To leave me a new message you may click here.

This user is the most active Wikipedian of all time.

• Archive the first (January–November 2006)
• Archive the second (November 2006–January 2008)
• Archive the third (January–March 2008)
• Archive the fourth (March–April 2008)
• Archive the fifth (April–June 2008)
• Archive the sixth (June–October 2008)
• Archive the seventh (October–November 2008)
• Archive the eighth (November–December 2008)
• Archive the ninth (January–February 2009)
• Archive the tenth (February–March 2009)
• Archive the eleventh (March–May 2009)
• Archive the twelfth (May–July 2009)
• Archive the thirteenth (July 2009)
• Archive the fourteenth (July–September 2009)
• Archive the fifteenth (October–December 2009)
• Archive the sixteenth (January–February 2010)
• Archive the seventeenth (March–May 2010)
• Archive the eighteenth (May–August 2010)
• Archive the nineteenth (September–October 2010)
• Archive the twentieth (November–December 2010)
• Archive the twenty-first (January–June 2011)
• Archive the twenty-second (July–December 2011)
• Archive the twenty-third (January–June 2012)
• Archive the twenty-fourth (July–December 2012)
• Archive the twenty-fifth (January–June 2013)
• Archive the twenty-sixth (July–December 2013)
• Archive the twenty-seventh (January–June 2014)
• Archive the twenty-eighth (July–December 2014)
• Archive the twenty-ninth (January–June 2015)
• Archive the thirtieth (July–December 2015)
• Archive the thirty-first (January–June 2016)
• Archive the thirty-second (July–December 2016)
• Archive the thirty-third (January–June 2017)
• Archive the thirty-fourth (July–December 2017)
• Archive the thirty-fifth (January–June 2018)
• Archive the thirty-sixth (June–December 2018)
• Archive the thirty-seventh (January–June 2019)
• Archive the thirty-eighth (June–December 2019)
• Archive the thirty-ninth (January–June 2020)
• Archive the fortieth (June–December 2020)
• Archive the forty-first (January-June 2021)
• Archive the forty-second (July-December 2021)
• Archive the forty-third (January-June 2022)
• Archive the forty-fourth (July-December 2022)
• Archive the forty-fifth (January-June 2023)
• Archive the forty-sixth (July-December 2023)

Die Zeit, die Tag und Jahre macht

Happy New Year

2024

Same location pictured as 2019. -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 22:07, 2 January 2024 (UTC) reply

On the Main page: the person who made the pictured festival possible -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 19:41, 16 January 2024 (UTC) reply

story · music · places

Today a friend's birthday, with related music and new vacation pics -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 22:42, 30 January 2024 (UTC) reply

The article Mamiku has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Can find no information on this town to demonstrate fulfilling WP:NGEO.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Tooncool64 ( talk) 05:17, 7 January 2024 (UTC) reply

A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 January 7 § Category:Roman Catholic cathedrals by country on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. – Aidan721 ( talk) 18:26, 7 January 2024 (UTC) reply

		The New Page Patroller's Barnstar
		For over 100 article reviews during 2023. Well done! Keep up the good work and thank you! Dr vulpes (Talk) 02:43, 10 January 2024 (UTC) reply

Category:Guatemalan musicians by century has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason ( talk) 21:42, 11 January 2024 (UTC) reply

In the 10 minutes from 17:50 to 17:59, you used AWB to manually move 384 entries from Category:20th-century American politicians to Category:20th-century American legislators, pressing enter at the rate of once every 1.5 seconds. Is there any reason that these edits were not marked as minor? There are bots that handle this, so why not let a bot do the mindless work? Alansohn ( talk) 23:15, 17 January 2024 (UTC) reply

@ Alansohn: I'm not aware of a bot that has been coded to do this specific task, and I can handle it myself with relative ease.

I have discovered over long years here that it doesn't seem to matter much whether or not I mark such edits as minor; I receive blowback from other editors either way. Myself, I don't view these as minor edits, necessarily, which is why I don't mark them as such. -- Ser Amantio di Nicolao ^{Che dicono a Signa?} _{Lo dicono a Signa.} 23:18, 17 January 2024 (UTC) reply

Hi Nicolao. There is a professional squash player in Sri Lanka with a world rank of 417 will be upgraded soon tomorrow. His name is Tuwin Osanda Herath. A national squash player from Sri Lanka who debuted his senior national squash career in May 2023 for Asian Championships. Would you mind doing an article about him on Wikipedia and make him a page?

