Hello there, welcome to the 'pedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you need pointers on how we title pages visit Wikipedia:Naming conventions or how to format them visit our manual of style. If you have any other questions about the project then check out Wikipedia:Help or add a question to the Village pump. Cheers! -- maveric149 10:13, 15 March 2003 (edit by User:Mav at 10:13 on 15 March 2003)
On 31 July 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Mohammad Fahad al-Qahtani, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Saudi Arabian professor and ACPRA co-founder Mohammad al-Qahtani expects a "snowball" loss of control by the Saudi government? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Mohammad Fahad al-Qahtani. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Orlady ( talk) 16:03, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
Hello there, user. Consider that you were taking charge of contributing to the Saudi Arabian protests, if you read the recent news there would be two deaths: a protester and a government soldier. I have place the soldier name as part of the death list, but I can't really tell if that's the right place to put, unless if you really want the death table section to be under protester-ONLY death (meaning no pro-government troops were included). Either way, I will leave those for you to decide where you want to put the soldier's death. Thanks
Myronbeg ( talk) 15:00, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
Hi, user. You will need this:
August 5 http://www.presstv.ir/detail/254508.html
August 6 http://www.presstv.ir/detail/2012/08/06/254715/saudis-hold-antiregime-demo-in-tarout/
August 7 http://www.presstv.ir/detail/254934.html
And recently 13 August http://www.nowlebanon.com/NewsArticleDetails.aspx?ID=427435
Thanks
Myronbeg (
talk) 13:12, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
Hi, user. There are two events ongoing, but for the one in Awamiyah, do you think it should be under the Saudi protests or it just another outside event? If it should be included then I will include another death toll.
http://www.trust.org/alertnet/news/saudis-stage-rare-protest-over-security-detentions-without-trial
Thanks. Myronbeg ( talk) 14:26, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/09/24/us-saudi-protests-idUSBRE88M0GT20120924 Myronbeg ( talk) 05:51, 24 September 2012 (UTC)
http://ca.reuters.com/article/topNews/idCABRE88Q05920120927 Myronbeg ( talk) 07:57, 27 September 2012 (UTC)
On 24 August 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Alexander Barankov, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the Belarusian Alexander Barankov was given political asylum in Ecuador in 2010 but risks extradition back to Belarus? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Alexander Barankov. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Casliber ( talk · contribs) 00:02, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
On 10 September 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Political prisoners in Saudi Arabia, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that recent estimates of the number of political prisoners in Saudi Arabia range from a denial of any political prisoners at all to 30,000? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Political prisoners in Saudi Arabia. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Panyd The muffin is not subtle 16:02, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
On 3 October 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Suliman al-Reshoudi, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that human rights lawyer Suliman al-Reshoudi was convicted of possessing literature by social anthropologist Madawi al-Rasheed? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Suliman al-Reshoudi. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Yngvadottir ( talk) 00:03, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
Are you familiar with this case? [1] If I can find enough sources, I'm going to try to start an article on al-Hashimi in the next couple days. Thought you might be interested, given your previous work in this area. Cheers, and enjoy the week, -- Khazar2 ( talk) 13:21, 21 October 2012 (UTC)
The WikiProject Report would like to focus on WikiProject Human Rights for a Signpost article. This is an excellent opportunity to draw attention to your efforts and attract new members to the project. Would you be willing to participate in an interview? If so, here are the questions for the interview. Just add your response below each question and feel free to skip any questions that you don't feel comfortable answering. Multiple editors will have an opportunity to respond to the interview questions, so be sure to sign your answers. If you know anyone else who would like to participate in the interview, please share this with them. Have a great day. –Mabeenot ( talk) 17:48, 9 November 2012 (UTC)
http://observers.france24.com/content/20121109-people-will-not-forget-those-killed-saudi-shiites-march-dead-saudi-arabia-qatif-protest Myronbeg ( talk) 04:27, 10 November 2012 (UTC)
It was agreed already on the talk page of that article that there are no sources to confirm a Battle of Damascus, it was the POV of one editor, Alhanuty. Also, the article was more of a content fork from the Rif Dimashq campaign article. All other editors agreed that the info from the article was better suited to Rif Dimashq campaign article (by a count of 3 to 1). And it was merged. Alhanuty went against consensus and reverted back without even talking. Alhanuty didn't even try to start a new discussion, he simply went against a majority consensus. And I'm once again pointing out that the article, which he created, is totally at this point his own POV because there are no sources to indicate a battle for Damascus or even a siege as he suggested. Also, more than half the content he put in the article is already in the other one. The current rebel offensive that Alhanuty has been pointing out to has not been happening in Damascus itself, but 30 kilometers to the east of the capital in Rif Dimashq province, which the Rif Dimashq campaign article already covers in detail. This includes the airport which itself is not in the capital itself, but 30 kilometers southeast from it, and is already covered in the other article. I have merged the new content that you added to the Rif Dimashq campaign article, thank you for those updates. EkoGraf ( talk) 14:43, 3 December 2012 (UTC)
Can you comment on this? FutureTrillionaire ( talk) 22:01, 18 December 2012 (UTC)
Can you comment on this also? Talk:Rif Dimashq offensive (November 2012–present)#Damascus offensive. -- FutureTrillionaire ( talk) 23:18, 18 December 2012 (UTC)
Hello! Your submission of International Criminal Court investigation in Mali at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! The C of E God Save the Queen! ( talk) 11:12, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
On 15 February 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article International Criminal Court investigation in Mali, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the International Criminal Court is conducting an investigation into alleged war crimes in Mali? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/International Criminal Court investigation in Mali. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
— Crisco 1492 ( talk) 05:51, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
The article International Middle East Media Center has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
brew
crewer
(yada, yada) 16:27, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
I agree with you re Contract of mandate. Now deleted.-- SPhilbrick (Talk) 18:45, 27 July 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Geneva II Middle East peace conference may have broken the syntax by modifying 3 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page(Click show ⇨)
|
---|
|
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 23:14, 31 August 2013 (UTC)
Thank you for taking the time to look over the Dolfinarium Harderwijk article. Apparently I missed a whole lot of small mistakes and you managed to further clear up some other sentences as well. It is appreciated! I also wish to express my appreciation for the articles you create and contribute to yourself. You produce some really important and in-the-news content. Keep it up. Crispulop ( talk) 22:57, 2 September 2013 (UTC)
Hello! Your submission of Geneva II Middle East peace conference at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Crispulop ( talk) 14:39, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
On 10 September 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Geneva II Middle East peace conference, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that during the weeks before the 2013 Ghouta attacks, Lakhdar Brahimi and Ban Ki-moon worked closely with Russian and US diplomats towards a possible Geneva II Syrian peace conference? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Geneva II Middle East peace conference. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
The DYK project ( nominate) 00:02, 10 September 2013 (UTC)
On 5 October 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Ali Mohammed Baqir al-Nimr, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Ali al-Nimr used a BlackBerry to encourage protests, underwent an unfair trial, and may soon be crucified and beheaded? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Ali Mohammed Baqir al-Nimr. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
— Chris Woodrich ( talk) 07:10, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 08:51, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Hello, Boud. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Boud. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Articles that you have been involved in editing— Monotypic taxon and Monospecificity—have been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. Nessie ( talk) 16:04, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Boud. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Hi I’ve added a PROD template to an article you created some years ago. The Global Hunger Alliance seems to have vanished. Mccapra ( talk) 15:46, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
On 1 June 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Anti male-guardianship campaign, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Saudi women are organising an anti male-guardianship campaign? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Anti male-guardianship campaign. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Anti male-guardianship campaign), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Alex Shih ( talk) 05:34, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
YasminaDD ( talk) 22:46, 2 June 2018 (UTC) Hi Boud.Thanks for your edit. I added a reference for the first "citation needed". However, for the second part, I am not sure how can I cite emails and meetings that took place years ago?
