< 1 February | 3 February > |
---|
The result was Speedy Delete - WP:G3 (non-admin closure). Whpq ( talk) 16:06, 8 February 2012 (UTC) reply
I only found Wikipedia reprints. SL93 ( talk) 23:53, 2 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. Xavexgoem ( talk) 15:56, 12 February 2012 (UTC) reply
Zero in gnews, 1 passing reference in gbooks (at best), zero refs, a dictionary def. Tagged for notability and lack of refs for well over a year. Created by an SPA. Epeefleche ( talk) 20:40, 25 January 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was redirect to Tweet (singer). King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 20:02, 10 February 2012 (UTC) reply
Poorly sourced page about an album which seems like it's never going to be released (the article has been here since 2007). ׺°”˜`”°º× ηυηzια׺°”˜`”°º× 16:50, 25 January 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy delete. A7. Drmies ( talk) 04:46, 3 February 2012 (UTC) reply
Non-notable actress. IMDb shows just a couple of minor roles, so the lack of RS's is to be expected. Nolelover Talk· Contribs 23:04, 2 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was speedily deleted by User:Drmies under criteria A7 - "Article about a band, singer, musician, or musical ensemble, which does not indicate the importance or significance of the subject". (non-admin closure). Dylanfromthenorth ( talk) 22:43, 5 February 2012 (UTC) reply
Musician. Has three self published albums. Does covers of old soul singers. Article has been around since 2008. Reference in the article is by his agent. Unable to find any reliable references that are about him. I can find notices on performances or him being a judge at a local contest. Bgwhite ( talk) 23:00, 2 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy delete. No claim of notability. Drmies ( talk) 05:05, 3 February 2012 (UTC) reply
No indications that this particular organization meets the criteria for inclusion. WikiDan61 ChatMe! ReadMe!! 22:40, 2 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was discussion closed as moot, article speedily deleted (G11) by Drmies. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 18:01, 3 February 2012 (UTC) reply
Seems to fail WP:CORP, all sources provided are either self published press releases or their own website. Karl 334 ☞TALK to ME ☜ 22:08, 2 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was Speedy delete, non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 01:14, 3 February 2012 (UTC) reply
Article has been speedy deleted 3 times before and has been put up again as G11 (I've removed that to bring it here). Original author is intent of it being here. I think best to have a full consensus of opinions as to the suitability of this page, then if consensus is to delete then we bury it once and for all or maybe offer userifcation Ronhjones (Talk) 22:07, 2 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. — Tom Morris ( talk) 10:42, 10 February 2012 (UTC) reply
I cannot find substantial, independent, RS coverage for this software product on gnew or gbooks. Tagged for notability since May. Created by an SPA. Epeefleche ( talk) 21:59, 2 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. — Tom Morris ( talk) 10:42, 10 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The subject of the article appears to be a non-notable software company. The subject lacks significant coverage in reliable third party sources and fails the notability guidelines for organizations. Alpha_Quadrant (talk) 21:47, 2 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. — Tom Morris ( talk) 10:41, 10 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The subject of the article appears to be a non-notable software company. The subject lacks significant coverage in reliable third party sources and fails to meet the notability guidelines for organizations. Alpha_Quadrant (talk) 21:39, 2 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. — Tom Morris ( talk) 10:41, 10 February 2012 (UTC) reply
DICDEF, Essay, pick one. Doesn't establish the notability of the subject matter as a stand alone topic. Dennis Brown ( talk) 21:22, 2 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. — Tom Morris ( talk) 10:41, 10 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The subject of the article appears to be a non-notable software company. The subject lacks significant coverage in reliable third party sources and fails to meet the notability guidelines for organizations. Alpha_Quadrant (talk) 21:05, 2 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. — Tom Morris ( talk) 10:41, 10 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The subject of the article appears to be a non-notable software company. The subject lacks significant coverage in reliable third party sources and fails to meet the notability guidelines for organizations. Alpha_Quadrant (talk) 20:40, 2 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. — Tom Morris ( talk) 10:40, 10 February 2012 (UTC) reply
This marketing company lacks substantial RS coverage in gnews and gbooks. Created by an SPA. Epeefleche ( talk) 20:13, 2 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. — Tom Morris ( talk) 10:40, 10 February 2012 (UTC) reply
I cannot find significant RS coverage of this on gnews or gbooks. Created by an SPA. Epeefleche ( talk) 20:04, 2 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. — Tom Morris ( talk) 10:39, 10 February 2012 (UTC) reply
Non-notable family newsletter failing WP:NOTABILITY. Created and Maintained by WP:SPA WP:COI accounts. They dont even have a "real" website, instead they are using Wikipedia as their "official Website page" see Basic Information in this section-> website. Wikipedia is NOT a vehicle for Advertising Hu12 ( talk) 15:44, 2 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was Speedy Deleted as Copyvio per the below. UltraExactZZ Said ~ Did 16:03, 2 February 2012 (UTC) reply
Per WP:NOTHOWTO Dipankan In the woods? 14:25, 2 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 19:49, 10 February 2012 (UTC) reply
This player fails WP:GNG and WP:FOOTYN. Malaysian Premier League is not top-tier. Cloudz 679 14:22, 2 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. — Tom Morris ( talk) 10:44, 10 February 2012 (UTC) reply
non-existent genre, request for sources, to establish notability, produced nothing. Semitransgenic talk. 12:44, 2 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was redirect to List of The X Factor finalists (U.S. season 1)#Drew. ( non-admin closure) Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talk about my edits? 18:48, 9 February 2012 (UTC) reply
