The result was delete. PhantomSteve/ talk| contribs\ 23:13, 10 August 2011 (UTC) reply
Fail to be convinced that this is 1. Notable. 2. Accurate. 3. Not WP:OR. Also note the mini project discussion. Vegaswikian ( talk) 23:09, 3 August 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus. Sandstein 18:02, 11 August 2011 (UTC) reply
Just one wikilink so this page is not needed. Xajaso ( talk) 21:40, 3 August 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was Keep. Consensus leans towards notability - in particular but no solely I point out that the win at the Open Canada Cup, on which the reliable sources point as notable that an amateur team beat professional teams to win it - a claim made in the article and the discussion. As a note, the operative notability here is WP:GNG, a guideline that reflects project-wide consensus, not WP:FOOTYN, a Wikiproject essay meant to provide a roadmap to project participants but not subject to project-wide consensus. -- Cerejota ( talk) 06:27, 12 August 2011 (UTC) reply
Non-notable amateur football club, does not pass WP:Footy TonyStarks ( talk) 04:12, 25 July 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. PhantomSteve/ talk| contribs\ 23:15, 10 August 2011 (UTC) reply
Claims to notability unworthy of inclusion. Page likely created by person themselves or someone with conflict of interest. Wreaks of self-promotion. Jason Quinn ( talk) 21:32, 3 August 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Courcelles 00:04, 11 August 2011 (UTC) reply
Extended advertisement for a food vending stand (?) in Midtown Manhattan. Article is almost entirely sourced to a website for the stand. Nominated for deletion years ago when the article's name was "Chicken and Rice" (see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chicken and Rice); result was "delete" but article was re-created under current name. Insufficient multiple nontrivial coverage in sources unconnected to subject matter. ScottyBerg ( talk) 21:30, 3 August 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was Procedural close. Closing this discussion as all the relevant articles have been deleted as CSD G7 Big Dom 09:38, 5 August 2011 (UTC) reply
PROD contested by article creator. Collecting data and compiling it into a new format violates WP:OR, WP:NOTSTATS, and to a lesser extent WP:LISTCRUFT. Giant Snowman 21:21, 3 August 2011 (UTC) reply
Delete Fails on all counts mentioned, and they're not even meaningful stats. Article(s) do not in any way explain why these stats are notable either. Bretonbanquet ( talk) 21:36, 3 August 2011 (UTC) reply
Question - if you follow that particular line of logic, are you therefore going to call for the deletion of all 'All-Time' pages? Could you also please advise what sort of statistic would be classed as 'meaningful'? And calling the Conference, Southern League, Northern Premier League and Isthmian League 'random' is somewhat disengenuous, escpeially when two of the competitions have existed for over 100 years and one of them (the Southern) effectively created an entire Division of the Football League Geordiewomble 21:41, 3 August 2011 (UTC).
