The result was WTF. An article never existed at the misspelled title of this AfD (with quotation marks in it), or the version of that title without the quotation marks.
The AfD is being closed many years later, because it was never properly closed back then, because it was never visible, because it was never transcluded on any of the daily logpages. Technically, it has still been open this whole time.
Nobody else could ever be admitted here, because this door was made only for you. I am now going to shut it. (non-admin closure) jp× g 07:02, 23 July 2022 (UTC) reply
Why keep this page just because it's Adolf Hitler's aunt? It's not even an article just a short sentance. -- Frankonno ( talk) 03:21, 28 August 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus. Courcelles 01:56, 5 September 2011 (UTC) reply
Subject appears to fail criteria at WP:BIO. According to the article, the subject was a pilot for the Russian army, but there is nothing notable in the article that differentiates that subject from the hundreds of thousands of other members of the military. Article is mostly original research; no sources could be located about the subject (at least in English) and the article's two listed sources in Russian do not appear to be reliable, third-party sources. – Dream out loud ( talk) 23:52, 28 August 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was redirect to List of Big Brother Australia housemates (2006 series)#Claire Madden. Ron Ritzman ( talk) 23:38, 4 September 2011 (UTC) reply
An Australian woman whose fame mainly came through Big Brother. Probably doesn't meet the GNG. Raymie ( t • c) 23:16, 28 August 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was withdrawn by nominator Sudo Ghost 19:09, 29 August 2011 (UTC) reply
Declined PROD. Article has been completely unsourced for five years, and it would likely be better to include any sourced information that does pop up in the Emperor Wu of Liang article. Sudo Ghost 20:55, 28 August 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman ( talk) 23:38, 4 September 2011 (UTC) reply
Country singer. Claims to have won a platinum award but provides no evidence thereof indeed no independent references for anything. — RHaworth ( talk · contribs) 22:29, 28 August 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman ( talk) 23:39, 4 September 2011 (UTC) reply
Article about an football match failing to show any notability which goes beyond routine coverage. Article is also completely unsourced, thus failing WP:V. Soccer-holic I hear voices in my head... 22:24, 28 August 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. With all due respect to Protonk's view, the last 2 !voter's argument about the subject not passing WP:GNG carry the day and the fact that it's a poorly sourced BLP is relevant. If someone finds sources not mentioned here I'll be happy to userfy or incubate this article. Ron Ritzman ( talk) 23:48, 4 September 2011 (UTC) reply
WP:REFUND'ed PROD, however the original reason No significant coverage able to be found in independent reliable sources still applies so fails WP:GNG and is still unsourced. Mt king (edits) 22:00, 28 August 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Consensus seems relatively clear, taking into account uneasiness over the sources. Ironholds ( talk) 07:46, 5 September 2011 (UTC) reply
Blatantly self-promotional article on a Nigerian political figure who might just be barely notable but quite likely isn't. No independent sources are presented. Fut.Perf. ☼ 22:02, 28 August 2011 (UTC) reply
check source http://saharareporters.com/news-page/abacha%E2%80%99s-man-leads-jonathan%E2%80%99s-campaign-us-pm-news-lagos — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ocherome ( talk • contribs) 23:25, 28 August 2011 (UTC) reply
independent sources Do a simple google search or read these articles read search for Daniel Kanu http://www.thisdaylive.com/articles/spyglass/78144/ http://newsdiaryonline.com/fooling_the_president.htm http://weekly.dailytrust.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=5209:nasarawa-state-never-had-take-off-grant-at-creation&catid=7:inside-politics&Itemid=112 http://www.independentngonline.com/DailyIndependent/Article.aspx?id=28397&print=1 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ocherome ( talk • contribs) 01:13, 29 August 2011 (UTC) reply
Here are the RS http://www.unhcr.org/refworld/country,,IRBC,,NGA,,3ae6ac1e34,0.html http://allafrica.com/stories/200807280655.html http://allafrica.com/stories/200112030428.html http://www.gidilounge.com/?p=19100 http://business.highbeam.com/3548/article-1G1-80502449/nma-asks-court-jail-daniel-kanu http://newsdiaryonline.com/fooling_the_president.htm