Talented singer didn't won the first season of The X Factor. Fails WP:MUSICBIO and really not notable who has no recording contract. ApprenticeFan work 12:34, 2 February 2012 (UTC) reply
Keep: The finalists of American Idol get an article, why can't the same be for The X Factor? -- Babar Suhail ( talk) 04:19, 6 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. — Tom Morris ( talk) 10:44, 10 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The album was only released in the United States, not entered into a chart (Billboard) or won an award (RIAA). Not have new songs, has the same songs as the album Pies Descalzos. The only active source is of the shopping site Amazon, compilation album no notoriety. Lucas S. msg 12:21, 2 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Lack of sources (only source is a dead link) also indicates a potential BLP problem, aside from notability. Xavexgoem ( talk) 15:58, 12 February 2012 (UTC) reply
Unsourced biography of a living person. Notability per WP:AUTHOR dubious. bender235 ( talk) 14:55, 25 January 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Xavexgoem ( talk) 15:59, 12 February 2012 (UTC) reply
Seems not to meet WP:GNG. Sitush ( talk) 14:19, 25 January 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. — Tom Morris ( talk) 14:04, 9 February 2012 (UTC) reply
I found nothing to show notability. This product fails WP:N. SL93 ( talk) 13:22, 25 January 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was A9, non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 19:49, 3 February 2012 (UTC) reply
Lacks substantial RS coverage in gnews and gbooks, and Allmusic never heard of it. Zero refs. Epeefleche ( talk) 22:58, 26 January 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus. with no prejudice against speedy renomination ( non-admin closure) B music ian 08:28, 9 February 2012 (UTC) reply
Relisting for AfD. No evidence of notability. Apparently from a Greek source but no Greek article is shown to exist. Unreferenced. Cloudz 679 18:27, 19 January 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus. WP:NPASR. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 19:49, 10 February 2012 (UTC) reply
Probably non-notable Indian band. Third-party references are bare URLs and all but one are dead links. If kept, needs editing to either add sources or remove detailed information not supported by sources, and to repair promotional language. Dcoetzee 11:49, 19 January 2012 (UTC) reply
Made few changes and removed material that seemed to be like self promotion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Macabreday ( talk • contribs) 08:07, 23 January 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus. with a leave for speedy renomination. ( non-admin closure) Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talk about my edits? 18:45, 9 February 2012 (UTC) reply
not part of any greater framework of articles - there is no global ITF Junior Rankings article, nor for any other regions, and why the arbitrary joining of Asia and Oceania (and not Asia and Europe, Eurasia) Mayumashu ( talk) 04:39, 26 January 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) B music ian 08:28, 9 February 2012 (UTC) reply
article fails to establish notability - article fails WP:GNG - the entire text of the article is taken from the website of the BLP subject and thusly constitues copyright violation. Amsaim ( talk) 02:03, 26 January 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. — Tom Morris ( talk) 13:59, 9 February 2012 (UTC) reply
This page is just spam - Consists entirely of external links Vrenator talk 10:28, 2 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talk about my edits? 12:48, 3 February 2012 (UTC) reply
Article shows no evidence of notability .. fails WP:FOOTYN and WP:GNG TonyStarks ( talk) 21:01, 25 January 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. Xavexgoem ( talk) 16:00, 12 February 2012 (UTC) reply
fails WP:RLN notability guidelines as he has not played an international or in a first grade (NRL) match Mattlore ( talk) 10:05, 2 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. By the way, there is an unacceptable amount of off-topic personal comments here that are utterly unrelated to the subject and hand. Please don't clog up deletion discussions with personal feuds. Beeblebrox ( talk) 01:07, 13 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The only coverage I could find of this shopping mall was a minor fire and an elderly woman being attacked, and that's not significant coverage. Till I Go Home ( talk) 09:57, 2 February 2012 (UTC) reply
(next page)
some of the events are only borderline newsworthy, but some, such as the bombing, seem more important. "aboutness" is a rather difficult thing to pin down. DGG ( talk ) 16:47, 5 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was redirect. Beeblebrox ( talk) 00:59, 13 February 2012 (UTC) reply
Contested prod. Fails WP:BIO. Only mentions are short genealogical entries, no significant coverage of who he was or what he is supposedly notable for. Only, very relative, importance lies in his relatives, which aren't extremely notable either. Fram ( talk) 09:57, 2 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 19:48, 10 February 2012 (UTC) reply
This article is about a proposed botanical garden that, from all indications, doesn't exist except as a website. No actual location for the garden is specified. Such a proposed project might still be notable if it were being written about in independent sources, but no such sources are supplied, and my own searches found absolutely nothing. The only sources in the article are the project's own website, a directory listing for the company's office address, a couple of websites for gardens in Hawaii, and a page from the Monterey Bay Aquarium website that has nothing to do with this purported botanical garden. This article was deprodded by its creator [11]; I then posted on the creator's page asking for independent sources, but none have been added. [12] Based on all this, I'd say the subject fails the notability test, and WP:CRYSTAL applies as well. Arxiloxos ( talk) 06:31, 2 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The botanical garden land is currently in agricultural production (primarily strawberries), and adding the other plants will not commence until finalization of the land transfer ownership. This is not being publicly discussed due to financial concerns. There are presently no newspaper articles about this developing project, but it is anticipated that there will soon be. In particular, Letters of Interest in the project have been obtained from government officials, and will soon be made available on the mbbg website.