That would be a shame - are you going to push for ALL 'All-Time' tables to be likewise deleted? Just so I know to stop work on my League of Ireland pages.... Geordiewomble 21:48, 3 August 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Geordiewomble ( talk • contribs)
If that is the will, so be it - give me 10 minutes, they'll be gone. Just to confirm, you'd be looking to delete ALL 'all-time' lists? Would that then extend to non-Football, indeed non-Sport lists? I'm asking this as a positive enquiry, not a criticism Geordiewomble 08:58, 4 August 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Geordiewomble ( talk • contribs)
Will this be deleted too ? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/All-time_FA_Premier_League_table — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.177.11.232 ( talk) 12:00, 4 August 2011 (UTC) reply
All my pages have been cleared! Now, to go back to my first love - buses; are there any other Counties I can create Route Lists for? Geordiewomble 21:07, 4 August 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Geordiewomble ( talk • contribs)
The result was delete. Courcelles 00:05, 11 August 2011 (UTC) reply
Short stub with unclear notability. Ephemeral project. No independent sources about this project. During last three years there was no attempt to improve this stub. Beagel ( talk) 21:19, 3 August 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Courcelles 00:05, 11 August 2011 (UTC) reply
An article on the same person was deleted in 2006 ( Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Louis Carter), the subject has published further works since then but the secondary coverage is still lacking. The sources consist of an interview from a blog, websites of organisations he is affiliated with, and his own books; several sources cited (5, 7-10, 17-19) have no mention of the subject. I haven't been able to find further coverage which would establish meeting WP:BIO or bring the sourcing up to standard. January ( talk) 21:11, 3 August 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was merge to Dove_Campaign_for_Real_Beauty . Black Kite (t) (c) 00:13, 11 August 2011 (UTC) reply
Non-notable and unreferenced article about an advertising campaign. The article's central claim that 'Dove Beauties is a colloquial phrase' seems to be unfounded. I suggest deletion, but at the very least it should be merged with Dove_Campaign_for_Real_Beauty - JRheic ( talk) 20:45, 3 August 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Courcelles 00:05, 11 August 2011 (UTC) reply
Retired minor league baseball player who fails to meet WP:GNG or WP:BASE/N. – Muboshgu ( talk) 20:28, 3 August 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was keep, nomination withdrawn (non-admin closure). As much as I thought before that two obscure things didn't need disambiguation, I have been convinced. Interchangeable| talk to me| what I've changed 16:01, 8 August 2011 (UTC) reply
Readers are unlikely to confuse a European non-profit organization with measures against countermeasures in electricity. Interchangable ( talk) 20:28, 19 July 2011 (UTC) reply
Sandstein 06:31, 3 August 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Courcelles 00:07, 11 August 2011 (UTC) reply
"Eating design" appears to be one person's (Marije Vogelzang, to be precise) term for her work, intended to distinguish her work from mere "cooking" or "food styling". All references in the article are to Vogelzang's own publications or to publications about her. The term does not appear to have gained any wider usage. WikiDan61 ChatMe! ReadMe!! 20:10, 3 August 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Courcelles 00:07, 11 August 2011 (UTC) reply
Stub with unsure notability. Beagel ( talk) 19:44, 3 August 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was merge to Rock Springs massacre. Black Kite (t) (c) 00:19, 11 August 2011 (UTC) reply
Per WP:NOT#Wikipedia_is_not_a_directory and WP:MEMORIAL. Having a separate list for this adds nothing to the topic. OhNoitsJamie Talk 19:41, 3 August 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was redirect to Fuel cell#Types of fuel cell. Sandstein 18:16, 11 August 2011 (UTC) reply
Stub with unclear notability. This page should probably be a redirect to Fuel cell. Beagel ( talk) 19:32, 3 August 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was redirect to Flag of Cambodia. Any merging can occur from the history. Sandstein 18:18, 11 August 2011 (UTC) reply
There is not enough text about this flag, or any sources, to support a standalone article. This information is already present in the parent article Flag of Cambodia. Merge any information that is present and delete. User:Zscout370 (Return Fire) 19:01, 3 August 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Courcelles 00:07, 11 August 2011 (UTC) reply
No evidence of notability per WP:CORP. Kelly hi! 18:48, 3 August 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete per consensus and per CSD G4. More or less the same article and the original actually had sources. Ron Ritzman ( talk) 00:39, 10 August 2011 (UTC) reply
Run-of-the-mill software with no evidence of notability. References provided are not reliable sources, but rather appear to be mere directory listings (i.e. "I have this new software for you to buy/download") or a blog (which, from the content of the text, appears to have been a solicited review). WikiDan61 ChatMe! ReadMe!! 18:48, 3 August 2011 (UTC) reply
How can you say that workawesome and unixmen are not reliable?!!! can you please prove that before you delete this article? I can probably list at least 10 (project management) softwares on wikipedia that are true Run-of-mill with commercial language and that were listed for delete and are still hanging there. I just wonder how they do that? I am gonna quit arguing as I feel like your decision is made anyway. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cupidon92 ( talk • contribs) 18:59, 3 August 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Courcelles 00:08, 11 August 2011 (UTC) reply
WP:N -- Unable to find reliable, secondary sources providing in-depth coverage of this author to evidence his notability under WP:GNG or WP:AUTHOR. The commonality of the three names the author claims he uses does complicate searching of course, additional sources welcomed, as always. joe decker talk to me 17:08, 3 August 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Courcelles 00:08, 11 August 2011 (UTC) reply
Lacks external sourcing. The typical
WP:BEFORE checks through numerous search engines turned up no usable sources for the article, which means it fails
our policy on verifiability, and possibly
the general notability guideline. Prior sourcing for the article was provided through links to recorded show audio through sites such as MegaUpload, which aside from
self-publishing concerns, were copyright violations and could not be used.