"...Significant national or international coverage is usually expected for an event to be notable..." — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ocherome ( talk • contribs) 21:34, 31 August 2011 (UTC) The list is endless. Ocherome ( talk —Preceding undated comment added 21:25, 31 August 2011 (UTC). reply
The result was delete. Beeblebrox ( talk) 18:35, 5 September 2011 (UTC) reply
Does not appear to meet notability criteria. Only sources provided are Apple Store entry and SakeVisual's Facebook page, neither of which are third-party sources. This game also has a GameFAQs page, but with little more information than the release date. RJaguar3 | u | t 20:09, 28 August 2011 (UTC) reply
So its been out for more than a year, as a free game that you finish playing in 10 minutes. No reviews anywhere. Cnet says its been downloaded 40 times in the past year from their download.com site. [2] Dream Focus 10:51, 29 August 2011 (UTC) reply
Delete. I fail to see how the existence of a [ GameFAQ page helps to establish notability, especially as there are no posts on the page. Even if there were posts, they are contributed by the public and cannot be considered reliable in the Wikipedia sense. Spinning Spark 11:38, 29 August 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman ( talk) 23:50, 4 September 2011 (UTC) reply
Promo article, non-notable company. Nothing in Google News. Some coverage on the web (probably enough to decline speedy, which is why I'm filing this AfD), but not enough to satisfy GNG. Miracle Pen ( talk) 20:08, 28 August 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman ( talk) 23:51, 4 September 2011 (UTC) reply
This 2010 movie ( IMDb entry) has not received significant coverage in independent, reliable sources. I cannot find any reviews of the movie nor any news articles about it. A Google News Archive search for "Summer Eleven" "Kell" (Kell is the last name of the director) retrieves two passing mentions from the Chinese publication Xinhuanet.com. Summer Eleven fails GNG. Goodvac ( talk) 19:13, 28 August 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Unsourced BLP. Ron Ritzman ( talk) 00:05, 5 September 2011 (UTC) reply
Recreated after being prodded. Actress with just a single credited role; fails WP:ENTERTAINER, no evidence of multiple significant roles, no awards, no 3rd party references etc. Tassedethe ( talk) 17:31, 28 August 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman ( talk) 23:52, 4 September 2011 (UTC) reply
A make of scooter. No evidence that it exists, still less that it is notable. Disputed prod. — RHaworth ( talk · contribs) 17:27, 28 August 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was withdrawn. ( non-admin closure) Odie5533 ( talk) 17:00, 1 September 2011 (UTC) reply
I could not find a single reference offering significant coverage of this Arcade machine. Odie5533 ( talk) 17:23, 28 August 2011 (UTC) reply
{{
cite web}}
: |archive-url=
is malformed: timestamp (
help)CS1 maint: url-status (
link)The result was delete. Ron Ritzman ( talk) 23:54, 4 September 2011 (UTC) reply
Clear failure of WP:NFOOTY, never played a professional game; no substantial 3rd party references that would pass the WP:GNG. No prejudice against recreation after he plays a game. Tassedethe ( talk) 17:19, 28 August 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus. Normally I may have gone for a relist, but since the primary point of contention here is lasting notability it seems like a good idea to just close this and re-visit the issue later when the lasting impact of this event will be more clear. Beeblebrox ( talk) 18:26, 5 September 2011 (UTC) reply
Fails WP:NEWSEVENT; while there was a spur of news hits about the attack immediately afterwards, there is no coverage beyond a few days, per WP:CONTINUEDCOVERAGE. Polar bear attacks are common in Svalbard and there is nothing warranting an article about this particular one. Arsenikk (talk) 15:32, 28 August 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman ( talk) 00:06, 5 September 2011 (UTC) reply
This topic is already covered in depth at Additive Manufacturing File Format. Wikipedia is not a reference manual or a how-to guide so this article is unnecessary and redundant. Furthermore the excessive use of HTML formatting leads me to believe that it has been copy/pasted from elsewhere. Biker Biker ( talk) 11:23, 28 August 2011 (UTC) reply