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Itzcóatl Tonatiuh Bravo Padilla, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page El Informador ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:12, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
Hi, thanks for helping out with the reviews at DYK. Just a heads-up: if you write a hook, you cannot review it, per Rule H2. It seems the nominator did tweak this one enough to make it his own, but in future you could either suggest a new hook and then leave it to another editor to finish reviewing the nomination, or encourage the nominator to write his own alt hooks. Thanks, Yoninah ( talk) 22:42, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm new to Wikipedia and don't really know how it works, but I created an article about a prominant and notable woman. I'm wondering how to get it to appear on Wikipedia. Can you help? It's over here:
/info/en/?search=Draft:Cyan_Banister
Thank you if you can help!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 1Mynamegoeshere1 ( talk • contribs) 23:11, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
Narutolovehinata5 t c csd new 04:42, 18 September 2018 (UTC)
On 22 September 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Israa al-Ghomgham, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Israa al-Ghomgham could become the first Saudi woman to be beheaded as punishment for defending human rights? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Israa al-Ghomgham. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Israa al-Ghomgham), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cas Liber ( talk · contribs) 00:01, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tiger Squad is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tiger Squad until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.-- DBig Xrayᗙ 20:20, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited National Society for Human Rights, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tweet ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 18:20, 8 November 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Boud. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
On 5 December 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article ALQST, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that ALQST is a Saudi Arabian human rights organisation created by a former Royal Saudi Air Force officer? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/ALQST. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, ALQST), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Alex Shih ( talk) 12:01, 5 December 2018 (UTC)
Hi. I've moved this article to draft because it is in a pretty poor state. It looks like you created it from existing content so it's nothing personal. However, it's obvious that the subject of the article has been editing it and it is basically promotional from start to finish. If you want to do anything about it, you know where to find it. Deb ( talk) 12:50, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Committee for the Abolition of Illegitimate Debt is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Committee for the Abolition of Illegitimate Debt until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Just Chilling ( talk) 16:26, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Committee for the Abolition of Illegitimate Debt, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Counterpunch ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:07, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
Draft:Naresh Dadhich (political scientist), a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Naresh Dadhich (political scientist) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Naresh Dadhich (political scientist) during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. MPS1992 ( talk) 04:34, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Khalifa Haftar, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page LNA ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:14, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Maria Ribeiro (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an orphaned disambiguation page which either
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — Gorthian ( talk) 03:30, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
On 26 June 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article 2019 Saudi Arabia mass execution, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the 37 civilians beheaded by the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia in April 2019 included at least three who were minors at the time of their arrest? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/2019 Saudi Arabia mass execution. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, 2019 Saudi Arabia mass execution), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Amakuru ( talk) 00:01, 26 June 2019 (UTC)
Hi Why the name of the article is Sovereignty Council of Sudan and not Sovereignty Council? -- Panam2014 ( talk) 23:01, 21 August 2019 (UTC)
A note about using a peer-to-peer communication app in HK is interesting, but I'm afraid it's not about Bluetooth mesh protocol, as standardized by Bluetooth SIG. To my knowledge, none of the phones available on the market are capable of peer-to-peer Bluetooth mesh communication. They only can talk to mesh network if one of the nodes provide them with so-called proxy capability. So I assume that Bridgefy app uses some other form of mesh communication, most probably based on iBeacon protocol. iBeacon is based on Bluetooth Low Energy like Bluetooth mesh is, but they are different things. Summarizing, I'd suggest to move your info to some other Bluetooth- or mesh- related pages. MichalHobot ( talk) 11:43, 3 September 2019 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of September 2019 Hong Kong protests, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Standard ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 13:17, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
In
your edit of
Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2019 October 15, you used the markup ''humans'<span />''
, which includes a self-closed span tag, which is one of the tags that is not supposed to be self-closed. I changed your markup to ''humans'<nowiki />''
, as the nowiki tag is allowed to be self-closed. For more on self-closed tags, see
mw:Help:Extension:Linter/self-closed-tag. Cheers! —
Anomalocaris (
talk) 16:59, 24 October 2019 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sudanese Armed Forces, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sovereignty Council ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 07:19, 30 October 2019 (UTC)
Question about https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Timeline_of_the_2011%E2%80%9312_Saudi_Arabian_protests_(from_July_2012)&oldid=prev&diff=925222111
How do you fix the "|first= missing |last=" errors? Quebec99 ( talk) 17:24, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ian Cobain, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Arms trade ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 07:45, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Libyan Armed Forces, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bassingbourn ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 07:41, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Media of Libya, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Libyan Revolution ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 07:41, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
Hello,
Google Code-In, Google-organized contest in which the Wikimedia Foundation participates, starts in a few weeks. This contest is about taking high school students into the world of opensource. I'm sending you this message because you recently edited a documentation page at the English Wikipedia.
I would like to ask you to take part in Google Code-In as a mentor. That would mean to prepare at least one task (it can be documentation related, or something else - the other categories are Code, Design, Quality Assurance and Outreach) for the participants, and help the student to complete it. Please sign up at the contest page and send us your Google account address to google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org, so we can invite you in!
From my own experience, Google Code-In can be fun, you can make several new friends, attract new people to your wiki and make them part of your community.
If you have any questions, please let us know at google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org.
Thank you!
-- User:Martin Urbanec ( talk) 21:58, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lina Attalah, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Daily Star ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:18, 1 December 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for catching those
that my editor adds for me (seemingly randomly). I don't always notice when it happens. Apologies! 🌿
SashiRolls
t ·
c 19:07, 1 December 2019 (UTC)
On 3 December 2019, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article 2019 Iraqi protests, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. — Martin ( MSGJ · talk) 19:16, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
These tools help to align the date format in the articles. To let editors know the last time the tool was used, it changes the template date to the current year and month. Dawnseeker2000 17:28, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
Only you and me have expressed opinions. Do u know anyone who could finally close that move request and do the rename? 83.11.94.170 ( talk) 16:47, 7 December 2019 (UTC)
The book Book:Observational cosmology - 30h course/Preface has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Not a book
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, books may be deleted for several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{
dated book prod}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on the book's talk page.
Please consider improving the book to address the issues raised. Removing {{
dated book prod}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes still exist. The
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and the
miscellany for deletion process allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion. ‑‑
Trialpears (
talk) 19:51, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
Boud,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable
New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Fylindfotberserk (
talk) 10:30, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
Send New Year cheer by adding {{ subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.
On 14 January 2020, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Joseph Muscat, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. — Martin ( MSGJ · talk) 11:33, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
You've done something unconstructive on the article " Protests of 2019" and we're stopping you, but we don't want to bite you. If you wish to add a poltiical viewpoint that you feel may have been overlooked then please expand the text. |
Tsukide ( talk) 15:50, 16 January 2020 (UTC)
The file File:Dres polish subculture small.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
unused, low-res, no obvious use
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
files for discussion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot ( talk) 01:00, 26 January 2020 (UTC)
Thank you for contributing vital information about the novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV)! Timwi ( talk) 02:18, 26 January 2020 (UTC) |
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited General Intelligence Service (Sudan), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sovereignty Council ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 15:16, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Chen Qiushi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Weibo ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 16:08, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
The article 2020 coronavirus outbreak in Poland has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
No confirmed cases or deaths within the country. Should be recreated when/if widespread cases appear.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Prism55 (
talk) 17:50, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
Template:2019–20 coronavirus outbreak data/Europe medical cases has been nominated for merging with Template:2019–20_coronavirus_outbreak_data/International_medical_cases. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. UnitedStatesian ( talk) 02:18, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
I started an RfC concerning pointing to the template namespace in the COVID 19 navbox. You voiced an opinion about this voiced about a week ago, so please feel free to restate your opinion at Template talk:COVID-19#RfC on linking to template namespace. Bait30 Talk? 05:11, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
Hey, You have previously said that there's a button "Upload a new version of this file" on the Commons:File:COVID-19 Outbreak Cases in Poland.svg but I dont see any button like that, and there's also is a text saying "You cannot overwrite this file." So, how I can upload an updated, a newer version of that .svg picture? Thx, for help. Natanieluz ( talk) 13:26, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
Yes, you are right.
Regards -- Wiklol ( talk) 20:34, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
Hi, from this I figure you know something about tables. On 2019–20_coronavirus_outbreak the desire is to have the Template:COVID-19 testing table collapsed, and when expanded to have headings that are sortable. Unfortunately that seems technically hard, that there is a choice between either having it collapsible or having it sortable, see Template_talk:COVID-19_testing#Autocollapsing. Can you help? Sun Creator( talk) 16:13, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Hey, you often write: the ref source is/should be in one of the templates, can You tell me where (in which template this is), how You made that source and how to use it? Natanieluz ( talk) 21:45, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
~/.emacs
file I have(add-to-list 'load-path "~/.emacs.d/lisp")
(require 'edit-server)
(edit-server-start)
~/.emacs.d/lisp/
I have the edit-server.el code that does the work.
