The result was DELETE. postdlf ( talk) 02:48, 4 April 2011 (UTC) reply
Associate professor of physics at University of Nova Gorica since 2006. Says he has co-authored more than 400 papers, but only found 2 papers in which he was primary author. Other claim of fame is chair of the organizing committee of the International Conference on Time and Matter and the editor of the proceedings of the conference. Usually the proceedings is a collection of abstracts or short papers from people giving talks at the conference. Article was created by User:Sstanic. Bgwhite ( talk) 23:57, 28 March 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) Acather96 ( talk) 17:45, 5 April 2011 (UTC) reply
Some high school basketball coach. Does not meet WP:ATHLETE. bender235 ( talk) 23:57, 28 March 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was redirect to The God of Small Things. And protect. Sandstein 05:53, 5 April 2011 (UTC) reply
Article has been redirected to the The God of Small Things character list several times, but the creator keeps undoing it along with other constructive edits. Maybe deletion will stick. Katharineamy ( talk) 23:41, 28 March 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy keep - the nominator User:Phrasia and his sock puppet User:WisdomToothless are the only objectors. See sock report here Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Phrasia - ( non-admin closure) Off2riorob ( talk) 20:55, 29 March 2011 (UTC) reply
Unnoticeable video game character. Nothing unique. Barely popular. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Phrasia ( talk • contribs) 23:29, March 28, 2011 (UTC)
The result was DELETE. postdlf ( talk) 02:49, 4 April 2011 (UTC) reply
No indication of importance. I can find no other such articles on Wikipedia. Provides no references. Appears to be completely WP:OR. OlYeller Talktome 23:22, 28 March 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman ( talk) 00:59, 5 April 2011 (UTC) reply
Assertion of notability insufficient under general guidelines WP:N and does not seem to meet the specific criteria in WP:SCH. Prod was removed by IP without comment. Onthegogo ( talk) 22:56, 28 March 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. SNOW: No significant probability this will close delete at this point. joe decker talk to me 00:21, 3 April 2011 (UTC) reply
The subject of this article does not appear to meet the general notability guideline or the WP:ACADEMIC guideline for scientists, researchers, philosophers and other scholars. Prod was removed by IP without comment. Onthegogo ( talk) 22:50, 28 March 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman ( talk) 01:00, 5 April 2011 (UTC) reply
Promotion by TheWorld2011 ( talk · contribs). Irrelevant organisation, does not meet WP:NGO (they're nonexistent in the media). bender235 ( talk) 22:19, 28 March 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman ( talk) 01:00, 5 April 2011 (UTC) reply
Contested PROD. My PROD rationale was: "I see nothing to substantiate any of this stuff in either the references or Google. It is just a heap of non-notable and unverifiable speculation. The BBC "reference" isn't even remotely relevant.", to which I would add that it is original research. The author has contested the PROD and posted his reasons on the talk page. DanielRigal ( talk) 22:01, 28 March 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. No arguments for deletion aside from the nominator. Ron Ritzman ( talk) 01:02, 5 April 2011 (UTC) reply
Unsure about notability (does WP:NONPROFIT apply?), sources are shaky (only few mention the project at all). bender235 ( talk) 21:59, 28 March 2011 (UTC) reply
Both are valid groups. Project No One Leaves is independent from the Harvard Legal Aid Bureau, as it involves chapters throughout Boston and the country. It was founded by Bureau members, however, and refers many cases to the Bureau. — Saalevine ( talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. The preceding unsigned comment was added at 16:29, 29 March 2011 (UTC). reply
