vandalism/disruptive edits; a week should suffice.
4TheWynne(talk•contribs) 13:30, 24 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk) 14:36, 24 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism and BLP violations.
Blablubbs(
talk •
contribs) 12:45, 24 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -
David Gerard (
talk) 12:49, 24 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Vandalism as a resut of the
endSARS protest.
Kaizenify (
talk) 09:23, 24 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -
David Gerard (
talk) 09:52, 24 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Due to the unrest as a result of the protest in Nigeria, there have been series of page vandalism for all Nigeria related articles.
Kaizenify (
talk) 09:37, 24 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -
David Gerard (
talk) 09:52, 24 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Unprotection: Not sure why this was protected (by a bot of all things). I'm using some of Wikipedia's templates related to the MBTA for a personal website project of mine, and I'm needing to add or modify some of the template styles for the colors of station Infobox headings on a temporary basis to reflect future changes to the system. Any changes I make to the module will be almost immediately self-reverted once I collect the template styles that I need for my website. See
User_talk:Pi.1415926535#MBTA_station_color_headers for background.
192.196.218.224 (
talk) 01:27, 24 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – User 'Chariot rider' is removing content without proper explanation. I request you to look into this carefully and do some justice. Thank you. Not only that user, but many are editing this article in wrong way.
Fire star on heat (
talk) 07:35, 24 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Declined I've warned the user and you are already aware of rules on edit warring. If it continues report to
WP:ANEW. I've also Semi-protected the page for a week to get people to log into their accounts. Callanecc (
talk •
contribs •
logs) 09:09, 24 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – Repeated addition of destination maps in Airport Articles for which there is
no consensus. This IP range from Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India has been partially blocked. They are doing the same thing in other airport articles of India
[39][40].
Fylindfotberserk (
talk) 07:58, 24 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: Edit warring and disruption. The page was protected not so long ago, seems like it needs it once more.
HistoryofIran (
talk) 00:11, 24 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Johnuniq (
talk) 05:56, 24 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: POV-pushing, IP-hopping editor who reinstates their edits after being reverted (by multiple editors) and refuses to engage in talk page discussion. Also likely
WP:BLOCKEVASION by
Hugo Refachinho (see this edit summary of mine). Blocking is unlikely to be effective due to the IP hopping.
TompaDompa (
talk) 01:02, 24 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Johnuniq (
talk) 05:58, 24 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Question:Aleenf1, the article that have you requested was already protected before you request.
36.65.38.17 (
talk) 05:09, 24 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Protected by another admin.
Johnuniq (
talk) 06:07, 24 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. @
Atlantic306: There is nothing on talk to show the problem and I don't have the expertise to know that the entries are fake. It was previously semi-protected for a month so I replicated that. At any rate, protection has to slowly escalate.
Johnuniq (
talk) 05:50, 24 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Indefinite Semi-protection:Persistent IP vandalism. Terrible Inmate "jokes" made by Block evation IPs.
Mr.User200 (
talk) 02:58, 24 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Johnuniq (
talk) 04:29, 24 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection:BLP policy violations – Immediate return to vandalism and BLP vios after previous 6-month semi expired. Suggest something longer.
AntiCompositeNumber (
talk) 03:36, 24 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Protected by another admin. @
AntiCompositeNumber: Let me know if this resumes and I will protect for longer.
Johnuniq (
talk) 04:30, 24 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – IP continuously adding a non-notable alumni.
Steven (Editor) (
talk) 21:09, 23 October 2020 (UTC)reply
User(s)
blocked. Rangeblocked (disrupting other articles as well). OhNoitsJamieTalk 21:27, 23 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – The vandalism on Drag Race contestant charts is relentless. Please see ongoing discussion at WP:WikiProject RuPaul's Drag Race -- we need help protecting these charts. --
Another Believer(
Talk) 22:02, 23 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Johnuniq (
talk) 04:15, 24 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent levels of vandalism regarding an ongoing joke that YouTuber Kurtis Conner has joined the band Wallows. See
Talk:Wallows for more info and links to tweets, which makes it clear the whole thing is a joke. –
Bangalamania (
talk) 22:31, 23 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Johnuniq (
talk) 04:17, 24 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Page is vandalized by nationalists changing the identity of this historical figure without adding any sources or discussing at the talk page.
StoyanStoyanov80 (
talk) 22:42, 23 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Non-admin commentStoyanStoyanov80, Vandalism that happens in this article and
Hristo Tatarchev is very low, only just one or two IPs. Because of this, two articles need to be likely a pending changes protection instead.
36.65.38.17 (
talk) 23:12, 23 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. @IP: True, but the article recently ended three months of semi-protection which explains the low number of attempts.
Johnuniq (
talk) 04:23, 24 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Page is vandalized by nationalists changing the identity of this historical figure without adding any sources or discussing at the talk page.
StoyanStoyanov80 (
talk) 22:43, 23 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Johnuniq (
talk) 04:23, 24 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Page is vandalized by nationalists changing the identity of this historical figure without adding any sources or discussing at the talk page.
StoyanStoyanov80 (
talk) 22:43, 23 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Johnuniq (
talk) 04:23, 24 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism.
アレックシュン (
talk) 16:05, 23 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection., all bad edits come from one IP and occurred within a short period--
Ymblanter (
talk) 20:02, 23 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: One user continues editing this page with an oddly aggressively worded section about Historical Inaccuracies. Not only does this not warrant an entire section, but the tone of the writing is incredibly biased and confrontational. It is clear the author disdains the approach the film took, but this was not a broad controversy, just one user’s bone to pick, and it does not belong on the film’s Wikipedia page. Multiple users have attempted shortening it in an effort to remove the bias, but this same user continues adding the same massive section over and over. I would advise either protecting the short single paragraph form that was just edited back, or removing the Historical Accuracy section entirely, and then protecting it from future edits.
Mkultra1234 (
talk) 18:07, 23 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of
dispute resolution. signed, Rosguilltalk 19:13, 23 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Indefinite semi-protection:BLP policy violations – Persistent BLP violations suggesting the subject took part in the deaths of his gf and son when subject specifically was not present at the time of either. This is a longstanding issue with both this and the
Death of Rebecca Zahau. Closing admin, please look at recent edits by IP and scrub their additions if you would. Thanks.
Koncorde (
talk) 12:16, 25 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. The page went for four months, until the start of October, with no edits at all. This month it's had a handful of instances of easily revertible, albeit serious, vandalism. I think two days is sufficient to start, however, if that doesn't solve the situation please file a new request and we can extend it for a longer period. As of now, indefinite semi-protection is too extreme.
Chetsford (
talk) 22:04, 25 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring.
