The result was Keep-- JForget 23:04, 22 May 2008 (UTC) reply
Today's Mexico City is not a different entity from the purported "former" Mexico City, anymore than Washington, DC is different and needs an article before it grew until it became coextensive and coterminus with the District of Columbia. They are one and the same city at different points in time. All the information here is repetitive and redundant with that already at Mexico_City#Federal_District. Moreover it is confusing to reader to suggest that there was "another" Mexico City in the past. It is also confusing as to suggest that the Federal District and Mexico City are two different entities, whereas constitutionally they are the same entity. the Dúnadan 23:58, 14 May 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was redirect to Traverse Bay Area Intermediate School District#Traverse Bay Area Career-Tech Center. Fabrictramp ( talk) 22:47, 20 May 2008 (UTC) reply
Many organizations provide a vocational partnership with a school district, this one doesn't appear notable either as a partnership or as a standalone entity. The school district doesn't appear to have its own page, nor do I think a future article would benefit from these four, unsourced, sentences. TravellingCari the Busy Bee 15:11, 8 May 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Fabrictramp ( talk) 23:18, 20 May 2008 (UTC) reply
Based on the article, this performer is NOT notable to an unusual degree. "has remained relatively unknown", "unsigned to any major record label", "vocal range and ability is not particularly noteworthy". CBHA ( talk) 16:16, 8 May 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete as WP:OR. Sandstein 06:19, 20 May 2008 (UTC) reply
The entire article reads as an opinon piece, composed entirely of original research, devoid of reliably sourced facts or assertions. Even the lists of 'democratic republic' countries are possibly redundant and replicated elsewhere; by the articles own text they are only related by their name, and thus possibly an indiscriminate list. MickMacNee ( talk) 23:52, 14 May 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. Pastordavid ( talk) 19:48, 21 May 2008 (UTC) reply
non-notable neologism, only 6 unique hits for "signed verp" on google, two of those are on wikipedia, most of the rest are for usages unrelated to the definition given on the page. There was a contested prod. There is also a merge suggestion, but I feel that the merge is not appropriate because VERP is for mailing lists, while this is more like Bounce Address Tag Validation. Wrs1864 ( talk) 12:03, 8 May 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Keep. A single that reached #22 in the US or UK charts would undoubtedly be kept at AFD: I see no reason why this one shouldn't (and per WP:CSB as well). Black Kite 10:39, 23 May 2008 (UTC) reply
Non notable single by questionably notable artist. I feel like a tourist ( talk) 19:35, 8 May 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. The discussion borders on no consensus (which would here default to no deletion in any case), but many of the early comments in favor of deletion were made prior to the substantial improvements to the article. Factoring that in, there appears to be a rough consensus to keep the article.-- Kubigula ( talk) 05:01, 21 May 2008 (UTC) reply
If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
Fails
WP:BIO. After separating out his
GoogleNews
hits, there are only three that I believe are related to him, one only mentions him, a few cite him as an author and the other two are about a poetry reading that he did. He has published poems but no awards to speak of for them.
Jauerback
dude?/
dude. 19:38, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
reply
Jauerback*I came boack to see how the debate was going. When you flagged it, I could see your point. And, indeed, flagging it has had the effect of making a lazy page creator turn this into a solid page. It now seems clesr, to me at least, that the page creator has now posted so many creditable achievements, and so many reliable sources that KEEP is a no-brainer. Interesting process and outcome. Elan26 ( talk) 01:57, 20 May 2008 (UTC)Elan26 reply
The result was delete. Seraphim♥ Whipp 23:47, 19 May 2008 (UTC) reply
non-notable neologism. slakr\ talk / 23:35, 14 May 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Keep per consensus. Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 16:47, 23 May 2008 (UTC) reply
nn album Ziggy Saw dust 23:23, 14 May 2008 (UTC) reply
What is it you feel the article needs in order for it to stay? I wouldn't waste my time doing this if it wasn't a legitiment release... Fazio ( talk) 01:10, 15 May 2008 (UTC) reply
It is listed on CDWOW with this track listing, cover, and release date, so what is the problem??? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.106.134.146 ( talk) 03:09, 18 May 2008 (UTC) reply
The only thing I want to say is that "Letter from Egypt" has NOTHING absolutely NOTHING to do with synthpop. —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
88.73.160.94 (
talk) 20:28, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
reply
The result was Delete per WP:NN -- Selket Talk 22:48, 21 May 2008 (UTC) reply