Keep This is a student run volunteer group that has had success at finding ways to keep "at risk" homeowners in their homes. — Lissyu ( talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. The preceding unsigned comment was added at 01:54, 31 March 2011 (UTC). reply
The result was delete. In most cases userfication is an option in cases like this but not IMHO for a 13 year old. Ron Ritzman ( talk) 01:06, 5 April 2011 (UTC) reply
Self-promotional autobiography by 13-year old Sparkyomega ( talk · contribs). No notability per WP:CREATIVE. I suggest a move to his user namespace. bender235 ( talk) 21:48, 28 March 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman ( talk) 01:07, 5 April 2011 (UTC) reply
Non-notable cricketer: fails WP:ATH and WP:CRIN Johnlp ( talk) 21:36, 28 March 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete the whole shebang. Ron Ritzman ( talk) 01:08, 5 April 2011 (UTC) reply
Non-notable software product. No assertion of notability and no sources. Previous AfD closed as no-consensus: received only two responses (one from an apparent single-purpose account): Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ID Flow KFP ( contact | edits) 21:24, 28 March 2011 (UTC) reply
I am also nominating the following related pages because they are similar pages for the same company's other products. The parent article Jolly Technologies was speedy deleted per WP:CSD#A7, but since A7 doesn't apply to products... (prod not possible since one was previously challenged):
The result was DELETE. postdlf ( talk) 02:50, 4 April 2011 (UTC) reply
Alleged to be a copy of Demon Hunter in 2009. Still looks like a copy of Demon Hunter. I thought it better to bring it here where people who know Christian music may be able to say if Far and Away do exist, or are just a figment of the imagination of a blocked sockpuppet. Peridon ( talk) 21:16, 28 March 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. Consensus appears to be in favor of keeping the article. ( non-admin closure) Alpha Quadrant talk 14:18, 4 April 2011 (UTC) reply
With an Alexa Traffic Rank of 224,938 it is fair to say that this website does not meet WP:WEB. bender235 ( talk) 20:43, 28 March 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. NW ( Talk) 19:08, 4 April 2011 (UTC) reply
This article is biography of a living person about a rapper that lacks coverage in reliable sources to establish notability. The article was created by Dented1 ( talk · contribs) which may indicate some conflict of interest as this artist's label is Dented Records. He has put out one album, and has worked with many other artists, but none of this satisy the particulars of WP:MUSICBIO. Whpq ( talk) 20:19, 28 March 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was redirect to B roads in Zone 4 of the Great Britain numbering scheme. Jujutacular talk 03:59, 6 April 2011 (UTC) reply
NOTE: Page is now at B4362, the correct name (see below), with the redirect marked for speedy deletion PamD ( talk) 17:15, 29 March 2011 (UTC) reply
Per Wikipedia_talk:Notability#Roads. Jay Σεβαστός discuss 19:52, 28 March 2011 (UTC) reply
Well perhaps someone could mabye move the page so it has a more appropiate title? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Axelstevo ( talk • contribs) 15:38, 29 March 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. Feezo (send a signal | watch the sky) 02:32, 5 April 2011 (UTC) reply
Declined PROD, the rationale behind which was "Very small part of household paraphernalia that in no way qualifies for an encyclopedia article. Can't believe there's no speedy criteria that this fits" Dylanfromthenorth ( talk) 19:45, 28 March 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was DELETE. postdlf ( talk) 03:26, 3 April 2011 (UTC) reply
The article is about a painting by a painter, whose notability is also questionable, a preliminary research only point to blog of semi-professional painters or photographers, also tried to find any coverage by any newspaper or magazine, even a mention, could not find anything related to this painting. If the painting has a background, influence or history it should be mentioned with reliability, because I couldn't also find anything about it. Eduemoni ↑talk↓ 19:39, 28 March 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman ( talk) 01:10, 5 April 2011 (UTC) reply
