"if you go into the profile of the person, let's say Tamal KG in Wikipedia, Wikipedia allow you to correct and write what you find most correct but then ultimately they are the ones who decide whether to accept the correction or not."
Robert baron3888 (
talk) 01:06, 22 April 2024 (UTC)reply
some sincere followers and experts who represent srila prabhupada make corrections and then the correction are reverted back to the original.
Robert baron3888 (
talk) 02:31, 22 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Robert baron3888, Wikipedia articles are meant to be written with a neutral, objective, third-party point of view. People closely connected to or having a strong feeling, negative or positve, about a subject may be unable to do so, and accordingly get reverted. Please use the talk page of the article in question to discuss edits, such as when they get reverted. If an editor represents the interests of a subject, they should
WP:DISCLOSE their conflict of interest as instructed before they engage with the topic, whether it be editing the article or discussing it on the talk page or elsewhere. Best, — Usedtobecool☎️ 03:49, 22 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Robert baron3888, are you asking why it is that (i) some sincere followers and experts who represent Srila Prabhupada make corrections and then (ii) the corrections are reverted back to the original? If so, then (i) maybe out of a desire to inform, maybe out of a desire to promote. (Either way,
Usedtobecool explains above what these people must do.) (ii) Perhaps because the "correction" was promotional, inadequately referenced, or incomprehensible; perhaps for some other reason. Please point to an example of such reversion. --
Hoary (
talk) 04:01, 22 April 2024 (UTC)reply
if you go into the profile of the person, let's say Tamal KG in Wikipedia, Wikipedia allow you to correct and write what you find most correct but then ultimately they are the ones who decide whether to accept the correction or not.
Robert baron3888 (
talk) 06:12, 22 April 2024 (UTC)reply
This needs to be corrected. So allow the correction to be made please.
Robert baron3888 (
talk) 06:14, 22 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Robert baron3888, you are free to improve
Hansadutta Swami yourself, as long as your improvement accords with Wikipedia policies. Be sure to cite
reliable sources and to provide an informative edit summary. --
Hoary (
talk) 06:24, 22 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Haggerty Award correction
I don't know who writes or edits the Haggerty Award page on Wikipedia, but our association is appreciative. An update/correction is needed on the page. The NIT no longer co-presents the Haggerty Award. The NIT affiliation with the award was discontinued after 2021. The Met Basketball Writers Association is now the sole presenter of the award.
Thank you
MBWA president
67.86.4.111 (
talk) 01:57, 22 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Hello. You can see the usernames of the various people who have edited the article
Haggerty Award by looking at its "history".
Unfortunately for you, your question has had the unforeseen consequence of me examining the article and questioning whether it should be in Wikipedia at all. As far as I can see not a single one of the references is about "The Haggerty Award" as opposed to individual winners - and without such references, it does not meet Wikipedia's criteria for
notability.
To answer your question more directly: you are welcome to make suggestions for edits to the article using the
edit request wizard. But in my opinion, anything you do other than finding a source where somebody wholly unconnected with the award has chosen to write at some depth about the award itself (not its winners) will be a waste of time. See
golden rule for the criteria that any such source must meet.
ColinFine (
talk) 11:11, 22 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Hi! I received the following message from an editor, and would really appreciate tips on neutrality and updating the attempted entry to be in the guidelines of Wikipedia. I'm a student attempting to give the subject its due writing, not promote the work being done. Thanks in advance!
Hello, I'm
REDACTED403. I wanted to let you know that one of
your recent contributions—specifically
this edit to
Orange Mound, Memphis—has been undone because it appeared to be promotional.
Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "
soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a
neutral perspective. Please take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the
Help desk. Thank you.
-REDACTED403(talk) 12:29, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[
reply]
Hi, thank you for taking a look at the page! May I ask you note specific instances, and what shifts in language, I can make to make it neutral? It is definitely not my intention too as I am student looking to expand the canon on particular types of architecture, and through this, I have nominated Orange Mound Tower.
Harmonytheestudent, some samples: Unapologetic, founded by producer IMAKEDMADBEATS, also known as James Duke, is an art collective based in Memphis, Tennessee, consisting of visual artists, musicians, clothing designers, event coordinators, and strategists that herald an artist-first platform, allowing talent a part of the collective to express authentic artistic and cultural synergy that is not typically found inside traditional labels.
I don't understand what it is that they herald (or that it heralds}. But it's only tenuously about a neighborhood, so it doesn't belong here.
Unapologetic is comprised of four teams: Unapologetic. Sound, Unapologetic. Visual, Unapologetic. Garments, and The Unapologetic World App.
More about something that isn't a neighborhood.
TONE and Unapologetic have voiced their intention to transform the former industrial space into a mixed-use hub for community arts, business, and innovation, among other ideas. In a July 2021 interview with the Commercial Appeal, Victoria Jones, co-founder, stated, “We want to build out something that could serve all needs, or as many needs as possible in one space.” She went on to add, “We will have retail and service providers, nonprofits, art organizations, a wellness center. We want to be the thing that can truly empower and fill the potholes that exist in Black communities.”
Bluntly, we're minimally interested in intentions, except perhaps when these intentions have been described by people independent of those who harbor them. (And interviews don't count.)
Incidentally, while I'm sure that Jones wanted to say that the thing should truly both {empower and {fill the potholes that exist in}} Black communities, she ends up seeming to aspire to empowering potholes. So if what she says is worth expressing here (which I doubt), I suggest that you summarize it in your own, less awkward words.
Et cetera. All the best with the revision! --
Hoary (
talk) 04:50, 22 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Trying to update my company's logo to the correct logo, getting an error message saying that I do not own the logo
I am trying to change my company (
Metropolitan Oval)'s logo on the page from the incorrect red, low-res logo to a high-res correct logo that can be found at the top of the page here -->
[1]. I keep getting an error message when editing the logo saying that Wikipedia can't verify that I own the logo. While I personally do not own the logo, I am in possession of a high-res correct version and feel that it is important to update it. Is there any work-around to this issue?
