The result was delete. slakr\ talk / 00:48, 3 June 2011 (UTC) reply
Non- notable software. No citations to reliable sources provided, and none to be found. WikiDan61 ChatMe! ReadMe!! 19:30, 26 May 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Neutrality talk 00:20, 2 June 2011 (UTC) reply
No sources available, WP:NOTSOAPBOX TransporterMan ( TALK) 23:53, 26 May 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. slakr\ talk / 00:47, 3 June 2011 (UTC) reply
Appears to be generally non-notable. To the extent that her track in an indy film is notable, and that is all that is notable, it should be mentioned in the main article and redirect to that article per WP:MUSIC (and WP:BLP1E and WP:BIO1E). Tagged for notability since 2009. Epeefleche ( talk) 23:34, 26 May 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 04:09, 3 June 2011 (UTC) reply
Delete all - three fictional characters from a failed television series. All are extended plot descriptions in violation of WP:PLOT. There are no reliable sources that discuss the real-world implications of these characters, because there are none, in violation of WP:GNG. These have been tagged for sourcing since December 2009. PRODs replaced with merge tags, but there is nothing to merge because there is no sourced information. Harley Hudson ( talk) 23:28, 26 May 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. slakr\ talk / 00:50, 3 June 2011 (UTC) reply
Subject appears to fail to meet the relevant notability guidelines ( WP:N, WP:BIO, WP:MUSIC). Tagged for notability since 2010. Epeefleche ( talk) 23:29, 26 May 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 04:11, 3 June 2011 (UTC) reply
Non-notable BLP, apparently created on the basis of a misdemeanor conviction. Not likely to ever justify a full encyclopedic biography. RxS ( talk) 23:15, 26 May 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. Neutrality talk 23:21, 1 June 2011 (UTC) reply
POV content fork of Choctaw Nation Mississippi River Clan that asserts, among other things, full sovereignty outside of the "United States corporation". Hemlock Martinis ( talk) 22:32, 26 May 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete (closing as speedy). Neutrality talk 07:11, 29 May 2011 (UTC) reply
Declined prod. Seems like original research ( WP:OR), written as a personal essay ( WP:NOT#ESSAY), not suitable content for an encyclopedia. France3470 ( talk) 21:47, 26 May 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. the delete arguments are founded on solid interpretation of policy and a search for sources and the keep arguments are not policy based and mostly from the arguments to avoid Spartaz Humbug! 04:21, 3 June 2011 (UTC) reply
This backstory of this article is somewhat complicated, so bear with me. In 2006 the article was moved from this title to Night’s Watch (different accent), but somebody copy pasted the article back. The duplication was quickly fixed and this page redirected to Night’s Watch. About a year ago I set out to clean up the articles about this fiction series, which included merging Night’s Watch and similar articles into an article called Organizations in A Song of Ice and Fire. The merged article still had a lot of problems and after seeing Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wars in A Song of Ice and Fire (2nd nomination) close as delete I decided to nominate it for AFD. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Organizations in A Song of Ice and Fire ended in delete and the closer deleted all redirects to the article, which included all of the articles I had previously merged. For some reason this redirect survived and the old 2006 copy pasted article was recently resurrected.
As it currently stands the article is a copyright violation as an unattributed copy paste move of an 5 year old version of Night’s Watch. If this article is kept it could be solved by history merging, but it would be simpler to delete this one and undelete Night’s Watch.
I think it would actually be better to just delete this article, for the same reasons as Organizations in A Song of Ice and Fire was deleted. There is zero of evidence of notability for the Night's Watch from the books. They are however getting mentions in reviews of game of Thrones episodes of the television adaption, but these contain no more than "group of dudes guarding a wall of ice" and do not establish notability. We are left with a lot of intricate detail only of interest to fans, which does not belong in wikipedia, but rather a fansite dedicated to this fictional universe. I should also mention that World of A Song of Ice and Fire#The Wall contains a short description of the Night's Watch and might be an appropriate merge/redirect target if such outcome is reached. Yoenit ( talk) 21:30, 26 May 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete , early closure per WP:SNOW. Marasmusine ( talk) 15:20, 27 May 2011 (UTC) reply
Speedy delete via AFD — Neologism unique to single game, no sources. TransporterMan ( TALK) 20:50, 26 May 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Neutrality talk 23:24, 1 June 2011 (UTC) reply
Autobiography. In response to a BLP-Prod tag, all the subject could come up with was a picture of some of his paintings in a newspaper. Not enough to meet our notability guidelines, as my own search in news ardhives only turned up false positives. Delete. Blanchardb - Me• MyEars• MyMouth- timed 20:43, 26 May 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy delete as an article that served no purpose other than promotion. JamesBWatson ( talk) 10:43, 27 May 2011 (UTC) reply
Speedy delete: Neologism not having sources. TransporterMan ( TALK) 20:35, 26 May 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 04:22, 3 June 2011 (UTC) reply
Does not meet Wikipedia requirements for notability. Doesn't seem to be any significant coverage in reliable sources. -- Demiurge1000 ( talk) 20:25, 26 May 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. slakr\ talk / 00:53, 3 June 2011 (UTC) reply
Not a notable basketball player - does not meet notability standards for college players (award winner, record holder, significant non-trivial media coverage) nor did he play in a major professional league. Now out of the game. Rikster2 ( talk) 19:11, 26 May 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy deleted per G6 by Boing! said Zebedee ( talk · contribs). Non-admin closure. — KuyaBriBri Talk 13:47, 27 May 2011 (UTC) reply
Completely unnecessary dab page as the the topics are clearly separate and distinct from eachother as well as being only partial matches to the title, see WP:PTM. A hatnote already exists at both pages which takes care of any confusion. See also Diabetes in cats and dogs also at AFD. France3470 ( talk) 18:52, 26 May 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy deleted per G6 by Boing! said Zebedee ( talk · contribs). Non-admin closure. — KuyaBriBri Talk 13:47, 27 May 2011 (UTC) reply
Completely unnecessary dab page as the the topics are clearly separate and distinct from eachother as well as being only partial matches to the title, see WP:PTM. A hatnote already exists at both pages which takes care of any confusion. See also Diabetes in dogs and cats also at AFD. France3470 ( talk) 18:51, 26 May 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was redirect to Tucson, Arizona#Primary_and_secondary_schools. Spartaz Humbug! 04:23, 3 June 2011 (UTC) reply
Another non-notable grade 6-8 school. A redirect is probably not appropriate given the school's type. Raymie ( t • c) 16:16, 26 May 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy delete. Acroterion (talk) 17:59, 26 May 2011 (UTC) reply
Neologism; no sources, possible hoax. TransporterMan ( TALK) 17:55, 26 May 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. slakr\ talk / 00:54, 3 June 2011 (UTC) reply
Non-notable Norwegian radio program with no reliable sources or significant, non-trivial coverage: WP:RPRGM. Meph talk 17:48, 26 May 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. per improvements by Ruud ( non-admin closure) v/r - T P 00:30, 3 June 2011 (UTC) reply
FAUST was created at GRAME (Centre National de Creation Musicale). Their papers and talks thus do not constitute significant independent coverage. See discussion for ChucK for comparison. FuFoFuEd ( talk) 17:48, 26 May 2011 (UTC) reply
