Now there's IP hopping on a /20 range with attempts at recreating a subject that cannot be verified with internet sources. Attempts have also been moved and subsequently deleted at subject space and draftspace as well.
Jalen Folf(talk) 17:18, 1 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – BLP violations and general vandalism from a few IPs. -- LuK3(Talk) 21:50, 1 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. They are socks of the Louisville Loon, necessitating a long period of semi-protection.
Favonian (
talk) 21:55, 1 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Thanks for the Special Contributions links.
— Maile (
talk) 18:30, 1 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Texas A&M football team recently got demolished by LSU, so a lot of IP vandalism involving LSU. For example, the president of A&M was vandalized to be the LSU QB.
Bait30 Talk? 18:08, 1 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Malcolmxl5 (
talk) 18:20, 1 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – Looks like dynamic IP misgendering against sources one of the characters.
Geraldo Perez (
talk) 22:30, 30 November 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Malcolmxl5 (
talk) 17:03, 1 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary extended confirmed:BLP policy violations – Immediate resumption of BIO policy violation after previous protection.
Escape Orbit(Talk) 16:06, 1 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks , after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Recent violations has been by an non-autoconfirmed account.
Malcolmxl5 (
talk) 16:51, 1 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Persistent block evasion across multiple IP ranges, even after two past expired semi-protections (longest of 1 week) and during the current year-long PC protection. No PC activity besides block evasion. — MarkH21talk 17:47, 1 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Malcolmxl5 (
talk) 17:53, 1 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Persistent repeated removal of (well-sourced) supposedly "malicious" content by multiple IPs and an account two accounts; report has been made at
WP:SPI as well. Possibly semi-protection necessary until end of UK election campaign (12 December).
YorkshireLad (
talk) 13:30, 1 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 14:07, 1 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Malcolmxl5 (
talk) 13:39, 1 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Malcolmxl5 (
talk) 13:27, 1 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Malcolmxl5 (
talk) 13:23, 1 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Malcolmxl5 (
talk) 13:37, 1 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 08:35, 1 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Watford sacked their manager, now there is disruptive editors.
Govvy (
talk) 13:11, 1 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Malcolmxl5 (
talk) 13:14, 1 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Pretty much all edits done to this page are vandalism caused by IPs. The pending change lock appears to be futile unfortunately. . INeed
Support:V 23:31, 30 November 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. –
Muboshgu (
talk) 02:33, 1 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of
unsourced or poorly sourced content – Disruptive IP swapping user been at this for months on many of the Doors related articles especially the addition of unsourced personal sections. . Robvanvee 19:58, 30 November 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. –
Muboshgu (
talk) 02:08, 1 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 00:47, 1 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Persistent recreation of article which was deleted (redirected) as the result of an AfD discussion.
Onel5969TT me 12:30, 30 November 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – LTA IPs attacking after previous 3 year protection expired. -- LuK3(Talk) 23:42, 30 November 2019 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 23:47, 30 November 2019 (UTC)reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Birthday keeps getting updated to two years younger than she actually is. Someone keeps updating the birthday to 3/7/2004 instead of 3/7/2006.
MiloArcher (
talk) 18:18, 30 November 2019 (UTC)reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
El_C 19:15, 30 November 2019 (UTC)reply
Hi
CLCStudent, thank you very much for the report. I may have been able to resolve this without protection, but we'll need to have a look later if that was successful. Please have a look at the edit history again, and at the bottom of the talk page.
~ ToBeFree (
talk) 20:36, 30 November 2019 (UTC)reply
Well, that has changed quickly. I'm now involved, but I support protection.
~ ToBeFree (
talk) 20:37, 30 November 2019 (UTC)reply
Move protection: Highly-visible / high-profile page without move protection. Was recently subjected to page-move vandalism. Really no reason for this page to be moved without significant discussion.
Master of Time(talk) 22:48, 30 November 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent
disruptive editing – Persistent addition of unsourced content, or change of sourced content in the lead and the infobox. Edit warring by IPs and newly registered editors.
Austronesier (
talk) 13:23, 1 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Automated comment:@
Gleeanon409: This request cannot be parsed. Please ensure it follows formatting consistent with the current or previous methods of submission.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 21:41, 1 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Please enable the pending changes need to be approved feature.
Gleeanon409 (
talk) 02:56, 2 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection.
Lectonar (
talk) 07:47, 2 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 20:38, 2 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 20:38, 2 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Already protected by administrator Widr.
Malcolmxl5 (
talk) 20:56, 2 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive changes to whatever nationality suits the IP or user . CoolMarc 15:48, 2 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Pending changes protection not enough.
Brojam (
talk) 07:49, 2 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. - there have been quieter patches even when non-SPed, so I've not opted for indef at this point, but clearly rate speed of vandalism is too high for easy PC. I have retained indefinite PC, as I suspect in a year's time there will still be some, though the rate may change enough to make PC viable
Nosebagbear (
talk) 13:20, 2 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – For some reason this keeps attracting a fair amount of nonsense edit requests and no legitimate ones. Asking for a second opinion, though, especially as the file article itself is semi protected.
Jo-Jo Eumerus (
talk) 13:47, 2 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Done I see no legitimate edit requests and it seems to me, given file talk pages are rarely edited, semi-protection is a proportionate response to the disruption being caused here by non-autoconfirmed editors.
Malcolmxl5 (
talk) 14:27, 2 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Upload-warring going on here. — Vaibhavafro💬 12:36, 1 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Already protected.
Lectonar (
talk) 07:20, 2 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Automated comment:@
Lectonar: One or more pages in this request have not been protected.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 07:30, 2 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Upload protected it is....
Lectonar (
talk) 07:37, 2 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Requesting immediate archiving...Lectonar (
talk) 13:56, 2 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – POV editing by IP adding unsourced OR and poorly sourced material.
Dr.K. 06:20, 2 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk) 13:09, 2 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – There's a lot of vandalism from IP address users on this page, so I think it might need some level of permanent protection. Temporary protection has been applied many times in the past, but to seemingly no long-term effect. Thanks in advance!. —
Bsoykatalk 19:09, 1 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Declined –
Warn the user appropriately then report them to
AIV or
ANI if they continue. Last protection ended in 2018; disruption is few and rather far between.
Lectonar (
talk) 07:52, 2 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Use the talk-page to form a
consensusLectonar (
talk) 11:26, 2 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Ongoing, perpetually nonstop POV pushing and edit warring. A problematic editor was recently indefinitely blocked, but has resorted to continuing their behavior - over a year going and counting - through IP addresses. DÅRTHBØTTØ (
T•
C) 11:12, 2 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – persistent vandalism and disruptive editing from rival club fans and IPs.
Coderzombie (
talk) 12:25, 1 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Lectonar (
talk) 07:19, 2 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – Basically new and anonymous editors confusing her stage name and legal name and how article should describe that. Covered in talk page and article itself. Was protected before for this but continues.
Geraldo Perez (
talk) 19:34, 30 November 2019 (UTC)reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. Last edit 19:26, 30 November 2019.
Malcolmxl5 (
talk) 06:16, 2 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary pending changes: Weird mix of constructive edits and vandalism over the past several days. –
UnnamedUser(open talk page) 02:08, 1 December 2019 (UTC)reply
I was going to file this report as well. Edits like
this are decently concerning.
–MJL‐Talk‐☖ 02:29, 1 December 2019 (UTC)reply
I have found that there is a recurring issue on the use of pronouns in this article. Multiple IP editors are repeatedly changing the pronouns to create this mess. There's currently a talk page discussion about which pronouns to use. –
UnnamedUser(open talk page) 04:36, 1 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Please enable the pending changes need to be approved feature.
Gleeanon409 (
talk) 02:54, 2 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. Last IP/non-autoconfirmed edit was 07:07, 1 December 2019.
Malcolmxl5 (
talk) 06:25, 2 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Mutliple IP's keep changing that he is not on the Ole Miss Rebels. They keep unsourcing the information.
TheBigMan720 (
talk) 01:52, 2 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 02:28, 2 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Already protected.
Lectonar (
talk) 07:53, 2 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Automated comment:@
Lectonar: One or more pages in this request have not been protected.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 08:16, 2 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Was protected in the meantime, protection expired after 3 hours.
Lectonar (
talk) 08:33, 2 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Persistent vandalism from multiple IPs adding that this actress is currently a fugitive from the law.
Vega19 (
talk) 04:41, 2 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Nosebagbear (
talk) 08:43, 2 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Normally I wouldn't protect an article which is at AfD, but this is steering towards a keep anyways.
Lectonar (
talk) 07:46, 2 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Lane Kiffin is a candidate for Arkansas, Missouri, and Ole Miss, and should be protected to prevent vandalism on his current title.
Lsw2472 (
talk) 07:43, 2 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk) 08:36, 2 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Persistent vandalism (addition of un-sourced information, deletion of duly sourced/referenced ones), disrespect towards editors, calling users and contributors names as well as hurling baseless accusations on editors and their contributions, as can be seen
here,
here,
here,
here,
here,
here,
here,
here,
here, and
here —these are just a sample of the most recent
vandalism activities on said article, and attack/baseless accusations on editors/contributors.
Migsmigss (
talk) 17:09, 1 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 04:29, 2 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Already protected by administrator K6ka.
Malcolmxl5 (
talk) 06:10, 2 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. No other edits since October.
— Maile (
talk) 02:43, 2 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: Persistent disparaging
vandalism – Persistent BLP vandalism from multiple IPs, subject is a transgender student athlete ☆
Bri (
talk) 04:55, 2 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 05:15, 2 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of
unsourced or poorly sourced content – Ongoing addition of unsourced information by disruptive IP targeting the Doors articles . Robvanvee 10:58, 1 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 22:26, 1 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism; just about every recent IP edit has been vandalism or abusive language of some kind.--♦IanMacM♦(talk to me) 19:53, 1 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 48 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -
ianmacm - 18 edits by 13 users and no substantive changes made over nearly 2 months, so definitely disruption going on. Temporary protection for now (48 hours), but if this continues please report again for a longer semi-protection.
EvergreenFir(talk) 01:51, 2 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – repeat of disruptive editing where IP editors are removing archive URLs from references.
Joeyconnick (
talk) 20:03, 1 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 48 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
EvergreenFir(talk) 01:45, 2 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. But still good advice to request an edit filter for the long haul.
— Maile (
talk) 00:55, 2 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Removal of sourced content from both IP and new editors. . -- LuK3(Talk) 22:23, 1 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
EvergreenFir(talk) 01:41, 2 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – by IPs and new users, hours after previous protection expired.
theinstantmatrix (
talk) 19:41, 3 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Already protected by administrator Kinu . -- Deepfriedokra 19:53, 3 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary pending changes: Persistent
disruptive editing – Multiple IPs and now a new user has been trying to use this page to advertise tour guides.
TheEpTic (
talk) 22:06, 3 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra 22:13, 3 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last
8 days.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 13:44, 3 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – A continuing stream of test edits/confused editors.
John of Reading (
talk) 16:00, 3 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism. - An anonymous user keeps adding bogus information concerning the store's scanners. Their IP changes allowing them to vandalize the page getting off with a minor warning.
I asked the page to be protected back in September 2019. The page was protected for a month, after it became unprotected, the anonymous IP user was reverted 9 times. I would like the article to be indefinitely semi-protected as the vandalism has continued unabated. Thank you.
FunksBrother (
talk) 17:37, 3 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Ongoing DE re speculation surrounding new head coach.
UW Dawgs (
talk) 14:30, 3 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 15:00, 3 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – There appears to be one editor with several IPs (judging by the similar tone and phrasing of their edit summaries) consistently deleting cited content from the article. The make vague allegations of fact suppression or "wrong facts" but do not offer any alternate sources or explanations of what's specifically wrong. I've made several attempts on their talk page and my edit summaries to direct them to the talk page of the article, but they have not been willing to engage in discussion. I'd like to keep improving the article, but my edits and references are consistently reverted without sufficient explanation.
Skeletor3000 (
talk) 16:17, 3 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
— Maile (
talk) 16:42, 3 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Unprotection: Please unprotect this page as protection no longer necessary.
Admin Fæ cannot be contacted due to locked user talk page. --
78.8.42.124 (
talk) 03:09, 3 December 2019 (UTC)reply
@
Fæ:: to be honest, I would be loath to unprotect that particular page. And a little more elaboration of why it should be unprotected would be helpful; there is always the possibilty of edit-requests on the talk-page.
Lectonar (
talk) 06:51, 3 December 2019 (UTC)reply
It may be that what is being referenced is that my user page talk was semi-protected, so someone using an anon IP cannot quiz me there. Though I protected it in 2011 probably from RFPP, I have no strong views about the article
sock today, though as I am no longer an admin it's not my call. --
Fæ (
talk) 07:57, 3 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Note: I can only imagine how strong a vandal magnet that title would be. How about reducing to pending changes and seeing? -- Deepfriedokra 11:30, 3 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Declined I'll decline this one; title alone is too strong a temptation for vandasocking. Also, confirmed by the fact that there were not many edit requests, not a dire need to unprotect. If necessary edits need to be made, IPs can go via edit-requests, as has happened before.
Lectonar (
talk) 13:31, 3 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Ongoing DE re speculation surrounding new head coach.
UW Dawgs (
talk) 14:30, 3 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 15:00, 3 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – There appears to be one editor with several IPs (judging by the similar tone and phrasing of their edit summaries) consistently deleting cited content from the article. The make vague allegations of fact suppression or "wrong facts" but do not offer any alternate sources or explanations of what's specifically wrong. I've made several attempts on their talk page and my edit summaries to direct them to the talk page of the article, but they have not been willing to engage in discussion. I'd like to keep improving the article, but my edits and references are consistently reverted without sufficient explanation.
Skeletor3000 (
talk) 16:17, 3 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
— Maile (
talk) 16:42, 3 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Unprotection: Please unprotect this page as protection no longer necessary.
Admin Fæ cannot be contacted due to locked user talk page. --
78.8.42.124 (
talk) 03:09, 3 December 2019 (UTC)reply
@
Fæ:: to be honest, I would be loath to unprotect that particular page. And a little more elaboration of why it should be unprotected would be helpful; there is always the possibilty of edit-requests on the talk-page.
Lectonar (
talk) 06:51, 3 December 2019 (UTC)reply
It may be that what is being referenced is that my user page talk was semi-protected, so someone using an anon IP cannot quiz me there. Though I protected it in 2011 probably from RFPP, I have no strong views about the article
sock today, though as I am no longer an admin it's not my call. --
Fæ (
talk) 07:57, 3 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Note: I can only imagine how strong a vandal magnet that title would be. How about reducing to pending changes and seeing? -- Deepfriedokra 11:30, 3 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Declined I'll decline this one; title alone is too strong a temptation for vandasocking. Also, confirmed by the fact that there were not many edit requests, not a dire need to unprotect. If necessary edits need to be made, IPs can go via edit-requests, as has happened before.
Lectonar (
talk) 13:31, 3 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Ongoing DE re speculation surrounding new head coach.
UW Dawgs (
talk) 14:30, 3 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 15:00, 3 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – There appears to be one editor with several IPs (judging by the similar tone and phrasing of their edit summaries) consistently deleting cited content from the article. The make vague allegations of fact suppression or "wrong facts" but do not offer any alternate sources or explanations of what's specifically wrong. I've made several attempts on their talk page and my edit summaries to direct them to the talk page of the article, but they have not been willing to engage in discussion. I'd like to keep improving the article, but my edits and references are consistently reverted without sufficient explanation.
Skeletor3000 (
talk) 16:17, 3 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
— Maile (
talk) 16:42, 3 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Unprotection: Please unprotect this page as protection no longer necessary.
Admin Fæ cannot be contacted due to locked user talk page. --
78.8.42.124 (
talk) 03:09, 3 December 2019 (UTC)reply
@
Fæ:: to be honest, I would be loath to unprotect that particular page. And a little more elaboration of why it should be unprotected would be helpful; there is always the possibilty of edit-requests on the talk-page.
Lectonar (
talk) 06:51, 3 December 2019 (UTC)reply
It may be that what is being referenced is that my user page talk was semi-protected, so someone using an anon IP cannot quiz me there. Though I protected it in 2011 probably from RFPP, I have no strong views about the article
sock today, though as I am no longer an admin it's not my call. --
Fæ (
talk) 07:57, 3 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Note: I can only imagine how strong a vandal magnet that title would be. How about reducing to pending changes and seeing? -- Deepfriedokra 11:30, 3 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Declined I'll decline this one; title alone is too strong a temptation for vandasocking. Also, confirmed by the fact that there were not many edit requests, not a dire need to unprotect. If necessary edits need to be made, IPs can go via edit-requests, as has happened before.
Lectonar (
talk) 13:31, 3 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – At least 2 weeks or something until the AfD ends. The IP has been vandalizing the page twice
[1][2].
Jovanmilic97 (
talk) 12:26, 3 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent
Vandalism and reversion of sourced content. Heavy IP vandalism after the page got unprotected a while back.
Luigitehplumber (
talk) 13:38, 3 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent
disruptive editing – IPs changing ethnicity from "Kannadiga" to "Tulu" despite the subject herself explained that she is a Kannadiga in an interview. Sourced reference in the article
[3] . .
Fylindfotberserk (
talk) 14:25, 3 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Would you care to elaborate why it needs to be unprotected?
Lectonar (
talk) 07:08, 3 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Note: As with sock, this has ben protected for years. But this is a BLP. There have been no edit requests. So more info would be helpful. Perhaps pending changes and see how it goes. -- Deepfriedokra 11:34, 3 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Done Downgraded to pending-changes and watchlisted.
Lectonar (
talk) 13:33, 3 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Multiple users are targeting this article and placing either phone numbers or in game identifiers into article to "drum up stats".
Mr Xaero☎️ 12:15, 3 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk) 12:32, 3 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Vandalism and other disruptive editing of this page has resumed immediately following the expiry of the previous period of semi-protection; may I suggest a few days or a week this time?.
Wham2001 (
talk) 13:10, 3 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk) 13:14, 3 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Edit-warring between several users over the article's format.
Areaseven (
talk) 09:45, 2 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. Semi-protection has handled the acute situation, and the autoconfirmed disputants are now discussing on the talk page.
MelanieN (
talk) 23:11, 2 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection The future article of this one need semi-protection to avoid unintentional disruptive edits.
ACQ322Acuity (
answer me) 04:19, 3 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing/vandalism by multiple IP-hopping users.
DerbyCountyinNZ(
TalkContribs) 04:03, 3 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of another year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk) 06:56, 3 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Random IP addresses keep removing
Jill Hennessy as an actress listed for no apparent reason.
TheBigMan720 (
talk) 06:02, 3 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – tagging unnecessary deletion tag again & again and adding unsourced content. Owlf 18:25, 2 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
MelanieN (
talk) 00:14, 3 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Repeated inclusions of the words "*FALSE STORY*" (and similar) due to a meme circulating that compares McDowell's crimes/sentence with that of Felicity Huffman. The meme is misleading, but not "false". And vandalism is vandalism, regardless.
wbm (
talk) 18:26, 2 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. At this point it's only been vandalized once.,
MelanieN (
talk) 00:17, 3 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – A potential candidate at many schools, will be getting more vandalism than it already is.
Lsw2472 (
talk) 01:49, 3 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
MelanieN (
talk) 02:01, 3 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Persistent vandalism and adding of unnecessary content. Edits like
this and
this in only the past two/three days.
heyitsben!!talk 17:07, 2 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
MelanieN (
talk) 23:39, 2 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Unprotection: Please unprotect this page as protection no longer necessary. Protecting admin has not edited since 2010.
Steel1943 (
talk) 20:58, 2 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Unprotected –
bradv🍁 02:45, 3 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Reduction in protection level: This article has been protected indefinitely so only administrators can create it. [Create=Require administrator access] (indefinite) Since the admin who deleted and salted the article is inactive since May, I am listing my request here. I think the article satisfies
WP:NCORP and I have added the references in the
draft version of the article.
Beastranger (
talk) 00:36, 3 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Unprotected. It's up to you whether you want to go through
AFC for a second opinion before publishing this, but a quick Google search tells me this company is probably more
notable than it was at the last AfD. –
bradv🍁 02:42, 3 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Longterm semi-protection:Persistent vandalism by an IP-hopping vandal constantly trying to create a hoax about a fake Netflix series. Virtually all IP edits to the article since July are of this hoax vandal's doings.--
Mr Fink (
talk) 01:33, 3 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk) 01:57, 3 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – There have been multiple instances of vandalism on this article today and yesterday.
The Eloquent Peasant (
talk) 01:43, 3 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk) 01:59, 3 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – IP's keep erroneously changing the article to label the storm as the same one as Matmo, which is not the prevailing consensus or the official view of the Regional Specialized Meteorological Center.
Jasper Deng(talk) 19:42, 1 December 2019 (UTC)reply
I am involved in this dispute, but to me it looks more like a content dispute rather than a vandal one.
Jo-Jo Eumerus (
talk) 13:49, 2 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Note: Noting that the last IP edits were 1 December 2019; before that, 29 November 2019; before that, 25 November 2019; before that, 23 November 2019. That’s not a lot of activity and it seems to have been adequately handled by straightforward reverts. And, yes, a content dispute rather than vandalism.
Malcolmxl5 (
talk) 18:14, 2 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
MelanieN (
talk) 22:52, 2 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Pending changes: Persistent
vandalism – Persistent vandalism over the last few months, specifically pointed at the "Comparison" section of the article. See page history. There is consensus on the article talk page to keep the section as is. Belinrahs|talk ⁄ edits 01:03, 3 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Persistent IP vandalism over the past couple of days.
Hirolovesswords (
talk) 01:17, 3 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk) 01:53, 3 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 23:10, 2 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – See edit filter, long-term abuse IP disruption. -- LuK3(Talk) 21:12, 2 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 22:24, 2 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Already protected by administrator El C.
MelanieN (
talk) 01:26, 3 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Looking at other requests perhaps I should have asked for temporary semi-protection. It is my first time of asking.
SovalValtos (
talk) 22:02, 2 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 22:24, 2 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
sockpuppetry – Repeated vandalism by sock-hopping anonymous editor. livelikemusictalk! 20:15, 2 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last
8 days.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 20:23, 2 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk) 00:27, 3 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last
8 days.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 00:40, 3 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last
8 days.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 00:40, 3 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Pending changes: Persistent
vandalism – Every IP edit on this page since September 26 has been vandalism. –
UnnamedUser(open talk page) 19:51, 2 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Fully protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. This is a matter of edit warring among autoconfirmed users.
MelanieN (
talk) 23:33, 2 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – IP range bloating voice cast with unneeded info, including bluelinking common terms and adding POV detail.
DonIago (
talk) 01:56, 2 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk) 22:59, 2 December 2019 (UTC)reply
I wouldn't say vandalism, but since the company announced a new CEO yesterday, well-intentioned IP editors have been replacing the name of the former CEO (who is also a founder) with the name of the new CEO, even in inappropriate places (like where it lists founders). The article has already been updated with the new CEO's name, so semi-protection would help keep the article stable and cut down on the time spent by other editors reverting these well-intentioned but unhelpful IP edits. Thanks in advance. –
Levivich 16:27, 4 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk) 22:44, 4 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Testifying in front of Congress at the moment. Please semi-protect for 24 hours. --
bender235 (
talk) 16:57, 4 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk) 22:55, 4 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Disruptive IP editing without talk page consensus. .
Zefr (
talk) 21:09, 4 December 2019 (UTC)reply
I am the one editing the page, we already have the discussions in the talk page the above mentioned user is not interested to participate in discussions and trying to add duplicate entries and irrelevant statements with false references. Need help in interpreting the references
90.185.50.46 (
talk) 21:28, 4 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Lots of IP vandalism on featured article today. Please semi-protect.
Dicklyon (
talk) 17:59, 4 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
— Maile (
talk) 19:24, 4 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Lots of IP vandalism on featured article today. Please semi-protect.
Dicklyon (
talk) 17:59, 4 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
— Maile (
talk) 19:24, 4 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 18:57, 4 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – This page has been semi-protected for three days, immediately on coming out of protection same IP:180.150.112.14 (who also operates from other IP's) is making same unsourced and poorly written additions.