Non-notable comics artist. She has received, as far as I can tell, precisely zero coverage in reliable sources. There is a page on Comic Book Database here [10], but that isn't sufficient for notability. Robofish ( talk) 23:55, 13 March 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Redirection does not strike me as useful, but can always be done editorially. Sandstein 05:55, 5 April 2011 (UTC) reply
I PRODed this which was removed by an IP. Although the IP made good effort to add sources, they are all niche publications, and all not terribly prominent in mention (except for one source). Doesn't meet GNG. NativeForeigner Talk/ Contribs 22:36, 14 March 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was redirect to Personera. Sandstein 05:57, 5 April 2011 (UTC) reply
previously closed by a non-admin when it may have been appropriate to relist a 2nd time, blatantly fails WP:BIO. the sources are mostly unreliable. hardly any coverage [11] previous keep argument relied on poor WP:GOOGLEHITS reasoning. LibStar ( talk) 01:14, 14 March 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was DELETE. postdlf ( talk) 22:40, 2 April 2011 (UTC) reply
Self-promotional autobiography by Cartoonmation ( talk · contribs). No notability per WP:CREATIVE. I suggest a move to his user namespace. bender235 ( talk) 17:44, 28 March 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was DELETE. postdlf ( talk) 22:42, 2 April 2011 (UTC) reply
Violates WP:BLP1E Shearonink ( talk) 17:12, 28 March 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was redirect to List of airports in Ireland. ( non-admin closure) Alpha Quadrant talk 14:12, 4 April 2011 (UTC) reply
Duplicate of the much better List of airports in Ireland. There are two redlinked ones from here that are not included in List of airports in Ireland, Dowth Hall Co. Louth and Knocksedan Heliport Co. Dublin, but those can be added if they can be sourced. The rest are all included already. -- Boing! said Zebedee ( talk) 16:46, 28 March 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy delete after being moved to Jibawi, per WP:CSD#G7, by Athaenara ( talk · contribs). — David Eppstein ( talk) 20:08, 3 April 2011 (UTC) reply
Self-promotional autobiography by Abdjibawi ( talk · contribs). No notability per WP:ACADEMIC. I suggest a move to his user namespace. bender235 ( talk) 15:53, 28 March 2011 (UTC) reply
Mentioned here and here in independent sources. If its a keep it is a very weak one. Although a self-promo which should be nuked, the book he wrote published by Oxford Press and his position in the British Arab Medical Association is notable.... But lack of third party sources about him beyond Oxford and the fact it is a self-promo would lean towards Weak delete.♦ Dr. Blofeld 21:03, 28 March 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was DELETE. postdlf ( talk) 02:52, 4 April 2011 (UTC) reply
This article is about a sports training academy/company that has no significant coverage in reliable sources. The sole reference in the article is a press release, and there is no other coverage that I am able to find to establish notability. Note that there is a related AFD at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Benjamin Daniel Summers. Whpq ( talk) 15:35, 28 March 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman ( talk) 01:11, 5 April 2011 (UTC) reply
Not notable footballer, fails WP:NFOOTY. Oleola ( talk) 14:52, 28 March 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy keep per WP:SNOW. — David Eppstein ( talk) 19:59, 29 March 2011 (UTC) reply
Person of little importance or relevance to Wikipedia's scope Ojibberish ( talk) 14:45, 28 March 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman ( talk) 01:12, 5 April 2011 (UTC) reply
Not notable footballer, fails WP:NFOOTY. Oleola ( talk) 14:38, 28 March 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. Well argued and reasoned discussion resulting in a rough consensus that there is just enough third party coverage to justify one of those "occasional exceptions" to WP:NFF.-- Kubigula ( talk) 22:20, 10 April 2011 (UTC) reply