No possible assertion of notability (claims seems complete nonsense as they are practically impossible to source). Stuff that essentially could be proved appears to not satisfy WP:BIO. asenine say what? 21:58, 8 May 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. Fabrictramp ( talk) 23:54, 20 May 2008 (UTC) reply
What looks like a cross between a dictionary definition and original research/essay. Initial prod removed by author without any reason given. WebHamster 23:14, 14 May 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Seraphim♥ Whipp 23:56, 19 May 2008 (UTC) reply
Article is an unsourced biography that appears to be a hoax. I am unable to find any information that suggests the inventor of the pencil was William Brook. Nick— Contact/ Contribs 23:13, 14 May 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. Fabrictramp ( talk) 00:01, 21 May 2008 (UTC) reply
Non-notable band not meeting the requirements of WP:BAND. Article's author suggests that the given links meet the requirements but closer inspection of them reveals and short puff piece review on the new album (The Guardian), a promotional band page on NME similar to a MySpace page, the contents of which are just gig dates and a couple of trivial write-ups. The author asserts their notability on the basis of their debut album from early 2008 being on a well known indy label. WebHamster 23:09, 14 May 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Looks like he's on his way to notability, but it hasn't been demonstrated yet. Fabrictramp ( talk) 00:08, 21 May 2008 (UTC) reply
Non-notable Irish jazz musician who has just released his first album. Referenced to his own websites and by a dead link to a music award for which he was nominated. The press coverage listed on his website is trivial, so I don't see that he meets any of the criteria in WP:MUSIC. He may of course be successful enough in future to establish notability, so I wouldn't oppose recreation of the article if that happens. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • ( contribs) 23:08, 14 May 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete -- Selket Talk 22:51, 21 May 2008 (UTC) reply
Not only is the grammar poor, I can't even tell what this is supposed to be about. Certainly, no notability is asserted for the information given, and no sources are provided. Biruitorul ( talk) 23:03, 14 May 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Seraphim♥ Whipp 00:24, 20 May 2008 (UTC) reply
Completing unfinished nom for User:Shsilver. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ( Broken clamshells• Otter chirps) 23:04, 14 May 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete per WP:MUSIC. -- Selket Talk 22:52, 21 May 2008 (UTC) reply
Fails WP:MUSIC and WP:N. The only source given is the metal archives. No big tours, no notable label, no decent internet coverage. Delete Undeath ( talk) 22:16, 8 May 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Wizardman 03:04, 23 May 2008 (UTC) reply
Nom under WP:N: Non notable Idols performer. The article's claims that he is signed to various record labels are not borne out by checking the record companies' websites; Repeated attempts at talk to encourage the article's defenders to come forward with additional evidence of notability have come to nothing. Ghits are solely this article and Idols stuff. In a nutshell, an Idols participant, nothing more. AlasdairGreen27 ( talk) 22:26, 8 May 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete as failing WP:V. TerriersFan ( talk) 18:42, 20 May 2008 (UTC) reply
No proof that this even exists at all. Easily fails WP:V, WP:RS. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ( Broken clamshells• Otter chirps) 22:44, 14 May 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Wizardman 03:10, 23 May 2008 (UTC) reply
Insufficient notability per WP:MUSIC. No reliable sources to be seen, only one self released album. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ( Broken clamshells• Otter chirps) 03:42, 8 May 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Keep. I did not perceive any policy-based arguments from the Delete voters that such a list should not exist at all. Provided that a list is not dominated by red links (suggesting it is not useful for navigation), a list like this ought to be allowed to exist if it is useful. It is easy to tell if something is a German-language film, so the list inclusion criterion is obvious. Saying that films are not here which ought to be is an issue that can be fixed in the normal editing process. Over time, this list could expand to include all the German-language films that have Wikipedia articles, which I believe would satisfy the 'comprehensiveness' requirement of the Featured List criteria. EdJohnston ( talk) 18:39, 23 May 2008 (UTC) reply
Indiscriminate list that will never be complete (according to imdb there are more than 30,000 German language films). The Category:German-language films serves already the purpose of making it easy to find German language films. Novidmarana ( talk) 22:35, 14 May 2008 (UTC) reply
*Delete as
content fork due to the
List of German films article already existing and listing notable German films.