elektrik
SHOOS (
talk)
17:04, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
reply
The result was speedy close; wrong forum. MfD already opened: Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Article Incubator/Peter MacDonald (computer programmer). Non-admin closure. — KuyaBriBri Talk 17:01, 3 August 2011 (UTC) reply
This page has not been touched in four months, it is still way too short and not got enough sources. It should now be considered to be erased. Also this biggest contributions cam from user: Pcmacdon I am not 100% certain but from the username could this person be associated with the subject of the article. Either way its been 4 months and still does not meat a decent standard Ruth-2013 ( talk) 15:18, 3 August 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was merge to Michael Landy. Courcelles 00:09, 11 August 2011 (UTC) reply
Not notable. Herp Derp ( talk) 14:56, 3 August 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Aaron Brenneman ( talk) 16:18, 13 August 2011 (UTC) reply
Article is not encyclopedic, rather speculation on who the "next great player" will be for Australia's cricket team. Article may be better suited to be a section on the Shane Warne page, rather than it's own page. Wildthing61476 ( talk) 14:10, 3 August 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was redirect to List of My Little Pony characters#Rainbow Dash. Sandstein 18:31, 11 August 2011 (UTC) reply
As much as I hate having to nominate myself for deletion, I can easily be merged into the characters list already available. Rainbow Dash !xmcuvg2MH 14:09, 3 August 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was nomination withdrawn. Non-admin closure. Elkman (Elkspeak) 15:25, 4 August 2011 (UTC) reply
Does not adequately show notability. Current "claim" to notability is "One of the finest known portraits by Sir Thomas Lawrence ... is located in its drawing room". Crisco 1492 ( talk) 13:59, 3 August 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Courcelles 00:10, 11 August 2011 (UTC) reply
No indication of notability per WP:GNG; borderline WP:SPAM; speedied 3 times as PDF OCR, deleted on expired prod once under this uncapitalised spelling. No significant coverage online from WP:Reliable sources; sole WP:Secondary source is a review on Softpedia, which tries to maintain an exhaustive catalogue of freeware and shareware, and is therefore not a reliable indicator of notability. Gurt Posh ( talk) 13:52, 3 August 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. Courcelles 00:10, 11 August 2011 (UTC) reply
Wikipedia is not a newspaper, no point of having an article on a future sports event. Wikiglobaleditor ( talk) 13:42, 3 August 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Courcelles 00:11, 11 August 2011 (UTC) reply
This player has never appeared in a fully-professional league, which means he fails WP:NFOOTBALL; also fails WP:GNG. Giant Snowman 12:31, 3 August 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Courcelles 00:11, 11 August 2011 (UTC) reply
I can't find any reliable coverage of this term whatsoever, indicating that it is a WP:NEOLOGISM and should therefore be deleted. SmartSE ( talk) 12:06, 3 August 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Courcelles 00:11, 11 August 2011 (UTC) reply
Contested PROD, reason given was that he was "notable for college soccer career". However, he still fails WP:NFOOTY as he has not played at a fully-professional level of football. Also fails WP:GNG due to a lack of any significant media coverage beyond WP:ROUTINE and WP:NTEMP. -- Jimbo [online] 11:46, 3 August 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Courcelles 00:11, 11 August 2011 (UTC) reply
PROD-contested by article creator. Because Wikipedia is not a cookbook. elektrik SHOOS ( talk) 11:22, 3 August 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Courcelles 00:12, 11 August 2011 (UTC) reply
No coverage at all in secondary sources. Fails WP:CLUB Ka Faraq Gatri ( talk) 11:12, 3 August 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Courcelles 00:12, 11 August 2011 (UTC) reply