Fails WP:NFF, which states "Films that have not been confirmed by reliable sources to have commenced principal photography should not have their own articles, as budget issues, scripting issues and casting issues can interfere with a project well ahead of its intended filming date. The assumption should also not be made that because a film is likely to be a high-profile release it will be immune to setbacks — there is no "sure thing" production." It continues "Until the start of principal photography, information on the film might be included in articles about its subject material, if available." I cannot see, at this stage, given that all the information was copied verbatim from Superman in film#2012 reboot and sits happily on that page, any reason why this article would justify an exception to this guideline. -- Rob Sinden ( talk) 13:14, 28 March 2011 (UTC) reply
<s>
and </s>
after the *
, as in "▪ Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. — Rob Sinden ( talk) 08:07, 29 March 2011 (UTC) reply
Just thought I update you that the once was userspace draft is now a article incubator (even though the favor seems to be a keep anyways) The incubator is done in film style so I suppose it can be used when it's a film. Jhenderson 777 15:22, 31 March 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman ( talk) 01:12, 5 April 2011 (UTC) reply
Non-notable - cannot find anything outside blogs, fora and Ionic's own web site - i.e. significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. The references in the article don't actually mention the Stratus. The Shaspa Bridge is described in the article's reference to it [26] as "a Java based application", i.e. software. Jll ( talk) 12:15, 28 March 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy delete. WP:CSD#G3 blatant hoax. "known to have inspired the famous Austin-Morris car company in its naming" is enough to get this speedied before April1. JohnCD ( talk) 17:13, 31 March 2011 (UTC) reply
WP:HOAX: unreferenced, no trace of the supposed scholar online. Article claims that subject "inspired the famous Austin-Morris car company in its naming": Morris Motor Company was founded by a William Morris, and the company was later joined with the Austin Motor Company to form BMC. Shire Reeve ( talk) 11:30, 28 March 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was DELETE. postdlf ( talk) 23:04, 2 April 2011 (UTC) reply
Non-notable picture recolor of sonic characters. Possibly neologism, no indication of independent third-party sources, first section is an instruction, second POVy. ♫Greatorangepumpkin♫ T 11:08, 28 March 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was speedily deleted (G11) by Deb. Non-admin closing Deor ( talk) 15:22, 2 April 2011 (UTC) reply
Advert for a company that is not notable. No significant linkage to the page either. Heywoodg 08:42, 28 March 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was DELETE. postdlf ( talk) 02:55, 4 April 2011 (UTC) reply
Football player who does not meet notability criteria as outlined at WP:NFOOTBALL and does not have enough coverage to warrant inclusion under WP:GNG. NFOOTBALL requires a player to have actually played in a fully professional league and both soccerbase and BBC show he has not played. Conference leagues are not fully professional. Previously deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Danzelle St Louis-Hamilton in 2009 and again at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Danzelle St Louis-Hamilton (2nd nomination) G5'd, but this was not created by banned user and probably expanded from 2009 version Club Oranje T 08:10, 28 March 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy keep. Withdrawn by nominator, no delete !votes present. ( non-admin closure) Pgallert ( talk) 13:46, 28 March 2011 (UTC) reply
Also these:
A series of articles about albums by Canadian musician
Jeff Healey (1966 - 2008). These articles contain track listings and little else. All of these articles fail
WP:NALBUMS. These albums did not chart and were not reviewed in multiple reliable sources. Wikipedia is not the
Allmusic Guide. We should not have articles on albums that only contain track listings.