David J Johnson (
talk) 11:17, 4 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk) 11:25, 4 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Reduction in protection level: The article has been semi-protected since 2012. I don't know of any reason why vandalism would be likely to become heavy and persistent. The protecting administrator does not appear to be active anymore.
142.160.131.220 (
talk) 04:55, 4 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Unprotected If issues reoccur protection will be restored very quickly. Fish+
Karate 12:41, 4 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – IP user remove the article's wording in an unauthorized way
. -Nahal(T) 10:32, 4 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra 10:38, 4 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Definite semi-protection: The article is currently indefinitely semi-protected. Requesting an expiration date be set. The article was protected
12 years ago. The editor who originally set the protection has not been active for the past 2 weeks. Regards, Spintendo 11:16, 2 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 11:17, 2 December 2019 (UTC)reply
@
NawlinWiki:: still active as far as Wikipedia goes, they can handle that.
Lectonar (
talk) 11:35, 2 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Note: As the purpose is to prevent disruption, spam, etc , and as that seems to be working, not eager to make any changes. Once again, pending changes and see what happens might be a reasonable course. -- Deepfriedokra 11:40, 3 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Many attempts in the past few days to add irrelevant statements as well as unfunny and childish insults. Evidence of coordination behinds these attempts available on the TSLAQ Talk Page. Thank you.
QRep2020 (
talk) 06:08, 4 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk) 07:42, 4 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Continuous removal of sourced content and violation of
WP:NPOV by a series of IPs, probably fans of Benjamin's. The subject has encouraged his followers to change this article and we have a constant stream of them.
The Mirror Cracked (
talk) 03:03, 4 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk) 03:33, 4 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Continuous removal of sourced content and violation of
WP:NPOV by a series of IPs, probably fans of Benjamin's. The subject has encouraged his followers to change this article and we have a constant stream of them.
The Mirror Cracked (
talk) 03:03, 4 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk) 03:33, 4 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – IP vandalism over the past couple of days - repeatedly adding a NN "noticable" person.
Dorsetonian (
talk) 17:17, 5 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra 17:49, 5 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Repeated disruptive editing. We could use some help with protection.
Indigenous girl (
talk) 15:47, 5 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 16:17, 5 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
— Maile (
talk) 16:32, 5 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent
disruptive editing – Low volume but persistent disruptive edits of changing the event name and venues.
CASSIOPEIA(
talk) 15:55, 5 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra 17:48, 5 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Article is being protected for the first time.
Malcolmxl5 (
talk) 11:57, 5 December 2019 (UTC)reply
User(s)
blocked. One IPv6 /64 blocked by JJMC89 for three months.
Malcolmxl5 (
talk) 11:59, 5 December 2019 (UTC)reply
User(s)
blocked. IP4 /20 school block for one year also applied.
Malcolmxl5 (
talk) 12:10, 5 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. Pending changes protection is doing its job.
Malcolmxl5 (
talk) 12:16, 5 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Indefinite semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism – The article has suffered a series of vandalism in recent days which the IPs continue to reintegrate the occupation of Bad Bunny in his infobox and the introduction of the page without indicating news references if he is a rapper or not but insists on keeping it as it was before I removed it.
148.0.107.176 (
talk) 06:03, 5 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra 12:50, 5 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra 12:17, 4 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Note: Have to remember role separation here vs real life. Not my job to recommend someone seek help for their behavioral issues. sheesh. -- Deepfriedokra 12:17, 4 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Requesting immediate archiving...Malcolmxl5 (
talk) 11:48, 5 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra 15:18, 4 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Note: Looks like little collateral risk. I don't want someone years from now questioning my sanity 'cause no one will remember why I SP'd indefinitely. -- Deepfriedokra 15:18, 4 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Requesting immediate archiving...Malcolmxl5 (
talk) 11:49, 5 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Declined@
Tolly4bolly: Sorry but it is necessary to verify the DoB. I looked at the two references and cannot see it. The first ref is a
WP:PRIMARYSOURCE and would not be satisfactory even if it has the date somewhere. If the date is verified, please fix the refence and put an explanation on article talk. Link to that in when next reverting. It it's not verified, remove the date.
Johnuniq (
talk) 06:17, 5 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Thank you, will start a discussion on talk page.
Tolly4bolly 06:31, 5 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – Same IP user returned to do the same edits after previous protection period ended. They just will not quit. –
WPA (
talk) 18:04, 4 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Declined@
WikiPediaAid: An admin can't see why the IP's edits are bad. Please put a brief explanation about the date on the article talk page and link to it in when next reverting.
Johnuniq (
talk) 06:05, 5 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary full protection: Persistent disruptive editing by
anonymous editor in violation of
this rule, conduct of user reported to
WP:ANI due to user's disruptive editing. --
Jgstokes (
talk) 03:10, 5 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Shortly after protection ended, IPs have started vandalizing it again.
UnnamedUser (
talk) 23:46, 4 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Johnuniq (
talk) 06:23, 5 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary protection: Low volumn but persistent adding unsourced event name as it has yet to be shown on UFC.com web site for the last 3 days
CASSIOPEIA(
talk) 02:00, 5 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Johnuniq (
talk) 06:24, 5 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Declined – No IP edits since 21 Nov., and they are not all bad. Report again if you see a continuing problem.
EdJohnston (
talk) 03:22, 5 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Constant vandalism that doesn't get reverted quickly. All by IP's.
Madbrad200 (
talk) 18:07, 4 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Johnuniq (
talk) 06:06, 5 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: Persistent IP Vandalism. IP Addresses adding incorrect TV Shows, changing the years so that the years are wrong.
TheBlackKitty (
talk) 19:19, 4 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Johnuniq (
talk) 06:08, 5 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last
8 days.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 21:30, 4 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Johnuniq (
talk) 06:09, 5 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – There are users who have been abusing this wikipedia page with the incorrect information.
DragoMynaa (
talk) 02:07, 5 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Repeated attempts by IPs to include random names.
Zappa⚡Matic 04:09, 5 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. 2 months, 18 edits mostly recent, no constructive changes.
EvergreenFir(talk) 06:03, 5 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 05:29, 5 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 48 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
EvergreenFir(talk) 06:05, 5 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 23:18, 4 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary full protection: Persistent
vandalism – Because of some users who distort facts with political propagandas.
Hashima20 (
talk) 21:49, 4 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Declined. Request is too vague. Page is currently on ITN, so would rather not.
El_C 22:47, 4 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – no idea what's going on here but there has been an excess of vandalism and nonsense all day.
Praxidicae (
talk) 19:23, 6 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 19:58, 6 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Vandalism by multiple accounts since last protection removed, especially in the last few days.
MB 20:31, 6 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 22:29, 6 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: IPs are disrupting this page – a few days ago, one thought it was funny to mass revert everyone's edits. Now there is an IP-hopping user changing contentious content without a source.
UnnamedUser (
talk) 21:22, 6 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Malcolmxl5 (
talk) 22:11, 6 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Permanent Semi-protection. there aren't many good reasons for someone to be editing old AFD discussions, but a persistent IP keeps doing so, blanking the discussion or re-inserting the text of their deleted article into the AFD.
Page blanked. Blanked
again. Small
narrative added. Article content
inserted. And so on. This has been going on since September.
ThatMontrealIP (
talk) 14:32, 6 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Automated comment:@
ThatMontrealIP: This request cannot be parsed. Please ensure it follows formatting consistent with the current or previous methods of submission.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 14:40, 6 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fixed, and pending changes protected, and watchlisted to boot.
Lectonar (
talk) 14:55, 6 December 2019 (UTC)reply
thanks! Out of curiosity, why not just disable user editing forever? It seems like a waste of time to potentially have to go back and correct a vandal's work. The discussion is closed, and shouldn't ever be edited.
ThatMontrealIP (
talk) 15:27, 6 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Disruption was not really big enough, and because one never knows what might happen. Wikipedia pages should normally only be protected as a last resort, and, if at all, the protection should be kept to a minimum. One of our 5 pillars: the encyclopedia that everyone can edit.... and I am
old-fashioned to boot, so I try to be accomodating and polite even to vandals/people who disrupt Wikipedia. But if you're interested, you can try and propose semi-protection for all closed AfD's at the appropriate village pump. I cannot remember if this ever came up.
Lectonar (
talk) 15:40, 6 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Thanks. it's a closed discussion and as far as I can see it's a waste of time to have editors watching it. Five pillars is not really relevant for closed discussions. I wasn't proposing closing them all, just this one. 16:26, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – No real reason to edit this page anyway. Could be a candidate for permanent protection.
Skeletor3000 (
talk) 19:37, 6 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: IP and SPA activity around coaching rumors.
UW Dawgs (
talk) 20:09, 5 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Declined the first one, Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. the second one.
Lectonar (
talk) 07:57, 6 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Automated comment:@
Lectonar: One or more pages in this request have not been protected.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 08:08, 6 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of
dispute resolution. And even extended-confirmed wouldn't be effective, as most involved are long-standing users.
Lectonar (
talk) 08:05, 6 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Lectonar, that issue has been indeed solved but removal of content by Newbies and AC users are issue here. Harshil want to talk? 11:13, 6 December 2019 (UTC)reply
@
Harshil169: There were exactly two instances of disruption of that kind since November 15th; I can but repeat what I wrote in October on your talk: please read our
protection policy, and thoroughly.
Lectonar (
talk) 11:26, 6 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Comment:(Non-administrator comment) I am watching this page and I don't support a protection. The disruption is very low as compared to constructive edits. the topic is in the news. --DBigXrayᗙ 10:57, 6 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Declined Indeed, a well watched article with not too much disruption....and vandalism as per our definition I really do not see at all. If this picks up, jsut relist here please.
Lectonar (
talk) 11:10, 6 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Vandals are adding curse words.
Econhero5 (
talk) 05:27, 6 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. Last IP edits were on 29 October.
Malcolmxl5 (
talk) 08:15, 6 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: Edits, most of them vandalism, by IP editors have been frequently reverted one year after protection ended.
George Ho (
talk) 06:16, 6 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Lectonar (
talk) 08:12, 6 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Persistent vandalism by various IP users who insist that Disney, not Fox, should be credited as distributor.
Areaseven (
talk) 10:11, 6 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fish+
Karate 10:15, 6 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of
unsourced or poorly sourced content – Large number of unsourced birthdate changes + unsourced negative BLP content, also vandalism.
creffett (
talk) 01:03, 6 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last
8 days.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 01:05, 6 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Checked the previous RfPP, disruptive activity has continued since then so I stand by my request. (Actually, I'll remove the birthdate while I'm at it - it's poorly sourced and apparently the subject of controversy).
creffett (
talk) 01:24, 6 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fish+
Karate 10:00, 6 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: High level of vandalism from new users and IPs after previous block wore off. Requesting infininate protectionN0nsensical.system(
err0r?) 09:19, 6 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Indefinite protection would be excessive, article had been unprotected for 8 years and only had a 1-week protection period that just elapsed. In a month everyone will have seen the new film and will have calmed down. Fish+
Karate 09:52, 6 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of
unsourced or poorly sourced content – Leach has been rumored as a potential candidate for several open head coaching jobs and several IP editors have endeavored to prematurely update the article.
Lepricavark (
talk) 05:01, 6 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk) 08:30, 6 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Malcolmxl5 (
talk) 07:17, 6 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Unprotection: Intended to move template to
Template:Doctor Who image to make the name clearer per the series title and conform with
Category:Doctor Who images; unsure on why the template is move protected (and has been since 2012) as there was no issues concerning moving the template. -- /
Alex/
21 06:35, 4 December 2019 (UTC)reply
@
AGK:: the protecting admin. At that time, afair, when you protected, the "main" protection dictated the overall protection.
Lectonar (
talk) 07:30, 4 December 2019 (UTC)reply
GIven how relatively inactive the protecting admin is, I don't believe there will be a comment, so unprotection should be able to go ahead. -- /
Alex/
21 14:08, 5 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Done Downgraded move protection to semi.
Lectonar (
talk) 08:02, 6 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: Persistent
conflict-of-interest editing, mainly to the Controversies section and by (i) IPs local to the subject who have performed few or no edits other than to this article or (ii) brand new registered users with similar edit histories to (i). One non-IP COI editor and its associated sock were indeffed in November 2019 but the issues described have been rampant since 2016 and occurred sporadically prior to then. There's a case to be made for indefinite semi-protection.
Damon Killian (
talk) 22:54, 4 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
El_C 05:38, 6 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Permanent semi-protection: This article has had never-ending vandalism for the last few years. Can you please just put long-term protection on it? It's ridiculous to have come here and beg for protection every time the protection ends. The subject is a minor fringe figure whose sole claim to notability is pushing pro-Assad conspiracy theories. The vandalism will not stop any time in the near future.
Snooganssnoogans (
talk) 01:44, 6 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Indefinite or lengthy semi-protection: Last few weeks have seen some suspicious 'sock reverting likely sock' type of activity there. Might as well take their playground away and let established editors deal with any issues. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus|
reply here 03:35, 6 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Full protection: Persistent edit warring since October following the closure of an
RfC, which resulted in a consensus to retain 20th Century Fox (the credited distributor) as the distributor of this film, as opposed to the new parent company Disney. This issue has been discussed, but several registered and IP editors continue to revert this consensus daily. --
Wikipedical (
talk) 21:10, 5 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Independently of this request: Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
El_C 05:29, 6 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Weird, pings did not work. Anyway: Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
El_C 05:23, 6 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Unprotection: I saw improvements to deleted content. The content was
restored against consensus. Why was the article semi-protected?
QuackGuru (
talk) 04:58, 6 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Are you not discussing this with protecting admin already? They already said: I'm happy to unprotect as long as the edit-warring doesn't resume. Why have you filed this request, then?
El_C 05:00, 6 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Did you read my response on my talkpage? I saw an edit war, and "improvement to content" isn't an exemption to 3RR. I've already unprotected, and I believe the edit-warriors's stated concern has been addressed. Acroterion(talk) 05:03, 6 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Unprotected (for the bot).
El_C 05:05, 6 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – persistent & recent vandalism from different IPs. The kiddies must be doing school reports on the American Colonies/George Washington.
Please make the vandalism stop - wearying to constantly deal with. Please give the article autoconfirmed protection for a lengthy period of time - at least 6 months, or a couple years.
Shearonink (
talk) 02:13, 6 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 02:36, 6 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Indefinite extended confirmed: Persistent
vandalism – Re-report; IP vandal.
Mvcg66b3r (
talk) 03:15, 6 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last
8 days.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 03:21, 6 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected – Indef. If you believe there are problems with registered accounts, use the talk page to explain the issues and try to follow
WP:Dispute resolution.
EdJohnston (
talk) 03:26, 6 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Disruptive editing by what appears to be a single editor using an account and multiple IPs.
Paisarepa (
talk) 03:54, 6 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 04:07, 6 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Indefinite pending changes:BLP policy violations –
Subtle vandalism, such as changing her year of birth to a plausible but incorrect year, changing her birthplace to a plausible but incorrect location, etc.. —Mr. Guye (
talk) (
contribs) 18:02, 5 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary pending changes: Persistent
vandalism by IP's; however, there are multiple IP's who are very constructive (see
the page statistics). The season is almost over so protecting to the end of the month would be perfect. Thanks!
Jayab314 22:39, 5 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: Return of IP-hopping
vandalism and block evasion after recent end of previous protection.
ConstructiveIntentions (
talk) 01:21, 6 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
— Maile (
talk) 01:44, 6 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Pending changes: Persistent addition of
unsourced or poorly sourced content – Non-autoconfirmed users are repeatedly adding unsourced, unscientific names for this hypothetical element such as "waluigium" and "Todd". Not all IP edits are bad or concentrated, so semiprotection may not immediately be necessary (though it should be considered as an alternative), but these additions are disruptive and need to be stopped (an HTML comment is not sufficient).
ComplexRational (
talk) 16:56, 7 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Persistent vandalism going back to at least November as a result of his team's current controversy.
Bait30 Talk? 21:26, 6 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Kosack (
talk) 20:02, 7 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of
unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent insertion of unsourced information by an anonymous user using multiple IPs.
Aoi (青い) (
talk) 18:15, 6 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk) 12:59, 7 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Edit warring between two new editors going on daily for two weeks. —
kashmīrīTALK 00:47, 7 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 02:30, 7 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last
8 days.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 12:31, 7 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk) 12:50, 7 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism mostly because the VSCO girl meme is still relevent.
Sincerely, Deauthorized. (
talk) 22:36, 6 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
GABgab 23:48, 6 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: IP vandalism several times today.
HonestManBad (
talk) 17:34, 8 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 19:26, 8 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Repeated addition of nonsense going back a month. Article was protected for a few days but the problem has since resumed.
Dorsetonian (
talk) 19:13, 7 December 2019 (UTC)reply
User(s)
blocked. It seems to be all down to one static IP. I've blocked 186.221.217.92 for 72 hours. Please feel free to alert me on my page if the problem resumes,
Dorsetonian.
Bishonen |
talk 15:05, 8 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Repeated addition of nonsense going back a month. IP (originally
186.221.193.179, now 186.221.217.92) has not engaged in discussion.
Dorsetonian (
talk) 19:15, 7 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Unprotection: Editor is community-banned and there is no cause for page protection. Noticed it while trying to add the {{
Banned user}} template. If the unprotecting administrator could also add the template that would help. The relevant diff is:
Special:Diff/929804429#Indefinite community site-ban for Edgar181. With thanks. --qedk (
t桜c) 09:57, 8 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Declined. No need to modify. Any admin can add any pertinent notices.
El_C 12:30, 8 December 2019 (UTC)reply
@
El C: Why is it protected? Per
WP:UPROT, User pages and subpages may be protected upon a request from the user, as long as a need exists—pages in user space should not be automatically or pre-emptively protected, which was decided by community consensus in a June 2013 RfC. --qedk (
t桜c) 14:03, 8 December 2019 (UTC)reply
@
QEDK: Wikipedia is not a bureaucracy and this is an extraordinary case. I am still not inclined to unprotect the user page for you, sorry.
El_C 15:21, 8 December 2019 (UTC)reply
@
El C: It was protected by the editor themselves who has lost their administrator privileges, correct? They are also banned from editing, correct? Given that the unprotecting administrator cannot decide a role and UPROT has a contrasting policy, you are choosing to not unprotect it, which I do not really care about - what I am asking and what you did not answer is why is it protected in the first place and why are you not inclined to unprotect it. Think of it as me playing the devil's advocate but I fully believe that adminstrators should justify the decisions they make (especially when against policy). --qedk (
t桜c) 15:28, 8 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Taking no action seems like the sensible thing to do. The less editors having access to editing that page, the better, as far as I'm concerned. Of course, another admin may choose to unprotect for procedural reasons, in which case, oh well.
El_C 15:42, 8 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Thanks for clarifying. --qedk (
t桜c) 15:49, 8 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: 6 instances of libellous vandalism by different anonymous users in the last 43 edits over 18 months. Dmhball~enwiki (talk) 22:36, 7 December 2019 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. - The disputed material was forced with an RS and not libelous per se. Just negative allegations. I did not restore the material, but I'd recommend using
WP:BLPN in the future.
EvergreenFir(talk) 07:17, 8 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – IPs and new users adding unsourced and defamatory stuff. See
[4]].
Fylindfotberserk (
talk) 17:32, 7 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Not defamatory but Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. I see 23 edits by 13 editors in 5 days with no constructive change and a recent previous 2-week semi protection
EvergreenFir(talk) 07:45, 8 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Permanent semi-protection: Incessant IP vandalism from Mike Mitchell fans chronically adding his name to the cast unsourced and are now adding a completely unimportant “controversy” that means nothing to the film. I ask for permanent semi protection as this has been going on for months and it’s clear they have no interest in stopping.
Rusted AutoParts 17:46, 7 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected..
Rusted AutoParts, re-report and feel free to ping me if it continues after semi expires.
EvergreenFir(talk) 07:41, 8 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – IP users keep undoing edits
.
DragoMynaa (
talk) 19:04, 7 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Not done for indefinite but Semi-protected for a period of 72 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
EvergreenFir(talk) 07:33, 8 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Recently, the protections on the page were increased, so that edits must be confirmed - this was due to a banned editor utilizing sock puppet IP addresses. They are now being very disruptive and are holding up the productivity of the page with their behavior. DÅRTHBØTTØ (
T•
C) 09:59, 7 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Declined An /19 IPv4 rangeblock has been placed by Berean Hunter. Let’s see if that together with the pending changes protection has an effect.
Malcolmxl5 (
talk) 02:48, 8 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent
disruptive editing – They recently disbanded and there is a constant back and forth over "is an American thrash band" and "was an American thrash band" that has been going on for days especially from unregistered users. . Robvanvee 05:36, 8 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection:BLP policy violations – Large number of different IPs adding unsourced birth date (while removing the edit note requesting a source before a DOB is added). bonadeacontributionstalk 11:06, 7 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Malcolmxl5 (
talk) 02:54, 8 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Seems to have been ongoing since July.
Malcolmxl5 (
talk) 02:44, 8 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – Multiple IPs adding unsourced info. Looks to be a somewhat coordinated effort to add certain fake info to article.
Geraldo Perez (
talk) 18:49, 7 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
— Maile (
talk) 02:30, 8 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – Describing this hero of the people as a terrorist is beyond the pale, even if he is no longer covered under
WP:BLP.
MPS1992 (
talk) 22:21, 7 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Malcolmxl5 (
talk) 02:18, 8 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: Return of IP-hopping
vandalism and block evasion after recent end of previous protection.
ConstructiveIntentions (
talk) 02:26, 8 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
RickinBaltimore (
talk) 02:30, 8 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 12 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
RickinBaltimore (
talk) 01:57, 8 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
RickinBaltimore (
talk) 02:05, 8 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Change to Semi-protection: I think after too long time the extended protection template is no longer needed.
Portbase (
talk) 01:18, 8 December 2019 (UTC)reply
@
El C: Pinging the protecting admin. --
Malcolmxl5 (
talk) 01:31, 8 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Long-term IP vandalism/disruption. -- IP keeps adding Romanian to his nationality. Ancestry is referenced in Personal life section. He is a Canadian poker player, not a dual national represenative.
RedPatchBoys (
talk) 01:37, 7 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. Only two edits by the same user over the space of three days. If the user continues, consider reporting them if they continually edit against clear consensus.
Kosack (
talk) 20:11, 7 December 2019 (UTC)reply
-Goes back to September, October, and November as well. Check edit history (multiple IPs)
RedPatchBoys (
talk) 22:44, 7 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: Same nickname-related vandalism that led to the previous period of semi-protection.
Some context.
Zagalejo^^^ 20:42, 7 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 00:51, 8 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of Bagumba, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Malcolmxl5 (
talk) 01:17, 8 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – BLP vandalism that has been consistent and ongoing for months.
Paisarepa (
talk) 23:37, 7 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of three years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. As an alternative to indefinite protection.
Malcolmxl5 (
talk) 00:29, 8 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Declined Low scale edits from a single registered user. Appears to have gone cold now as well. Please feel free to request again if the user persists.
Kosack (
talk) 19:58, 7 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. Minor levels of vandalism over one month ago that was unfortunately only recently discovered. Short term protection will be of little use now.
Kosack (
talk) 20:14, 7 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Indefinite extended confirmed: Persistent
disruptive editing – Persistent vandalism.
Sony R (
talk) 12:59, 7 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. Only one disruptive edit this week, certainly not enough for indefinite protection.
Kosack (
talk) 20:08, 7 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Users keep adding content that is not appropriate for this entry.
QRep2020 (
talk) 13:35, 9 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Agreed to above, A user keeps removing sections that are valid for article and ignoring talk page for article.
Phyronian (
talk) 13:49, 9 December 2019 (UTC)reply
User(s)
blocked. Both the above users blocked for 31 hours apiece for breaching
WP:3RR. Fish+
Karate 14:41, 9 December 2019 (UTC)reply
@
Fish and karate: If the edit-warring persists or escalates after the users' ban expires, I recommend Pending changes protection.ωικιωαrrιorᑫᑫ1ᑫ 16:48, 9 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: Repeated changes by IP editor, who even indicates in response an edit summary indicating errors made by them
state: "I don't care. You're vandalizing. Stop already." thus indicate they will continue to return these errors.