Before someone accuses me of "deception" again, I know there's a tutorial on it at CCRMA, but it is WP:SPS. FuFoFuEd ( talk) 18:17, 26 May 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete per WP:SNOW. I know SNOW has been deprecated for AfD in general, but in this instance I think it is more important to thwart the efforts of mitbbs. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 19:13, 26 May 2011 (UTC) reply
This seems to be two unrelated incidents. It makes no sense to me to include them together on one article. Also, see somewhat related ANI discussion. Singularity42 ( talk) 17:42, 26 May 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was '. Withdrawn joe decker talk to me 17:37, 26 May 2011 (UTC) reply
WP:N I haven't been able to verify the existence of this hurling player and coach, although there is a much younger player of the same name. The coaching stints look quite notable, but without a source that isn't a wikimirror, I'm stuck. The author hasn't replied to previous attempts to ask for help in sourcing, but I'll make sure they're informed in this nomination. Additional sources welcomed as always. joe decker talk to me 17:35, 26 May 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. slakr\ talk / 00:55, 3 June 2011 (UTC) reply
Contested proposed deletion. Unambiguous advertising for a software development firm for visual communication applications, commonly referred to as digital signage:
for a non-notable business. References provided refer to press release style stories announcing new product versions; and to inclusions in various Top 5000, 500, 100 lists; none of those references establish genuine notability, much less a significant effect on history, technology, or culture. The article contains an entirely unreferenced but quite elaborate company history, suggesting that this article was originated by an insider at the business. Yet another tech firm advertising on Wikipedia. Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 17:28, 26 May 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. slakr\ talk / 00:55, 3 June 2011 (UTC) reply
non-notable, does not meet WP:BIO or any other standard, as per standard searches Nomoskedasticity ( talk) 17:24, 26 May 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was merge to List of minor Marvel Comics characters. Spartaz Humbug! 04:24, 3 June 2011 (UTC) reply
Fails WP:GNG - no significant coverage in multiple reliable third party sources. [[User:Anthem of joy|Anthem]] ( talk) 17:13, 26 May 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. slakr\ talk / 00:56, 3 June 2011 (UTC) reply
Non-notable individual, fails WP:BIO, paucity of sources, nothing even close to establishing notability under any standard. Nomoskedasticity ( talk) 17:03, 26 May 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. slakr\ talk / 01:23, 3 June 2011 (UTC) reply
Fails WP:GNG, and violates our guidelines on coverage of fiction. Merging of content seems an unlikely solution as the list List of Mobile Suit Gundam SEED mobile weapons has been deleted via a discussion. There is no significant coverage in reliable third party sources. Anthem of joy ( talk) 17:02, 26 May 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was SNOW delete , which I'm going to implement as a protected redirect to Sola scriptura, as appropriate for a POV fork. Jclemens ( talk) 01:25, 29 May 2011 (UTC) reply
This appears to be an unnecessary conceptual fork from Christianity and has been deleted twice as promotional. Raising for discussion as to any possible future credibility to a claim that this might be considered notable, verifiable or might be re-written in a neutral tone in the near future. Considering the repeated resurrection, salting may be in order. Fæ ( talk) 16:42, 26 May 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. Non-admin closure. Roscelese ( talk ⋅ contribs) 18:38, 2 June 2011 (UTC) reply
Article is a news item, which lacks ongoing notability. Armbrust Talk to me Contribs 16:38, 26 May 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. Non-admin closure. Roscelese ( talk ⋅ contribs) 18:33, 2 June 2011 (UTC) reply
Article is a news item, which lacks ongoing notability. Armbrust Talk to me Contribs 16:38, 26 May 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. Non-admin closure. Roscelese ( talk ⋅ contribs) 18:31, 2 June 2011 (UTC) reply
Article is a news item, which lacks ongoing notability. Furthermore there was no damage or casualties. Armbrust Talk to me Contribs 16:25, 26 May 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Neutrality talk 23:28, 1 June 2011 (UTC) reply
Non-notable college football poll that existed for four years and no longer does. The members of the poll are non-notable (as far as I can tell) college football fans with no ties to the media or to NCAA programs. X96lee15 ( talk) 16:22, 26 May 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman ( talk) 00:33, 2 June 2011 (UTC) reply
Non-notable amateur film, no sources available on quick check. TransporterMan ( TALK) 16:08, 26 May 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. Non-admin closure. Roscelese ( talk ⋅ contribs) 18:25, 2 June 2011 (UTC) reply
Article is a news item, which lacks ongoing notability. Armbrust Talk to me Contribs 15:57, 26 May 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. I'm sorry ZGBradley. I have no doubt that you and your classmates have fun playing this game but it's not verifiable outside the circle of you and your friends. Ron Ritzman ( talk) 00:40, 2 June 2011 (UTC) reply
Subject is a game created by an 8th grade class in 2011. Lots of confusing Ghits but none that I cold find about this particular game. PROD was removed without improvement or pertinent rationale. Concern was: Not notable - See WP:MADEUP, WP:GNG. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง ( talk) 13:45, 26 May 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was Moot. Since this whole AFD is completly tainted by socking I'm calling it void. Spartaz Humbug! 04:27, 3 June 2011 (UTC) reply
A whole myriad of television news theme articles were deleted in July 2010 (see: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The X-2 Package. I cannot see how this differs from any of the other ones that were deleted. Also if it has any real significance, it should have a bit more mention than being listed on a laundry list on the Television news music page. This is of course ignoring the fact that the article seems to be written from a fanboy perspective and includes the complete lyrics to the theme song (an obvious copyright violation) as well as a dearth of sources. If anything, it should maybe have a brief mention on the TV stations that use the theme song's pages, but that is it. Rageholic Filled With Rageahol ( talk) 13:45, 26 May 2011 (UTC) reply
*Delete - Not notable without substantial coverage in independent reliable sources. None provided, none found. All sources I have found are either from the production company and/or distributor, pages of limited utility from the stations themselves (mostly bare mentions), download sites (likely copyright vios with no helpful info) and blogs/forums. Withholding my !vote until the new info (below) plays out. -
SummerPhD (
talk) 03:49, 27 May 2011 (UTC) See below. -
SummerPhD (
talk) 02:20, 28 May 2011 (UTC)
reply
*Delete Not enough importance to justify this article or this level of silly debate, especially the exchange between the two guys arguing what the sources really say. There are a lot of google hits for this bit of cheesy 70s music, but hardly any of them seem to be reputable consisting mainly of anorak websites and the like. There seems to be some mention in various text books and what appears to be contemporary references to the song (not sure the proper name of what to call it - song? theme? album?), but they seem to be drive by references that just mention the name of the music with "Critiquing radio and television content"
[49] and "Inside local television news"
[50] seeming to use the idea of "Move closer to your world" as a branding/promotional slogan that is consistently used by a TV station and not a specific piece of music, something made clear by the context. They would be very good sources if they actually talked about the use of the music and not the use of slogans. You two guys are both right and wrong at the same time, it is kind of cute. Still there is nothing that seems to show the notability of this bit of music except by those who seem to have an obsession for such minutiae that would Mr. Neville Shunt's delusional enthusiasm for railway timetables. Railway timetables most likely have a greater cultural impact on the world than this little bit of moldy 1970s cheese.