Thank you! SquashDope ( talk) 22:56, 20 January 2024 (UTC) reply

The article Nalanda (7°40′N 80°38′E) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A duplicate of Nalanda, Sri Lanka, evidence gathered in Talk:Batagalla (7°15′N 80°40′E)#Requested move 4 January 2024

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Chanaka L ( talk) 15:57, 23 January 2024 (UTC) reply

I expanded the Nalanda, Sri Lanka article. Cheers! Chanaka L ( talk) 15:57, 23 January 2024 (UTC) reply

This morning I edited Lindsay McCaul. Can you correct?

I thought I was just adding a link but I did it WRONG. EVEN if the original link was a spam misspelling... the biography looks worse.

So I did NOT improve it. Please fix for me. Please 152.44.187.196 ( talk) 16:58, 23 January 2024 (UTC) reply

Thank you for sharing the poem by Polly Rupe on your user page. 46.123.251.53 ( talk) 10:29, 24 January 2024 (UTC) reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Schneider Crossroads, Virginia is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Schneider Crossroads, Virginia until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Waddles  🗩  🖉 22:08, 24 January 2024 (UTC) reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lost in the Game (film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lost in the Game (film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Epa101 ( talk) 13:44, 27 January 2024 (UTC) reply

Women in Red | February 2024, Volume 10, Issue 2, Numbers 293, 294, 297, 298 Online events: New: Alphabet run O & P | Black women Continuing: #1day1woman | Education (year-long initiative) Announcement Please let other wikiprojects know about our February Black women event. Tip of the month: AllAfrica can now be searched on the ProQuest tab at the WP Library. Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events and add any general ideas on developing the project. Follow us on social media: Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

-- Lajmmoore ( talk 20:10, 28 January 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging reply

A tag has been placed on Category:Madagascar Green Party politicians indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. ✗ plicit 12:08, 30 January 2024 (UTC) reply

Hello Ser Amantio Di Nicolao, I heard you were the most active user on Wikipedia and made the most edits ever to this website. I would like to thank you for making so many edits, its just amazing how much work you put into Wikipedia. PrincessJoey2024 ( talk) 17:03, 30 January 2024 (UTC) reply

The article Louse River has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

One small sentence of content. per WP:NATFEAT

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Packerfan386 beer here 12:02, 1 February 2024 (UTC) reply

A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 February 2 § Category:Zoos established in 1752 on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. – Aidan721 ( talk) 01:58, 2 February 2024 (UTC) reply

Noticed user 100.6.41.234 putting unsourced claims about new locations on the Skyline Chili Wikipedia. Went to their edit logs and noticed that the majority (if not all) of their numerous edits have been adding false information to various pages namely false claims that various celebrities such as T.J. Watt and Kenny Pickett are expecting children. A number of users have complained on their talk page about unsourced claims and misinformation in an attempt to resolve the issues to no avail. Sqorg ( talk) 03:17, 6 February 2024 (UTC) reply

story · music · places

Today I am happy about a singer on the Main page (at least for the first hours), after TFA the same day last year. -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 16:11, 7 February 2024 (UTC) reply

Thanks to Seiji Ozawa. -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 22:10, 12 February 2024 (UTC) reply

12 years precious ;) -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 10:24, 15 February 2024 (UTC) reply

The image, taken on a cemetery last year after the funeral of a distant but dear family member, commemorates today, with thanks for their achievements, four subjects mentioned on the Main page and Vami_IV, a friend here. Listen to music by Tchaikovsky (an article where one of the four is pictured), sung by today's subject (whose performance on stage I enjoyed two days ago). -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 16:48, 20 February 2024 (UTC) reply

Listen to music from Ukraine if you like, - I heard it in 2022, and the November concert (at a different church) raised a truckload of winter clothes. My story today is also from my life: I heard the singer in 3 of the 4 mentioned musical items. I sang in yesterday's. -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 10:36, 24 February 2024 (UTC) reply

more music and flowers on Rossini's rare birthday -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 15:21, 29 February 2024 (UTC) reply

Hi Ser Amantio di Nicolao! I am looking for a wiki expert to help with / guidance in some page cleanup for Amada Cruz. I am looking into bias/credibility of some of the listed information on this page, and adding in new information that is from recent press about this individual. I am wondering if you would be able to help me with navigating a successful edit for sections of this page. Thank you in advance! Cratedcube82 ( talk) 22:04, 7 February 2024 (UTC) reply

@ Cratedcube82: I'm sorry, but I tend to avoid biographies of living people most of the time; there are other editors better suited to navigate them than I. Apologies. -- Ser Amantio di Nicolao ^{Che dicono a Signa?} _{Lo dicono a Signa.} 00:50, 8 February 2024 (UTC) reply

@ Cratedcube82: Maybe try asking for assistance at Wikipedia:Teahouse.-- Commander Keane ( talk) 03:50, 8 February 2024 (UTC) reply

thank you! Cratedcube82 ( talk) 21:26, 26 February 2024 (UTC) reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shawn Jones (musician) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shawn Jones (musician) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