Nk.sheridan
Talk 23:34, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
reply
The result was delete. Seraphim♥ Whipp 00:26, 20 May 2008 (UTC) reply
Yet another of these articles on future albums without even a confirmed title. This one also has a reference problem and is orphaned to boot. As with the others, deletion is in order per WP:CBALL. Blood Red Sandman (Talk) (Contribs) 22:19, 14 May 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. Seraphim♥ Whipp 00:29, 20 May 2008 (UTC) reply
This individual fails notability criteria because there are very few to none non-trivial reliable sources. Almost every single source that is brought up for the article is either from non-reliable sources or sources that offer only very trivial mention of the subject. A one line sentence in a massive article about something totally different is not a solid source for an article. And an article can not be created by just lumping a bunch of trivial references together. Tmtoulouse ( talk) 22:12, 14 May 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Seraphim♥ Whipp 23:57, 19 May 2008 (UTC) reply
Player has yet to play in a fully-pro league failing notability at WP:ATHLETE -- Jimbo [online] 21:40, 14 May 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Fabrictramp ( talk) 00:10, 21 May 2008 (UTC) reply
Fails WP:Notability, WP:Verifiability and WP:Writing about fiction. Checked for sources, but didn't get very far with only 8 google hits (forums and directory entry.) Marasmusine ( talk) 21:31, 14 May 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. John254 05:15, 19 May 2008 (UTC) reply
Fails WP:BIO. No notability of small time CEO. Article is NPOV, and self-Authorship of page. All references are to articles written by himself. Businesses touted on page are completely non-notable in their own right. KelleyCook ( talk) 21:17, 14 May 2008 (UTC) reply
Clerk note: I do not recommend a non-admin close to this AfD. Closing admin: please check the talk page for the details. Thank you. SynergeticMaggot ( talk) 21:17, 18 May 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Speedy keep. Subject clearly meets WP:ATHLETE. пﮟოьεԻ 5 7 17:21, 15 May 2008 (UTC) reply
A footballer who has played in some minor league teams, but the article has no significant biographical sources and players at this level rarely achieve significant notice. Guy ( Help!) 21:14, 14 May 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Seraphim♥ Whipp 00:04, 20 May 2008 (UTC) reply
Wikipedia is not a dictionary, possible original research. Prod was removed by author without comment. J Milburn ( talk) 21:08, 14 May 2008 (UTC) reply
{{
db-self}}
tag on his user talk page underneath the
notification. ...
discospinster
talk 21:21, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
reply
The result was Speedy close and a likely trout to the nom. Incompleteneses is never a reason for deletion per WP:DEL#REASON. I have already informed the nominator of this. Non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ( Broken clamshells• Otter chirps) 20:49, 14 May 2008 (UTC) reply
It's incomplete. Buc ( talk) 20:10, 14 May 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Fabrictramp ( talk) 00:13, 21 May 2008 (UTC) reply
Recreated after a couple of speedy deletions, this fraternity exists only at one college, has 57 Google hits, many of which are false returns. Phlegm Rooster ( talk) 20:07, 14 May 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus. A straightforward disagreement as to whether this summary list is encyclopaedic. In the discussion the arguments were balanced. However, no prosed commentary is provided to give context or meaning to the table. If such added value is not included in say, the next three months, no objection could be taken to a further challenge. TerriersFan ( talk) 23:45, 23 May 2008 (UTC) reply
We have Template:NFL team season lists and Category:National Football League teams seasons for something like this. Buc ( talk) 20:05, 14 May 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Keep -- JForget 23:06, 22 May 2008 (UTC) reply
Is this really a notable enough rivalry? The article doesn't appear to have any refs the prove this and also admits it the lead that they have only been rivals for a few years. Buc ( talk) 20:03, 14 May 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Seraphim♥ Whipp 00:02, 20 May 2008 (UTC) reply
Yes, it APPEARS that this is a general service, but I don't believe it actually is. A google search for "valet seating" turns up valetseating.com (which used to have a link from this page), this wikipedia page, several pages referencing valetseating.com, and nothing else (in the first several pages of results). I don't believe valet seating is an actual service, but just a marketing term for one company. Elofgren ( talk) 20:02, 14 May 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Seraphim♥ Whipp 00:01, 20 May 2008 (UTC) reply
The CSD for the article was declined, but I still believe the band is not a notable one. The author, defending the speedy, claimed on the talk page that they are a) independent and b) have a rapidly growing fan base; going against both WP:MUSIC and WP:CRYSTAL. That is why I suggest the article be deleted. weburiedoursecrets inthegarden 20:00, 14 May 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Wizardman 03:17, 23 May 2008 (UTC) reply
No evidence this podcast is notable. Ghits are typical podcast links, no evidence of notability there either. TravellingCari the Busy Bee 19:54, 8 May 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Fabrictramp ( talk) 00:18, 21 May 2008 (UTC) reply
However prominent a figure in the music industry the article claims this fellow is, no sources substantiate it. Only 72 Google hits [18], none reliable, and no sign this fellow passes WP:BIO. Ravenswing 19:28, 14 May 2008 (UTC) Ravenswing 19:28, 14 May 2008 (UTC) reply
Object to Delete This page was created due to the fact this person is referenced on several Wiki pages (ex 1 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diversafest#Festival) but does not have a primary wiki page.
Considering most music industry pros are behind the scenes people, and the subject is found on multiple search engine pages (as well as on wiki under "Codr", "D Codr", or "Dave Codr") warrants a page for this person. There are not as many online references as more prevalent public figures receive due to the fact most of the press written on this person was written PRIOR to the internet's mainstream usage.