DCMA Takedown Notice to Follow Shortly (
talk) 02:26, 1 June 2011 (UTC)—
DCMA Takedown Notice to Follow Shortly (
talk •
contribs) has made
few or no other edits outside this topic. blocked as a sock of Rageholic Filled with Ragehol (see
Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Rageholic_Filled_With_Rageahol)
reply
The result was delete. slakr\ talk / 00:59, 3 June 2011 (UTC) reply
Does not meet notability criteria. Clicriffhard ( talk) 13:27, 26 May 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was Speedy delete a7, no assertion of notability per WP:MUSIC. NawlinWiki ( talk) 13:19, 26 May 2011 (UTC) reply
This article is an extremely well-written autobiography, and I hope this AfD does not scare off the editor from contributing further to Wikipedia. Ultimately, however, there are no reliable sources that can support this subject meeting WP:MUSICBIO. The artist is self-publishing. The websites listed are social media sites, upload sites, press releases, YouTube videos, discography websites, or the artist's own website. I have not found any third-party sources supporting this artist's notability. Again, well-written article - just not notable. Singularity42 ( talk) 13:17, 26 May 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. -- Cirt ( talk) 04:36, 3 June 2011 (UTC) reply
No evidence of notability. The external links in the article are to unreliable sources, pages which only barely mention him, an advertising site, etc. Likewise Google searches have produced a resume, various unreliable sources, etc, but nothing substantial. JamesBWatson ( talk) 12:27, 26 May 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. -- Cirt ( talk) 04:35, 3 June 2011 (UTC) reply
Police officer who did his job, as some two hundred million(random number) police officers do in the world. Not notable, fails to fulfill WP notability criterion. Rather an appraisal someone wrote for a family member or a friend. -- Martin H. ( talk) 12:17, 26 May 2011 (UTC) reply
It is also not reasonable to expect the layman reader to read the history of an article of Wikipedia and check the revision history of an article, but we expect from an administrator or editor of Wikipedia who place a tag of deletion to check the revision history of an article. The original introductory para of the article reads as follows: “Safdar Huassain, a retired Senior Superintendent of Police, and formerly an Inspector of Police of Punjab Police (Pakistan) is famous for his bravery, gallantry, high degree of honesty. He served British Indian Police Service and Punjab Police, Pakistan with iron hands. In the present context of terrorism in Pakistan, old folks still talk about his bravery. The criminals were so terrified by his personality, that he was said to never wear the arms.” This introductory Para briefly describes the topic. But an editor like you has changed and now it reads as follows: “Safdar Huassain was a Senior Superintendent of Police and Inspector of Police of Pakistan's Punjab police” and after reading this first line you have place the tag of deletion.
My original words, “In the present context of terrorism in Pakistan,” were deleted. Just type on the google “terrorism in Pakistan”, and you will find the most dangerous country of the earth. The police of this country is not like the police of your country. The criminals of this country are not like the criminals of your country. Now the army cannot control the persons, which it is the duty of Police to control, because we have no Police officers like Safdar Hussain. Just read the latest news 1 2
When I wrote the original article, there were also the following lines, deleted by your friend;
"He administered his area effectively and provided service & protection to the people of the area, who still remember his legacy, and in this context, the old folks talk about his positive role in the history of the Punjab Police (Pakistan). He was an exemplary police officer, who maintained a very high degree of honesty, integrity and professionalism. He was said by the people of Punjab (Pakistan) to put the gold necklace on the neck of a goat and let her go in his area, and no one dared to touch the goat. Due to political pressure by politicians allied the criminals of that time, the government was forced to transfer him, and actually transferred him but ultimately, Nawab of Kalabagh, Malik Amir Mohammad Khan, Governor of West Pakistan, who also belonged to same Awan (Pakistan) tribe of Safdar Huassain, cancelled this transfer. This time Safdar Hussain dealt with iron hands with the criminals." These all lines were deleted.
He has a fame that is still remembered by the people, still quoted by the judges in the court of Punjab, still discussed in the Police training centers. It is a general principle of Wikipedia that editors write in good faith. If i write an article on a village or town of my country or people, I write in good faith. English language is not my mother tongue, but I am making effort to contribute to Wikipedia. It is not reasonable for other editors that first to delete lines and change the article and then place tag of deletion, instead they should improve it. With respect, I have to disagree with you. Averroist ( talk) 07:07, 27 May 2011 (UTC) reply
I have significantly improved the article with 29 references and reliable sources to show that the person is a notable man in his area. Previously I did not mention his ancestry or praise his family background in order to prove his notability, but I tried to describe his personal contributions. But the above mentioned objections raised by the editors force me to do this. Even if we ignore his professional contribution, he is a notable man.
The electronic media of the modern world and specially his country is very different from his time. Most of the job he did under Martial law government, and he displeased the government. The press was not independent in his country and the electronic media started in his country in 2002. He got retirement in 1986.
During the course of my legal practice, I heard the fame of this officer. To find the references authorities and reliable sources is my job. I have created the article Scepticism in law with 26 references. I wrote the other article Punjab Muslim League with 47 references. Now I have added a document dated 1905 issued by a representative of the British Raj to the father of this person. This document clearly demonstrates the influence wielded by his father and grandfather among the tribe, and the tribe in the Punjab, during the era of the British Raj. Previously , due to this certificate ,the active editors of the article Awan( Pakistan) have added the image of this certificate and the name of Safdar Hussain in the article, which is also a prove of the notability of this person. Daily many people try to add the names in the article of this tribe, but it is reverted by the active editors, see the revision history of the article Averroist ( talk) 22:44, 28 May 2011 (UTC) reply
“The phrase bla bla bla is generally used in response to someone that has said one of the following things: something that is not interesting to you, something very close to the truth but you have no intention of admitting to, or just random comments of bullshit and sarcasim (most popular.) This phrase is commonly used in text messages and very popular in the town of Weert, Holland.”