Here's a longer explanation. When I start an "edit" on Wikipedia, I see a little "edit" button at the bottom-right of my editing window; if I click on this, I get a standard emacs editing window, which has the full power of emacs, rather than just the firefox editing tools. I don't know if VE (Visual Editor) shows you the reference names; if you try edit code to at least look at the source, you'll see ref names such as MOHPL_LD8_DS5_OP1_SL1_ZP1_PD1_17Mar. The idea is that when you're looking at the full reference, you cross-check the name against the actual source of the reference; and when you're editing numbers in a table, you can add up the numbers from the name, e.g. if the references for one day include DS5 DS2 DS1, then you expect to get DS=8.An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Template:Cablegate. Since you had some involvement with the Template:Cablegate redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Guy ( help!) 18:50, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Template:WikiLeaks cable has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Guy ( help!) 18:52, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Template:Wikileaks cable. Since you had some involvement with the Template:Wikileaks cable redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Guy ( help!) 18:59, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2020 coronavirus pandemic in Poland, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Online learning ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 12:16, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
Rgarding 2020 coronavirus pandemic in Poland, I believe you are responsible for producing this insightful gnuplot graph of "SARS-CoV-2 spread in Poland and its neighbours".
The graph can be still improved:
a) Please always use the red color for the most important country, in this case: Poland b) Please arrange the countries on the graph's legend roughly in the same order as the are placed in the figure, namely, from top to bottom: DE, CZ, PL etc so that the eye need not search the entire graph to localize the next country in the graph c) remove labels from the "y" axis for the multiplicities of 2 (2, 20, 200, etc.) d) on the y axis, introduce minor tics (in gnuplot: "set mytics 10"). Their length is typically half the length of ordinary tics e) it should be possible to draw the "30% slope% curve as a dashed line. Ths would easily indicate that this curve is different in nature and does not represent any country. Also, please do remove the symbols from its ends!!! You can also reduce the line thickness for it.
Anyway, great job, this is my favorite figure for many days!
PracownikFizyczny ( talk) 09:21, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
@ Boud: Hey, can you look at [3], I'am not sure if everything is correct, there were too many info from MOHPL today, they are even correcting there own tweets. Natanieluz ( talk) 21:27, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Ythlev ( talk) 18:12, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
Template:2019–20 coronavirus pandemic data/Singapore medical cases has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Darylgolden( talk) Ping when replying 03:34, 3 April 2020 (UTC)
You did a good job summarizing all arguments and closing the RfC on discrimination in the coronavirus pandemic article. I'm impressed! - Darouet ( talk) 22:46, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
@ Boud: Hey, you often write about this Fediverse or/and Mastodon, e.g. here [4] can you provide me any examples of other gov having a server there? I'm quite interested in this, and sources/examples will be very helpful :), Natanieluz ( talk) 10:48, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
The Current Events Barnstar | ||
this barnstar is hereby awarded for all your edits at Protests of 2019. well done!! we very much need that article here. thanks for your efforts! Sm8900 ( talk) 03:42, 15 June 2020 (UTC) |
Please accept this barnstar, with my compliments. By the way, I am the Lead Coordinator at
WP:History, and also the head of
WP:Contemporary History task force. --
Sm8900 (
talk) 03:42, 15 June 2020 (UTC)
hi., what is the latest status, on the edit process or article improvement process for Protests of 2019? I have saved the latest version in my user space, at User:Sm8900/Drafts/Protests of 2019. you are welcome to work on it there, or alternately to create your own copy. could you please let me know what the current status is? I appreciate all your efforts. thanks!! -- Sm8900 ( talk) 19:12, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
Hey!
can you take care of this site
COVID-19 pandemic in Poland nad
Statistics of the COVID-19 pandemic in Poland for a few days? I will be offline until Monday or Tuesday. I will be glad if you can replace me for few days, and update that site regularly. :)
Natanieluz (
talk) 12:03, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
Category:Peacebuilding institutions has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle ( talk) 09:11, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
Category:Peace mechanism has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle ( talk) 07:42, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
@ Boud: Hello, I'm Akmaie Ajam. I need to clear up ambiguity about whether "protestor" should be corrected into "protester" or that "protestor" is correct and just an alternative to "protester". I'm confused about whether to correct it or not because you reverted my edit in the Sudanese Revolution article but not in the 2020 Belarusian protests article. Thank you. ᐱᔌᕬᐱɭᕮ ᐱᒍᐱᕬ (Talk) 08:49, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
I'd come across Eman al-Nafjan when looking for sources for Riyadh International Book Fair, whose red links (and long DYK nom on the talk page) you might find interesting. HLHJ ( talk) 02:37, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2019 Libyan local elections, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Derna.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:22, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
Thank you for creating this article, but the subject's correct first name is Phakiso. 73.71.251.64 ( talk) 20:56, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Przemysław Czarnek, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Deviance.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:42, 12 October 2020 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2020 Libyan protests, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sabha.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:12, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
https://pl.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Teatr_TrzyRzecze — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.213.46.198 ( talk) 04:38, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited European Economic and Social Committee, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page European Foundation.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:30, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
Hello
Greetings,
I visited your profile and and viewed couple of contributions. I have been supporting and looking for article expansion support for some of following.
After visiting your profile, a question came in my mind whether Wikipedia has any article on Women's role in promoting peace.
Please see do consider above topics and also help / support in expansion of those which you find interested in.
Thanks and warm regards
Bookku ( talk) 14:50, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
On 28 October 2020, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article 2020 Polish protests, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. – John M Wolfson ( talk • contribs) 16:48, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
Nice work! Thanks for making it Main Page-worthy! – John M Wolfson ( talk • contribs) 16:48, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to October 2020 Polish protests, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Elizium23 ( talk) 02:37, 2 November 2020 (UTC)
Hello and welcome Boud! Thank you for your contributions related to
Poland. You may be interested in visiting
Wikipedia:WikiProject Poland,
joining the project,
joining our discussions and
sharing your creations with our community. |
-- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 09:25, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
The article Mirosława Makuchowska has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (biographies) requirement. WP:BEFORE did not reveal any significant coverage on Gnews, Gbooks or Gscholar. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back through WP:ECHO or by leaving a note at User talk:Piotrus. Thank you.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus|
reply here 09:36, 13 November 2020 (UTC)
This request for help from administrators has been answered. If you need more help or have additional questions, please reapply the {{admin help}} template, or contact the responding user(s) directly on their own user talk page. |
This is just a ping to admins that Wikipedia:In the news/Candidates#(Ready) Ongoing: 2020 Indian farmers' protest is ready and waiting for posting either with a blurb or as Ongoing, as you see fit based on the discussion there. Boud ( talk) 00:19, 7 December 2020 (UTC)
Dear Boud, I'm concerned about the impartiality of editing when it comes to "All-polish women strike" article. It is strange you address warnings to me, and not to the user Trasz and other anonymous who constantly remove sourced information? Are the statements I added false? About relevancy: What is relevant? Statement about Suchanow can be treated as a minor detail. But I do not remove it. The acts of symbolical violence by many organizers and protesters, devastations of monuments etc. are important hallmarks of the protest. The lack of clear condemnation of the violence by organizers is also important. I cited Marta Lempart herself and added original source. So do not aim your threats to me, rather help to write an unbiased article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Semper liber sum ( talk • contribs) 18:45, 7 December 2020 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited University of La Verne, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Franchise.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:07, 19 December 2020 (UTC)
Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2021! | |
Hello Boud, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this
seasonal occasion. Spread the
WikiLove by wishing another user a
Merry Christmas and a
Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2021. Spread the love by adding {{ subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages. |
I have just discovered, through your user page, that you were the author of the famous paper applying Benford's law on the results of the 2009 Iranian election. I had read about it ten years ago. This is fascinating. Have you written on the subject ever since? Kahlores ( talk) 04:01, 26 December 2020 (UTC)
Thanks for your suggestion at grammar mistakes that I edit. Regardless of grammar question, I'm not competing with Julietdeltalima, I'm constructing edit that tells Wikipedia's openness. See this edit by Iryna Chuiko, he have no idea what he is doing when editing the page which means "changed Kiev into Kyiv 9 times". Despite the title of the show is notably called Kiev Day and Night, not Kyiv, according to sources or even in Ukrainian language, this editor invert the proper title without competent reason. You should see their edit to the subject, not grammar alone. 196.188.241.215 ( talk) 06:50, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Greetings
Requesting you to visit article Draft:Sexual politics and please do expand them if find yourself interested.