''Flux55'' ( talk) 17:12, 8 February 2024 (UTC) reply

A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 February 9 § Women foos on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. House Blaster ( talk · he/him) 02:48, 9 February 2024 (UTC) reply

Hey, I am just curious. I was looking at the unsourced backlog, I see X (automobile), I didn't really see anything online. I'm just curious where you got the info for it? Certainly presents a problem for googling with the very generic name. Somehow since 2006 its only received maintenace edits, lol. Kind of interesting ForksForks ( talk) 13:53, 15 February 2024 (UTC) reply

@ ForksForks: Yes: it would have been sourced from David Burgess Wise. Surprised I didn't include a source, even at that early date. Thanks for the reminder - when I have a moment I'll have to find the book and add something in.-- Ser Amantio di Nicolao ^{Che dicono a Signa?} _{Lo dicono a Signa.} 13:56, 15 February 2024 (UTC) reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Oskeladden Rock is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oskeladden Rock until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

JMWt ( talk) 16:35, 15 February 2024 (UTC) reply

Thanks for all the good stuff you do on this project! HouseOfChange ( talk) 23:10, 15 February 2024 (UTC) reply

@ HouseOfChange: Jeez - I never realized I said anything worth listening to in the first place. Thanks a.) for the tip, and b.) for reminding me that I should get more involved over at Wikiquote as I've been meaning to do. -- Ser Amantio di Nicolao ^{Che dicono a Signa?} _{Lo dicono a Signa.} 23:32, 15 February 2024 (UTC) reply

Come on over, we'd be so honored to have you! Lots to do and so much variety. Today I have been working on humanizing and improving WQ articles for Raquel Welch and Mamie Van Doren, just for example. HouseOfChange ( talk) 23:41, 15 February 2024 (UTC) reply

@ HouseOfChange: I have a copy of David Ewen's American Composers: A Biographical Dictionary that I've been meaning to mine for some quotes - he appends a quote by the relevant composer to nearly every entry in the book. It'll take some time to transcribe them, which is why I've been holding off - I'm lazy. :-) But I'm sure there are some folks there that currently don't have entries on Wikiquote. I have a project or two ahead of them, but I might try to get on it this weekend - at the very least I can work on some of the women composers like Marion Bauer and Amy Beach. -- Ser Amantio di Nicolao ^{Che dicono a Signa?} _{Lo dicono a Signa.} 01:07, 16 February 2024 (UTC) reply

In this edit on February 10 you changed Category:21st-century American politicians to Category:21st-century American legislators and then in this edit on February 14 you added Category:21st-century New Jersey politicians back in. Am I missing something in why the politicians category was changed and then reinserted? Alansohn ( talk) 02:33, 16 February 2024 (UTC) reply

@ Alansohn: It wasn't reinserted, though - a more refined version was inserted. Both categories are an attempt to deal with the bloat that has affected Category:21st-century American politicians. One is admittedly more successful than the other, but it's an ongoing process of refinement. -- Ser Amantio di Nicolao ^{Che dicono a Signa?} _{Lo dicono a Signa.} 05:12, 16 February 2024 (UTC) reply

A tag has been placed on Category:I-Kiribati poets indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:11, 16 February 2024 (UTC) reply

A tag has been placed on Category:Kiribati poetry indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:50, 16 February 2024 (UTC) reply

I saw you added some info about this artist so I came here to see if you knew a great deal about him but it appears you know lots about a lot of stuff given your contributions to wiki. I am just a normal guy who likes odd things and picked up what I believe to be an original or at the least signed piece of this guys art, so trying to expand my research on him and his works of art Thanks for contributions to wiki Derek Beals 2601:300:4002:A7C0:7130:FABD:D8FD:DD3B ( talk) 03:53, 19 February 2024 (UTC) reply

Hello, may I ask for the above article to be semi-protected due to unregistered editors changing his nationality from N. Irish to Irish, in contravention of policies regarding people from N. Ireland? See Rhys McClenaghan, for instance, another Irish Olympian from N. Ireland. Thank you Billsmith60 ( talk) 09:29, 19 February 2024 (UTC) reply

Dear friend, may I repeat my request to prevent changes that contravene Wikipedia policies?