There are many other articles on wikipedia relating to Pakistani Police officers. These articles also needs additional citations for verification, and the tone or style may not reflect the formal tone used on Wikipedia,but why only my article is victim of discrimination? which was far better than these articles.
Averroist ( talk) 07:11, 29 May 2011 (UTC) reply
With regard to the comment by Crusoe8181 that "Inspector rank, so would appear not to be notable-" the higher rank of police officer is not a criteria of notability. The criteria is his fame. During the period of British Raj prior to and following creation of Pakistan, this officer was more famous as inspector till 1960 because government was very strong, and the post is of field officer. Many dacoits were gunned down by his revolver at that time. With these Police encounters he acquired great fame. Later on, when he was promoted, and did his job as Superintendent of Police in period of great political instability, and frequently changing political government, he was less powerful than as Inspector.
The deletion discussion must be decided by those person who are authority on history, culture, and government of Pakistan and British Raj. When in the above para I added an internal link for Police encounters, I found the article Encounter killings by police. The starting words of this article is "Encounter killings is a euphemism used in India, Pakistan, Bangladesh and Sri Lanka to describe extrajudicial killings in which police stage "gun battles" and shoot down suspected gangsters and terrorists." Now this job is mostly done by the rank of Police Inspector. Note that only 3 countries of the whole world has been listed in this definition. Many films have been made on this subject in these countries, and the film industry make great money by making these films.
"Crusoe8181" has in his mind the inspector rank of his own country. He does not know that what is Inspector Police of British Raj and the period following creation of Pakistan. Averroist ( talk) 07:48, 29 May 2011 (UTC) reply
With regard to the comments of Crusoe8181 that "the article is hagiography ", I also wrote in the original article that "he was famous for his hot temperament and he used to beat hard criminals several time." and "and due to political opposition against this hot-tempered examplry police officer,". This is not a praise. This is a criticism. As a lawyer of criminal justice system, I strongly believe in the rule of law, and that a Police officer should not take law in his hand, but I wrote what is reality. Averroist ( talk) 10:32, 29 May 2011 (UTC) reply
With regard to the comments of Martin H. that "Rather an appraisal someone wrote for a family member or a friend.”, the administrator of Wikimedia has insulted my contributions and services for Wikipedia and my writings. Why you wrote “someone wrote”. Do you know that you can check the name of user which created the article by seeing the revision history of the article. Do you know that you can make judgment about a user after seeing his user page and contributions. Do you know that this “someone”, has created 13 articles and improved how many artcles. They all are not my family members and friends. They are heroes, writers, philosophers of my nation. Please check that how many universities there are in our country, It was not any representative of university that wrote the articles but I wrote the articles. Please learn to make correct user page and please correct the html code of your user page before putting tag of deletion in any article. Averroist ( talk) 12:23, 29 May 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) v/r - T P 19:04, 2 June 2011 (UTC) reply
The subject appears to be fairly unremarkable, with the two claims to notability being that he is running for major of Chicago, and that he was given a local award. He does have coverage in the local press, but that is normal for candidates for significant local appointments, and WP:Politician does indicate that running for major by itself it not notable. There are no sources beyond the local press, and I wonder why people outside of Chicago would be interested. SilkTork * Tea time 12:09, 26 May 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. slakr\ talk / 01:05, 3 June 2011 (UTC) reply
Article about software with no claim to notability; produced by the same company that created News Publisher (see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/News Publisher), and the article is written by the same set of people. It has existed for a couple of years, was speedy tagged soon after creation but the tag was removed with promises of sources. These sources have not appeared, and I'm unable to find anything that remotely meets WP:RS. bonadea contributions talk 11:23, 26 May 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. slakr\ talk / 01:06, 3 June 2011 (UTC) reply
Contested PROD. Article about electronic publishing software without claim to notability; there are no reliable sources but several self-published ones - looks a little like an effort to market the product, to me. bonadea contributions talk 11:18, 26 May 2011 (UTC) reply
See also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Universal Converter, software produced by the same company, article written by the same people. -- bonadea contributions talk 11:25, 26 May 2011 (UTC) reply
And there is a review by the site's editor on the page: http://www.lifetimeupgrades.com/windows/network-internet/browser-tools/news-publisher/ Ankit ( talk) 13:38, 26 May 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. -- Cirt ( talk) 04:35, 3 June 2011 (UTC) reply
Delete. Actually, a simple redirect appears appropriate for this article. The subject is the mother of First Lady, Bess Truman. Nothing in this article presents significance, importance, or notability outside of the notability of her daughter. Even the article states that the subject lived an uneventful life. Sources include a book about First Ladies and Find-A-Grave, which is unreliable. Cind. amuse 10:20, 26 May 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was speedily deleted. The article was written in completely promotional terms.— Preceding unsigned comment added by JamesBWatson ( talk • contribs)
The article gives no claim of notability, and is written like a promotion. I tried tagging it for speedy deletion, but users keep removing the tags. This article has been removed several times (see here: User talk:Spiralation already for violations of Db-promo. Inks.LWC ( talk) 10:03, 26 May 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was speedily deleted by Anthony Bradbury under G6. NAC— S Marshall T/ C 11:34, 26 May 2011 (UTC) reply
Disambiguation page with only red links. Both of its articles were recently deleted. Crisco 1492 ( talk) 09:09, 26 May 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. -- Cirt ( talk) 04:34, 3 June 2011 (UTC) reply
Delete. Notability is not established in accordance with WP:ENT or WP:GNG. Lack of significant, reliable, and independent sources. Subject lacks significant roles in television and films. Cind. amuse 08:46, 26 May 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman ( talk) 00:51, 3 June 2011 (UTC) reply
this was previously deleted and suspiciously a single purpose editor has recreated. it looks blatantly like WP:AUTOBIO. nothing notable about her career, the references only refer to her as an author but are not sources that address her indepth. gets a mere 7 gscholar hits [53]. even many PhD students get more than ths. LibStar ( talk) 08:39, 26 May 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. -- Cirt ( talk) 04:34, 3 June 2011 (UTC) reply
fails WP:ORG and WP:GNG. nothing in gnews and nothing on a major Australian news website [54]. the history section looks like complete original research. this is not a mainstream competition. LibStar ( talk) 07:55, 26 May 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. slakr\ talk / 01:10, 3 June 2011 (UTC) reply
The subject is not notable per WP:GNG and WP:AUTHOR, and he has only won one award which I did not find anything about via Google. Inks.LWC ( talk) 07:36, 26 May 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman ( talk) 00:49, 2 June 2011 (UTC) reply
Notable only for one event. Ridernyc ( talk) 06:57, 26 May 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was Keep. Lankiveil ( speak to me) 03:38, 28 May 2011 (UTC) reply
as per WP:EVENT and WP:EFFECT. unfortunately people disappear all the time, they get some coverage but a mere 7 gnews hits [55] says it all. and yes gnews has australian papers back for at least 50 years. LibStar ( talk) 08:18, 9 May 2011 (UTC) reply
* 1.