Thanks and warm regards
Bookku ( talk) 06:35, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
I restored your edits on the population of Eritrea. Since you did not engage in the discussion and preceded with doing changes without reaching consensus. Also you did several changes to include accusations of crimes supposedly committed in Tigray conflict by Eritrea. These are claims and not verified are not appropriate in that article. Leechjoel9 ( talk) 18:21, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in the Horn of Africa (defined as including Ethiopia, Somalia, Eritrea, Djibouti, and adjoining areas if involved in related disputes). Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
Doug Weller talk 16:32, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
Hey, just a reminder that when you reply to :*
, the options are :**
or :*:
. ::*
is
always wrong. (Lots of editors don't know it, and it's not the end of the world, but it is better to get it right when you can.)
WhatamIdoing (
talk) 22:35, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
Hi Boud, you added 2020 Oromo schoolyard massacre to War crimes in the Tigray War claiming genocide as whole under Tigray war crime causes controversy. it supposed to be under Ethiopia page not Tigray war crime page. to keep matter apart not associated each other. however you insisted to be appears in the page. Therefore I added the link of related massacres to signify matter related to all. Please be careful as you are editing very sensitive issues MfactDr ( talk) 00:13, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
Hi there, Boud, and welcome to Women in Red. I'm really glad to see that we can benefit from your wide experience of editing, now that you intend to spend more time on creating biographies of women. In this connection, if you have not already done so, you might find it useful to look through our Primer for creating women's biographies. Please let me know if you run into any difficulties or need assistance. Happy editing!-- Ipigott ( talk) 13:07, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
Women in Red | March 2021, Volume 7, Issue 3, Numbers 184, 186, 188, 192, 193
|
-- Ipigott ( talk) 13:07, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in the Horn of Africa (defined as including Ethiopia, Somalia, Eritrea, Djibouti, and adjoining areas if involved in related disputes). Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
Facttell ( talk) 15:42, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Eritrean Defence Forces. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Facttell ( talk) 16:45, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
Ok I've verified that Amnesty and HRW have both been criticised by governmentsSince Amnesty's and HRW's main purpose is to criticise human rights violation by governments, it's rather unsurprising that they are criticised by governments. That does not stop them from being WP:RS in the Wikipedia sense. The Eritrean government is biased in favour of the EDF and is criticised by the Universal Periodic Review for crimes against humanity.Again, please read WP:NPOV: "As a general rule, do not remove sourced information from the encyclopedia solely on the grounds that it seems biased." ... "Remove material only where you have a good reason to believe it misinforms or misleads readers in ways that cannot be addressed by rewriting the passage." (emphasis added)What you claim is misleading can be addressed by rewriting the passage. Your belief that the information "misinforms or misleads" only justifies rewriting that part of the text, not removing it. Boud ( talk) 22:17, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
Amnesty International is still trying to secure access to Tigray Regional State to conduct fact-finding on the ground, following a formal request made on 3 December 2020. Other international human rights investigators do not have formal access to Tigray either.; same page,
On 18 February, Amnesty International shared the research findings presented in this briefing with Ambassador Redwan Hussein, Ethiopia's State Minister for Foreign Affairs and Spokesperson for the Emergency Taskforce in the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, but had not received a response at the time of writing.; Human Rights Watch 5 March 2021:
Human Rights Watch provided its findings to Ethiopian and Eritrean government officials on February 18 but received no response.;
While the lack of access to conflict areas has hindered reporting on the conflict, ...It's not very convincing to say that AI has just repeated TPLF propaganda; AI has been accused of serving in the federal Ethiopian government's interest in its report on the Mai Kadra massacre - the Amnesty and EHRC reports (published so far) on the Mai Kadra massacre give very similar overviews of what happened. EHRC does have formal (legal) independence from the federal government, but (see the article), its resources (salaries, overall funding, other resources) are weak, and we don't have independent sources stating how independent the EHRC really is in practice from the federal government. The existence of the EHRC is certainly a good institutional part of federal Ethiopian structures: if it gains in respect as being independent and effective as a neutral human rights body, then it might gain in funding and other resources and contribute more in a complex human rights context. But EHRC has not yet published its report on the Aksum massacre, and it will very likely be criticised from at least some sides, and maybe by all sides, if it does its job properly. Boud ( talk) 04:11, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
Let's continue the discussion on the talkpage of EDF, I have many issues with EDF page. I am comparing the page to other DF military pages. The way the page is written and missing data or we confirm the data is in other articles. Adding everything from other articles will just make the page unreadable and confusing for other people to follow. Facttell ( talk) 22:48, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
The Tigray war data should not be repeated in the EDF article. The EDF page so far is biased against the EDF. You want to add more allegations against EDF, how does that even bring this page to NPOV? Facttell ( talk) 04:42, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
Women in Red | April 2021, Volume 7, Issue 4, Numbers 184, 188, 194, 195, 196
|
--
Megalibrarygirl (
talk) 20:15, 22 March 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red Women in Africa contest | |
Boud Thank you for your additions March 2021! - WomenArtistUpdates ( talk) 00:43, 1 April 2021 (UTC) |
Women in Red | May 2021, Volume 7, Issue 5, Numbers 184, 188, 197, 198
|
-- Rosiestep ( talk) 21:35, 28 April 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red | June 2021, Volume 7, Issue 6, Numbers 184, 188, 196, 199, 200, 201
|
-- Rosiestep ( talk) 18:49, 28 May 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
On 16 June 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article People's Peace Movement (Afghanistan), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that 27 Afghan peace activists of the People's Peace Movement were kidnapped and later freed by the Taliban in late December 2019? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/People's Peace Movement (Afghanistan). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page ( here's how, People's Peace Movement (Afghanistan)), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cwmhiraeth ( talk) 00:02, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
Women in Red | July 2021, Volume 7, Issue 7, Numbers 184, 188, 202, 203, 204, 205
|
-- Rosiestep ( talk) 16:04, 22 June 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
It appears that you have been canvassing—leaving messages on a biased choice of talk pages to notify them of an ongoing community decision, debate, or vote—in order to influence Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard#RfC: Press TV on Saudi Arabian protests. While friendly notices are allowed, they should be limited and nonpartisan in distribution and should reflect a neutral point of view. Please do not post notices which are indiscriminately cross-posted, which espouse a certain point of view or side of a debate, or which are selectively sent only to those who are believed to hold the same opinion as you. Remember to respect Wikipedia's principle of consensus-building by allowing decisions to reflect the prevailing opinion among the community at large. In particular, posting a notice only on Wikipedia Talk:Systemic bias does not appear to reflect a nonpartisan distribution in posting notifications. Thank you. — Mikehawk10 ( talk) 21:36, 26 June 2021 (UTC)
The article Society for Development and Change has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
I can't find WP:SIGCOV of this organization in multiple RS. I see some trivial mentions in reliable sources, such as The Independent, but I don't see multiple in-depth citations from reliable, independent sources. As such, I think it fails WP:GNG and WP:NGO.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion. —
Mikehawk10 (
talk) 07:06, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
Women in Red | August 2021, Volume 7, Issue 8, Numbers 184, 188, 204, 205, 206, 207
|
-- Megalibrarygirl ( talk) 22:24, 23 July 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
On 24 August 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Rukhshana Media, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Rukhshana Media is named after a young woman called Rukhshana who was stoned to death in Afghanistan in 2015? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Rukhshana Media. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page ( here's how, Rukhshana Media), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Maile ( talk) 00:02, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
peace process
Thank you for quality articles about protests for peace and human rights, and news about them in Afghanistan and elsewhere, such as Rukhshana Media, Geneva II Middle East peace conference, 2019 Iraqi protests, 2020 Polish protests and People's Peace Movement (Afghanistan), for "Battles get huge amounts of Wikipedia attention, while peace actions get much less." - you are an awesome Wikipedian!