While you certainly don't have the same Crystal Ball that I have, it should be evident that the promoter of this developing project is the same promoter of the project that was developed previously, and for which a Wikipedia article already exists at World Botanical Gardens. That is a good indication that the project will happen. Wikipedia Crystal ball gazing does not require that proposed projects actually be in existence before they may be written about. Rather, they require good evidence that they will likely come to fruition. The fact of the extensive webpage, land in negotiation, and a track record of success in developing botanical gardens should be sufficient evidence of the likelihood of the project. As newsmedia reports are developed in the near future, the article will be amended/updated to add those references.
Oldnoah ( talk) 18:22, 2 February 2012 (UTC)Oldnoah Note: User Oldnoah is the author of the article in question. MelanieN ( talk) 22:25, 5 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. — Tom Morris ( talk) 13:57, 9 February 2012 (UTC) reply
Lacks substantial rs coverage. Created by an SPA. Epeefleche ( talk) 06:31, 2 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. — Tom Morris ( talk) 10:38, 10 February 2012 (UTC) reply
This company exists, but I cannot find sufficent substantial independent RS coverage of it, having checked gnews and gbooks. Created by a one-edit-only-ever SPA. Epeefleche ( talk) 05:12, 2 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talk about my edits? 18:39, 9 February 2012 (UTC) reply
last AfD was no consensus but i didn't see any compelling argument for keep. this is simply a directory. unless many of the individual groups listed are notable in their own right, there is little encyclopaedic value here. LibStar ( talk) 04:24, 2 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 19:44, 10 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The article relies on primary sources to create an essay discussing sexual abuse in the diocese. However, only one case was raised, in which the alleged perpetrator never went to court. There doesn't seem to be enough to warrant the "sexual abuse scandal" title for one event, and most of the article is about the diocese's procedures for dealing with abuse allegations, which would be better covered in the diocese article. Bilby ( talk) 04:06, 2 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. — Tom Morris ( talk) 10:34, 10 February 2012 (UTC) reply
Non-notable film critic. Fails WP:CREATIVE and WP:GNG. Sources about him are not independent since he writes for xcritic and is a voting member of avn. Morbidthoughts ( talk) 03:21, 2 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was merge to List of Wild Cards characters. ( non-admin closure) Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talk about my edits? 18:24, 9 February 2012 (UTC) reply
Non-notable Pokemon thing(?) No evidence of notability. Being a Wild Card victim with powers, but relatively few mutations who once teleported the dangerous joker Ti Malice into a place he had only dreamed of doesn't automatically confer notability. GrapedApe ( talk) 03:17, 2 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. WP:EPISODE is unhelpful here, and there should probably be a discussion to come up with notability criteria for lists of articles. Notwithstanding, this article does not have any reliable sources, and therefore has been deleted. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 19:41, 10 February 2012 (UTC) reply
First of all, the sources are inadequate (one is TV.com and the other is a forum, both of which are not really considered third-party reliable sources.) There are also issues with fancruft and original research. Darth Sjones23 ( talk - contributions) 02:13, 2 February 2012 (UTC) reply
“ | Appears to be a (albeit comprehensive) directory filled with excessive detail about the episodes ( WP:CRUFT), which Wikipedia is not. There don't appear to be non-primary reliable sources for any of the information. Since there are no independent reliable sources I believe to exist for the individual episodes of the show, this list fails WP:EPISODE. | ” |
— RJaguar3, 2nd nomination |
RJaguar3 | u | t 04:18, 2 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy delete, non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 19:49, 3 February 2012 (UTC) reply
Lacks substantial RS coverage, and Allmusic never heard of it. Zero refs. Epeefleche ( talk) 23:24, 26 January 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. Sir Sputnik ( talk) 16:48, 9 February 2012 (UTC) reply
Fails WP:NFOOTBALL and WP:GNG. Only general coverage, yet to make professional debut or senior international debut. ~ Feedintm Parley 01:27, 2 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. — Tom Morris ( talk) 12:13, 9 February 2012 (UTC) reply
Fails WP:NALBUMS. Pretty much duplicates what's in Pajama Party (group). Bbb23 ( talk) 01:20, 2 February 2012 (UTC) reply