The result was delete. Courcelles 23:12, 27 August 2011 (UTC) reply
Declined prod. Apparently non-notable, article asserts that he's been quoted, but not that he's been covered by reliable sources. No refs. I can find quotes by him but not much about him. -- Nuujinn ( talk) 23:57, 20 August 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was merge to Ultima (series). Courcelles 23:13, 27 August 2011 (UTC) reply
Fails the general notability guideline due to an absence of third party references, because the article is attributed entirely to instruction manuals. Also fails what Wikipedia is not, because it's all in-universe information with no information on reception ( WP:NOT#PLOT), and is a pretense to list every level in the game ( WP:GAMEGUIDE, WP:NOTTRAVEL). The right kind of sources don't exist, so it's impossible to turn this from a level-by-level directory to something that explains this setting's reception and significance. Shooterwalker ( talk) 23:28, 20 August 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy delete. A7 Eagles 24/7 (C) 22:44, 20 August 2011 (UTC) reply
Contest PROD. Fails WP:ACADEMIC. No results on GS or even google. Vanadus ( talk | contribs) 22:42, 20 August 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was redirect to Basil. Courcelles 23:14, 27 August 2011 (UTC) reply
Merged with Basil Michael Goodyear ( talk) 06:46, 15 July 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was REDIRECT to school district article. postdlf ( talk) 20:36, 23 August 2011 (UTC) reply
Middle school (non-secondary school) lacking in reliable sources to establish notability. See also Common outcomes/consensus on schools; generally a Blue Ribbon school can pass the test, while a generic primary school will not, even if it happens to be named after someone famous. tedder ( talk) 18:08, 18 July 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. — Cirt ( talk) 17:33, 22 August 2011 (UTC) reply
While article does contain factual information, the premise of the article is completely subjective. That is, there is no listed source or asserted reference or basis for even labeling the set of events described in the article as a 'Mortgage GSE controversy' Cander0000 ( talk) 07:34, 19 July 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Courcelles 23:16, 27 August 2011 (UTC) reply
"known for getting 23 A grades in his Cambridge O Level exam, breaking the world record". This falls under WP:NOTNEWS and WP:BLP1E. Christopher Connor ( talk) 22:06, 20 August 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was REDIRECT to school district article. postdlf ( talk) 20:36, 23 August 2011 (UTC) reply
Middle school (non-secondary school) lacking in reliable sources to establish notability. See also Common outcomes/consensus on schools; generally a Blue Ribbon school can pass the test, while a generic primary school will not, even if it happens to be named after someone famous. tedder ( talk) 18:08, 18 July 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus. Sandstein 06:00, 28 August 2011 (UTC) reply
Old marathon runner. Notability per WP:ATHLETE questionable. Most of the sources are only result lists. bender235 ( talk) 17:06, 21 July 2011 (UTC) reply
Weak Keep - This guy has a number of borderline-notable aspects; when taken together they could probably make for a reasonable article. -- Slashme ( talk) 13:09, 24 August 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy delete as unambiguous promotion. — Joseph Fox 22:16, 20 August 2011 (UTC) reply
This article appears to be an essay, original research, and possibly a promotion for the company named in the caption for the nonexistent image. ••• Life of Riley ( T– C) 21:42, 20 August 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Courcelles 23:16, 27 August 2011 (UTC) reply
Non-notable internet radio station which does not meet WP:WEB, was deproded by User:Shortyandtheboyz MadCow257 ( talk) 21:06, 20 August 2011 (UTC) reply
Delete: No evidence that this is a notable web-radio show. -- Slashme ( talk) 13:12, 24 August 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Courcelles 23:16, 27 August 2011 (UTC) reply
The article is not much proper in order to meet its guidelines Mohamed Aden Ighe ( talk) 21:04, 20 August 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was Speedy deleted. Housekeeping closure since the article was deleted per WP:SPEEDY criteria A7 and G11. VQuakr ( talk) 00:19, 21 August 2011 (UTC) reply
Not a proper name Mohamed Aden Ighe ( talk) 20:49, 20 August 2011 (UTC) reply
I now understand with Zippy but if you get some appropriate sources, your page will be kept and will not be deleted. But it is recommended to delete it because, it explains a fan site. -- Mohamed Aden Ighe ( talk) 21:11, 20 August 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Courcelles 23:16, 27 August 2011 (UTC) reply
