Hi, thanks for doing that list of past moves, did you come across how the current title was arrived at? Looking at the list, between 28 August 2007 and before 3 May 2009? Selfstudier ( talk) 17:23, 23 August 2022 (UTC)
- Ah, nvm, I found it was done without RM in June 2008 :)
Selfstudier (
talk) 18:07, 23 August 2022 (UTC)
- @ Selfstudier: Yeah, that one was done by CJCurrie without an RM. That being said, it's possible I missed other RMs (especially if they were done on centralized pages such as the discussion on 26 June 2006), so do feel free to add others if you come across them. Graham ( talk) 02:18, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
When you engage in discussions using the name Graham, I get all your notifications. Please use Graham11. Graham talk/ mail/ e 03:01, 25 August 2022 (UTC)
- @ User:Graham this made me chuckle lol Stephanie921 ( talk) 02:52, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
Thank you for copy editing the draft of the RfC on the deployment of Vector (2022). Given that you've read the text carefully, do you maybe have any opinion about anything we've shared there? For example, any thoughts on the questions in the ombox? SGrabarczuk (WMF) ( talk) 15:15, 5 September 2022 (UTC)
While I you might not feel that this work is important, this information was well researched and offers more information about what RFO was doing in his time as a MP. Most MP pages don't have a lot of information about the work they do. I do not see the harm in including this information unless the goal is to limit peoples access to information. There is also not a lot of space where well researched information like this can be made available. I am asking if you could restore the information. Robert-Falcon Ouellette
thank-you SongShuMa ( talk) 21:29, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:AEFO logo.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. HapHaxion ( talk / contribs) 16:49, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
The file File:OECTA logo.jpeg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Redundant to File:OECTA logo.svg which is hosted on Commons
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
files for discussion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Salavat (
talk) 00:31, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 01:13, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
| 2023 WikiProject Organized Labour/Online Edit-A-Thon | |
|---|---|
 |
Hello, Graham11! During the entire month of February there will be an ongoing edit-a-thon on all labour related projects across English Wikipedia and sister projects. Register to track your edits and sign up on the edit-a-thon's project page as a participant. To invite other participants paste {{ subst:WPLABOR/2023}} on their talk page! This event is organized by WP:WikiProject Organized Labour |
Myotus ( talk) 15:28, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
Your editing on Canada could be disruptive. What's your logic behind not capitalizing a proper noun? Estar8806 ( talk) 03:46, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
- Hi,
Estar8806. In the context in which it is being used, the term is not a proper noun. Additionally, we must observe the guidance at
MOS:OFFICE, which you can see has been applied (by editors other than myself) throughout the rest of the article. The lowercase style is necessary there for internal consistency.
Graham (
talk) 03:49, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
- What is the context in which it is being used? MOS:OFFICE uses capitalization for circumstances where a title is denoted (ex. "Richard Nixon was President of the United States"), and no capitalization for circumstances where a description is being denoted (ex. "Richard Nixon was the president of the United States."). In the case of an infobox, it is clearly referring to the title by maintaining the location to place the incumbent officeholder's name. And further, it is my understanding that the term is always capitalized in front of the officeholder's name anyway.
- For your convenience, I am providing examples of other inboxes where you may see the correct capitalization:
- Estar8806 ( talk) 03:56, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Canterbury Tail talk 12:11, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
Hi - I see you have moved a few articles relating to Canadian military people. There is extensive precedent for including the country in the disambiguation. We use "(British Army officer)" consistently to disambiguate all British Army officers e.g. Colin Mackenzie (British Army officer). We also use "(United States Army officer)" to disambiguate United States Army officers e.g. Richard Marshall (United States Army officer) and "(Canadian army officer)" seems to be in widespread use to disambiguate Canadian Army officers as well. Also, if you are moving articles, please remember to observe WP:MV#POST. I am minded to move them back to maintain consistency but would like to hear your thoughts first. Thanks, Dormskirk ( talk) 23:57, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
- Hi,
Dormskirk! I moved those three articles to use the disambiguator "(general)" as I have found it to be in fairly common use and, more importantly, disambiguators are not normally longer than is necessary to identify the subject. As
WP:NCPDAB provides in regards to disambiguators for biographies,
The disambiguator is usually a noun indicating what the person is noted for being in their own right. In most cases, these nouns are standard, commonly used tags such as "(musician)" and "(politician)". Avoid using abbreviations or anything capitalized ..., that is apart from instances where more specific guidelines specify particular exceptions. If possible, limit the tag to a single, recognizable and highly applicable term.