News Sarah's flame still burns strong on the eve of a heartbreaking 20-year anniversaryFull Text Available By: DENISE GADD. Age, The (Melbourne), 10/07/2010 Database: Australia/New Zealand Reference Centre Add to folder Remove from folderRelevancy: Relevancy Rank is 100 HTML Full Text * 2.
News PLEA ON MISSING SARAHFull Text Available Sunday Herald Sun (Melbourne), 11.07.2010, p20-20, 1 Database: Australia/New Zealand Reference Centre Add to folder Remove from folderRelevancy: Relevancy Rank is 95 HTML Full Text * 3.
News Did killer take our Sarah too? By: David Murray. Sunday Mail, The (Brisbane), 04/09/2005 Database: Australia/New Zealand Reference Centre Add to folder Remove from folderRelevancy: Relevancy Rank is 95 HTML Full Text * 4.
News Website to help grievingFull Text Available By: People | Donna Carton. Frankston Standard-Hastings Leader, 26.07.2010, p5-5, 1 Database: Australia/New Zealand Reference Centre Add to folder Remove from folderRelevancy: Relevancy Rank is 93 HTML Full Text * 5.
News Website to help grievingFull Text Available By: People | Donna Carton. Frankston Standard-Hastings Leader, 26.07.2010, p5-5, 1 Database: Australia/New Zealand Reference Centre Add to folder Remove from folderRelevancy: Relevancy Rank is 93 HTML Full Text * 6.
News Did Paul Denyer kill Sarah, too?; Secret fears of killer's family By: KELVIN HEALEY. Sunday Herald Sun (Melbourne), 15/05/2005 Database: Australia/New Zealand Reference Centre Add to folder Remove from folderRelevancy: Relevancy Rank is 93 HTML Full Text * 7.
Transcript Million dollars on offer in missing persons case ABC Premium News, 10/07/2010 Database: Australia/New Zealand Reference Centre Add to folder Remove from folderRelevancy: Relevancy Rank is 92 HTML Full Text * 8.
News Yard hunt for clues on Sarah By: CARLY CRAWFORD. Sunday Herald Sun (Melbourne), 26/09/2004 Database: Australia/New Zealand Reference Centre Add to folder Remove from folderRelevancy: Relevancy Rank is 91 HTML Full Text * 9.
News $1m reward in bid to let Sarah rest By: Padraic Murphy. Australian, The, 06/02/2004 Database: Australia/New Zealand Reference Centre Add to folder Remove from folderRelevancy: Relevancy Rank is 90 HTML Full Text * 10.
News Brother's plea to find body By: Mark Buttler chief police reporter. Herald Sun (Melbourne), 15/11/2006 Database: Australia/New Zealand Reference Centre Add to folder Remove from folderRelevancy: Relevancy Rank is 90 HTML Full Text * 11.
News Vic: $1 million on offer for info on MacDiarmid disappearance By: N.A.. AAP Australian National News Wire, 05/02/2004 Database: Australia/New Zealand Reference Centre Add to folder Remove from folderRelevancy: Relevancy Rank is 87 HTML Full Text * 12.
News The dark side of life exposed For 37years Charlie Bezzina worked tirelessly to solve some of the state's most shocking crimes. His new book reveals the heartbreak and hardshipsFull Text Available By: Keith Moor. Herald Sun (Melbourne), 17.09.2010, p38-38, 1 Database: Australia/New Zealand Reference Centre Add to folder Remove from folderRelevancy: Relevancy Rank is 85 HTML Full Text * 13.
News $1m reward to end pain of 14 years By: Mark Alexander. Sunday Mail, The (Brisbane), 15/02/2004 Database: Australia/New Zealand Reference Centre Add to folder Remove from folderRelevancy: Relevancy Rank is 84 HTML Full Text * 14.
News Flowers mystery; Parents' plea over death By: CARLY CRAWFORD. Sunday Herald Sun (Melbourne), 10/07/2005 Database: Australia/New Zealand Reference Centre Add to folder Remove from folderRelevancy: Relevancy Rank is 84 HTML Full Text * 15.
News $1mil. to end a family's torment By: Holly Lloyd-McDonald. Herald Sun (Melbourne), 06/02/2004 Database: Australia/New Zealand Reference Centre Add to folder Remove from folderRelevancy: Relevancy Rank is 83 HTML Full Text * 16.
News Vic: $1 million on offer for info on MacDiarmid dissappearance By: N.A.. AAP Australian National News Wire, 05/02/2004 Database: Australia/New Zealand Reference Centre Add to folder Remove from folderRelevancy: Relevancy Rank is 83 HTML Full Text * 17.
News Stop our suffering By: HOLLY LLOYD-McDONALD. Herald Sun (Melbourne), 10/07/2003 Database: Australia/New Zealand Reference Centre Add to folder Remove from folderRelevancy: Relevancy Rank is 83 HTML Full Text * 18.
News $1m for leads on missing womanFull Text Available By: Andrea Petrie. Age, The (Melbourne), 06/02/2004 Database: Australia/New Zealand Reference Centre Add to folder Remove from folderRelevancy: Relevancy Rank is 80 HTML Full Text * 19.
News 15 years and still waiting, hoping Herald Sun (Melbourne), 07/07/2005 Database: Australia/New Zealand Reference Centre Add to folder Remove from folderRelevancy: Relevancy Rank is 79 HTML Full Text * 20.
News TV previewsFull Text Available By: JUDY ADAMSON. Sydney Morning Herald, The, 20/09/2004 Database: Australia/New Zealand Reference Centre Add to folder Remove from folderRelevancy: Relevancy Rank is 79 HTML Full Text * 21.
News No leads from psychicsFull Text Available By: highlights WITH GLEN HUMPHRIES. Newcastle Herald, The (includes the Central Coast Herald), 30/03/2005 Database: Australia/New Zealand Reference Centre Add to folder Remove from folderRelevancy: Relevancy Rank is 79 HTML Full Text * 22.