Anthony42710 (
talk) 04:45, 22 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Hi
Anthony42710. If the logo is essentially as the one currently being used with only minor changes (e.g changing the color from red to black), you can try just updating the current file clicking on "Update a new version of this file" at
File:Met Oval Logo.png; however, the current file is uploaded as
non-free content, which means it's use needs to comply with
Wikipedia's non-free content use policy. There are
ten non-free content use criteria and one of these criteria is
criterion #3 which deals with things like file size and resolution. Wikipedia, in priciple, only allows low-resolution versions of non-free content to be uploaded as explained
here. If you upload a new version of the logo that is too be or too high in resolution, someone (a
WP:BOT or human editor) will re-size it and reduce it's resolution so that it complies with relevant policy. If the logo you want to upload is quite different than the one currently being used, you should probably upload it as a new file and you can request that someone do this for you at
WP:FFU.Now, having posted that, it's quite possible that current logo is actually
too simple to be eligible for copyright protection under US copyright law; so, if the new version you want to upload is also essentially the same, then it too would most likely be too simple for copyright protection. In such a case, the new version should be uploaded to
Wikimedia Commons instead of Wikipedia because Commons is better suited to host such content. You might want first ask about this
c:Commons:Village pump/Copyright just to see what some others think. If the prevailing opinion is that the new version is too simple, you can upload it using
c:Commons:Upload under a copyright license of
c:Template:PD-logo.Finally, since you've stated you're an employee of Metropolitan Oval, you should carefully read through
Wikipedia:Conflict of interest and
Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure before trying to make any edits to any content about the company on Wikipedia. Your connection to the company doesn't matter so much to Commons, but it does matter quite a bit to Wikipedia and there are some limitations as to what you can do. The more you understand about these limitations, the less likely you're going g\find yourself running into problems. --
Marchjuly (
talk) 07:00, 22 April 2024 (UTC)reply
May you please help me propose a merge?
I'm not sure where to start proposing a merge and starting a discussion. I would like to propose the article
emailSanta.com be merged into
Santa Claus under the section "Letter writing". Could someone please help me set up the discussion, including adding the appropriate templates? Thanks!
Félix An (
talk) 07:04, 22 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Félix An the instructions for merging are at
WP:MERGE. Why do you want to merge the articles? If emailSanta.com is notable, the article is long enough to stand alone and if it is not notable, you could nominate it at
WP:Articles for deletion.
TSventon (
talk) 11:27, 22 April 2024 (UTC)reply
See
WP:MERGE. However, I don't recommend it for this particular case. The website is independently notable and worthy of a standalone article. Sources include a New York Times article.
Clarityfiend (
talk) 11:25, 22 April 2024 (UTC)reply
about posting an article
Hello. Can I create a Wikipedia article in different styles?
Do I have to create an article again to add English and Russian to the article I created in Azerbaijani, or can I add different languages to the article I created in Azerbaijani?
Hasanagha Asadov (
talk) 10:39, 22 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Hello. Every different language version of Wikipedia is an independent project, with its own rules and procedures. Articles on the same subject in different languages can be straight translations - but only if they meet the policies of both language versions. Sometimes they start as straight translations, but get edited independently; sometimes they are created completely indpendently of one another.
If you have written an article in az-wiki, you are welcome to translate it into English for en-wiki. But en-wiki's policies are stricter than many others, and you may find that the subject is acceptable in az-wiki, but does not meet en-wiki's criteria for
notability: it depends on the quality of the sources.
As for translating to ru-wiki: You'd need to ask there.
ColinFine (
talk) 11:18, 22 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Thank you for your prompt responce. Can I create multiple drafts on my profile?
Hasanagha Asadov (
talk) 11:44, 22 April 2024 (UTC)reply
You can create multiple drafts, as sub-pages of your user page. (Wikipedia doesn't have "profiles". )
Maproom (
talk) 13:26, 22 April 2024 (UTC)reply
@
Hasanagha Asadov: (
edit conflict) You can create multiple drafts in your user space. Just enter "User:Hasanagha Asadov/name of topic" in the search box, and click the "Start the page ..." prompt to create each draft.
Deor (
talk) 13:30, 22 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Yes, but I suggest you don't create drafts in multiple languages in the same Wikipedia: as far as I know, there are no tools to move a page from one Wikipedia to another, so it would be much better to create each your user pages of that language Wikipedia. In English Wikipedia, you can have as many
user subpages (or personal sandboxes) as you want. I'm guessing that you can do that in any other Wikipedia as well.
ColinFine (
talk) 16:07, 22 April 2024 (UTC)reply
twinkle unblock screwup
I used Twinkle to unblock
here, and it's showing up in the block log but not on the page? What did I forget to do?
Valereee (
talk) 13:47, 22 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Use of Wikipedia photos
I would like to use Wikipedia photos for a book I have written. I do not plan to use more than 10 or 12 photos. Can this be done? Is there a charge? Do I need written permission?
2601:586:CD00:7F90:856A:E8B5:6A2F:10DE (
talk) 14:27, 22 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Most photos on Wikipedia are under a license that allows for reuse for any purpose if attribution is given. You can click on the photo to see the exact license terms. Some photos are used under non-free use, which means there is no right to reuse the photos. For photos in that case, you would need to contact the copyright holder directly for permission.
RudolfRed (
talk) 14:55, 22 April 2024 (UTC)reply
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.
Hello there! I need your help. A guy named Sportsfan 1234 continues to investigate sockpuppets of the other account named Raymarcbadz and insist the admins to block all the socks. The editing of Olympic-related articles has been a major issue since June. He favored the users to ban me from editing. Yet, he continues to baffle the socks and the sockmaster without any further reason. He never replies nor entertains my questions and comments. He destroyed the reputation of the user who spent 16 years of editing Wikipedia articles. We need your help to stop this nonsensical issue. Thank you!
DayangHirang4405 (
talk) 14:49, 22 April 2024 (UTC)reply
@
DayangHirang4405, the place to bring complaints about editor behavior is
WP:ANI. Be sure to read and follow the directions at the top.
57.140.16.48 (
talk) 16:24, 22 April 2024 (UTC)reply
When citing a source in a foreign language, do I have to translate the quote being cited, or leave it in in its original language?
For example, I want to
cite this article about the Consulate.
I can cite like this,[1] with the "quote" part left in French
Or I can do this,[2] and leave my own translation next to the original quote
Or I can do it this way,[3] and only keep my translation
@
BetweenCupsOfTea: Use the |trans-quote= parameter for the translation, though (without the parentheses). The ref should look like this.[5] (Note that the closing quotation mark is correctly positioned.)
