Yeah, I saw that. I'm looking into it right now, including a sockcheck. Bearcat ( talk) 01:41, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Islamic Relief, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you..-- Bali Makmur ( talk) 21:35, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
/info/en/?search=Draft:List_of_websites_blocked_in_the_United_States Ironcurtain2 ( talk) 07:53, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Leonie Cooper, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Socialist society. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:51, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
I note you have not voted yourself in the corbyn beauty pageant, if you were going to vote ... the amusing thing is i sure Corbyn himself would not mind which picture it was :) -- BOD -- 22:25, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
Please see my comments on your proposal re Category:Ports of Nepal Hugo999 ( talk) 23:27, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
As a participant of WikiProject LGBT studies, you are invited to participate in the third annual Wiki Loves Pride campaign, which runs through the month of June. The purpose of the campaign is to create and improve content related to LGBT culture and history. How can you help?
Looking for topics? The Tasks page, which you are welcome to update, offers some ideas and wanted articles.
This campaign is supported by the Wikimedia LGBT+ User Group, an officially recognized affiliate of the Wikimedia Foundation. The group's mission is to develop LGBT-related content across all Wikimedia projects, in all languages. Visit the affiliate's page at Meta-Wiki for more information, or follow Wikimedia LGBT+ on Facebook. Remember, Wiki Loves Pride is about creating and improving LGBT-related content at Wikimedia projects, and content should have a neutral point of view. One does not need to identify as LGBT or any other gender or sexual minority to participate. This campaign is about adding accurate, reliable information to Wikipedia, plain and simple, and all are welcome! If you have any questions, please leave a message on the campaign's talk page.
Thanks, and happy editing! --- Another Believer ( Talk) 19:46, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Nikolaos Nikolopoulos, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Achaia. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 13:33, 1 June 2016 (UTC)
The Board of Trustees of the Wikimedia Foundation has appointed a committee to lead the search for the foundation’s next Executive Director. One of our first tasks is to write the job description of the executive director position, and we are asking for input from the Wikimedia community. Please take a few minutes and complete this survey to help us better understand community and staff expectations for the Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director.
Thank you, The Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Search Steering Committee via MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 21:48, 1 June 2016 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited London Legacy Development Corporation, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Biggs. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:04, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Hey :)
I'd just like to point out a few things regarding the draft you just created:
I'm not disagreeing with splitting it into a new article, just please be careful with this!
[ stwalkerster| talk 03:04, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Murder of Jo Cox is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Murder of Jo Cox until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 06:58, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
Where is this other nomination? Surely it would be at the current AfD's page title? StillWaitingForConnection ( talk) 18:09, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
You and AGF don't get along very well, I think. "Pointy, sly and contentious"? Drmies ( talk) 11:51, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
Please see this discussion Mlpearc ( open channel) 15:39, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Same-sex marriage in the United Kingdom, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Unitarians. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:01, 11 July 2016 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hallel Yaffa Ariel-- Bolter21 ( talk to me) 18:53, 13 July 2016 (UTC)
Little late in writing this but wanted to say that I hope there aren't any hard feelings about Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Reactions_to_the_2016_Orlando_nightclub_shooting. Hope you know that it has nothing to do with animus toward the LGBTQ community or anything. I just feel that many of the news-related articles are TOOSOON but it's becoming clear I'm in the minority with that opinion (e.g., Talk:2016_shooting_of_Baton_Rouge_police_officers#Way_too_soon). I'm recalibrating my perceptions of the community norm based on the feedback in the AFD.
TL;DR - sorry if I put you through any undue stress, especially related to such a traumatic event to folks in the LGBTQ community. EvergreenFir (talk) 03:06, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Electoral division of Blain, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Terry Mills (politician). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:25, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
Category:Clive Palmer, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Bearcat ( talk) 01:30, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
Hey, just explaining my undoing your change to Division of Bass - it's actually only had sixteen different members (equal with Bendigo, Denison and Swan), but Warwick Smith was the member twice. :) Frickeg ( talk) 08:44, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Asia/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge and Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like South East Asia, Japan/China or India etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. At some stage we hope to run some contests to benefit Asian content, a destubathon perhaps, aimed at reducing the stub count would be a good place to start, based on the current Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon which has produced near 200 articles in just three days. If you would like to see this happening for Asia, and see potential in this attracting more interest and editors for the country/countries you work on please sign up and being contributing to the challenge! This is a way we can target every country of Asia, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant! Thank you. -- Ser Amantio di Nicolao Che dicono a Signa? Lo dicono a Signa. 01:16, 20 October 2016 (UTC)
Hello, AusLondonder. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Your comments solicited here: Talk:Legal_history_of_cannabis_in_Canada#Rename_Cannabis_in_Canada_or_create_new_article.3F. Goonsquad LCpl Mulvaney ( talk) 08:10, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article United Kingdom general election, 2015 (London) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/United Kingdom general election, 2015 (London) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TheMagikCow ( talk) 17:52, 20 January 2017 (UTC)
Couldn't you just put in a regular deletion request? MB298 ( talk) 06:25, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
Another user already declined your PROD, so now you have to take it to AfD if you think it should be deleted. Me-123567-Me ( talk) 01:20, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
My apologies, it was a speedy tag. But if a speedy was declined, it is likely a PROD will be too. I suggest not wasting your time and going right to AfD if you feel strongly about it. Me-123567-Me ( talk) 01:24, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lavender Greens is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lavender Greens until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Me-123567-Me ( talk) 18:39, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Of recurring events in location establishment categories
And thousands more. You want to change what articles such as these are categorized, I suggest WP:RFC or the talk page for WP:Categorization. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 17:16, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
Hi, I'm TonyBallioni. AusLondonder, thanks for creating Lavender Hill High School!
I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. If you could add references to [WP:V
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.
TonyBallioni ( talk) 16:14, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
The article Lavender Hill High School has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
TM 16:00, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lavender Hill High School is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lavender Hill High School until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TM 16:04, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved.
I wasn't aware of that particular CSD criterion. I want to populate those Mexico regional radio station stub cats but am not familiar with stub sorting and would need to create 32 templates and edit more than 1,200 articles. Would it be possible for you to help me with that? Raymie ( t • c) 08:37, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Steve Christian, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Dan Koehl ( talk) 07:15, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Me-123567-Me. I noticed that you made a comment on the page Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/California Green Party Archives that didn't seem very civil, so it has been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Me-123567-Me ( talk) 17:28, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
"A bit of a patronizing arse" may be relatively mild compared to some other things I heard recently, but it is still a personal attack. Kindly refrain. Thank you, Drmies ( talk) 03:31, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
As someone who deals with current event articles, I am soliciting comments from you on my first attempt at a Wikipedia essay: WP:DJTG/ WP:HOLDYOURHORSES. I've started a section on the talk page of the essay for comments (or you can just edit the article). Having worked on current event articles and terrorism lists, I thought this essay might be useful when addressing editors who add content prematurely (e.g., labeling an even as Islamist terrorism before RS proclaim it to be so). If you have the time and energy, feel free to comment or edit on it. Cheers! EvergreenFir (talk) 04:21, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for reminding that a copy of the same tag need to be posted at the talk page of the page creator. I have been placing tags on the page alone so far. Bilingual2000 ( talk) 06:58, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kroonstad, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pick'n'Pay. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:51, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
So... Wtmitchell blocks AusLondoner for twelve hours with the rationale to stop series of edits flouting WP:ENGVAR... Fifteen hours after their last edit?! Presumably the edits of concern are those most recent, labelled "per WP:TIES"- but none of those, that I can see, have been reverted, which begs the question as to how disruptive they were. In any case; where's the discussion, the escalated series of warnings, even? — O Fortuna! Imperatrix mundi. 09:01, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
AusLondonder ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I'm not sure whether this is a mistake or not. I'm a regular editor in good-standing. Absolutely no complaint was made on any forum by any editor about my conduct. I received no warning or discussion about the block, as is generally the accepted precedent per WP:BEFOREBLOCK and I received zero notification or explanation of the block from the admin, in breach of WP:EXPLAINBLOCK. That policy states "The community expects that blocks will be made with good reasons only, based upon reviewable evidence and reasonable judgment" and "Administrators must supply a clear and specific block reason that indicates why a user was blocked...Administrators should notify users when blocking them by leaving a message on their user talk page". The admin, in their blocking summary, apart from threatening me with an indefinite block, stated the reason was "to stop series of edits flouting WP:ENGVAR". However, none of my edits have been reverted, even by the blocking admin and I simply changed spelling to, for example, New Zealand English on Suburbs of Nelson per WP:TIES which states "an article on a topic that has strong ties to a particular English-speaking nation should use the (formal, not colloquial) English of that nation". The admin has not engaged with me nor other editors since the block. Very happy to discuss any concerns with the reviewing admin.