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daniel_Wiffen

Thank you Billsmith60 ( talk) 10:14, 22 February 2024 (UTC) reply

@ Billsmith60: This is not a subject with which I'm particularly familiar; I would recommend looking for an administrator with interest either in Irish topics or in sports. -- Ser Amantio di Nicolao ^{Che dicono a Signa?} _{Lo dicono a Signa.} 04:46, 23 February 2024 (UTC) reply

John DiMaio is an example of one of hundreds of articles where you deleted Category:20th-century American politicians (or similar categories) in this edit today, without any explanation. Why are they being removed now? Alansohn ( talk) 03:49, 22 February 2024 (UTC) reply

@ Alansohn: Because the category is now redundant; any article that I removed is in one of its subcategories now. -- Ser Amantio di Nicolao ^{Che dicono a Signa?} _{Lo dicono a Signa.} 06:55, 22 February 2024 (UTC) reply

A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 February 24 § Category:Assassinated journalists on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. House Blaster ( talk · he/him) 20:13, 24 February 2024 (UTC) reply

Mingo was not platted due to coal mining. It came about due to the Chicago Great Western Railroad needing a water stop after Valeria, Iowa. The beginning of Mingo was the end of Greencastle, Iowa since the railroad missed Greencastle by 2 miles. 75.117.225.206 ( talk) 03:12, 25 February 2024 (UTC) reply

Women in Red | March 2024, Volume 10, Issue 3, Numbers 293, 294, 299, 300, 301 Online events: New: Alphabet run Q & R | Art+Feminism | Find Her Continuing: #1day1woman | Education (year-long initiative) Announcements Celebrate Women – All content gender gap events, in every language Wikipedia, in March 2024 Francophone Women★ Writers Fortnight 2024 Feminism and Folklore 2024 Writing Contest Tip of the month: When creating a new article, check various spellings, including birth name, married names and pseudonyms, to be sure an article doesn't already exist. Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events and add any general ideas on developing the project. Follow us on social media: Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

-- Lajmmoore ( talk 20:23, 25 February 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging reply

Is Hadja Maffire Bangura the same person as Mafory Bangoura? From history, appears you are creator of former, which is subject of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hadja Maffire Bangura. Can you help clarify? Thanks. Djflem ( talk) 17:59, 29 February 2024 (UTC) reply

See [ Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hadja Maffire Bangura#Hadja Maffire Bangura].

I apologize that I did not think to check who created the article to see if they were still active on Wikipedia and to notify you of the AFD.

Yours. Nirva20 ( talk) 18:13, 29 February 2024 (UTC) reply

These recently added categories appear to be missing:

• Category:19th-century Missouri politicians
• Category:20th-century Missouri politicians

Example of additions: [1] [2]

Mitch Ames ( talk) 06:28, 1 March 2024 (UTC) reply

@ Mitch Ames: Yep, creating them now. Going a little backwards tonight. -- Ser Amantio di Nicolao ^{Che dicono a Signa?} _{Lo dicono a Signa.} 06:30, 1 March 2024 (UTC)Cite error: There are <ref> tags on this page without content in them (see the help page). reply

The redirect Koit (ajaleht) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 4 § Koit (ajaleht) until a consensus is reached. Estopedist1 ( talk) 12:23, 4 March 2024 (UTC) reply

The allegations from Marjorie Taylor Greene about assault by Rich McCormick are completely unsubstantiated. However, elements associated with her campaign continue to graffiti this wiki entry with these false allegations. Can you please lock the page for edits? Jbsimpson81 ( talk) 20:05, 6 March 2024 (UTC) reply

@ Jbsimpson81: Right now I don't see a sufficient level of vandalism for the article to require protection. If there are repeated attempts to add information, that would be a different story. -- Ser Amantio di Nicolao ^{Che dicono a Signa?} _{Lo dicono a Signa.} 20:11, 6 March 2024 (UTC) reply

A tag has been placed on Category:Kyrgyzstani educators indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:43, 10 March 2024 (UTC) reply

Did you intentionally add the nbsp's in this edit? If not, do you know why they appeared? -- Gimmethegepgun ( talk) 05:15, 11 March 2024 (UTC) reply

@ Gimmethegepgun: Not a clue, sorry - I didn't add them deliberately. I only changed the one word. -- Ser Amantio di Nicolao ^{Che dicono a Signa?} _{Lo dicono a Signa.} 05:56, 11 March 2024 (UTC) reply

Hello. Your recent creations of file talk pages are a task better-suited for a bot, and the rate at which you are performing them (e.g. 64 edits in one minute here) indicates that you are not reviewing individual edits manually and are therefore required to seek approval from the Bot Approvals Group under the bot policy. Please file a bot approval request if you wish to proceed with the task. Regards, Sdkb  ^talk 10:45, 11 March 2024 (UTC) reply

@ Sdkb: Apologies - the speed does get away from me from time to time. I'll redouble my efforts to slow down. -- Ser Amantio di Nicolao ^{Che dicono a Signa?} _{Lo dicono a Signa.} 04:16, 12 March 2024 (UTC) reply

The point is not that you should be reviewing each individual edit, since those edits should be automatable. This task is so low-value anyways that reviewing manually would be an absurd use of time. The point is that the batch as a whole should have the normal proper scrutiny, and should be done with a bot flag to reduce watchlist clutter for the (not me, but many other) editors who filter out bot edits.