Despite the article being around for nearly five years, no-one has found any evidence that the guy is notable. — RHaworth ( talk · contribs) 10:08, 3 August 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Unsourced, deletion proposal unopposed. Sandstein 18:35, 11 August 2011 (UTC) reply
No indication of the tactic/move's notability. Doesn't fit into any CSD criteria. Mato ( talk) 22:08, 27 July 2011 (UTC) reply
Delete A player stands in the "pocket" when they are some distance behind a ruck and is usually a prelude to a drop goal attempt. Passing to that player has no special term as far as I know and even if it did it is no more notable than any other pass. However, a description of "Pocket" could be included in Glossary of rugby union terms. AIRcorn (talk) 12:58, 31 July 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Courcelles 22:32, 3 August 2011 (UTC) reply
Not notable actress, minor roles only - search returns little reliable to create a biographical article about a low notable person. Off2riorob ( talk) 22:08, 27 July 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete as not having sufficient sourcing to satisfy the general notability guideline. Aaron Brenneman ( talk) 16:17, 13 August 2011 (UTC) reply
Ephemeral project, only just started. No independent sources. Does not meet WP:GNG. Crusio ( talk) 09:18, 3 August 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Courcelles 00:14, 10 August 2011 (UTC) reply
Apparently non-notable Internet celebrity with dubious claims of notability Rymatz ( talk) 12:22, 27 July 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Courcelles 00:13, 10 August 2011 (UTC) reply
another non notable sporting contest. a mere 8 fighters and only 1 was notable. fails WP:GNG. also nominating:
LibStar ( talk) 00:32, 27 July 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus. Courcelles 00:13, 10 August 2011 (UTC) reply
Ephemeral project. No independent sources about the project (apart from the odd in-passing mention), no indication of notability. Does not meet WP:GNG. Article was deleted after a previous AfD, but then re-created with an "impact" section. None of that seems to establish notability, however. Crusio ( talk) 18:06, 20 July 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus. Courcelles 00:12, 10 August 2011 (UTC) reply
Ephemeral project. No independent sources about the project, no indication of notability. Does not meet WP:GNG. Crusio ( talk) 18:25, 20 July 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman ( talk) 00:16, 11 August 2011 (UTC) reply
This software product does not appear to be notable. The external links all read like press releases rather than a real discussion of the product, and probably do not qualify as reliable sources either. The article creator has been straightforward about his WP:COI. VQuakr ( talk) 07:40, 3 August 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy delete. JamesBWatson ( talk) 14:20, 5 August 2011 (UTC) reply
This person appears to fail the notability guideline at WP:NACTOR. The roles claimed in the article are not significant, the references appear to fail verification, and I am unable to find anything more reliable. VQuakr ( talk) 07:12, 3 August 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman ( talk) 00:15, 11 August 2011 (UTC) reply
Original AfD was improperly closed as Speedy Keep because of the nature of the Nominator. Google indicates no reliable sources. There are many multitudes of scripting languages, but most are not notable. There are no reliable sources to indicate this one forth-derivative language is more notable than any of the thousands of others. HominidMachinae ( talk) 06:56, 3 August 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus. Sandstein 18:01, 11 August 2011 (UTC) reply
It's either about a word, (in which case it shouldn't be here), a word construct, (in which case it should be here), or a farm, (in which case it's an unnotable farm, and shouldn't be here). Would've prodded but it, but incredibly it's been here for seven years. Dylanfromthenorth ( talk) 11:50, 26 July 2011 (UTC) reply
Move It should be moved to the Wiktionary but
deleted here because it's more of a definition.
