The result was delete. No evidence of notability under the criteria of WP:NBOOK. j⚛e decker talk 15:49, 7 September 2012 (UTC) reply
If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
No indication of notability. GeorgeLouis ( talk) 22:44, 23 August 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. Meets WP:N Wily D 07:59, 7 September 2012 (UTC) reply
I haven't been able to find significant coverage of Ms. Hartley in independent reliable sources. The references that are currently on her Wikipedia page certainly don't establish notability. A web search brings up lots of social networking hits, and a few local news reports. The Las Vegas Sun piece is not significant coverage, it merely mentions her in passing. There are no news hits, and I didn't even bother searching scholar, books, etc.. I am fairly certain that given the nature of her accomplishments there is nothing out there in non-internet print media that would establish notability. Fails WP:GNG, WP:PEOPLE and WP:MODEL. MisterUnit ( talk) 23:25, 30 August 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was Keep as per positive consensus and the absence of calls for deletion outside of the nominator. The article appears to pass WP:GNG standards. A non-admin closure. And Adoil Descended ( talk) 00:48, 7 September 2012 (UTC) reply
WP:NOTABILITY WP:BLP1E - Known for 1 event (releasing mink it appears). Other than this one event, there appears to be nothing in reputable sources. PeterWesco ( talk) 23:13, 30 August 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was Withdrawn per improvements. Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 04:43, 6 September 2012 (UTC) reply
Only sources are directory listings which give no biographical info whatsoever. No reliable third party coverage found. Only roles are fairly minor. Deprodded without comment. Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 23:11, 30 August 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. j⚛e decker talk 05:23, 7 September 2012 (UTC) reply
A defunct video game company that has no notability. It never released a single game, as its only developed game was unfinished when the company went out of business. The only source present in the article is to a blog, and is thus not a reliable source, and I am unable to find any other reliable sources that talk about the company in any meaningful way. The article has been unreferenced and orphaned since its creation in 2008, and I am finding no way to improve this. Rorshacma ( talk) 22:58, 30 August 2012 (UTC) Rorshacma ( talk) 22:58, 30 August 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was Speedy close, non-admin closure. Nominator has agreed to renominate separately. Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 19:54, 31 August 2012 (UTC) reply
Nominating because this was released by Legacy Records on behalf of sony music and is a collection of pre-released material. None of these albums get very much mention from independent sources because the label and artist do not recognised or endorse them.
Also nominating:
— Lil_℧niquℇ №1 [talk] 22:58, 30 August 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. No evidence of notability under GNG, AUTHOR, etc. j⚛e decker talk 05:24, 7 September 2012 (UTC) reply
This appears to be an entirely unremarkable person. There's barely even an assertion of notability here; it's practically an WP:A7 candidate, but there are a few claims of 'importance'. Regardless, I can't find any coverage of him in independent sources whatsoever. (The links in the article are broken.) Robofish ( talk) 22:43, 30 August 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was snow keep. No policy-based reason for deletion has been provided, and excellent sources have been supplied. NAC— S Marshall T/ C 00:48, 31 August 2012 (UTC) reply
Not viewed much and not edited much. Bobherry talk 21:04, 30 August 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Mark Arsten ( talk) 19:18, 6 September 2012 (UTC) reply
Per WP:NOT, with WP:CRYSTAL and WP:NOTTVGUIDE in particular. PROD removed by article creator without rationale. Dori ☾ Talk ☯ Contribs☽ 20:26, 30 August 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Mark Arsten ( talk) 19:18, 6 September 2012 (UTC) reply
Does not meet WP:Notability -- DanielKlotz ( talk · contribs) 19:51, 30 August 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Mark Arsten ( talk) 17:02, 6 September 2012 (UTC) reply