I guess the core of this issue is the statement 'perfectly describes the file format'. From a lay person point of view I'm sure you are correct. From an implementors perspective the article is actually quite sloppy. It serves (and rightly so) to provide a high level overview of what the format is about and at a basic level how it works. From an implementors perspective this is simply inadequate. There are numerous questions/details that the article does not provide information on. The reason for the additional page is to fill in those details. Brettsutton ( talk) 11:47, 28 August 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was Speedy delete g3, hoax/vandalism. NawlinWiki ( talk) 11:25, 28 August 2011 (UTC) reply
Declined speedy. An edited copy of Fascism. Appears to be a hoax. — This, that, and the other (talk) 11:12, 28 August 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. consensus is that cleanup, not deletion, is required here. ( non-admin closure) Steven Zhang The clock is ticking.... 00:25, 5 September 2011 (UTC) reply
Does not cite any references and is already mentioned in the Just Jeans/Group page. 11coolguy12 ( talk) 10:57, 28 August 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was Deleted under CSD Criteria A2 by admin RHaworth. (Non-admin close) Monty 845 23:27, 2 September 2011 (UTC) reply
Has been listed at WP:PNT for more than two weeks without any progress in translation, creator removed prod without comment Jac16888 Talk 10:15, 28 August 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was Withdrawn. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 14:21, 28 August 2011 (UTC) reply
Non-notable integer. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 08:48, 28 August 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was Withdrawn (and merged). — Arthur Rubin (talk) 14:18, 28 August 2011 (UTC) reply
Non-notable integer, per my previous {{ Prod}}. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 08:40, 28 August 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. — Cirt ( talk) 18:11, 30 August 2011 (UTC) reply
— SamiB1977 ( talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. WWGB ( talk) 13:07, 26 August 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. — Cirt ( talk) 18:11, 30 August 2011 (UTC) reply
Non-notable band. Wahwahpedal ( talk) 11:39, 20 August 2011 (UTC) reply
*Keep. The discography includes at least two albums on a major label,
Polygram, so the band passes
WP:BAND.
Eastmain (
talk •
contribs)
14:33, 20 August 2011 (UTC)
reply
The result was delete. Courcelles 01:54, 5 September 2011 (UTC) reply
spammy article on a subject that lacks significant coverage in 3rd party sources. RadioFan ( talk) 22:43, 20 August 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Courcelles 01:53, 5 September 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. I'm sorry Boucetta but the consensus here is that Techyv does not yet meet WP:WEB. Ron Ritzman ( talk) 00:10, 5 September 2011 (UTC) reply
Non-notable website. PROD was contested by the author without comment. Borderline A7, I would support a speedy if there is consensus for it here. VQuakr ( talk) 04:35, 28 August 2011 (UTC) reply
I invite you to humanize a bit your method to check the article's notability. I'll be grateful. Thanks Boucetta ( talk) 01:35, 2 September 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was Summarily deleted, before this discussion was allowed to run its normal course. A write-up about an incident of the kind alleged here has to be stripped of speculation and hearsay, and the facts would have to be far more solidly sourced. And the resulting article, if it could meet other relevant criteria, would have to be titled for, and about, the event and not any one person. Hoary ( talk) 10:42, 28 August 2011 (UTC) reply
Extreme BLP violation accusing a person of committing a heinous crime with no reliable sourcing. My db tag was removed. The Mark of the Beast ( talk) 04:22, 28 August 2011 (UTC) reply
I did not accuse him of rape. Mr. Angell has made himself a public figure in the discussion of what it means to rape and what constitutes consent. The article on him reflects that. I wrote about his being an on-the-rise viral video star because he "appeared to be" confessing to what "may have been" date rape and sparked online debate on what constitutes rape and the definition of consent. I posted the link to the actual video footage from the event in my first draft and have added more links from reputable sources: Jezebel and Huffington Post. Flamingnerd ( talk) 04:38, 28 August 2011 (UTC) reply
Both of you need to read WP:BLP1E. The Mark of the Beast ( talk) 04:40, 28 August 2011 (UTC) reply
@TMotB: I did not know that. Will copy into a textfile and edit in the sandbox (never hitting submit, just preview) if it gets deleted.