Elizium23 (
talk) 05:03, 25 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last
8 days.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 05:17, 25 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: Subject has recently been in the news for less than flattering reasons, attracting high level of vandalism by IPs and SPAs.
Banana Republic (
talk) 14:12, 25 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Favonian (
talk) 17:12, 25 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: BLP Policy Violations. IP's keep placing link to "Hunter Biden sextapes" sourced to the TheDonald.
Acroterion has alreday blocked 4 IP's however the person behind it seems to keep coming back with new IP's
AsarteaTrick|Treat 16:49, 25 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – Persistent unsourced content edition by ips for past 2 to 3 months. However, newly registered users to doing it but I think it can be controllable at this stage through talk pages. But semi protection is needed badly.
Drat8sub (
talk) 03:18, 25 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection:BLP policy violations – I don't follow the football, but I guess Sutton was involved in the grand final match this evening?.
Pelagic (
messages ) – (20:53 Sun 25, AEST) 10:53, 25 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 11:33, 25 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism and likely sock-puppetry too. A common Balkans-related issue. An IP with a poor command of English and no intention to discuss goes against talk page consensus.
Surtsicna (
talk) 22:26, 24 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Before my editing ip committed vandalism, now they want user Surtsicna to exclude me from editing so vandalism remains.
I reported a problem here
[44]93.138.26.51 (
talk) 22:36, 24 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Massive edit war.
RedPanda25 01:57, 25 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Non-admin commentRedPanda25, edit warring that happens in the article only involves all-IP addresses that i suspect there are sockpuppet, so this page would be likely semi-protection instead. IPs that engage in distruptive behaviour needs to be reported to
AIV or
ANI. It is more like vandalism for me.
36.76.229.70 (
talk) 02:04, 25 October 2020 (UTC)reply
36.76.229.70, This isn't just a normal case of vandalism, or a normal edit war. Have you seen how fast the edits were being reverted? Regardless I reported it in both places.
RedPanda25 02:07, 25 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – I have previously asked for an ECP but was only semi-protected instead. Now it has been utterly frustrating to deal every day the same thing, unsourced content addition by newly registered users. Its even more frustrating because all these users are totally unresponsive. I ahve pinged them at article talk page, warned them but everytime a new user comes and disrupt the article. An ECB may be very much helpful. Thank you.
Drat8sub (
talk) 22:18, 24 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Declined. I have given a Final Warning to the two accounts that have done this (twice each). At this time the situation is not serious enough to change from semi-protection to EC protection.
MelanieN (
talk) 22:51, 24 October 2020 (UTC)reply
MelanieN, I have seen, hope they change their editing behaviour. I even found out that they did in other article too related to the league article like
Mohammedan article, the history of which is a hotch potch of unsourced contents edit, I have requested protection for that too, a Semi protection. I think that will be helpful.
Drat8sub (
talk) 03:22, 25 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Declined. The song really did appear in O Brother, Where Are Thou? so I just readded it with a source this time.
MelanieN (
talk) 23:24, 24 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – Persistent addition of copyrighted works. ɴᴋᴏɴ21❯❯❯talk 18:22, 24 October 2020 (UTC)reply
CommentNkon21, I see that only one IPs named (170.247.33.105) that adding copyrighted works, so I report that IP to
AIV.
36.76.229.70 (
talk) 21:34, 24 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Indefinite semi-protection: It looks like I forgot to list this page when I
requested for the other Help:Intro series talk pages. All of the rest of them except for the table tutorial are semi-protected due to persistent test edits from new users, and this page receives at least as much of that as the others. {{u|Sdkb}}talk 21:28, 24 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Edit warring between anonymous users.
JIMBOB8 (
talk) 22:20, 24 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Longstanding problems. Let's give it another year.
MelanieN (
talk) 23:26, 24 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 14:41, 26 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of
unsourced or poorly sourced content – An IP editor has been slow-motion edit-warring for months, repeatedly adding the unsourced label "far-right" to the first sentence of the lead. I have attempted to discuss this on the article talk page, but received no response.
gnu57 13:57, 26 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – We've got a lot of sockpuppetry vandalism going on.
Scorpions13256 (
talk) 17:01, 26 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 17:27, 26 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. The one and only
4thfile4thrank {
talk} 14:19, 26 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 14:41, 26 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: In the middle of a few days of continued IP vandalism, probably coming from a fan forum.
Alyo(
chat·
edits) 14:36, 26 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamieTalk 16:37, 26 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Non-admin commentTbhotch, i see that only one IP that conduct it's distruptive behavior. I report these IP to
AIV.
36.76.229.70 (
talk) 04:47, 26 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 10:25, 26 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Already protected. For the bot.
(CC)Tbhotch™ 13:20, 26 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – this will continue all throughout the upcoming AFL trade period if nothing is done; two weeks should suffice.
4TheWynne(talk•contribs) 11:00, 26 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 11:40, 26 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Already protected. For the bot.
(CC)Tbhotch™ 13:21, 26 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – It's STILL happening. They're still repeatedly adding that nonsense about her returning as host of You've Been Framed. Can we protect the article again, please?.
Thegreatluigi (
talk) 13:22, 26 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection.
MelanieN (
talk) 00:18, 26 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – Persistent removal of CSD tag by multiple anons with no other edits (obviously the creator). —
teb728tc 01:07, 26 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Note: Handled the CSD rather than protecting the page.
GorillaWarfare(talk) 01:53, 26 October 2020 (UTC)reply
@
Marchjuly: No objection from me. I've moved the deleted page there in case they wish to do so.
GorillaWarfare(talk) 03:30, 26 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Indefinite pending changes: Persistent
vandalism – Vandalized by anon ips that are changing the nationality without adding sources or discussing at talk.
StoyanStoyanov80 (
talk) 14:09, 25 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
MelanieN (
talk) 00:20, 26 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Indefinite pending changes: Persistent addition of
unsourced or poorly sourced content – Vandalized by anon ips that are changing the nationality without adding sources or discussing at talk.
StoyanStoyanov80 (
talk) 14:09, 25 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
MelanieN (
talk) 00:21, 26 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent, unsourced changes to the band members section from IP users.
Bowling is life (
talk) 21:16, 25 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk) 01:06, 26 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Check edit history of this FL, full of add, remove, restore. Temporary semi-protection might give a full stop.
25 CENTS VICTORIOUS☣✅ 15:04, 25 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Problem edits are not frequent enough to justify semi-protection.
MelanieN (
talk) 00:45, 26 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: Consistent edit-warring between IP editors about the number of the games. In addition, IP editors tend to add unsourced content. –
Sabbatino (
talk) 20:05, 25 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk) 00:50, 26 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Note: Looks like SP would preserve unsourced edits. Looks like this is under discussion at ANI and elsewhere. --Deepfriedokra(talk) 20:13, 27 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Done, both blocked--
Ymblanter (
talk) 21:38, 27 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection. The one user who was being disruptive has been blocked.