Also, this is very far from an isolated moment as your reply implies. Every other editor who does the type of work you do does it through the proper channel, which is running a bot. It is long past time for you to get on board. Courtesy pinging @ BAG: for their input. Sdkb  ^talk 15:15, 12 March 2024 (UTC) reply

I'll be completely honest, if it were up to me I would have blocked Ser Amantio years ago for doing exactly the same thing that has gotten a dozen other editors blocked (mass-editing with an unflagged bot account). However, no one seems to care that Ser Amantio is running an unauthorised bot account and has reached the super-mario "net positive" levels where I doubt a unilateral block would actually stick. Primefac ( talk) 17:44, 12 March 2024 (UTC) reply

The article M. Laurance Morse has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

fails to meet notability guidelines for people – sparse sources with insignificant coverage (i.e. 2 books that mention him briefly on one page)

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Irltoad ( talk) 22:46, 11 March 2024 (UTC) reply

Hi Ser Amatio, I just have a question. On the Maria Voce‎ article, you switched the category from "21st century women lawyers" to the general "21st-century lawyers" category. Can I ask why that was please? Was there a decision to get rid of that gendered category? The C of E God Save the King! ( talk) 10:16, 13 March 2024 (UTC) reply

@ The C of E: The "women lawyer" categories are non-diffusing, so articles that are in those categories should be in their parents as well. They should be in both simultaneously. -- Ser Amantio di Nicolao ^{Che dicono a Signa?} _{Lo dicono a Signa.} 17:33, 13 March 2024 (UTC) reply

I noticed on John P. Ordway some changes in the categories, and I wanted a clarification from you, since you seem to be the one swapping these categories around with a plan in mind. The "legislator" category has a description at the top that says that it is for people "primarily" known for their legislative post. If this is true, I think I will remove it from Ordway's article, I think he is primarily known as a composer and music publisher. As a aside, I see the "politician" category does not have a description at the top. It seems to me that virtually all categories should have some sort of description, to avoid people having false ideas about what to include. Regards, 16:07, 15 March 2024 (UTC) Brianyoumans ( talk) 16:07, 15 March 2024 (UTC) reply

@ Brianyoumans: Personally, I wouldn't remove the category from Ordway's article. He was a legislator, even if it wasn't the only thing he was known for, and it's an important enough part of his life that I think it ought to be included in the category tree. As to the other point, I believe there are a fair number of categories without descriptions in them; that being said, I might chew over some verbiage for the category when I have a moment, because I can think of one or two things that might be worth saying. You're welcome to put something there yourself as well, of course...I won't have much time this weekend. -- Ser Amantio di Nicolao ^{Che dicono a Signa?} _{Lo dicono a Signa.} 06:02, 16 March 2024 (UTC) reply

If we want the categories to consist of anyone who was a legislator, it seems to me the word "primarily" should come out. Brianyoumans ( talk) 16:06, 16 March 2024 (UTC) reply

@ Brianyoumans: I would have no objection, not having chosen that wording in the first place. It might be worth asking the category creator for input. -- Ser Amantio di Nicolao ^{Che dicono a Signa?} _{Lo dicono a Signa.} 16:21, 16 March 2024 (UTC) reply

Will do. Brianyoumans ( talk) 22:58, 16 March 2024 (UTC) reply

especially if their not family ly MAyers79 ( talk) 01:25, 16 March 2024 (UTC) reply

especially if I am being harassed by a company from mental health MAyers79 ( talk) 01:27, 16 March 2024 (UTC) reply

Hi,

At some point you had added the image of J. C. Seaman Jr. in the infobox in the J. C. Seaman article. You had asked "any reason why this isn't in the infobox?" The obvious reason is that the image that was in the infobox was of J. C. Jr. in 1970 and J. C. Sr., who the article is about, died in 1964. The article is now without a picture and that's because I had to get it out of the infobox asap to avoid further confusion regarding the person of J. C. Sr. Commonssense ( talk) 11:25, 19 March 2024 (UTC) reply

In this edit, and others, you've removed the "uncertain birth date" cat because there's also a specific birth year cat. But in this case the text says "Major Thomas Pearson (c. 1740?–1781)" (an interesting double layer of uncertainty?), and the two accessible sources both say "about 1740". How do you decide which of the incompatible categories is incorrect? Pam D 08:08, 29 March 2024 (UTC) reply

And here the source says "born by 1517", not the same as "born 1517" but more of a {{ fl.}}. Pam D 08:10, 29 March 2024 (UTC) reply

Similarly, I have an edit here where a user added findagrave as a source to make at least a minimal effort at finding a birth date and kept the flag uncertain birth, and then you subsequently removed the uncertain birth category. I'm not sure it's wrong for both categories to exist simultaneously (uncertain birth and xxxx births]]. -- Engineerchange ( talk) 10:03, 29 March 2024 (UTC) reply

[Redundant intro since I didn't notice the above section:] Hi. I haven't seen it documented that this maintenance category shouldn't be placed in articles where year-of-birth categories are also used. Maybe some instructions should be given on the category page on how it should be used, unless it's already somewhere and I missed it.