Just because it occurred before the web was in full effect is not a reason to remove it. I understand the policy of not creating pages for any tom dick and jane, but someone who works with and speaks to thousands of musicians across the country, has been on national TV and is known in industry circles should have a page on wiki. Just because you dont know who he is does not mean that is the case for everyone. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mamallama ( talk • contribs) 21:12, 14 May 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Speedy delete a7, website/company with no assertion of notability. NawlinWiki ( talk) 23:41, 18 May 2008 (UTC) reply
This real estate agencies article claims several sources about the subject, but I couldn't find any. Martijn Hoekstra ( talk) 19:18, 14 May 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Fabrictramp ( talk) 00:22, 21 May 2008 (UTC) reply
Completely fails WP:ATHLETE, WP:V. Jobber who wrestled a bit for an obscure pro wrestling federation. No reliable sources proffered, and none apparently extant: only three Google hits [20]. RGTraynor 19:13, 14 May 2008 (UTC) RGTraynor 19:13, 14 May 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. References added to article are passing mentions; highest amateur level would be more on the level of the Olympics. Fabrictramp ( talk) 00:26, 21 May 2008 (UTC) reply
Subject is indeed a star basketball player on Long Island, but nonetheless fails WP:ATHLETE, having neither competed in a fully professional league nor at the highest possible amateur level. RGTraynor 18:58, 14 May 2008 (UTC) reply
page has been updated with an example of athlete playing at the higest possible amateur level — Preceding unsigned comment added by Johnnyblazzin ( talk • contribs) 15:17, 15 May 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Fabrictramp ( talk) 00:27, 21 May 2008 (UTC) reply
Fails WP:ATHLETE; underage player who has not played in a fully professional league. Ravenswing 18:53, 14 May 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. John254 05:11, 19 May 2008 (UTC) reply
Delete nn athlete selected in the draft, so nn we don't know where or when he was born - red flags of non-notability- in a modern biography. And alas the article sums it up with his career highlights: "no notable achievements". Carlossuarez46 ( talk) 18:20, 14 May 2008 (UTC) reply
Conditional keep If we can find a ref to prove he was a seventh rd pick then I think it's ok. Buc ( talk) 20:08, 14 May 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. Seraphim♥ Whipp 00:19, 20 May 2008 (UTC) reply
Bio written by someone who "represents the Marketing Department at The Allen Morris Company in Miami, Florida." Unashamed COI. Is the guy notable or is it just spam? -- RHaworth ( Talk | contribs) 17:50, 14 May 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Wizardman 03:21, 23 May 2008 (UTC) reply
Non-notable term. Korny O'Near ( talk) 17:28, 14 May 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Waggers ( talk) 12:35, 23 May 2008 (UTC) reply
Though he has a nice resume, doesn't seem to make the notability cut in WP:MUSIC; no non-trivial sources of notability provided. I haven't been able to find any coverage in major media sources. Most of his credits indicate that he is part of a sound production team, versus THE producer (e.g., Butch Vig, Brian Eno, Rick Rubin). Having a song dedicated to you on a trumpeters album does not make you notable (lots of music releases have dedications to various people). Has a tiny stub entry in AllMusicGuide OhNoitsJamie Talk 17:25, 14 May 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. At present, the calls to keep are unanimous with the exception of the nominator, so there is not a consensus for deletion. That leaves me considering whether the article is in violation of core policies, and have registered that Smilerpt has found a source which is not really encyclopedia material (more a how-to guide), but a look at [22] indicates that the website this was published on has some fact-checking and reviewing before publishing things, and might be reliable enough, and the link does alleviate the worst of the WP:V concerns as well as the issues with the article being unsourced. If nothing else, it is evidence that the term is real and not made-up or original research. I am calling this a keep for now. Sjakkalle (Check!) 13:45, 23 May 2008 (UTC) reply
Where are the credible third person sources in English or Portuguese to prove notability and Google hits don't count! Dwanyewest ( talk) 21:56, 6 May 2008 (UTC) reply
My concern is not whether they are sources are in English or not its whether the sources to support the information is credible and notable observe its not that hard to grasp WP:RS, WP:N. Dwanyewest ( talk) 22:44, 6 May 2008 (UTC) reply
Unless there is credible third person sources to support statements. Otherwise delete Dwanyewest ( talk) 23:00, 6 May 2008 (UTC) reply
Here is another source but non-visual: http://www.howtodothings.com/sports-recreation/how-to-execute-the-trivela —Preceding unsigned comment added by Smilerpt ( talk • contribs) 00:09, 18 May 2008 (UTC) reply
I swear its like communicating with retards sometimes the article must have reliable sources and a cert notability read the guidelines. WP:RS, WP:N. Dwanyewest ( talk) 01:28, 18 May 2008 (UTC) reply
"retards" - I am freely trying to contribute. If my comment are not accurate that's ok, but you don't need to call the users retards! I don't really think that's the practice or either the spirit of wikipedia, is it? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.22.156.183 ( talk) 11:30, 19 May 2008 (UTC) reply