^Menichetti, Johan (2013). "L'écriture de la constitution de l'An VIII : quelques réflexions sur l'échec d'un mécanisme révolutionnaire". Napoleonica La Revue (in French). 18 (3): 68. doi:10.3917/napo.133.0068. ISSN 2100-0123. "Ensuite, elle est la première constitution écrite à laquelle n'est pas associée une Déclaration des Droits."
^Menichetti, Johan. « L'écriture de la constitution de l'An VIII : quelques réflexions sur l'échec d'un mécanisme révolutionnaire », Napoleonica. La Revue, vol. 18, no. 3, 2013, pp. 68-83 "Ensuite, elle est la première constitution écrite à laquelle n'est pas associée une Déclaration des Droits. (In addition, it is the first constitution written to which is not affixed a declaration of rights)"
^Menichetti, Johan (2013). "L'écriture de la constitution de l'An VIII : quelques réflexions sur l'échec d'un mécanisme révolutionnaire". Napoleonica La Revue (in French). 18 (3): 68. doi:10.3917/napo.133.0068. ISSN 2100-0123."In addition, it is the first constitution written to which is not affixed a declaration of rights"
^"A site". Cela est une phrase en français (This is a sentence in French)
^"A site". Cela est une phrase en français. [This is a sentence in French.]
I PROMISE you a member of the military DOES NOT 'Win" the Medal of Honor! It is not a Contest! They are Awarded the MOH! They are presented with the MOH! They DID NOT WIN it! A little respect please.
Thank you,
Lance McAfee
Lance McAfee (
talk) 17:27, 22 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Username checks out, as they say on Reddit.
—Tamfang (
talk) 23:55, 22 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Lost my article
Hello -- I uploaded an article several weeks ago but can't find it or its status. I hardly know what questions to ask! Many thanks in advance.
FranCeska708 (
talk) 17:31, 22 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Believe it or not, I'm trying to follow instructions. I work at NYU, my assignment is to create this page but I can't figure it out! Many of our peer schools -- at NYU and beyond -- have Wiki pages so I know it's possible. When I added those two paragraphs I thought I was creating a new page for someone to approve. What is my next step, please? I read through your articles for creation link but was stymied a few steps in. *Thank you.*
FranCeska708 (
talk) 17:58, 22 April 2024 (UTC)reply
FranCeska708. Based on your statement that you work at NYU and were assigned to write this article, then your next step is to comply with the
Paid contributions disclosure. This is mandatory. You also should read
WP:BOSS.
User:FranCeska708/sandbox is entirely unreferenced and so fails the core content policy of
Verifiability. It cannot possibly be accepted into this encyclopaedia in its current form. You should read and study
Your first article. You will need to find significant coverage of this school in reliable sources that are entirely independent of NYU. Just because similar articles may exist does not mean this one should. Wikipedia has 6,815,398 articles and many of them are of poor quality and in danger of being deleted. We do not need any new poor quality articles, so strive for excellence.
Cullen328 (
talk) 18:15, 22 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Thanks for your reply, Cullen. I have slogged through many, many Wikipedia pages. I understand that connections need to be disclosed. But there are no independent sources writing about our school because we're new and obscure! If that means we don't get an article, so be it. I just figured I'd try to post first and correct mistakes afterward. (It's frustrating! If this process were smoothly delineated dya think I'd be asking goofy questions?)
FranCeska708 (
talk) 18:28, 22 April 2024 (UTC)reply
@
FranCeska708:"there are no independent sources writing about our school because we're [...] obscure" - in that case, the topic fails to meet the criteria at
WP:N and your draft will not be published. The best you can hope for is a sentence in the main NYU article - which you apparently already have. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing);
Talk to Andy;
Andy's edits 18:54, 22 April 2024 (UTC)reply
OK; I've looked it over. I wanted to see where it appeared on the pages of other NYU schools. I see it nowhere on the page for
NYU Wagner. Where is theirs?
FranCeska708 (
talk) 18:20, 22 April 2024 (UTC)reply
FranCeska708, please note that article has seven references. Your draft has none. Please also note that article is unassessed. If you want to model your article on another one, then select a
Good article.
Cullen328 (
talk) 18:27, 22 April 2024 (UTC)reply
@
FranCeska708, what do you mean by "it" and "theirs"? What are you looking for in that article?
57.140.16.48 (
talk) 18:53, 22 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Citations tool
At the bottom of a page I am editing, underneath the edit description, all the way to the right of the blue Publish changes button, I have a button that says ☑️ Citations. I think it might be from a script I installed, but I'm not sure. In any case, when it is working, it can take text such as
* {{ cite book | isbn=978-1556196027}}
and fill in most of the other fields associated with that ISBN. Often, however, it just errors, and I can't figure out what the issue is. At least once it failed one night and then worked on exactly the same text the next morning. So maybe it's just really glitchy on their end?
The text I get when it isn't working just says "Error: citations request failed".
Hello. This page is for asking for general help in how to contribute to Wikipedia. It is not apparent what your question is.
Just Step Sidewaysfrom this world ..... today 22:41, 22 April 2024 (UTC)reply
If the question is can we write a dissertation on Reconciling God's attributes in African Traditional Religion and Natural Theology, we can't.
TSventon (
talk) 22:49, 22 April 2024 (UTC)reply
So you should ideally adjust links to point to the new home above.
As for links breaking, and the sheer number of places that had that as a hardcoded link to Wikipedia... that's a shame. I advise cursing
link rot and then trying to just fix all of them if you care enough, because the information has not been deleted, merely moved.
Fluoborate (
talk) 04:49, 23 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Fluoborate has kindly given you a solution. But please note that this question has nothing to do with Wikipedia, except to note that somebody was linking to a Wikipedia article which has since been deleted. What use some other website makes of Wikipedia is not Wikipedia's responsibility
ColinFine (
talk) 10:15, 23 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Following the "ref"/"note" markup example as closely as I could, and it is only a clickable link in one direction, in both Safari and Chrome. Clicking "Note 1" where it occurs in the body (Adverse Events) does not work, although it appears blue. Clicking the "1" in the notes section at the bottom does indeed work, it provides a backlink to the body.
What have I done wrong? Very similar markup works on another page I recently annotated.