Spshu (
talk) 14:02, 9 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of
dispute resolution. I honestly can't tell whether the changes you're edit warring with an IP to retain are improvements. The IP seems to object to you shortening NBCUniversal to NBCU but that to me seems not unreasonable, and isn't really something weorth protecting the article over, as are the other changes. Try discussing each point on the talk page rather than edit-warring. Fish+
Karate 14:57, 9 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Near-constant vandalism and
BLPSOURCE violations since PCP was applied at the beginning of 2014.
Philroc(c) 14:09, 9 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – A lot of vandalism in the last few days on this BLP.
WJ94 (
talk) 14:33, 9 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 15:28, 9 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Already protected by administrator El C.
Malcolmxl5 (
talk) 17:47, 9 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last
8 days.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 16:28, 9 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 17:43, 9 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Already protected by administrator K6ka.
Malcolmxl5 (
talk) 17:46, 9 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. Discussed all these requests for protection on Captain Medusa's talk page. Fish+
Karate 11:33, 9 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Vandalism continues after last week's protection, needs some more time with a lock on.
Lordtobi (
✉) 12:10, 9 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fish+
Karate 14:35, 9 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Declined We try and avoid protecting articles featured on the main page whenever possible, article has a lot of eyes on it. Fish+
Karate 11:17, 9 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Vandalism by multiple users.
Darylgolden(
talk)Ping when replying 07:27, 9 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. Pending changes is doing its job. Fish+
Karate 11:21, 9 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. the only edit in the past two weeks was yours. Fish+
Karate 10:49, 9 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – 70% of edits in the past few years have been vandalism.
SUM1 (
talk) 00:58, 9 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. I guess they are if you consider
this sort of thing "
vandalism", which I would not. Fish+
Karate 10:51, 9 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 13:42, 9 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary full protection: Persistent
vandalism – This page has a lot of vandalism.
DragoMynaa (
talk) 20:08, 8 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of
dispute resolution. Differences in opinion are not vandalism. Fish+
Karate 10:34, 9 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism and other unconstructive edits.
Flyer22 Reborn (
talk) 20:41, 8 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Automated comment:@
Flyer22 Reborn: This request cannot be parsed. Please ensure it follows formatting consistent with the current or previous methods of submission.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 20:41, 8 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: Unreal Engine is a freely available game engine, thus this page is repeatedly getting abused by smaller developers to advertise their non-notable games.
Lordtobi (
✉) 13:15, 8 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. Fish+
Karate 10:19, 9 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Page was protected back in May due to an IP constantly replacing the article with fleet changes, They've returned today to make the exact same edit, With the exception of vandals no IPs ever edit this particular article so protecting it wouldn't really harm anyone IP wise, Thanks. –
Davey2010Talk 16:18, 8 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. 1 edit in past 2 1/2 months. Fish+
Karate 10:25, 9 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing (Czech Republic vs Czechia, South Korea vs Korea, China vs Mainland China etc.) by IP edits, popular theme.
Jklamo (
talk) 08:54, 9 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fish+
Karate 11:34, 9 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Indefinite extended confirmed: Persistent
disruptive editing – For some years now, multiple IP editors have attempted to show with unreliable sources that Papas is Albanian. These show no sign of levelling off so we must expect them to continue indefinitely.
Chiswick Chap (
talk) 09:54, 9 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Pending-changes protectedindefinitely., I do not currently see a case here for semi-protection, and extended confirmed protection can only be applid after we have tried semi-protection--
Ymblanter (
talk) 11:38, 9 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Spike in vandalism, since Bahrain won their first match in the Arabian Gulf Cup yesterday. .
Matix X2 (
talk) 10:28, 9 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk) 11:30, 9 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Permanent semi-protection: recurring problematic edits by IPs or socks/new editors. A lot of the history over the years is reverting edits of such accounts. It's one of those trouble magnets that will be better of under a semi. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus|
reply here 10:35, 9 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., the article is IMO too infrequently edited for semi and has not been protected since 2011. I have configured one year pending changes, after this year expires we should see how this protection has worked, and whether we would need to go to semi, or configure indefinite PC, or drop the protection anyway.--
Ymblanter (
talk) 11:26, 9 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – can we get three days of anon ip protection? An anon IP keeps adding non-consensus info and several of us have to keep reverting. They have been asked to bring it to talk but maybe a couple days will help.
Fyunck(click) (
talk) 10:39, 9 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk) 11:21, 9 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – A lot of
xenophobic and
racist edits made by unconfirmed IPs. She just won
Miss Universe 2019, so the article is constantly being targeted by unconfirmed IPs, with very xenophobic and racist edits such as
this and
this. Please apply page/article protection. Thanks.
Migsmigss (
talk) 10:45, 9 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk) 11:18, 9 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Besides the persistent vandalism, unconfirmed IPs also attack editors, as could be seen
here and
here, as examples. Requesting for temporary semi-protection to avoid said vandals and also their personal attacks on editors. Thanks.
Migsmigss (
talk) 04:51, 9 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 wk, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fish+
Karate 11:00, 9 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Indefinite template protection:High-risk template.....vandalism being missed for weeks ....no need for new editors to edit highly long stable doc page. Moxy🍁 06:17, 9 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi protection: High level of IP vandalism as she has just won a high profile British reality series.
DarkGlow (
talk) 22:58, 8 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fish+
Karate 10:42, 9 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary Semi-protection Persistent IP vandalism by multiple IPs over the last several days.
Hog Farm (
talk) 23:31, 8 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 02:53, 9 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Already protected by administrator Mazca. Fish+
Karate 10:43, 9 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Since semi-protection was lifted on November 30 there has been a range of IP vandalism on the article. It should be noted that the subject of the article - Raab is a living person (BLP) and is running as an MP in a current election.
Spy-cicle💥 Talk? 00:36, 9 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Stepping up from previous protection periods, indefinite not warranted (yet). Fish+
Karate 10:47, 9 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 02:53, 9 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Already protected by administrator Mazca. Fish+
Karate 10:51, 9 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: High incidence of IP editors making changes to longstanding, well-sourced article material and BLP violations that are subsequently reverted. Article has been semi-protected for most of its existence but was recently downgraded to pending changes protection. Requesting the restoration of indefinite semi-protection as Chomsky is both a very well-known and very controversial figure.
Vrrajkum (
talk) 02:41, 9 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Indefinite semi-protection. Currently pending changes, but most edits are BLP vandalism by IPs. Massive amounts of vandalism recently. Requesting upgrade to semi-protection due to massive spike in vandalism.
Hog Farm (
talk) 03:30, 9 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Left indefinite pending changes in place also. Fish+
Karate 10:56, 9 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last
8 days.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 20:41, 8 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fish+
Karate 10:36, 9 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary pending changes: Persistent
disruptive editing – Edit history shows unsourced information being added while sourced information being removed would benefit from PC protection . Alucard 16❯❯❯ chat? 22:03, 8 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – Since the recent death of
Juice Wrld, IP and new registered users keep adding unsourced content in the article.
TheAmazingPeanuts (
talk) 16:15, 8 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fish+
Karate 10:24, 9 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary extended confirmed:BLP policy violations – Lots of IP edits to personal life section, including removals of reliable sources.
Doc StrangeMailboxLogbook 17:50, 7 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. –
Muboshgu (
talk) 23:03, 8 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Slow moving edit war with a user who is in effect not responding on the discussion on his own talk page. The Bannertalk 08:43, 8 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of
dispute resolution. –
bradv🍁 05:15, 9 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent
disruptive editing – edit warring by IP-hopper over accuracy of gold-standard source without citing any contrary source or discussing on talk page.
Worldbruce (
talk) 12:37, 8 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. –
bradv🍁 05:16, 9 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – A user who previous vandalized the page is constantly posting on the Talk page and will undoubtedly begin making irrelevant and non-neutral claims about the subject of the entry once the protection lifts tomorrow. I ask that the entry's protection be continued for at least a ciupl3 of weeks.
QRep2020 (
talk) 00:09, 7 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 00:29, 7 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Note: This was in the requests for reduction in protection level section but appears to be a request to extend protection that expired at 07:42, 7 December rather than a request for unprotection. I have moved it here.
Malcolmxl5 (
talk) 00:41, 8 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Declined, I do not see any ongoing disruption--
Ymblanter (
talk) 20:11, 8 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Indefinite extended confirmed: Persistent
vandalism – The page is being edited disruptively by multiple IPs, which are often unable to be detected. so requesting to protect the page for indefinite period.
Sony R (
talk) 15:20, 7 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Note: Semi-protection is sufficient to handle disruption from IP editors. Is that what you mean?
Malcolmxl5 (
talk) 02:07, 8 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 17:40, 8 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: the last discruptive editing is months ago. Therefore one should lower the protection level.
Neutrale Person (
talk) 17:00, 8 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Declined. As already mentioned, let's see how the other downgraded protection does before applying any new ones.
El_C 20:31, 8 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Flood of vandalism from IPs and new users which PCP appears to be ineffective at controlling.
Philroc(c) 16:57, 10 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., the rate of edits (and thus the stress on PC) fluctuates heavily over the non-protected periods. I've gone for a month, though 6 months and indefinite would both be legitimate choices. There are appreciable numbers of IP genuine edits, so this decision was heavily made on a collateral damage basis.
Nosebagbear (
talk) 19:26, 10 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Full protection: The main page shouldn’t be editable, because it will be an easy vandalism target otherwise.
Littelcat456 (
talk) 10:31, 10 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 10:48, 10 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Already protected. For several years, in fact.
Favonian (
talk) 17:52, 10 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – The article has seen vandalism over a period of 4 days by 3 IP editors. 祝好,
Josephua(
聊天) 13:20, 10 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —
Tom Morris (
talk) 16:01, 10 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Anon users consistently changing Soviet Union to Russia and Yugoslavia to Serbia. Obviously without consensus.
Pelmeen10 (
talk) 11:20, 10 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra 13:51, 10 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – Different IPs removing content due to "Lack of neutrality" or "hostile and inaccurate edit" when the content is neutral. ~
riley(talk) 07:29, 10 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Indefinite move protection: An RM discussion on the article's talk page in February 2019 ended with no consensus to move. Despite this, the page has been moved several times this year, each time to an incorrect disambiguation without any discussion, twice by one editor.
AussieLegend (
✉) 08:00, 10 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Move protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra 13:44, 10 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection:Persistent addition of false and unsourced content by certain IPs.
[5]. My apologies as i have no time to keep following the page from corruption and i am no editor either, but there're certain IPs who keep adding totally false content about the International star without adding any source. Thank you Wikipedia, I respect you a lot.
MinaKarm (
talk) 09:55, 10 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. -- Deepfriedokra 13:47, 10 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 05:32, 10 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: His tragic death has caused an uptick in IP vandalism and IPs paying their respects on the page, which is not the appropriate place to do so.
CAMERAwMUSTACHE (
talk) 05:21, 10 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra 13:31, 10 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Note: No response from Longhair but the serious issues which led to indefinite semi-protection were quite recent and unprotection is not warranted, in my opinion. Fish+
Karate 10:49, 9 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Pending changes: Persistent
disruptive editing – Over and over again, IPs have added blatantly false (and suspiciously similar) information to the article implying the USA was somehow involved in producing the show. This also includes US airdates, contradicting both the title and the well-sourced, earlier Canadian date.
Modernponderer (
talk) 22:21, 9 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
MelanieN (
talk) 03:07, 10 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Edit warring on genres in the infobox, including the removal of one that is sourced.
Doc StrangeMailboxLogbook 23:00, 9 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
MelanieN (
talk) 03:09, 10 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. There's a lot going on here, and both registered users and IP addresses seem to be borderline edit-warring. Everyone needs to go to the talk page. Full protected for a week while the editors sort themselves out; protected edit requests may be made.
Risker (
talk) 05:43, 10 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection. Persistent IP disruption. Cattelan made the famous banana taped to the wall. Six or so IPs have been by in the past days to contribute silly and mostly derogatory edits.
ThatMontrealIP (
talk) 01:18, 10 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Declined Shortly before requestor posted this, @
Diannaa: hid the content of 258 revisions for copyvio, which seem to be most of the edits from Feb 2013 to Dec 9, 2018. Many, but not all, edits came from the requestor.
— Maile (
talk) 01:59, 10 December 2019 (UTC)reply
@
ThatMontrealIP: I wonder if you can see what I see, since I'm an admin. Can you look at Page/History? Scroll down all the edits. Anything that has a line drawn through the date, means the edit was hidden. A lot of yours are like that. But as I say, it goes back to Feb 2013. I think I should correct my statement, in the fact that it involves many of your edits, but there are so many other edits that were hidden. Can you also view Page / Page Logs / All Page Logs? There you will see the log that says Diannaa changed visibility of 258 revisions and why. If you have questions about this, please free to contact Diannaa.
— Maile (
talk)
I can see all your describe. I have nothing to do with the revision-deleted items-- I just reported the copyvio that had been inserted back in 2013, and Diannaa took care of it. She rev-delled six years of edits; mine were all in the last two days, so you are incorrect to associate me with 99% of the removed material. (I just looked it up and only oversighters can see the removed material, so now I understand the confusion: you cannot see it.)
ThatMontrealIP (
talk) 02:29, 10 December 2019 (UTC)reply
@
ThatMontrealIP: the edits have not been suppressed (that's reserved for extreme cases), they have only been revdeleted, which, yes, us admins can still view.
El_C 02:33, 10 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Ok well just an FYI: I am one of the good guys. Sigining off as this is becoming unproductive.
ThatMontrealIP (
talk) 02:34, 10 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Yes, well, I apologize for my original wording about the rev-deletes that were your edits. But, otherwise, once we get past the long list of rev-deletes, that only leaves two edits on Dec 9, and the Dec 10 edits. There have only been 2 other editors besides you in those days, and you reverted one of those editors. Since this seems to have limited the number of current editors, I'm not sure it justifies semi-protection. Maybe wait a week or two and see if the disruptive edits pick up again. Right now, the page seems to have been cleaned up by you and Diannaa.
— Maile (
talk) 02:40, 10 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Indefinite pending changes: Persistent
vandalism – Moderately frequent vandalism, but a heavy majority of the edits to the page are vandalism. Not enough to warrant semi-protection, but given that most of the edits to this page are vandalisms, requesting pending changes.
Hog Farm (
talk) 04:35, 10 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Unprotection This page was indefinitely semi-protected by
Boing! said Zebedee in 2012 who has since retired as an admin.
In this discussion at his talk page, he indicates he does not see the need for indefinite protection. The protection was properly placed due to severe POV issues but in the succeeding 7 years there is nothing to indicate continued problems. Only 2 edit requests have been made since it was protected, one of which was unformed and the other innocuous, but there seems to be no reason to keep it protected.
Eggishorn(talk)(contrib) 20:24, 9 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to have already been unprotected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 04:01, 10 December 2019 (UTC)reply
JJMC89 removed protection based on request at the talk page. This can be closed & archived.
Eggishorn(talk)(contrib) 04:08, 10 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Already unprotected. by me —
JJMC89 (
T·C) 04:13, 10 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – Ongoing edit war throwing around accusations of bad evidence, no sources being cited.
911ChickenCop (
talk) 00:28, 10 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Declined Besides you, there is only one editor involved since November. They are providing credible/verifiable sourcing for their edits.
— Maile (
talk) 00:49, 10 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Pending changes/semi-protection: Constant vandalism: average is now about 10 vandalism edits a month; 11 reverts in last 30 days, 21 in last 60 days.
85.76.3.153 (
talk) 17:45, 9 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
El_C 02:07, 10 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Pending-changes protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
El_C 02:07, 10 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent addition of
unsourced or poorly sourced content – The beauty pageant community is completely plagued by vandals, disruptive editors, and unsourced content. This article was just created so I doubt indefinite protection will be awarded now, but the article will be subject to vandalism every time it is unprotected just like every other article in the community is.
{ [ ( jjj1238 ) ] } 17:43, 9 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Indeed, an indefinite is a likely out come, but we gotta through the motions first.
El_C 01:58, 10 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection. Subject in currently the news, persistent IP vandalism. Please protect for a day or two. --
bender235 (
talk) 01:34, 10 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
El_C 02:00, 10 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – IPs introducing incorrect population figures different from the source. .
Fylindfotberserk (
talk) 14:23, 9 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk) 01:40, 10 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism from unregistered editors. The annual
football rivalry game between the Naval Academy and the
Military Academy is this coming Saturday so I wouldn't be surprised if we end up semi-protected several other related pages, too.
ElKevbo (
talk) 17:36, 9 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk) 01:41, 10 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Vandalism from wide-ranging IP hopper.
Suffusion of Yellow (
talk) 00:34, 10 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
— Maile (
talk) 00:57, 10 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection. Main vandalizing IP has been blocked. Fish+
Karate 10:23, 9 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. One brief spate from schoolchildren which seems to have stopped. Fish+
Karate 10:44, 9 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Declined Relatively stale - only 2 recent reversions, nothing in last 8 hours, please resubmit if reoccurs
Nosebagbear (
talk) 16:47, 11 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Revoke talk page access Inappropriate use of user talk page while blocked – Blocked user has resumed advertising edits on modus operandi theme on their talk page, but without access to deleted revs I cannot know for sure.
Optakeover(U)(T)(C) 20:22, 11 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Full protection: Persistent
vandalism – Random user repeatedly keeps putting back incorrect information.
TheBigMan720 (
talk) 20:31, 11 December 2019 (UTC)reply
(Non-administrator comment) Looks like a content dispute. Also Full Protection is inappropriate for such cases.
Optakeover(U)(T)(C) 20:42, 11 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Requesting immediate archiving... – I've warnedUser:Lsw2472 that they are risking a block if they add unsourced material again. This is, in fact, a BLP article.
EdJohnston (
talk) 21:48, 11 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Edit war occurring with new registered user and others. Possibly vandalism.
Mr Xaero☎️ 15:07, 11 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: ip editor keeps removing mentions of the youth Olympic Games from tables as shown
here. Cards84664(talk) 15:39, 11 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., I think at this stage pendicg changes should work--
Ymblanter (
talk) 16:15, 11 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – The title of the article has been changed twice on the basis of two unreliable references (one is outdated and the other is by a non-expert). .
Semsurî (
talk) 10:26, 11 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Note: This is a content dispute. Please make your arguments on the talk page, if unable to achieve consensus, seek
WP:dispute resolution -- Deepfriedokra 11:09, 11 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: Requesting semi-protection as several IP users are currently messing up with the medal scores for the
2019 Southeast Asian Games. Need protection immediately. Thanks.
TheGreatSG'rean (
talk) 05:18, 11 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Admins, if you are reading this, it's my second alert. Apparently, the IP vandals are still changing the medal tallies. Can anyone please place the page on semi-protection? Thanks.
TheGreatSG'rean (
talk) 11:44, 11 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vandalism reverted.
Malcolmxl5 (
talk) 14:39, 11 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Indonesian IPs trying to max out their country's number of medals.
Tuanminh01 (
talk) 10:32, 11 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Malcolmxl5 (
talk) 14:53, 11 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Note: Vandal is continually finding new IPs to vandalize. I'm afraid blocking the user isn't enough. Can we please reconsider?
Mifford (
talk) 11:22, 11 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Note: Vandal: concurred - see hist diff. Kindly protect the page.
CASSIOPEIA(
talk) 11:25, 11 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Declined@
Migsmigss: Sorry but it's hard to work out why the edits there are
vandalism. Please explain why the edits are a problem on the article talk page and link to the section in the edit summary of the next couple of reverts. Then post again if no discussion but issue continues.
Johnuniq (
talk) 08:17, 11 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Declined@
Migsmigss: Sorry but it's hard to work out why the edits there are
vandalism. Please explain why the edits are a problem on the article talk page and link to the section in the edit summary of the next couple of reverts. Then post again if no discussion but issue continues.
Johnuniq (
talk) 08:16, 11 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism from IP-hopper.
Mifford (
talk) 11:23, 11 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 11:55, 11 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Move protection: Mainly a problem of one user,
User:Democratic Backsliding, who made a sudden non-consensus name change of this article from
Protests of 2019; this user has the status of an extended confirmed user but seems to keep editing (and now did a page move) without taking into account the concerns raised in discussions (mainly deletion discussions) in relation to the article.
Boud (
talk) 22:30, 10 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Declined@
Boud: As I understand, you oppose the recent move and have started a move request on article talk. If it is protected, it will stay the way it is until the move request is settled. Why not just not move the article any further, and let the discussion continue?
Johnuniq (
talk) 07:02, 11 December 2019 (UTC)reply
I'm not fully sure of what you were proposing (although I can make some guesses), but in any case, it's now a moot point - できますさん sorted this out from the page move side.
Boud (
talk) 20:15, 11 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: This is due to IP users minor edit making a page very disruptive.
ACQ322Acuity (
answer me) 02:09, 11 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Declined@
Apollo C. Quiboloy fans: No IP has recently edited the article. I notified a user who has been misusing the minor tag that they should not do that in the future.
Johnuniq (
talk) 07:15, 11 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – due to vandalism in filmography.
DragoMynaa (
talk) 05:08, 10 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Declined@
DragoMynaa: Sorry to be difficult but it's hard to work out why the edits there are
vandalism. Please post again with a couple of diffs and a brief explanation if the issue continues.
Johnuniq (
talk) 06:36, 11 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: IP vandalism. Needs protection after death of singer.--
BabbaQ (
talk) 18:20, 10 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Declined@
BabbaQ: Sorry but the three recent IP diffs that I checked were all good. Please post again with a couple of diffs and a brief explanation if the issue continues.
Johnuniq (
talk) 06:47, 11 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: IP vandalism and change of content without reason.
Oliszydlowski (
talk) 19:32, 10 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Declined@
Oliszydlowski: Sorry but the four recent IP diffs that I checked seem to be a content dispute involving putting a name that is in the lead of the article into the infobox. Please explain why that is a problem on the article talk page and link to the section in the edit summary of the next couple of reverts. Then post again if no discussion but issue continues.
Johnuniq (
talk) 06:52, 11 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last
8 days.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 02:53, 11 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
El_C 08:14, 11 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection:BLP policy violations – BLP violations have resumed after the previous period of protection expired.
Wham2001 (
talk) 06:07, 11 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Johnuniq (
talk) 08:19, 11 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Persistent, annoying, low-level silly vandalism. There's no real reason I can see that IPs/non AC editors need to be able to edit this file description. Begoon 07:43, 11 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Johnuniq (
talk) 08:13, 11 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Not enough recent activity for longer. Indefinite is rarely appropriate.
Johnuniq (
talk) 06:42, 11 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Socking too.
IanDBeacon (
talk) 19:38, 10 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Protected by another admin.
Johnuniq (
talk) 06:53, 11 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. The article has previously been temporarily semi-protected but vandalism has resumed when the time-limited protection expired. I suspect vandalism will continue as long as Ms Lights continues to be a) a spokesperson for Extinction Rebellion, b) female, and c) not white. Please can we apply protection until further notice?
John Stumbles (
talk) 20:07, 11 November 2019 (UTC)reply UPDATE Zion's page is still getting vandalised by anonymous IPs. Please can we give it continuing protection?
John Stumbles (
talk) 23:57, 10 December 2019 (UTC)reply
John Stumbles, sorry, mate, this is well below the usual level required for protection, tedious though it is. Guy (
help!) 00:06, 11 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. –
bradv🍁 00:37, 11 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of
unsourced or poorly sourced content – The article is part of current ongoing event. Better to protect for 3 days to avoid vandalism/misinformation. .
Accesscrawl (
talk) 06:02, 10 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Johnuniq (
talk) 06:37, 11 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: - IP vandalism, removing age info. Article needs rest.--
BabbaQ (
talk) 23:08, 10 December 2019 (UTC)reply
BabbaQ, it is hard to think of a more terrible idea than fighting with an IP over inclusion of exact birth dates for a living individual. In a very large percentage of cases, the IP is the subject or a close connection, and they have a compelling reason not to want the date included. Of course it's harder when they have no account, but please let them know about how to contact OTRS and how to use the talk page, and for now, leave the information out. Guy (
help!) 23:13, 10 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Declined Unsourced DOBs should be removed, not re-added repeatedly.
Primefac (
talk) 00:35, 11 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Also some revdel willbe needed. Likely related to anove report on Lakeshore High School.
John from Idegon (
talk) 20:32, 10 December 2019 (UTC)reply
User(s)
blocked. Blocked by Widr. Some revdel done.