I cannot find any indication that this software product is notable. The article creator has stated that he does not think it has received much media coverage on the talk page. The article has previously been deleted via speedy and PROD rationales at ProjectOr. VQuakr ( talk) 18:35, 13 August 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Sandstein 06:01, 28 August 2011 (UTC) reply
Several third party links but how many even mention this plan, still less attest to its notability. — RHaworth ( talk · contribs) 20:01, 13 August 2011 (UTC) reply
____________
*Non-vote -As this Article's publisher, I will of course not vote on the matter. I would like to clarify that my ultimate goal is to produce worthy articles for the encyclopedia, and if this article does not meet the admission requirements I am not offended if it is deleted. If any editors are looking for evidence of notability, the best I have found is through Google's search engine. The words "long", "emergency" and "plan" have many millions of search results, but I have found 3rd-party references to the article's subject by searching for it in different search methods. Several of the examples would not allow links directly to the example though, so I agree that the links in this article are perhaps less then ideal. EnochHenderson ( talk) 17:54, 21 August 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Courcelles 23:16, 27 August 2011 (UTC) reply
Non-notable dentist autobiography sourced to her own website. Orange Mike | Talk 19:36, 20 August 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus. Sandstein 06:01, 28 August 2011 (UTC) reply
Non-notable: hasn't yet played a professional game. HVB648 ( talk) 17:32, 13 August 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. — Cirt ( talk) 17:35, 22 August 2011 (UTC) reply
This article is blatant WP:OR and a magnet for vanity editing. Iranian hip-hop is hip-hop in Iran. It exists and there are some acts. And that's about all that can be said from the sources presented. Guy ( Help!) 17:28, 13 August 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. — Cirt ( talk) 17:35, 22 August 2011 (UTC) reply
(This article was proposed for deletion, but that was contested by the page creator.) The article describes a neologism that has not seen use outside of a single source, which appears to be related to whoever coined the term. In addition, there is a significant POV issue, and the article would require significant rewrite to be encyclopedic. wctaiwan ( talk) 16:03, 13 August 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus. Spartaz Humbug! 07:18, 28 August 2011 (UTC) reply
Fails WP:ATH#American_football.2FCanadian_football. Has not appeared in an NFL game yet. Vanadus ( talk | contribs) 03:00, 13 August 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Courcelles 23:18, 27 August 2011 (UTC) reply
Unsourced vanity article about notable person, full of nonsense and trivia. Orange Mike | Talk 18:31, 20 August 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Sandstein 06:02, 28 August 2011 (UTC) reply
This article is not a proper source explaining, something that is not real. Mohamed Aden Ighe ( talk) 18:06, 20 August 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was Withdrawn. place has been verified. ( non-admin closure) I, Jethrobot drop me a line (note: not a bot!) 22:52, 20 August 2011 (UTC) reply
Not a very proper source Mohamed Aden Ighe ( talk) 17:56, 20 August 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Courcelles 23:18, 27 August 2011 (UTC) reply
Nominating using recent consensus of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Final Boss (electronic sports team) as precedent. As MLGPro/MajorLeagueGaming.com is a primary source see Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Video games/Sources#MLGPro as situational Teancum ( talk) 16:25, 20 August 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 07:19, 28 August 2011 (UTC) reply
WP:NN film. Findsources shows a fair number of g-hits but most are trivial. Unable to find substantial coverage in WP:RS. Related AFD: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ayana Sumoto closed as delete. Toddst1 ( talk) 15:39, 20 August 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Courcelles 23:18, 27 August 2011 (UTC) reply
WP:NOTDICT Avenue X at Cicero ( talk) 13:43, 20 August 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. No prejudice against recreation at the actual album title once there is more to say than that it is going to exist at some point. Beeblebrox ( talk) 16:36, 20 August 2011 (UTC) reply