Not notable. No refs, no claim of significance other than existing. GregJackP Boomer! 18:01, 30 August 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Mark Arsten ( talk) 17:03, 6 September 2012 (UTC) reply
This is one of millions of online poets who post poetry on free websites and indulge in "vanity publishing" on lulu.com, they have no actual credits to their name beyond that.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Userdefinable ( talk • contribs) 28 August 2012
The result was delete. Mark Arsten ( talk) 16:59, 6 September 2012 (UTC) reply
Teenage footballer who has never played in a professional league, so fails WP:NFOOTY, and has not received significant coverage in reliable third-party sources, so fails WP:GNG -- ChrisTheDude ( talk) 17:01, 30 August 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Mark Arsten ( talk) 17:03, 6 September 2012 (UTC) reply
External links are hoax and/or claim no information about the person. Not a notable person. Harsh (talk) 16:22, 30 August 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy delete. WP:A7 No indication of notability. Yunshui 雲 水 10:46, 5 September 2012 (UTC) reply
No refs/sources. Not a notable media organisation. Harsh (talk) 15:57, 30 August 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. The Bushranger One ping only 17:08, 6 September 2012 (UTC) reply
Article is "biography" of a "yet to be born person" said to be born between now and 2027. This article has been deleted in the past for the same reasons. There is no article for Jesus Christ, Jr. Article is simply NN. Iconoclast.Horizon ( talk) 20:41, 29 July 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Consensus is that attribution is not an issue in this case. If it turns out to be later, the pages can be undeleted where appropriate. ItsZippy ( talk • contributions) 18:18, 7 September 2012 (UTC) reply
Looks like a draft page already merged in Dictionary of chemical formulas, so superfluous The Banner talk 14:18, 30 August 2012 (UTC) reply
Similar articles:
To my opinion, all these articles are superfluous. The Banner talk 14:24, 30 August 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy delete. Copyright violation — Malik Shabazz Talk/ Stalk 20:30, 1 September 2012 (UTC) reply
I had tagged this article under A7 but was removed by an anon. My rationale is that this article lack notabilty, fails WP:BAND Morning Sunshine ( talk) 13:52, 30 August 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Mark Arsten ( talk) 14:25, 6 September 2012 (UTC) reply
Fails WP:ATH and his team is not on the WP:FOOTBALL list. TYelliot | Talk | Contribs 13:49, 30 August 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was Keep. ( non-admin closure)— cyberpower ChatOnline 01:44, 6 September 2012 (UTC) reply
Fails WP:NF. TYelliot | Talk | Contribs 13:47, 30 August 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Mark Arsten ( talk) 19:57, 10 September 2012 (UTC) reply
The son of the President does not generate independent notability - unelected position is not notable as a mere functionary/advisor. dangerous panda 13:33, 30 August 2012 (UTC) reply
I do agree with Electriccatfish 2. Part of the problem here is that Oscar seems to solely rely on a google translation of articles from the french.contrary to your assertions, The individual does have an official position according to the decree of april 16 that's referenced in your source.That alone gives me pause. It should be noted that the sunday times article that seems to have sparked your interest [25] nowhere mentions this individual. CollinsGen12 ( talk) 15:32, 30 August 2012 (UTC) CollinsGen12 ( talk) 15:32, 30 August 2012 (UTC) reply
Here is a link [26] to a notice posted from one of the sites used as sources on the article. He proclaims in french "Nous avons clairement affiché notre appartenance à l’opposition et nous ne transigerons pour rien au monde." Translation : we have clearly shown our membership in the opposition and nothing will compromise that stance. CollinsGen12 ( talk) 16:04, 30 August 2012 (UTC) reply
@ Oscar This a BLP first and foremost, the quality of the sources is in fact a central issue along with getting it right. I have tried to follow through your "evidence" and i'm not convinced i must say (see below). This is an encyclopedia not a tabloid.
