/Archive 1 /Archive 2 /Archive 3 /Archive 4 /Archive 5 /Archive 6 /Archive 7 /Archive 8 /Archive 9 /Archive 10 |
I prefer to keep conversations together and usually respond here, so please watch this page for my reply. I move old conversations to the archive, usually once a year.
To leave a message on this page, please
click here.
In these little british towns, almost all people are white british. The white british girls are the easy target for the foreign sex rings. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2800:484:7E80:1F00:F158:FA18:2C98:EE11 ( talk) 06:23, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
I saw the message and alteration on why the change, but there was a reason for the alteration I made as a historian, specifically African and African American historian.
If I may… Black Culture is not the same as African Culture, and this is confusing to many people. It’s not taking about black people as much as it is talking about specific “culture”. It is looked at as a full term, not separating words, similar to tennis shoe or basketball. Taking the words apart give different meaning.
African culture is founded within the continent of Africa, and the groups of that continent never in history referred to their cultures as “Black Culture”. Many didn’t and still don’t refer to themselves as Black. There cultures are such as Igbo culture, Zulu culture etc. per their ethnic groups.
Black Culture is what African Americans named their culture as it emerged at the Harlem Renaissance and in the 1960s, coming out of the United States of America. They named their culture Black Culture because they had already referred to themselves as Black, unlike anyone on the African Continent or Caribbean. The later to places only referred to themselves by their ethnic group.
This is noted is several historic documents and elders today around the globe. The issue isn’t if there are more black (as in race) around world. The point is that African American (Black American) (Black) in the USA and abroad refers automatically to African Americans because everyone knows the history and cultural context of Black Culture.
It has been an offense to call or rename “Zulu culture” or any other African or Caribbean CULTURE, Black Culture, when speaking of their ancient cultures. It is respectful to call it what it is, and not change it.
Black Culture is singular, not plural. African cultures are founded in Africa…. not saying by race many are not black, but a whole North side isn’t and many on the East are offended in being called Black. They are proud of their culture as Somali or Ethiopian Culture.
People move into America and assimilate into Black Culture (African American culture), but they know their birth ethnicity and ethnic culture of parents.
Ethnicity and broad “phenotype race” are different. We are black people by race(what we look like) but African Culture (really should say cultures), is different than Black Culture which emerged in the USA in the 1900s. The other cultures were already alive and thriving for thousands of years prior.
AA have always referred to themselves as Black ie. Black History Month, Black Panthers, Black… this is unlike any other. People who are not of the phenotype black may not know this, but if one searches anywhere, online or off, the words Black Culture pulls up African American. The words African culture pulls of the wonderful cultures that are thousands of years old, founded in Africa.
I am hoping you understand as I tried to explain as best I could. Thank you for your time. Be well. Sorry for any typos in this message because I didn’t look it over.
172.75.146.57 (
talk) 21:01, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
Hi, a user you’ve recently had dealings with is continuing to post spam links on various pages. In my personal opinion the user should be banned. Looking at their edit history, shows they have no interest in making useful contributions and instead will continue to cause disruption. I’m not entirely sure the user isn’t a bot. Could you please assist? Kind regards Lukejordan02 ( talk) 19:50, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
Why did you revert my edits when new IMF data proves that? And why didn't you revert edits to other Developed countries or do u only revert African countries? Nlivataye ( talk) 11:06, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Coastal artillery, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) ( talk) 05:43, 1 June 2023 (UTC)
I noticed your concern about what-when-how.com as a source. The reference you removed from Beetle was copied from the Encyclopedia of Insects chapter on the Colorado potato beetle, which can be seen on Google books. Clearly there is no need to cite what-when-how.com when the original source is an alternative.
However, when I went to add the citation, I saw that the article has nothing to do with the topic in the beetle article (the thorax). So not only is the source dubious, it is being used inappropriately. I don't see the point, but it seems some sort of spam exercise. — Jts1882 | talk 10:46, 3 June 2023 (UTC)
Hi, thanks for restoring my additions on Soviet military occupations to military occupation. However, John Yunshire ( Special:Contributions/John Yunshire) also reverted multiple other related edits, which I restored, related to history and the USSR/Russia. One of the most strange is his revert on Nostalgia for the Soviet Union where he restored the unsourced claim that the Russian government is "anti-communist". I do not what is the rationale for the user's reverts, while he claims to be pro-Ukraine. 85.249.16.120 ( talk) 09:47, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Coastal artillery, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) ( talk) 11:48, 5 June 2023 (UTC)
Please read the history about the Red Rock under the history about Red Reck on Wikipedia website with Red Rock beverages and please read also Red Rock today on Wikipedia website about Red Rock (beverage).