Malcolmxl5 (
talk) 23:47, 10 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Persistent deletion of content without explanation.
Leschnei (
talk) 00:06, 11 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of four days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Malcolmxl5 (
talk) 02:57, 11 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Continuous addition of unsourced dedication claim. - FlightTime (
open channel) 17:52, 10 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 23:52, 10 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Already protected by administrator JzG.
Malcolmxl5 (
talk) 01:50, 11 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 23:52, 10 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Already protected by administrator JzG.
Malcolmxl5 (
talk) 02:00, 11 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. IP continues to removed referenced information.
Kansas Bear (
talk) 00:30, 11 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 01:37, 11 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Frequent disruptive edits by IP addresses with unsourced content. --GouramiWatcherTalk 22:02, 10 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Bishonen |
talk 22:07, 10 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Two days of racist vandalism. Please semi for a bit.
John from Idegon (
talk) 19:45, 10 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: Inappropriate use of user talk page while blocked.
IanDBeacon (
talk) 20:32, 10 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Talk-page access revoked, account globally locked after attempting similar abuse on meta.wikimedia.org.
IanDBeacon, you were definitely correct, but please keep in mind to take enormous care when removing someone's unblock request. In this specific case, it did not even do harm; it would have attracted the attention of an administrator automatically, pretty conveniently.
~ ToBeFree (
talk) 20:56, 10 December 2019 (UTC)reply
User(s)
blocked. Creative usage of the protection noticeboard.
~ ToBeFree (
talk) 20:56, 10 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. A category of all thing...
Malcolmxl5 (
talk) 23:35, 10 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection:WP:TOOSOON, barely any information to warrant changing it off of being a redirect. Semi-protection may be incorrect, I'm not entirely sure. It is mainly a user constantly doing
WP:DE by reverting my changes, seemingly ignoring my warnings on their talk page.
Magitroopa (
talk) 06:18, 10 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Edit war. Reporter warned one last time, other participant blocked for 24 hours.
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., let us see if pending changes protection could help us--
Ymblanter (
talk) 21:39, 10 December 2019 (UTC)reply
@
Vaibhavafro: I don't like pending changes—to me it's just a hassle where other editors are supposed to take ownership of edits by non-autoconfirmed users. I know the rules don't say that, and the idea is that you should approve anything that is not blatantly bad, but I like to take a bit more care than that. That is my personal problem. If any admin wants to alter the protection settings, please do so without further discussion. If a brief proposal to use pending changes on the article talk page has consensus (or no objections) after 24 hours, ping me and I will do it. By that time, the semi-protection will be close to expiry.
Johnuniq (
talk) 07:04, 12 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Note: Not happy abput lowering protection that has proven necessary, and PC is not appropriate with high volume editing. As there is discussion under way, perhaps the matters can be settled. I echo Johnuniq's reluctance to reintroduce disruption needlessly.-- Deepfriedokra 19:12, 12 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Declined – The proponent of the unprotection,
User:Vaibhavafro, links to
Special:Contributions/2601:644:400:7B10:F513:6DC4:BDDA:34B9 who he believes was editing the article in good faith. When an article has such a high volume of edits, and when most of the IP edits are bad, it is too great a burden on the regular editors to have to sort the good from the bad contributions. Under PC, every bad IP edit needs to be individually reverted. The good faith IP mentioned by Vabhavafro is welcome to use {{Edit semiprotected}} template on the talk page to submit their material.
EdJohnston (
talk) 19:31, 12 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Gerrit Cole(
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs) Garrett Cole is no longer a Free agent. He just signed with the New York Yankees for a 9 year contract. This needs to be fixed asap. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Jarmusic2 (
talk •
contribs) 12:53, 12 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Edit request already open on talk page. – Thjarkur(talk) 13:08, 12 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Not done As the OP has verified,
Talk:Gerrit Cole is not protected, so, according to the instructions above, that's where requests belong.
Favonian (
talk) 17:43, 12 December 2019 (UTC)reply
@
Vaibhavafro: I don't like pending changes—to me it's just a hassle where other editors are supposed to take ownership of edits by non-autoconfirmed users. I know the rules don't say that, and the idea is that you should approve anything that is not blatantly bad, but I like to take a bit more care than that. That is my personal problem. If any admin wants to alter the protection settings, please do so without further discussion. If a brief proposal to use pending changes on the article talk page has consensus (or no objections) after 24 hours, ping me and I will do it. By that time, the semi-protection will be close to expiry.
Johnuniq (
talk) 07:04, 12 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Note: Not happy abput lowering protection that has proven necessary, and PC is not appropriate with high volume editing. As there is discussion under way, perhaps the matters can be settled. I echo Johnuniq's reluctance to reintroduce disruption needlessly.-- Deepfriedokra 19:12, 12 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Declined – The proponent of the unprotection,
User:Vaibhavafro, links to
Special:Contributions/2601:644:400:7B10:F513:6DC4:BDDA:34B9 who he believes was editing the article in good faith. When an article has such a high volume of edits, and when most of the IP edits are bad, it is too great a burden on the regular editors to have to sort the good from the bad contributions. Under PC, every bad IP edit needs to be individually reverted. The good faith IP mentioned by Vabhavafro is welcome to use {{Edit semiprotected}} template on the talk page to submit their material.
EdJohnston (
talk) 19:31, 12 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Gerrit Cole(
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs) Garrett Cole is no longer a Free agent. He just signed with the New York Yankees for a 9 year contract. This needs to be fixed asap. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Jarmusic2 (
talk •
contribs) 12:53, 12 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Edit request already open on talk page. – Thjarkur(talk) 13:08, 12 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Not done As the OP has verified,
Talk:Gerrit Cole is not protected, so, according to the instructions above, that's where requests belong.
Favonian (
talk) 17:43, 12 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Persistent addition of hoax game. Ip hopper passing off fan made video as actual game.
Crboyer (
talk) 14:50, 12 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing. This is a ongoing league, people are adding statistics as their wish, I had to correct several times for last few days. And the latest edits showing people now adding their own name in the article. Need immediate protect from Ips and new users. They may work with other articles to learn how to do but not a good idea with a ongoing league articles.
Dey subrata (
talk) 09:52, 11 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk) 17:03, 12 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent
disruptive editing – Recent repeated removal of sourced information from single users.
Optakeover(U)(T)(C) 16:12, 11 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last
8 days.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 16:26, 11 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Note: Looks like a content dispute to me.
Malcolmxl5 (
talk) 16:36, 11 December 2019 (UTC)reply
@
Malcolmxl5: Did you look at the edit history? By the number of different users making the same edits and claiming the same reason? By the same number of restorers would you not think consensus is clear per BRD? How do you also explain
this recent message from the user? This clearly NPOV, and I don't see what's the controversy here.
Optakeover(U)(T)(C) 16:49, 11 December 2019 (UTC)reply
@
Malcolmxl5: If it is shown a Twitter post is not sufficient as a reliable source, then I'll take down this report and eat my shoe.
Optakeover(U)(T)(C) 16:52, 11 December 2019 (UTC)reply
I’ll let other admins chip in, I don’t propose to take any action on this request myself having commented. --
Malcolmxl5 (
talk) 17:13, 11 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Declined@
Optakeover:This edit is misguided because it misused rollback for a change that was not
WP:VAND, and it uses primary sources instead of
WP:SECONDARY (making the edit original research as the editor's conclusion), and Twitter is definitely not a reliable source for that kind of thing—try
WP:RSN for other opinions. This is a content dispute—please do not edit war and do not use rollback except for blatant vandalism.
Johnuniq (
talk) 10:11, 12 December 2019 (UTC)reply
I'm seeing the addition of a reference, and I wonder if the removal of the other content is accidental?
Primefac (
talk) 00:44, 11 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Declined, seems to have stopped.--
Ymblanter (
talk) 12:22, 12 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Long-term pending changes protection: Even after adding invisible comments to not add Titanfall and Titanfall 2 they still add it to the article.
TurboSonic (
talk) 01:38, 12 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of
dispute resolution. Whether a game belongs on the list should be decided through consensus, not page protection. Try an
RFC.
NinjaRobotPirate (
talk) 10:33, 12 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 15:04, 12 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Already protected by administrator El C. -- Deepfriedokra 15:31, 12 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism from a previously banned registered user, who uses several IP addresses and is involved in edit wars with other IP users for a couple of months. -
Sthenel (
talk) 15:20, 10 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., not sure it would be of any help though since the user is persistent, and the page is edited almost exclusively by IPs.--
Ymblanter (
talk) 12:21, 12 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Looks relatively temporary/short-lived. If it restarts after the protection ends, come back and ask for longer. —
Tom Morris (
talk) 12:59, 12 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Periodic disruptive editing and vandalism each time protection expires.
137.97.136.203 (
talk) 07:01, 10 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk) 12:16, 12 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
sockpuppetry – Persistent target of MariaJaydHicky socks.
Aoi (青い) (
talk) 20:20, 11 December 2019 (UTC)reply
No you add the vandalism back so it should be protected from you and for the admin to only edit it.
109.144.222.3 (
talk) 20:22, 11 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Indefinite semi-protection:BLP policy violations – Person is rape accused, escaped controversial Godmen of India who founded new country recently. Too much defamatory details about him are being added. Harshil want to talk? 11:22, 12 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk) 12:12, 12 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Multiple vandalism from both IP editors and newly registered editors.
TJRC (
talk) 00:55, 12 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
NinjaRobotPirate (
talk) 11:20, 12 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary protection: Persistant disruption by IPs hoppers adding unsouced content
CASSIOPEIA(
talk) 02:49, 12 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Looks like a long-term issue.
NinjaRobotPirate (
talk) 11:40, 12 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Persistent vandalism and violation of the BLP policy.
Hog Farm (
talk) 05:44, 12 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 06:00, 12 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Revoke talk page access: - Abuse of talk page while blocked.
Optakeover(U)(T)(C) 20:52, 11 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Done by Bradv. Requests like this should go to either
WP:AN or an admin's talk page, though.
NinjaRobotPirate (
talk) 10:20, 12 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection:BLP policy violations – Repeated insertion of unsourced statement.
Ninja✮Strikers«
☎» 06:45, 12 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of three weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Johnuniq (
talk) 10:18, 12 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Not a protected page, but something which needs an admin's routine touch; and I don't know of a better place to post.
The DAB page
Duarte includes the warning "Attention editors! No red links. Every entry in this list must have an article written in the English Wikipedia, with reliable sources to support inclusion, else it will be removed without warning." This is inappropriate for a DAB page in two ways:
WP:DABRED (certain redlinks are allowed) and
WP:DABREF (references are not allowed). It should be removed.
The warning seems to have been added when the page was created in June 2012, by an admin on Indonesian WP.
Duarte (name) was split out in September 2018. The edit history of Duarte suggests that the warning could perhaps be added there (even though in my experience, and this particular edit history illustrates that, few editors pay any attention to it).
Narky Blert (
talk) 08:04, 11 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Automated comment:@
Narky Blert: This request cannot be parsed. Please ensure it follows formatting consistent with the current or previous methods of submission.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 08:09, 11 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Done I have removed it.
Malcolmxl5 (
talk) 12:27, 11 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. It may need to be extended if they come back, but this kind of disruption often blows over quickly.
NinjaRobotPirate (
talk) 09:52, 12 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Move protection: Page title dispute/move warring – Not clear if the name of the division has actually changed, editors and IPs moving without any discussion and consensus in the talk page. Page should be move protected until a discussion has taken place and has concluded. HurricaneGeek2002talk 19:24, 11 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Multiple IPs making unconstructive POV edits.
SharabSalam (
talk) 19:50, 11 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Full protection as we have at least one new but confirmed account. This is about adding material to this article blaming the group for the
2019 Jersey City shooting - evidently one person was at one time a follower, which most experienced editors on the page believe is not enough to add to this article.
Doug Wellertalk 07:34, 12 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Fully protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Johnuniq (
talk) 10:13, 12 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Several IP vandals have been active on this page today.
P. D. CookTalk to me! 19:51, 11 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Johnuniq (
talk) 10:15, 12 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Inappropriate use of user talk page while blocked – Inappropriate use of talk page while blocked (soapboxing, BLP violations, and personal attacks).
Aoi (青い) (
talk) 20:51, 11 December 2019 (UTC)reply
(Non-administrator comment) Talk page access should be revoked.
Optakeover(U)(T)(C) 20:54, 11 December 2019 (UTC)reply
User(s)
blocked. – by
User:Favonian for 72 hours. I have re-issued the block with access to his talk page disabled due to abuse.
EdJohnston (
talk) 21:59, 11 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. - a legitimate application normally, but we attempt to leave the Front Page article unprotected unless there's active vandalism and it seems to have ceased for now. Can be resubmitted if it starts up again
Nosebagbear (
talk) 21:34, 11 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Requesting long-term semi. Despite pending changes protection since May, page continues to be hit regularly by numerous IP editors changing things like episode names, years and dates, seemingly at random, with few to no legitimate edits in between. Page has a long history of previous protection, consider indefinite (as the show is long since ended)? Belinrahs|talk ⁄ edits 22:14, 12 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I agree the vandalism is currently too frequent for PC to work well.
MelanieN (
talk) 22:50, 13 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: Cross wiki spam of this particular person meant the title was protected. The person behind it is blocked, but IPs and a new account (possibly them) are creating the talk page repeatedly. The creations (except the first one) paste the content of the cross wiki spam on the talk page as edit requests. The
draft was deleted at MfD and a new draft is unlikely to meet the concerns raised. It has been deleted 5 times in 5 days.
Dreamy Jazz 🎷 talk to me | my contributions 15:00, 13 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Persistent "cutesy" vandalism to new article for popular character, it's getting a little ridiculous. —
TAnthonyTalk 15:20, 13 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk) 16:55, 13 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: There appears to be some kind of IP edit war with accusations of sock puppetry to boot on the above pages. Some valid edits from other users appear to have possibly been lost in the mix for some pages. -
2pou (
talk) 22:06, 12 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of one month, all, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
El_C 14:31, 13 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent addition of
unsourced or poorly sourced content – Unsourced content added by more than one editor in less than 24 hours. I've already reverted the edits twice and don't want to breach the 3RR rule.
Semsurî (
talk) 22:10, 12 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
El_C 14:28, 13 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – IP vandalism and BLP violations starting a few hours ago. -- LuK3(Talk) 14:12, 13 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
El_C 14:35, 13 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: It's election day here in the UK and we're getting a lot of IP editing, some of which is disruptive, sometimes deliberately, sometimes well-intentioned but against existing consensus.
Bondegezou (
talk) 13:45, 12 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk) 11:27, 13 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Extended confirmed protection: Let’s be real. The only reason that disputes about how to word her nationality are happening is because the page is unprotected and IP users think that is free reign. I turned the ignored hidden note into a real note and now it’s going into stupid edit war territory.
Trillfendi (
talk) 18:19, 12 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra 19:05, 12 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Note: Looks like edit warring. The alternative to page protection is warnings and blocks. -- Deepfriedokra 19:05, 12 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Users are changing him to be a fan of the Eagles as a joke based on a recent episode of a web series
Jcamping (
talk) 05:27, 13 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —
Tom Morris (
talk) 11:06, 13 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Because of the election, many are vandalizing.
WikiWriter5045 (
talk) 06:56, 13 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection., whereas it is likely that the article would need to be protected in the future, just one vandal edit is not sufficient for us to configure protection--
Ymblanter (
talk) 07:40, 13 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 04:23, 13 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Protected by another admin.
Johnuniq (
talk) 09:43, 13 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Yes, please. I can't handle Nate's death threats anymore. —
FilmandTVFan28 (
talk) 04:07, 13 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 04:23, 13 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Protected by another admin.
Johnuniq (
talk) 09:44, 13 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Edit warring/content dispute involving multiple parties. Needs full protection so discussion can proceed on talk page and disagreements can be resolved.
Freeknowledgecreator (
talk) 09:44, 13 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Fully protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Johnuniq (
talk) 09:49, 13 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Constant target of schoolboy vandalism, a good bit of which is overtly racist. Revdel may be appropriate for the most recent. Thanks. Julietdeltalima(talk) 21:05, 12 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Johnuniq (
talk) 09:26, 13 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – persistent vandalism by an SPA and now an IP (presumed sock). VelellaVelella Talk 23:01, 12 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Johnuniq (
talk) 09:30, 13 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 03:38, 13 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Protected by another admin.
Johnuniq (
talk) 09:33, 13 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 03:38, 13 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Protected by another admin.
Johnuniq (
talk) 09:34, 13 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 03:38, 13 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Protected by another admin.
Johnuniq (
talk) 09:35, 13 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – There are multiple IPs which are doing to much disruptive edits which are being hard to detect. So, requesting to protect the page for indefinite period.
Sony R (
talk) 08:36, 12 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., too infrequently edited for semi-protection, let us try pending changes--
Ymblanter (
talk) 08:28, 13 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Indefinite Semi-protection: Past temporary semi-protection has not worked to diminish high level of IP vandalism. At least 80% of the past 500 edits consist of vandalism and reversions of said vandalism. Article's topic is subject to endemic and endless vandalism edits. --
78.8.42.124 (
talk) 10:45, 12 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Johnuniq (
talk) 09:11, 13 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – This event will take place on 14 December, and unconfirmed IPs have begun targeting said article with
vandalism, as could be seen
here, as an example. Hope this page gets protected as soon as possible. Thanks.
Migsmigss (
talk) 16:31, 12 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last
8 days.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 16:34, 12 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Yes, but recent
edits compel a request for semi-protection again. Thanks.
Migsmigss (
talk) 16:37, 12 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Johnuniq (
talk) 09:18, 13 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Repeatedly vandalised in last 24 hours by IPs and new users.
Dorsetonian (
talk) 19:54, 12 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 00:07, 13 December 2019 (UTC)reply
The vandalizing is meant to be humorous but it’s wasting our time, and filling up the history.
Gleeanon409 (
talk) 02:49, 13 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Galobtter (
pingó mió) 09:16, 13 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Still in need of protection. Spurious death date being inserted repeatedly. .
Larry Hockett (
Talk) 06:21, 13 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk) 07:42, 13 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Consensus reached on talk page of how to present information and IP address continually coming in to change it to how they want it. - Galatz גאליץשיחה Talk 14:09, 11 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
MelanieN (
talk) 02:15, 13 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Indefinite semi-protection: This closed discussion has been vandalized ten times by an IP over the past three months. I reported it here previously but it was not protected enough for the vandalism to cease. The last IP edit was the message "I am not deemed a "public figure" by Wikipedia's standards, therefore, I want all associations of my name, along with all comments pertaining to my name by those approved from your company to do so, to immediately be removed. Public figures are fair game, private individuals are not. PLEASE DELETE THIS PAGE!". They are not going away, this was closed three months ago. There's no reason for us to be reverting vandals on a closed discussion. If someone really wants to correct the record, they can ask the protecting admin for permission to do so.
ThatMontrealIP (
talk) 21:14, 12 December 2019 (UTC)reply
If that IP is truly being used by the subject of the article, someone should hide the page. Not sure how people would confirm that, though... -
2pou (
talk) 21:56, 12 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Mz7 (
talk) 03:10, 13 December 2019 (UTC)reply
He is no longer a free agent. We need to edit his page to reflect his current status as a New York Yankee. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Jarmusic2 (
talk •
contribs) 12:57, 12 December 2019 (UTC)reply
(Non-administrator comment) If I were an admin, I'd say Not done, as the article was recently bumped up from
semi- to
extended confirmed protection, seemingly for the same reason this user wants the protection level reduced. Also, a suggestion would get the job done. Just know that I don't have the ability to protect articles, so my word isn't final. InvalidOS (
talk) 14:09, 12 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Not unprotected Without talk page consensus, the changes should not be made.
Favonian (
talk) 17:46, 12 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Repeated removal of sourced content by an IPv6 editor. The article's talk page is being ignored, and since the IP changes within a /64 range, the editor would be unlikely to see messages left for them on the IP talk page. Temporary semi-protection might encourage the IP editor to join the discussion.
Huon (
talk) 19:34, 11 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk) 02:19, 13 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Permanent semi-protection: Same reason as the previous reason for page protection: IPs just will not stop removing content from the infobox for no clear reason after being reverted, and also just blatantly ignore the hidden message to stop. They clearly have no interest in stopping, so they must be prevented from being able to continue.
Rusted AutoParts 04:25, 12 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection. I'll try to keep an eye on the situation, though.
NinjaRobotPirate (
talk) 11:52, 12 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: This user who requested protection has been blocked.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 18:18, 14 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Not done. Request made by sock puppet. If someone in good standing thinks this is a good idea, they can request it.
NinjaRobotPirate (
talk) 18:21, 14 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Vandalism starting back up since previous protection expired. -- LuK3(Talk) 15:54, 14 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing by IPs. Alivardi (
talk) 10:06, 14 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 16:17, 14 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 14:32, 14 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: The page has been receiving persistent vandalism and disruptive editing by IP's over the last two days.
Helper201 (
talk) 15:30, 14 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. It may need longer protection than that if this doesn't blow over; re-request if it keeps up.
NinjaRobotPirate (
talk) 18:48, 14 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Permanent Semi-protection: High level of IP disruptive edits without references.
Random Bruneian (
talk) 06:20, 14 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
NinjaRobotPirate (
talk) 18:01, 14 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. If the disruption keeps up, we'll probably have to go long-term, like a year. This should do for now, though.
NinjaRobotPirate (
talk) 17:54, 14 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Reduction in protection level: From extended protection to semi-protection.
Portbase (
talk) 12:25, 14 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last
8 days.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 12:31, 14 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Not done An identical request made by you was declined six days ago, and you have not supplied any reason why the protection should be weakened.
Favonian (
talk) 12:58, 14 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Another Bulls loss, another opportunity for the IPs/angry Bulls fans/amused fans of other teams to vandalize the page.
Zappa⚡Matic 03:51, 14 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Declined Edits are too old for protection. Ping me if it resumes.
Johnuniq (
talk) 06:15, 14 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 05:00, 14 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Protected by another admin.
Johnuniq (
talk) 06:16, 14 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. The module is not used in any articles so I did not protect indefinitely.
Johnuniq (
talk) 06:19, 14 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Previously protected, currently under a POV-pushing IP-hopper who is not content with establishing consensus on the talk page. I would recommend the revision at
[6] and allow the talk page to build consensus for further changes.
Ifnord (
talk) 21:03, 13 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Johnuniq (
talk) 06:00, 14 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. @
Migsmigss: I protected it but some of the other editors will still be able to edit. If it continues, post an explanation on article talk and ask the other editors to add their views there.
Johnuniq (
talk) 06:10, 14 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection:BLP policy violations – Looks like some IP vandalism and BLP violations the past few days. -- LuK3(Talk) 02:09, 14 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Johnuniq (
talk) 06:11, 14 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last
8 days.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 03:45, 14 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Johnuniq (
talk) 06:13, 14 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary full protection: Persistent vandalism.
DragoMynaa (
talk) 03:45, 13 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last
8 days.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 03:53, 13 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
MelanieN (
talk) 23:46, 13 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. User(s)
blocked.
GABgab 00:27, 14 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Pending changes protection: High level of IP and autoconfirmed users persistently vandalizing. Requesting 2 day pending change protection.
Porcelain katana (
talk) 00:22, 14 December 2019 (UTC)reply
I am requesting semi-protection.
This edit, with the bullshit edit summary "Reverting clear unreferenced BLP violation", and
this edit, with the bullshit edit summary "This is a serious BLP violation" were made using IP addresses used by a vile sockpuppetmaster, who has been wikistalking my contributions, for years, using IP addresses to evade an indefinite block.
Geo Swan (
talk) 03:00, 13 December 2019 (UTC)reply
@
Geo Swan: Shouldn't the sentence "Claude Bitton, the property speculator..." that the IP removed have a reference? I would find it hard to protect to stop an IP removing an unsourced statement about an identified living person.
Johnuniq (
talk) 09:41, 13 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Johnuniq, aren't indefinitely blocked contributors prohibited from using IP addresses for editing, even if those edits seem valid, or seem valid to a cursory inspection? Shouldn't we drop the assumption of good faith for individuals evading an indefinite block? This individual will keep making these disruptive edits, until the page is semi-protected. This individuals has
used close to one hundred different IP addresses to make hundreds of pointless disruptive edits to my contributions. Semi-protection is the only way to stop them.