MelanieN (
talk) 02:23, 27 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Constantly vandalized by people arguing over his nationality without adding sources or discussing at talk.
James Richards (
talk) 13:21, 27 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – Persistent slow-moving edit warring by several new editors repeately removing the same sourced content; not responding to talk page or warnings. Some type of protection is necessary.
Netherzone (
talk) 19:49, 26 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Repeated unnecessary edits that go against standard practice by new or anon accounts (mainly repeated edits by
141.8.10.31) that add confusing and unnecessary material to the infobox of the player. I have tried to engage the user on their talk page, but I have received no reply, and the unnecessary edits have continued. I request that the user is either temporarily banned from editing
Will Donkin's page or that page is given temporary semi-protection. Thank you.
Anwegmann (
talk) 20:06, 26 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing from a number of new SPAs and IP editors. Most recent activity is disruptive or managing disruption.
Ralbegen (
talk) 10:12, 27 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk) 12:10, 27 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Full protection If a template is always used on the main page (via
Template:Wikipedia languages), then there's no point in is not being full-protected; all template protecting it accomplishes is to make it appear to template editors that they can edit the page when they, in practice, can't.
* Pppery *it has begun... 13:15, 26 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 14:41, 26 October 2020 (UTC)reply
I'm requesting full protection on top of the already existing cascading protection. The bot is confused.
* Pppery *it has begun... 17:25, 26 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Declined This is not a valid reason to change the protection of a page. It's already fully protected via cascading protection. I don't think this is very confusing for template editors.
‑Scottywong| [chatter] || 05:46, 27 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Indefinite semi-protection: The article is being repeatedly edited by many persons in a way contrary to WP:NPOV, mainly by citing unreliable sources which each tell their own glowing tales of the language.
Wilhelm Tell DCCXLVIconverse |
fings wot i hav dun 15:35, 26 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Declined Disruptive editing seems to be coming from one user. I have blocked that user for 72 hours.
‑Scottywong| [spout] || 05:58, 27 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection for a month should be enough to protect this article from IP editors trying to add fake images to it.
Debresser (
talk) 17:34, 26 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 17:58, 26 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – Various IP addresses have continuously disruptive editing by removing
spoilers repeatedly non-stop. —
YoungForever(talk) 15:33, 26 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 17:58, 26 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Edited by new or anon accounts that change the nationality of this public figure without adding sources or discussing at talk.
StoyanStoyanov80 (
talk) 12:39, 26 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
MelanieN (
talk) 02:12, 27 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Persistent vandalism after the confirmation of Barrett.
Snickers2686 (
talk) 01:46, 27 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Move protectedindefinitely. Semi-protection may not prove to be necessary now that she is confirmed, but move warring is a serious and immediate problem. If article vandalism persists, ask again.
MelanieN (
talk) 02:38, 27 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary pending changes: Persistent
vandalism – After Coney was confirmed, IP vandal take advantages to vandalize the article. For me, a PC or semi-protection would be necessary.
36.65.46.79 (
talk) 02:02, 27 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk) 02:41, 27 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Thank you
MelanieN, i think this article is too high to give pending changes protection given the current events regardig the approval and also a
WP:ARBAP2, so semi protection would be necessary.
36.65.46.79 (
talk) 05:02, 27 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – High amount of disruptive edits in the last week.
Roller26 (
talk) 12:42, 26 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protectedindefinitely. The article has needed virtually continuous protection for the last several years, and it is too heavily edited for PC protection to work well.
MelanieN (
talk) 02:20, 27 October 2020 (UTC)reply
NoteCLCStudent, this article is a TFA, which has prone to vandalism from IP users once the FA article posted everyday.
36.76.229.70 (
talk) 13:10, 26 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Although the problems are most likely over now that the article is off the front page.--
MelanieN (
talk) 02:32, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
MelanieN (
talk) 02:32, 27 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary full-protection: Multi-party edit war since early October. --
BrownHairedGirl(talk) • (
contribs) 01:14, 26 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I think PC may be able to handle it. Also I note that the worst offender has been blocked.
MelanieN (
talk) 00:22, 27 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: Persistent
sockpuppetry – See the identical edits by these blocked accounts yesterday
[45][46] and this IP today
[47].
Alivardi(talk) 12:14, 26 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk) 00:25, 27 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: Earlier, this page recieved a lot of disruptive editing, and later got semi-protected until the 3rd of October. After that date the page continued to receive a lot of diruptive editing by unregistered users, you will see this in the page history. Most of the times the disruptive editing has to be manually reverted, on almost a daily basis.
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk) 00:18, 27 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: Pertinent and cited information again removed after protection request was declined yesterday.
Usefamin (
talk) 14:25, 25 October 2020 (UTC)reply
For "pertinent and cited" read "contentious from a
WP:BLP perspective". The text that was added contained a number of statements that weren't supported by the sources given, so it was edited accordingly. That isn't disruption requiring article protection. This request looks like an attempt to gain the upper hand in a
WP:CONTENTDISPUTE and should be declined.
SuperMarioMan (
Talk) 17:37, 25 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of
dispute resolution. Furthermore,
Usefamin should realize that semi-protection is not in their best interest. At this time, it would provide them (and their IP) from editing the article.
Favonian (
talk) 17:11, 26 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: This is beyond satirical, for 6 years this page has been the target of consistent vandalism. The vandals are from what I've seen, are all editing from IP addresses.
Saedes (
talk) 22:30, 26 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. He keeps changing dates and removing contents.
Beshogur (
talk) 18:19, 27 October 2020 (UTC)reply
DeclinedWrong venue. A report about single IP vandalism/disruption belongs on
WP:AIV or
WP:ANEW. OhNoitsJamieTalk 18:26, 27 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Declined – for the bot.
Favonian (
talk) 16:39, 28 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last
8 days.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 17:10, 28 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. The one and only
4thfile4thrank {
talk} 13:13, 28 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 14:54, 28 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – One editor desperately pushing his personal view that blog post of Marc Couwenbergh are reliable sources despite them being shot down at
Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_314#Marc_Couwenbergh. In all his efforts, editor only proved that Marc Couwenberg is a paid writer on art, not an art historian as editor claims. This is now become a slow burning edit war combined with POV-pushing. The Bannertalk 14:25, 27 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – One editor desperately pushing his personal view that blog post of Marc Couwenbergh are reliable sources despite them being shot down at
Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_314#Marc_Couwenbergh. In all his efforts, editor only proved that Marc Couwenberg is a paid writer on art, not an art historian as editor claims. This is now become a slow burning edit war combined with POV-pushing. The Bannertalk 14:26, 27 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Declined@
Back ache: Per the comment I left at article talk, I have warned the new user that they must wait for consensus in the discussion on talk. Ping me if problems persist (although I probably won't respond quickly).