Accept reason:
Bizarre block. No discussion, no warning, not even a block notification, even though AusLondoner's last edit was 16 hours before the block was applied. This was a very bad block. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • ( contribs) 12:25, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
I want to acknowledge my judgemental error here and to apologize for the block which I precipitously and improperly placed following on that judgemental error. This is discussed in some detail at WP:ANI#Wtmitchell's block of AusLondonder, and I don't want to rehash that discussion here. I do want to to apologize here, though, both for my bad judgement in this instance and for the block which I improperly placed as a result of that bad judgement. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 00:39, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Wtmitchell's block of AusLondonder. -- BrownHairedGirl (talk) • ( contribs) 13:04, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
Can anyone help me write the article with finished contracts? — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
NIS Construction (
talk •
contribs) 16:21, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
Is it possible to help me write an article on the corporation. I am the marketer and I have never written an article on wikipedia.
NIS Construction (
talk) 16:28, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
Hi AusLondonder
I was just checking your contribs from yesterday [1] to see if I could find any trace of what might have prompted the block.
No sign of that, which makes the block look even more bizarre, but I did spot one small unimportant thing. Several of your edits which rightly corrected the spelling of International Labour Organization used an edit summary which included a link to WP:BRINT, which is a redirect to WP:Redirect#Bypass_redirects_in_navigational_templates. That clearly isn't what you meant, so I presume it was just a mistaken recollection of another shortcut.
Obviously, that small glitch in no way justifies any reproach, let alone an out-of-the-blue block ... but I just thought I'd point it out for future reference, in case someone gets antsy about it.
Hope this helps! If not, pls ignore.
Best wishes, -- BrownHairedGirl (talk) • ( contribs) 22:06, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
The article Enrique Guerrero Salom has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.
If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{ prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Luis150902 ( talk | contribs) 20:14, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
Hello. I invite you to join a centralized discussion about naming issues related to China and Taiwan. Szqecs ( talk) 10:33, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
In a recent edit to the page 2017 Stockholm attack, you changed one or more words or styles from one national variety of English to another. Because Wikipedia has readers from all over the world, our policy is to respect national varieties of English in Wikipedia articles.
For a subject exclusively related to the United Kingdom (for example, a famous British person), use British English. For something related to the United States in the same way, use American English. For something related to India, use Indian English. For something related to another English-speaking country, such as Canada, Australia, or New Zealand, use the variety of English used there. For an international topic, use the form of English that the original author of the article used.
In view of that, please don't change articles from one version of English to another, even if you don't normally use the version in which the article is written. Respect other people's versions of English. They, in turn, should respect yours. Other general guidelines on how Wikipedia articles are written can be found in the Manual of Style. If you have any questions about this, you can ask me on my talk page or visit the help desk. Thank you. AusLondonder ( talk) 19:48, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
I think you made a big mistake on this. The article is written in British English. So the people have to use the British words. Look at the discussion page.-- Rævhuld ( talk) 19:53, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
Title doesn't match text Jutta Steinruck vs. Ulrike Rodust, -- Mandavi ( talk) 18:11, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Aniar, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. also disruptive editing on Locks Brasserie and The Greenhouse (restaurant) plus POV-pushing. The Banner talk 22:19, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
Please stop reverting, as per the discussion on the 420 project I'm restoring them all, Thank you. – Davey2010 Talk 01:41, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
I declined G4 on this based on a review of the deleted version, I feel that the sourcing provided appears substantially different. This is of course without prejudice to other deletion mechanisms, such as AfD. Note that I had previously been asked about this earlier in the day, see my talk page. Best regards, -- joe decker talk 05:44, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
If you haven't it's at Wikipedia:Don't template the regulars. There was no disruptive editing on my part. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 19:14, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
The article Abby Tomlinson has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Inops (
talk) 22:45, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
Just FYI, another editor (not me) removed the word "false". I put it back in per longstanding consensus, but then it occurred to me that it's not proper to revert merely because of no consensus. So it's best if someone else (like you) puts that word back, given that I think it's overkill. Anyway, you wrote "???" in your edit summary, so I came here to explain. Cheers. Anythingyouwant ( talk) 05:03, 18 April 2017 (UTC)
I hand typed WCPW Pro Wrestling World Cup 2017 out. I understand and begrudgingly agree with it's deletion, but I did not copy and paste anything minus the bracket templates. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hiitit ( talk • contribs) 00:54, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
Hello. I have removed the dog again since there was NO consensus for adding it in the discussions on the talk page. The only one who wanted to add it was you, while multiple editors opposed it. - Tom | Thomas.W talk 09:53, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that Srinagar (Lok Sabha constituency) by-election, 2017, a page that you created, has been tagged for deletion. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Kautilya3 ( talk) 21:23, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
If you feel strongly about the matter, then take it to the Talk:Kiev/naming page, because that's where it's going to be decided -- not at the "Kyi, Shchek and Khoryv" article. AnonMoos ( talk) 07:24, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
Dear AusLondonder, The name Kiev is incorrect. The correct name is Kyiv, Kiev - is a Russian version of Kyiv, and it already has been proved as incorrect. For the more details, please, check the link with grammar background on this issue by Radio Svoboda: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hk8SiM75_eE — Preceding unsigned comment added by Annapetrenko ( talk • contribs) 20:38, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
You re-added 2017 Manchester Arena bombing to Template:Islamic terrorism in Europe (2014–present) and you added the template to the article without edit summaries. The attack has not been determined to be Islamic terrorism in any reliable sources that I'm aware of. Please join the talk page discussion to justify adding this template. Thank you.- Mr X 11:21, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
Can you please remove it? Your rationale is obsolete. Zigzig20s ( talk) 17:53, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
You are invited to create and improve LGBT-related content at Wikipedia and other Wikimedia projects throughout the month of June as part of the fourth annual Wiki Loves Pride campaign. Feel free to add new and expanded content on the project's Results page. Happy editing! --- Another Believer ( Talk) 14:59, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Aaron Bastani is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aaron Bastani until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. – Arms & Hearts ( talk) 17:45, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
Hello AusLondonder. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Category:History of Cleveland County, Arkansas, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The category is not empty at this point. Thank you. ~ GB fan 10:54, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
Hello AusLondonder. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Category:History of Tishomingo County, Mississippi, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The category is not empty at this point. Thank you. ~ GB fan 10:54, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
WikiLGBT is on Twitter! | |
---|---|
|
"Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Grenfell Tower fire, you may be blocked from editing. AusLondonder (talk) 03:16, 14 June 2017 (UTC)"
What does this mean; I am not being "disruptive." Was this message intended for someone else? Am I supposed to register before I edit? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2605:E000:7FC0:7B:410:4122:4335:F6DD ( talk) 03:19, 14 June 2017 (UTC)
On 14 June 2017, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Grenfell Tower fire, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Mjroots ( talk) 12:57, 15 June 2017 (UTC)
I think you/we meant B in Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2017_June_16#Organisations_based_in_Bolivia. Oculi ( talk) 17:06, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
There's a claim that you may have supported this because you believed that ten people were killed. Can you confirm or deny that? Cheers. The Rambling Man ( talk) 18:50, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Aaron Bastani is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aaron Bastani (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. -- RoySmith (talk) 23:29, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
Did you try to comply with WP:BEFORE, prior to nominating the article on Anne Marie Waters for deletion?