Fixed I've sorted it out for you. The easiest way to deal with footnotes is to use the {{
efn}} mechanism. You place the whole footnoted (including references) inline:"* Dyspepsia, stomach discomfort, and/or vomiting{{efn|The Phase III trials ... subjects.<ref name=DM />}}" then at the bottom in the "Notes" section add {{
notelist}}. The system then does all the hard work of linking for you.
Martin of Sheffield (
talk) 09:33, 23 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Problem going live
Hey guys,
i created my first page like 5 months ago and it still isn't live! can you guide me so my page can go live?
Mistakefinder77 (
talk) 08:39, 23 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Presumably you mean the sandbox material discussed on your own User talk page (
here) by
DoubleGrazing? If not, what page/Draft do you mean? {The poster formerly known as 87.81.230.195}
151.227.134.31 (
talk) 10:04, 23 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Publishing of new article
I Need help in publishing my new article titled Karthikeya. Can anyone help me with the submitting for review
Geoviswakarma (
talk) 09:03, 23 April 2024 (UTC)reply
@
Geoviswakarma Assuming you have an on-WP draft somewhere, put this at the top of it: {{subst:submit}}
Hope this helps. If you haven't written the article yet, start with
WP:YFA.
Gråbergs Gråa Sång (
talk) 10:14, 23 April 2024 (UTC)reply
My name is Nina, and I'm reaching out for guidance regarding updating the Wikipedia page for Envac. I work as a digital marketer at Envac, and I recently attempted to update the page using information from our company website. However, I received an email stating that all my changes were removed due to copyright concerns.
Could you please advise me on the correct procedure for updating the page? Do I need to provide any documentation as an Envac employee to verify the information? Your assistance in this matter would be greatly appreciated.
The first problem here is
WP:BOSS, as you should not edit an article if you are involved with it in some way. The other problem is that the edits at
Envac Automated Waste Collection System were deleted because they appear to have copypasted copyrighted material into the article, which is also one of the things not to do in a Wikipedia article.--♦IanMacM♦(talk to me) 12:17, 23 April 2024 (UTC)reply
@
NINASALEHI2024: In addition, you must
disclose your paid relationship with Envac as described in the aforementioned link. —
Tenryuu 🐲 (
💬 •
📝 ) 13:30, 23 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Hi, thank you so much for your response, so what should I do now whit this issu?I am an employee of Envac, and what should I do to access the edit?
NINASALEHI2024 (
talk) 13:36, 23 April 2024 (UTC)reply
@
NINASALEHI2024, you need to declare per the instructions at
WP:PAID. Then, if you wish to create an article, you need to submit a draft through Articles for Creation. Instructions are at
Help:YFA.
57.140.16.48 (
talk) 13:40, 23 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Thank you sincerely for your guidance. Should any questions arise as I proceed, I'll reach out to you. Your ongoing support is greatly appreciated.
NINASALEHI2024 (
talk) 13:42, 23 April 2024 (UTC)reply
The other thing to realise, Nina, is that Wikipedia has little interest in what the subject of an article says or wants to say about themselves, or what their associates say about them. Wikipedia is almost entirely interested in what people who have no connection with the subject, and who have not been prompted or fed information on behalf of the subject, have chosen to publish about the subject in
reliable sources. If enough material is cited from independent sources to establish
notability, a limited amount of uncontroversial factual information may be added from non-independent sources.
If the material you added was from the company's website, it is likely that very little of it would be appropriate for a Wikipedia article even without the question of copyright.
ColinFine (
talk) 15:55, 23 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Made required changes and submitted the article month ago. Still it showing waiting for review, I need update
Bvedavyas2024 (
talk) 12:43, 23 April 2024 (UTC)reply
As it says at the top of your draft, @
Bvedavyas2024, Review waiting, please be patient. Reviewers are volunteers and they have a lot of submissions to work through.
57.140.16.48 (
talk) 13:27, 23 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Also, if you have some kind of personal or professional connection to this person, please read and follow
WP:COI.
57.140.16.48 (
talk) 13:30, 23 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Your draft
Draft:Buragadda Vedavyas will be declined again as there are whole sections that are completely unreferenced. Everything in the article must be supported by reliable sources.
Shantavira|
feed me 13:34, 23 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Please guide me where i am stuck in article or if possible live help needed
Bvedavyas2024 (
talk) 13:43, 23 April 2024 (UTC)reply
@
Bvedavyas2024, the section Early life and education has no references - where did you get this information? Two of the sections under Political Career have no references, and many parts of the other sections have no references attached. Many of the items in Political Positions Held are missing references. And language such as this is inappropriate for an encyclopedia: Renowned for his transformative leadership in Krishna District, Vedavyas unwavering commitment to his constituents and notable achievements define him as a true statesman and inspirational figure. He is fondly known as Ajathashatru of Andhra Politics.
Did you take all of the photographs used in the article?
I googled “Sam and Cat” a Nickelodeon kids show, and in the Wikipedia entry on the initial google search it includes the reference to the producer Dan Schneider “who is Jewish”. When I went to the Wikipedia page itself it is not on there.
2600:1700:6222:AF90:1846:9B4C:E595:8DD9 (
talk) 14:38, 23 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Google often mistakenly says (or implies) that things exist on Wikipedia which don't actually appear in the articles. There's nothing to be done about it on this end; you'll need to take it up with Google.
57.140.16.48 (
talk) 14:46, 23 April 2024 (UTC)reply
That can happen if the article is edited after Google takes its snippet. “who is Jewish” was added at 03:47, 21 April 2024 and then reverted at 04:39, 21 April 2024.
TSventon (
talk) 14:49, 23 April 2024 (UTC)reply
(edit conflict) It's not Google's fault. It was in the article for 52 minutes Sunday.
[3]Googlebot apparently visited the page there and cached the content. It will disappear from Google results next time their bot visits.
PrimeHunter (
talk) 14:52, 23 April 2024 (UTC)reply
I was in a "no recording" session at Wikiconference North America in 2019 where we got to discuss such matters directly with people from Google, and I mentioned this issue, in the context of material that is removed or even revision deleted or supressed, yet is preserved by their scraper bots. They seemed to understand the concern but I didn't get the impression they had an easy answer. I can see how their desire to keep their snippets as up-to-date as possible is somewhat at odds with Wikipedia's desire to keep vandalism from being spread outside of WP.