11:20, 31 August 2012 (UTC)~
@Oscar, 1. "This discussion alone has illustrated that there is notable information out there" ==> EXISTENCE IS NO PROOF OF NOTABILITY. 2. Pageview stats are a common notability fallacy.T Additionally, the notability of an event ( "deals") does not imply the notability of people who may partake in it as your thesis seems to imply here. Stretching your argument, this character appears nowhere on the only things that seem verifiable in these articles : the signed contracts.I couldn't find a single credible instance of an interview, profile of this individual in any language on any source (reputable or not). Let's face it: the ONLY REASON this is here is BECAUSE he is the son a president. — Preceding unsigned comment added by CollinsGen12 ( talk • contribs) 16:47, 31 August 2012 (UTC) reply
Edits undone. Seems intent on building an attack page in violation of BLP policies. CollinsGen12 ( talk) 15:22, 5 September 2012 (UTC) reply
YourI will just repaste here a comment to you from user JamesBWatson. It looks as though your account exists largely, if not entirely, to carry out a campaign to "expose" certain people and businesses that you disapprove of. However, Wikipedia does not exist as a platform for this kind of activity, and using it for this sort of purpose is likely to bring you into conflict with thee policy that articles should be written from a neutral point of view. Even if the criticisms you raise are valid, writing an article the main focus of which is making those criticisms is likely to give undue weight to one aspect of the subject of the article. If an editor seems to be persistently trying to edit to support a particular point of view, they may even be blocked from editing. Also, any page which seems to exist only to disparage its subject may be summarily deleted without warning, in accordance with the policy on speedy deletion. Even such articles as Adolf Hitler are not written in ways which do nothing but attack their subjects. You may find it helpful to look at the pages Wikipedia:Advocacy and Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not. JamesBWatson (talk) 12:00, 29 August 2012 (UTC) 12:20, 6 September 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by CollinsGen12 ( talk • contribs)
OscarK, This is not personal, it's about violations of standards set for BLPs: NPOV and Verifiability and Notability. I did my best to find reputable sources to back your editing without success on this particular person. That raises red flags as to how much rewriting can be done to "save your edits". Notability is an issue raised as an "original sin" argument by many on this board. Uzma Gamal raises the points that I've been trying to get across to you: writings on the net are not to be taken at face value irrespective of volume or location.Especially as they relate to people. BLP standards note that "We must get the article right. Be very firm about the use of high-quality sources." In this case, Guinea is covered by a large number of credible news organisations AFP, RFI, REUTERS, VOA, BBC, VOA, AP... I tried a search for this individual on those services, NOT A SINGLE ONE OF THESE ORGANISATIONS HAS A WORD ON HIM OR LINK HIM TO THE "CONTROVERSIES"AND THAT INCLUDE THE SUNDAY TIMES ARTICLE THAT SEEMS TO HAVE STARTED YOUR POSTINGS. This is in fact stunning as one has to believe that the son of a president would engage in the unsavory activities described by your "sources" as it ranges from Mining Corruption to Election Corruption to Environmental crimes etc...and not be picked up even a single time by these services whose credibility is not in question. This raises notability issues but more seriously it raises the issue of how credible are the sources that you are using.
CollinsGen12 ( talk) 15:54, 7 September 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Mark Arsten ( talk) 14:24, 6 September 2012 (UTC) reply
This is an unsourced article by an SPA about a non-notable martial arts system. There is nothing in the article to show this system meets the notability criteria at WP:MANOTE. Papaursa ( talk) 03:38, 23 August 2012 (UTC) reply
Delete - Not a single reliable source. Concur with Papaursa this fails WP:MANOTE. Jun Kayama 07:02, 23 August 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. The arguments for keep are reasonable but the consensus tends toward deletion. — Mr. Stradivarius ( have a chat) 07:04, 8 September 2012 (UTC) reply
This article was previously nominated for deletion back in 2010, and was "no-consensused", on the grounds of weak keep !votes from an IP and the article's creator. Given more time one would expect additional information to have become available if this person was truly notable, but that seems to have not been the case, and the concerns that led to the original nomination still stand: that while this person may well be a good person fighting for a good cause, he doesn't appear to meet the notability standards for an article. The organisation he founded may be possibly be notable, but notability is not inherited, and the only significant thing that he has done outside of the organisation is a single protest. The Bushranger One ping only 03:23, 23 August 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was Flush. Mark Arsten ( talk) 14:21, 6 September 2012 (UTC) reply