News $1m reward in bid to solve 1990 murder By: Padraic Murphy. Australian, The, 06/02/2004 Database: Australia/New Zealand Reference Centre Add to folder Remove from folderRelevancy: Relevancy Rank is 79 HTML Full Text * 23.
News In good taste? By: Victoria Segal, Helen Stewart and Sarah Dempster. Sunday Times, The, 08/05/2005 Database: Australia/New Zealand Reference Centre Add to folder Remove from folderRelevancy: Relevancy Rank is 77 HTML Full Text * 24.
News Supernatural sleuthsFull Text Available By: SCOTT ELLIS. Sun-Herald, The (Sydney), 26/09/2004 Database: Australia/New Zealand Reference Centre Add to folder Remove from folderRelevancy: Relevancy Rank is 74 HTML Full Text * 25.
News Sense of satisfaction By: Eleanor Sprawson. Daily Telegraph, The (Sydney), 22/09/2004 Database: Australia/New Zealand Reference Centre Add to folder Remove from folderRelevancy: Relevancy Rank is 72 HTML Full Text * 26.
News CRITIC'S CHOICE - SundayFull Text Available By: LARISSA DUBECKI. Age, The (Melbourne), 23/09/2004 Database: Australia/New Zealand Reference Centre Add to folder Remove from folderRelevancy: Relevancy Rank is 71 HTML Full Text * 27.
News TV EYE ; Robert Fidgeon takes a critical look at what's on our screens this week By: Robert Fidgeon. Herald Sun (Melbourne), 22/09/2004 Database: Australia/New Zealand Reference Centre Add to folder Remove from folderRelevancy: Relevancy Rank is 71 HTML Full Text * 28.
Periodical I SEE dead people.Full Text Available By: Brown, Jenny. Woman's Day (Australian Consolidated Press), 27/09/2004, Vol. 56 Issue 39, p103-103, 1p, 2 Color Photographs Subjects: AUSTRALIA; GIBNEY, Rebecca; SENSING Murder (TV program); TELEVISION programs; SUPERNATURAL beings; PSYCHICS; BYRNE, Rhonda Database: Australia/New Zealand Reference Centre Add to folder Remove from folderRelevancy: Relevancy Rank is 71 HTML Full Text * 29.
News No visits to Denyer; Killer brother refuses meeting By: KELVIN HEALEY. Sunday Herald Sun (Melbourne), 04/09/2005 Database: Australia/New Zealand Reference Centre Add to folder Remove from folderRelevancy: Relevancy Rank is 69 HTML Full Text * 30.
News CRITIC'S CHOICEFull Text Available By: BRIAN COURTIS. Sun-Herald, The (Sydney), 26/09/2004 Database: Australia/New Zealand Reference Centre Add to folder Remove from folderRelevancy: Relevancy Rank is 68 HTML Full Text * 31.
News CRITIC'S CHOICEFull Text Available By: BRIAN COURTIS. Sunday Age, The (Melbourne), 26/09/2004 Database: Australia/New Zealand Reference Centre Add to folder Remove from folderRelevancy: Relevancy Rank is 68 HTML Full Text * 32.
News Psychic sleuths By: Simon Yeaman. Advertiser, The (Adelaide), 22/09/2004 Database: Australia/New Zealand Reference Centre Add to folder Remove from folderRelevancy: Relevancy Rank is 68 HTML Full Text * 33.
News prime time By: Words: Phillip Koch. Sunday Telegraph, The (Sydney), 26/09/2004 Database: Australia/New Zealand Reference Centre Add to folder Remove from folderRelevancy: Relevancy Rank is 68 HTML Full Text * 34.
News Turning to crime was not so tough for smitten new mum Rebecca Gibney. By: Words: Phillip Koch. Sunday Mail (Adelaide), 26/09/2004 Database: Australia/New Zealand Reference Centre Add to folder Remove from folderRelevancy: Relevancy Rank is 68 HTML Full Text * 35.
News Disappearance haunts TV psychic Herald Sun (Melbourne), 06/04/2005 Database: Australia/New Zealand Reference Centre Add to folder Remove from folderRelevancy: Relevancy Rank is 68 HTML Full Text * 36.
News Daredevils fit as a fleeFull Text Available By: Glen Humphries. Newcastle Herald, The (includes the Central Coast Herald), 25/09/2004 Database: Australia/New Zealand Reference Centre Add to folder Remove from folderRelevancy: Relevancy Rank is 68 HTML Full Text * 37.
News In from the cold to defy a killer By: KELVIN HEALEY. Sunday Herald Sun (Melbourne), 28/08/2005 Database: Australia/New Zealand Reference Centre Add to folder Remove from folderRelevancy: Relevancy Rank is 62 HTML Full Text * 38.
Periodical SOLVING THE Beaumont mystery.Full Text Available By: Brown, Jenny. Woman's Day (Australian Consolidated Press), 31/01/2005, Vol. 57 Issue 5, p28-29, 2p, 4 Black and White Photographs Subjects: HILL, Scott Russell; PSYCHICS; BEAUMONT, Jane; BEAUMONT, Arnna; BEAUMONT, Grant; MISSING children; BEAUMONT, Nancy; BEAUMONT, Jim Database: Australia/New Zealand Reference Centre Add to folder Remove from folderRelevancy: Relevancy Rank is 62 HTML Full Text * 39.
News Psychic clues By: Erica Thompson. Courier Mail, The (Brisbane), 23/09/2004 Database: Australia/New Zealand Reference Centre Add to folder Remove from folderRelevancy: Relevancy Rank is 61 HTML Full Text * 40.
News A case for psychics By: TONY JOHNSTON. Sunday Herald Sun (Melbourne), 26/09/2004 Database: Australia/New Zealand Reference Centre Add to folder Remove from folderRelevancy: Relevancy Rank is 59 HTML Full Text * 41.
News NETWORKINGFull Text Available By: KYLIE MILLER. Age, The (Melbourne), 23/09/2004 Database: Australia/New Zealand Reference Centre Add to folder Remove from folderRelevancy: Relevancy Rank is 57 HTML Full Text * 42.
News Hands-on psychics By: Kerrie Murphy. Australian, The, 25/09/2004 Database: Australia/New Zealand Reference Centre Add to folder Remove from folderRelevancy: Relevancy Rank is 57 HTML Full Text * 43.
News Bones discovered in backyardFull Text Available Frankston Standard-Hastings Leader, 09.08.2010, p2-2, 1 Database: Australia/New Zealand Reference Centre Add to folder Remove from folderRelevancy: Relevancy Rank is 54 HTML Full Text * 44.