If you think this particular edit has merit, you are an administrator, you can semi-protect the article, and then you and I can discuss your concern on
Talk:Rui Pereira (architect).
Geo Swan (
talk) 15:49, 13 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: IP vandalism, change the Bhayangkara names to Bhayangkara Lampung, this has happened before.
Wira rhea (
talk) 05:19, 13 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Applies to Bhayangkara F.C.
MelanieN (
talk) 23:51, 13 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Applies to 2020 Liga 1.
MelanieN (
talk) 23:51, 13 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Persistent vandalism, primarily by his die-hard fans and trolling haters who are equal in number. The vandalism happens mainly due to his popularity and will never end until he's forgotten. Kailash29792(talk) 05:28, 13 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk) 23:54, 13 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Persistent vandalism, primarily by his die-hard fans and trolling haters who are equal in number. The vandalism happens mainly due to his popularity and will never end until he's forgotten. Kailash29792(talk) 05:28, 13 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk) 23:57, 13 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection:Persistent
vandalism – Persistent recreation of an article that was AfDed and the result was a redirect.
Willbb234Talk (please {{
ping}} me in replies) 22:53, 14 December 2019 (UTC)
Sorry, ignore "Persistent vandalism" and replace with "Persistent disruptive editing". Thanks,
Willbb234Talk (please {{
ping}} me in replies) 22:55, 14 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
~Swarm~{sting} 21:57, 15 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: In the last day two IP vandals have changed link from "umbilical cable" to "umbilical cord," I suspect as the result of a recent Scott the Woz video making a joke about it - the video's new and I expect there'll be more in the near future. Would this be an appropriate situation for temporary semi-protection? Thanks.
Darthkayak (
talk) 01:39, 15 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
~Swarm~{sting} 22:02, 15 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Frequent addition of unsourced information to BLP by numerous IPs.
Egghead06 (
talk) 16:52, 15 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
~Swarm~{sting} 22:08, 15 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Editor keeps putting entry's on article that don't have their own article. Consensus is they must have an article. Editor was notified of this on his talk page but has ignored it.
...William, is the complaint department really on
the roof? 17:16, 15 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
~Swarm~{sting} 22:07, 15 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Recent large frequency of edits by random IPs, making unexplained/unref changes.
Dl2000 (
talk) 18:56, 15 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Johnuniq (
talk) 22:04, 15 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – 3 days, I'll look into the sock accusations if I can.
Doug Wellertalk 19:54, 15 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Johnuniq (
talk) 22:05, 15 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi:BLP policy violations – IP's keep adding a divorce claim on a not finalized divorce petition . - FlightTime Phone (
open channel) 20:09, 15 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Johnuniq (
talk) 22:06, 15 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Indefinite full protection High level of IP vandalism. Frequent vandalism from random IPs; have tried opening discussion on Talk page to no avail. This is a constant problem with this article due to one of the subject's political beliefs and has been going on for over a year
Lilipo25 (
talk) 20:16, 15 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Johnuniq (
talk) 22:08, 15 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – lots of various vandalism, (like making Mia Khalifa the principal).
Huldra (
talk) 21:44, 15 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
~Swarm~{sting} 22:09, 15 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary full protection: Repeated vandalism by registered user, removing valid information with claims of being "unsourced", then ignoring any attempt to point out the perfectly valid sources already there.
Cwmxii (
talk) 17:31, 15 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of
dispute resolution. The content removed has no inline citations and on (admittedly cursory) review appears to be
WP:OR, thus justifying removal. A quick check on both the user's Talk page and the article's Talk page fails to find any evidence of discussion. No 3RR has occurred.
Chetsford (
talk) 18:39, 15 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – The vast majority of edits are IP vandalism. The article title clearly makes it low-hanging fruit.
Pelliesh (
talk) 16:39, 15 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Recent vandalism is occurring at a slow enough cadence that the Pending Patrollers can handle it. If this changes, we should increase to semi-protection.
Chetsford (
talk) 18:42, 15 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – This article is frequently overwritten by very inexperienced editors with the contents of a new article they are trying to publish. Apparently they are confused by the name of this article.
MB 18:25, 15 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
sockpuppetry – Various IPs are being used to insert the same incorrect information to the page, and this has been going on for months now. It started with a user called "Иван Стефановски", who was blocked shortly after starting his shenanigans. See:
1 - support for Windows 7's 32-bit edition never stopped, and the "2012-07 Security Update" doesn't exist; the citations added here are fake links (yes, the user went through all that effort to make it look genuine). Since the block, there has been a slew of IPs inserting the same incorrect info over the past few months: see
2,
3,
4,
5.
By the way, I know that the page is already review-protected, but that's apparently not enough. See
6 and
7 as instances of times when the IPs' insertion of incorrect info got accepted by reviewers.
In my opinion, considering how unrelenting these IPs are, the page should be protected for a long while. --
Sek-2 (
talk) 18:58, 14 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Declined Pending changes is doing its job sufficiently. Anarchyte (
talk |
work) 08:36, 15 December 2019 (UTC)reply
But I literally linked examples of it not being enough... --
Sek-2 (
talk) 10:48, 15 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk) 11:47, 15 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism and moving of article without discussion by abusive user with political agenda --
BenBezuidenhout (
talk) 13:27, 15 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Fully protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. With two auto-confirmed users edit- and move-warring, this seems to be the only (temporary) solution. To the talk page!
Favonian (
talk) 14:34, 15 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
sockpuppetry – Please see Windows 7 above, the same situation is going on here too. See:
1,
2,
3,
4.
Sek-2 (
talk) 18:58, 14 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Declined Pending changes is fine. Anarchyte (
talk |
work) 08:37, 15 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Persistent vandalism by unregistered editors.
Dr. Hamza Ebrahim (
talk) 08:24, 15 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. Anarchyte (
talk |
work) 08:26, 15 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Repeated
WP:BLP violations – removal of sourced content and replacement with unsourced content and ignoring of Talk page message – by same IPv6 editor. It's clear they're going to keep doing this until the article is semi-protected. --
IJBall (
contribs •
talk) 20:14, 14 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection:
Disruptive editing over Dobrev's middle name. Basically, she said that the previous name listed, Konstantinova, was wrong and I added the correct one. If you read the talk page thread about her middle name, I explained how I got the correct one.
I even added a liner note edit saying to keep the correct name on Dec. 13, but some people are still changing it.
Kay girl 97 (
talk) 03:37, 15 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
sockpuppetry – Please see Windows 7 above. Examples of insertion of incorrect info:
1,
2,
3.
Sek-2 (
talk) 18:59, 14 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Anarchyte (
talk |
work) 08:25, 15 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Full protection: Persistent
vandalism – random ip's keep vandalising the page for no reason.
TheBigMan720 (
talk) 08:51, 15 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk) 09:36, 15 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Persistent vandalism by unregistered editors.
Molecule Extraction (
talk) 10:10, 14 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 05:53, 15 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection Same problem I had with the
Shine Championship, persistent
vandalism. An user deletes templates with different IPs. For example, since December 3, he vandaliced the Women's Championships in WWE 9 times. The WWE Womens Tag Team, since December 4, he vandaliced the article 7 times. --
HHH Pedrigree (
talk) 12:09, 14 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 05:53, 15 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: Persistent
sockpuppetry – Suspected misuse of multiple IP addresses which was already reported. Also continuous disruptive editing and edit warring in terms of
WP:SYNTHESIS.
LightKeyDarkBlade (
talk) 12:21, 14 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of
dispute resolution. –
bradv🍁 05:35, 15 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – After Bahrain won their first Gulf Cup this page has been continuously vandalized, (as the player was one of the scorers). I requested Protection in the past but after the protection expired the vandals add the same edits as before. Thus I think the page should be protected from Anonymous IP addresses to prevent further disruption and the destruction of accurate factual information.
Matix X2 (
talk) 14:04, 14 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of
dispute resolution. –
bradv🍁 05:36, 15 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Anarchyte (
talk |
work) 08:30, 15 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Anarchyte (
talk |
work) 08:33, 15 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Singh won the recently concluded
Miss World 2019 competition, and unconfirmed IPs as well as contributors with unsourced edits have started targeting the page.
Migsmigss (
talk) 18:04, 14 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Anarchyte (
talk |
work) 08:35, 15 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism and nonconstructive edits from IPs and new users. There have been two successive periods of temporary semi-protection, that both have ended with new accounts vandalising the page almost immediately (within a day or two, when I've checked).
GhostOfNoMeme (
talk) 22:08, 14 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Anarchyte (
talk |
work) 08:28, 15 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – Various IPs removing the name Kalimantan, claiming it is not the Indonesian name. Britannica says "Indonesians, however, use the word as a geographic term for the entire island."
https://www.britannica.com/place/Kalimantan Appears to be some sort of anti-Indonesian POV pushing. .
DuncanHill (
talk) 10:15, 14 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk) 03:40, 15 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Slow-burning edit war with an IP trying to force punctuation change and refusing to discuss it. If this could be protected for two weeks, that should suffice to make him forget to make his daily visits. Thanks
SchroCat (
talk) 11:55, 14 December 2019 (UTC)reply
It's an FA, and it doesn't use the serial comma at all in the rest of the article. It's the inconsistency and having standards v an edit warrior who can't be arsed to discuss the point on the talk page. -
SchroCat (
talk) 21:35, 14 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Funny, this article seems to need protection every December.
MelanieN (
talk) 03:45, 15 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – High volume disruption. At least 2 weeks of protection needed. — Vaibhavafro💬 14:39, 14 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
MelanieN (
talk) 03:49, 15 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: An IP-hopping anonymous editor has been editor-warring for several days to insert the idiosyncratic term "European-American", despite being reverted eight times by three editors. —
David Eppstein (
talk) 00:40, 15 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
— Maile (
talk) 01:35, 15 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Oppose (Non-administrator comment) not enough vandalism, nothing that the page watchers cant deal with. The subject was arrested yesterday, hence the interest. --DBigXrayᗙ 13:11, 16 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Lectonar (
talk) 13:39, 16 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – Non-stop disruptive edits, copyright violation, and edit warring by IP-hopper (looks like a block evasion case). IP(s) started disruption just after the end of previous page protection.
Wario-Man (
talk) 12:18, 16 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk) 13:37, 16 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Both.
Lectonar (
talk) 13:41, 16 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Declined 2 disruptive edits (by the same IP) in about a week are not enough for any form of protection.
Lectonar (
talk) 09:19, 16 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – The same user using different IPs is continuously trying to change the article with numbers that relate to a different plant and with incorrect use of the infobox parameters.
Ita140188 (
talk) 23:46, 15 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Lectonar (
talk) 07:35, 16 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Article has been hit by a vandalizing IP who deleted information consecutively. The IP was also engaged with an editing war with users who tried to reverse the vandalism. 祝好,
Josephua(
聊天) 00:06, 16 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – Lots and lots of IPs changing the redirect for no reason over long periods of time, always get reverted.
.
UnnamedUser (
talk) 02:29, 16 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Lectonar (
talk) 07:41, 16 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Persistent vandalism by various IPs resumed after end of last protection.
MB 04:52, 16 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Lectonar (
talk) 07:42, 16 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 10:14, 16 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Already protected.
Lectonar (
talk) 10:17, 16 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Vandalism starting back up since previous protection expired. -- LuK3(Talk) 22:21, 15 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 01:13, 16 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Already protected.
Lectonar (
talk) 07:36, 16 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection (require auto-confirmed access): persistent IP vandalism over several months as well as SPA account vandalism.
Octoberwoodland (
talk) 21:24, 15 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Declined only one recent vandal, who has not vandalized since being warned. Before that, the article has not been vandalized for several months.
~Swarm~{sting} 22:13, 15 December 2019 (UTC)reply
I just blocked the IP as their most recent edits going back some time were to play with that article.
Johnuniq (
talk) 22:15, 15 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
sockpuppetry – See Windows 7 above. This is a different case, though - I don't think there's been any obvious vandalism, but it's still being edited by the very same IPs that vandalize the other Windows articles, which is why I think this article should be protected too. See:
1,
2.
Sek-2 (
talk) 19:00, 14 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
SoWhy 21:43, 15 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
sockpuppetry – Continued from Gawli, also recently semi-protected for similar reasons.
Jalen Folf(talk) 22:17, 15 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
~Swarm~{sting} 22:21, 15 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Editing warring from a user who does not seem to understand
WP:V.
RF23 (
talk) 06:22, 17 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent
disruptive editing – This article is subjected to vandalism as the subject in consideration is making headlines. .
Abishe (
talk) 08:09, 17 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection.
Lectonar (
talk) 08:56, 17 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Continuing vandalism and BLP violations.
Chiswick Chap (
talk) 09:57, 17 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. One instance of disruptive editing in the last month.
Lectonar (
talk) 13:06, 17 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Indefinite extended confirmed: Persistent
vandalism – There are certain users doing mass removal of content. Please protect this page.
Sony R (
talk) 13:18, 17 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. The massive removal took place 5 weeks ago...
Lectonar (
talk) 13:22, 17 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – vandalism and it will be vandalized for some time by rival clubs. SAHA 14:52, 17 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk) 15:05, 17 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Declined Try using the {{
Edit extended-protected}} template on the talk-page to get more attention to it. I will decline this here for now, it needs more eyes.
Lectonar (
talk) 13:19, 17 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – The player was born in the US. A blocked IP continues to come to the article and change his nationality. A long lock would be appreciated.
Walter Görlitz (
talk) 19:09, 16 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – One of the user who edited the incorrect order of LTO licence plates to reduce protection level is editing the article disruptively.
Jon2guevarra (
talk) 02:22, 17 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Lectonar (
talk) 10:44, 17 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection and Move-protection: Need to protect from moving and editing this article from the IP.
ACQ322Acuity (
answer me) 05:07, 17 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. Why?
Lectonar (
talk) 10:45, 17 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection The featured article need to semi-protection.
ACQ322Acuity (
answer me) 05:35, 17 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. Why? Last edited December 12th.
Lectonar (
talk) 08:59, 17 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Persistent
vandalism – This article is subjected to vandalism as the subject in consideration is making headlines. Nation-wide protests in India ongoing under the backdrop of a law allegedly in violation of Article 14. Changes being made to spread misinformation. Request Full protection.
Samanvay.Agarwal (
talk) 08:34, 17 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last
8 days.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 08:47, 17 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
Lectonar (
talk) 08:56, 17 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Page was protected recently for a month for vandalism. A protection period of 3 months should suffice.
SurpriseandConquer (
talk) 09:08, 17 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Done Pending-changes protected by Oshwah.
Lectonar (
talk) 13:07, 17 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – IP hopping. Misleading edit summaries.
Grayfell (
talk) 09:25, 17 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 11:18, 17 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Already protected.
Lectonar (
talk) 13:05, 17 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Vandalism from multiple IPs over the last day or two.
Ionmars10 (
talk) 11:02, 17 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk) 13:09, 17 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Indefinite extended confirmed: Persistent
disruptive editing – The same user who requested admins to reduce protection level is editing the article disruptively.
Semsurî (
talk) 16:28, 16 December 2019 (UTC)reply
User(s)
blocked., not sure whether this is a sock.--
Ymblanter (
talk) 16:49, 16 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – The article has become the target of frequent vandalism, usually involving the "I have Osteoporosis" meme. One Blue Hat❯❯❯ (talk) 22:03, 16 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Declined@
One Blue Hat: The last vandalism was two weeks ago and few bad edits before that. That is not sufficient for protection.
Johnuniq (
talk) 04:24, 17 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 05:02, 17 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – Needs protection, anonymous IPs and random users are constantly trying to publish the article which violates
WP:CRYSTAL and
WP:TOOSOON since season starts until May 2020.
CycloneYoristalk! 19:47, 16 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Johnuniq (
talk) 04:22, 17 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 01:01, 17 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection:
On going vandalism. Request two week semi-protection due to current controversy in the news.
Msw1002 (
talk) 00:39, 17 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Johnuniq (
talk) 04:27, 17 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection:
On going vandalism. Request two week semi-protection due to current controversy in the news of the owner of Hallmark Channel.
Msw1002 (
talk) 00:44, 17 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Johnuniq (
talk) 04:28, 17 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Short-term IP vandalism. -- LuK3(Talk) 01:37, 17 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of three weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Johnuniq (
talk) 04:29, 17 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Politically motivated editing with no citations by 150.129.64.177. Spreading misinformation. Full protection requested for current version
Samanvay.Agarwal (
talk) 20:26, 16 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. —
Diannaa🍁 (
talk) 21:57, 16 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.. Certainly not enough to warrant indef pending.
EvergreenFir(talk) 19:28, 18 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Indefinite semi-protection:BLP policy violations – Vandalism has restarted following expiration of previous protection and likely won't stop given recent events.
Brojam (
talk) 21:05, 18 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Upping to one month this time.
Malcolmxl5 (
talk) 21:28, 18 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Unprotection: The page has very little vandalism and the collateral damage of protection is very high, the article is hardly getting any updates today even though there are many updates in the news. We really want IPs to edit this article. I along with several others are hawkishly watching this article for vandalism. Hence I support removing all protection from this. At the very least give EC rights to
User:Pali Upadhyay who has been very helpful in updating the article and now he is locked out and has to write tonnes of text on talk page to get obvious edits done. (also ping
El C) . DBigXrayᗙ Happy Holidays! 15:42, 18 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Note: Sounds good to me. -- Deepfriedokra 15:59, 18 December 2019 (UTC)reply
No
DFO, since I don't know if he is online or when he will be back. I dropped a note on his talk page though. Posted here so that others can take action.--DBigXrayᗙ Happy Holidays! 16:25, 18 December 2019 (UTC)reply
We really want IPs to edit this article — I'm not the one who restricted IPs from editing the article. That was
Lectonar a few hours earlier. I just prevented two non-EC editors from edit warring — so rather than lock the article to everyone else by fully protecting, I applied EC. I'm not sure if Pali Upadhyay should be rewarded with EC user rights after edit warring (although, in fairness, they only reverted once). A way out of this might be to just apply
1RR (not including the reversion of IPs). I will look into that monetarily.
El_C 17:58, 18 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Also, note that in the
actual request, Lectonar set the duration of the semi to three days, but they fixed the actual duration to indefinite. I simply upgraded the protection without touching the date parameter.
El_C 18:03, 18 December 2019 (UTC)reply
El_C thanks for removing the protection. The IPs can now edit so I am happy. This is a controversial article so some amount of reverting should be allowed to accommodate the difference in POV and editorial discretion. Indeed there was only one revert and the 1RR restriction was really uncalled for IMHO. An edit war template to both should have sufficed, for now and 1RR should have been delayed until things really escalated. the EC right for the user is no longer needed now that the protection is off. --DBigXrayᗙ Happy Holidays! 18:25, 18 December 2019 (UTC) updated on 21:14, 18 December 2019 (UTC)reply
There were three reverts in that edit war. Let's see how it goes, for now. Everything can always be reset. Obviously, there was a problem with IP disruption, otherwise the request would neither have been made nor later approved by Lectonar.
El_C 18:30, 18 December 2019 (UTC)reply
The thing about "discretion" I don't accept is that both editors kept writing "use the talk page" in their edit summaries, but neither of them used the talk page once. No, one revert (of logged in users) is fine, for now.
El_C 18:33, 18 December 2019 (UTC)reply
El_C Please accept my apology, I stand corrected. The reverts were muddied due to other parallel changes.
The IP disruption was minimal as compared to other edits and YMMV but IMHO wasn't enough to merit a protection only for the IPs.
Yes, it was bad behavior. Both are new editors and I have left talk page messages for both of them to heed to. Hopefully this should not repeat. Lets see how it goes. --DBigXrayᗙ Happy Holidays! 21:14, 18 December 2019 (UTC)reply
@
DBigXray: not at all. Please keep me updated, at any case.
El_C 21:18, 18 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Sure will keep you updated. Thanks for being proactive and handling this request promptly--DBigXrayᗙ Happy Holidays! 21:25, 18 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. If it continues (which it likely will), indef semi makes sense.
EvergreenFir(talk) 19:25, 18 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection:BLP policy violations – I'm seeing long-term BLP violations, specifically related to the birthday and nationality. -- LuK3(Talk) 17:57, 18 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Favonian (
talk) 18:35, 18 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Unprotection: The page has very little vandalism and the collateral damage of protection is very high, the article is hardly getting any updates today even though there are many updates in the news. We really want IPs to edit this article. I along with several others are hawkishly watching this article for vandalism. Hence I support removing all protection from this. At the very least give EC rights to
User:Pali Upadhyay who has been very helpful in updating the article and now he is locked out and has to write tonnes of text on talk page to get obvious edits done. (also ping
El C) . DBigXrayᗙ Happy Holidays! 15:42, 18 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Note: Sounds good to me. -- Deepfriedokra 15:59, 18 December 2019 (UTC)reply
No
DFO, since I don't know if he is online or when he will be back. I dropped a note on his talk page though. Posted here so that others can take action.--DBigXrayᗙ Happy Holidays! 16:25, 18 December 2019 (UTC)reply
We really want IPs to edit this article — I'm not the one who restricted IPs from editing the article. That was
Lectonar a few hours earlier. I just prevented two non-EC editors from edit warring — so rather than lock the article to everyone else by fully protecting, I applied EC. I'm not sure if Pali Upadhyay should be rewarded with EC user rights after edit warring (although, in fairness, they only reverted once). A way out of this might be to just apply
1RR (not including the reversion of IPs). I will look into that monetarily.
El_C 17:58, 18 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Also, note that in the
actual request, Lectonar set the duration of the semi to three days, but they fixed the actual duration to indefinite. I simply upgraded the protection without touching the date parameter.
El_C 18:03, 18 December 2019 (UTC)reply
El_C thanks for removing the protection. The IPs can now edit so I am happy. This is a controversial article so some amount of reverting should be allowed to accommodate the difference in POV and editorial discretion. Indeed there was only one revert and the 1RR restriction was really uncalled for IMHO. An edit war template to both should have sufficed, for now and 1RR should have been delayed until things really escalated. the EC right for the user is no longer needed now that the protection is off. --DBigXrayᗙ Happy Holidays! 18:25, 18 December 2019 (UTC)reply
There were three reverts in that edit war. Let's see how it goes, for now. Everything can always be reset. Obviously, there was a problem with IP disruption, otherwise the request would neither have been made nor later approved by Lectonar.
El_C 18:30, 18 December 2019 (UTC)reply
The thing about "discretion" I don't accept is that both editors kept writing "use the talk page" in their edit summaries, but neither of them used the talk page once. No, one revert (of logged in users) is fine, for now.
El_C 18:33, 18 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Declined –
Warn the user appropriately then report them to
AIV or
ANI if they continue. Same IP in the last few days, better to block them than protect the page for all IPs.
Lectonar (
talk) 09:18, 18 December 2019 (UTC)reply
I have added the page to my watchlist.
Lectonar (
talk) 13:06, 18 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Declined Jimbo prefers his userpage to stay unprotected if disruption is not too great ("You can edit this page"). If at all, we protect for some hours. Last disruption was about one week ago.
Lectonar (
talk) 15:04, 18 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – The article has been vandalised multiple times since the expiry of the previous duration of protection.
LefcentrerightTalk(plz ping) 13:31, 18 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra 13:53, 18 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Anonymous from different IPs keeps adding unreferenced information and disrupting infobox. Already requested page protection and denied due to insufficient activity. However it has been more than a month that I am reverting on average once a day. This is becoming really annoying and pointless. Please help.
Ita140188 (
talk) 13:46, 18 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last
8 days.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 13:52, 18 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra 13:55, 18 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – Persistent Removal of the redirect and copy pasting content from the target article. There are already several IPs and accounts involved. 94rainTalk 13:29, 18 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra 13:47, 18 December 2019 (UTC)reply
User(s)
blocked. -- Deepfriedokra 13:44, 18 December 2019 (UTC):Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra 13:44, 18 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Gothic chess article has been added over the redirect, and reverted at least five times I think by different editors. The article is insufficiently referenced and slightly promotional. A request has made by another editor to not overwrite the redirect. . scope_creepTalk 20:42, 17 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Note: The edit warrior is not extended confirmed, so FP is not needed. I am messaging user regarding some issues. -- Deepfriedokra 21:30, 17 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Requesting immediate archiving...Lectonar (
talk) 11:50, 18 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: IP vandalism.