Prod removed by author without explanation. Fails WP:NALBUMS and WP:CRYSTAL; the only source given in the article is a blog and a search for sources turned up only more blogs and forums. — KuyaBriBri Talk 18:09, 12 August 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Sandstein 06:06, 28 August 2011 (UTC) reply
WP:NOTDICT Avenue X at Cicero ( talk) 13:27, 20 August 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) Steven Zhang The clock is ticking.... 02:37, 28 August 2011 (UTC) reply
Very detailed list of a family of computer boards. In my view, it falls firmly into the link farm / directory area. — RHaworth ( talk · contribs) 13:19, 20 August 2011 (UTC) reply
"KEEP. Not strictly an encyclopedia type article, but wonderfully informative for someone (me) who has just started learning about micro processors and only know of Arduino. Computer storage is cheap. Keep it around. (user AAARONSMITH) 67.172.122.167 ( talk) 18:52, 26 August 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Courcelles 23:20, 27 August 2011 (UTC) reply
Minor government official with no indications of notability. Prod removed by author. WikiDan61 ChatMe! ReadMe!! 12:20, 20 August 2011 (UTC) reply
Please do note delete as I am still verifying information on this individual from related family. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.255.153.225 ( talk) 22:27, 23 August 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Courcelles 23:20, 27 August 2011 (UTC) reply
Unable to find any nontrivial coverage in reliable sources independent of the subject of this unsourced WP:BLP. J04n( talk page) 11:54, 20 August 2011 (UTC) reply
On account that the article has been sufficiently corrected for opposing points of view and potential biases, nomination withdrawn for Simon Chesterman, however I will press that One Nation Under Surveillance gets deleted. elle vécut heureuse à jamais ( be free) 06:42, 22 August 2011 (UTC) reply
The subject of this page created this article. About himself. This is a procedural AFD, but the rule of thumb is that if you are notable enough, someone will create an article about you — conversely, if you have to create an article about yourself, it probably means you weren't that notable anyway. I propose to either remove the wikipuffery, or delete the article entirely until someone without a COI feels motivated enough to rewrite the article. I should add the man's resume may sound impressive, but the "Asian Journal of International Law" was created in 2007 in a board meeting probably chaired by the subject himself, and only published its first issue this year. elle vécut heureuse à jamais ( be free) 11:31, 20 August 2011 (UTC) reply
The COI problem is worse than I thought -- One Nation Under Surveillance also needs to examined for deletion. elle vécut heureuse à jamais ( be free) 04:52, 22 August 2011 (UTC) reply
Comment. The article may look neutral in its current state, but we cannot trust it because we have no idea if the original author cherrypicked reviews or favourable critics. This is why I am favouring cautionary deletion until someone neutral can start it from scratch. What concerns me is that Chesterman participates in very little academic dialogue -- while he publishes books prolifically, his books have very small citation numbers, and books are subject to less peer review. elle vécut heureuse à jamais ( be free) 03:29, 22 August 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. Courcelles 23:20, 27 August 2011 (UTC) reply
Very long and unsourced list, don't know much about american "football" but it seems like List of San Francisco 49ers first-round draft picks already contains the notable aspects of this article Jac16888 Talk 10:57, 20 August 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus. Sandstein 06:17, 28 August 2011 (UTC) reply
This page does not meet Wikipedia's notability requirements.. This person does not have any notable credits that I can find anywhere, and the page has remained a stub with few sources for years.. Why keep it around Soliantu ( talk) 22:11, 5 July 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 07:20, 28 August 2011 (UTC) reply
I just PRODed this article and then realized it had already been PRODed by another editor, and dePRODed by an anon IP editor with no explanation. So we are at AfD. Appears to fail WP:NMEDIA and WP:GNG. I am unable to find any reliable source coverage of this TV show. It appears that it is just filming a pilot, which has not been picked up by any major network, and as such is too early for a Wikipedia article. ConcernedVancouverite ( talk) 14:27, 6 August 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was redirect to National_Institute_of_Technology,_Warangal#Student_activities. This AFD has been open long enough. Since Sandstein didn't think consensus was sufficient to delete this article (and it has been relisted again since then) I'm going to close this as a redirect per WP:NSUPER. Consider this a no consensus close with leave to speedy renominate. Ron Ritzman ( talk) 00:40, 27 August 2011 (UTC) reply