Periodical 'I KNOW WHERE THE BEAUMONTS ARE!'.Full Text Available By: Brown, Jenny. Woman's Day (Australian Consolidated Press), 06/02/2006, Vol. 58 Issue 6, p32-33, 2p, 2 Color Photographs, 2 Black and White Photographs Subjects: ADELAIDE (S. Aust.); AUSTRALIA; HILL, Scott Russell; CHILDREN -- Death; AUSTRALIA Day Database: Australia/New Zealand Reference Centre Add to folder Remove from folderRelevancy: Relevancy Rank is 52 HTML Full Text * 45.
News There to help outFull Text Available By: Volunteers | Jeff Jones. Oakleigh Monash-Springvale Dandenong Leader, 30.09.2009, p5-5, 1 Database: Australia/New Zealand Reference Centre Add to folder Remove from folderRelevancy: Relevancy Rank is 51 HTML Full Text * 46.
News Witnesses 'too scared' to plunge into police rewards poolFull Text Available By: MARK RUSSELL. Sunday Age, The (Melbourne), 22/03/2009 Database: Australia/New Zealand Reference Centre Add to folder Remove from folderRelevancy: Relevancy Rank is 50 HTML Full Text * 47.
News Police rewards going unpaidFull Text Available By: MEX COOPER. Age, The (Melbourne), 19/01/2009 Database: Australia/New Zealand Reference Centre Add to folder Remove from folderRelevancy: Relevancy Rank is 50 HTML Full Text * 48.
News Rewards face scrap as $10m unclaimed By: Mark Dunn. Herald Sun (Melbourne), 06/02/2006 Database: Australia/New Zealand Reference Centre Add to folder Remove from folderRelevancy: Relevancy Rank is 46 HTML Full Text * 49.
News A state of mind; Rebecca Gibney is loving her new life, writes Darren Devlyn By: Darren Devlyn. Herald Sun (Melbourne), 22/09/2004 Database: Australia/New Zealand Reference Centre Add to folder Remove from folderRelevancy: Relevancy Rank is 45 HTML Full Text * 50.
News don't miss By: Robert Fidgeon. Herald Sun (Melbourne), 25/09/2004 Database: Australia/New Zealand Reference Centre Add to folder Remove from folderRelevancy: Relevancy Rank is 45 HTML Full Text
# $1m for murder reward; Parents of slain woman win inquest By: Geoff Wilkinson. Herald Sun (Melbourne), 17/12/2004 Database: Australia/New Zealand Reference Centre Add to folder Remove from folderRelevancy: Relevancy Rank is 45 HTML Full Text # 52.
News $1m reward for graveside killer By: Gosia Kaszubska. Australian, The, 02/02/2005 Database: Australia/New Zealand Reference Centre Add to folder Remove from folderRelevancy: Relevancy Rank is 45 HTML Full Text # 53.
News $1m reward for graveside killer By: Gosia Kaszubska. Australian, The, 02/02/2005 Database: Australia/New Zealand Reference Centre Add to folder Remove from folderRelevancy: Relevancy Rank is 45 HTML Full Text # 54.
News Witness to death revealed; Police re-open strangling case By: CARLY CRAWFORD. Sunday Herald Sun (Melbourne), 06/06/2004 Database: Australia/New Zealand Reference Centre Add to folder Remove from folderRelevancy: Relevancy Rank is 45 HTML Full Text # 55.
News Psychic phenomena By: TONY JOHNSTON. Sunday Herald Sun (Melbourne), 14/11/2004 Database: Australia/New Zealand Reference Centre Add to folder Remove from folderRelevancy: Relevancy Rank is 45 HTML Full Text
News Swimming out of fearFull Text Available By: with GLEN HUMPHRIES. Illawarra Mercury, 25/09/2004 Database: Australia/New Zealand Reference Centre Add to folder Remove from folderRelevancy: Relevancy Rank is 45 HTML Full Text
-- Melburnian ( talk) 05:58, 27 May 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was merge to Wycombe Wanderers F.C. Spartaz Humbug! 06:23, 3 June 2011 (UTC) reply
Non-notable mascot ChrisTheDude ( talk) 08:13, 18 May 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. slakr\ talk / 01:12, 3 June 2011 (UTC) reply
clearly fails Wikipedia:ATHLETE#Rugby_league. he has only played lower level Toyota Cup for Newcastle Knights not top grade NRL. LibStar ( talk) 06:08, 26 May 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. -- Cirt ( talk) 04:34, 3 June 2011 (UTC) reply
The arguments presented at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of off-field incidents involving rugby league players apply to this article also. This list is mostly concerning off-field incidents, and is almost entirely negative. As such, it is unencyclopedic and unnecessary. Of course, some incidents (like the St Kilda schoolgirl scandal) may be notable - these can have their own articles. St Anselm ( talk) 06:04, 26 May 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. -- Cirt ( talk) 04:34, 3 June 2011 (UTC) reply
Like the corresponding list of rugby league incidents which has just been deleted, this list is almost entirely negative, and as such, unencyclopedic. There are a few notable incidents, of course - these have their own articles and are listed at List of sporting scandals#Rugby union scandals. So this list is unnecessary. St Anselm ( talk) 05:58, 26 May 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was SPEEDY DELETE, copyvio. rʨanaɢ ( talk) 05:45, 26 May 2011 (UTC) reply
To put it simply, nothing in the article is actually about the topic of "psychological warfare in the People's Republic of China", except for a single sentence at the end of the lede saying that the PRC military is interested in it. The rest of the article is either about psychological warfare in general with no specific information about the PRC, or its use in ancient China. rʨanaɢ ( talk) 05:31, 26 May 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. -- Cirt ( talk) 04:34, 3 June 2011 (UTC) reply
fails WP:BIO and WP:CREATIVE as a journalist. surprisingly for an active TV news journalist nothing in gnews. the fellowship she won is a minor one. LibStar ( talk) 04:47, 26 May 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Unsourced BLP. Ron Ritzman ( talk) 00:54, 2 June 2011 (UTC) reply
I contested the prod here myself because I think AfD would work better in this case. I was even going to speedy this but a Gsearch reveals that she actually is a real person. Still, she doesn't pass WP:NSPORT because all I could really find was a Facebook page. Erpert Who is this guy? | Wanna talk about it? 04:04, 26 May 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy delete ( G11) by Athaenara. Non-admin closure -- Pgallert ( talk) 09:24, 26 May 2011 (UTC) reply
Notability concern MorganKevinJ (talk) 03:54, 26 May 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was Nomination withdrawn. LibStar ( talk) 09:18, 28 May 2011 (UTC) reply
fails WP:BAND. this Australian band existed from 83 to 91. not all coverage may be found online but there is nothing in gnews. google search [60] reveals directory listings rather than indepth article. the last paragraph of this article goes into the career of an individual band member after the band ceased working. LibStar ( talk) 03:23, 26 May 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. slakr\ talk / 01:16, 3 June 2011 (UTC) reply
The article does not reflect any notability. Nor can I find any RS support for such. Epeefleche ( talk) 02:00, 26 May 2011 (UTC) reply
This article should not be deleted because as you can see I have stated a source for where I found my information. Furthermore Bulgarian music is important and people should be able to read about the style and music of Tatiana!