Contested prod. Although I'll be the first to admit that Wikipedia sorely needs an article entitled "Butt Funnel", notability isn't established by the references provided, and this band does not come close to meeting WP:MUSIC. -- Bongwarrior ( talk) 03:08, 23 August 2012 (UTC) reply
-- I will find more references and add them to the page. Butt Funnel was a band with quite a large following in Madison, Wisconsin. Their final show drew hundreds of people. ~~ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jkdeadite ( talk • contribs) 03:17, 24 August 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Mark Arsten ( talk) 14:19, 6 September 2012 (UTC) reply
New service ("founded and created on 22nd August 2012"), article cites no independent sources or other indications of notability. HaeB ( talk) 13:02, 30 August 2012 (UTC) reply
PLEASE NOTE THAT I ADDED A CITATION TO THE PAGE, IF MORE NEEDED, PLEASE FEEL FREE TO LET ME KNOW VIA POSTING HERE. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
120.60.47.127 (
talk) 15:58, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
reply
The result was Keep. ( non-admin closure)— cyberpower ChatOnline 01:52, 6 September 2012 (UTC) reply
Fails WP:NSPORT and the league he plays in is not found on WP:FPL TYelliot | Talk | Contribs 12:30, 30 August 2012 (UTC) reply
Keep. Appears to have represented country at international level and be a legitimate top player in Mexican Leagues. http://www.goal.com/en-india/people/guatemala/57257/jos%C3%A9-carlos-castillo/national. Kieranian2001 ( talk) 13:10, 30 August 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was Speedy Keep. No delete !votes, no rationale in the nomination for deletion. VQuakr ( talk) 07:28, 2 September 2012 (UTC) reply
TYelliot | Talk | Contribs 12:25, 30 August 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was speedily deleted per G11 by Jimfbleak ( talk · contribs). Non-admin closure. — KuyaBriBri Talk 17:07, 30 August 2012 (UTC) reply
Non-notable autobio. Makes claim of significance, so CSD not appropriate. GregJackP Boomer! 11:31, 30 August 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) — cyberpower ChatLimited Access 15:15, 7 September 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was redirect to Anubhav Sinha#Career. Mark Arsten ( talk) 14:18, 6 September 2012 (UTC) reply
No references/sources. Apparently an advertisement. Promotes another not so notable person. Harsh (talk) 10:29, 30 August 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus. ( non-admin closure) TheSpecialUser TSU 08:47, 6 September 2012 (UTC) reply
Appears to fail general notability guidelines. SarahStierch ( talk) 04:51, 16 August 2012 (UTC) reply
Could you elaborate on this, please? Would citing additional/other sources help? Umjkb ( talk) 11:50, 17 August 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was weak keep. I'm pretty close to no consensus here - the sources provided show that popular Android apps appear to be a notable topic, maybe not for an explicit ranking. But that hasn't received much discussion. Needing to be updated isn't a grounds for deletion, and the arguments so are wholly unconvincing. Basically the same is true of any list about something that continues to the present. Renaming should be considered at the page as an editorial decision. Wily D 06:53, 7 September 2012 (UTC) Since I was asked, note that WP:NOTYELLOW says we shouldn't include "Non-encyclopedic cross-categorizations"; i.e., random intersections where the intersection is of no important "List of blonde astronomers", "list of marxist chefs", etc. Note that in this case the sources (at least some) are specific to Android Apps, not apps in general, which is unsurprising as the platform an application runs on is generally relevant to that application. It isn't the case that we're doing the categorisation by platform, the sources are. Wily D 09:32, 7 September 2012 (UTC) reply
Violation of WP:NOTPROMOTION. Nathan2055 talk - contribs 01:30, 23 August 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was merge to University of Arizona. ( non-admin closure) — cyberpower ChatLimited Access 15:34, 7 September 2012 (UTC) reply
A non-profit organization run by students at the University of Arizona. While they have been a recognized club at the college for a good long time, and they certainly are a noble cause, they do not appear to pass the notability requirements for groups and organizations. I am unable to find any reliable third party sources discussing the organization, and any hits I have found are either first party (ie, the official site) or referring not to this group, but to a battle during the Civil War that has no relation. Rorshacma ( talk) 21:59, 8 August 2012 (UTC) reply