Just Step Sidewaysfrom this world ..... today 18:15, 23 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Google has a system where you can be registered as owner of a website (after providing evidence) and submit a limited number of pages for fast indexing or reindexing. I have not heard of this system being used by Wikipedia.
PrimeHunter (
talk) 19:23, 23 April 2024 (UTC)reply
because it doesn't really scale well to our operation :) —
TheDJ (
talk •
contribs) 20:34, 23 April 2024 (UTC)reply
I cannot remove a hidden category
Hello! I decided to start de-orphaning some articles, but after I did that process, I cannot find the category of orphaned article to remove when I select edit source. I can see it when normally reading the article, but not when editing. Here is the article:
Abdul Aziz bin LabounPolarClimates (
talk) 16:37, 23 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Sometimes, pages are not placed in categories manually by Wikipedia editors, but by means of templates, which can be used to place identical information (including category membership information) on many different pages at once. When the information on such a template is edited, the pages containing that template are updated, but not necessarily updated immediately. This means that pages might not always appear in the most current categories.
Theroadislong (
talk) 16:43, 23 April 2024 (UTC)reply
How do I format a wikilink to a wikipedia search string, such as https://en.wikipedia.org/?fulltext=1&search=insource%3A%22dateglows.com%22&title=Special%3ASearch&ns0=1? I can do it as an external url, but am looking for the wikilink-formatted equivalent. (This is for use in user-space.)
Schazjmd(talk) 17:06, 23 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Thanks, @
ColinFine, but I didn't express my question clearly. I can create a wikilink to
Special:Search. What I'm wondering is if there is a way to include a specific search string in a
Special:Search wikilink. (The ampersands in the url are just browser artifacts.)
Schazjmd(talk) 18:00, 23 April 2024 (UTC)reply
You can put your search part after a backslash after the name Special:Search.
It seems like this page is about a topic you have a conflict in interest in (Your employer) so you will need to disclose it.
EternalNub (
talk) 19:22, 23 April 2024 (UTC)reply
You can read the conflict of interest policy
here.
EternalNub (
talk) 19:23, 23 April 2024 (UTC)reply
(
edit conflict) It sounds as if the following all apply to you:
WP:BOSS,
WP:PAID and
WP:COI. Please read through them and make the necessary declarations. If they do apply to you, then you should not edit the page directly, but make a request on the talk page explaining what changes you want and reliable sources that support them. A final point, "Cook County" could be anywhere in the world, on first glance I'd assumed New Zealand or Australia; so please qualify it with (in this case) Illinois, USA. Regards,
Martin of Sheffield (
talk) 19:25, 23 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Can I still add this info to the author's bibliography, or do I need to wait for a researcher or secondary source to say the same thing first?
R333k0o (
talk) 19:08, 23 April 2024 (UTC)reply
You're not supposed to add the info because it counts as original research, since you did the comparing yourself. So you should wait for a researcher or secondary source. See
Wikipedia:No original researchEternalNub (
talk) 20:10, 23 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Thank you for the clarification, @
EternalNub. I was doubtful if the Google Books might have been analogous to just counting "1+1=2," but per @
188.220.144.58's comment about the need for more extensive comparisons, I see why it's wise to wait.
R333k0o (
talk) 02:22, 24 April 2024 (UTC)reply
I would start a section on the
article's talk page, and ask others to search to see if they found any sources without doing original research. If you have waited over 2 days and no one has responded to the talk page, then go to the
reference desk, and ask your question there. They are very reliable and usually respond quickly. If you don't want to wait, do both first. The people who respond to the talk page usually know more about the topic (but not always).
Frequently, though not always, a book that has been republished in the same language under a different title has a note on the copyright page (nearly always on the reverse or 'verso' of the title page) stating that it was originally/previously published under a different title.
If the retitled edition contains such a statement, it should be acceptable as a 'reliable source', just as the book is considered a 'reliable source' for any plot or contents summary of it. In such a case, you could (in my opinion) therefore cite the retitled edition's copyright page as the source for the retitling. Since the 'verso' is often not included in the work's main (Arabic numerals) text pagination and not physically numbered in the '
prelims' (Roman numerals) pagination even if used, you might have to 'calculate' the verso's prelims page number (which ought to be even rather than odd, and is frequently iv, with i–ii being the half-title leaf and iii–iv being the title page and its verso) – I think this would be acceptable analysis rather than synthesis.
Note however that non-fiction works in particular may be expanded and republished under a new title: in such a case the book is effectively at minimum a 'new ("revised", "expanded", etc.) edition', or for more extensive expansions or reworkings a different work altogether, even if it contains some of the older text. You might need to conduct extensive text comparisons to find out if this is or is not the case. This is most easily done with actual printed copies of the volumes in question. {The poster formerly known as 87.81.2309.195}
188.220.144.58 (
talk) 01:00, 24 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Thanks for the advice, @188.220.144.58. The copyright page didn't contain the original title, so this may likely be a reworking. I'll follow @
Avishai11's suggestion about starting conversations to see if anyone can verify that.
R333k0o (
talk) 02:27, 24 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Another thing to note is that Wikipedia does not strive for completeness. If a book has not been the subject of indpendent discussion, does it even belong in the article?
ColinFine (
talk) 10:20, 24 April 2024 (UTC)reply
On completeness,
R333k0o: The only reference for the article
Gustavo Gabriel Levene is a review of one of this books; this is the source, it seems, for just one sentence within the article. The reader is given no reason to trust anything else that the article says. Referencing what the text says is, I suggest, more important than pointing out that two books with different titles share the same content (if they indeed do so). --
Hoary (
talk) 12:47, 24 April 2024 (UTC)reply
How to change colors of template/infobox?
I've been trying to update the templates/infoboxes related to the
Houston Texans to reflect a new color scheme, but I can't find any information related to changing the colors; additionally, some templates have extended protection.
ExpergeTech (
talk) 20:37, 23 April 2024 (UTC)reply
I've noticed that some articles have a sidebar about a specific topics with links to articles related to it, like
this one Pi template. I'd like to have the same sidebar in other languages, and I'd like to know if there's an easy or practical way to do it. I'm not really sure how to use these templates in general. Thanks in advance.