The result was delete. -- Cirt ( talk) 00:20, 2 June 2011 (UTC) reply
Contested prod. Pure speculation on the author's part about the possible relocation of the Brampton Battalion of the Ontario Hockey League to nearby Burlington. No references, amounts to wishful thinking. Delete. Blanchardb - Me• MyEars• MyMouth- timed 00:53, 26 May 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. -- Cirt ( talk) 04:34, 3 June 2011 (UTC) reply
The article of the popular Asian online shopping store has not yet established the notability. Yes, I created this article. However, I cannot nominate it for speedy delete for hopes to bring this article into attention. Nevertheless, I will allow administrators to speedy delete it if possible. -- Gh87 ( talk) 05:01, 19 May 2011 (UTC) reply
I found the page to be useful in establishing the credibility of YesAsia in my online shopping experience. I just wanted to make sure my credit cards weren't going to be stolen. - Octieriffic, June 2, 2011 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.44.81.226 ( talk) 18:54, 2 June 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus. Spartaz Humbug! 06:24, 3 June 2011 (UTC) reply
If an incident is truly notable it should be included in the main theme park's article or have it's own article. As it is, the scope of this article is basically newsclippings that meet the original research criteria in the lead of the article. MBisanz talk 07:09, 19 May 2011 (UTC) reply
*Dunno Instinctively I was a delete, until I read it. I think shuffling them off to the article of each park is actually a bad idea on two counts, first they'll be deleted one by one as not notable or undue weight, or something like that, and secondly I think it dtracts from the notable concept that amusement rides are fallible. Perhaps retitling it to Funfair accidents would be a better approach.
Greglocock (
talk) 00:36, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
reply
The result was delete. -- Cirt ( talk) 06:26, 28 May 2011 (UTC) reply
Autobiography. A PROD was earlier declined, and an even earlier stub was deleted. Plenty of sources briefly mention the subject's work or collaboration on journalistic projects, but this is inevitable for reporters. I have been unable to find RS about the subject. The community should decide. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง ( talk) 07:28, 19 May 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 06:24, 3 June 2011 (UTC) reply
fails WP:ORG. created by a single purpose editor. nothing in gnews and google indicates mainly directory listings. gets 1 gbook hit for 1 line mention on 1 page. LibStar ( talk) 07:37, 19 May 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus. Spartaz Humbug! 06:26, 3 June 2011 (UTC) reply
Does not meet notability guidelines, nor can it be attributed to reliable sources (Channel 4 claims which are unsupported cannot be counted as such) and it may even be perceived as advertising - Wikipedia:Deletion policy. See discussion page - attempt to find reliable sources has failed. Bobadillaman ( talk) 11:04, 19 May 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus. Spartaz Humbug! 06:27, 3 June 2011 (UTC) reply
Promotional article for a bank. I can't see this meeting WP:CORP - most sources I found are either directory listings, a blog or two, and websites affiliated with this entity. As always, others are welcome to prove me wrong. — KuyaBriBri Talk 14:27, 19 May 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was redirect to Lupe Fiasco. this can be undone after the publication if it garners coverage Spartaz Humbug! 07:05, 3 June 2011 (UTC) reply
This article does not cite any reliable sources. This album will be released around November/December 2011, it's too early to create a page for it as there is not enough information about this album. Also, the title is just a working title, nothing about this album or its release date has been confirmed yet. MariAna_MiMi ( Talk) 16:35, 19 May 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. slakr\ talk / 01:22, 3 June 2011 (UTC) reply
Previously PRODded twice and deleted twice. Recreated a third time. Examination of the sources shows that this company does not meet WP:CORP and WP:SIGCOV criteria for inclusion. Trivial mentions, primary sources, blogs, press releases, etc., do not amount to significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources. ~ Amatulić ( talk) 17:37, 19 May 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 13:14, 27 May 2011 (UTC) reply
WP:N: Tough sourcing because of the commonality of the name, I'm unable to find reliable secondary sources that cover this British DJ/presenter to verify the existence of or evidence the notability of. This Harvey is apparently different than the more-covered New York City DJ of the same name, not to mention the Alabama football coach, etc. Additional sources welcomed, as always. joe decker talk to me 19:28, 19 May 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. -- Cirt ( talk) 06:26, 28 May 2011 (UTC) reply
I fail to see how this company meets WP:CORP. Most search hits were sites affiliated with the subject, directory listings, PR pieces, or only mentioned this company in passing. The "top 100 firm" claim, though unreferenced in the article, is what got this past A7 in my book. However, in researching this claim and other claims of high rankings the company makes ( on its website), these rankings were made by publications ( Accountancy Age and Hemscott) that I would consider to be "media of limited interest and circulation" under WP:CORPDEPTH. If I'm wrong on the last claim please let me know. — KuyaBriBri Talk 19:29, 19 May 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was redirect to Eyecare in Ghana. ( non-admin closure) Atmoz ( talk) 16:44, 27 May 2011 (UTC) reply
No reliable sources - three of the references are just defining "optician" (in a section plagiarized from the article of that name) and the fourth is a random document on Scribd. Redundant to Eyecare in Ghana, so not worth fixing up, but there's also nothing to merge because the article contains no reliably sourced information. Roscelese ( talk ⋅ contribs) 22:52, 19 May 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. -- Cirt ( talk) 06:26, 28 May 2011 (UTC) reply
This article is motivated by a topic in the philosophy literature, namely Pierce's Reduction Thesis. However, the content of the article is original research ( WP:NOR), consisting of an attempt to introduce a novel formalism. Searching for key phrases in Google Books and Scholar didn't uncover anything resembling the text here. Melchoir ( talk) 23:15, 19 May 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. -- Cirt ( talk) 06:26, 28 May 2011 (UTC) reply
No significant coverage to meet the WP:GNG and no evidence that he meets WP:SKATER in that he didn't win his national championships. Is there any evidence available that he actually did compete at international, not just national level? The-Pope ( talk) 23:42, 19 May 2011 (UTC) reply