Your nomination said she was merely a failed candidate. Yet, when I google searched her I found half a dozen topics where coverage of her was not about her "failed candidacy". Geo Swan ( talk) 18:15, 26 June 2017 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Aaron Bastani, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for Deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discusion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Light2021 ( talk) 20:38, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
Your recent edit to the page Lee Rhiannon doesn't make it clear that the issue was more than just education funding. Would you mind if I made an edit to that effect. Gumsaint ( talk) 03:58, 29 June 2017 (UTC)
Agree with deletion of categories "195 by country" and "196 by country" but not categories "195 by continent" and "196 by continent" Hugo999 ( talk) 23:36, 2 July 2017 (UTC)
Here you removed {{ Use British English}} from Angers. While WP:TIES talks about which dialect should be used for new articles, my understanding of {{ Use British English}}, based on its documentation, is that it's descriptive, not prescriptive. The article happens to be currently written in British English, and WP prefers that subsequent edits maintain consistency unless there is good reason to convert to another dialect (in this case, there isn't). The purpose of the template is to guide subsequent authors, and, at least in theory, the ENGVAR tool; this is an independent concept from WP:TIES. Did I miss something? David Brooks ( talk) 02:14, 13 July 2017 (UTC)
Hi Aus. You recently added a cat to Jamie Waylett: Prisoners and detainees of England and Wales. I've no idea what he's up to, but I assume he's out and about now. Unless that cat is slightly misnamed, it doesn't apply to him. Could you remove it? Cheers, Bromley86 ( talk) 10:25, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
Hi, I'm Boleyn. AusLondonder, thanks for creating Pholisa Makeleni!
I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. This has been tagged as needing more references and as a stub.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.
Boleyn ( talk) 13:01, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Please take this to the talk page, I've opened a discussion there. This is Paul ( talk) 16:40, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia: Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding whether the murder of Jo Cox can be classed as a terrorist incident. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. The thread is " Talk:Murder of Jo Cox".The discussion is about the topic Murder of Jo Cox. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! -- This is Paul ( talk) 17:26, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for creating Noenieput, AusLondonder!
Wikipedia editor Anoptimistix just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Hello thanks for contibutions, this article about village passes WP:V, as South African police's website confirms it, however other contents like towns location and province could not be verified as the source does not provides information about them. If you add more source than feel free to remove the {{refimprove}} tag. Once again thanks for your contributions
To reply, leave a comment on Anoptimistix's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
Anoptimistix ( talk) 12:39, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for creating Francis Zammit Dimech, AusLondonder!
Wikipedia editor Blythwood just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Since there's a picture on Commons (not a great one to be fair) I've added it. A bot had added foreign-language links so I purged the page to activate them. Hope that's all OK.
To reply, leave a comment on Blythwood's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
Blythwood ( talk) 17:30, 6 September 2017 (UTC)
I have nominated you for Autopatrolled rights at WP:PERM/A, an administrator have asked you whether you commit to fill bare URLs which are cited as reference. Well I think you should say yes as filling bareurls is very easy, all you have to do is go at https://tools.wmflabs.org/refill/ and enter page name, this will automatically fillup bare URL's Anoptimistix ( talk) 00:17, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
It was my pleasure nominating a great content creator like you. Anoptimistix ( talk) 11:31, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
Hi AusLondonder, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the "autopatrolled" permission to your account, as you have created numerous, valid articles. This feature will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to reduce the workload on new page patrollers. For more information on the autopatrolled right, see Wikipedia:Autopatrolled. Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! Schwede 66 19:14, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
You made this edit to the European X-ray free-electron laser article and reverted a change to the map, but the source already cited does not appear to back up the way the article now reads. I had raised this on the article's talk page a few days ago. Would you be able to weigh in over there please? Beorhtwulf ( talk) 20:40, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
Hello, AusLondonder. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Rivals of the Ripper".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}
, {{db-draft}}
, or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac ( talk) 11:13, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
Thank you for creating several articles on women and their works over the past couple of months. We have become aware of your contributions thanks to research undertaken by
Bobo.03 at the University of Minnesota. You might be interested in becoming a member of our WikiProject Women in Red where we are actively trying to reduce Wikipedia's content gender gap. If you would like to receive news of our activities without becoming a member, you can simply add your name to our mailing list. In any case, thank you for actively contributing to the coverage of women (currently, 17.11% of English Wikipedia's biographies).
| ||
(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) |
-- Ipigott ( talk) 10:10, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a Move review of Grand Duchy of Kraków. Because you participated in the requested move, you might want to participate in the move review. Academicoffee71 ( talk) 05:04, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Killing_of_Patrick_Harman. Zazpot ( talk) 07:31, 6 October 2017 (UTC)
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
For finding the edits by that vandal who boasted on Reddit. Slashme ( talk) 19:58, 13 October 2017 (UTC) |
I tried to ping you, but sometimes pings do not work. Could you please have a look at what I wrote there? There is no hurry. Thanks.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 19:01, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Turkey#RfC--lead. Winged Blades of Godric On leave 11:52, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
Welcome to
Women in Red's November 2017 worldwide online editathons.
| ||
(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) |
- Megalibrarygirl ( talk) 16:19, 21 October 2017 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Hello AusLondoner, Can you supply your reason for your complete removal of my recent edit? -- ThorpeCloud ( talk) 19:21, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
I recommend you or someone else start a discussion on "Reactions to..." question. I think the threshold is rather obvious: simple and almost unanimous condemnation, condolences, or whatever the trend may be needs to be met with deletion, a selective merge, or at least a completely different outlook on how these pages are written. Without an actual plan in place, I have little choice but to keep nominating these articles for deletion, and thus far participants have agreed with my rationale. Thanks for bringing that category to my attention; articles like this are simply ridiculous and fall under what Wikipedia is not. TheGracefulSlick ( talk) 17:56, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
AusLondonder I watch with surprise how someone would just wake up to revert an edit that was fully sourced with 8 valids references, claiming the edit was not sourced and duly promotional. You just have to mention each sentence that was not backed up with a valid source and was promotional. KingMak1 ( talk) 07:47, 25 October 2017 (UTC)
Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.BTW did you edit under any other account before?-- Shrike ( talk) 19:15, 25 October 2017 (UTC)
Hi.