Sometimes disambiguators need to be more specific. For example, "Engelbert Humperdinck (musician)" could still refer to two different people, so Engelbert Humperdinck (composer) and Engelbert Humperdinck (singer) are used. Or, failing a practical single qualifier, the disambiguator can be expanded with a second qualifier: e.g. Roger Taylor (Queen drummer) and Roger Taylor (Duran Duran drummer).
- Just as we wouldn't use "(Canadian politician)" to identify a subject's nationality if there were not another politician of the same name and we wouldn't use "(Duran Duran drummer)" to identify the organization a subject was with if there were not another drummer of the same name, the case of an army general seems no different. Further disambiguation isn't necessary because, as WP:PRECISION provides, "Usually, titles should unambiguously define the topical scope of the article, but should be no more precise than that."
- Re WP:MV § POST, sorry that I forgot to update the navboxes! I'll do my best to try to remember in future. Graham ( talk) 01:54, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
Can I interest you in becoming a Template editor? — Martin ( MSGJ · talk) 10:03, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
- @
MSGJ: Yes, that would actually be very helpful if I could!
Graham (
talk) 23:21, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
- Okay, I think you meet all of the criteria. The only thing which gives me pause is the edit warring incident mentioned above. I don't need to stress how undesirable it would be to have an edit war on a template, an it seems you are a stickler for style ... — Martin ( MSGJ · talk) 20:13, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
On 21 February 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Jane Dempsey Douglass, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Jane Dempsey Douglass became the first woman to head a worldwide communion of churches in 1990? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Jane Dempsey Douglass. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page ( here's how, Jane Dempsey Douglass), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
-- RoySmith (talk) 00:03, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
Hi! A few months ago, you tagged International Religious Freedom Act of 1998 with a suggestion that Protect Cemeteries Act should be merged into it. Usually, after an article is merge-tagged, the editor starts a discussion at the talk page of the target article, in this case Talk:International Religious Freedom Act of 1998, briefly explaining the rationale for the merge. it gives interested editors a chance to chime in. Joyous! | Talk 03:11, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Douglas John Hall.jpeg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of non-free use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of non-free use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:
- Go to
the file description page and add the text
{{ Di-replaceable non-free use disputed|<your reason>}}below the original replaceable non-free use template, replacing<your reason>with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable. - On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.
Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly ( talk) 07:41, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Jane Dempsey Douglass.jpeg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of non-free use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of non-free use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:
- Go to
the file description page and add the text
{{ Di-replaceable non-free use disputed|<your reason>}}below the original replaceable non-free use template, replacing<your reason>with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable. - On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.
Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly ( talk) 07:44, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
RE: the place names/links you changed here at Gerald M. Morin, is there a specific place in the MOS (or any other guideline, etc.) that indicates it should be done like that? I ask because I've seen numerous other articles that purposely omit "Canada" from the infobox (I think I saw someone remove it once and point to a MOS link... can't seem to recall where to look for that though), and that link the place name by including the province (e.g., Cumberland House, Saskatchewan), instead of separating the two (e.g. Cumberland House, Saskatchewan). Rowing007 ( talk) 19:58, 28 April 2023 (UTC)
- With respect to the inclusion of "Canada", it's standard practice to include the country as not all readers are familiar with all countries' internal subdivisions. Regarding linking, I'm not sure if the MOS addresses it directly. I tend to see
[[Los Angeles|Los Angeles, California]]or[[Los Angeles]], Californiamore on American articles (presumably because of the way US city articles are titled per WP:USPLACE) and[[Vancouver]], [[British Columbia]]or[[Vancouver]], British Columbiamore on articles about other countries. Graham ( talk) 20:09, 28 April 2023 (UTC)- Right, but Los Angeles and Vancouver are both standalone page names.