Sherenk1 (
talk) 05:11, 18 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk) 09:20, 18 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Automated comment:@
Lectonar: One or more pages in this request have not been protected.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 11:21, 18 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Done Protection upped by El_C.
Lectonar (
talk) 11:24, 18 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – Too much trolling and nonsense going on.
Semsurî (
talk) 20:49, 17 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of
dispute resolution. This is between you and one IP; either use dispute resolution, or report the IP to
AIV for obvious vandalism.
Lectonar (
talk) 07:27, 18 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – News has just come out today that the person the article is on, was violent and abusive to his wife. Been vandalized once and maybe crystal but expect more over the next few days. NZFC(talk)(cont) 21:38, 17 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
sockpuppetry – Persistent editing by sock-hopping anonymous editor. livelikemusictalk! 04:07, 18 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Should be enough for now.
Lectonar (
talk) 09:17, 18 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Reduction in protection level: the last protection move was 4 years ago. The protection template should be removed.
Marcel Schelzer (
talk) 03:42, 18 December 2019 (UTC)reply
This template is protected in accordance with the guidelines for
high risk templates so that only administrators or template editors may edit it. I do not see a need to change that. --
Malcolmxl5 (
talk) 06:14, 18 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., the article is not edited so frequently, and there are good edits from non-autoconfirmed users, so that pending changes seems to be the best solution--
Ymblanter (
talk) 08:28, 18 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Indefinite pending changes: Persistent
vandalism – Long-term repeated target of vandalism/non-NPOV edits, typically to remove or change content that describes it as pseudoscience/alternative medicine. Hoping PC protection curbs this, though semi-protection may be a reasonable option in this case.
Erakura(talk) 03:36, 18 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. + Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk) 09:02, 18 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Currently PC protected, but as the film's release date is approaching there has been vandalism from IPs and new users. They are adding unsourced contents and spam links to the article.
Tolly4bolly 07:08, 18 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Pending-changes overwhelmed....
Lectonar (
talk) 07:25, 18 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – ECP in draft space and article space seems right. It may be notable, but a neutral editor can work it.
Robert McClenon (
talk) 16:48, 17 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Move protected for a period of X, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra 17:21, 17 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Full protection: I don't want anyone messing with my userpage.
James The Bond 007 (
talk) 22:30, 17 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Declined. User pages are automatically protected from editing by unconfirmed and IP users using an an edit filter. Other than that, user pages are not automatically or pre-emptively protected, they may only be protected if a need exist and I don’t see that here. See
WP:UPPROT.
Malcolmxl5 (
talk) 00:34, 18 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 03:35, 18 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP disruptive editing.
Magitroopa (
talk) 05:39, 17 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection.
Lectonar (
talk) 13:04, 17 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
sockpuppetry – Ongoing IP sockpuppetry.
VQuakr (
talk) 21:21, 17 December 2019 (UTC)reply
User(s)
blocked., I do not see any sockpuppetry, I just see one IP who was edit-warring after warnings--
Ymblanter (
talk) 21:25, 17 December 2019 (UTC)reply
(Non-administrator comment) I don't see any recent vandalism to this article.
Interstellarity (
talk) 19:01, 17 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Question: Does the OP mean all of Wikipedia?
Favonian (
talk) 19:32, 17 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. Sigh! I rather liked the alternative interpretation.
Favonian (
talk) 20:36, 17 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. Already semi-protected and that seems sufficient.
Malcolmxl5 (
talk) 16:39, 19 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Pending changes: Persistent
disruptive editing – IP edits for the past two years or so consist almost exclusively of people removing sourced references to Kurdish cuisine, claiming the dish belongs exclusively to Turkey.
IamNotU (
talk) 19:13, 19 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: Presistent
vandalism - Requesting temporary protection, many IPs are interfering with our edits, please lock it temporarily, I suggest AFTER January 2020. It is irritating to undo their edits.
WildEric19 (
talk) 17:43, 19 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
El_C 17:55, 19 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Talk page of an impeached politician. Lots of vandalism and trolling going on, such as
here,
here, and
here. ωικιωαrrιorᑫᑫ1ᑫ 17:48, 19 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of one day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
El_C 17:53, 19 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Persistent vandalism and edit warring from unregistered users altering the wording and adding links to character page despite it not being confirmed to be an adaptation of the said character.
Trailblazer101 (
talk) 13:45, 19 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Fully protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Content dispute. Anarchyte (
talk |
work) 15:09, 19 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Disruptive editing. While one can block the user, they'll likely try again with another IP (they have, before).
Crboyer (
talk) 06:16, 19 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection Yet another target of the same block-evading vandal that likes to target Charlie's Angels, Elle Ramirez, and others.
PohranicniStraze (
talk) 06:52, 19 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Indefinite full protection: Persistent
vandalism – Persistent vandalism.
Platflyer (
talk) 14:58, 18 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Already done by administrator Stwalkerster.. I don't see anything that would warrant indef, let alone full protection.
EvergreenFir(talk) 19:27, 18 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Automated comment:@
Swarm: One or more pages in this request have not been protected.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 00:08, 19 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Editwarring / failure to comply with 1RR-rule by IP. The Bannertalk 03:13, 19 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Declined IP has stopped after warning; report to AiV if they pick up.
Lectonar (
talk) 07:25, 19 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last
8 days.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 05:24, 19 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Yes, but there are subtle vandalism going on, for example: Edits and addition of unsourced details, as could be seen
here,
here, and
here, and the use of false information in a source, to back up the claim that the title "Miss Universe Philippines" was first used in 2012, but upon inspection, there wasn't any content in said source that says so, as could be seen
in this edit and
source used. Thanks.
Migsmigss (
talk) 05:36, 19 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Lectonar (
talk) 09:37, 19 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Persistent vandalism over last several days by multiple IPs.
userdude 03:48, 19 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 05:09, 19 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Already protected.
Lectonar (
talk) 08:43, 19 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection:Vandalism has started on the newly announced Survivor season and will likely continue throughout the week. At least 1 week will be good and then we can request longer if needed.
Jayab314 03:59, 19 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 05:09, 19 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Already protected.
Lectonar (
talk) 08:43, 19 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Seasonal IP vandalism.
UW Dawgs (
talk) 04:08, 19 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 05:09, 19 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Already protected.
Lectonar (
talk) 08:44, 19 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Long term semi-protection: This BLP of someone relatively unknown is a target of a persistent lame troll or someone with a grudge with the subject.
[7] While the current IP is blocked, the IP is hopping enough that it's likely they will be back. It's irregular but a clear BLP vio and given the subject is fairly unknown, I don't think we can guarantee we will get to it fast, e.g. it lasted several weeks in October
[8]. Her sister's article is affected
[9] by the same editor and was recently protected
[10]. I should also mention that this has been going on for over a year even if the IP seemed to stop for a long time
[11].
Nil Einne (
talk) 04:10, 19 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. And watchlisted by yours truly.
Lectonar (
talk) 08:45, 19 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary Semi-protection: Moderate level of IP edit warring over an unsourced addition to a BLP.
Oska (
talk) 01:46, 19 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Anarchyte (
talk |
work) 02:55, 19 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary Semi-protection: High risk of continued vandalism by supporters and opponents of US impeachment vote, as this House rep was 1 of 2 who voted against impeachment on article 1. There have already been multiple vandalism edits within the past hour, although they appear to have been removed from the edit history somehow. The edit I recall seeing edited the first sentence to state "Collin Clark Peterson (born June 29, 1944) is a swinish American politician".
TheNavigatrr (
talk) 01:54, 19 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary Semi-protection: There is a high risk of vandalism in the next few hours/days by supporters and opponents of the US impeachment vote, as this House rep was the only one to vote "present" on impeachment (both votes).
TheNavigatrr (
talk) 01:59, 19 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary Semi-protection: There is a high risk of vandalism in the next few hours/days by supporters and opponents of the US impeachment vote, as this person was 1 of 2 House Democrats to vote "no" on impeachment Article 1.
TheNavigatrr (
talk) 01:59, 19 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary Semi-protection: There is a high risk of vandalism in the next few hours/days by supporters and opponents of the US impeachment vote, as this person was the only House Democrats to vote "no" on impeachment Article 2.
TheNavigatrr (
talk) 01:59, 19 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: Continuous vandalism from an IP hopping vandal in the 120.29.xxx.xxx range since November. -
WayKurat (
talk) 01:15, 19 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 01:39, 19 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Persistent vandalous edits pertaining to the impeachment of Donald Trump over the last half an hour. —
Katie <3 (
talk) 02:13, 19 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
El_C 02:17, 19 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Indefinite extended confirmed: Persistent
sockpuppetry – Bio is being edited by the subject herself or accomplices - one ID is Charcom1 - to remove any critical content. One edit even says "The information now provided is coming directly from Char Margolis office.".
RobP (
talk) 06:00, 18 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: High(?) level of IP vandalism, which sometimes stay for days
8ya (
talk) 01:39, 19 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
El_C 01:41, 19 December 2019 (UTC)reply
I think that a temporary protection might not be enough, considering the vandalism has been over the span over several months.
8ya (
talk) 01:49, 19 December 2019 (UTC)reply
If it doesn't work, please free to relist. We don't ordinarily start with indefinite protection on an article that only has been protected once, in 2014, that's well outside convention.
El_C 01:53, 19 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: Rising level of politically motivated editing by IPs (pro and anti–trump) due to passage in the NDAA. Disruptive political motivated edits are likely to rise significantly after the NDAA is signed later this week..
Garuda28 (
talk) 16:30, 18 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Page is currently pending changes protection but has been heavily vandalism by IPs and new users. The vandalism has reached a level of frequency where it will be much more effective just to semi-protect the page. Shouldn't be collateral damage, as the IP and new user edits from recent times have all been reverted.
Hog Farm (
talk) 23:02, 18 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Note: I SP'd the thing befire it was moved to
Rey (Star Wars). Now it is move protected as well -- Deepfriedokra 23:22, 18 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – This is a current event and it is not getting much attention from logged-in editors. There are probably only one to three editors who have this page in their watchlist in addition to me. IPs have been doing tests, vandalism, disruptive edits and without edit summaries. The topic is controversial and requires protection as well as attention.--
SharabSalam (
talk) 12:02, 20 December 2019 (UTC).
SharabSalam (
talk) 12:02, 20 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Note: Did we not have a request two days ago to lift protection to allow editing?
Malcolmxl5 (
talk) 13:51, 20 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Yes;
El C put it under 1RR. ~ Amory(
u •
t •
c) 19:08, 20 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Declined. Some disruption (and a block) by non-confirmed users today, but I think we are managing.
El_C 19:12, 20 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Full-protection: Edit warring over inclusion of Donald Trump's impeachment. None of cited sources mention Home Alone 2: Lost in New York, and Trump's cameo in this film had nothing to do with his being impeached.
NedFausa (
talk) 21:08, 20 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk) 21:18, 20 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection With Trump's impeachment last night, there appears to be a minor edit war on whether to include this information on the page. However, Trump's impeachment is unrelated to Johnson's impeachment.
Jrdburrow (
talk) 21:23, 19 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Declined Doesn't seem to have persisted ~ Amory(
u •
t •
c) 18:43, 20 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection., disruptive edits are infrequent, not all Ip edits have been reverted--
Ymblanter (
talk) 18:59, 20 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. Doesn't seem persistent, with only a couple instances today and yesterday all that's happened in a month. ~ Amory(
u •
t •
c) 18:47, 20 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: "Christianity Today" published and editorial criticizing the President of the United states, which has inspired acts of
vandalism today. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Sleeplessp (
talk •
contribs) 18:30, 20 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. Only a couple of acts so far. ~ Amory(
u •
t •
c) 18:42, 20 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Article was recently temporarily semi-protected due to an IP hopper. The IP hopper has returned to edit war over "an adult" wording.
Flyer22 Reborn (
talk) 05:38, 20 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Long term still required a year and a half of on-again-off-again semi protection, so let's try a lengthy bout of semiprotection. I'd be inclined to suggest if there aren't a ton of meaningful edit requests, that it should just be indefinitely semiprotected. ~ Amory(
u •
t •
c) 19:05, 20 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – a ip user continuously removed content with reliable source on this article. -Nahal(T) 18:46, 20 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk) 18:54, 20 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Indefinite create protection: The page should not exist, and is in the same venue as in
This page does not exist and
Like this one. This RPP is to make sure the page is not badly created.
Plankhouse0 (
talk) 19:05, 19 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. Never been edited, come back when there’s evidence of a problem.
Malcolmxl5 (
talk) 00:17, 20 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary Semi-protection: Constant edit wars and vandalism.--
NL19931993 (
talk) 00:02, 20 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Declined Last edit by an unregistered (or non-autoconfirmed) editor was 02:38, 18 December 2019, nearly two days ago.
Malcolmxl5 (
talk) 00:23, 20 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: This is a Good Article... somehow. Yet IPs CONSTANTLY come here disrupting and vandalizing any and everything especially regarding her nationality and ethnicity.
Trillfendi (
talk) 14:42, 19 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. It's already pending changes protected, and the frequency of disruption isn't high enough to warrant semi-protection. I have watchlisted.
Lectonar (
talk) 14:48, 19 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -
David Gerard (
talk) 17:54, 21 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. - giving it six months as this is the second time this has been needed -
David Gerard (
talk) 17:56, 21 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 02:18, 21 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Indefinite extended confirmed: Persistent
disruptive editing – A certain IP made multiple disruptive edits and made mass removal of content. So, please protect the page.
Sony R (
talk) 11:58, 21 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Description of him as "left wing" being persistently inserted today following Twitter attack by Trump. No supporting evidence, purely political. BLP
KD Tries Again (
talk) 14:50, 20 December 2019 (UTC)KD Tries Againreply
Declined looks like there are a few eyes on this one and the IP got blocked. We can revisit if ongoing issue.
Cas Liber (
talk·contribs) 11:06, 21 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Pending changes: Persistent
vandalism – Quite a lot of IP vandalism in the past half year; had to revert an uncaught vandalism, and often there would be reversions of vandalism that are days late.
Qwertyxp2000 (
talk |
contribs) 03:31, 21 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of
unsourced or poorly sourced content – A single person in the shape of several IP's and at least one user have kept making the same unsourced edit for quite some time now. Page should be protected to hinder further disruption and warring! .
Vif12vf/Tiberius (
talk) 14:45, 21 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary Semi-protection: Recent increase in persistent
Block Evasion from
User:Leon103102 through IPs based in Palo Alto since the page was last unprotected just under a month ago. Suggest longer semi-protection (e.g two to three months).
Coastie43 (
talk) 03:04, 21 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk) 13:03, 21 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Single dates very frequently get changed by IPs against the source provided. dannymusiceditoroops 20:44, 20 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. - should probably be longer next time if it continues after that -
David Gerard (
talk) 12:26, 21 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – An IP user has removed too many words in the article. -Nahal(T) 22:17, 20 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -
David Gerard (
talk) 12:28, 21 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – Disruptive IP editor returning to this article. Ravensfire (
talk) 07:32, 21 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. - giving it six months as this is the third time this has been needed - if it resumes again after that, the next should probably be indefinite -
David Gerard (
talk) 12:34, 21 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – getting hit with vandalism over the last couple of days, individuals labelling this a propoganda or fake news channel.
Agent00x (
talk) 12:26, 21 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. - should probably make the next one longer if the disruption resumes after that -
David Gerard (
talk) 12:30, 21 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Random IPs and editors are editing same image caption to distinguish an expedition member from a penguin. Reverted a dozen time or more.
Fama Clamosa (
talk) 19:46, 20 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —
Diannaa🍁 (
talk) 12:12, 21 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Persistent addition of
unsourced cast members by a large number of IPs. Edit warring by the IPs and various new/SPA accounts.
The Mirror Cracked (
talk) 19:56, 20 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —
Diannaa🍁 (
talk) 12:14, 21 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 01:18, 21 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Already protected by administrator Kudpung. Protected till March 2020. —
Diannaa🍁 (
talk) 12:17, 21 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: IP is removing columns from the table and won't explain why. I don't think it's vandalism, but his might force him to engage.
Argento Surfer (
talk) 18:39, 20 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -
David Gerard (
talk) 11:20, 21 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – a ip user removed multiple article content. -Nahal(T) 22:12, 20 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. (for now) -
David Gerard (
talk) 11:28, 21 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – Most IP edits are POV pushing, pending changes protection is not working. –
UnnamedUser (
talk;
contribs) 22:54, 20 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – an ip editor has continuously removed word on article and wrong info add here, previous protected already expired. -Nahal(T) 23:58, 20 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Seconded - I'd protect it myself, but I'm editing -
David Gerard (
talk) 00:26, 21 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 03:03, 21 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Nate Speed once again.
FilmandTVFan28 (
talk) 00:38, 21 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 03:03, 21 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Seems to be good faith, but the IPs have competency issues and keep inserting wording with NPOV problems. Has just issued a potential legal threat against me.
[12] Alivardi (
talk) 13:52, 20 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 22:32, 20 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Protected by another admin; semi seems appropriate.
Johnuniq (
talk) 10:13, 21 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 09:05, 21 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Already protected.
ST47 (
talk) 10:32, 21 December 2019 (UTC)reply
It's true that editors are not providing proper edit summaries, but it's also possible that IP disruption has been ongoing for a long time. Any thoughts from other admins on whether it should be full or semi protection?
Johnuniq (
talk) 10:00, 21 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. on the basis of possible IP socking.
ST47 (
talk) 10:29, 21 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism and misuse of editing etiquette and wrong information. Four months at maximum.
Lemonreader (
talk) 12:01, 20 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Johnuniq (
talk) 09:58, 21 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of
unsourced or poorly sourced content – Added unsourced Petrolite twice now over redirect in as many weeks. Likely to create it again. scope_creepTalk 16:40, 20 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. we can revisit this later.
Cas Liber (
talk·contribs)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Persistent IP activity, about once each day, adding link spam. VelellaVelella Talk 09:05, 21 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Johnuniq (
talk) 10:02, 21 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection Disruption. Article keeps getting unsourced statements and listings by new editors who just put any person on this list whom they personally like. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
2402:3a80:88d:aeb5:1183:5d1b:2285:f77a (
talk •
contribs) 09:36, 21 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Johnuniq (
talk) 09:50, 21 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
sockpuppetry – Target of MariaJaydHicky socks, who immediately began genrewarring at the article as soon as the last round of semi-protection expired.
Aoi (青い) (
talk) 04:22, 20 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Johnuniq (
talk) 04:22, 21 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Persistent disruptive changes to current club (among other vandalism); page was recently protected from 10-17 December, but vandalism continues now that it's unprotected again.
Felida97 (
talk) 11:43, 20 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Johnuniq (
talk) 04:23, 21 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Indefinite semi-protection:BLP policy violations – There has been years of unsourced additions and vandalism to this article. Enough is enough. We can save a lot contributor's time by placing this page under indefinite semi protection. ---
C&
C (
Coffeeandcrumbs) 01:41, 20 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. If needed please report again with a brief explanation about why recent IP edits are a BLP violation.
Johnuniq (
talk) 04:06, 21 December 2019 (UTC)reply
User(s)
blocked. All but one of the disruptive edits was performed by an IP that has now been blocked. No fresh instances today, please relist if the vandalism restarts.
Kosack (
talk) 14:57, 22 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. - there's some content disputes going on, but they've reached a point that requires protection. Vandalism didn't seem recent and there's significant positive edits by IPs so don't want to SP unless necessary.
Nosebagbear (
talk) 16:32, 22 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. and -
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. clearly needs protection, but didn't seem to warrant an immediate jump all the way to indef SP protection,
Nosebagbear (
talk) 16:36, 22 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 23:53, 21 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 07:10, 22 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
sockpuppetry – There is a editor who is using multiple accounts for disruptive editing, like changing the infobox's format that is against
WP:MOS and adding unsourced recording dates for unexplained reasons.
TheAmazingPeanuts (
talk) 21:48, 21 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Automated comment:@
TheAmazingPeanuts: This request cannot be parsed. Please ensure it follows formatting consistent with the current or previous methods of submission.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 03:54, 22 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -
David Gerard (
talk) 16:17, 22 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
sockpuppetry – There is a editor who is using multiple accounts for disruptive editing, like changing the infobox's format that is against
WP:MOS and adding unsourced recording dates for unexplained reasons.
TheAmazingPeanuts (
talk) 21:57, 21 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -
David Gerard (
talk) 16:19, 22 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. - if the plan stays in force, I'd anticipate the vandalism (and unsourced edits, etc etc) to continue, but we'll go with a week to start
Nosebagbear (
talk) 16:28, 22 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Repetitive addition of unsourced content by IPs in different ranges. Same content was being added at
Quantity theory of money, which is now semiprotected until January 10. Please protect this one to match. Thanks!.
MrOllie (
talk) 12:36, 22 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk) 15:42, 22 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: The usual - nationality warring by IPs. Suggest making this stick for a bit longer, because it comes up every two months like clockwork... Elmidae (
talk ·
contribs) 03:32, 22 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 03:54, 22 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Already protected by administrator Drmies.
Kosack (
talk) 15:11, 22 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of
unsourced or poorly sourced content – Unsourced content added by IP and new users likely the same person. Created for that purpose only. .
Fylindfotberserk (
talk) 19:19, 21 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk) 11:59, 22 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Lots of vandalism in the last 30 minutes for some reason. Possibly related to the FIFA World Cup?
Davepeta (
talk) 19:34, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
There's no point in trying to fix this until it's protected, it just gets vandalized again. Apparently it's being done by
Liverpool fans? I wouldn't know. Someone also added actual content with some subtle vandalism included, and someone decided not to revert that.
Davepeta (
talk) 19:57, 21 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 21:53, 21 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Already protected by administrator Alexf.--
Ymblanter (
talk) 12:00, 22 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – protected in the past was expired. -Nahal(T) 22:29, 21 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Looks like COI disruptions, over the same Controversy section, since 2018. Six previous short-term protections just since July 2019.
— Maile (
talk) 12:10, 22 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Controversial current event. Vandalized 6 times in last 24 hours.
userdude 03:53, 22 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
— Maile (
talk) 11:50, 22 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last
8 days.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 10:41, 22 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection., unless you count your own edits as wandalism--
Ymblanter (
talk) 19:47, 23 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – Disruptive IP editor keeps removing part of the article that they obviously dont like. 🎄Awker22🎄 (
Happy Hoildays!) 19:13, 23 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing from suspected socks. Not the first occurrence.
Sachin96700(
talk) 04:54, 23 December2019(UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection., I do not see anything like this in the recent history--
Ymblanter (
talk) 19:48, 23 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Nationalist vandalism about her nationality.
{ [ ( jjj1238 ) ] } 21:25, 22 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last
8 days.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 21:30, 22 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra 20:20, 23 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Persistent IP vandalism going on for the last week or so.
BastunĖġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ! 21:27, 22 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: Lengthy semi protection please due to addition of unsourced or poorly sourced fringe conspiracy theory. Previously protected many times for this reason.
92.40.176.8 (
talk) 22:10, 22 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 11:35, 23 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: Persistent addition of
unsourced or poorly sourced content – Constant unsourced/poorly sourced episode titles by IPs for popular upcoming season. -- /
Alex/
21 22:34, 22 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent
disruptive editing – There's been an edit war for a few days between an IP user (or several from the same range) and one autoconfirmed editor, hence I'm requesting ECP. Apparently the order in which the actors are listed is a Big Deal. bonadeacontributionstalk 10:44, 21 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 19:59, 22 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Indefinite move protection: This article is a hoax, and was previously Wikispaced as such. It was moved away from the hoax page, I have moved it back. It should not be moved again without community consensus, and some move protection will ensure that.
Captain EekEdits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 17:48, 23 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Actually, because it's a hoax, it and it's talk page should both be indef full protected.
Captain EekEdits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 17:55, 23 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Fully protected – I applied move protection and have indef protected the article itself. Unclear why we would protect the talk page, which might be used to help document the hoax. Note there is a currently a redirect at
Livi Zheng which points to
Brush with Danger. No objection if another admin wants to protect the redirect to deter recreation of the hoax.