@Flamingnerd: Wikipedia notability is different from real-life notability. Unless this hits major media sources (New York Times or similar big-city papers) then it won't merit its own article. Section in rape culture? Likely; this makes more sense as a datapoint rather than a bio. Pi.1415926535 ( talk) 05:10, 28 August 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was redirect to City_of_Glen_Eira#Past_and_current_Glen_Eira_councillors and delete history per consensus. Ron Ritzman ( talk) 00:12, 5 September 2011 (UTC) reply
fails WP:BIO and WP:POLITICIAN. being a mayor does not guarantee notability. coverage is merely about her making comments in the media, rather than coverage of her as an individual. [11] LibStar ( talk) 04:05, 28 August 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Courcelles 01:52, 5 September 2011 (UTC) reply
Unsourced, not notable, blatantly written like an advertisement (to the point that none of the prose can be saved). Sven Manguard Wha? 03:02, 28 August 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was redirect to Core dump. Ron Ritzman ( talk) 00:20, 5 September 2011 (UTC) reply
Patent nonsense. It this a hoax? Fleet Command ( talk) 02:38, 28 August 2011 (UTC) reply
Let us just agree to disagree on this matter because I strongly feel that the article meets the following definition:
Content that, while apparently intended to mean something, is so confused that no reasonable person can be expected to make any sense of it. If the meaning cannot be identified, it is impossible to accurately copy-edit the text.
In fact, I brought it to AfD because I did expect some opposition. (Although I expected... Never mind.) Fleet Command ( talk) 08:12, 31 August 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was merge to Minnesota Twins minor league players. Ron Ritzman ( talk) 00:22, 5 September 2011 (UTC) reply
Subject fails WP:NSPORT and WP:GNG. Giants27( T| C) 02:37, 28 August 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was merge to Minnesota Twins minor league players. Ron Ritzman ( talk) 00:22, 5 September 2011 (UTC) reply
Subject fails WP:ATH and WP:GNG. Good faith search turns up routine coverage for a baseball player. Not opposed to a possible redirect to Minnesota Twins minor league players. Giants27( T| C) 02:34, 28 August 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus. Courcelles 01:51, 5 September 2011 (UTC) reply
The person mentioned in the story may possibly be notable - I'm quite sure her ghost is not, though, not surprisingly, the legend is used for tourism purposes. St Anselm ( talk) 01:57, 28 August 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman ( talk) 00:23, 5 September 2011 (UTC) reply
Lack of sources and overall lacks notability. Band and single in article don't have pages either. His name, likes some of the other members of a past band noted in the article, should suffice just being on the band pages. As an individual, he is not notable enough and yields very few Google hits individually. Finally, I could not find ONE Google News article on him. Blue man67 ( talk) 02:12, 21 August 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus. It may be a good idea to go ahead and have that merge discussion. Beeblebrox ( talk) 18:22, 5 September 2011 (UTC) reply
Does not appear notable. Google search Darkness Shines ( talk) 00:09, 21 August 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus with leave to speedy renominate. Ron Ritzman ( talk) 00:24, 5 September 2011 (UTC) reply
Does not appear to be notable. Lachlanusername ( talk) 07:39, 14 August 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete the whole shebang. Ron Ritzman ( talk) 00:25, 5 September 2011 (UTC) reply
alsweo nominating:
here we go again. another non notable series of kickboxing results that clearly fail WP:GNG. LibStar ( talk) 12:42, 14 August 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman ( talk) 00:27, 5 September 2011 (UTC) reply
Declined speedy deletion G11 candidate, but still would appear to fail WP:GNG. SchuminWeb ( Talk) 01:18, 28 August 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was Withdrawn per improvements. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ( Otters want attention) 16:19, 29 August 2011 (UTC) reply