Still about the retards, I think you should read this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikiquette —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.22.156.183 ( talk) 11:35, 19 May 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete per consensus. Also deleting the recently created fork per same consensus. Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 21:32, 23 May 2008 (UTC) reply
Non notable group. Rob Banzai ( talk) 16:55, 14 May 2008 (UTC) reply
Move To Clubby Beanie Babies and remove the Beanie Baby of the Month section. Beanie Baby of the Month can be covered in a full article about the Beanie Baby Official Club article later although the language should reflect that people "could" do stuff as opposed to "can". The language of that section at the moment does read like an advert though I am sure that wasn't the intention. Jasynnash2 ( talk) 11:41, 15 May 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete - non-notable, no sources at all. Bearian ( talk) 14:16, 21 May 2008 (UTC) reply
Non-notable "development". Rob Banzai ( talk) 16:33, 14 May 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. If anyone does want to transwiki this, let me know. Seraphim♥ Whipp 23:59, 19 May 2008 (UTC) reply
Non-notable Pokemon mod. Hemlock Martinis ( talk) 16:05, 14 May 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was G11 by PeterSymonds . Non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ( Broken clamshells• Otter chirps) 16:20, 14 May 2008 (UTC) reply
Non-notable device. Reads like promotional piece. Rob Banzai ( talk) 15:47, 14 May 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was G12 by WBOSITG. Non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ( Broken clamshells• Otter chirps) 18:20, 14 May 2008 (UTC) reply
No independent sources to demonstrate notability. Biruitorul ( talk) 15:17, 14 May 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Seraphim♥ Whipp 00:17, 20 May 2008 (UTC) reply
Notability, this proprietary port is only on a select few products from a single corporation and really doesn't add anything special over other companies phone dongle products. It has hardly any edits and has been tagged as unreferenced since December 2007 KelleyCook ( talk) 15:06, 14 May 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Seraphim♥ Whipp 00:13, 20 May 2008 (UTC) reply
Non-notable 'reading initiative'. asenine say what? 14:44, 14 May 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was merge to Kamen Rider X. Information has been for the most part clumsily dumped into the parent article with the expectation that regular contributors can best trim it to essentials. -- Moonriddengirl (talk) 13:33, 23 May 2008 (UTC) reply
Just a plot summary, prohibited by WP:PLOT. Graevemoore ( talk) 18:44, 7 May 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Speedy Delete per CSD A1 and WP:SNOW
It seems to be a short play, whose dialogues and scenes are described in the article. Shovon ( talk) 13:37, 14 May 2008 (UTC) reply
The result of this AfD was Withdrawn by nom -- Ave Caesar ( talk) 13:34, 14 May 2008 (UTC) reply
:
Anti-Iranian sentiment (
|
talk |
history |
protect |
delete |
links |
watch |
logs |
views) (
delete) – (
View AfD)
Delete per
WP:NOR and
WP:NPOV.
WP:NOR clearly states than an article should "make no analytic, synthetic, interpretive, explanatory, or evaluative claims about the information found in the primary source." This article is nothing but original research.
Ave Caesar (
talk) 13:27, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
reply
The result was delete. Seraphim♥ Whipp 00:16, 20 May 2008 (UTC) reply
A online classifieds advertising website with no assertion of notability. Newly created page, main results on english language Google are only to the site itself, and a blog by the creator about developing the site. Wongm ( talk) 13:00, 14 May 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete, consensus is that the article fails the relevant notability guideline. Davewild ( talk) 21:49, 19 May 2008 (UTC) reply
Film completely lacking in any notability whatsoever. Judging by the cast list it's a home movie, and the article fails to make it clear if it's anything more than an idea. Also, contested prod. Closedmouth ( talk) 13:00, 14 May 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was nomination withdrawn. Fabrictramp ( talk) 22:03, 14 May 2008 (UTC) reply
Biography of a living person but appears to be none-notable. Justin talk 08:21, 14 May 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete, consensus is that the article fails the relevant notability guideline. Davewild ( talk) 21:43, 19 May 2008 (UTC) reply
NN, fails WP:Band. Actually, they sound quite interesting, but they've only been around six months and I can't find coverage anywhere other than YouTube/MySpace and the like Debate ( talk) 12:37, 14 May 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Waggers ( talk) 12:38, 23 May 2008 (UTC) reply
non-notable product; possibly spam or advert akaDruid ( talk) 12:34, 14 May 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. Davewild ( talk) 21:30, 19 May 2008 (UTC) reply
I found this article while working Wikipedia:Unreferenced articles, I was only able to verify one person on the list as an " Iranian Arab", so I brought it to WP:BLP. Today I removed all unreferenced names per Wikipedia:BLP#Remove_unsourced_or_poorly_sourced_contentious_material which leaves a list with one name on it. Jeepday ( talk) 11:41, 14 May 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Although there are a few calls for merging, the fact is that there is no verifiable content to merge. And to address Razorflame's concerns, all editors (anonymous and registered) are welcome to comment in XfDs, although comments not based in policy are likely to be discounted at the discretion of the closing admin. -- jonny- m t 00:08, 24 May 2008 (UTC) reply