Johnuniq (
talk) 08:57, 28 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Declined It's not possible for an uninformed administrator to know why the edits are
vandalism. There should be brief explanation on each article talk page regarding the disagreement, preferably with a
reliable source to support the argument.
Johnuniq (
talk) 09:06, 28 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection - Williams is currently the subject of unproven allegations about sexual misconduct with a 15-year-old, resulting in large volumes of vandalism to his article. Semi-protection for at least a week would seem warranted. –
PeeJay 10:52, 28 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 12:09, 28 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
Vandalism. High level of distruptive IP vandalism after becoming a TFA.
36.65.46.79 (
talk) 23:39, 27 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Comment, it will be off main page in 16 minutes.
(CC)Tbhotch™ 23:44, 27 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Declined Looks like the problems have stopped for now.
Johnuniq (
talk) 08:29, 28 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. Three reverted edits in the last 24 hours, one of which doesn't appear to be disruptive. The other two in short succession by the same IP. A little early to be jumping into protection right now, please feel free to renominate if any problems persist.
Kosack (
talk) 07:49, 28 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary pending changes protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. In recent months this article has had 150,000 bytes of content deleted by one editor, who appears to have engaged in a personal attack via sockpuppet investigation. I don't want to see this editor or any other editor blocked. I would like to work with other editors to improve the article. But I would like some kind of supervision so that large deletions don't happen.
The Little Platoon (
talk) 06:27, 28 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Declined@
The Little Platoon: Pending changes would not help with what you want. This is a content dispute which needs to be discussed at the article talk page, perhaps with a request at a relevant wikiproject for others to offer opinions (try the talk page of
Wikipedia:Australian Wikipedians' notice board).
Johnuniq (
talk) 08:41, 28 October 2020 (UTC)reply
IP editors keep adding tracklist lengths and genres without sources.
Bowling is life (
talk) 21:58, 27 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. This is a content dispute and the editors concerned are all autoconfirmed.
Cwmhiraeth (
talk) 07:34, 28 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – Persistent mis-characterization of sources / competence issue (with socking) for a little more than a year.
Dawnseeker2000 23:06, 27 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Cwmhiraeth (
talk) 07:29, 28 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: Page unprotected since June 2020 and the vast majority of edits made since then are vandalism from disgruntled Doctor Who fans.
Wikibenboy94 (
talk) 09:29, 28 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Johnuniq (
talk) 09:41, 28 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – Protection just lifted, and we're back to the same sort of disruption as last time. Eostrix (
🦉 hoothoot🦉) 07:44, 27 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 13:20, 27 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Declined Article was protected but then, on request, was unprotected because there was infrequent disruption.
Johnuniq (
talk) 05:54, 28 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: This article was split off
2020 Nagorno-Karabakh conflict which is under extended-confirmed protection - and comprised a significant part of the original article. Therefore for the same reasoning that the original article is protected I think the split-off article should be protected too.
LOLCaatz (
talk) 11:57, 27 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Note: Just as the main article is protection doesn't mean that timeline article should be protected too. Doesn't
LOLCaatz know there was a vandalism in there? If not,
pages cannot be protected preemptively. Pages can be protected only if there was persistent distruptive editing or vandalism in the article.
36.65.46.79 (
talk) 12:33, 27 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Declined As the IP says, there needs to be evidence of disruption before protection occurs.
Johnuniq (
talk) 05:56, 28 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent
vandalism – There is constant reordering of the cast. The film has the order per the credits and no IP user should change that.
TamilMirchi (
talk) 20:18, 27 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent
vandalism – Persistent vandalism due to frequent changes on infobox where unregistered users (mostly) keep changing to a state belonging to Philippines. It was previously protected multiple times, only to once the protection was expired, another vandalism occurs.
WPSamson (
talk) 03:02, 27 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Non-admin commentWPSamson, i see there are very few vandalism that happens in this article. Because this, the article is more likely a pending changes or semi protection instead.
36.65.46.79 (
talk) 04:59, 27 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Johnuniq (
talk) 05:44, 28 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – IP keep vandalizing the article.
Enjoyer of World💬 07:53, 28 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Protected by another admin.
Johnuniq (
talk) 08:42, 28 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – Repeated changes to nationality by various IP's going back several months. Robvanvee 14:16, 27 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: An IP is adding unsourced content repeatedly to this redirect page, and insists on removing the redirect.
D🐶ggy54321(
let's chat!) 23:49, 27 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 00:34, 28 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Protected by another admin.
Johnuniq (
talk) 08:30, 28 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism during World Series.
Dmoore5556 (
talk) 02:55, 28 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 03:50, 28 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Protected by another admin.
Johnuniq (
talk) 08:33, 28 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. IP editors keep trying to make this the Dodgers' home field
RBBrittain (
talk) 03:58, 28 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Johnuniq (
talk) 08:34, 28 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – Repeated changes to nationality by various IP's going back several months. Robvanvee 14:15, 27 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistant vandalism by pan-Turkist propagandists to gain international sympathies for their cause.
ZaDoraemonzu (
talk) 04:20, 28 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism shortly after a temporary semi-protection was placed on the article for the second time. Constant addition of unsourced or poorly sourced information.
Sqall2 (
talk) 04:31, 28 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk) 07:38, 28 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: The existing semi-protection is not enough. Now attacks on the article come from auto-confirmed accounts. The same guys have recently been blocked in the ru-wiki, and the protection level of the article has been raised to “only administrators can edit”. In the case of en-wiki, I suppose there will be sufficient extended-confirmed level protection. --
Khinkali (
talk) 18:43, 27 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Commenttalk, You see the users that engaging distruptive behavior (
Full.team) is blocked from editing, and arguments that in the ru-wiki the protection level of the article has been raised to “only administrators can edit” has not relevant. In ru-wiki, this is due to edit warring/content dispute. You see any content dispute in en-wiki? IMO, the request should be declined due to fact that users conducting distruptive behavior is now blocked.
36.65.46.79 (
talk) 19:08, 27 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Nope. I see another not-yet-blocked user (
1BELASSR) and guess there may be other accounts. --
Khinkali (
talk) 19:15, 27 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – An ip address and not autoconfirmed editor have continuously vandalizing the article by deliberately adding incorrect information non-stop. —
YoungForever(talk) 23:03, 27 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Cwmhiraeth (
talk) 07:22, 28 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – There is an extreme lack of consensus regarding the genre of this song. It rapidly changes from electronic rock to alt-metal, electronic rock AND alt-metal, electronic rock, alt-metal and electropop, and variations thereof.