You are recipient no. 2644 of Precious, a prize of QAI. -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 06:51, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
Thank you! -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 06:35, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
Women in Red | September 2021, Volume 7, Issue 9, Numbers 184, 188, 204, 205, 207, 208
|
-- Rosiestep ( talk) 22:29, 26 August 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red | October 2021, Volume 7, Issue 10, Numbers 184, 188, 209, 210, 211
Special event:
|
-- Rosiestep ( talk) 01:34, 29 September 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Probably not enough for an SPI, given the time passed, but does this diff from 2016 sound familiar to you? BubbaJoe123456 ( talk) 15:22, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
Hello, I am in dispute with another editor User_talk:Mooproop1#Vandalism_and_discriminatory_speech. This regards the page Menelik II. Would you look into the matter and advise? Rastakwere ( talk) 05:08, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
References
Women in Red | November 2021, Volume 7, Issue 11, Numbers 184, 188, 210, 212, 213
|
-- Innisfree987 ( talk) 21:27, 24 October 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
On 26 October 2021, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article October 2021 Sudanese coup d'état, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Indefensible ( talk) 16:08, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited October 2021 Sudanese coup d'état, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ABC.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 05:57, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
The Copyright Cleanup Barnstar | ||
I've seen you around WP:CP with a lot of helpful comments and listings. Thank you for your work there! Sennecaster ( Chat) 13:16, 16 November 2021 (UTC) |
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2020 May Kado massacre (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Dawit S Gondaria ( talk) 05:13, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
Hi there, I am writing you to ask whether you could help me with the review of the page European Partnership for Democracy, on which I've been working on so that it fits with the community standards. I would be grateful if your expertise could help me enhancing it again, if it needs to, or if you could validate the publication. Thank you in advance for your consideration. Coffeebreak12 16:18, 23 November 2021 (CET) 23
Hi Boud, thank you very much for having taken the time to answer me in the talk page of European Partnership for Democracy. I truly agree with your comments -- I've been trying to include the more external sources as possible, but unlike NED/IRI/NDI/USAID that you mentioned, the EPD is a network of NGOs relying on funding from various donors, mainly from the EU (The Secretariat support the actions of its members towards the EU institutions, both in terms of advocacy and fundraising). The only researchers that spoke about EPD are already included in the draft article. Find below some additonal sources that could help editing the article. At the EU level, EPD works in coalition with other European NGOs to work on democracy related issues of the EU - for example, recently by recommending actions on the EU Rule of Law report [1], or co-organise events with various stakeholders such as policymakers and civil society [2]. Actions on the ground are mainly about civil society support (capacity building, helping advocacy coalitions etc) and depends on the funding opportunities (EPD answers to call for proposals to this extent) and cooperation between local CSOs and governmental authorities (for example, on issues related to media development in Kyrgyzstan [3] through the project Media Dialogue. On the other hand, the approach to policy dialogue promoted by EPD (through advocacy and project) is inclusive and participatory (see a recently published paper [4] on the topic that seeks to frame policy dialogue methodogolies in international cooperation). To further answer specifically on your questions, EPD's view on digital democracy is to have democratic principles in the digital sphere, including in the rules that govern the online public sphere. EPD supports open data (through the Charter Project Africa [5]), advocates for transparency in paid add advertising (through research and advocacy [6]) to give a few examples. I did not thought of including these information before because I understood Wikipedia article standarts as primarly focused on dictionnary-like information (general and not anecdotic information to keep the article short and concise).
Best regards, Coffeebreak12 14:56, 24 November 2021 (CET)
Hi again Boud ! Thank you for your mentoring in this process -- I've included into {{reflist-talk}} my references, I hope it helps. I understand that it's relevant to provide these links to editors -- thank you by the way to redirect potentiel editors from the page of Talk Page of EPD to yours. I've been kind of struggling making it right for the past weeks, and I am really thankful for your help in this review/approval process. I mainly aim at updating the information because the current page is really out to date and provides for inacurate information. It's very interesting though to participate in the Wiki community and to get familiar with writing standards and address to one another -- a full new world for me. I remain at your disposal to provide you with any information on my edits' proposals, if any. Best, Coffeebreak12 17:36, 24 November 2021 (CET)
Hi again Boud I hope this message finds you well. I really appreciate that you started to review my changes in the page of EPD and I hope that other editors will continue reviewing my change. For the sake of love to academia and definitions, I just would like to build on your comment in the edit histoiry, saying that we should prefer the use of "democracy promotion" rather than "democracy support" -- which is a page that does not exist and is not a wide concept in your view. First, please note that in the page of Democracy promotion, it's written "can also be referred to as democracy assistance, democracy support". We at EPD use the word democracy support, because this wording defines our work more than "democracy promotion". Democracy support is a bottom up movement building on the needs of civil society in the ground, joint contextual analsysis and shared objectives. On the other hand, "democracy promotion" is connoted with the idea of an external support and influence coming from a third party regardless of policies and programmes ownership on the ground. Many international organisations such as the OECD [7] or the European Parliament [8] speak of the field with the term of "democracy support". Thanks for the discussion, hope it's interesting for you. Best, Coffeebreak12 17:31, 30 November 2021 (CET)
Hi there
Boud, thanks for the discussion on the talk page of
Democracy promotion. I would like to raise something in relation to your change in the page of EPD - you put between quotation marks the word "partnerships", to deal with the work in EU partners country. I am not sure that it is the best way to convey this idea, because it may imply irony and self denomination while it's not the case in fact. When 'EU partners countries' are named as such, it means that the actions implemented in these countries is within the framework of agreements and partnerships between the EU and third countries. For example, with the
Organisation of African, Caribbean and Pacific States, and
Eastern Partnership countries, [
[6]],
Armenia-EU Comprehensive and Enhanced Partnership Agreement. These imply joint agenda and establishment of funding priorities, hence I think you can probably remove the quotation mark.
To continue our discussion on the distinction between democracy support and promotion, these frameworks establish win-win relationships - unlike the negative history of the understanding of "democracy promotion" may imply (e.g. Iraq)
Best, Coffeebreak12 10:35, 1 December 2021 (CET)
References
{{
cite web}}
: Missing or empty |title=
(
help)
{{
cite web}}
: External link in |website=
(
help); Missing or empty |url=
(
help)
{{
cite web}}
: External link in |website=
(
help); Missing or empty |url=
(
help)
References
{{
cite web}}
: Missing or empty |title=
(
help)
References
{{
cite web}}
: Missing or empty |title=
(
help)
Women in Red | December 2021, Volume 7, Issue 12, Numbers 184, 188, 210, 214, 215, 216
|
-- Innisfree987 ( talk) 00:10, 27 November 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
(If you already know this tip, then skip over it.) I notice that you like to add archive.org/web links to citations. One request that I have is that if you are making up a citation to a website that requires a subscription to read the article (nytimes.com and independent.co.uk come to mind; though I don't recall you using those two much) that instead of using |url-status=live you instead use |url-access=subscription. When Wikipedia displays the citation, it will offer up the archived version first. Usually the archive version will access the entire article without needing a subscription. (I don't know why; maybe they have agreements with Internet Archive.) Anyway, it's something to keep an eye out for. I rarely add archived links to live pages, but I always do this for New York Times citations (because otherwise I cannot read the article).
Also, thank you for removing a "the" in front of a university name. I have long since noticed that most Americans obsessively add "the" in front of just about everything, even when it isn't necessary. Platonk ( talk) 04:57, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Ethiopia. Ue3lman ( talk) 05:02, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
Please do not attack other editors, as you did at Talk:EHRC. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. That was like the fourth or fifth similarly disrespectful tirade of yours I've read. I hope to never again read one of these. Platonk ( talk) 00:25, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
Nonsense. I'm not going to discuss or argue the WP:Systemic bias essay with you because this isn't about the other editor's edit, it is about how you handled yourself in this situation, causing me and another editor to get involved to deal with it.
Recap: You made a change to a decade-old redirect to co-opt it into a disambiguation page with a flimsy edit summary. An editor with 10-times your edit experience reverts it. That is considered a challenge to your edit. But instead of you following
WP:BRD advice ("Discuss the contribution, and the reasons for the contribution, on the article's talk page with the person who reverted your contribution. Don't restore your changes or engage in back-and-forth reverting."
) you escalate the situation by reverting them with a snide edit summary. They respond by reverting you with a matching sarcastic edit summary, you revert them and this time you demand she explain herself instead of you explaining yourself. She doesn't return to explain or answer you, but you're not done with her yet. You then post your invectives on both
Talk:Tigray War and
Talk:EHRC. You express yourself like a tantrum, call her reverts "racist", suggest she is from some "rich country" and her act of reverting your edit was "a pure case of [such] bias".