This article created by anonymous user cites no sources whatsoever, let alone reliable third party ones. I asked for sources to be provided 1 week ago, but nothing happened. This article seems to be a fork for the one about Mihranid dynasty of Caucasian Albania. Grandmaster ( talk) 11:26, 14 May 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. Rjd0060 ( talk) 17:48, 19 May 2008 (UTC) reply
This is a pub in Wales, and that's about as much as I have been able to find about it. The pub apparently attracts a lot of tourists because it is located near Mt Snowdon, and it is listed on Geograph.org.uk. It doesn't appear to be historically significant, it's (with all due respect) just another pub. A ecis Brievenbus 09:43, 14 May 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. Rjd0060 ( talk) 17:48, 19 May 2008 (UTC) reply
Prod concern about lack of sources ( WP:V) contested by author without addressing the issue (except for removing the statement ("It will be hard to find any public information on any of the tournaments...", and he's not kidding with only 2 non-wiki google hits) . Suggest deletion on grounds of WP:V and WP:N. Marasmusine ( talk) 09:35, 14 May 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus to delete, default to keep. In future AfDs of this type, it might be better to consider the notability of each detainee individually, as it has not always been clear in this discussion whom we're talking about. That contributes to our failure to arrive at a consensus here. Sandstein 06:40, 20 May 2008 (UTC) reply
Delete Articles do not meet WP:BIO as there are no independent secondary sources. There are a few inclusions of these individuals in lists of detainees in independent sources, but no sources focus exclusively on either. These entries in Wikipedia are similar to this AfD, this AfD, and this AfD, all of which were deleted in that the military documents used to justify the above-nominated articles are not independent, secondary sources. Additionally, the deletion of the first article was endorsed after review. I've done research to find more information about the subjects of these articles; I found nothing except trivial mentions. BWH76 ( talk) 09:10, 14 May 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. Rjd0060 ( talk) 17:46, 19 May 2008 (UTC) reply
This has been tagged as a hoax, but I think it is just pre-publication advertisement. The author exists, but neither Amazon nor Google Books knows anything about his book: it clearly has not been published in any mainstream way, and so is not notable per WP:BK#Not yet published books. There are COI issues - the article author Ghenley ( talk · contribs) seems to be the author of the book. If it is published and attracts enough comment to be notable, then someone else can write an article about it, but for now delete as non-notable and advertisement. JohnCD ( talk) 08:56, 14 May 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Speedy Delete as obvious hoax vandalism ( CSD G3). — Travis talk 16:05, 14 May 2008 (UTC) reply
This started off as nonsense and now has moved into the "hoax" category, which I guess means it goes here. No evidence this exists. No google hits for common name or "scientific" name, and as was pointed out on the talk page, it seems unlikely that a snail discovered in 1833 is named "technicolor." FCSundae ∨☃ ( talk) 07:18, 14 May 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Keep. SynergeticMaggot ( talk) 12:26, 18 May 2008 (UTC) reply
Uses one promotional website as a source. The scientific articles mentioned in one section appear to be taken from this page of said site, and that they have not been read by the author can be seen by the fact that it simply says that Scientific research has investigated it - not any actual results. This is 100% pure promotion. Shoemaker's Holiday ( talk) 05:41, 14 May 2008 (UTC) reply
Delete unless we can have some WP:RS and balnce inserted in this article. Today it fails at multiple levels: WP:V, WP:NOR, WP:NPOV, WP:SOAP, WP:N. Nomen Nescio Gnothi seauton 06:29, 14 May 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Conditions to merge as noted by FCSundae have not been met. Sjakkalle (Check!) 13:59, 23 May 2008 (UTC) reply
Of all the SV Dynamo lists of titles this is probably the only one where one could debate whether to keep it or not. But ultimately, this list is again indiscrimate, as it is not clear which athlethe won which olympic medal. The latter would be necessary to establish a connection between the individual athlethe and the SV Dynamo. Even then there is little encyclopaedic value to a list of this type. Furthermore there are no citations for the claims in the list, what is problematic as the list has been written by a less than neutral and reliable editor (who has been blocked both here and on the German Wikipedia. Novidmarana ( talk) 05:34, 14 May 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete, consensus is that the article fails the notability guidelines. Davewild ( talk) 21:27, 19 May 2008 (UTC) reply