I am concerned that conservatives like AMW are being misrepresented by Wikipedia. I wonder if you can tell me why you think my edit is not impartial, given I have quoted AMW, ratger than someone else writing about her. If someone came to get an opinion of your political views, would you rather they asked you directly, or asked say me, who knows very little about you? This is what the Wikipedia entry for AMW is like. Lazy, heavily left leaning, and making no attempt whatsoever to hear what the real person has to say
Whether you know it or not, you have the power to censor the truth. You can claim that edits such as mine are being inaccurate or biased, but before you do, why not actually read what Ms. Waters has to say for herself? Go to Breitbart.com and read her articles. Listen to the Delingpole podcast interview with her. And then come back and tell me, with a straight face, that the Wikipedia entry isn't the most awful leftist propaganda.
Left or right, you have to acknowledge truth of an individual comes from their mouth, and no other.
Please also look up conservative, far right, democrat and British culture and values, to familiarise yourself with the claims
Andrew Ahg196 ( talk) 08:30, 29 October 2017 (UTC)
AusLondoner - you seem to make a habit of altering items that don't fit your personal political views ? Not very helpful.
I stand by every single word I typed about Lady Nugee (AKA 'Emily Thornberry'). Please put them back and don't remove valid additions by British-born observers of the hypocritical side of British politics. Accurate123 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Accurate123 ( talk • contribs) 15:55, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
May I ask your credentials to edit a political piece on a British politician. Are you Austrian as your handle suggests? If so, may I ask what qualifies you to edit entries on Wikipedia on the British and their politics.
Secondary sources? This is truly a nonsense if ever I heard it. A politician is in the business of politics. They make their living from it. They have nothing to hide, what they are is their product. If you would rather hear the views of a right wing politician from secondary sources (which happens to be heavily left biased) you get all sorts of opinions which do not represent the person. What is the reasoning for prioritising secondary sources? Can you explain?
Andrew
Ahg196 ( talk) 19:05, 29 October 2017 (UTC)
I know my personal opinion doesn't matter, but I will still express my opinion that your system is a nonsense. If you have a section titled political views, surely taking the person's actual statements about what they believe is more valid than a third party's opinion on their beliefs? If it doesn't, then BLP's should be ignored on Wikipedia as being pure propaganda.
I have not mentioned my views on the EU referendum, and for you to bring them up is concerning. Would it change your mind if I had voted remain? I am not interested in rubbishing anyone, I just feel they deserve a fair hearing. As a publication which prides itself in impartiality, Wikipedia and this editors like you who decide what goes and what doesn't, must at least hear out what people have to say.
Since my complaint, I found this article which explains a lot. I expect you'll tell me it's not a credible source - probably because it criticises Wikipedia.
http://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/102601/how-left-conquered-wikipedia-part-1-david-swindle
Since you seem to patrol the moves pages, if you come across more Tobias socks please mark for attention at the SPI or do let me know. Named socks can be reported directly at meta for global locking (he's globally banned). His disruption extends to Commons, Wikidata, de etc. cheers. — Spaceman Spiff 14:21, 31 October 2017 (UTC)
Welcome to
Women in Red's December 2017 worldwide online editathons.
| ||
(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) |
-- Ipigott ( talk) 11:09, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!
Hi! Long story short, I have a student that has created the Maoist Theory of National Struggle article. His first drafts of this were a little too much in the WP:ESSAY territory and had some other issues that you can read about here, if you like. (It's basically the history of the editing of the page and is more related to image issues at first.)
I saw that you edited the article on Maoism recently and your edit suggested that you're familiar with the topic area. I'm not really familiar with Maoism enough to know if this is something that would warrant its own article or not. The article seems to look good, but I do really want to have input from someone more familiar with Maoism. I'd be incredibly grateful if you could look it over! Another reason that I wanted to reach out to you is that I seem to remember that you're not a staunch deletionist. I don't want student work to be kept if it doesn't benefit Wikipedia, but I also don't really want an automatic knee jerk reaction, if that makes sense. Shalor (Wiki Ed) ( talk) 17:30, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
Hello, AusLondonder. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Hello, AusLondonder,
I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Murder of Janie Perrin should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Murder of Janie Perrin .
If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.
Thanks,
Onel5969 TT me 22:18, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
Welcome to
Women in Red's January 2018 worldwide online editathons.
| ||
(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) |
-- Megalibrarygirl ( talk) 18:13, 27 December 2017 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Welcome to
Women in Red's February 2018 worldwide online editathons.
New:
| ||
(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) -- Rosiestep ( talk) 14:32, 28 January 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging |
Welcome to
Women in Red's March 2018 worldwide online editathons.
| ||
(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) -- Rosiestep ( talk) 16:08, 20 February 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging |
There is an RfC at Talk:Daily Mail#Request for comment: Other criticisms section. Your input would be most helpful. -- Guy Macon ( talk) 16:07, 1 March 2018 (UTC)
Category:Social Democratic Party (UK) MEPs, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Bondegezou ( talk) 10:46, 13 March 2018 (UTC)
Welcome to
Women in Red's April 2018 worldwide online editathons.
| ||
To subscribe:
Women in Red/English language mailing list or
Women in Red/international list. To unsubscribe:
Women in Red/Opt-out list. Follow us on Twitter: |
Welcome to
Women in Red's May 2018 worldwide online editathons.
| ||
(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) -- Rosiestep ( talk) 23:11, 29 April 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging |
The South African Wikimedia chapter is awarding a limited number of full and partial scholarships to attend Wikimania 2018 in Cape Town to SADC and South African based Wikimedians. The due date for applications is 30 May. You can get more information by clicking here. Don't waste time APPLY NOW! (Google docs form provided by WMZA) 20:36, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Category:Defence agencies of the European Union requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — swpb T go beyond 16:16, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Betsie Verwoerd kleur.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 17:20, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
Wikimedia South Africa will be hosting Asaf Bartov from the Wikimedia Foundation for 5 days where he will be conducting a series of Capacity Building Workshops in Johannesburg and Cape Town. The workshops are aimed at addressing challenges faced by African Wikimedians and share tools that will enable them to better increase African content. In Johannesburg the workshops will take place on 25 - 26 May 2018 at the Goethe Institut, and in Cape Town Asaf will be meeting Wikimedians on 29 May 2018. Come and join us either in Johannesburg or Cape Town, we can pay for your travel to attend in either of these cities. You can click here to see more information or you can contact info@wikimedia.org.za. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 21:28, 20 May 2018 (UTC), delivered on behalf of Bobbyshabangu
Welcome to
Women in Red's June 2018 worldwide online editathons.
| ||
(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) |
-- Megalibrarygirl ( talk) 17:15, 29 May 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article European Parliament election, 2019 (United Kingdom) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/European Parliament election, 2019 (United Kingdom) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Vintage Feminist ( talk) 16:29, 7 June 2018 (UTC)
The due date for applying to be part of the WikiIndaba steering committee (WISCom) is this Friday the 22nd. Apply now and be part of the African Wikimedia Movement. (Message from Bobbyshabangu 10:57, 20 June 2018 (UTC))
Hello again from
Women in Red!
| ||
(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) -- Rosiestep ( talk) 14:04, 28 June 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging |
Per the discussion Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Iadarola (2nd nomination) as Iadarola's career has grown, I have added additional sources covering his primary hosting of "True North" and "The Damage Report" series with additional non TYT sources. This is in addition to his daily hosting duties on the TYT main show. I have reactivated the article to mainspace. Trackinfo ( talk) 07:53, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
An exciting new month for
Women in Red!
| ||
Latest headlines, news, and views on the Women in Red talkpage (Join the conversation!): (To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) -- Rosiestep ( talk) 11:22, 23 July 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging |
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Michael Elkins, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page New York ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:01, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Your recent edit to Mid-Coast Council is missing the reference "PMHC". You might like to fix that. Regards. -- AussieLegend ( ✉) 18:29, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
September is an exciting new month for
Women in Red's worldwide online editathons!
| ||
Latest headlines, news, and views on the Women in Red talkpage (Join the conversation!):
(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) -- Rosiestep ( talk) 01:55, 26 August 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging |
Category:Female critics of feminism, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. TM 20:36, 26 August 2018 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Angus Taylor (politician), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page North Sydney ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:31, 27 August 2018 (UTC)
Greetings!