Puffin
Let's talk!
11:48, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
reply
*Keep when a word of phrase takes a life in its own work & is commented on, it becomes notable. the articles is more than a definition DGG ( talk ) 03:38, 8 August 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) — Tom Morris ( talk) 10:31, 10 August 2011 (UTC) reply
Unencyclopedic. Either merge with Libyan Civil War or delete. NPOV issues. I don't see the point of this article as part of Wikipedia.-- NWA.Rep ( talk) 06:22, 3 August 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman ( talk) 00:14, 11 August 2011 (UTC) reply
No evidence of notability TonyStarks ( talk) 05:05, 3 August 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Black Kite (t) (c) 00:15, 11 August 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman ( talk) 00:14, 11 August 2011 (UTC) reply
No evidence of notability TonyStarks ( talk) 05:05, 3 August 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) — Tom Morris ( talk) 10:29, 10 August 2011 (UTC) reply
Notability not established, and Wikipedia is not news. Article started just after subject's death with a promise of sources to come, and when queried as to why the article was put in mainspace with no sources, the article creator replied that "Wikipedia is a trusted source of news." Unfortunately, policy says otherwise, and literally half the article is about the subject's death and funeral. MSJapan ( talk) 04:27, 3 August 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Black Kite (t) (c) 00:16, 11 August 2011 (UTC) reply
Fails WP:GNG and WP:NSPORT#BASKETBALL. He has not received much coverage as an individual, did not get drafted to the NBA, and does not currently play for a top tier team internationally. Jrcla2 ( talk) 03:40, 3 August 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman ( talk) 00:14, 11 August 2011 (UTC) reply
Procedural nomination of a proposed deletion contested at requests for undeletion; nominator's rationale was "Notability not shown by reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject, as required by WP:BIO, nor does it satisfy the requirements of WP:AUTHOR". Your thoughts? Arbitrarily0 ( talk) 03:29, 3 August 2011 (UTC) reply
-Delete- Not finding enough/any notability from secondary sources per the nomination. As a comment it is perhaps just too early to have an article on this person. Perhaps time will show more notability, but for now I am not seeing a reason (per policy) or a need for this article. It can always be rescued or created at a later date tyvm Pudge MclameO ( talk) 04:01, 3 August 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman ( talk) 00:13, 11 August 2011 (UTC) reply
Previously deleted in an ancient AFD, and overturned without addressing issues. No reliable independent sources to verify notability, in accordance with the general notability guideline. Only sources are self-published or primary sources that can't speak neutrally or reliably to this concept's notability. Shooterwalker ( talk) 02:51, 3 August 2011 (UTC) reply
-Delete- per nominations. Can't find reliable secondary sources. The sources referenced remind me of sourcing anything about the WoT series by using the WoT wiki. At best merge into article about Spider's article. tyvm Pudge MclameO ( talk) 04:10, 3 August 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy keep. Page soft-redirected to Wiktionary - see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2011 July 25#equidistant. Arbitrarily0 ( talk) 03:58, 3 August 2011 (UTC) reply
The page is entirely nonsense and the title is not a suitable one for an article. Michael Hardy ( talk) 02:50, 3 August 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman ( talk) 00:13, 11 August 2011 (UTC) reply
WP:NEO. I am unable to find any reliable source mentions of the term, "Digital Estate Planning." It appears to be a term being promoted by Scott R. Zucker and Michael D. Roy. But I can't find reliable secondary source coverage to establish significant coverage. ConcernedVancouverite ( talk) 02:44, 3 August 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman ( talk) 00:12, 11 August 2011 (UTC) reply
Barely meets notability requirements if at all--holds an obscure record and directed a short film. — Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 01:47, 3 August 2011 (UTC) reply
Delete Non notable per
WP:VERIFY.
Puffin
Let's talk!