Cumberland House, Saskatchewan, to bring it back to the article in question, is not. I'm saying that the style I've seen which seems to be favoured is
Cumberland House, Saskatchewan, rather than
Cumberland House,
Saskatchewan. Look at
List of people from London, Ontario, for example. Two people I just picked at random on that list:
Tom Benner and
Justin Bieber; both articles use
London, Ontario, not
London,
Ontario.
Rowing007 (
talk) 20:25, 28 April 2023 (UTC)
- I'm not sure that whether the city/town/place article title includes the province name is pertinent as, per MOS:CANADA, the province is only included in the article title for the purpose of disambiguation. The question of whether the province is linked separately in this article doesn't seem connected to whether or not there is a place somewhere else in the world called Cumberland House. Graham ( talk) 20:32, 28 April 2023 (UTC)
- Right, but Los Angeles and Vancouver are both standalone page names.
Cumberland House, Saskatchewan, to bring it back to the article in question, is not. I'm saying that the style I've seen which seems to be favoured is
Cumberland House, Saskatchewan, rather than
Cumberland House,
Saskatchewan. Look at
List of people from London, Ontario, for example. Two people I just picked at random on that list:
Tom Benner and
Justin Bieber; both articles use
London, Ontario, not
London,
Ontario.
Rowing007 (
talk) 20:25, 28 April 2023 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Fair Vote Canada logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 17:17, 15 August 2023 (UTC)
Moved to
Talk:United States § U.S. vs. USHi Graham11, I've undone your edit to United States, as it does not follow consensus or the MOS. The MOS is clear: "retain U.S. in American or Canadian English articles in which it is already established, unless there is a good reason to change it". There was no good reason to change it here. There was only a single instance of "UK" being used; I've fixed that by changing it to "United Kingdom". Please don't make changes like that again without getting consensus. Thank you! -- Rockstone Send me a message! 22:34, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 00:40, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Sorry! Firefangledfeathers ( talk / contribs) 04:44, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
Category:15th-century Christian universalists has been nominated for merging
Category:15th-century Christian universalists has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason ( talk) 19:37, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Hi, I was wondering why my edit was reversed although in the cited article it states that she left the party? Gojetsgo55 ( talk) 07:25, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
- @
Gojetsgo55: I am so sorry – I'm sure I checked the article you cited more than once, but somehow I missed that line each time. I'll be sure to revert myself, and please accept my apologies.
Graham (
talk) 00:56, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you Graham and it’s all good!
- Happy Editing! Gojetsgo55 ( talk) 18:50, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Hello Graham11!
- The New Pages Patrol is currently struggling to keep up with the influx of new articles needing review. We could use a few extra hands to help.
- We think that someone with your activity and experience is very likely to meet the guidelines for granting.
- Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time, but it requires a strong understanding of Wikipedia’s CSD policy and notability guidelines.
- Kindly read the tutorial before making your decision, and feel free to post on the project talk page with questions.
- If patrolling new pages is something you'd be willing to help out with, please consider applying here.
Thank you for your consideration. We hope to see you around!
MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 15:20, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Hi, sorry, but I've removed the {{ cn}} tag you attached to the heading "Central Manitoba" at List of regions of Manitoba because it isn't apparent what's meant to be verified, as no assertion was being made. Largoplazo ( talk) 12:07, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
Cambrian Credit Union moved to draftspace
Thanks for your contributions to Cambrian Credit Union. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Cleo Cooper ( talk) 06:31, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Cambrian Credit Union logo.webp. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- Min☠︎rax«¦ talk¦» 11:41, 24 April 2024 (UTC)