At that point you were no closer to understanding why she reverted your original edit, and despite your tirade — which was disturbing to read even though it wasn't directed at me — I offered you a perfectly logical explanation of that editor's actions that indicated no bias on their part.
So yes, you were assuming bad faith of her edits, insulting her personally, and showing your contempt for your fellow editor who you perceive as different from yourself. No, Boud, you weren't focusing on content but on that editor's person, because you were making assumptions about that editor's background and intentions.
This wasn't the first time you used these insults. The last time I recall you using these sorts of terms was in the RSN about tghat.com just two weeks ago, but I know I've read them elsewhere, too, in the last month. I wasn't able to find them yet, but in my searching I discovered other discussions as far back as the mid-2000s complaining about how you were inappropriately bandying about the term or concepts of "racist" and "bias". I highly suggest you check your personal POV at the door before entering Wikipedia editor space. And please refresh your understanding of WP:Civility and WP:PA to see how in the future you could contribute to a more pleasant editing environment within Wikipedia.
Platonk ( talk) 20:29, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
You made a change to a decade-old redirect to co-opt it into a disambiguation page with a flimsy edit summary.I disagree with "flimsy". The edit summary was just one word, but I saw no reason for there to be any controversy about switching to a disambiguation page. An edit summary does not need to be detailed if the reason is clear.
10-times your edit experienceUnreal7 vs Boud. 10 times my number of edits, true, and 47 edits per day, compared to my 3 edits per day. Less experience than me in terms of years editing. Typically smaller edits: mean edit size 132 bytes, vs me at 434 bytes.
you escalate the situation by reverting themAn experienced editor can make a mistake, especially one who edits on average 47 times a day; reverting a mistake is not an escalation. I can make mistakes too, of course.
with a snide edit summaryThere is nothing snide in "this is a world encyclopedia, not the UK encyclopedia". That is your interpretation of my brief description of statistical demographic bias in the context of the particular article being edited. The bias is well-known and there's no easy or magic solution. Here you are violating WP:AGF by adding your misinterpretation of my comment.
They respond by reverting you with a matching sarcastic edit summary,I fail to see any sarcasm in "It's not the Ethiopian one either. This is a two dabs situation." The first sentence is clear: it's a fair comment that this is not the ET.encyclopedia. The second sentence is unclear: there's no disambiguation policy that I could find that forbids having a disambiguation page point to two articles, in a situation with no obvious justification for one being the "main" article, and where either could reasonably be the article that the reader is looking for.
you demand she explain herself instead of you explaining yourself.I made a guess as to the likely outcome of consensus and opened up a discussion, inviting Unreal7 to participate if she wished to.
post your invectivesI do not see any invective in my comments; "repeated attempts" seems objective to me - where is the inaccuracy? The references to WP:BIAS and the main argument for having a disambiguation page are as above - the statistical bias is known and documented. It doesn't imply anything about the particular editor. The adjective racist is, per Wiktionary, "1. Constituting, exhibiting, advocating or pertaining to racism" or "2. Discriminatory.". This does not say anything about intentions. It's about behaviour as part of a statistical pattern by many people. The link was to the page on the statistical behaviour by large groups of editors. It said and implied nothing about intentions. Obviously, there are contexts in which "racist" refers to claims of intentional behaviour, but there's no hint of that at WP:BIAS.
So yes, you were assuming bad faith of her edits, insulting her personally,No, that's a false statement. I only described her edits as being consistent with a statistical pattern of the Wikipedia editor community in general. There were no personal insults against her.
you were making assumptions about that editor's background and intentions.No. I now see what Unreal7 says briefly about her background, and I have no reason to doubt that. At the time, I had no idea what her background was, and I made no assumption about her background; I only saw the editing events. I made no statement and implied nothing about her intentions or her background.
snideand used
invectivesin my comments is a matter of your interpretation, i.e. these are hypotheses from your side, they don't look like attempts at clarification: " First of all, consider whether you and the other editor may simply have misunderstood each other. Clarify, and ask for clarification."
Happy New Year from Women in Red Jan 2022, Vol 8, Issue 1, Nos 214, 216, 217, 218, 219
|
-- Megalibrarygirl ( talk) 16:02, 28 December 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Template:GNU social has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 ( talk) 15:05, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Hello, Boud. I seen in your WP:RM on talk page that you have purposed moving the page from 2022 Kazakh protests to 2022 Kazakh uprising, but there are clearly two arguments whether the page moved or not was divided into two sides supporting only one word, someone supporting "uprising", including you as nominator, and others who supporting page move as 2022 Kazakh unrest.
The pages you want to purpose to move have not yet created (redlink), so why not creating redirect pages ( 2022 Kazakh uprising and 2022 Kazakh unrest) in anticipation of page move consensus? 125.167.59.48 ( talk) 00:43, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Maekelay Zone § Requested move 28 January 2022. Ue3lman ( talk) 21:25, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
Women in Red Feb 2022, Vol 8, Issue 2, Nos 214, 217, 220, 221, 222
|
-- Megalibrarygirl ( talk) 15:09, 31 January 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Yo, I'm hoping we won't see any more of this nonsense from you. There isn't anything like a consensus for the change on talk and never was, and the proposal had been clearly contested at the time you tried to force it back through, and I know you knew that at the time you did this since you had already replied. Split warring is hugely disruptive and doubly inappropriate in a subject area that is under discretionary sanctions. VQuakr ( talk) 22:32, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Template:COVID-19 pandemic data/Europe medical cases has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Nigej ( talk) 16:16, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
Women in Red Mar 2022, Vol 8, Issue 3, Nos 214, 217, 222, 223, 224, 225
|
-- Megalibrarygirl ( talk) 16:37, 27 February 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
The Current Events Barnstar | ||
Awarded for efforts in expanding and verifying articles related to the 2021–2022 Russo-Ukrainian crisis and 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine. Awarded by Cdjp1 (talk) 7 March 2022 (UTC) |
The Original Barnstar | ||
Awarded for being the top contributor to an article related to the 2021–2022 Russo-Ukrainian crisis and 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine. Awarded by Cdjp1 (talk) 16:02, 8 February 2022 (UTC) |
The Working Wikipedian's Barnstar | |
Awarded for efforts in expanding multiple articles to the 2021–2022 Russo-Ukrainian crisis and 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine. Awarded by Cdjp1 (talk) 7 March 2022 (UTC) |
Thank you! Listening to the charity concert mentioned here. I created the articles of the composer and the soprano. -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 20:20, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
Now, you can also listen on YouTube, and more music, the piece by Anna Korsun begins after about one hour, and the voices call "Freiheit!" (freedom, instead of "Freude", joy). Music every day, pictured in songs. -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 15:29, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
The Prayer on the Main page, finally + new flowers -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 19:59, 23 March 2022 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing.
If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at War crimes in the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine, you may be blocked from editing. Chesapeake77 ( talk) 01:14, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Bernstein (Wikimedian) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
LaserLegs ( talk) 13:55, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
Women in Red Apr 2022, Vol 8, Issue 4, Nos 214, 217, 226, 227, 228
|
-- Megalibrarygirl ( talk) 22:44, 22 March 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
@ Dunutubble, RandomCanadian, ObsidianPotato, and Intralexical: Following the closed discussion at the Bucha massacre talk page, there remains a fundamental difficulty, though I don't see it affecting that particular page. For Bucha massacre, we already have 5 Russian references (3 reliable, 2 unreliable; and 4 Middle Eastern (reliable)), and other specific "non-NATO" sources can be discussed there if their reliability is controversial.