You are receiving this message because your username or portal was listed as a participant of a WikiProject that is related to Africa, the Carribean, Cinema or theatre.
This is to introduce you to a new Wikiproject called AfroCine. This new project is dedicated to improving the Wikipedia coverage of the history, works, people, places, events, etc, that are associated with the cinema, theatre and arts of Africa, African countries, the carribbean, and the diaspora. If you would love to be part of this or you're already contributing in this area, kindly list your name as a participant on the project page here.
Furthermore, In the months of October and November, the WikiProject is organizing a global on-wiki contest and edit-a-thon tagged: The Months of African Cinema. If you would love to join us for this exciting event, also list your username as a participant for this event here. In preparation for the contest, please do suggest relevant articles that need to be created or expanded in different countries, during this event!
If you have any questions, complaints, suggestions, etc., please reach out to me personally on my talkpage! Cheers!-- Jamie Tubers ( talk) 20:50, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
How I write a good article on Wikipedia. Especially how to add references. Suppose I have read around 7-8 articles on any topic and then I wrote this in my own word. Then in that case if I add only 1-2 in-text citation and all references or I need to follow something different strategy. Please guide I am eagerly waiting to write first article which would be accepted in my first attempt. PRABHAKAR.S ( talk) 05:10, 9 September 2018 (UTC)
The Global Power City Index from Tokyo from 2017 has London 1st. I have not been following Brexit negotiations closely and don't know how much decline of London a year of that has caused, maybe it's more than I'd guess? All I know is Theresa said negotiations stalled and if a breakthrough doesn't happen in some months it'll be a very disruptive hard Brexit. I'm not suggesting any city or pair of cities is as far ahead of the next one as Victorian London or New York of c.1953, that'll probably never happen again. Sagittarian Milky Way ( talk) 15:20, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
Please join us... We have four new topics for
Women in Red's worldwide online editathons in October!
| ||
(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) -- Rosiestep ( talk) 14:46, 28 September 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging |
Greetings!
The AfroCine Project welcomes you to October, the first out of the two months which has been dedicated to improving contents that centre around the cinema of Africa, the Caribbean, and the diaspora.
This is a global online edit-a-thon, which is happening in at least 5 language editions of Wikipedia, including the English Wikipedia! Join us in this exciting venture, by helping to create or expand articles which are connected to this scope. Also remember to list your name under the participants section, if you haven't done so already.
On English Wikipedia, we would be recognizing Users who are able to achieve the following:
For further information about the contest, the recognition categories and how to participate, please visit the contest page here. For further inquiries, please leave comments on the contest talkpage or on the main project talkpage. See you around :).-- Jamie Tubers ( talk) 22:50, 03 October 2018 (UTC)
Three new topics for
WiR's online editathons in November, two of them supporting other initiatives
Continuing: | ||
Latest headlines, news, and views on the Women in Red talkpage (Join the conversation!): (To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) |
-- Megalibrarygirl ( talk) 18:40, 14 October 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Hi, and thank you for
your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give
Kyiv-Pasazhyrskyi railway station a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "
cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the
page history, which is
legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.
In most cases, once your account is
four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the
"Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be
hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a
redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at
requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at
Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Regards,
User:TheDragonFire300. (
Contact me |
Contributions). This message was left at 01:13, 17 October 2018 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Penrith, New South Wales, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Penrith ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:06, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Howdy. An Rfc at Monarchy of Australia has opened, concerning the topic head of state. GoodDay ( talk) 20:29, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
Hello, AusLondonder. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Hello, AusLondonder. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
The
WiR December editathons provide something for everyone.
Continuing: | ||
Latest headlines, news, and views on the Women in Red talkpage (Join the conversation!): (To subscribe:
Women in Red/English language mailing list and
Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe:
Women in Red/Opt-out list) |
The article The City: London and the Global Power of Finance has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Not notable
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Philafrenzy (
talk) 08:40, 3 December 2018 (UTC)
January 2019, Volume 5, Issue 1, Numbers 104-108
January events:
|
February 2019, Volume 5, Issue 2, Numbers 107-111
February events:
|
Category:Parties that campaigned for leave during the United Kingdom European Union membership referendum, 2016, which you created, has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect ( talk) 01:52, 9 March 2019 (UTC)
March 2019, Volume 5, Issue 3, Numbers 107, 108, 112, 113
Please join us for these virtual events:
| ||
|
April 2019, Volume 5, Issue 4, Numbers 107, 108, 114, 115, 116, 117
|
-- Rosiestep ( talk) 18:12, 27 March 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2018 West Footscray warehouse fire is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2018 West Footscray warehouse fire until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Step hen 02:37, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
May 2019, Volume 5, Issue 5, Numbers 107, 108, 118, 119, 120, 121
|
-- Megalibrarygirl ( talk) 16:16, 27 April 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
June 2019, Volume 5, Issue 6, Numbers 107, 108, 122, 123, 124, 125
|
-- Megalibrarygirl ( talk) 17:41, 22 May 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
July 2019, Volume 5, Issue 7, Numbers 107, 108, 126, 127, 128
|
-- Megalibrarygirl ( talk) 16:39, 25 June 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Category:Venezuela solidarity activists, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you.
Hello! I've noticed you have the WikiProject Socialism userbox in your user page, but you didn't sign up in the project. You can do so in the WikiProject Socialism page, clicking the Join WikiProject button. If you have any doubt, feel free to ask it in the WikiProject talk page. Best, -- MarioGom ( talk) 11:19, 28 July 2019 (UTC)
August 2019, Volume 5, Issue 7, Numbers 107, 108, 126, 129, 130, 131
|
-- Rosiestep ( talk) 06:43, 29 July 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
September 2019, Volume 5, Issue 9, Numbers 107, 108, 132, 133, 134, 135
|
-- Rosiestep ( talk) 16:23, 27 August 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
October 2019, Volume 5, Issue 10, Numbers 107, 108, 137, 138, 139, 140
|
-- Megalibrarygirl ( talk) 17:35, 23 September 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Greetings!
After a successful first iteration of the “Months of African Cinema” last year, we are happy to announce that it will be happening again this year, starting from October 1! In the 2018 edition of the contest, about 600 Wikipedia articles were created in at least 8 languages. There were also contributions to Wikidata and Wikimedia commons, which brought the total number of wikimedia pages created during the contest to over 1,000.
The AfroCine Project welcomes you to October, the first out of the two months which have been dedicated to creating and improving content that centre around the cinema of Africa, the Caribbean, and the diaspora. Join us in this global edit-a-thon, by helping to create or expand articles which are connected to this scope. Also remember to list your name under the participants section.