This article was originally put up for a speedy on grounds of A3, however was declined. I for one think it should still be deleted - it's a not-so-notable movie that only has presence on iMDB. Nothing out there about this, really. Dennis The Tiger ( Rawr and stuff) 05:29, 14 May 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. In response to the merge opinion, the main problem with the content is that it doesn't specify what competition they won, and that means a WP:V problem because you don't know what you are trying to verify. Hence I am declining the merge request and removing the content which appears to be the consensus wish here. Sjakkalle (Check!) 13:53, 23 May 2008 (UTC) reply
Indiscriminate and unreferenced list of world cup medals, although what exactly this list is for is never explained. What is listed is a year and a sport, but it is unclear what the relevant competition was. Furthermore the article was created by a user who is blocked both on the German and English Wikipedia and known for POV pushing in relation to SV Dynamo articles, hence all these unreferenced claims are somewhat dubious. Even if properly referenced a list of all championships of the SV Dynamo would have no encyclopaedic value, given the claim of 2187 titles this list would soon get out of hand.}} Novidmarana ( talk) 05:25, 14 May 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. I am closing with the same rationale as Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Championships of the Sports Club Dynamo. Sjakkalle (Check!) 13:55, 23 May 2008 (UTC) reply
Indiscriminate and unreferenced list of European Championships, although what exactly this list is for is never explained (Is it only for European championship, but then why are olympic medals included etc.) The only source given is the official club magazine. Given that this was former East Germany and given that the article was created by a user who is blocked both on the German and English Wikipedia and known for POV pushing in relation to SV Dynamo articles all these claims of world championships are dubious.}} Novidmarana ( talk) 05:19, 14 May 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Sjakkalle (Check!) 13:57, 23 May 2008 (UTC) reply
Indiscriminate and unreferenced list of world cup medals, although what exactly this list is for is never explained (Olympic medals? World championship? World record? No explanation in the article). The only source given is the official club magazine. Given that this was former East Germany and given that the article was created by a user who is blocked both on the German and English Wikipedia and known for POV pushing in relation to SV Dynamo articles all these claims of world championships are dubious. Novidmarana ( talk) 05:15, 14 May 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. Rjd0060 ( talk) 17:45, 19 May 2008 (UTC) reply
I'm not sure that the subject of this article is notable and the references listed don't seem to help the case for notability at all. I also don't seem to see any information about this person when I search online, but I may just not be doing a good job of looking. If someone else can find more info, please do. Thanks. Rnb ( talk) 04:26, 14 May 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Waggers ( talk) 12:41, 23 May 2008 (UTC) reply
Declined speedy. I can find no reliable sources to verify his notability, and the article (originally submitted in Greek and hastily translated with Google) reads like a resume. nneonneo talk 04:16, 14 May 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete, consensus is that the article fails the relevant notability guideline. Davewild ( talk) 21:24, 19 May 2008 (UTC) reply
Does not seem to meet notability criteria of WP:MUSIC. Kelly hi! 04:01, 14 May 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was redirect to Root (band). Nousernamesleft copper, not wood 22:23, 19 May 2008 (UTC) reply
Stubby article on an apparently limited release minidisc. No reviews could be found in a search, nor any other reliable sources. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ( Broken clamshells• Otter chirps) 18:46, 7 May 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. Rjd0060 ( talk) 17:44, 19 May 2008 (UTC) reply
Can never be completed Lego Kontribs TalkM 03:39, 14 May 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete all. MaxSem( Han shot first!) 07:55, 19 May 2008 (UTC) reply
Non-notable local football club in London. Past consensus at AfD has indicated that English football clubs down to level 10 in the football pyramid are notable, this one has never played above level 11 and appears to have no individual claim to notability over and above that. fchd ( talk) 03:23, 14 May 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Speedy delete. Non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ( Broken clamshells• Otter chirps) 03:39, 14 May 2008 (UTC) reply
While there may be merit in the creation of an article on the putative republic of Jinnahpur, this isn't it. An unencyclopedic separatist manifesto. Acroterion (talk) 03:26, 14 May 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus, which defaults to keep. I'm surprised too. Rjd0060 ( talk) 17:43, 19 May 2008 (UTC) reply
Yes, that's really the title of the article. Man, I don't quite know where to begin with this. I guess WP:SNOW is pretty obvious, as is original research. But franly, does anyone really give a rat's rear end about Utah sports teams using the letter Z frequently in their names? For that matter, does anyone care about Utah sports teams, period? (OK, I'm joking about that last part.) Anyway, this article is about an indiscriminate list of items with only a trivial connection, and pure speculation about that connection. And its title is unlikely to be searched for by any English-speaking person. Period. - Realkyhick ( Talk to me) 03:17, 14 May 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Speedily Deleted (non-admin closure) by Hut 8.5 per WP:CSD#G7. WilliamH ( talk) 19:11, 14 May 2008 (UTC) reply