Anyway, for this specific case, the article does note that sources give two different birth years, which aren't even in the same century. It clearly wouldn't be a good idea to change the YOB category to Category:2nd-millennium births; do you perhaps have a suggestion how should the article should be categorised to reflect the discrepancy? -- Paul_012 ( talk) 15:57, 29 March 2024 (UTC) reply

PamD, Engineerchange, and Paul_012: I defaulted to the by-year category when running a cleanup like this because it tells me that someone has put eyes on the article and chosen that. There were 1930 articles in the batch when I began cleanup...I don't think they've been looked at for a while. Compounding the issue is that Category:Year of birth missing is an invisible category, and I don't know how many editors are aware of those without a little poking around. (I know I wasn't, way back when...I think I must have discovered it when adding categories to another article.)

I do disagree that "uncertain births" and "xxxx births" ought to exist on the same article, because for births that are truly uncertain we have the by-decade and by-century categories (I agree with Paul_012 about categorizing people by millennium...I've seen it done with ancient figures, but not editing much in the realm of ancient history myself I have no opinion as to its utility there.) My practice, when writing an article about someone with an uncertain year of birth, has simply been to leave that category blank. Best case, use a by-decade category if that seems likely. Choosing a by-year category is a definitive statement, and that's the problem to me...an editor is saying, "no, it's not uncertain...this is the certainty I choose".

(Also compounding the issue: I think there are times when people are choosing Category:Year of birth uncertain when Category:Date of birth uncertain is a superior choice. I've had discussion at times in the past with one or two editors about which is proper when.)

I'm going to be in and out all day (I do have an off-wiki social life once in a while, contrary to what some people may believe)...I have an idea for a possible fix to at least some part of this issue, but I want to chew it over a bit more before making it public. -- Ser Amantio di Nicolao ^{Che dicono a Signa?} _{Lo dicono a Signa.} 16:51, 30 March 2024 (UTC) reply

The decade etc cats are sometimes useful, sometimes not: one of the examples was born "about 1800" so has uncertain century, decade and year! It's not wasy to see a solution. Pam D 21:15, 30 March 2024 (UTC) reply

@ PamD: I agree, and frankly I don't use them much - I just leave the article without a birth-year category.

I'm wondering (adding Engineerchange and Paul_012 into the discussion): would it be possible to create something like Category:Wikipedia non-empty soft redirected categories, but for articles with the kind of contradiction we're discussing? Maybe two: one for categories in Category:Year of birth uncertain which have had a birth-year category added, and one for Category:Year of birth unknown that's the same? I can see several advantages; 1.) it would channel those articles into a category that could be reviewed manually every so often (so that hopefully we don't end up with 1900+ articles having that issue again), and 2.) if it provides an alert in the body of the article it could possibly alert new editors to the fact that the invisible categories exist. Think that might solve the issue? It won't take care of all of it, but it will take care of much of it, I think. -- Ser Amantio di Nicolao ^{Che dicono a Signa?} _{Lo dicono a Signa.} 05:03, 31 March 2024 (UTC) reply

Just to add, there's perhaps a parallel problem on deaths? Pam D 06:10, 31 March 2024 (UTC) reply

Just leaving out the categories in uncertain cases would at least be logically consistent, but it probably needs wider discussion somewhere. The problem lies mainly in cases where the uncertainty spans more than one decade (or century). There needs to be consensus on what to do with them first for an automated tracking category to be useful. -- Paul_012 ( talk) 10:00, 31 March 2024 (UTC) reply

I agree that there should be a consensus outside of this talk page to move forward on these proposals. On the topic, I think Category:Year of birth unknown vs. Category:Year of birth missing are fairly well documented, though the descriptions are cumbersome; i.e., if the person was born before/flourished prior to 1850, you sort into unknown and if after that period, you sort into missing. You have to read paragraphs to get to that point. The description for Category:Year of birth uncertain is vague: "contains individuals whose year of birth is uncertain or disputed." I have often added people in a decade birth category and then categorized as uncertain because the age at death could put them in one of two years in the same decade (or two competing ages of death could put in one of 4 years...) because by definition that is uncertain. If in one of two decades, I mark as uncertain only. I'm generally fine with the proposal, but the description on that category page should have clear examples to make it obvious to the user what is expected. -- Engineerchange ( talk) 13:54, 31 March 2024 (UTC) reply

Engineerchange and Paul_012: I didn't mean to imply that my suggestion was final; I merely offer it as a starting point, and as something somewhat half-formed from the recesses of my mind. I'm certainly not opposed to further discussion, although I'm not sure that I have the energy to lead said discussion right now. (I haven't really had the energy to lead such a discussion for a while, to be honest, but of that the less said the better.)