JJPMaster (
talk) 11:57, 27 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Johnuniq (
talk) 05:58, 28 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Recurring IP edits inserting a date of death for the last two weeks.
Koncorde (
talk) 13:43, 27 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Johnuniq (
talk) 06:02, 28 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 16:01, 27 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Protected by another admin.
Johnuniq (
talk) 06:03, 28 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Article has not been protected before so protection has to escalate.
Johnuniq (
talk) 05:50, 28 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: persistent removal of controversies over sexual assault. I'm not entirely sure what to write here, but he guy is accused of sexual assault and severely inappropriate behavior with his students, and the controversy isn't even addressed with factual terms about what happened. Every time someone adds links to the news articles explaining the situation, it gets removed. it would be nice if the links and accusations could stay on, to protect the community he is in.
Moralltach9 (
talk) 02:34, 28 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of
dispute resolution. Per
WP:BLP, you'll need some strong sourcing for that; I did a quick search and saw one article about an accusation in 2017 and not much else. OhNoitsJamieTalk 02:47, 28 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Continuing vandalism. This subject is considered fairly controversial as well.
Gsquaredxc (
talk) 03:26, 28 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last
8 days.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 03:35, 28 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Johnuniq (
talk) 05:43, 28 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Just to make clear, there's no "edit warring". I am reverting a career sockpuppet vandal whose previous IP was blocked only hours ago. I came here to request protection.
Dory Funk (
talk) 20:49, 27 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 21:02, 27 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Already protected by administrator CaptainEek. Semi-protected for 1 week. -- LuK3(Talk) 02:31, 28 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – multi-IP and new user vandalism restarted as soon as protection ended.
Meters (
talk) 22:46, 27 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 23:48, 27 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Already protected by administrator Ponyo. Semi-protected for 1 week. -- LuK3(Talk) 02:32, 28 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. Only one instance of IP vandalism in the past week. -- LuK3(Talk) 02:33, 28 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 12 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Deepfriedokra(talk) 01:50, 29 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Note: only two recent instances, so maybe enuf --Deepfriedokra(talk) 01:50, 29 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Already protected. The bot conflicts with the "Note" template.
(CC)Tbhotch™ 22:16, 29 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Automated comment:@
Tbhotch: One or more pages in this request have not been protected.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 22:29, 29 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Requesting immediate archiving...(CC)Tbhotch™ 22:31, 29 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Reduction in protection level: From semi-protection. There doesn't appear to have been any vandalism in the past decade. The protecting administrator is inactive.
207.161.86.162 (
talk) 01:04, 29 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Declined. This is too obvious a target for schoolboy vandalism to be unprotected. The absence of vandalism merely indicates that the semi-protection works as intended.
Favonian (
talk) 16:13, 29 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Wouldn't that be a preemptive measure?
WP:SEMI provides that "Semi-protection should [not] be used as a preemptive measure against vandalism that has not yet occurred". The article appears to have been vandalized only 4 times over the course of 14 years.
207.161.86.162 (
talk) 18:26, 29 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Currently a large edit war rages, it may need a cool down period for a few days.
Ifnord (
talk) 02:48, 29 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Fully protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamieTalk 13:07, 29 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: Persistent
sockpuppetry – The IPs are obviously socking by Yeeterdeletus, who is indeffed, and are disruptive in any case. Crossroads-talk- 04:35, 29 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 09:22, 29 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: Surprised this hasn't been protected yet. Article has been disrupted multiple times recently due to the ongoing 2020
Nagorno-Karabakh conflict.
HistoryofIran (
talk) 15:53, 29 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Favonian (
talk) 16:25, 29 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary move protection: There is a discussion about naming the page something else, and there's a warning to not move the page.
a gd fan (
talk) 17:18, 28 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. I don't see any current disruption that would justify protecting the page. The last non-confirmed edit was 10 days ago.
Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 19:01, 28 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection:BLP policy violations – There has been >10 instances of vandalism/BLP violations (mostly defamatory content) in the past few days from ip users. Probably linked to recent news coverage of Jack Dorsey and Twitter.
Lookunder (
talk) 05:10, 29 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --
Bongwarrior (
talk) 07:35, 29 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Since my previous request was denied a week ago, there have been more acts of vandalism (including 2 today). Username6892(
Peer Review) 02:07, 29 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last
8 days.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 02:12, 29 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Constant reversal of an IP’s removal of sourced material.
TropicAces (
talk) 00:45, 29 October 2020 (UTC)tropicAcesreply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Protected specifically for
disruptive editing as the edits are not vandalism. Hopefully should encourage talk page discussion.
Dreamy Jazztalk to me | my contributions 00:51, 29 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Blocked user abusing his talkpage to post insults against the blocking admin, including insults in edit summaries.
Victor Schmidt (
talk) 20:39, 28 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Temporary since she will be elevated to the Lords after standing down at the 2021 election per source, at which time changes can be made which should stop the vandalism.
Alex (
talk) 00:14, 29 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Airplaneman(talk)✈ 00:28, 29 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Requesting page protection owing to persistent vandalism and a few counterproductive edits in the recent past. Thank you.
Mouryan (
talk) 16:16, 30 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Indefinite semi-protection: The article
was already semi-protected in the past and we keep getting a good level of IP vandalism (about 40 disruptive edits this month alone). I think it qualifies for indefinite semi-protection. Thanks.
T8612(talk) 17:53, 30 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – Req 1 week semi-protection. Repeated contravention of
WP:TVPLOT by IP hoppers insistent upon adding episode-by-episode details to the summary section instead of creating a proper list of episodes. This is the sort of ignorance that is prolific across Indian TV articles and there is no way to educate anybody.
Cyphoidbomb (
talk) 20:18, 30 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk) 20:33, 30 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Non-administrator comment, this page already seems to be pending changes protected. — Yours,
Berrely •
Talk∕
Contribs 14:56, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
reply
That is true, however non-constructive and bad faith edits have continued, mostly by IP's. I felt that semi-protection would be more appropriate here so as to reduce the workload on pending-changes reviewers and page watchers. If this is not standard practice, please do let me know. Prolix💬 15:52, 30 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. @
Prolix: you were correct, that is standard practice if it is getting too busy. There were too many edits for PC to be effective so I removed it (for the one day it had left).
Woody (
talk) 15:55, 30 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – It's been less than 24 hours since the page protection for the article was lifted and the hoppy IP's have reverted back to adding unsourced promotional info regarding upcoming programming and programming schedules both in violation of
WP:NOTPROMOTION and
WP:NOTDIR. The only solution in sight is protecting the page for atleast a while in the near future.