EdJohnston (
talk) 18:08, 23 December 2019 (UTC)reply
EdJohnston, Oops a misreading of the hoax guidelines on my part, they say protect "both pages" which I initially read as the page and it's talk, but now realize means the hoax page and the original mainspace title.
Captain EekEdits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 18:18, 23 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Can you link to anywhere it says that the original hoax page name should be protected?
EdJohnston (
talk) 18:23, 23 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Jo-Jo Eumerus (
talk) 18:58, 23 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – IP hopper repeatedly changing first line of summary without giving reason for edits.
GimmeChoco44 (
talk) 09:39, 23 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk) 11:52, 23 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Multiple IPs making disruptive edits, breaking infobox.
Eostrix (
talk) 11:38, 23 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk) 11:49, 23 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing from suspected socks. Not the first occurrence.
GhostOfDanGurney (
talk) 09:16, 22 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk) 09:01, 23 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent
vandalism – way too many vandals. ∼∼∼∼
Eric0928Talk 17:11, 22 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. Only two disruptive edits this week. Not an awful lot of clear vandalism this month either.
Kosack (
talk) 07:48, 23 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Persistent IP vandalism.
Ben MacLeod (
talk) 01:34, 23 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last
8 days.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 01:46, 23 December 2019 (UTC)reply
It was denied because the IP was banned. So the user just jumped to another IP and vandalised the page again.
Ben MacLeod (
talk) 06:17, 23 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
El_C 06:51, 23 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary Semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism - Page vandalism. Section Reception is undergoing an edit war between users, with certain users consistently using the section to personally attack a critic for a review.
WhoKnew99 (
talk) 16:37, 22 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
El_C 08:35, 23 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Ip's have immediately picked up with the prior edit-warring two days after protection expired. --
Ronz (
talk) 23:26, 21 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Serious issues of vandalism by multiple IPs and socks.
Gotitbro (
talk) 03:52, 22 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last
8 days.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 03:54, 22 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk) 08:30, 23 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Persistent vandalism by multiple IPs and socks.
Gotitbro (
talk) 03:54, 22 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last
8 days.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 03:54, 22 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk) 08:31, 23 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Continued addition by various IPs that series has ended, which is unsourced and cannot seem to be verified. -- /
Alex/
21 06:01, 22 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk) 08:34, 23 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: IP disruption.
SNUGGUMS (
talk /
edits) 03:30, 22 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. Disruption coming from the same IP, which is now blocked for a week.
Risker (
talk) 04:09, 23 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Vandalism by socks and by unrelated accounts. Most of the edits occured right after the page was unprotected.
SurpriseandConquer (
talk) 01:57, 23 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 03:32, 23 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Extended confirmed protection: Persistent
vandalism – Persistent IP vandalism and addition of unsourced content. The page was recently protected from December 20–22 UTC but vandalism has resumed.
Rosalina2427(talk to me) 02:16, 23 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
El_C 06:49, 23 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – AE-Enforcement already filed to no effect. The Bannertalk 00:54, 23 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last
8 days.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 01:01, 23 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Fully protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
El_C 06:41, 23 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Persistent inclusion of unsourced info by IP.
Blackknight12 (
talk) 02:23, 23 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
El_C 06:47, 23 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary pending changes: Persistent
vandalism – Continued attempts to add a hoax to the article. Majority of accounts editing the article are sockpuppets of
BillyNorth, and single-purpose to continue adding the false information.
Hrodvarsson (
talk) 03:37, 23 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
El_C 06:45, 23 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Indefinite extended confirmed: Persistent
sockpuppetry – Autoconfirmed evasion by a long-term abuser; see page history for details.
Blake Gripling (
talk) 00:33, 24 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: Persistent addition of
unsourced or poorly sourced content – At least one IP editor (
here) continues to reinsert a huge amount of unsourced, unencyclopedic, trivial material into this article. .
Drmies (
talk) 16:34, 24 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk) 16:59, 24 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection., the disruption is likely gone--
Ymblanter (
talk) 10:00, 24 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary protection: Persistent removal by varying IPs of well sourced content, agreed upon on talk page
DVdm (
talk) 10:24, 24 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Indefinite full protection: Persistant
sockpuppetry and high level of vandalism. One admin has attempted to block sock puppets, but somehow more are coming back after some time and doing it again. I think it's the same people or same person due to similar user names and the fact they edit it the exact same way every time from what I can tell.
Hajiru (
talk) 02:03, 24 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. -- Deepfriedokra 12:18, 24 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Note: Full protection would mean only admins could edit it. No one should feel constrained if they think it needs it. -- Deepfriedokra 12:18, 24 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Note: Already semi'd till the morrow. -- Deepfriedokra 12:18, 24 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – IP editor keeps removing redirect and putting essentially a copy of the 2019 article there. Suggest locking this as a redirect for 6 months. The article has no real content now. .
...William, is the complaint department really on
the roof? 02:48, 24 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 05:10, 24 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Random IP addresses keep changing team when it's not been officially announced yet.
TheBigMan720 (
talk) 04:07, 24 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 05:10, 24 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 12:12, 24 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk) 12:25, 24 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – IP vandalism starting up right after previous protection ended. -- LuK3(Talk) 01:52, 24 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk) 11:50, 24 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – Anonymous IP users in the same range continue to say that it is her final album but no sources confirm that is her last one.
Raritydash (
talk) 08:44, 24 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. -- Deepfriedokra 11:51, 24 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., none of the recent socks made it to the autoconfirmed--
Ymblanter (
talk) 11:48, 24 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent removal of sourced content. ‐‐
1997kB (
talk) 13:07, 23 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Note: recuse-- I agree with removal as poorly sourced negative
WP:BLP -- Deepfriedokra 18:39, 23 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Declined, the article is now stable, and it is indeed not clear whether the material they were removing is based on a reliable source.--
Ymblanter (
talk) 08:30, 24 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent removal of sourced content. ‐‐
1997kB (
talk) 13:07, 23 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Note: Recuse-- I agree with content removal as negative, poorly sourced
WP:BLP -- Deepfriedokra 18:37, 23 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Declined, the article has now been redirected, and it is indeed not clear whether the material they were removing is based on a reliable source.--
Ymblanter (
talk) 08:31, 24 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last
8 days.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 06:25, 24 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Declined, please stop filing bogus requests, there is no disruptive editing in this article.--
Ymblanter (
talk) 08:28, 24 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 04:10, 24 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: Return of IP-hopping vandalism after recent end of previous protection.
RustyWire (
talk) 01:05, 24 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: This user who requested protection has been blocked.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 01:24, 24 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 01:54, 24 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Requesting immediate archiving... For reasons stated above.
Favonian (
talk) 09:54, 24 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., though the most prolific editor will likely become autoconfirmed tomorrow, and it would be useful to talk to them.--
Ymblanter (
talk) 09:57, 24 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – A number of IPs and new editors seem to believe that the
2020s start in 2021. Regardless of whether it is correct, (IMO, it isn't), it's disruptive. . —
Arthur Rubin(talk) 12:25, 23 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra 18:42, 23 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Note: I no longer remember what I was taught in school. Now I go cross-eyed when I try to think about it. -- Deepfriedokra 18:42, 23 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 04:10, 24 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – Election in Jharkhand resulted in loss for the incumbent CM. But the new CM will be sworn in on 27 and the current one is still the CM, yet high visibility results in people prematurely adding him as the CM.
TryKid (
talk) 07:57, 24 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk) 08:26, 24 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection. Many IP edits do not look like disruptive editing to me...
Jo-Jo Eumerus (
talk) 19:00, 23 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Consistent vandalism. This is probably going to be a problem as long as she's the head of Lucasfilm.
Nemov (
talk) 01:18, 24 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
El_C 01:19, 24 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of largely unsourced material by IP editor who will not engage on talkpage
Svejk74 (
talk) 19:36, 22 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced trivia by IPs and new accounts for many months now. Regards,
AustralianRupert (
talk) 23:32, 23 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra 00:10, 24 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Indefinite full protection: Persistent
vandalism – Page keeps dealing with persistent vandalism, keeps getting nominated for speedy deletion (even though this has been declined a few times already) + fake information keeps being added with no sources.
Platflyers (
talk) 21:17, 22 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: This user who requested protection has been blocked.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 21:30, 22 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent addition of
unsourced or poorly sourced content – Repeated unsourced COI violations spanning across eight years by multiple IP users, all which have every indication (IP Geo) that it's the subject itself, or someone closely related to the subject.
Jay D. Easy (
t •
c) 22:13, 22 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. – Only one IP edit in the last six months. There is nothing on the talk page about the problems that may exist with the article.
EdJohnston (
talk) 19:59, 23 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced content.
Mvcg66b3r (
talk) 21:11, 24 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last
8 days.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 21:13, 24 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. -- Deepfriedokra 21:41, 24 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra 21:41, 24 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Note: I don't like to indefinitely protect a page as it eventually causes problems. I also warned the 138.x IP If the persist, they can probably be range blocked. Pending will allow constructive IP edits and will be less onerous in the long run. If the situation changes, we can add more semi protection as needed.-- Deepfriedokra 21:41, 24 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Persistent vandalism from multiple IPs, apparently the banned user Nate Speed evading their block.
The Mirror Cracked (
talk) 20:54, 25 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Favonian (
talk) 21:03, 25 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism and addition of unsourced content.
Seco86484 (
talk) 18:33, 25 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk) 20:11, 25 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent
disruptive editing – Auto-confirmed accounts adding
WP:PRIMARY references for disputed content (promotional box office numbers claimed by the producer), same thing happened recently at another Mammootty-starrer Madhura Raja which then had to be ECP'ed multiple times. .
Continental Rift (
talk) 15:28, 25 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. –
Muboshgu (
talk) 16:39, 25 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
sockpuppetry – Resume of anonymous sock account from previous block. livelikemusictalk! 16:19, 25 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. One reverted edit since unprotection. –
Muboshgu (
talk) 16:47, 25 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
sockpuppetry. Page was previously semi-protected for 30 days, individual has since returned.
AmericanHistorian (
talk) 13:46, 25 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Declined, still.
El_C 13:48, 25 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – Multiple IPs, probably the same individual, are making the same edits which involve large factual changes to the infobox. Reverted by multiple users. I placed a 3RR notice on the last IP (before it switched again) -
[13], and asked that they discuss their proposed changes at:
Talk:Battle of Jamrud#Recent changes to infobox. They did not - and kept on doing the same edits.
Eostrix (
talk) 12:31, 25 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk) 14:05, 25 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. The page has been facing constant attacks of vandalism from users in India since the Indian government passed the citizenship bill. So I request that the page protection should be increased.
5.37.138.113 (
talk) 11:04, 25 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk) 11:35, 25 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Looks like an edit war regarding the infobox spanning a few days. -- LuK3(Talk) 02:05, 24 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Fully protected for a period of 2 days., after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra 12:23, 24 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Note: And, if I may be so bold, Peace on Earth to those of good will. -- Deepfriedokra 12:23, 24 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – always being vandalized and changed from "re-education camps" to concentration camps, please indef semi protect this page. .
ThegooduserLife Begins With a Smile :)🍁 02:27, 24 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra 12:26, 24 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Note: Indefinitely protecting always causes problems. Better to give an expiry and reinstate protection if the need rearises -- Deepfriedokra 12:26, 24 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: Continued
WP:DE among many IPs, adding unsourced/rumored information/speculation.
Magitroopa (
talk) 02:58, 24 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Note: Seems to have stopped for the nonce. Let us know if it starts up again -- Deepfriedokra 14:14, 24 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., it resumed indeed--
Ymblanter (
talk) 09:37, 25 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent
sockpuppetry. Page was previously semi-protected for 30 days, individual has since returned.
AmericanHistorian (
talk) 03:38, 25 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection.
El_C 06:16, 25 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – Various ip addresses have been continuously disruptive editing despite different confirmed editors reverting them. The various ip addresses keep claiming vandalism of confirmed editors reverting them when themselves (the various ip addresses) are ones disruptive editing. —
YoungForever(talk) 05:25, 25 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk) 09:29, 25 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 06:59, 25 December 2019 (UTC)reply
User(s)
blocked., I do not see any other socks in the last couple of years except for the one who was just blocked--
Ymblanter (
talk) 11:45, 24 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Note: Gott sei Dank. -- Deepfriedokra 11:48, 24 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Note: I'm loathe to indefinitely semiprotect. It often leads to problems. Maybe pending changes. -- Deepfriedokra 11:48, 24 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Actually, pinging
El C as another sleeper was recently blocked.
IanDBeacon (
talk) 23:58, 24 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Requesting immediate archiving... Page now semi-protected indefinitely by
El C.
IanDBeacon (
talk) 05:52, 25 December 2019 (UTC)reply
This sock returns to pages they vandalize, even months later. Missed this request, but indef protection has been my modus operandi for pages they become fixated with for a while now.
El_C 06:11, 25 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: In the past few weeks promotional content has been added repeatedly to this article and the sources content has been removed without any solid reason.
Skr15081997 (
talk) 15:22, 24 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 15:27, 24 December 2019 (UTC)reply
The article has indeed been semi-protected since 28 November--
Ymblanter (
talk) 17:03, 24 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: - IP vandalism and edit dispute in progress.
BabbaQ (
talk) 01:26, 25 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Declined Only one IP has been editing the page. If they are being disruptive they should be blocked rather than the page protected.
Galobtter (
pingó mió) 03:02, 25 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Indefinite semi-protection: User request.
ミラP 15:01, 24 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Declined per
Wikipedia:Protection policy#User pages, base user pages are already protected by an edit filter and user pages may be protected at need. "Pages in user space should not be automatically or pre-emptively protected." -- Deepfriedokra 21:56, 24 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Note: I hate to go around bursting bubbles, but I would not feel insulted if anyone called me a "communist" -- Deepfriedokra 23:20, 24 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – and adding unsourced content. Adding a 'citation needed' template for a word that doesn't exist is a bit of a stretch.
Semsurî (
talk) 20:12, 26 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra 20:24, 26 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent addition of
unsourced or poorly sourced content – Removal of information and adding unsourced content which they try to justify by simply adding templates. A simple google search renders no results.
[14].
Semsurî (
talk) 20:22, 26 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra 20:26, 26 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: rotating IPs continue to blank huge sections of the page in spite of addition of fix templates added to the article and discussion on the talk page.
MarnetteD|
Talk 18:40, 26 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. –
Muboshgu (
talk) 19:08, 26 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 16:35, 26 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Already protected by administrator JzG.
Favonian (
talk) 17:15, 26 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – Derivative of
this real-life kerfuffle and IP editors trying to restore an unsourced version, so as to favor their side in the dispute.
∯WBGconverse 14:47, 26 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. –
Muboshgu (
talk) 15:39, 26 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Content dispute (among IPs, mostly),
vandalism and other recurrent problems. Page was protected in the past, the same problems just come back.
Coltsfan (
talk) 16:12, 26 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
El_C 16:16, 26 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Page has been vandalized in the same manner again after protection was taken off.
Eternityworldd (
talk) 01:19, 26 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk) 09:53, 26 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: There has been a lot of disruptive edits and vandalism on the page from IP users, consistently in the past week. Page protection is needed to ensure such edits do not happen.
49.38.59.160 (
talk) 06:53, 26 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk) 12:43, 26 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism, IPs are probably the same user or a group of users vandalising the same thing over and over again. One IP was banned the other day but it doesn't stop them. Lulusword(talk) 07:36, 26 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Both pages get 1 week. –
Muboshgu (
talk) 15:30, 26 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary full protection: There's a content dispute currently being discussed at
Talk:Naval Air Station Pensacola shooting. The pace of the discussion seems to have frustrated some into keep trying to add their preferred version to the article. It might be a good idea to fully protect this per
WP:PREFER at least until the talk page discussion is resolved one way or the other. The alternative of warning editors about 3RR and EW is only likely to further exacerbate the situation and move things further from away resolution. If
WP:GOLD isn't an option, then perhaps a 1RR restriction can be added to the article since it's already covered by by
WP:ACDS and appropriate warnings issued to individual editors about what this means by an uninvolved admin. --
Marchjuly (
talk) 01:12, 26 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Fully protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk) 09:49, 26 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive changes from IP addresses and newly created accounts across multiple articles. Nearly every day requires at least one or two reverts. Ss112 08:55, 26 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk) 09:42, 26 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary full protection: Brand new editor is unable to understand the mechanism to request a new article in draft. Article has been reviewed as part of NPP.
. scope_creepTalk 23:00, 25 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Scope creep, Declined I mean if you don't explain your reversions or how to create a draft, the brand new editor is not going to magically understand. The editor has stopped once you left a message explaining your reversions, which you should have done after the first revert, not the third (or you should have explained your reversions in your edit summaries).
Galobtter (
pingó mió) 04:22, 26 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary full protection: Non-notable song redirect to album. It has been created into an article at least six times in the last year and half. Recently reverted back to redirect in last month. Two other attempts to create article. . scope_creepTalk 23:06, 25 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Declined From what I see of the page history, the page was continuously an article from 2013 until November this year, when TPH redirected it. Now I very well may agree the song is non-notable, but the point of protection isn't to privilege experienced users in a legitimate dispute - whether this song should be redirected or not should be discussed.
Galobtter (
pingó mió) 04:33, 26 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Indefinite semi-protection:BLP policy violations – There have been many edits to this page, often with unsourced additions/changes, and with the removal of important maintenance tags. As this is an article about a living person, the information here must be sourced properly.
WikkanWitch (
talk) 00:25, 25 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Hi
WikkanWitch, thank you very much for the report.
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. This may seem strange, but the last edit by anyone else was over a month ago. If a specific user repeatedly introduces challenged information, please warn them about edit warring first. You can add {{
subst:Uw-ewsoft}} to their talk page, or {{
subst:Uw-ew}} for a stronger warning, perhaps if the first warning did not help. If after such warnings, the user still continues to edit war, the
edit warring noticeboard is the best place to go. Long-term biased edits by a person with a conflict of interest can be reported at
WP:COIN as well, which helps to draw the community's attention to the issue. Page protection, contrary to all options mentioned before, is probably not the right tool to deal with such issues. Wikipedia only works because most pages are freely editable by anyone; protecting them forever without need would be a bad idea.
~ ToBeFree (
talk) 01:11, 25 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Note: The subject has expressed dissatisfaction with WikkanWitch's edits. I have referred them to BLP/Help -- Deepfriedokra 02:39, 25 December 2019 (UTC)reply
User(s)
blocked blocked by Widr., which is what I think you really meant, since the IP was making the edits. I have also revision deleted all their edits and edit summaries.
— Maile (
talk) 02:23, 26 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Galobtter (
pingó mió) 04:43, 26 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Persistent vandalism and violation of the BLP policy.
Hog Farm (
talk) 23:36, 25 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 00:32, 26 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 18:55, 27 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: A single-purpose account just moved it to a fictitious title to fit their opinion as soon as the protection was removed this morning: if spa's for the topic are now old enough to do that, the protection needs to come back quickly.
Kingsif (
talk) 16:15, 27 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Persistent vandalism/adding of unnecessary content by IP users.
L1amw90 (
talk) 16:55, 27 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. –
Muboshgu (
talk) 21:22, 27 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – IPv6 coming in with vandalism.
Jerod Lycett (
talk) 13:59, 27 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 15:39, 27 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 15:39, 27 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – People changing name and nickname repeatedly.
Jerod Lycett (
talk) 13:47, 27 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Indefinite full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Persistent edit warring with a picky editor.
Mvcg66b3r (
talk) 14:47, 26 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of
dispute resolution. -- Deepfriedokra 18:12, 26 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Note: I warned the two disputants bout edit warring. Not of a mind to prevent millions of Wikipedia users from editing this page. -- Deepfriedokra 18:12, 26 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Requesting immediate archiving...Favonian (
talk) 16:36, 27 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Note: Now rgey can go back to pulling wings off flies or drawing with magic markers in school books -- Deepfriedokra 22:39, 26 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Requesting immediate archiving...Favonian (
talk) 16:36, 27 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Full protection: There continue to be registered editors editing against consensus and the only way this appears to be going to stop in the short term is full protection, perhaps for one week or so. I thought semi-protection would end the problem but apparently not. I have posted on
Talk:Look at Her Now that editors need to seek a formal consensus to change the way things are per
WP:BRD. There have been several who have not listened. This has been going on for at least a month now. Ss112 10:37, 27 December 2019 (UTC)reply
{{subst:RFPP/sandbox|n}} That should do it -- <b>[[User:Deepfriedokra|<span style="color:black">Deep</span>]][[User talk:Deepfriedokra|<span style="color:red">fried</span>]][[Special:UserRights/Deepfriedokra|<span style="color:gold">okra</span>]] </b> 10:43, 27 December 2019 (UTC) to allay the bot's concerns
@
Deepfriedokra: Thank you, but I will note, there have been extended confirmed users who have changed this without consensus. The user CountyCountry, for instance, is one of them. I don't believe anything less than full protection is going to fix the problem until the users who disagree with the way the article was before they began changing it can establish consensus, hence why I requested that. The problem is recurring and has been going on for over a month. Ss112 11:43, 27 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – High level of vandalism .
JMHamo (
talk) 12:04, 27 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
🎄BethNaught🎄 (
talk) 12:11, 27 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. @
Migsmigss: There were only two edits by a single IP fourteen hours ago.
Johnuniq (
talk) 07:09, 27 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – The old protection must have expired, so they are doing it again.
Bollyjeff|talk 07:30, 27 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Let get these two talking about the problem. Moxy🍁 06:00, 27 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Moxy, Declined I warned Obsuser regarding edit warring, and it looks like
Illegitimate Barrister has indicated they won't re-remove the file, which is good - so it looks the edit warring will stop, and if it doesn't, the remedy would be blocks rather than a page protection. Thanks for your good advice and explanations of NFCC on both their user talk pages!
Galobtter (
pingó mió) 06:48, 27 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Multiple unregistered IP Users repeatedly vandalising page with rumoured celebrity names over the past few weeks.
Happily888 (
talk) 07:43, 27 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Reduction in protection level: From full protection to template editor protection. It is a subpage of my userpage where I keep my work notes. Back when I was an admin I fully protected it since people often blank or edit my user work notes, which messes up my work. Since I went on a long wikibreak I have been desysoped and I am now a template editor. Thus please set my work notes page to that level so I can edit it again. --
David Göthberg (
talk) 04:56, 27 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Done@
Davidgothberg: Template protection is used exclusively on templates, so I've reduced it to semi for you. Anarchyte (
talk |
work) 07:45, 27 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Indefinite pending changes: This one's a bit borderline, because the editing isn't super heavy, but a great majority of the recent non-revert edits to this article are vandalisms. I'm suggesting pending changes since the vandalism isn't super heavy, but it's most of the edits.
Hog Farm (
talk) 02:12, 27 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of two months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Pending changes is reasonable, but it doesn't reduce the work of reverting edits. Looking through the page history there are almost no useful edits from new users in the past few months so semi protection it is.
Galobtter (
pingó mió) 06:29, 27 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Reduction in protection level: The article has been semi-protected since 2009. I don't know of any reason why vandalism would be especially likely to become heavy and persistent. The protecting administrator does not appear to be active anymore.
142.160.131.220 (
talk) 05:01, 27 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – We have a dynamic IP user continually re-adding the NPOV "to correct colonial injustices of the British rule in present day Zimbabwe" to this article about a cricketer. It's not really the time or place for that POV - the article does mention land ownership changing. I *think* this could probably use a brief period of some level of protection just to put a stop to it. The dynamic nature of the IP means that my attempts to engage them in dialogue has failed; edits are tending not to use a meaningful edit summary.
Blue Square Thing (
talk) 00:55, 27 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Galobtter (
pingó mió) 06:22, 27 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Inappropriate use of user talk page while blocked – This might be harsh because the user wouldn't be able to request an unblock, but a lot of vandalism is going on at the user page.
Hog Farm (
talk) 02:17, 27 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 02:37, 27 December 2019 (UTC)reply
(Non-administrator comment) For some context - the subject of the article is involved in a social media controversy. A few days should be plenty. –
Erakura(talk) 05:40, 27 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Galobtter (
pingó mió) 06:16, 27 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Indefinite extended confirmed:Arbitration enforcement – Is supposed to have indefinite ECP per this at AE:
[15] For some reason it's only had it off and on since then instead.