@ PamD: Let me run a quick PetScan search when I have a moment...that should tell me what numbers we'd be dealing with there. (I'm hoping fewer, but we shall see.) -- Ser Amantio di Nicolao ^{Che dicono a Signa?} _{Lo dicono a Signa.} 04:34, 1 April 2024 (UTC) reply

A tag has been placed on Category:2006 in the Falkland Islands indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:01, 30 March 2024 (UTC) reply

Women in Red | April 2024, Volume 10, Issue 4, Numbers 293, 294, 302, 303, 304 Online events: New: Alphabet run S & T | Gender studies | Health Continuing: #1day1woman | Education (year-long initiative) Announcements The second round of "One biography a week" begins in April as part of #1day1woman. Tip of the month: If you run into technical problems, you might find help on our Tools and technical support page Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events and add any general ideas on developing the project. Follow us on social media: Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

-- Lajmmoore ( talk 19:43, 30 March 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging reply

story · music · places

Bach music for Easter! -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 20:57, 31 March 2024 (UTC) reply

Master of the categories, I just looked at what has accumulated for Graham Waterhouse. Can you sort them out, nationality being the key? He is - as of a few years ago (after Brexit), not only English but also a German citizen. -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 07:42, 3 April 2024 (UTC) reply

@ Gerda Arendt: There's no mention of that in the article, I'm afraid - if you add it in I'll sort out the categories. Is he a dual citizen, then? -- Ser Amantio di Nicolao ^{Che dicono a Signa?} _{Lo dicono a Signa.} 05:38, 4 April 2024 (UTC) reply

He is a dual citizen. I am his friend and know, about these things such as language tests and knowing the constitution to acquire it. As my user page says: "the only real nation is humanity". In music, is it important which nationality the composer has? The article doesn't mention that he is English, just that he is born in London. For my taste, all these nationality-based cats could go with no harm. But if they stay they should be correct. What is an "expatriate", actually? - Do I have a RS for him having a German passport? No. An English? No. - Back to music ;) -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 06:39, 4 April 2024 (UTC) reply

@ Gerda Arendt: I mean, I'm not opposed to tinkering with the categories. I trust you. :-) But if they aren't supported by the text of the article then there may be problems, especially given that it's a BLP. I don't much think so, given how niche classical music is, but I do want to make sure that's clear.

I'll have a look tomorrow night, then, once I'm not pressed for time. -- Ser Amantio di Nicolao ^{Che dicono a Signa?} _{Lo dicono a Signa.} 04:33, 5 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Don't waste time, though, - I want to learn. Strictly speaking, when no text provides any nationality, there should be no category with a nationality, - just composer - cellist - person from London, - right? -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 06:17, 5 April 2024 (UTC) reply

@ Gerda Arendt: If no text provides any nationality? Then yes, most likely there will be no categorization by country. That said...if the birthplace is included, then people may run with it.

Having said that...I can't think of an instance where I've seen a person's birthplace mentioned when nationality wasn't. It just tends to be one of those things people expect to see in an encyclopedia article. -- Ser Amantio di Nicolao ^{Che dicono a Signa?} _{Lo dicono a Signa.} 04:23, 8 April 2024 (UTC) reply

I've seen the opposite: "don't mention nationality in an infobox when it can be inferred from the birthplace". So I never fill nationality, and never add these nationality categories, but others do, and I haven't reverted. Back to the beginning: we have no RS to say that he is also German, so how could that me mentioned? -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 05:27, 8 April 2024 (UTC) reply

@ Gerda Arendt: There's no record of it anywhere online, even some sort of database? If that's really the case, all I can think would be to alter the lead of the article and call him, say, British/German. But as it's a BLP that still may present challenges. -- Ser Amantio di Nicolao ^{Che dicono a Signa?} _{Lo dicono a Signa.} 04:43, 9 April 2024 (UTC) reply

story · music · places

I like to see Appalachian Spring on the Main page today (not by me, just interested and reviewed), and I also made it my story. - How do you like the statue (look up places)? - I was undecided so show three versions ;) -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 16:39, 6 April 2024 (UTC) reply