HallyTall (
talk) 21:46, 23 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Hello. There is no general way to transfer content from one Wikipedia to another - it usually has to be done as a copy and paste (with suitable attribution, of course: see
copying within Wikipedia).
This applies just as much to templates as any other kind of page. Furthermore, templates often depend on other templates, and sometimes on Lua
modules, so you would need to make sure that the resources that the template depended on were transferred, and translated if necessary.
ColinFine (
talk) 22:33, 23 April 2024 (UTC)reply
HallyTall, what other languages are you interested in translating it to? Because
Template:Pi box uses
Template:Sidebar directly, and because {{
Sidebar}} has equivalents in 130 languages, it might be possible to design a
wrapper template in a foreign language that would interpret the English Pi template with no changes and render the correct output in the foreign Wikipedia, in the same way that the
non-English citation templates like {{
cite web/French}} and {{
cite book/German}} can interpret a French or German citation here at English Wikipedia and display it correctly. Because most of the actual links are names of people, those would likely have the same name in foreign Wikipedias, in most cases, so probably would generate blue links if the article exists already. Alternatively, since there aren't that many Sidebar params involved, it might be easier just to find the corresponding param names, e.g., for Spanish it is at
es:Plantilla:Navegación vertical, but it suffers from very poor documentation, so you would have to read the Template code to find out what the analogous parameters are called. The German one at
de:Vorlage:Seitenleiste has no documentation at all.
Mathglot (
talk) 05:14, 24 April 2024 (UTC)reply
I've mostly thought about translating some templates to Spanish, but as you've said, the template for the sidebar is very poorly documented. Would you think it reasonable to grab the original template (say, the
Template:Pi box) and simply replace the name of the parameters? Like changing heading1 to seccion1 and so on?
HallyTall (
talk) 17:14, 24 April 2024 (UTC)reply
@
HallyTall: yes, I think that's reasonable, if you can work out the correspondence of names despite the poor documentation. Ping me from there if you need anything.
Mathglot (
talk) 18:19, 24 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Ref number 5 is all in red, please repair if you can, thanks
115.70.23.77 (
talk) 23:57, 23 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Can't.
Template:Cite journal unsurprisingly requires specification of the title of the journal. This can't be done here, as whatever it is that's linked to, it's clearly neither a journal nor a journal article. Of course, Template:Cite journal can be changed to Template:Cite [something else]; but here, to what? What's linked to looks as if it was compiled by one Richard Middleton, who I suppose was/is a genealogy enthusiast. It's not clear to me that it was sub-edited or by some other criterion is a "reliable source". Further, what's it being cited for? Here's what: In 1866, his daughter Jane Dorothea Bloxam (died 1921) married Sir Henry Hanson Berney, 9th Bart. (died 1907). Sir Henry and Lady Berney's grandson was cricketer Cecil Middleton, son of Henry Middleton who, in April 1900, reportedly witnessed at Filey Brigg the drowning of his first cousin Margaret Middleton. Margaret's sister Gertrude and their cousin Henry Middleton were both students at Oxford University, Bloxham's alma mater. This in an article that purports to be about somebody who died in 1878. Why the stuff about his grandkids? (How does it add to our understanding of Andrew Bloxam?) --
Hoary (
talk) 01:55, 24 April 2024 (UTC)reply
PS
Template:Cite web would work, and if this isn't a reliable source then it is at least an interesting one, reporting on its own refreshingly unconventional and lively Annual General Meetings. But if these factors mitigate, they nevertheless fail to show me how the marriage of the subject's daughter (let alone how such matters as the reported witnessing of such-and-such by the subject's great-grandson) tells us anything about the subject. Would you care to explain, OP? --
Hoary (
talk) 05:02, 24 April 2024 (UTC)reply
April 24 Information
My Wiki page was deleted without reason
My Wiki page was on a fictional character. just as real as if someone did a page on a video game character. I sited where I got the information from and gave credit to the creator of the subject. Also the message I got was unclear with what was wrong with my Wiki page.
-Bojankles
I looked at your deleted page. It was just some garbage you made up. This is an encyclopedia, not a place to just publish any thought that enters your head.
Just Step Sidewaysfrom this world ..... today 00:13, 24 April 2024 (UTC)reply
There are tons of dumb thinks on Wikipedia
BOJANKLES (
talk) 05:01, 24 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Mine isn't the only one
BOJANKLES (
talk) 05:01, 24 April 2024 (UTC)reply
And, I didn't make it up. Someone else made it up. Just like The legend of Zelda, Just like DND, just like pokemon. And there are wiki pages on lots of those.
BOJANKLES (
talk) 05:03, 24 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Thank you for giving a nice reply, I really appreciate this even if it is still not quite what I wanted.
BOJANKLES (
talk) 05:04, 24 April 2024 (UTC)reply
BOJANKLES, you seem to have a misunderstanding about the purpose of Wikipedia. This is an encyclopedia consisting of articles about topics that reliable, independent sources have written about. We simply summarize those reliable sources. As for fictional characters, we have an article about
Prince Hamlet because reliable sources independent of Shakespeare have been writing about the character for over 400 years. Similarly,
Mickey Mouse has been a sensation for 95 years and reliable sources continue to write about him today. We do not host articles about newly created characters that have not yet been discussed extensively by reliable soures.
Cullen328 (
talk) 08:34, 24 April 2024 (UTC)reply
@
PrimeHunter: Do you know what the best way of handling the issue in the meantime is? Is there an easy way to convert the file to another format, for instance?
Graham (
talk) 03:01, 25 April 2024 (UTC)reply
@
Graham11:phab:T283646 says some display sizes may work but the only working size I have found is the original 630px, too much for an infobox. The only stable fix I know is to upload a new file in another format but I don't know a good conversion program. It may work to reupload the WebP file in the exact size displayed by the infobox but that size can vary between users so it's a poor solution.
PrimeHunter (
talk) 14:38, 25 April 2024 (UTC)reply
How to correct incorrect birthplace in artcile?
Hi,
In the article regarding me
Jon Speelman my place of birth us incorrect - itt should be London. How do U remedy this please?
87.75.101.89 (
talk) 10:37, 24 April 2024 (UTC)reply
I have removed the unsourced birthplace.
TSventon (
talk) 10:50, 24 April 2024 (UTC)reply
I notice that Jon Speelman is also listed in
Cromer#Notable people. I will remove the entry.