no evidence of notability. looks like student cruft. and original research. LibStar ( talk) 02:13, 5 August 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 07:21, 28 August 2011 (UTC) reply
This article about a corporation was prodded, but the prod was disputed by User:Chubbles citing the fifth bullet point of WP:MUSIC. This article is about neither a musician nor musical ensemble, so WP:MUSIC doesn't apply. WP:CORP does, however, and the subject of this article doesn't meet the guidelines for notability in that standard. Mikeblas ( talk) 15:23, 5 August 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus. Spartaz Humbug! 07:22, 28 August 2011 (UTC) reply
Fails WP:ATH#American_football.2FCanadian_football. Has not appeared in an NFL game yet. Vanadus ( talk | contribs) 03:02, 13 August 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. — Cirt ( talk) 17:35, 22 August 2011 (UTC) reply
Fails WP:ATH#American_football.2FCanadian_football. Has not appeared in an NFL game yet. Vanadus ( talk | contribs) 03:00, 13 August 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Sandstein 06:19, 28 August 2011 (UTC) reply
Fails WP:ATH#American_football.2FCanadian_football. Has not appeared in an NFL game yet. Vanadus ( talk | contribs) 02:57, 13 August 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus. Sandstein 06:20, 28 August 2011 (UTC) reply
Fails WP:ATH#American_football.2FCanadian_football. Has not appeared in an NFL game yet. Vanadus ( talk | contribs) 02:40, 13 August 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was merge to Material Handling Equipment Distributors Association. Ron Ritzman ( talk) 00:46, 27 August 2011 (UTC) reply
Fails
WP:GNG, no credible claim of significance, parent company doesn't have an article, etc.
CharlieEchoTango 01:33, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
reply
The result was delete. — Cirt ( talk) 17:35, 22 August 2011 (UTC) reply
Fails notability criteria for musicians. DonaldDuck ( talk) 03:01, 6 August 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus. The only !voter's "keep" rationale is sound but there's not enough participation here for a "keep" close. Ron Ritzman ( talk) 00:49, 27 August 2011 (UTC) reply
Non-notable Web series. — Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 08:39, 6 August 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus. Sandstein 05:58, 28 August 2011 (UTC) reply
Non-notable comp--PROD was denied by adding an unreliable(?) source citation. The only assertion of notability is that it is amongst the first of compilation albums from a subgenre of rock. — Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 10:54, 6 August 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was redirect to Malbec (band). Redirecting per WP:NSUPER. Consider this a no consensus close with leave to speedy renominate. Ron Ritzman ( talk) 00:53, 27 August 2011 (UTC) reply
nominated previous under BLPprod but tag was removed. Despite 23 references listed, there are no reliable secondary sources to demonstrate notability. Warfieldian ( talk) 14:34, 6 August 2011 (UTC) reply
The google link referred to above is talking about his father, Sidney Miller Jr., which is the person being referenced in that sentence. The L.A. Times link is about Malbec, the band that Sidney Miller was in, which is what is being referenced in the sentence where the reference is placed. Is there anything specific that makes it sound like a "vanity article/autobiography"? User:RandBFan1980 —Preceding undated comment added 04:05, 9 August 2011 (UTC). reply
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 07:23, 28 August 2011 (UTC) reply
Delete. Completely unreferenced BLP does not appear to meet notability requirements for biographies. Notability as a journalist has not been established. Works as an author are self-published, as article clearly states that the subject owns Mirage Publishing and publishes and markets his own books. The links are highly commercial. Article was created by Cosmicordering ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log), who is clearly the subject himself. Yworo ( talk) 14:10, 6 August 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus. Sandstein 06:23, 28 August 2011 (UTC) reply