On English Wikipedia, we would be recognizing participants in the following manner:
For further information about the contest, the recognition categories and how to participate, please visit the contest page here. For further inquiries, please leave comments on the contest talkpage or on the main project talkpage. See you around :).-- Jamie Tubers ( talk) 00:50, 30 September 2019 (UTC)
November 2019, Volume 5, Issue 11, Numbers 107, 108, 140, 141, 142, 143
|
-- Rosiestep ( talk) 22:57, 29 October 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
December 2019, Volume 5, Issue 12, Numbers 107, 108, 144, 145, 146, 147
|
-- Megalibrarygirl ( talk) 18:42, 25 November 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
A tag has been placed on Category:2017 establishments in Cyprus requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian ( talk) 16:00, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Murder of Margaret Gall is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Murder of Margaret Gall until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. AussieLegend ( ✉) 15:07, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
January 2020, Volume 6, Issue 1, Numbers 146, 148, 149, 150, 151, 153
|
February 2020, Volume 6, Issue 2, Numbers 150, 151, 152, 154, 155
|
-- Megalibrarygirl ( talk) 19:30, 28 January 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
April 2020, Volume 6, Issue 4, Numbers 150, 151, 159, 160, 161, 162
Online events:
|
-- Rosiestep ( talk) 14:58, 23 March 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
May 2020, Volume 6, Issue 5, Numbers 150, 151, 163, 164, 165, 166
Online events:
|
-- Rosiestep ( talk) 20:58, 29 April 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red June 2020, Volume 6, Issue 6, Numbers 150, 151, 167, 168, 169
Online events:
|
-- Rosiestep ( talk) 17:10, 25 May 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red / July 2020, Volume 6, Issue 7, Numbers 150, 151, 170, 171, 172, 173
|
-- Rosiestep ( talk) 16:10, 28 June 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red | August 2020, Volume 6, Issue 8, Numbers 150, 151, 173, 174, 175
|
-- Rosiestep ( talk) 18:50, 26 July 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red | September 2020, Volume 6, Issue 9, Numbers 150, 151, 176, 177
|
-- Megalibrarygirl ( talk) 17:53, 29 August 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red | October 2020, Volume 6, Issue 10, Numbers 150, 173, 178, 179
|
--
Megalibrarygirl (
talk) 15:09, 21 September 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Greetings!
The AfroCine Project invites you to join us again this October and November, the two months which are dedicated to improving content about the cinema of Africa, the Caribbean, and the diaspora.
Join us in this exciting venture, by helping to create or expand contents in Wikimedia projects which are connected to this scope. Kindly list your username under the participants section to indicate your interest in participating in this contest.
We would be awarding prizes to different categories of winners:
We would be adding additional categories as the contest progresses, along with local prizes from affiliates in your countries. For further information about the contest, the prizes and how to participate, please visit the contest page here. For further inquiries, please leave comments on the contest talkpage or on the main project talkpage. Looking forward to your participation.-- Jamie Tubers ( talk) 19:22, 22nd September 2020 (UTC)
Ýou can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from this list
Women in Red | November 2020, Volume 6, Issue 11, Numbers 150, 173, 178, 180, 181
|
-- Megalibrarygirl ( talk) 18:52, 28 October 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Greetings,
Thank you very much for participating in the Months of African Cinema global contest/edit-a-thon, and thank you for your contributions so far.
It is already the middle of the contest and a lot have been achieved already! We have been able to get over 1,500 articles created in over fifteen (15) languages! This would not have been possible without your support and we want to thank you. If you have not yet listed your name as a participant in the contest page please do so.
Please make sure to list the articles you have created or improved in the article achievements' section of the contest page, so that they can be easily tracked. To be able to claim prizes, please also ensure to list your articles on the users by articles page. We would be awarding prizes to different categories of winners:
We are very excited about what has been achieved so far, but your contributions are still needed to further exceed all expectations! Let’s create more articles before the end of this contest, which is this November!!!
Thank you once again for being part of this global event! -- Jamie Tubers ( talk) 10:30, 06 November 2020 (UTC)
You can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from this list
Women in Red | December 2020, Volume 6, Issue 12, Numbers 150, 173, 178, 182, 183
|
-- Megalibrarygirl ( talk) 16:42, 26 November 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
The article National Centre for Advanced Studies has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non-notable program
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion. Apologies for the template.
Bearian (
talk) 21:00, 21 December 2020 (UTC)
Women in Red | January 2021, Volume 7, Issue 1, Numbers 182, 184, 185, 186, 187, 188
|
-- Megalibrarygirl ( talk) 03:01, 29 December 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red | February 2021, Volume 7, Issue 2, Numbers 184, 186, 188, 189, 190, 191
|
-- Rosiestep ( talk) 14:58, 27 January 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red | March 2021, Volume 7, Issue 3, Numbers 184, 186, 188, 192, 193
|
-- Rosiestep ( talk) 18:47, 26 February 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red | April 2021, Volume 7, Issue 4, Numbers 184, 188, 194, 195, 196
|
--
Megalibrarygirl (
talk) 20:15, 22 March 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
The Wikimedia LGBTQ+ User Group is holding online working days in May. As a member of WikiProject LGBT studies, editing on LGBTQ+ issues or if you identify as part of the LGBTQ+ community, come help us set goals, develop our organisation and structures, consider how to respond to issues faced by Queer editors, and plan for the next 12 months.
We will be meeting online for 3 half-days, 14–16 May at 1400–1730 UTC. While our working language is English, we are looking to accommodate users who would prefer to participate in other languages, including translation facilities.
More information, and registration details, at QW2021.-- Wikimedia LGBT+ User Group 02:36, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
Women in Red | May 2021, Volume 7, Issue 5, Numbers 184, 188, 197, 198
|
-- Rosiestep ( talk) 21:35, 28 April 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red | June 2021, Volume 7, Issue 6, Numbers 184, 188, 196, 199, 200, 201
|
-- Rosiestep ( talk) 18:48, 28 May 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red | July 2021, Volume 7, Issue 7, Numbers 184, 188, 202, 203, 204, 205
|
-- Rosiestep ( talk) 16:04, 22 June 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
A tag has been placed on Category:Flemish Interest MEPs indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 15:21, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Women in Red | August 2021, Volume 7, Issue 8, Numbers 184, 188, 204, 205, 206, 207
|
-- Megalibrarygirl ( talk) 22:23, 23 July 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red | September 2021, Volume 7, Issue 9, Numbers 184, 188, 204, 205, 207, 208
|
-- Rosiestep ( talk) 22:28, 26 August 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red | October 2021, Volume 7, Issue 10, Numbers 184, 188, 209, 210, 211
Special event:
|
-- Rosiestep ( talk) 01:34, 29 September 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Greetings!
The AfroCine Project core team is happy to inform you that the Months of African Cinema Contest is happening again this year in October and November. We invite Wikipedians all over the world to join in improving content related to African cinema on Wikipedia!
Please list your username under the participants’ section of the contest page to indicate your interest in participating in this contest. The term "African" in the context of this contest, includes people of African descent from all over the world, which includes the diaspora and the Caribbean.
The following prizes would be recognized at the end of the contest:
Also look out for local prizes from affiliates in your countries or communities! For further information about the contest, the prizes and how to participate, please visit the contest page here. For further inquiries, please leave comments on the contest talkpage or on the main project talkpage. We look forward to your participation.-- Jamie Tubers ( talk) 23:20, 30th September 2021 (UTC)
Ýou can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from this list
Women in Red | November 2021, Volume 7, Issue 11, Numbers 184, 188, 210, 212, 213
|
-- Innisfree987 ( talk) 21:27, 24 October 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Greetings,
It is already past the middle of the contest and we are really excited about the Months of African Contest 2021 achievements so far! We want to extend our sincere gratitude for the time and energy you have invested. If you have not yet participated in the contest, it is not too late to do it. Please list your username as a participant on the contest’s main page.