TheRedDomitor (
talk) 15:12, 30 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Woody (
talk) 15:56, 30 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism by one or more unregistered editors using different IP addresses. The vandalism is subtle and has been occurring for at least a month.
ElKevbo (
talk) 06:32, 30 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Declined –
Warn the user appropriately then report them to
AIV or
ANI if they continue. Looks like one main IP is doing most of it with one other IP editing once, best to deal with that IP. Given they're on a final warning, report to AIV if they do it again. Callanecc (
talk •
contribs •
logs) 11:59, 30 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Extended-confirmed protection: Since June of this year multiple new accounts (most likely socks of
User:Walter Ezequiel Matthysse Jr.) have been attempting to hijack the article in favour of the subject's son. –
2.
O.
Boxing 13:48, 30 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I've also blocked the last 2 editors and put it under PC for 6 months given the persistence of the disruptive editing.
Woody (
talk) 15:49, 30 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – IPs edit warring over whether it is an Ottoman or an Albanian victory. Seems to me to be part of a larger pattern of nationalistic edit wars.
DuncanHill (
talk) 13:53, 30 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Woody (
talk) 15:50, 30 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Kebab and Middle Eastern cuisine should in no way be ECP protected because most content in those articles is unrelated to the Arab-Israeli conflict. (
t ·
c) buidhe 22:52, 28 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. I don't see enough bad-faith edits to balance out the positive edits which are coming from the IPs. Callanecc (
talk •
contribs •
logs) 11:36, 30 October 2020 (UTC)reply
One year upload protection: Persistent addition of
unsourced or poorly sourced content in foreign relations of Turkey with other countries, believing to be serving Turkish government's propaganda to gain advantage. Need clarification and even deletion of a number of hoaxed relationship Ankara is seeking if we have a chance.
ZaDoraemonzu (
talk) 04:20, 29 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Declined I'm not seeing enough disruptive edits to warrant page protection at this stage. Callanecc (
talk •
contribs •
logs) 11:38, 30 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – High level of IP vandalism on the article; one IP user edited the same article over 55 times in just 1 month alone with vandalism.
DeltaGammaHedge (
talk) 03:30, 30 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism due to her being a politician who was forced to resign yesterday.
FDW777 (
talk) 12:23, 30 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Cwmhiraeth (
talk) 14:04, 30 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Recommend Extended-Confirmed protection in draft space. If a neutral editor wants to develop a draft, they can do so, and it will still have to be approved to get into article space. Otherwise socks may create more drafts that have to be trashed again.
Robert McClenon (
talk) 04:47, 30 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protectedindefinitely. I've put a semi on it. Given that the outcome of the AfD was to draftify it I want to leave it relatively open. Callanecc (
talk •
contribs •
logs) 11:52, 30 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection:BLP policy violations – This page is being repeatedly edited, mostly by new users or IP users, to add poorly sourced conspiracy theories about a sex tape involving Yifei and Hunter Biden. These conspiracy theories are politically motivated and potentially defamatory.
Ezlev (
talk) 04:49, 30 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – IP's keep adding unsourced information about upcoming programming and unnecessary programming schedules in violation of
WP:NOTPROMOTION and
WP:NOTDIR. I had the channel's corresponding List of programs article protected for a week for the same reason, so the IP's added the info here instead, evading the PP.
TheRedDomitor (
talk) 07:38, 30 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary full protection: The page has been vandalized by several sock puppets and new sock puppets keep popping up with many IP account edits. Sock puppets include Hugo Refachinho, Joseph220, Klotes, JJ Mag, Mark Boron and several more.
WanderingGeeljire (
talk) 19:05, 28 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Try the semi protection first, most of these accounts are new. Callanecc (
talk •
contribs •
logs) 11:28, 30 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – IP editors continuing to edit-war after principle accounts were blocked (one as a sock). Need semi-protection to get this madness to stop. Ravensfire (
talk) 00:53, 29 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last
8 days.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 00:57, 29 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Several editors have been edit warring on the article for few days now. I think it would best to get it fully page protected until it gets resolve. —
YoungForever(talk) 18:31, 29 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – IP Editor seems to be vandalizing page. The ARV queue is backed up and it will take some time for the clerk there to get to it. I will have to get to sleep in a bit and am not able to monitor this page longer.
Ktin (
talk) 07:09, 29 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent addition of
unsourced or poorly sourced content – Numerous unsourced additions and vandalism edits have been made since the prior protection expired on Oct. 12th, so it is likely best to protect it again to avoid this constant back-and-forth.
Trailblazer101 (
talk) 18:55, 28 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Protection: Persistent
vandalism — After semi-protection ended two months ago, most of edits by IP (and probably newly registered) editors have been reverted. It's been protected a few or several times prior.
George Ho (
talk) 21:08, 28 October 2020 (UTC)reply
CommentGeorge Ho, what does protection do you mean, do you means it needs pending changes protection as some other alphabetic letters?
36.76.229.22 (
talk) 21:43, 28 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Any kind of protection is fine. That's what I meant.
George Ho (
talk) 21:47, 28 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary full protection: The page should be protected because of repeated attempts to restore content deleted during a deletion discussion, which should require consensus at
deletion review. Can expire on Nov 3. Full protection necessary because some users are extended confirmed (
t ·
c) buidhe 22:20, 28 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 21:59, 29 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Already protected by administrator Vanamonde93. Fully protected through 21:37, 1 November 2020
GorillaWarfare(talk) 02:15, 30 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Deleted G11 / G12 four times in two days. If he's notable enough for an article, it will be without the honorific.
Captain Calm (
talk) 13:50, 29 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Last couple of days has seen a flurry of vandalism and unsourced edits.
William Avery (
talk) 13:52, 29 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary Semi-protection: Constant disruptive editing from new users lately as the page is about a town which is part of an ongoing conflict. —
CuriousGolden(talk·contrib) 14:01, 29 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Continual disruptive editing, usually with the goal of introducing transphobic material. — Czello 18:27, 29 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism.
Lukemassa (
talk) 03:30, 29 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. It's fairly low-level, but all IP recent contributions have been vandalism. --
Stephan Schulz (
talk) 23:47, 29 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – I feel like the references to Scott The Woz will never end, so I'm requesting a indefinite page protection from SoW vandalism.
CaptainGalaxy 22:06, 29 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: Low level persistent IP changing of birth date from 1930 to 1934, despite the sources including MQ's own birth certificate. This obsessive editing has been going on for a while now and the changes often go unchecked for several days at a time.