11:45, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
reply
The result was Speedily Deleted per A7 by DGG @ 01:33, 7 August 2011 (UTC). After Midnight 0001 14:47, 7 August 2011 (UTC) reply
Unknown candidate for US president, only source is an article in his hometown newspaper. Fails WP:BIO. NawlinWiki ( talk) 01:39, 3 August 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was Speedy keep per nom (non-admin closure)- new ref has evidence that song has charted. jsfouche ☽☾ Talk 00:51, 3 August 2011 (UTC) reply
Contested PROD. Non-notable song by fictional character. Fails WP:NSONG. jsfouche ☽☾ Talk 00:30, 3 August 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Courcelles 00:09, 10 August 2011 (UTC) reply
Non-notable film. Only Ghits are wiki sites. No GNews. Fails WP:V and WP:NFILM. jsfouche ☽☾ Talk 00:28, 3 August 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Courcelles 00:10, 10 August 2011 (UTC) reply
Contested WP:PROD. Lacks independent secondary sources to establish notability as required by WP:GNG and WP:CORPDEPTH. Wikipedia is not for promotion WP:SOAP. Msnicki ( talk) 17:12, 26 July 2011 (UTC) reply
This article should not be deleted due to the fact that it is a real product, and the things in the Article are true. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.156.225.89 ( talk) 17:23, 26 July 2011 (UTC) reply
Should not be deleted due to the fact that a download link has been posted on the Website so, people can now verify this information — Preceding unsigned comment added by Beanlovin2 ( talk • contribs) 19:12, 26 July 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Courcelles 00:09, 10 August 2011 (UTC) reply
Non-notable artist. Only ref is self-published. jsfouche ☽☾ Talk 00:18, 3 August 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Courcelles 00:09, 10 August 2011 (UTC) reply
I can establish, with some Googling, that the man has published books (and that he has written for the NYT, at least once). What I cannot establish is that those books are in fact notable. Drmies ( talk) 19:39, 20 July 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Courcelles 00:09, 10 August 2011 (UTC) reply
this article fails WP:AUTHOR, WP:GNG, WP:NBOOK and WP:BLP. the books mentioned in the article are self-published. Amsaim ( talk) 17:52, 20 July 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Courcelles 00:09, 10 August 2011 (UTC) reply
Brought to AfD because there was a removed CSD based on "sources and assertion of notability in March 2011. However, the article subject is a local level musical artist at best, who fails both GNG and BAND. Only two sources are cited in the article, and they are both dead (and not archived or locatable). The purported assertion of notability is likely from the uncited last line, where it lists places she has performed. However, just as an FYI, the Midwest Music Summit Wojcik supposedly played at features upwards of 250 bands in a single weekend. The festival seems to have only happened five times, and has apparently folded, as there has not been one since 2008. The other festivals I can find no useful info on either. There are also no GNews hits, and there isn't any press linked on the artist's official website (which is not the MySpace link listed, BTW). Official site consists of a blog, and nothing else. There are no performance dates listed at all on the site, and no reviews of past performances. According to the article, the artist released two CDs. I can find no reviews on either of them. Subject did a five question interview with AfterEllem.com in 2010, but every other hit is a YouTube video, lyrics site link, or Facebook/Tumblr-type things that are personal pages. MSJapan ( talk) 13:43, 20 July 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Courcelles 00:08, 10 August 2011 (UTC) reply
Fails WP:BIO and WP:MUSIC PseudoChron ( talk) 09:48, 20 July 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Courcelles 00:08, 10 August 2011 (UTC) reply
No reference and failed notability; a related article was already deleted here ~ AdvertAdam talk 06:25, 27 July 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. The article has only one source, Metawiki, which is not a reliable source. The "keep" opinions are contrary to WP:V, a core policy. and are consequently not taken into account. Sandstein 18:04, 11 August 2011 (UTC) reply
Non-notable web site — Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 07:35, 27 July 2011 (UTC) reply
:)
Ladsgroup
بحث
11:25, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
replyThe result was no consensus. Courcelles 00:07, 10 August 2011 (UTC) reply