Contested Prod. Not verifiable and likely hoax. No relevant google hits for this unusual, Nigerian secessionist chemist. [46] Two of the books about him listed as references do not exist. [47] [48] The other two, added more recently, [49] do not include a mention of Thomas per Amazon "Search Inside". -- Slp1 ( talk) 03:10, 14 May 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. Rjd0060 ( talk) 17:41, 19 May 2008 (UTC) reply
Non-notable software product introduced by company in existence since Jan 2008. — ERcheck ( talk) 03:03, 14 May 2008 (UTC) reply
I believe it is indeed notable, as it is in fact the only automatic screenshot taker that can upload the screenshots to an FTP server and ImageShack... Haqrefpber ( talk) 13:22, 14 May 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Keep - withdrawn by nominator (non-admin closure). nneonneo talk 17:03, 15 May 2008 (UTC) reply
It Was created by a notorious sockpuppet and it may have been part of a concerted POV campaign. Plus It relies primarily on two biased sources, only one of which can be linked to. Plus it appears to have been heavily plagarised from the main source Annoynmous ( talk) 02:09, 14 May 2008 (UTC) reply
Keep per all my lengthy discussions with the nominator and my reading and minor clean-up experience at the article. No rationale for deletion as per policy has been presented. Prashanthns ( talk) 17:56, 14 May 2008 (UTC) reply
Most of the sources in support of the sock editors agenda are concentrated in 4 places. Diana Muir's article. Jacob Lessner and :S.llan troen's book, Adam Garfinkel's book and Alan dowty. Aside from the fact that none of these people had wikipedia pages before the mysterious editor created them, they come from very biased backgrounds and couldn't really be considered notable or reliable. Adam garfinkle use to edit the conservative American interest. S.llan Troen is head hair of Israel studies at brandei university. Diana Muir, she is an historian of New England so I don't why she is qualified to speak on Israel. Plus as Eleland pointed out on the talk page, she advocates that the black checked keffiyeh is symbol of palstinian determination to destroy the jewish state. These aren't neutral sources people. I wish I could tell you more about them, but there isn't much on there pages. An indication to me that the editor new they weren't highly regarded commentators. So add that to the sock editors crimes, artificially inflating the number of sources and reling on biased and obscure academics. annoynmous 12:53, 14 May 2008 (UTC) reply
Prashanthns ( talk) 13:17, 14 May 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. Rjd0060 ( talk) 17:40, 19 May 2008 (UTC) reply
Recreated after deleted by WP:PROD. Fails WP:MUSIC w/ no WP:V or WP:RS. Jauerback dude?/ dude. 01:57, 14 May 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. There was a clear consensus that this hotel lacked sufficient notability for a standalone page. However, I see no reason not to merge the content so I will merge, as an editorial action, and make a protected redirect for GFDL reasons. TerriersFan ( talk) 18:33, 19 May 2008 (UTC) reply
Non-notable hotel that was torn down 12 years ago Ecoleetage ( talk) 01:35, 14 May 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. Rjd0060 ( talk) 17:39, 19 May 2008 (UTC) reply
Non-notable entertainer with no obvious star appeal Ecoleetage ( talk) 01:31, 14 May 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Keep. SynergeticMaggot ( talk) 12:21, 18 May 2008 (UTC) reply
A non-notable high school Ecoleetage ( talk) 01:25, 14 May 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete due to the lack of reliable sources covering the holiday. Davewild ( talk) 21:15, 19 May 2008 (UTC) reply
The non-notable "holiday" appears to be a little too unofficial Ecoleetage ( talk) 01:22, 14 May 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete, article fails the relevant notability guideline. Davewild ( talk) 21:12, 19 May 2008 (UTC) reply
No sign of notability, fails WP:BIO. Otolemur crassicaudatus ( talk) 00:58, 14 May 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Keep (non-admin closure), with notability confirmed. Rock on! Ecoleetage ( talk) 00:40, 19 May 2008 (UTC) reply
Band with no assertion of notability, fails WP:MUSIC notability criteria, no reliable sources, not to mention the unencyclopedic tone and COI editing (e.g. [56]) Stormie ( talk) 00:55, 14 May 2008 (UTC) reply
Also nominating the band's recordings:
The result was G10 as attack page by Golbez. Non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ( Broken clamshells• Otter chirps) 01:12, 14 May 2008 (UTC) reply
Not notable. Megapen ( talk) 00:52, 14 May 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. Rjd0060 ( talk) 17:38, 19 May 2008 (UTC) reply
Non-notable neologism. One Google hit (for me, results may vary). Seems to have been coined by the article creator. nneonneo talk 00:06, 14 May 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Speedy keep. This article was originally nominated by a sock puppet of an indefinitely banned user. Non-admin close. -- Dennis The Tiger ( Rawr and stuff) 15:15, 16 May 2008 (UTC) reply
Non-notable author or journalist
This is a vanity piece by a current wikipedian. It does not meet WP:BIO
The result was withdrawn by nominator. PhilKnight ( talk) 20:53, 14 May 2008 (UTC) reply
Appears to be promotional. PhilKnight ( talk) 16:21, 14 May 2008 (UTC) reply