Mabalu (
talk) 23:37, 29 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 01:01, 30 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Persistent vandalism of this page. The subject is a controversial internet celebrity.
Hariboneagle927 (
talk) 01:24, 30 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: IP vandalism.
Cognissonance (
talk) 14:07, 28 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 06:05, 29 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: - persistent vandalism/test edits from a IP hopper.
GiantSnowman 20:58, 29 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 22:44, 29 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – A large majority of the recent edits of the page consist of vandalism.
EMachine03 (
talk) 13:49, 31 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Automated comment:@
MelanieN: One or more pages in this request have not been protected.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 19:58, 31 October 2020 (UTC)reply
@
MelanieN: Looks like you placed the response in the wrong section. The article you protected around that time was
Mask of Tutankhamun.
Favonian (
talk) 21:05, 31 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Note: I changed the target from "Marko Cepenkov" (a redirect) to "Marko Tsepenkov",
Favonian (
talk) 21:03, 31 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Favonian (
talk) 21:09, 31 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Recurrent vandalism by IPs and a one-time account. Please semi-protect for duration of AFD.
Robert McClenon (
talk) 16:12, 31 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk) 19:46, 31 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Fake news spread by
WP:LTA/BKFIP; user has been blocked long term so page protection probably not necessary anymore.
82.113.98.113 (
talk) 18:48, 31 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. The requesting IP's block log does not show a block. However, the person who claimed the requester was globally blocked actually is blocked. In any case there are multiple disruptive edits at the article coming from multiple IPs so semi-protection is appropriate.
MelanieN (
talk) 19:32, 31 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 12:56, 31 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – IPs have started adding improperly licensed images again after the protection period expired.
Fylindfotberserk (
talk) 13:16, 31 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 14:56, 31 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection:Vandalism, and beginning around October 26th, the repeated addition of references to the Youtuber Technoblade, alway uncited.
Darth Coracle (
talk) 08:40, 31 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 14:56, 31 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Requesting semi-protection for the purposes of a qualitative and quantitative review of the article, its contents and sources.
Grnrchst (
talk) 17:46, 31 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk) 18:33, 31 October 2020 (UTC)reply
SemiProtection or Full Protection:
Biography of Living Person who died within last 8 days. Persistent
disruptive editing and
Edit warring.
Reports circulated re: subject's death without citation on social media which was taken up by many sites. All subsequent edits and links for death date are unsourced or are poorly sourced based on FB, Twitter, blogs, or forums relating to unverified fan-report. Some links to reports are self-referential, citing Wikipedia:
Lenard Lakofka itself. While it's understandable fans want to make note of his passing,
Wikipedia is not a reliable source.
Another editor already posted <!--please provide any information on his death with a reliable source per [[WP:RS]]--> and it has been repeatedly ignored and deleted. --
IcarusATB (
talk) 18:23, 31 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk) 18:31, 31 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive edits by new users and IPs who keep adding unsourced or poorly sourced content in the article.
TheAmazingPeanuts (
talk) 17:56, 31 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., but some of the reverting users were autoconfirmed--
Ymblanter (
talk) 18:25, 31 October 2020 (UTC)reply
6 years (almost) have passed since the indefinite protection for persistent sockpuppetry and there is only 1 protection log entry for this page. Can the protection length be shortened or the page being unprotected. Lets give this another try. --
217.113.241.188 (
talk) 19:14, 30 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Automated comment:@
217.113.241.188: This request cannot be parsed. Please ensure it follows formatting consistent with the current or previous methods of submission.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 19:22, 30 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Not unprotected – Please use an
edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. I fixed the request for you (it needed the {{pagelinks}}). In terms of the article, you should normally discuss this with the protecting administrator (@
Nlu:.) As it is they aren't very active and may need see it. The article was protected because it is a favourite topic of a prolific vandal. As the vandal (or someone with the same obsession with the topic) is still active I don't feel comfortable reducing the protection.
Woody (
talk) 19:53, 30 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Hello
Woody Can you please tell me what the username of the person obsessed with this page is? --
217.113.241.188 (
talk) 20:12, 30 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Comment. I think I'm going to unprotect it on a trial basis. Please alert me (or another more active administrator) if signs of vandalism returns. Thanks. (As I mentioned elsewhere, between baby, COVID-19, and work, I've got very little bandwidth, but I do read my emails.) --
Nlu (
talk) 02:29, 31 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Persistent recreation of already existing article (the target).
Onel5969TT me 18:43, 30 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Persistent complete deletion of a new content, the whole published article, published by the undersigned in a previously void article (only a redirecting page) and misleading. The language of target page title matches the language of the content so any English speaking person looking for the target information (i.e. search for National Day of Spain) will find it. Instead, another page in English language displays a title in Spanish ("
Fiesta Nacional de España") which provokes a huge damage for any English speaking person will do the search in English not in Spanish. This is an illogical situation and inacceptable language appropriation that I seek to change by asking Wikipedia to protect the target page,
National Day of Spain, with its own content as I have first published it today in replacement of the simply redirection first. The user(s) claiming that there's an existing page about the same are not of good faith for the reason explained above as long as the other page title, "Fiesta Nacional de España", is in Spanish with the article content in English. I am a new contributor and I do not know much about the rules, the editing, etc.Thank you in advance for your assistance and for accepting my request
User:PLUS ULTRA CARLOS]] —Preceding
undated comment added 22:05, 30 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I will try to explain at the above new user's talk page.
MelanieN (
talk) 22:19, 30 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Repeated vandalism from different dynamic IP addresses.
Iaintfaking (
talk) 06:51, 31 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk) 11:32, 31 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Vandalism almost everyday, which needs reverting. High profile player.
JMHamo (
talk) 11:08, 31 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk) 11:36, 31 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Indefinite Extended-Confirmed protection: High level of IP vandalism that continues to show up in high numbers.
2600:1004:B052:E994:6063:1494:2132:5B7 (
talk) 17:54, 30 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Persistent vandalism from sockpuppet accounts making the same edit.
Benmite (
talk) 04:55, 31 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last
8 days.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 05:09, 31 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Reduction in protection level: from extended confirmed protection to semi-protection. The talk page is rather quiet and there has not been much issues. The protecting administrator is
User:Yamaguchi先生. I would like to add more to the page in the coming weeks, including maps and images from reputable sources. Thanks
WanderingGeeljire (
talk) 15:33, 30 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected. This request seems reasonable enough. I've reduced the protection to indefinite semi-protection. If the disruptive editing and/or vandalism resumes, it should be taken back to extended confirmed protection again.