Camp Wildcat certainly has more local relevance (Tucson, AZ) than national. Over the years, the organization has been covered by local media, both newspaper and radio. I agree that this coverage is tough to find online - with the exception of that provided by the U of A student newspaper (arguably the most relevant for this organization). The radio coverage and much of the newspaper coverage since 1965 would be in archives that are not easily accessed online. Assume for a moment that Camp Wildcat was covered well by current, local, online sources (there aren't many in this small market). Would it still fail the notability requirements if there is no national coverage? Thanks. -- Kevinjscott ( talk) 13:06, 9 August 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Will userfy upon request. Mark Arsten ( talk) 14:15, 6 September 2012 (UTC) reply
This is an ongoing doctoral project by a student at Temple University. While I wish him the best of luck on his thesis, this article does not meet WP:WEB or the general notability guideline. There is some outside coverage in what appear to be personal blogs. szyslak ( t) 08:53, 30 August 2012 (UTC) reply
Hi Szyslak. No, it's a political party. It started as a thesis, and then it grew teeth. Sharp teeth. When are and when aren't blogs permitted citations?
Thanks--
Settdigger ( talk) 09:06, 30 August 2012 (UTC) reply
"If a topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, it is presumed to satisfy the inclusion criteria for a stand-alone article or stand-alone list."
I grant you, this party is real small potatoes. But it's received outside coverage.
Settdigger ( talk) 09:08, 30 August 2012 (UTC) reply
Thank you, Johnuniq for making suggestions for helpful additions and evincing a desire to scrap the entire page in the same breath. I've added some per your suggestions. Your blanket statement that it does not satisfy Wikipedia' notability guidelines is amusing -- let's talk about it. Settdigger ( talk) 15:42, 30 August 2012 (UTC) reply
Direct Congress has been featured on National Public Radio's Newsworks Tonight, in a TEDx talk, and on WHIP Student Radio, among other places. See: http://directcongress.org/news/ Direct Congress is significant because it is the first American initiative to create an online voting party that sponsors real candidates. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aet250 ( talk • contribs) 18:17, 30 August 2012 (UTC) — Aet250 ( talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. reply
The result was keep. sources has been located Wily D 06:45, 7 September 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was No consensus. Nominator indef blocked for sockpuppetry, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/LiteralKa ( non-admin closure) Tothwolf ( talk) 23:41, 5 September 2012 (UTC) reply
Completely lacks any significant coverage.
Mythpage88 (
talk) 08:28, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
reply
The result was delete. Mark Arsten ( talk) 14:07, 6 September 2012 (UTC) reply
I'm sure this community music centre did noble things but there is nothing to suggest it meets WP:ORG. coverage is very limited and lacking indepth. [57]. LibStar ( talk) 02:54, 23 August 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. Wide support for the idea that available sources far exceeded WP:GNG (also SNOW) j⚛e decker talk 02:41, 31 August 2012 (UTC) reply
Just a BBC documentary film on Pakistan, I do not see how this satisfies WP:NF or why it needs a stub article of its own. The documentary has zero academic coverage. Mar4d ( talk) 07:05, 30 August 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was G11 by Amatulic. NAC— S Marshall T/ C
Non-notable place and no sources provided. TYelliot | Talk | Contribs 06:28, 30 August 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. — Crisco 1492 ( talk) 11:31, 30 August 2012 (UTC) reply
The purpose of this article is to rank the world's ethnic groups by population. Unfortunately, the list is an orgy in original research, humorous at times but never encyclopedic. The topic itself is not without interest, but the problem is that a list of this kind could never be sourced, and would be definition always be original research. I'll list some of the main problems
1. While one can easily define nationality (by one's passport), the population of a country (by censuses) or even native language (less precise but still easy to define), one cannot define ethnicity in the same clear-cut way. While a Swede born in Sweden to two Swedish parents, four Swedish grandparents and eight Swedish great-grandparents is likely to be an ethnic Swede, what ethnicity is an American born in the US with eight great grandparents who were, say, English, German, Irish, Italian, French, Greek, Jewish and Chinese? In short, there are established, universally accepted ways to define nationality, there are no universally accepted ways to define ethnicity
2. Because of the lack of any data on ethnicity, a list like this will never be able to build on a source. This is evident in the current article, where different sources are used for different ethnicities. Such a practice is not serious, as it allows for wide measurement and interpretation differences. This makes it impossible to compile a list, as the data is not comparable
3. A quick look at the different ethnicities reveals a very uneven treatment. For some ethnicities, it seems that only those born in the country and speaking the language are counted. For other ethnicities, it's evident that even fourth or fifth generation emigrants who mostly do not speak the language are counted.