After the 1950s, the Red Rock Company seemed to vanish entirely and it is unknown when the company disestablished. An orphaned affiliate continued producing the product in the Dominican Republic, and it is now distributed there by the Cervecería Nacional Dominicana. The formulas for Red Rock's carbonated beverage products survive and are now owned by Sensient Technologies of Indianapolis, Indiana, which has its own network of distributors.[1] http://soda-pops.blogspot.com/2006/09/red-rock-cola_05.html?m=1 Clayton Distributors of Atlanta is a major distributor of Red Rock branded ginger ale and cola. [2] https://www.bizjournals.com/atlanta/stories/1998/07/27/smallb1.html?page=2
So yes you are wrong. Yes That actually is also about the American brand but also the Dominican brand products.
please read the whole thing before you delete anything at all, just remember that okay
Red Rock Premium, Red Rock Cola, Red Rock Beverages and Red Rock Ginger Ale US only:
Red Rock soft drinks Dominican Republic only:
[1] [2] [3] 91.100.157.11 ( talk) 14:21, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
That thing has nothing to do with that hijack at all of course you haft to use articles for all things here on Wikipedia or if not, that thing will be remove it without any reliable sources at all and but should read some other articles as well and they say a lot of those things about the American product and the Dominican product and what is available and what is not the Dominican Republic at all Red Rock and Red Rock have only made this product only for the Dominican Republic, only because I know it I have been into Dominican republic many times, because I am a part Dominican yes half Dominican. And I have been seeing this product with my own eyes. And tasted it. Have you ever been in this country before because if not sure, please travel to the Dominican Republic and see that with your own eyes, and all the other products and things from the Dominican Republic and a lot of different flowers, plants and animals that only exist in that area is the country and also in Haiti.
References
See WP:LTA/GRP. Meters ( talk) 18:07, 15 July 2023 (UTC)
im Just rollbacking the edits of Sockpuppet Giubbotto non ortodosso Aardlion67 ( talk) 18:06, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
my barn star from my main account says otherwise you weirdo — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aardlion67 ( talk • contribs) 18:14, 22 July 2023 (UTC) you can try to block me as much as you want, I still got my other account regular dumb swedish. Is it cold out there!
Please refrain from threats of blocking before doing your research. You reverted an edit about Shamier Little's PB. It actually stands now (as I entered it) as 49.68s. She ran it in a second-place loss to Natalia Kaczmarek at the Monaco 2023. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GsLuOzk2pDQ&pp=ygUTc2hhbWllciBsaXR0bGUgNDAwbQ%3D%3D
Change it back, or I will. 72.174.131.123 ( talk) 04:58, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Dear Wikipedia Team,
I am writing to request the addition of an external link to a reputable website that I believe would be valuable to Wikipedia readers and users. My website, [1], is a reliable and informative resource related to Short Story
As an enthusiastic contributor and advocate for sharing knowledge, I have noticed that the Wikipedia page on this Short story Wikipedia lacks a link to my website, which I believe could significantly enhance the available information for interested readers. My website provides unique insights, in-depth analysis story making it a valuable complement to the existing content on Wikipedia.
To maintain transparency and uphold the principles of verifiability and neutrality, I would like to clarify that while I am the owner of Englishstory, my primary intention is to offer useful and credible information to the community, rather than promoting any commercial interests. The content on my website adheres to Wikipedia's guidelines, and I believe it could serve as an authoritative source for users seeking additional information.
I kindly request that you consider adding my website as an external link on the Wikipedia page for relevant topic. The inclusion of this link would not only improve the depth of knowledge available to readers but also contribute to a more comprehensive and informative article on [relevant topic].
Please find the relevant details below:
Website Title: Englishstory
Website URL: https://www.englishstory.in/
Brief Description: We provides the story which people love to read and enhance their knowledge
If necessary, I am open to providing any additional information or answering any questions you may have about my website's content, credibility, or intent.
Thank you for your time and consideration. I look forward to the possibility of seeing my website's link included on the Wikipedia page and contributing positively to the knowledge-sharing ecosystem of Wikipedia.
Sincerely,
Bishnupriya Bishnupriya9861 ( talk) 11:32, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
The redirect Poor country has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 September 22 § Poor country until a consensus is reached. Crashed greek ( talk) 04:01, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
My apologies. I accidentally reported that attack username under 'your username. Ignore the ping, it's already fixed. Meters ( talk) 05:37, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
Hello, Sjo. Do you speak Russian or Ukrainian? If not, why did you revert my edit on Yunarmiya page? The sentence misrepresented the article. F.Alexsandr ( talk) 16:21, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
Hello, Sjo. I understand you may think my edit to the Taylor Guitar page was unconstructive, but I do not agree. Please stop being annoying. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.132.163.34 ( talk) 14:44, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
Hey Sjo! I'm not sure if you remember me, I made some edits the other day on some american gun law pages, mostly editing out "assault weapon" and replacing it with "semi-automatic weapon". I have since learned a little more about the process for contributing to wikipedia, and I wanted to apologize for just jumping on and making edits without any backgeound work. I am genuinely concerned about the language used from a technical and politically accurate sense, as "assault weapon" is generally a politically charged term that isn't historically used in that way. Breaching tools like shotguns would fall more into that category if anything. Would you have any advice for how I can contribute to this, or better contribute to discussion on whether or not to make these alterations? 2601:444:382:FC20:7E3C:FB95:C3C6:4D2C ( talk) 05:35, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 00:22, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
The article Diamyd Medical has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Insufficiently notable
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Bon courage (
talk) 09:20, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
On what basis did you claim that my edits were socialistic perspectives? And explain why my edits were not suitable for lede, when it is just introducing the concept of ownership as the article should in its opening. Adityaverma8998 ( talk) 06:29, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Thanks for catching that. Glad to see you've seen the article, which doesn't show any signs of notability as the sources only have one line mentions. What do you think? I've warned the editor about falsely labelling edits as fixing typos. Doug Weller talk 13:34, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
I think you were correct there, I tried using ctrl+F to look for "welfare chauvinism", but none. Maybe from the text to the left beside template of information where it mentions it is a welfare chauvinist party. 75.113.159.27 ( talk) 12:29, 24 March 2024 (UTC)