‑Scottywong| [speak] || 05:25, 31 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Repeated unnecessary edits that go against standard practice by
141.8.10.31 that add confusing and unnecessary material to the infobox of the player. This user has been banned from editing for 72 hours before for the same unnecessary edits, but when the 72 hours elapsed, they immediately continued the unnecessary edits. I have tried to engage the user on their talk page, as has
Ohnoitsjamie, but the user has not responded or change their actions. I request that the user is either permanently banned from editing
Will Donkin's page or that page is given semi-protection. Thank you.
Anwegmann (
talk) 19:11, 30 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last
8 days.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 19:22, 30 October 2020 (UTC)reply
I don't understand, as one of the requests was approved and acted upon by
Ohnoitsjamie. The vandalism, however, has continued.
Anwegmann (
talk) 19:25, 30 October 2020 (UTC)reply
No need for protection when the disruption is coming from a single IP. The IP has been blocked again for a longer duration. OhNoitsJamieTalk 20:56, 30 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism, and throwaway account edits intending on attacking one member of the group the page is about.
Cap dz (
talk) 02:31, 31 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Persistent IPs removing content rather than engaging in discussion on talk page. Could use some cooling off time.
ZimZalaBimtalk 04:11, 31 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Ongoing disruptive edits. Previous semi-protection was for a year, and when that doesn't seem to have helped, I don't believe only doing so temporarily will be helpful.
SNUGGUMS (
talk /
edits) 20:42, 30 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary pending changes.Natadmim (
talk) 23:06, 30 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Declined – Pending changes protection
should not be used on pages with a high edit rate. There aren't enough bad-faith edits to overcome the good-faith ones and justify semi protection. Callanecc (
talk •
contribs •
logs) 01:45, 31 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary extended protection: Disruptive editing, editing disputes, minor edit warring. Primarily over the description of the government in the infobox.
Sergei zavorotko (
talk) 01:15, 31 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Enormous amounts of vandalism, edit warring, and possible astroturfing over the last few days. —{Canucklehead} 02:27, 31 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Reduction in protection level: to semi-protection. Page mentioned has only just been made available for editors to adjust (1-2 weeks) and has already been upped in protection level. Protection level was upped due to another user notifying admin of content deletion (of which I had no involvement - request/notification can be seen on talk page of wiki subject). Admin also cites upped protection due to a single removal of "unreliable source" tag. I removed the tag and provided an explanation of my reasoning to do so in the comments (edit in question regarded a TNO source, a well known Dutch research institute which even has its own wiki page). I reviewed wiki's policies for proper sourcing and also checked the source in question myself. I would have happily allowed another user to undo the removal of the tag and further disputed the change on the talk page. Upping of the protection level seems, to me, quite a knee jerk reaction in this instance for such minor changes. Give the page a month or two to reach consensus and edits will calm down significantly I am sure. It is not unusual that after years of being unable to edit people within the community are eager to build the wiki page. Currently, myself and other (relatively new) wiki contributors are unable to make edits to improve the page due to 30 day limit/ few edits. New contributors have only just begun trying to improve the page as it has been inactive for quite some time and recently been made available again. Thank you for your consideration & second opinion on the matter.
Blockchainus Maximus (
talk) 20:35, 29 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Not unprotected This article was protected under
Wikipedia:General sanctions/Blockchain and cryptocurrencies. As such it cannot be unprotected without the approval of the sanctioning administrator or by an appeal to
WP:AN. I can see that you have asked
User:EdJohnston to reduce the protection and they have directed you here. I can't disagree with the protection given the conversation on Ed's talk page. This is a contentious area that attracts a stream of
WP:COI and
WP:NPOV editors If you wish to make edits to the page please suggest them on the talkpage.
Woody (
talk) 15:37, 30 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Thank you
Woody for your reply and hints as to how to potentially resolve the issue. I will post edits on the talk page for now then and perhaps use your suggestion to file an appeal in this case, if they indeed concur that it was appropriate there is not much I can do about that I suppose. I simply found it strange that for a simple deletion of a single tag (with justification as you can see on Ed's talk page) was used as justification to prevent edits (in addition to, ironically, deletions by users with over 500+ edits - complaint by
User:Kuckuckz). Although I and others (so it seems) would want to come to a consensus it is made far more difficult with this level of protection. As stated in my comment above there has been a flurry of activity as the page has only been open for 1-2 weeks for new users to edit / improve upon so it is only natural there will be some disagreement initially before reaching consensus. As the topic of cardano is incredibly "niche" many knowledgeable individuals (who aren't usually wiki contributors) are hampered from providing improvements (the talk page is nice but progress moves at snail pace). Thank you for considering it and your advice, definitely true we as editors must try to remain as neutral and un-biased as possible with factual, well referenced edits. User
IOHKwriter may also be interested to see this.
Blockchainus Maximus (
talk) 16:01, 30 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Unconfirmed users consistently adding biased information about Walter Wallace's rap music without edit summary.
Benmite (
talk) 18:16, 30 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
MelanieN (
talk) 22:34, 30 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – Page has recently been plagued by ongoing edit-warring between IP's (most likelly the same person) and registered editors (multiple).
Vif12vf/Tiberius (
talk) 21:03, 30 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Non-admin comment The multiple registered users that engage in edit warring with a single IP have ECP status so ECP doesn't sufficent to prevent edit warring. Maybe a full or semi-protection instead. Therefore, i also report one IP (89.164.212.8) that involve in edit warring to
AIV.
180.244.123.24 (
talk) 22:01, 30 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of
unsourced or poorly sourced content – Please protect this for 72 hours, to get us past aspirational new editors adding their own personal experiences without any references because it's on their cultural RADARs. Thanks. Julietdeltalima(talk) 16:47, 30 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
MelanieN (
talk) 22:08, 30 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Temporary full protection: Persistent
vandalism – 10 to 12 attempts were made to revert the redirect which was achieved through consensus. I previously asked for full protection but was only semi protected. My fear came true, any new user now can revert the page, or any experience editor. Please place a full protection even if its for temporary period, but that what it needs, other protection are evidently not helpful.
Drat8sub (
talk) 21:02, 28 October 2020 (UTC)reply
There is no consensus on the RFC. The consensus was based on the votes by SPA's. It has been discussed on the admins' noticeboard and, the consensus was to overturn the redirect per the discussion on the
Administrators' noticeboard. See the discussion on the
same regard.--
Akhiljaxxn (
talk) 01:39, 29 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: There has been a years long 'tradition' of edit-warring over the pronouns used in the article by activists (despite every discussion coming to the same end: use male pronouns because historians do). Here we have another flare-up in such activity. I think permanent semi-protection will eventually be needed.
Mr rnddude (
talk) 22:02, 30 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Already protected by administrator Ponyo.
Favonian (
talk) 22:17, 30 October 2020 (UTC)reply