This airline was only operational for four months, which in my opinion should not be enough to pass the general notability guideline. Also, I cannot see any significant coverage in reliable third-party sources, thus it clearly fails WP:CORP. AdAstra reloaded ( talk) 07:49, 27 July 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete, for all articles. No bias against creating redirects to an appropriate target if someone is so inclined. -- Bigtimepeace | talk | contribs 12:41, 12 August 2011 (UTC) reply
First batch of a long list of non-notable Transformers articles (there are still over 600 articles on these characters). These are some of the more obviously non-notable characters, none having any significant third-party sources whatsoever. I am nominating the more obvious non-notable characters here as some previous AfDs have ended in merges which are then ignored by the creator and Wikiproject until someone happens along and does it (which usually involves just redirecting the article). I've fixed two today which had been like that for six months. Black Kite (t) (c) 10:07, 27 July 2011 (UTC) reply
Mathewignash ( talk) 22:18, 31 July 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Courcelles 00:04, 10 August 2011 (UTC) reply
After removal of copyright violations, nothing much is left of this article. Notability has not been established for this organization in accordance with the general notability guidelines, which requires significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. All sourcing provided either lacks independence or merely supports existence of individual members of the organization's advisory board. Cind. amuse (Cindy) 14:50, 27 July 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Courcelles 00:03, 10 August 2011 (UTC) reply
This article doesn't meet the inclusion criteria. Local politician and preacher - served on city council and as president of local branch of civil rights organization. The sources are all obituaries (I think these are all paid obits, which are not considered reliable sources). There seems to be no real independent coverage of this man and his legacy doesn't appear to extend beyond the city. Karanacs ( talk) 15:27, 27 July 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. No sources = no article. Sandstein 18:33, 11 August 2011 (UTC) reply
No sources.
StevePrutz (
talk)
16:07, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
reply
comment Problem here is we have no single reference. Author should be informed giving at least 1 reliable source under WP:RS. Sehmeet singh Talk 16:21, 27 July 2011 (UTC) reply
*Delete This is know under different names in different locales. Unfortunately, it maybe be played commonly, but because we have not third party sources, this is not wikipedia-article worthy.
Curb Chain (
talk) 07:29, 10 August 2011 (UTC)Stricken out because sources provided in this afd does not describe this game, under further investigation
Curb Chain (
talk)
07:34, 10 August 2011 (UTC)
reply
The result was delete. Courcelles 00:03, 10 August 2011 (UTC) reply
Fails both WP:WEB and WP:GNG. LiteralKa ( talk) 17:50, 27 July 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus. Courcelles 00:02, 10 August 2011 (UTC) reply
Non-notable club competition. – Muboshgu ( talk) 18:58, 27 July 2011 (UTC) reply
I sometimes forget to check for past nominations before an XFD, and this is one of those times. However, it seemed to pass last time on WP:GOOGLEHITS and the unchallenged notion that "two functioning RS's" satisfies GNG. – Muboshgu ( talk) 19:00, 27 July 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was redirect to CRDF Global. People are unconvinced that this is independently notable. Sandstein 18:15, 11 August 2011 (UTC) reply
An initiative to spur economic development. Just because it is funded by the U.S. Department of State does not exempt the author from providing evidence of notability. — RHaworth ( talk · contribs) 20:51, 27 July 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was redirect to Norilana Books. Black Kite (t) (c) 00:26, 11 August 2011 (UTC) reply
Unsourced. StevePrutz ( talk) 21:10, 27 July 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. v/r - T P 22:18, 9 August 2011 (UTC) reply
No clear reason of notability. Does not meet any of the requirements in Wikipedia:Notability (sports)#Boxing Cambalachero ( talk) 21:43, 27 July 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. Sandstein 18:25, 11 August 2011 (UTC) reply
Lacks references and is of poor quality. I'm not sure how to clean it up, and it would need a lot of work to stay around. Almost no citations. Ender The Xenocide | ( Talk | Contribs) 23:21, 27 July 2011 (UTC) reply