This source gives his birthplace as Marylebone, London. Do we think it's
Reliable for our purposes? {The poster formerly known as 87.81.230.195}
188.220.144.58 (
talk) 13:10, 24 April 2024 (UTC)reply
It appears reliable enough to use IMvHO.
Mjroots (
talk) 13:35, 24 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Local news
Is there any WP guidance/essay/whatever that speaks of "local news" (as in regional newspapers etc) in the context of WP:N, WP:RS, WP:NPOV etc?
Gråbergs Gråa Sång (
talk) 11:41, 24 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Wikipedia is not a instruction book, or a manual (see
WP:NOTMANUAL). This is a Help Desk, for people who need help editing. In your case, you should probably contact Netflix Support (
https://help.netflix.com/). Good luck!
If you can load Wikipedia articles but not the images in them, it may be a problem with your own internet connection. Try to check again from an area with a better wifi. Wifi connections may also get slow if there are way too many people trying to use it all at the same time.
Cambalachero (
talk) 17:56, 24 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Editing our page
I'm looking for help on how to edit our Wikipedia page. We have a lot of incomplete information that I would like to complete
Jhammers (
talk) 19:27, 24 April 2024 (UTC)reply
To contribute to the article(not just a "page") about your organization, please use its associated article talk page to make a formal
edit request(click for instructions), detailing changes you feel are needed.
331dot (
talk) 19:39, 24 April 2024 (UTC)reply
I'll also provide instructions on your user talk page.
331dot (
talk) 19:40, 24 April 2024 (UTC)reply
I'm afraid that the article
Accesswire is nothing like a Wikipedia article, and I am dubious that it can be made into one. As 331dot says, you should not edit it, but instead should make edit requests. But in my view, the only thing worth doing to that article is to find some reliable sources where people who are wholly unconnected with Accesswire or Issuer Direct have chosen to write at some length about Accesswire.
The thing to understand is that Wikipedia has little interest in what the subject of an article says or wants to say about themselves, or what their associates say about them. Wikipedia is almost entirely interested in what people who have no connection with the subject, and who have not been prompted or fed information on behalf of the subject, have chosen to publish about the subject in
reliable sources. If enough material is cited from independent sources to establish
notability, a limited amount of uncontroversial factual information may be added from non-independent sources. Since all of the current sources cited are closely connected with Accesswire, the article does not at present appear to represent any independent evaluation of the company. Frankly, I am baffled as to why an editor as experienced as
Rehman should have created such a feeble article at all.
ColinFine (
talk) 21:16, 24 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Editing a page made by an institution to give a good image of themselves
Hi!
I just started recently as a Wikipedia editor. My initial goal was just to help fix small grammar errors, but I have stumbled into a very particular article of an educational institution.
This article talks about elements of the university and its history without indicating any source for it. On the other hand, Im not sure if an statement such as "the university was formed after the dissolution of this two universities" requires a citation or not.
Moreover, the article uses very subjective words to describe the quality, instalations, etc. of the institution. In my humble opinion its clearly a promotional article. What is the procedure for this? Should I add the template of "Source required" after each of those type of sentences?
thanks for your reply! Yes, the page is already flagged as promotional tone so I guess there isn't much else to do.
FranGallego33 (
talk) 00:16, 25 April 2024 (UTC)reply
The comment made at the bottom of this page
Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:The Monument Mythos by an IP editor seems very inappropriate to me (it's pretty much cheering on for someone to die by suicide), should it maybe be deleted from the edit history?
★Trekker (
talk) 05:08, 25 April 2024 (UTC)reply
This
request for help from administrators has been answered. If you need more help or have additional questions, please reapply the {{admin help}} template, or contact the responding user(s) directly on their own user talk page.
Because only css pages in the template namespace get the right annotation for that. You can either create in template space and move to Wikipedia, OR ask someone to use Special:ChangeContentModel to modify the page to have the right annotation. —
TheDJ (
talk •
contribs) 09:43, 25 April 2024 (UTC)reply
@
PrimeHunter: Yes, you guessed right! I saw an example of editcontentmodel in English Wikipedia, but I could not find it in Persian Wikipedia. Thank you very much for your complete explanation. best PereopticTalk✉️ 15:13, 25 April 2024 (UTC)reply
What is ../wiki/.. as in Wikipedia URLs?
I am trying to understand more about Wikipedia's use of URLs. I can not understand the purpose of the /wiki/ part in a URL such as en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Onion. Why not just have en.wikipedia.org/Onion. Any help on this would be very much appreciated.
Gourdiehill (
talk) 12:05, 25 April 2024 (UTC)reply
@
PrimeHunter I understand some of your answer but not fully. Also there are a number of separate but related issues. It is a bit confusing that en.wikipedia.org/?title=Onion and en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Onion both return the same web page. Wouldn't it be best if the page was accessed by en.wikipedia.org/Onion? I feel the URLs should be meaningful to users but if too much functionality gets attached to them they start to become meaningless (speaking for myself anyway).
Gourdiehill (
talk) 15:11, 25 April 2024 (UTC)reply
@
Gourdiehill: It's practical for some applications that there are other ways to see pages and associated information. / has a lot of parameters to see different things.
/info/en/?search=Onion is the canonical ("official") URL for the wiki page. The html for
https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Onion says <link rel="canonical" href="/info/en/?search=Onion">. See
canonical link element for the feature. Some wikis do have url's similar to en.wikipedia.org/Onion. It's easier to type and may look prettier to readers but as mentioned, it has advantages to have a clear distinction between wiki pages and other pages at the same website. MediaWiki controls it with
mw:Manual:$wgArticlePath. It's set to '/wiki/$1' in all Wikimedia wikis with code in
https://noc.wikimedia.org/conf/highlight.php?file=InitialiseSettings.php and
https://noc.wikimedia.org/conf/highlight.php?file=CommonSettings.php. You are very unlikely to get this changed. If you didn't understand my webcrawler argument then let me elaborate a little. Google and many other websites have automated programs visiting millions (probably billions in total) of Wikipedia pages, typically so they can be included in search results for their users. Disallow: /w/ is a convenient way to tell them "Don't waste resources visiting page histories, diffs and other non-wiki pages". If they did then it would cost both them and us significant money, and they wouldn't visit as many pages we do want them to visit.