Deprodded because of WP:GOOGLEHITS but i found only tangential mentions. Doesn't assert notability. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ( Otters want attention) 00:42, 28 August 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. — Cirt ( talk) 18:11, 30 August 2011 (UTC) reply
Prod contested without explanation on talk. Fail WP:MUSICBIO and fails WP:GNG. Not notable artist. Cerejota ( talk) 06:14, 14 August 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Unsourced BLP. Ron Ritzman ( talk) 00:28, 5 September 2011 (UTC) reply
Unreferenced biography of a voice actor who fails WP:ENTERTAINER. Most of the characters she's voiced aren't named, and it's not clear that the named characters are major characters. I can't find any significant coverage in reliable sources; just some primary sources confirming her credits and unreliable sources like IMDB. Pburka ( talk) 00:10, 28 August 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. — Cirt ( talk) 18:11, 30 August 2011 (UTC) reply
Cannot find any proof that this game exists. Previously nominated as hoax but contested. A search of the major game sites (allgame, GameSpot, IGN) returned nothing and a quick Google search also provided nothing. Salavat ( talk) 06:50, 21 August 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was merge to Pete Sears. Courcelles 01:49, 5 September 2011 (UTC) reply
Subject does not meet WP:BIO, with no secondary coverage, and notability is not inherited. Most of this page is lifted from subject's website. Yoninah ( talk) 07:17, 21 August 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. — Cirt ( talk) 18:11, 30 August 2011 (UTC) reply
Subject fails WP:BIO with absence of secondary coverage. Yoninah ( talk) 09:47, 21 August 2011 (UTC) reply
Delete - He may been a member of two Grammy winning bands, but there seems to be very little sources that could support a biography on Wikipedia. It's seems like nothing much has changed since it's development into an article over two years ago. SwisterTwister talk 06:58, 28 August 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. — Cirt ( talk) 18:11, 30 August 2011 (UTC) reply
This isn't a song, it's a semi well known viral video. It's not notable and the bulk of references are from YouTube. AniMate 09:40, 21 August 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Ironholds ( talk) 07:47, 5 September 2011 (UTC) reply
Autobiographical promotional article, largely unreferenced, about a writer/filmmaker of questionable notability. Book appears to be self-published (published by "CsiMec, Inc." a company run by the author). Little significant coverage from independent sources outside local press - Google search turns up a lot of primary sources, social media, and other content written by the author (such as his IMDB listing). No reliable sources found to corroborate award claims or PBS airings (only the local station appears to have run it). MikeWazowski ( talk) 16:05, 21 August 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Beeblebrox ( talk) 17:48, 5 September 2011 (UTC) reply
The only 3rd party sources are trivial mentions, or don't mention this person at all. This appears to be a non-notable local sports reporter and online commentator. The only award listed [25] is FLORIDA ASSOCIATED PRESS BEST LONG LIGHT FEATURE- A LEAGUE OF OUR OWN, plus 2 runners up, these are for local sports reporting. Not enough to to pass WP:BIO Tassedethe ( talk) 16:24, 14 August 2011 (UTC) reply
I don't feel this page should be deleted. Robert Shaw is often on Bloomberg Television and Bloomberg Radio, both of which are international. He can be found writing for both Canadian and American sports and news organizations. He can also be found on usatoday.com, in his live Q&As on the Washington Post wapo.st/oiF6xX, and often on Sirius/XM Radio. These seem like more than enough to qualify him to be featured on wikipedia. jsheldon1 ( talk) 12:22, 26 August 2011 (EST)
The result was no consensus. Courcelles 01:48, 5 September 2011 (UTC) reply
WP:CRYSTAL. Lack of sources for 2013 edition. Vanadus ( talk | contribs) 20:03, 21 August 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Courcelles 01:47, 5 September 2011 (UTC) reply
Non notable sibling of a notable person. Only reference is to PR Web. Pudge MclameO ( talk) 21:31, 28 August 2011 (UTC) reply