Notability isn't even asserted--delete per WP:MUSIC/ WP:NOTABLE. This is one of several thousand compilation albums that aren't special. I gave it a Google and found nothing. — Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 17:56, 6 August 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 07:24, 28 August 2011 (UTC) reply
I am unable to find anything that shows that this software is notable. Joe Chill ( talk) 22:32, 6 August 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 07:25, 28 August 2011 (UTC) reply
Doesn't appear to pass WP:BIO. Joe Chill ( talk) 23:49, 6 August 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Courcelles 23:21, 27 August 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Sandstein 06:27, 28 August 2011 (UTC) reply
Fails GNG. No evidence of notability. Just two minor roles in 2007.-- Cavarrone ( talk) 08:44, 20 August 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Courcelles 23:22, 27 August 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. Courcelles 23:22, 27 August 2011 (UTC) reply
The following deletion proposal was submitted to deletion review, where contributors decided to list it here as a new AfD. See previous discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Braves-Mets rivalry (2nd nomination). Sandstein 08:28, 20 August 2011 (UTC) reply
I think this page should be deleted. Most of the page is a reference to the Yankees and IMO there aren't enough reliable sources to support the questionable notability of this page to exist. Arnabdas ( talk) 20:22, 15 August 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Courcelles 23:22, 27 August 2011 (UTC) reply
An Australian musician with 3 self-released singles. No reliable sources can be found. The source from www.silobreaker.com in the article redirects to a blog. Source from www.starobserver.com.au is a user created article. Fails WP:BAND. Prod was contested by creating editor. Bgwhite ( talk) 08:05, 20 August 2011 (UTC) reply
I found a site which records official positions on a national itunes chart which means it meets the criteria for the WP:BAND (Has had a single or album on any country's national music chart). Thejamisonparker ( talk) 17:21, 20 August 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Courcelles 23:22, 27 August 2011 (UTC) reply
A YouTube comedian. Only able to find one semi-reliable source. Unable to find other reliable sources. Article only has YouTube sources. Prod was contested by creating editor. Bgwhite ( talk) 07:57, 20 August 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was Speedy deleted per A7 by Versageek ( non-admin closure) Jarkeld ( talk) 12:22, 21 August 2011 (UTC) reply
This article was approved from AFC (after being declined several times) by what appears to be the subject of the article. Conflict of interest issues aside, I do not believe that the subject of this article qualifies as notable. Most of the sources are unreliable (either self-written or blogs) and the one claim to notability appears to be a sort of WP:BLP1E thing. There is also the concern that the subject is underage and I believe for their own protection should not have an article about them. Hersfold ( t/ a/ c) 05:58, 20 August 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Can be recreated if the subject becomes notable due to coverage in reliable sources. Sandstein 06:28, 28 August 2011 (UTC) reply
Another user was trying to nominate this but it kept misfiring for some reason. Anyway, not-notable software, still in development, no sources found. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ( Otters want attention) 05:47, 20 August 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Sandstein 06:30, 28 August 2011 (UTC) reply
Guus Boone fails all 9 notability criteria for academics WP:ACADEMIC, no academic position is mentioned, no indication of excellency in his field of study (or former field? no publications after 2002). There is also no indication that he might be notable in any other field. Smytegelt ( talk) 05:43, 20 August 2011 (UTC). reply
The result was keep. Sandstein 06:31, 28 August 2011 (UTC) reply
Fails WP:ATH (never played a game in the NFL) and WP:GNG. The only references that I found pertaining to his "playing for the Eagles and Patriots" is in a speech at the Haverford School ( [56]). He fails GNG undoubtedly, as I could not find sufficient coverage of him anywhere. Eagles 24/7 (C) 05:24, 20 August 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Courcelles 23:23, 27 August 2011 (UTC) reply
Doesn't appear that the term "megacomputer" is being used by anyone except the single source(deadlinked), which happens to be the organization that created the "megacomputer". Fails GNG, NEO, sourcing policy, and the bulk of the article is a direct quote.