LK (
talk)
05:35, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
reply
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman ( talk) 01:13, 5 April 2011 (UTC) reply
This is just a proposal for a new state flag for Minnesota, which was apparently created 22 years ago but has not been adopted by the state. The page is sourced only to the flag designers' own website at Tripod.com and to another site which says that the current Flag of Minnesota was poorly rated, but doesn't mention this new design. The only relevant source I have found on my own says that efforts "to replace [the current flag] with a newer, blockier “North Star Flag” have been unsuccessful". I recommend that this page be deleted. Metropolitan90 (talk) 05:29, 28 March 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was DELETE. postdlf ( talk) 23:05, 2 April 2011 (UTC) reply
A user's design for a new flag for Montana is a non-notable subject. Step hen 04:48, 28 March 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Favonian ( talk) 09:56, 4 April 2011 (UTC) reply
The subject of this autobiographical article does not appear to meet WP:BIO. VQuakr ( talk) 04:34, 28 March 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Sandstein 05:56, 5 April 2011 (UTC) reply
Fails Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies). There are zero independent sources that have significant coverage of Moto Roma, or Moto-roma. Trivial and incidental coverage, while insufficient for WP:GNG, is also almost nonexistent. A UK importer briefly mentions that Moto-roma is a brand Zongshen motorcycles are sold under, but there is no independent evidence that this is true. Moto Roma is also the name of an Italian motorcycle dealership, but they sell various Japanese and European brands, not Zongshen. See also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Moto Roma Virage. Dbratland ( talk) 04:11, 28 March 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman ( talk) 01:14, 5 April 2011 (UTC) reply
Non-notable theory. It has only been referenced by the thoery's creator in one paper that was published in a non-peer reviewed book. Only other citation offered is to an article that predates the theory, and so cannot be used to establish notability of the theory. No external references to the theory. Previously prodded, prod removed by anonymous IP that wrote the bulk of the article. LK ( talk) 03:58, 28 March 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman ( talk) 01:14, 5 April 2011 (UTC) reply
Does not appear to be a notable term, and in fact appears to be spam by Jonathon Wright ( talk · contribs). OSborn arf contribs. 03:17, 28 March 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman ( talk) 01:15, 5 April 2011 (UTC) reply
fails WP:BIO. some of the sources are simply his own website. 2 gnews hits [29]. LibStar ( talk) 03:15, 28 March 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Consensus is that there is not yet anything useful to say about this future election. Sandstein 05:50, 5 April 2011 (UTC) reply
Customarily an election article is not created until the
current election is completed, which is May 2.
WP:CRYSTAL states that "if preparation for the event is not already in progress, speculation about it must be well documented". The page only contains one documentation (Vancouver Sun), which is for the date. doesn't contain any third party sources.
117Avenue (
talk)
02:59, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
reply
117Avenue : please do not delete the link to this article from Canadian federal election, 2011 again until the discussion for deleting the article, which you yourself have set in motion here, has run its proper course. This article, while it may or may not qualify for deletion, is clearly not a candidate for speedy deletion, and so good faith requires that the links remain active until the process is completed. Thank you. Dash77 ( talk) 17:46, 28 March 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy keep (criterion 1). Malia Ann Obama to stay redirect per consensus on Talk:Family of Barack Obama. Stickee (talk) 06:47, 28 March 2011 (UTC) reply
Someone just blanked out an article. I don't know all the legalese of how to do a deletion so forgive me and don't try to make excuses.
Bottom line: there was a good article on Malia Ann Obama. I saw on the talk page that it was a keep as was Patrick Kennedy. However, the person that doesn't want the Obama article blanked it out so I am doing them a favor by starting the legal process to decide.
Both Kennedy and Obama are minors and children of a president. Kennedy is more obscure since he died after birth. Obama has many news articles about her, some focusing on her and not Barack Obama. Whatever we do, we should be consistent.
NOTE: THE SECOND DELETION DEBATE FOR THIS ARTICLE RESULTED IN A NON_ADMIN SPEEDY KEEP. Should this be done again? I don't know.