Please remember to list the articles you have improved or created on the article achievements' section of the contest page so they can be tracked. In order to win prizes, be sure to also list your article in the users by articles. Please note that your articles must be present in both the article achievement section on the main contest page, as well as on the Users By Articles page for you to qualify for a prize.
We would be awarding prizes to different categories of winners:
Thank you once again for your valued participation! -- Jamie Tubers ( talk) 18:50, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
You can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from this list
Women in Red | December 2021, Volume 7, Issue 12, Numbers 184, 188, 210, 214, 215, 216
|
-- Innisfree987 ( talk) 00:10, 27 November 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Happy New Year from Women in Red Jan 2022, Vol 8, Issue 1, Nos 214, 216, 217, 218, 219
|
-- Megalibrarygirl ( talk) 16:02, 28 December 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red Feb 2022, Vol 8, Issue 2, Nos 214, 217, 220, 221, 222
|
-- Megalibrarygirl ( talk) 15:09, 31 January 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
The article Konstantinos Alyssandrakis has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.
If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{ prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Liz Read! Talk! 18:37, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Women in Red Mar 2022, Vol 8, Issue 3, Nos 214, 217, 222, 223, 224, 225
|
-- Megalibrarygirl ( talk) 16:37, 27 February 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red Apr 2022, Vol 8, Issue 4, Nos 214, 217, 226, 227, 228
|
-- Megalibrarygirl ( talk) 22:44, 22 March 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Hi, 7 days ago you supported the move of the page 1987 Meerut communal riots. 7 days have elapsed and I don't know how to move a page. The move is under WP:CONSISTENT and can be justified under WP:RMUM. Could you move the page? >>> Extorc. talk 08:46, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
Any reason you don't have it active? I wanted to make a comment that might be better done in a private way. Nothing major, just a remark. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 12:23, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
Hello, AusLondonder,
Thank you for PRODding these air strips and private-use "airports". I'm not sure why years ago some page creators thought they were notable enough for their own articles. If anything, they should have been placed on a country or state list of private airports, not have stand along articles. I appreciate you taking the time to find and tag them for deletion. Liz Read! Talk! 21:12, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
I deprodded that article. I usually agree with you. I've developed it a bit and as they've had numerous state athletic championships, it's pretty clear this isn't a MILL school. As a matter of fact, I'm really curious why they'd drop such a successful track program. I'm going to reach out to an editor with more experience to research any segregation history that may be appropriate to use. Any chance you could move it to American Christian Academy (Alabama)? There are other schools by the same name, but in other states, making just the state name the correct disambiguation. It's much easier for a registered editor I understand. 174.212.212.106 ( talk) 11:53, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Women in Red May 2022, Vol 8, Issue 5, Nos 214, 217, 227, 229, 230
|
-- Megalibrarygirl ( talk) 16:51, 30 April 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Hi. A few of your recent edits refer to Indian English when changing the spelling of some words. You should know that the idea that the use of "ize" is an Americanism is a recent fallacy, and Indian spelling generally uses British spelling, which has a long history of using both "ise" and "ize". Thanks. -- Escape Orbit (Talk) 11:52, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
Women in Red June 2022, Vol 8, Issue 6, Nos 214, 217, 227, 231, 232, 233
|
-- Megalibrarygirl ( talk) 09:19, 31 May 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red July 2022, Vol 8, Issue 7, Nos 214, 217, 234, 235
|
-- Lajmmoore ( talk) 15:45, 27 June 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Hello, AusLondonder. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Aaron Bastani, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 02:01, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
Hello, AusLondonder. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Aaron Bastani".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 01:17, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
Women in Red August 2022, Vol 8, Issue 8, Nos 214, 217, 236, 237, 238, 239
|
-- Lajmmoore ( talk) 10:57, 29 July 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cat Selfies until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Rorshacma ( talk) 02:35, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
Women in Red September 2022, Vol 8, Issue 9, Nos 214, 217, 240, 241
|
-- Lajmmoore ( talk) 15:34, 31 August 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red October 2022, Vol 8, Issue 10, Nos 214, 217, 242, 243, 244
|
-- Lajmmoore ( talk) 14:58, 29 September 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red November 2022, Vol 8, Issue 11, Nos 214, 217, 245, 246, 247
|
-- Lajmmoore ( talk) 17:32, 26 October 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Category:Books about West Papua has been nominated for renaming; please see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 November 4. – Fayenatic London 15:26, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
Women in Red December 2022, Vol 8, Issue 12, Nos 214, 217, 248, 249, 250
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
-- Lajmmoore ( talk) 20:52, 26 November 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 01:24, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Happy New Year from Women in Red | January 2023, Volume 9, Issue 1, Nos 250, 251, 252, 253, 254
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
-- Lajmmoore ( talk) 18:00, 27 December 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Hello, I'm Mvcg66b3r. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, WUSA (TV), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Mvcg66b3r ( talk) 13:37, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
On 23 January 2023, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Jim Molan, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Spencer T• C 17:49, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
Women in Red Feb 2023, Vol 9, Iss 2, Nos 251, 252, 255, 256, 257, 259
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
-- Lajmmoore ( talk) 07:26, 30 January 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
On 2 February 2023, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Will Steffen, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Spencer T• C 05:50, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
Women in Red Mar 2023, Vol 9, Iss 3, Nos 251, 252, 258, 259, 260, 261
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
-- Lajmmoore ( talk) 12:51, 26 February 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Hi to whomsoever it may concern. We cannot retain former names of cities, the current name is Gurugram and not Gurgaon. Why do we need rfc ? it is common sense? If that is the case, then we should retain the city names Bombay and Madras. The advise received in preceding section is some editor's personal opinion. Personal opinions doesn't work in this case. News paper articles can write anything, they just take info from wikipedia, it is called mirroring of wikipedia. Coming to books and articles, there are still millions of articles calling cities as Bombay and Madras before their official name change. You cant take it as a standard, and forcefully rub your opinions on other editors. Your personal interest with Gurgaon instead of Gurugram cannot be endorsed by other editors. The Govt officially designated it as Gurugram city in ( Gurugram District) - https://gurugram.gov.in/department/municipal-corporation-gurugram/ Fostera12 ( talk) 14:08, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
Women in Red Apr 2023, Vol 9, Iss 4, Nos 251, 252, 262, 263, 264, 265, 266
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
-- Lajmmoore ( talk) 07:51, 27 March 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2023 United Kingdom local elections, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Blue wall. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:59, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
Women in Red May 2023, Vol 9, Iss 5, Nos 251, 252, 267, 268, 269, 270
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
-- Lajmmoore ( talk) 18:27, 27 April 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red June 2023, Vol 9, Iss 6, Nos 251, 252, 271, 272, 273
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
-- Lajmmoore ( talk) 09:14, 28 May 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red June 2023, Vol 9, Iss 7, Nos 251, 252, 274, 275, 276
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
-- Lajmmoore ( talk) 07:42, 27 June 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
On 30 June 2023, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Simon Crean, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Step hen 04:31, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
Women in Red 8th Anniversary | |
In July 2015 around 15.5% of the English Wikipedia's biographies were about women. As of July 2023, 19.61% of the English Wikipedia's biographies are about women. That's a lot of biographies created in the effort to close the gender gap. Happy 8th Anniversary! Join us for some virtual cake and add comments or memories and please keep on editing to close the gap! |
-- Lajmmoore ( talk) 11:00, 18 July 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red August 2023, Vol 9, Iss 8, Nos 251, 252, 277, 278, 279, 280
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
-- Lajmmoore ( talk) 19:24, 28 July 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red September 2023, Vol 9, Iss 9, Nos 251, 252, 281, 282, 283
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
-- Victuallers ( talk) 16:49, 25 August 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ruann Coleman until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
LibStar ( talk) 23:57, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
Women in Red October 2023, Vol 9, Iss 10, Nos 251, 252, 284, 285, 286
See also
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
-- Lajmmoore ( talk) 10:51, 29 September 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red November 2023, Vol 9, Iss 11, Nos 251, 252, 287, 288, 289
See also Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
-- Lajmmoore ( talk) 08:21, 26 October 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red December 2023, Vol 9, Iss 12, Nos 251, 252, 290, 291, 292
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
-- Lajmmoore ( talk) 20:22, 27 November 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 00:47, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Women in Red | January 2024, Volume 10, Issue 1, Numbers 291, 293, 294, 295, 296
Announcement
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
Women in Red | February 2024, Volume 10, Issue 2, Numbers 293, 294, 297, 298
Announcement
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
-- Lajmmoore ( talk 20:07, 28 January 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red | March 2024, Volume 10, Issue 3, Numbers 293, 294, 299, 300, 301
Announcements
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
-- Lajmmoore ( talk 20:21, 25 February 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2024 Legends Cricket Trophy. RoboCric Let's chat 15:20, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Caliphate State, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The National.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 18:08, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
Hello, AusLondonder,
Please use Twinkle to tag pages for speedy deletion. Then when you select CSD G4, there is a field for you to put a link to the deletion discussion where it was decided to delete this article. It's necessary for patrolling admins to check and make sure there was an AFD for each article to verify the tagging and the tag you used provides no link to a relevant AFD discussion. So, this means that the admin will have to go looking for it themselves and the AFD might be under a different page title. What happens is that, most of the time, admins see this and just move on to some other task because it's a bit of a chore. So, this tagged article will probably sit around for some hours.