The result was delete per consensus and as an unsourced BLP. Ron Ritzman ( talk) 00:58, 27 August 2011 (UTC) reply
Non-notable doctor. This is a CV, not a biography. Also entirely unsourced BLP. The Mark of the Beast ( talk) 04:45, 20 August 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was redirect to Ontario_Liberal_Party_candidates,_2011_Ontario_provincial_election#Eric_Davis_.28Kitchener.E2.80.94Waterloo.29. Wifione ....... Leave a message 20:12, 27 August 2011 (UTC) reply
A political candidate for the Legislative Assembly of Ontario. Fails WP:POLITICIAN. This was a disputed Prod. Bgwhite ( talk) 20:39, 12 August 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. Nomination withdrawn Wifione ....... Leave a message 20:10, 27 August 2011 (UTC) reply
Fails notability test. He is known as a critic of the Catholics and the Freemasons. The only sources that give any information about him, beyond just passing mentions, are blogs published by the two groups. If he was really notable other sources would have taken notice of him. — Preceding unsigned comment added by BigJim707 ( talk • contribs)
The Newsday article and Milwaukee-Wisconin Journal Sentinel do seem to establish notability, especially with the NYT and Anniston Star pieces behind them.
Additionally, there are plenty more sources on Google Books. Who here bothered to check there before saying there weren't any reliable sources?
It seems to me that Marrs has received " significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." Ian.thomson ( talk) 22:47, 21 August 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was Wrong venue, this should go to Redirects for Deletion. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ( Otters want attention) 03:03, 20 August 2011 (UTC) reply
These call letters have been reassigned to a 95.9 in Watseka, Illinois. As such, this article should be deleted - not kept as a redirect. The proper destination for this article title would be an article about the licensed station currently using the call letters. The fact that deletion would create a bunch of redlinks is irrelevant. Strikerforce Talk Review me! 02:53, 20 August 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. — Cirt ( talk) 17:35, 22 August 2011 (UTC) reply
Textbook WP:BLP1E. Not really notable outside a big win. All news articles come from the time of his win, and an appearance on the 1 vs. 100 mob afterward isn't really a secondary assertation of notability. Last AFD was kept due to a crapflood of WP:ITSNOTABLEs, without any policy-based discussion of any sort. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ( Otters want attention) 21:59, 6 August 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. — Cirt ( talk) 17:35, 22 August 2011 (UTC) reply
Fails WP:ATH#American_football.2FCanadian_football. Has not appeared in an NFL game yet. Vanadus ( talk | contribs) 02:39, 13 August 2011 (UTC) reply
*Delete I find the coverage to be
WP:ROUTINE from game recaps and a few sentences of his prospects in pro training camps. He is a
WP:Run-of-the-mill player not deserving of a standalone article.