Kewlarticle ( talk) 02:59, 28 March 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. Consensus appears to be in favor of keeping the article and adding sources. ( non-admin closure) Alpha Quadrant talk 14:06, 4 April 2011 (UTC) reply
Declined prod in good faith. But lacking significant coverage in reliable third party sources. Fails the general notability guideline and verifiability policy on reliable sources. There's one quote from the creator in here that barely mentions this fictional location, which is far from enough to meet WP:NOT#PLOT. Shooterwalker ( talk) 02:37, 28 March 2011 (UTC) reply
This AfD is redundant. A BLPPROD still applies, and if not sourced reliably this article will be deleted in just under two days. If by some miracle a reliable source is found, please reopen this. BLPPROD is designed to avoid unnecessary debates like this one. Fences& Windows 23:43, 4 April 2011 (UTC) reply
This article I originally brought to a BLP Prod. The author appears to have attempted to remove that template with out adding any biographical sources. This article fails on multiple levels none of the least WP:BLPPROD. But also the only other mention that I can find under a couple of different searches is a youtube video. As such this article fail WP:GNG. And it also makes comment to a soccer team, not sure what level they play at but most likely also fails WP:NFOOTY. Enfcer ( talk) 02:25, 28 March 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman ( talk) 01:15, 5 April 2011 (UTC) reply
No reliable secondary sources. A google search doesn't reveal any reliable secondary sources considering their suposibly producing for major artists. STATic message me! 19:30, 13 March 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. No arguments for deletion aside from the nominator. Ron Ritzman ( talk) 00:16, 4 April 2011 (UTC) reply
Appears to fail WP:CORP. Could turn up no reliable sources for Camp Farwell to establish notability, doing some deep Web searching as well as searching on Highbeam Research. SchuminWeb ( Talk) 03:11, 13 March 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was redirect to Action Masters. Redirecting per WP:NSUPER. Consider this a no consensus close. Ron Ritzman ( talk) 00:20, 4 April 2011 (UTC) reply
Treadshot has poor sources to support this questionable article. Dwanyewest ( talk) 02:52, 13 March 2011 (UTC) reply
'how 'bout just improving the sources then!! 173.161.254.162 ( talk) 08:09, 13 March 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy delete. The only substantive authors have requested deletion of the pages. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 19:41, 28 March 2011 (UTC) reply
Verifiability, no original research: The seven Wikipedia pages devoted exclusively to the “Wilpower Volcano Chain” and the alleged volcano “Terry” should be deleted, and all references to these alleged volcanoes in other pages should be removed from Wikipedia due to lack of external references about the existence of these volcanoes, lack of geological evidence that these features are volcanoes, geological evidence that these features are unlikely to be volcanoes, and disregard of geographic naming conventions. Bc1234 ( talk) 01:22, 28 March 2011 (UTC) reply
This nomination also includes the following related pages:
Bc1234 ( talk) 02:05, 28 March 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was DELETE. postdlf ( talk) 23:11, 2 April 2011 (UTC) reply
i have removed any links too. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Carlos853333 ( talk • contribs) 04:34, 28 March 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman ( talk) 00:22, 4 April 2011 (UTC) reply
Does not pass WP:N Seems to have been created along with an article about Kosher.com and Jamie Geller as part of a promotional run. I know that this alone does not force the AfD but I don't see significant coverage as per WP:anybio. Joe407 ( talk) 08:56, 20 March 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was redirect to List of Sydney Swans players. Ron Ritzman ( talk) 00:24, 4 April 2011 (UTC) reply
Delisted by his club after having failed to play a senior AFL match in his career, so doesn't meet the Australian rules football criteria of the sports notability guideline. Also I don't think he has received significant coverage in reliable, independent sources, so doesn't pass the general notability guideline. Jenks24 ( talk) 09:20, 20 March 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman ( talk) 01:15, 5 April 2011 (UTC) reply
No significant secondary source coverage. Nothing but a few unsubstantiated claims. Jay Σεβαστός discuss 11:02, 20 March 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was Closed because article has been speedy deleted under A9. Peridon ( talk) 11:48, 4 April 2011 (UTC) reply