I could list more problems, but I perceive these to be the most serious. Since there is no agreed way to define ethnicity, there are no data on ethnicity around the world, no sources for the articles to build on and no chance of achieving comparable data, a list of this kind will always be original research, at least until the day when there is massive DNA testing and ethnicities defined on those tests. If that day comes, the list can be recreated. As that day is not coming in the near future, I move that the list be deleted. Jeppiz ( talk) 22:02, 22 August 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Mark Arsten ( talk) 14:03, 6 September 2012 (UTC) reply
Non-notable book. PROD was removed by creating author. Dori ☾ Talk ☯ Contribs☽ 03:16, 30 August 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. WP:SOFTDELETE Mark Arsten ( talk) 14:03, 6 September 2012 (UTC) reply
Unable to find reliable, secondary sources which provide in-depth coverage of this dub artist. As such, I don't see evidence that he reaches the general notability guideline. j⚛e decker talk 13:59, 16 August 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Mark Arsten ( talk) 14:02, 6 September 2012 (UTC) reply
I've Googled enough that there are a few sources but they don't really provide strong credible notability - the majority of content online about this organization is based on advertising. I believe it fails WP:GNG. SarahStierch ( talk) 16:29, 16 August 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Mark Arsten ( talk) 03:07, 6 September 2012 (UTC) reply
Unsourced since creation. Either so small it fails WP:ORG or possibly nonexistent (I have found no sources or mentions of this fair). Zoupan 15:11, 16 August 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Rlendog ( talk) 15:08, 6 September 2012 (UTC) reply
Non-notable song from an unreleased album, only one reliable source claims the existence of said song. Delete per WP:MUSIC and WP:N. SE KinG. User page. Talk. 18:25, 16 August 2012 (UTC) reply
Just looking at the article Lil Wayne discography, I see that the song was not mentioned there. This makes me think that it quite definitely is not a very notable song by this singer. ACEOREVIVED ( talk) 15:20, 4 September 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Mark Arsten ( talk) 03:05, 6 September 2012 (UTC) reply
no assertion of notability, advert, COI, bad fair use image, SPAM magnet for link from extractor hood article Widefox ( talk) 18:55, 16 August 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus. ( non-admin closure) TheSpecialUser TSU 08:44, 6 September 2012 (UTC) reply
I can't find any in-depth analysis of this google-built software in reliable sources, to satisfy the WP:GNG. All of the information in reliable sources appears to be non-independent (ie: published by google). Them From Space 19:28, 16 August 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was merge to Sergei Mavrodi. Further discussion is unlikely to reach a better solution. DGG ( talk ) 02:14, 7 September 2012 (UTC) reply
I'm nominating this for deletion. It's probably the worst article I've ever seen on Wikipedia. It's clearly a shill and out to sell whatever product this is supposed to be, nevermind the generally awful translation and that it's sprinkled with random emotes. Wikipedia really doesn't need this. -- 93.200.25.68 ( talk) 01:23, 30 August 2012 (UTC) reply
— SPGremlin ( talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
The result was delete. This one is borderline, but the consensus is leaning towards delete. — Mr. Stradivarius ( have a chat) 05:37, 8 September 2012 (UTC) reply
Non-notable author of non-notable books. Only one of the three references (the Goldsmith Gazette) has any kind of WP:SIGCOV, but it's a primary source. The Toronto Sun doesn't mention him at all, just a CD where he was a producer. Of his seven books, five are self-published, as is the CD. Doesn't pass WP:AUTHOR, WP:PROF, or WP:GNG. Dori ☾ Talk ☯ Contribs☽ 02:03, 30 August 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was Merged and left redirect. Article is duplicate of a higher quality and more appropriately titled article, Paul Warner (judge). — Eustress talk 14:53, 30 August 2012 (UTC) reply