The broader question is that there are purely statistical analyses that show systematic differences in the probability of publishing false data by government agencies from around the world. [1] For example, the worse the Reporters Without Borders Press Freedom Index is for a country, the more statistically suspicious (on average) the country's COVID-19 pandemic daily infection count data are. [2] The results are not purely NATO vs non-NATO, since Turkey is in the list of the countries with the most statistically dubious data, i.e. (depending on which of the two analyses you look at) Algeria, Tajikistan, Turkey, Russia, Belarus, Uzbekistan. [1] [2] See Wikipedia:Reliability of open government data for the question of how Wikipedia should handle open government data (typically, numerical data), which, in principle, should be less subject to political interference, as opposed to news type information, which is more likely to be affected by political interference. The peer-reviewed research papers listed here do their primary analysis based purely on the statistical properties of the data. The consequence of these analyses is that, unfortunately, there is a difficult-to-avoid playoff between favouring reliable sources versus minimising geographical bias. The countries whose mainstream media currently dominate en.Wikipedia are those with unsuspicious COVID-19 data; this makes it difficult to work against the existing geographical bias. And in the essay, there's an open question for Wikipedia more specifically, especially for infoboxes - do we sufficiently well warn readers of the difference between official data and reliable data, especially in the case where official data is dubious? In what ways should or could we handle the specific case of official versus reliable data? Please edit the essay directly if you have any good ideas, where it will be more useful than here... Boud ( talk) 21:59, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
References
Women in Red metrics pages are bot-driven. Ideally users will not edit the page to add articles, but rely on the bot process. diff thx. -- Tagishsimon ( talk) 23:25, 17 April 2022 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sexual violence in the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Curbon7 ( talk) 07:28, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
Women in Red May 2022, Vol 8, Issue 5, Nos 214, 217, 227, 229, 230
|
-- Megalibrarygirl ( talk) 16:51, 30 April 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red June 2022, Vol 8, Issue 6, Nos 214, 217, 227, 231, 232, 233
|
-- Megalibrarygirl ( talk) 09:19, 31 May 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Thank you for your comment here, which looks helpful. I have a very vague idea about the differences between ANI and AE, and I had been wondering all the afternoon about the reason why Black Kite suggested that AE is the appropriate venue. Conciseness is not my main virtue but I think I can manage to summarise my main quarrels in 500 words. It won't be easy: it's a pattern (I argue) of incivility and tendentiousness, not a few edits. If you have any practical suggestion as to how to proceed, I'd be grateful. In any case (I imagine) it will be necessary to wait for the closure of that discussion at ANI - or am I wrong? Gitz ( talk) ( contribs) 22:46, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
Women in Red July 2022, Vol 8, Issue 7, Nos 214, 217, 234, 235
|
-- Lajmmoore ( talk) 15:45, 27 June 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
War crimes in the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine has an RFC for possible consensus. A discussion is taking place. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. Gitz ( talk) ( contribs) 11:58, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
An article that you have been involved in editing— 2022 Sri Lankan political crisis—has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. Sgnpkd ( talk) 21:37, 25 July 2022 (UTC)
Women in Red August 2022, Vol 8, Issue 8, Nos 214, 217, 236, 237, 238, 239
|
-- Lajmmoore ( talk) 10:57, 29 July 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Hi Boud. The DAB page Pokalchuk (disambiguation) is malplaced because DAB pages should be at the base name if there is no primary topic. If you don't object, I would like to move the contents to Pokalchuk and either keep it as a DAB page, or make it a surname page. What do you think? Leschnei ( talk) 18:12, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
Women in Red September 2022, Vol 8, Issue 9, Nos 214, 217, 240, 241
|
-- Lajmmoore ( talk) 15:34, 31 August 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Hello, Boud! I just wanted to thank you for the recent edits on the 2022 Ukrainian southern counteroffensive. I had evidently misread the source, so good that you recognized this and corrected it! Sometimes I should rush less when working on article updates... Applodion ( talk) 22:04, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
Women in Red October 2022, Vol 8, Issue 10, Nos 214, 217, 242, 243, 244
|
-- Lajmmoore ( talk) 14:58, 29 September 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red November 2022, Vol 8, Issue 11, Nos 214, 217, 245, 246, 247
|
-- Lajmmoore ( talk) 17:32, 26 October 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dominika Lasota until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 03:33, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
On 7 November 2022, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Ethiopia–Tigray peace agreement, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. — Amakuru ( talk) 09:57, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nadia Oleszczuk until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
The Wolak ( talk) 08:34, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
Women in Red December 2022, Vol 8, Issue 12, Nos 214, 217, 248, 249, 250
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
-- Lajmmoore ( talk) 20:53, 26 November 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 00:24, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Happy New Year from Women in Red | January 2023, Volume 9, Issue 1, Nos 250, 251, 252, 253, 254
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
-- Lajmmoore ( talk) 18:00, 27 December 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red Feb 2023, Vol 9, Iss 2, Nos 251, 252, 255, 256, 257, 259
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
-- Lajmmoore ( talk) 07:26, 30 January 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Boud, I suggest you to stop your unreasonable edit war ( WP:EDITWAR) against me in the article "Tabassum movement". Even if you're the major contributor to this article, it doesn't mean the article belongs only to you and other Wikipedia users need your permission to edit the article.
Your argument that putting all refs into Reflist is somehow much more "legible" and "easy to edit" doesn't hold water at all, because most of Wikipedia articles don't use your put-all-refs-into-Reflist format (use WP:VisualEditor instead of waging edit wars). You can put all refs into Reflist again, I don't mind it. However, if you continue to revert the whole edit ( diff) because of your individual (and, IMO, debatable) preferences, then you leave me no choice but to ask Wikipedia administrators to be involved in this case.
I repeat again: the majority of Wikipedia articles don't use your "legible" and "easy-to-edit" way of putting all refs into Reflist. Don't use it as an excuse for edit warring. Russian Rocky ( talk) 18:53, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
impossible for other editors to edit references in the "Section" mode ... other editors need to edit the whole text: incorrect: the technique is to edit in a modular way: one edit to the body section, then one edit to the references section.There is no edit war;
One of the victims was Shukria Tabassum, a nine-year-old girl.<ref name="hazarapeople" /><ref name="NYT_7Zabul_beheadings" />→
One of the victims was Shukria Tabassum, a nine-year-old girl.<ref name="hazarapeople" /><ref name="NYT_Tabassum_protest" />
One of the victims was Shukria Tabassum, a nine-year-old girl.<ref>{{cite web |last=Younas |first=Mohammad |date=2015-11-15|title=Shukria Tabassum |url=https://www.hazarapeople.com/2015/11/15/shukria-tabassum/|website=hazarapeople.com|publisher=Hazara International|access-date=2016-01-04 |archive-date=2021-06-04|archive-url=https://archive.today/HjrGt|url-status=live}}</ref><ref name="Mashal" />
<ref name="Mashal">{{cite news |last=Mashal |first=Mujib |date=2015-11-11 |title=Protest in Kabul for More Security after Seven Hostages Are Beheaded |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2015/11/12/world/asia/afghanistan-protest-taliban-isis-hazara.html |newspaper=[[The New York Times]] |access-date= 2021-06-04 |archive-url=https://archive.today/GC2Gk |archive-date=2021-06-04 |url-status=live}}</ref>(in my initial edit) corresponds with
<ref name="NYT_Tabassum_protest">{{cite news | last1= Mashal | first1= Mujib | title= Protest in Kabul for More Security after Seven Hostages Are Beheaded | date= 2015-11-11 |newspaper= [[The New York Times]] | url= https://www.nytimes.com/2015/11/12/world/asia/afghanistan-protest-taliban-isis-hazara.html |access-date= 2021-06-04 |archive-url= https://archive.today/GC2Gk |archive-date= 2021-06-04 |url-status=live }}</ref>(in your edit)
In reaction, on 11 November 2015, 2,000<ref name="NYT_7Zabul_beheadings" />–20,000<ref name="TOLO_kidnap_20" /> protestors marched→
In reaction, on 11 November 2015, 2,000–20,000<ref name = "NYT_Tabassum_protest" /><ref name="TOLO_kidnap_20" /> protestors marched
In reaction, on 11 November 2015, 2,000<ref name="Mashal" />–20,000<ref name="TOLOnews">{{cite news |date=2015-11-21 |title=Insurgents Kidnap Over 20 Bus Passengers In Zabul |url=https://tolonews.com/afghanistan/insurgents-kidnap-over-20-bus-passengers-zabul |work=[[TOLOnews]] |access-date=2021-06-04 |archive-url=https://archive.today/IaVKa |archive-date=2021-06-04 |url-status=live}}</ref> protestors marched
In reaction, on 11 November 2015, 2000<ref name="NYT_Tabassum_protest" />–20,000<ref name="TOLO_kidnap_20" /> protestors marched( diff).