WP:CRYSTAL would suggest not to speculate on future notability based on whether the undrafted player ever plays in the NFL. —
Bagumba (
talk) 08:25, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
reply
The result was keep. Wifione ....... Leave a message 19:50, 27 August 2011 (UTC) reply
Fails WP:ATH#American_football.2FCanadian_football. Has not appeared in an NFL game yet. Vanadus ( talk | contribs) 02:43, 13 August 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. Wifione ....... Leave a message 19:33, 27 August 2011 (UTC) reply
Fails WP:ATH#American_football.2FCanadian_football. Has not appeared in an NFL game yet. Vanadus ( talk | contribs) 02:44, 13 August 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. — Cirt ( talk) 17:35, 22 August 2011 (UTC) reply
Fails WP:ATH#American_football.2FCanadian_football. Has not appeared in an NFL game yet. Vanadus ( talk | contribs) 02:51, 13 August 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus. Wifione ....... Leave a message 19:30, 27 August 2011 (UTC) reply
Fails WP:ATH#American_football.2FCanadian_football. Has not appeared in an NFL game yet. Vanadus ( talk | contribs) 02:57, 13 August 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. — Cirt ( talk) 17:35, 22 August 2011 (UTC) reply
Fails WP:ATH#American_football.2FCanadian_football. Has not appeared in an NFL game yet. Vanadus ( talk | contribs) 02:59, 13 August 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. — Cirt ( talk) 17:35, 22 August 2011 (UTC) reply
A electronic engineer who has created custom guitar effects. Is planning on releasing an album. Creating editor is the subject of the article. Unable to find any reliable references. The PROD was contested. Bgwhite ( talk) 06:28, 13 August 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. — Cirt ( talk) 17:35, 22 August 2011 (UTC) reply
Does not pass WP:ORG and does not have any reliable sources to show notability. Has been tagged as needing references for three years. Crisco 1492 ( talk) 06:37, 13 August 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. — Cirt ( talk) 17:35, 22 August 2011 (UTC) reply
I can't find any significant coverage in independent reliable sources about this singer/computer/website developer. Not notable. The-Pope ( talk) 03:53, 13 August 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. — Cirt ( talk) 17:35, 22 August 2011 (UTC) reply
The two sources are both personal websites, not WP:RS; a google search for " "battle of spearhead" 1545 -"under john dudley" -"took place between the French" " produces just one hit, which is a translated wiki - ie the many Ghits all appear to be copies of the same two sources, or of two wikipedia articles, this one and Edward Clinton, 1st Earl of Lincoln. If you omit the date, you get some wargaming sites but again no Tudor battle. I suspect that it is a mistake for "Battle of the Solent" (which was in 1545), but can't find anything to confirm this. This near-orphan article does not seem to be an asset to Wikipedia. Pam D 07:44, 13 August 2011 (UTC) reply
Comment I agree that this needs to be looked at carefully. There is now extensive discussion at Talk:Battle of Spearhead and I think this should be left to run for a few days to see what comes up. I think a merge might then be best (although really only a category or two from this would be taken), with a redirect to Battle of the Solent. However, more info may turn up on the discussion page, so I think we shouldn't jump the gun and merge it yet. Boleyn ( talk) 11:53, 13 August 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus. Wifione ....... Leave a message 19:24, 27 August 2011 (UTC) reply
No third-party sources at all. The first one appears to be a source, but is in fact just a listing. Everything else is a Transformers website or other Transformers source. Black Kite (t) (c) 18:34, 13 August 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was redirect to List_of_I_Love_Lucy_episodes#Season_3. Wifione ....... Leave a message 19:21, 27 August 2011 (UTC) reply
No notability established, in spite of its status as the episode of the famous I Love Lucy. Also, no citations. I have tagged every I Love Lucy episode article with issues to resolve, but I slowly cannot wait any longer. Gh87 ( talk) 20:28, 13 August 2011 (UTC) reply
Comment. The series is patently notable and the episode was patently watched by tens and probably hundreds of millions of people in re-runs etc. Why did the episode suddenly become non notable? Just because nobody watches much now? With that many watchers do you really think a ref doesn't exist? I understand WP's sourcing requirements to demonstrate notability but also I think it unlikely this will get deleted. Szzuk ( talk) 08:24, 17 August 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Wifione ....... Leave a message 16:59, 27 August 2011 (UTC) reply
I am unable to find significant coverage for this company. It also reads like an advertisement. Joe Chill ( talk) 00:12, 20 August 2011 (UTC) reply