-Crossroads- (
talk) 23:26, 26 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last
8 days.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 23:36, 26 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – IP and two new accounts with nearly identical names, repeatedly making the same edits despite multiple warnings: replacing all mentions and citations regarding Armenia with Azerbaijan; not adhering to
WP:NPOV or
WP:ARBAA2.
IamNotU (
talk) 23:58, 26 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Previously semi-protected until June 12 due to long term disruption. A recent full protection cycle seems to have wiped the semi.
VQuakr (
talk) 00:20, 27 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra 00:25, 27 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – The page is being too heavily edited for Pending Changes to be effective, and is flooding pending changes. Regular semi, on the same duration, should do the trick.
Captain EekEdits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 23:18, 26 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Mz7 (
talk) 23:38, 26 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Request to unprotect MKBHD Youtube personality
MKBHD has been subject to significant speculation regarding his middle name (K in the aforementioned name) which resulted in significant BLP vandalism and necessitated multiple page protections culminating with indefinite semi-protection. However, MKBHD has recently revealed his middle name publicly, which was added to the article and properly sourced under
WP:SELFSOURCE. As the 'controversy' has been settled and no further BLP vandalism is expected, please consider unprotecting the subject page. Attempt would have been made to contact the protecting admin,
User:Ad Orientem, but at the time this message was posted Ad Orientem's talk page states they're on vacation.
Melmann 12:16, 25 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Automated comment:@
Melmann: This request cannot be parsed. Please ensure it follows formatting consistent with the current or previous methods of submission.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 12:30, 25 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Unprotected.
El_C 23:07, 26 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Unprotection: From semi-protection to unprotection. I am one of the two IPs who edited the article today. I stopped after Coltsfan gave me a reason. The other IP had his/her revisions undone by ME and was warned also by ME. I can't edit the talk page of the administrator who semi-protected the article.
187.74.161.236 (
talk) 17:25, 26 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Since
El C protected the page today, it should be up to them. –
Muboshgu (
talk) 19:33, 26 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Unprotected.
El_C 23:06, 26 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Financial vandalism by IPs. .
Fylindfotberserk (
talk) 09:43, 28 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Thanks for reporting this.
— Newslingertalk 21:36, 28 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – In the last 2 weeks, two similar-looking IPs have edited this article and made sure to remove anything that makes the company look negative. In both cases, they removed an entire paragraph in the "2000s" section about the company recently going into administration, and without any justification. This is despite the paragraph being fully referenced.
Since the company going into administration was quite recent (about 2-3 weeks ago), perhaps this article should be semi-protected for a month as a precaution. –
numbermaniac 13:21, 28 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Indefinite extended confirmed: Persistent
vandalism – As soon as the protection tag remove two IP has done several mass removal of content and adding whatever they wish. Please protect the page for indefinite period.
Sony R (
talk) 13:27, 28 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – new ip users not aware of wikipedia rules regarding sports transactions. No announcement has been made by the team yet.
Idan (
talk) 09:54, 28 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Zvikorn, is the source added in the most recent edit a reporting of an official announcement? BTW, we do have templates made specifically for this issue: {{current sports transaction}} for the banner at the top of the page, and {{uw-sportstrans}} for user talk pages. –
Muboshgu (
talk) 17:13, 28 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Recent anonymous editor vandalism. Recommend semi-protection for a short time.
Veggies (talk) 19:26, 28 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Thanks for reporting this.
— Newslingertalk 20:24, 28 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Permanent semi-protection: This article is about a book published in 1985 that highlighted several U.S. colleges and universities as exemplary. Nearly all of the edits to the article consist of unregistered editors or vandals adding institutions that aren't included in the book or removing institutions that are included in the book. The lists aren't going to ever change and it's tedious to have to continually revert these edits.
ElKevbo (
talk) 20:25, 28 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Indefinite pending changes: Year round addition of unsourced content, vandalism, changing sourced facts, addition of trivia and more unhelpful edits by new and ip users.
Redalert2fan (
talk) 14:21, 28 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. –
Muboshgu (
talk) 17:32, 28 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Short-term semi-protection:Vandalism from dynamic IP editor. Hopefully 24–48 hours should do the trick. --
IJBall (
contribs •
talk) 17:33, 28 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 72 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. –
Muboshgu (
talk) 17:41, 28 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: Repeated vandalism over the past couple of days from several newly created accounts and the like. Ss112 14:06, 28 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Comment I am taking it a step further and requesting that it be indefinite semi-protection. First it was genre-warring, now it’s incessant, daily vandalism and disruption.
Trillfendi (
talk) 15:05, 28 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Indefinite is disproportionate, as the article hadn't been protected in about 10 weeks, and then it was a three day protection. –
Muboshgu (
talk) 17:17, 28 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 15:44, 28 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – Short-term IP disruption. -- LuK3(Talk) 15:02, 28 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 15:44, 28 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Was protected previously, but now back to being vandalised again by IPs.
Britishfinance (
talk) 15:34, 28 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 16:14, 28 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection (for at least a month or two): There was a possible sockpuppetry and the random IP addresses keep on adding unreferenced sources (the editor had already placed
Hidden text comment to earlier inform editors not to change or include text to avoid
misinformation or considered as vandalism (that occurred on 19 October 2019 and 16 December 2019, but the goodwill IP addresses revert vandalism on 12 and 23 December, respectively; the first one also had vandalised on 23 December but the same IP address revert said edit hours later). I also need some admins or the editors who work on the article to frequently to monitor the respectively pages to counter the case. Thank you. (
203.78.15.150 (
talk) 03:59, 28 December 2019 (UTC))reply
Being hit by an IP hopping vandal all day.
Ifnord (
talk) 22:21, 27 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 00:56, 28 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent
sockpuppetry – People keep removing image just they don't like it.
FilmandTVFan28 (
talk) 23:43, 27 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Extended confirmed protection: Seems like "stans" are taking the opportunity to vandalize the page with nonsense because of its unprotection.
Trillfendi (
talk) 18:32, 27 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Not done Page hasn't been edited in two months. –
Muboshgu (
talk) 21:34, 27 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – Twice has the page been deleted. Two SPA accounts now push for its creation again, misleadingly equating actions of some Kurdish groups with 'Kurdish terrorism' (with no explicit mention of 'Kurdish terrorism' in the references).
Semsurî (
talk) 21:07, 27 December 2019 (UTC)reply
I just want to say that this protection attemp is pointless because the editor who requested this protection had replaced sourced information about events in Iran with a redirect to Turkish-Kurdish conflicts who hides the presented information about Iran in the article. Please see the article history.
115.124.156.109 (
talk) 21:12, 27 December 2019 (UTC)reply
The editor who started this request has also tried to redirect the page to
Kurdish nationalism which is not the topic of the article.
[16] Please take a look at the article history before taking action in protection level.
115.124.156.109 (
talk) 21:22, 27 December 2019 (UTC)reply
If you insist on having a POV- and OR-filled article on Wikipedia, you should clean it as well. If you're not interested in that, there's no reason to have it kept. --
Semsurî (
talk) 21:31, 27 December 2019 (UTC)reply
I will help to clean it up and I have also added references. But you should not create pointless redirects of this article to other articles who are not the topic of this article. And then in your next step you should not starting a request for protection to refuse the editing of other users who want to help to improve the article. Instead of the templates you added, you should also look for sources.
115.124.156.109 (
talk) 23:49, 27 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Sudden spate of "we were cheated" type edits by IPs, It appears a call when against a certain team.
Meters (
talk) 21:28, 29 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Malcolmxl5 (
talk) 21:49, 29 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism.
NedFausa (
talk) 21:35, 29 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Malcolmxl5 (
talk) 21:50, 29 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Extended confirmed protection: Persistent
vandalism - Page vandalism. Section Reception is still undergoing an edit war between users, with single account users using the section to vandalise the page in breach of
WP:USERGEN.
WhoKnew99 (
talk) 15:37, 29 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Declined. I don't think we are quite there yet.
El_C 15:55, 29 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of six monthsa, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Let's see if six months discourages them. Acroterion(talk) 18:40, 29 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – The page is currently suffering from disruptive edits with unsourced material and edit wars with regards to the movie box office and budgets. Unknown IPs are troll editing and vandalizing the article. The topic is currently hot so the disruptive editing and edit wars from fandoms of actors keep happening. I request the administrators to protect this article for at least 3 weeks.
Ranadhira Naika (
talk) 15:25, 29 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
El_C 15:53, 29 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Declined There are a lot of edits from IPs and new accounts but some of the appear to be good. If it swings the other way and there ends up being a lot of reverting please re-report. Callanecc (
talk •
contribs •
logs) 05:35, 29 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Vandalism and removal of sources by multiple IPs. .
Fylindfotberserk (
talk) 10:02, 29 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Malcolmxl5 (
talk) 14:09, 29 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Indefinite pending changes: Persistent
disruptive editing – Page has been experiencing disruptive editing by IPs since creation. 'Pending changes' protection could still make it possible for constructive IP edits, but at the moment the article continues to experience removal of verified information or the adding of POV or unsourced info.
Semsurî (
talk) 14:20, 29 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Where did I add POV or remove verified information? The passage I removed was not
notable.
[17] This is not a reason for page protection or pending changes.
112.168.99.216 (
talk) 14:26, 29 December 2019 (UTC)reply
You removed referenced information and still refrain from explaining why it is not notable when the local name of the religion is Serfedîn. --
Semsurî (
talk) 14:28, 29 December 2019 (UTC)reply
The information was not even mentioned in the reference. But I have still added the local name to the infobox for you.
[18]112.168.99.216 (
talk) 14:33, 29 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
El_C 14:39, 29 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Joeykai You'll need to re-run the reference tool you used. Callanecc (
talk •
contribs •
logs) 05:37, 29 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Recently, there's been a lot of disruptive edits from multiple IP addresses. .
Clovermoss(talk) 02:14, 29 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Let's revisit
extended confirmed protection if the disruptive editing persists. Thanks for reporting this.
— Newslingertalk 05:17, 29 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Please resubmit if the vandalism persists. Thanks for reporting this.
— Newslingertalk 05:29, 29 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Lots of vandalism due to recent championship win.
Viewratio (
talk) 05:16, 29 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Thanks for reporting this.
— Newslingertalk 05:22, 29 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Thanks for reporting this.
— Newslingertalk 05:24, 29 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Lots of vandalism today, likely due to loss in Peach Bowl. Temporary semi-protection should be enough to deal with this for a week or two until everything dies down.
Hog Farm (
talk) 01:45, 29 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Much recent vandalism.
MB 03:25, 29 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 04:01, 29 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Thanks for reporting this. — Newslingertalk 05:08, 29 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Thanks for reporting this.
— Newslingertalk 05:12, 29 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 8 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. The page was protected by Zzuuzz. Thanks for reporting this. — Newslingertalk 00:31, 29 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last
8 days.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 01:46, 29 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection (for at least three months or four): Persistent
vandalism. The page keeps having anons adding more one-off character list despite the fact that this is a work page, thus making it necessary to only include important characters to the storyline.
Zero stylinx (
talk) 05:00, 28 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Not done. This looks like a content dispute instead of vandalism, especially since no edits were explicitly reverted in the past two months. If the dispute escalates into an
edit war, please resubmit the page for protection.
— Newslingertalk 21:22, 28 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – IP bloating infobox with various abilities. Looks like they started back in November.
S0091 (
talk) 18:11, 28 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Thanks for the response and providing the appropriate range @
Newslinger:. I had only noticed the edits at Lucifer.
S0091 (
talk) 20:46, 28 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – The same joke keeps getting plastered onto the page and I'm pretty sure it's not gonna stop any time soon.
puggo (
talk) 23:14, 28 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Thanks for reporting this. — Newslingertalk 00:25, 29 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Indefinite semi-protection: – Persistent vandalism from not only IP users but registered users as well, over the past two months. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7] – PhilipTerryGraham (
talk·articles·reviews) 00:06, 29 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Thanks for reporting this.
— Newslingertalk 00:27, 29 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 16:19, 30 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – I would like to request page protection due to multiple vandalism by different users.
Sophiajoanne (
talk) 13:16, 30 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra 14:58, 30 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary full protection: Persistent
vandalism – 103 edits alone just today. Whispering(
t) 14:09, 30 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Full protection is for content disputes. I hardly think the frantic back-and-forth as to whether the actor is a "superstar" or a "megastar" qualifies as a content dispute, or that there is much hope of reaching a consensus about it on talk.
Bishonen |
talk 14:15, 30 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Indefinite full protection: Persistent
vandalism – LTA target/highly controversial subject.
IanDBeacon (
talk) 02:14, 30 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Not done. It doesn't look like there's enough disruption to justify
full protection. If disruptive editing continues to affect the article after the recent block, please request
semi-protection. Thanks for reporting this.
— Newslingertalk 03:37, 30 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Vandalism occurred right after protection ceased. If not indefinite, then at least for a year.
SurpriseandConquer (
talk) 08:40, 30 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Thanks for requesting this.
— Newslingertalk 08:49, 30 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Persistent vandalism. See
123. As well as repeated deletion of content backed by sources and consensus
45678910.
userdude 04:24, 30 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism.
BlameRuiner (
talk) 05:28, 30 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Thanks for reporting this.
— Newslingertalk 05:40, 30 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Reduction in protection level: From full protection to semi protection. It is a subpage of my user page. Back when I was an admin I fully protected it since people often blank or edit my user pages, which messes up my work. Since I went on a long wikibreak I have been desysoped and I am now a template editor. Thus please set my user subpage to that level so I can edit it again. --
David Göthberg (
talk) 00:00, 30 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: The banned StealthForce keeps changing the episode/season count via dynamic IP addresses. There were only two seasons and 16 eps of this series, but he doesn't know when to stop! It's just frustrating.
Johnnysama (
talk) 02:14, 30 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
El_C 03:43, 30 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Ever since this page was unprotected on November 25, pretty much every edit has been vandalism.
Opencooper (
talk) 02:49, 30 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
El_C 03:42, 30 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Thanks for reporting this.
— Newslingertalk 03:25, 30 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Thanks for reporting this.
— Newslingertalk 03:28, 30 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Thanks for reporting this.
— Newslingertalk 01:09, 30 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Thanks for reporting this.
— Newslingertalk 01:11, 30 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – Persistent addition of promotional material of educational institutions that are not notable for inclusion. The page was protected for the same reason in the past, due to continued long-term abuse by blocked user
Rakvoggu and the various sock/meat accounts and IPs that edit this article on behalf of Rakvoggu. See also
User talk:Rakvoggu and the revision history of
Sathupalli. –
Aranya (
talk) 17:42, 29 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Thanks for reporting this.
— Newslingertalk 01:13, 30 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Thanks for reporting this.
— Newslingertalk 01:15, 30 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: Every day or so someone creates a new account to accuse Fenn of some kind of fraud. (Sometimes they accuse him of faking his cancer, sometimes of keeping money that was to be donated to charity.) One of the accounts created was actually called
Fraud-Fenn.
ApLundell (
talk) 19:06, 29 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 22:19, 29 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Protected by Bishonen. Thanks for reporting this. — Newslingertalk 01:17, 30 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism.
NedFausa (
talk) 19:15, 29 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Thanks for reporting this.
— Newslingertalk 01:19, 30 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – IPs keep adding unsourced or poorly sourced genres in the article and they also genre warring as well.
TheAmazingPeanuts (
talk) 17:07, 29 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Pending-changes protected for a period of 31 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Thanks for reporting this.
— Newslingertalk 00:50, 30 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: The subject of this page died recently, and a flood of malicious edits has ensued.
Itsmeaubey (
talk) 22:03, 29 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
El_C 00:51, 30 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – Since the expiry of the semi protection in November, a seemingly never-ending stream of new editors have been repeating nearly the same edit, i.e removing the label of conspiracy theorist.
Galobtter (
pingó mió) 22:24, 29 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
El_C 00:50, 30 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism. The main Siyum HaShas event is coming up on January 1 at
MetLife Stadium. Other Siyum HaShas events will be held around the world in January and February.
Yoninah (
talk) 20:52, 29 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection., there recently was only one IP editing disruptively. If they reappear they must be blocked.--
Ymblanter (
talk) 21:05, 29 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Multiple IP editors and 1 non-autoconfirmed editor tried to change the dates from 2010-2019 to 2011-2020 without getting consensus on talk. Also high-risk page since the new decade is about to begin.
Koopinator (
talk) 21:32, 29 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
El_C 00:47, 30 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Malcolmxl5 (
talk) 22:50, 29 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: Continuous disruptive editing by IPs. I request a longer protection than the 48 hour one which expired last week. Thanks. Alivardi (
talk) 20:43, 31 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. –
Muboshgu (
talk) 21:11, 31 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – Due to disruptive editing by IP users that don't discuss their changes and go against consensus.
MikkelJSmith (
talk) 16:36, 31 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. –
Muboshgu (
talk) 18:07, 31 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Indefinite extended confirmed: Persistent
vandalism – There has been constant vandalism of this GA by IPs and new accounts adding arbitrary figures to the box office revenue, perhaps because they think it's funny or they don't understand how WP works.
AtsmeTalk📧 17:27, 31 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Not done Pending changes appears to be working just fine. –
Muboshgu (
talk) 18:10, 31 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Revision keeps being made after multiple editors have explained why it isn't appropriate.
QRep2020 (
talk) 17:28, 31 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 19:40, 31 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Already protected by administrator Kinu. –
Muboshgu (
talk) 21:00, 31 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Multiple IPs keep putting the Ron Rivera has been hired as head coach. It has not been announced by the organization themselves.
TheBigMan720 (
talk) 19:40, 31 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. –
Muboshgu (
talk) 21:05, 31 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent
vandalism – Same as Texas Longhorns.
Jdcomix (
talk) 18:52, 31 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., I do not see any reason for extended confirmed protection--
Ymblanter (
talk) 18:55, 31 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism, creating fake draws. Is it also possible to revert the edits back to KM251's last edit as there have been too many disruption edits to revert them all manually.
Keroks (
talk) 16:08, 31 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. –
Muboshgu (
talk) 17:59, 31 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – Constant spam despite PC. In the last nearly two months, one edit by a non-AC user was constructive. Everything else was disruptive/spam. –
Frood (
talk) 06:14, 31 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. –
Muboshgu (
talk) 17:52, 31 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Pending Changes Protection: Persistent
vandalism – There's been some good IP edits, but also a lot of vandalism. I think this article would benefit from pending changes protection because of that.
Clovermoss(talk) 05:50, 31 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Indefinite full protection: This page appears to have persistent deletion of
WP:Reference sources. .
SH 11:29, 31 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., not a level of disruption which would merit a full protection--
Ymblanter (
talk) 15:11, 31 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – I would like to request for page protection for this article due to persistent vandalism by different users.
Sophiajoanne (
talk) 07:03, 31 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Please protect: consistent BLP violations. I know it is New Year's, but this article is receiving a massive amount of BLP vandalism, including un-sourced sexual orientation content.
Eostrix (
talk) 10:48, 31 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 11:23, 31 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent addition of
unsourced or poorly sourced content – Editor keeps recreating page which is currently a redirect to locality due to it being a non-notable primary school. Completely unsourced, promotional text, revisions have also been redacted due to copyright violations.
Steven (Editor) (
talk) 02:56, 31 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Fully protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. @
Steven (Editor): Semi protection would not stop the one editor doing this. I don't want to block them until I have time/energy to try and engage with them, and that's not going to happen at this time of year. Please notify me if needed next year.
Johnuniq (
talk) 10:33, 31 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Short-term IP vandalism starting yesterday. -- LuK3(Talk) 03:11, 31 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 07:07, 31 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Protected by another admin.
Johnuniq (
talk) 10:33, 31 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Full-protection: addition of unnecessary fancruft, and failure to discuss.
Jack Sebastian (
talk) 20:23, 29 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Question: full protection usually reserved to curtail edit warring. Is there edit warring taking place? Please provide diffs to verify.
El_C 00:54, 30 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Note: Not ripe yet. and may the schwartz be with youuuuu." -- Deepfriedokra 11:03, 30 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Indefinite extended confirmed:BLP policy violations – This is getting very problemsum. This needs to be set. - FlightTime (
open channel) 00:01, 31 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. @
FlightTime: I only see recent problems from new editors/IPs. This gets us over the holiday season when another request can be made if needed.
Johnuniq (
talk) 10:08, 31 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: As the film release date is nearing some un-necessary edits are occurring so i request any admin to please protect this page temporarily until 31 January 2020. Thank you :). Sai Raghavendra Puranam 10:54, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra 11:17, 30 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Note: It looks like some constructive edits, so there is risk of collateral damage. -- Deepfriedokra 11:17, 30 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection:BLP policy violations – A number of different IPs (3 128-bit ones in different ranges, and 2 32-bit ones) are adding defamatory information (not paying artists, punching). Another 32-bit IP removed this. Initially no sources. Now sourced to Facebook with no mention of Bond.
Eostrix (
talk) 14:36, 30 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra 15:08, 30 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent
vandalism – Shifting IP keeps coming back and gradually blanking it.
-Crossroads- (
talk) 04:20, 31 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
AustralianRupert (
talk) 09:50, 31 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection: vandalism by shifting ips. If they've stopped by the time you get to this report then so much the better.
MarnetteD|
Talk 05:30, 31 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., the genre was first changed by an established editor, try to discuss with them--
Ymblanter (
talk) 09:40, 31 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Indefinite Pending Changes protection: Lots of unsourced edits being made to the article; violates
WP:BLP. —
Sarvatra (
talk,
contribs) 09:13, 31 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--
Ymblanter (
talk) 09:37, 31 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Reviewing the edit war, this looks to be a BITE situation. Looks like just some random person trying to improve an article, and you frustratingly stonewalling that without engaging in reasonable human communication.
~Swarm~{sting} 07:35, 30 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Note: Concur with
Swarm. I would recommend taking a breath and telling the new user exactly what you think the problem is, as clearly, and jargon-free as possible. He has asked for an explanation, and the template warnings are not responsive at all. Merely confusing and ominous. -- Deepfriedokra 11:07, 30 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Full protection: indefinite. Edit warring has increased since Lashawn Daniels passed away in September (misconstruing facts in his personal life, changing the dates of his children's birthdays, deleting all of the information regarding his personal life). As the legal administrator of his estate, I, April Daniels, would like his wikipedia to only be edited by the administrator (i.e., April Daniels) so that I can solely provide the necessary information to his wikipedia page, so the public may be accurately informed.
Okramber (
talk) 01:43, 31 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to
justify protection. Please read
Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. Also, we do not protect content on Wikipedia to limit the editing to one user. As well intentioned as you are, if you are the administrator of his estate, your editing would be a conflict of interest on this article.
— Maile (
talk) 03:03, 31 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Question: Disruptive in what way? Sorry, I'm having a difficult time parsing this request.
El_C 03:47, 30 December 2019 (UTC)reply
I see that I semi-protected the article until 10 January 2020. The only useful protection available now would be full as it appears that established editors are edit warring over details.
WP:ECP would not help.
Johnuniq (
talk) 04:35, 30 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Indefinite semi-protection: Page is a redirect to
Walt Disney Pictures, but IP editors have been continually and repeatedly removing then re-adding the redirect. Since there is very little useful editing to take place on a redirect, I think indefinite would make sense here. –
Erakura(talk) 17:22, 30 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Note: The diverse IP edits on the redirect, going back to 2007, all seem to be a lone IP hopper from the same ISP in Hanoi, Vietnam.
— Maile (
talk) 17:59, 30 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of Indefinitely, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
— Maile (
talk) 02:37, 31 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Temporary semi-protection Edit warring over if the impeachment of Trump belongs in successful or ongoing. Was semi-protected for 3 days earlier this month, and edit warring resumed when it wore off. I suggest protection at least until the end of January. I'd do it myself, but I've been
involved in editing the page. ~ ONUnicorn(
Talk|
Contribs)problem solving 19:38, 30 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
— Maile (
talk) 02:45, 31 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 18:20, 30 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-protection:Edit warring and Persistent vandalism by adding same unsourced and wrong materials, more seems to advertising own name again and again by a new user.
Dey subrata (
talk) 18:07, 30 December 2019 (UTC)reply