negotiations were held between some of the protestors and officials on the protestors' demands for improved security measures.<ref name="NYT_7Zabul_beheadings" />→
negotiations were held between some of the protestors and officials on the protestors' demands for improved security measures.<ref name = "NYT_Tabassum_protest" />
negotiations were held between some of the protestors and officials on the protestors' demands for improved security measures.<ref name="Mashal">{{cite news |last=Mashal |first=Mujib |date=2015-11-11 |title=Protest in Kabul for More Security after Seven Hostages Are Beheaded |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2015/11/12/world/asia/afghanistan-protest-taliban-isis-hazara.html |newspaper=[[The New York Times]] |access-date= 2021-06-04 |archive-url=https://archive.today/GC2Gk |archive-date=2021-06-04 |url-status=live}}</ref>
The 11 November protest was self-managed and calm, with human chains formed at the sides of the march to leave pavements available for non-participating pedestrians.<ref name="NYT_7Zabul_beheadings" />→
The 11 November protest was self-managed and calm, with human chains formed at the sides of the march to leave pavements available for non-participating pedestrians.<ref name = "NYT_Tabassum_protest" />
The 11 November protest was self-managed and calm, with human chains formed at the sides of the march to leave pavements available for non-participating pedestrians.<ref name="Mashal" />
Women in Red Mar 2023, Vol 9, Iss 3, Nos 251, 252, 258, 259, 260, 261
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
-- Lajmmoore ( talk) 12:52, 26 February 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
. Boud, Ethiopian civil conflict (2018–present) has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the the discussion page. Petra0922 ( talk) 20:27, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
Women in Red Apr 2023, Vol 9, Iss 4, Nos 251, 252, 262, 263, 264, 265, 266
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
-- Lajmmoore ( talk) 07:51, 27 March 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Hello, I'm ElKevbo. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! ElKevbo ( talk) 22:29, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
Women in Red May 2023, Vol 9, Iss 5, Nos 251, 252, 267, 268, 269, 270
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
-- Lajmmoore ( talk) 18:27, 27 April 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red June 2023, Vol 9, Iss 6, Nos 251, 252, 271, 272, 273
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
-- Lajmmoore ( talk) 09:14, 28 May 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red June 2023, Vol 9, Iss 7, Nos 251, 252, 274, 275, 276
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
-- Lajmmoore ( talk) 07:42, 27 June 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red 8th Anniversary | |
In July 2015 around 15.5% of the English Wikipedia's biographies were about women. As of July 2023, 19.61% of the English Wikipedia's biographies are about women. That's a lot of biographies created in the effort to close the gender gap. Happy 8th Anniversary! Join us for some virtual cake and add comments or memories and please keep on editing to close the gap! |
-- Lajmmoore ( talk) 11:00, 18 July 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red 8th Anniversary | |
A piece of cake for you! Thank you for participating. |
WomenArtistUpdates ( talk) 17:53, 18 July 2023 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Muamar family detention incident until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Mooonswimmer 12:38, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
There is a new requested move discussion in progress for the Charles III article. Since you participated in the previous discussion, I thought you might like to know about this one. Cheers. Rreagan007 ( talk) 06:01, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Morbidthoughts ( talk) 08:58, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Women in Red August 2023, Vol 9, Iss 8, Nos 251, 252, 277, 278, 279, 280
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
-- Lajmmoore ( talk) 19:24, 28 July 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Two years! |
---|
-- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 06:58, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
Women in Red September 2023, Vol 9, Iss 9, Nos 251, 252, 281, 282, 283
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
-- Victuallers ( talk) 16:49, 25 August 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red October 2023, Vol 9, Iss 10, Nos 251, 252, 284, 285, 286
See also
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
-- Lajmmoore ( talk) 10:51, 29 September 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Consultative Council (Poland) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
The Wolak ( talk) 16:48, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
Women in Red November 2023, Vol 9, Iss 11, Nos 251, 252, 287, 288, 289
See also Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
-- Lajmmoore ( talk) 08:21, 26 October 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Katarzyna Pikulska until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
The Wolak ( talk) 11:45, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
— Preceding unsigned comment added by AndyTheGrump ( talk • contribs) 19:50, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. AndyTheGrump ( talk) 19:50, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
Hello. This is a message to let you know that you have made an
edit summary or a
comment that did not appear to be appropriate,
civil, or otherwise
constructive, and it may have been removed. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thank you. Please do not use edit summaries like invitation for those objecting to the anti-advocacy RfC to contribute constructively rather than complain
. We are all here to contribute constructively.
O3000, Ret. (
talk) 22:52, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
@
Boud: How goes it? Hi I saw your RFC at
WP:VPR. I'm pretty much in agreement with you. I always thought the recent limitations of google, along with the "Don't do evil" thing which went went up in smoke 2008-2009 is a good reason not to exclusively indicate its use at the find sources
template. I started using
[8] which should be on the list. Its a much more academically orientated search engine. There is specialised search engines that don't see the light of day on here. I would also like to see archives on it, for example archives.org. What is current state of the RFC. It seems a bit chaotic. It looks as though its being reformed?
scope_creep
Talk 16:56, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Women in Red December 2023, Vol 9, Iss 12, Nos 251, 252, 290, 291, 292
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
-- Lajmmoore ( talk) 20:22, 27 November 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 00:20, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Women in Red | January 2024, Volume 10, Issue 1, Numbers 291, 293, 294, 295, 296
Announcement
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
Women in Red | February 2024, Volume 10, Issue 2, Numbers 293, 294, 297, 298
Announcement
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
-- Lajmmoore ( talk 20:07, 28 January 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
A tag has been placed on Category:Jockie Soerjoprajogo songs indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 01:17, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
The redirect National Intelligence and Security Service (Ethiopia has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 February 11 § National Intelligence and Security Service (Ethiopia until a consensus is reached. Utopes ( talk / cont) 03:54, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Women in Red | March 2024, Volume 10, Issue 3, Numbers 293, 294, 299, 300, 301
Announcements
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
-- Lajmmoore ( talk 20:21, 25 February 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red | April 2024, Volume 10, Issue 4, Numbers 293, 294, 302, 303, 304
Announcements
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
-- Lajmmoore ( talk 19:41, 30 March 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Hi Boud! Thank you for your additions. Unfortunately I don't understand "reflist talk" or "Please add further discussion within this section above this 'reflist-talk' line". Do you want me to add something?
I tried to read WP:ARBECR, but I failed to unterstand it. What's that about "non EC editors may only file edit requests in AI/IP topic area"? Cheers, 93.211.218.228 ( talk) 22:53, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
Women in Red | May 2024, Volume 10, Issue 5, Numbers 293, 294, 305, 306, 307
Announcements from other communities
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
-- Lajmmoore ( talk 06:16, 28 April 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
I have been editing on WP for a long time now and I know what a copyio is. Making pointy and irrelevant edits is not a good look, suggest you desist. I will ignore, this time, that you also breached the 1R rule, removing the fact that the court did not comment twice. Selfstudier ( talk) 22:01, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
The ICC has not commented officially and has advised diplomats that it is not aware of any dramatic moves in the investigation.and your edit added
The court has not commented officially and has advised diplomats that it is not aware of any dramatic moves in the investigation.That is clearly a copyright violation. Changing "ICC" to "court" or paraphrasing does not make a copyvio into a non-copyvio. The legal risk was low, because it was only one sentence, but it was still a copyvio. The information in the edit description linking to WP:COPYVIO is for all people who check the edit history, not just you personally.To clarify other reasons for the edit, apart from the fact that the second sentence was a copyvio: WP:RELTIME was a problem; "not aware of any dramatic moves" is too vague for Wikivoice; whether Japan counts as Western world#Modern definitions is definition-dependent - the source does not say which particular G7 members attempted to influence the judges of the ICC; we don't know if the G7 diplomats are genuinely worried about disrupting ceasefire talks, so "for fear" risks talking about the diplomats' genuine thoughts (which we cannot know) rather than their statements - it's safer to say that that's the argument they presented, no matter whether they believed it or not -
amid concerns that such a move could disrupt the chances of a breakthrough in ceasefire talksis ambiguous about who has the concerns, it could be either "everybody" (implicit generally accepted knowledge) or it could be these particular diplomats who have the concerns. Boud ( talk) 07:56, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
Additionally, you must be logged-in, have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days, and are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on a page within this topic.
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{ Ctopics/aware}} template.
Selfstudier ( talk) 22:19, 29 April 2024 (UTC)