Twinkle is such a useful editing tool that does SO many things, you can use it to tag articles, report vandals to noticeboards, tag for a PROD, set up an AFD discussion, maintain a deletion log for you, it's a tool I use all day when editing and I encourage you to try it out if you haven't used it yet. Liz Read! Talk! 03:51, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
Hello AusLondonder, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Sam Corne, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: not sufficiently identical to the deleted version. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. Firefangledfeathers ( talk / contribs) 21:13, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
Hi AusLondonder, I have left a message for you on Talk:Why Bharat Matters. Could you please have a look at it? Waonderer ( talk) 18:09, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on Talk:Te Whatu Ora. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Also at Talk:European settlers in New Zealand BilledMammal ( talk) 05:10, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
This issue has been discussed enough already and I consider the latest RM to be disruptive. Simple question for the nom: What has changed since the previous RMs? If consensus goes against you, you should not simply try and exhaust other editors by repeating the process with a flawed argument every couple of years. Other editors have set out above, in detail, why this proposal is flawed and why the existing name is appropriate. This is disruptive behaviour that should not be rewarded.
Just the latest instalment of the Wikipedia culture wars brought to us by a certain editor.It is better than your !vote at European settlers in New Zealand, as it does go on to include an argument that isn't just an attack on an editor, but neither is acceptable - if you see an issue with an editor, bring it up, with evidence, on their talk page or at ANI. It is inappropriate, and against policy, to bring it up on an article talk page.
Do not make personal attacks anywhere on Wikipedia. Comment on content, not on the contributor.
that the nominator has a pattern of POV-pushing and engaging in culture warsis commenting on the contributor, not content, and is against policy; I'm asking you politely to stop. If you believe there is an issue with my conduct that needs discussing, PA tells you what the appropriate forums are. BilledMammal ( talk) 07:31, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
Hello, You are misunderstanding Wikipedia's guidelines. The requirements you refer to for notability are sufficient, but not necessary for an article to be notable. Your selective choice of articles that you promote for deletion makes it appear that you are on a crusade against the IPSC. Sauer202 ( talk) 11:51, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
Hi AusLondonder :) I'm looking for people to interview here. Feel free to pass if you're not interested. Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 07:09, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
On the topic of unnotable lists of mayors, you may want to look at List of mayors of Lynwood, California, a city of just under 70,000 that seems to have mostly primary sourcing. I am unsure if it meets WP:NLIST but it doesn't seem to be an especially notable topic to me. AllTheUsernamesAreInUse ( talk) 17:35, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
I think we get non-policy !votes when there is an AfD of a US senatorial candidate close to an election. I think it is better to clean up the article and then consider what to do with the article after the election is in the rear view mirror. - Enos733 ( talk) 22:10, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
Hello, could you help with closing the RfD on David Lammy talk page and summarising? It seems there's a slim consensus on a change to British? but I do not want to make a mistake. Never done this before. Erzan ( talk) 22:40, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
Hey, want to just leave a message. A lot of the LPFMs and such that are unsourced are tough to put a source on, but if you want to run something by me, please do. I know where to look for at least reasonable resources, especially for stations that started in the pre-internet era. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 05:12, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
Wikipedia only has about 70 articles that have been placed in the geriatricists category. With that few I think we would be best off merging all of them. I really think we need to create a rule that we will not subdivide any occupation by nationality if we have under 100 articles on people who did it. This especially applies when it is a sub-cat of physicians/medical doctors, who are a sub-cat of scientists. If this was a top level occupation kline barbers. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 03:36, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
Can You Review My article.
/info/en/?search=Amalda_Liz Warrantys ( talk) 12:19, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
/info/en/?search=Draft:List_of_websites_blocked_in_the_United_States Ironcurtain2 ( talk) 07:53, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
There are currently thousands of websites blocked in the United States. a
TikTok may be banned soon too, as there is pending legislation about it. TikTok is banned on some government phones.
Currently websites such as .... are blocked in certain states, and illegal ... content is taken down in the United States.
Ironcurtain2 ( talk) 08:00, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
Women in Red | April 2024, Volume 10, Issue 4, Numbers 293, 294, 302, 303, 304
Announcements
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
-- Lajmmoore ( talk 19:41, 30 March 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Where is Kate? (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.IgnatiusofLondon (he/him • ☎️) 11:37, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
Hi, I am komaldeeppunni a student editor on Wikipedia. I was working on this article Bhai Roop Chand. Earlier, I uploaded an unfinished version of the article and the article was moved to the Draft: Bhai Roop Chand. Now I have added more information in the article with suitable sources. I request you to examine the revised draft of the article and possibly move it to the main space. Komaldeeppunni ( talk) 21:48, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
I don't disagree that these database-sourced articles don't demonstrate notability but per WP:ATD I believe it would be better to redirect them to the appropriate List of... articles. I will continue to assert this in my WP:PRODPATROLING unless there is some indication from WP:AFD or WP:MFD that deletion is preferred by the community. We could save each other both some work if you used WP:BLAR instead of WP:PROD for these. ~ Kvng ( talk) 17:18, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
Hello AusLondonder, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Alex Bhathal, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: G4: not substantially identical; much new information since the page's deletion 8 years ago. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. Ivanvector ( Talk/ Edits) 13:49, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
@ AusLondonder you think it's a bad article? Any chances to help it? 2001:14BA:4C18:F400:7876:2711:9C0:693A ( talk) 10:53, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
"Egregious username" usually only means particularly vulgar usernames or particularly offensive/denigrating usernames, not promotional usernames. I can't speak to another situation without knowing what it was. I'm happy to discuss this further at WT:U. 331dot ( talk) 19:40, 19 April 2024 (UTC)