Co-nomination as a recording of a non-notable band. I have sent the band - Circle The Sky (Band) - to AfD also. Pol430 talk to me 13:52, 20 March 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete per consensus and per possible BLP issues. Ron Ritzman ( talk) 00:25, 4 April 2011 (UTC) reply
Not notable enough. Has no references to an external site whatsoever. Mobile Snail 01:00, 28 March 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman ( talk) 00:26, 4 April 2011 (UTC) reply
Fails WP:N jsfouche ☽☾ Talk 17:35, 20 March 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman ( talk) 00:27, 4 April 2011 (UTC) reply
appears to fail WP:NFOOTBALL Mayumashu ( talk) 00:38, 28 March 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy delete. this type of shit doesn't merit the oxygen of publicity. per WP:SNOW Scott Mac 17:24, 28 March 2011 (UTC) reply
Un-noteworthy Gareth53 ( talk) 00:24, 28 March 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman ( talk) 00:28, 4 April 2011 (UTC) reply
Non-notable author lacking GHits and GNews of substance. Fails WP:BIO and WP:CREATIVE. ttonyb ( talk) 00:08, 28 March 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was speedily deleted (G7) by Boing! said Zebedee. Non-admin closure. Deor ( talk) 15:29, 2 April 2011 (UTC) reply
Non-notable robotics team. None of the references appear to mention this specific team, just the competition and top-placing teams. VQuakr ( talk) 00:04, 28 March 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman ( talk) 00:29, 4 April 2011 (UTC) reply
Doesn't meet WP:GNG, WP:ENTERTAINER, or WP:ATHLETE. He hasn't worked in a notable promotion, and just being on a reality show isn't enough to establish notability. Nikki♥ 311 01:09, 14 March 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Feezo (send a signal | watch the sky) 02:34, 5 April 2011 (UTC) reply
Notability not asserted. Splinter group of United Church of God. SarekOfVulcan ( talk) 13:45, 21 March 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was redirect to Girlicious. Also, since this BLP is long and has only one reliable source, I'm nuking the history. Ron Ritzman ( talk) 00:33, 4 April 2011 (UTC) reply
Not a notable member outside Girlicious. Obviously there's gonna be "sufficient coverage", but there is no notable solo activity outside of the group established in the article as of now. See WP:BAND. Member was a part of another group, however that group was not notable which means notability is still not established. Fixer23 ( talk) 00:18, 21 March 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was redirect to Girlicious. Lacks reliable sources so history goes too. No sourced info to merge Ron Ritzman ( talk) 00:36, 4 April 2011 (UTC) reply
Not a notable member outside Girlicious. Obviously there's gonna be "sufficient coverage", but there is no notable solo activity outside of the group established in the article as of now. See WP:BAND. Fixer23 ( talk) 00:17, 21 March 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was redirect to Girlicious. ( non-admin closure) Alpha Quadrant talk 14:01, 4 April 2011 (UTC) reply
Not a notable member outside Girlicious. Obviously there's gonna be "sufficient coverage", but there is no notable solo activity outside of the group established in the article as of now. See WP:BAND. Fixer23 ( talk) 00:20, 21 March 2011 (UTC) reply
While that may be true, she is just as notable as Cyia Batten or Carmit Bachar. She is currently working on a solo album which may make her worth mentioning as well. ( talk) 22 March 2011
The result was redirect to Girlicious. Also deleting history due to lack of reliable sources per WP:BLP. Ron Ritzman ( talk) 00:40, 4 April 2011 (UTC) reply
Not a notable member outside Girlicious. Obviously there's gonna be "sufficient coverage", but there is no notable solo activity outside of the group established in the article as of now. See WP:BAND. Unless anyone considers being one of many dancer featured in a unnotable workout dvd notable activity. Fixer23 ( talk) 00:20, 21 March 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was merge to Baker & Daniels. Ron Ritzman ( talk) 00:41, 4 April 2011 (UTC) reply
no indication of how this company is notable or how it might meet WP:CORP. Lacks significant coverage in 3rd party sources. Google news is showing some press releases and hits on quotes from employees in various articles but nothing about the company itself. RadioFan ( talk) 19:32, 21 March 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete . Marasmusine ( talk) 07:19, 4 April 2011 (UTC) reply
Not announced as a future Video Game Muur ( talk) 18:14, 28 March 2011 (UTC) reply