PrimeHunter (
talk) 15:58, 25 April 2024 (UTC)reply
@
PrimeHunter:Thanks very much for that interesting explanation. I did not know about
Canonical link element so have read about that. I became interested in this because I wanted to make use of Wiktionary as an API for a website I am making. I am not finding it very easy as I am running into CORS issues when I make requests. I am rather out of my depth and I have seen there are some issues with MediaWiki APIs but I thought it ought to be possible to make an Ajax request from my site to retrieve the English Wiktionary page for translations of a particular word. I am finding the API documentation very difficult!
Gourdiehill (
talk) 16:32, 25 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Paula Vennels in search
Hi
I was looking for the
Paula Vennells article earlier and as I typed here name incrementally into the search box, nothing seemed to match. I did eventually find the article and when I paste the full name into the search box, it did find it. Is this normal behaviour?
Fob.schools (
talk) 13:40, 25 April 2024 (UTC)reply
@
Fob.schools: I got the same result. It's not normal unless the page was created in the last day and hasn't been indexed yet by the autocompletion feature, but the page is from 2019. I have moved it without leaving a redirect and then moved it back to register a new creation of the page name for indexing. It still gives the same result but that's expected right now. It will hopefully be indexed correctly within a day.
PrimeHunter (
talk) 14:21, 25 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Judge Russell asked me to help him replace the photo currently on his page with his formal headshot.
John D. Russell (judge)
I created a wiki account and uploaded an image and tagged his page, but I don't know how to completely replace the current image and use the new one:
File:JRussell.jpg
If you have a personal relationship with Judge Russell, you should also review
WP:COI to see whether it applies to you, and follow the instructions there.
57.140.16.48 (
talk) 15:07, 25 April 2024 (UTC)reply
I hired the photographer that took the photo and have rights to the image. He used to work at GableGotwals before he was appointed as a judge and he asked me to help him get the existing photo on his wiki page replaced with his formal headshot I tried to upload.
GableGotwalsLaw (
talk) 15:10, 25 April 2024 (UTC)reply
@
GableGotwalsLaw, if your username represents a company rather than an individual, I recommend requesting a change of username -
WP:CHU has instructions - lest your account be blocked on that basis. A username needs to represent you as an individual. "[Name] at GableGotwalsLaw" would be acceptable, for instance (no need to use your real name).
Photographers typically retain the rights to photos they are hired to take unless it is a formal
work for hire. I don't know whether this applies in your case.
Someone may come along and add the image for you if they like; if they don't, I would recommend making a formal edit request on the talk page,
Talk:John D. Russell (judge), since you seem to have a COI here.
57.140.16.48 (
talk) 16:08, 25 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Ah. Account got blocked while I was typing out all that.
57.140.16.48 (
talk) 16:13, 25 April 2024 (UTC)reply
How to set the extent of the lead section? (Infobox shows up too soon on mobile view)
In
the mobile view for Fermat number (with a narrow enough screen width so as to make the infobox inline), the infobox appears before the lead section actually ends. "A Fermat number [..] is a positive integer of the form {INFOBOX} ". I figure this is because there's a line break between "form" and the formula. Is there a way to adjust this, such that the lead section is explicitly defined?
Coolreader18 (
talk) 15:15, 25 April 2024 (UTC)reply
I was reading
Canonical link element and I saw a paragraph (
Imgur link) where the example URLs aren't being rendered in monospace font as they should; inspecting the element confirms that those two spans of text are supposed to be monospace. I
copied the code over to my sandbox and it rendered as it should have. Is this a problem only on my end? I've tried refreshing the article page, purging it, and clearing my cache to see if that would fix it, but no dice. —
Tenryuu 🐲 (
💬 •
📝 ) 16:19, 25 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Fixed for me by removing {{
mono}} from inside a link earlier in the page.
[5] I don't know exactly why if failed but the template uses
Wikipedia:TemplateStyles which has complicated rules.
PrimeHunter (
talk) 16:47, 25 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Thanks! That's a strange interaction. Looks like using the deprecated tt tags seems to circumvent this. —
Tenryuu 🐲 (
💬 •
📝 ) 16:52, 25 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Where should I discuss a redirect?
We have
a whole page entitled "Redirects for Discussion". However, I can't tell if that's merely a euphemism for "Redirects for possible Deletion." I do know that many redirects listed end up neither deleted nor merely retained, but transformed in some way.
I
disagree with
Natg 19 on whether to convert
a redirect to...something intermediate between a
disambig page and a
stub. If my revision had stuck and the page were no longer a redirect, I would attempt to start a discussion at
the corresponding talk page. But my revision was reverted, and the page is a redirect right now.
Consequently non-technically-minded editors might struggle to find the talk page. Should I initiate discussion there anyways or take it to RfD?
Bernanke's Crossbow, why not start a discussion at
Talk:Mercury-vapor lamp. I am not convinced by your version, as disambig pages should help with navigation and stubs should be notable, and I don't think the new page does either.
TSventon (
talk) 18:15, 25 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Article not showing on Visual Editor linking
Hi! I have been trying to create a draft for a corresponding article in the Italian Wikipedia that is Operation Strade sicure, so I created
Draft: Operation Strade sicure but I am having trouble trying to link words to the Autostrada A3 which I have tried to search for but it kept directing me to
List of A3 roads with the article not showing up. I mainly use visual editor and I don't know how to link things via source editing. I've read every search result, but it kept linking to other pages.
Asvro (
talk) 18:19, 25 April 2024 (UTC)reply
On behalf to @
Asvro, the problem has been fixed. Thank you. 2003LN6 18:31, 25 April 2024 (UTC)reply
draft afc submission in my userpage
for fun and as a joke, i decided to copy the "draft afc submission" box from a draft lying around, and put it in my userpage with the heading "submit to me"
i would like to know out of curiosity, what would happen if i, or someone else, submits the "draft (that is my userpage)" for review?
i apologize if this is not the right place for me to ask things. i've had a look at the "
am i in the right place" page; another place i could be in is the
village pump for technical stuff but what i'm asking probably isn't a bug, so i'm here. —
ppr22📄 18:41, 25 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Paper2222, it's clear that you have put a lot of effort into your user page and your signature. As this is, after all, an encyclopedia, how about putting effort into improving articles? --
Hoary (
talk) 21:44, 25 April 2024 (UTC)reply