Fails WP:GNG. Subject is currently a United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Utah, however, the article is outdated and does not mention the fact. However, that fact does not establish notability for the subject as Magistrate Judges are not inherently notable, nor does any of his previous positions establish notability. Nor does he have any accomplishments or cases that would establish notability. Delete. Safiel ( talk) 01:47, 30 August 2012 (UTC) reply
Not enough coverage in independent sources to support notability. Fails WP:BLP. Delete. Factchecker25 ( talk) 04:06, 30 August 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Mark Arsten ( talk) 03:03, 6 September 2012 (UTC) reply
The article almost qualifies for BLP PROD since the references provided in the article are either dead or make no mention of a Milan Jelic. His most serious claim of notability is that he played for FK Vojvodina (it's not clear that the other teams listed are fully professional) but I couldn't verify that claim. It's also noted that he was the head coach of FK Borac Novi Sad but again, it's not clear that this is a professional team and it is at best a marginal professional team playing in the Vojvodina League West which is part of the fourth tier of Serbian football. There's a complete absence of coverage in English sources online but of course most sources, if they exist, will not even be in the Latin script. Searching for "Милан Јелић" is useless because there's a much more famous Milan Jelić. However "ФК Борац" " Милан Јелић" (FK Borac + Milan Jelic) didn't turn up any obvious hits except for the fact that a football stadium is named after Dr. Milan Jelić (the other guy). A search for "ФК Војводина" " Милан Јелић" (FK Vojvodina + Milan Jelic) also comes up empty. Pichpich ( talk) 01:17, 30 August 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Mark Arsten ( talk) 03:00, 6 September 2012 (UTC) reply
Not enough verifiable information. There's just a few iTunes sources which reveal the artist had released some songs but nothing to attribute the songs to a particular album. The songs in the recorded list do not come from reliable sources, there's no confirmed release date and a search of the internet struggles to provide reliable sources for the artist even working on a new album. — Lil_℧niquℇ №1 [talk] 00:55, 30 August 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Mark Arsten ( talk) 02:59, 6 September 2012 (UTC) reply
A speedy on this as A7 (no indication of importance) & G11 (entirely promotional) was contest on the basis that there was at least one good ref for notability. Myself, I consider the two articles to be entirely based on the company's PR, as routine local coverage, and not to show anything that is actually important. I also think with no indication of financial significance in the article, and the refs reporting donations of only $15,000, the importance is so trivial that the article is essentially promotional for the brokerage. I can't see how to rewrite it because I don't think there's anything significant to write about. I think it would be better to have a community decision on this one DGG ( talk ) 00:52, 30 August 2012 (UTC) reply
{{
db-corp}}
and {{
db-spam}}
in the first place, and as I (also) don't see a claim of significance/notability.
Dori ☾
Talk ☯
Contribs☽ 00:57, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
replyThe result was delete. Mark Arsten ( talk) 02:58, 6 September 2012 (UTC) reply
Non-notable amateur athlete Orange Mike | Talk 00:14, 30 August 2012 (UTC) reply
Comment--haven't formed position yet as I skim through some hits during my customary google search . Seemed to garner modest coverage during his playing days as noted
[here],
[here], and
[here]. I'm not convinced it meets
WP:GNG. I'll continue to look to see if it meets any
WP:SPORTS stipulations.
Go Phightins! (
talk) 01:48, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
reply