@ Gerda Arendt: Which, the statue of Hildegarde? Not bad, though I feel compelled to say that her music is not to my taste, I'm afraid. Speaking of Shakers, that's what my choir is working on for our next concert...Shaker music. More to come on that... -- Ser Amantio di Nicolao ^{Che dicono a Signa?} _{Lo dicono a Signa.} 04:28, 8 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Interesting! - Our next concert - soon - will be Bach cantatas, with that famous tenor I pointed out in March. - Today I see Marian Anderson as my top story (by NBC, 1939), and below (on my talk) three people with raised arms, - and the place is the cherry blossom in Frauenstein. -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 16:44, 9 April 2024 (UTC) reply

plum tree blossom for Kalevi Kiviniemi in the snow - see my talk -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 21:08, 11 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Another category question for you expert: Bleib bei uns, denn es will Abend werden, BWV 6 has to to with the Road to Emmaus appearance but that has no category (yet). There's one for Paintings of the Supper at Emmaus, but this is not a painting nor of the supper. -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 14:50, 21 April 2024 (UTC) reply

@ Gerda Arendt: Sorry, was out all day Sunday. ( Florencia en el Amazonas at the University of Maryland.) I'm not sure it would be useful to categorize the cantata by subject. It might be possible to create a parent category for the Gospel story, and put it in there...but it doesn't look like we do that with other stories, as far as I can tell. Except maybe for one or two of the major ones. I see it's categorized as Category:Music for Easter, which is probably sufficient. -- Ser Amantio di Nicolao ^{Che dicono a Signa?} _{Lo dicono a Signa.} 21:43, 23 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Thank you! - today a sad task - memory of Andrew Davis - turned into entertainment (yt at the bottom of his article, actually both) -- the latest pictures capture extreme weather -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 21:58, 23 April 2024 (UTC) reply

@ Gerda Arendt: Indeed. I don't believe I ever had occasion to hear him live - I don't know that he appeared much around here, if at all - but he was the conductor of that magnificent Makropulos from Glyndebourne that was my introduction to the piece, lo these many years ago. -- Ser Amantio di Nicolao ^{Che dicono a Signa?} _{Lo dicono a Signa.} 05:19, 24 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Hi Ser Amantio de Nicolae I have some questions regarding your editing process. I often struggle with communication so I hope this message is received kindly. I'm keen to understand how you have been responsible for so many Wikipedia edits? I'm struggling with mirroring in all of its forms. I am concerned that there's an element of whimsey and perhaps plagiarism in your edits. if you are jumping from one subject to another do you fall down worm holes and forget to credit previous writers or researchers? I would like to understand your values if you feel able to share these?. I moved from a small town to a big City but unlike you I stayed in my nations capital, moving back 24 years later. It was terrible and I've never felt so unheard Is there an element of wanting people to hear you in your writing for Wikipedia?

I realise these are chunky questions but might benefit from your thoughts.

Best Wishes Steven 82.69.107.230 ( talk) 01:41, 1 April 2024 (UTC) reply

@ 82.69.107.230: The vast majority of my edits are small, category changes and the like. It's relatively easy to do a large number in a short amount of time. Factor in that I've had this account now for over eighteen years, and that means I've had a lot of time to build up my edit count. Simple as that. -- Ser Amantio di Nicolao ^{Che dicono a Signa?} _{Lo dicono a Signa.} 04:42, 1 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Hello. Dear brother, I want to publish a wikipedia page about a famous writer. I could only make a draft and could not make the main page. Please help me brother. This is the link to the writer draft: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Rakan_Daqar

The redirect Cantarinho River has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 3 § Cantarinho River until a consensus is reached. Shhhnotsoloud ( talk) 14:07, 3 April 2024 (UTC) reply

The redirect Escondido River (Brazil) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 3 § Escondido River (Brazil) until a consensus is reached. Shhhnotsoloud ( talk) 14:08, 3 April 2024 (UTC) reply

The redirect São João River (Verde River tributary) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 3 § São João River (Verde River tributary) until a consensus is reached. Shhhnotsoloud ( talk) 14:09, 3 April 2024 (UTC) reply

The redirect Mequéns River (São João River tributary) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 3 § Mequéns River (São João River tributary) until a consensus is reached. Shhhnotsoloud ( talk) 14:12, 3 April 2024 (UTC) reply

The redirect Mequéns River (Guaporé River tributary) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 3 § Mequéns River (Guaporé River tributary) until a consensus is reached. Shhhnotsoloud ( talk) 14:12, 3 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Hi User:Ser_Amantio_di_Nicolao, would you consider this link as valuable proof of Ravetz's birthdate? https://podcasts.ox.ac.uk/series/science-post-normal-perspectives-jerry-ravetz-90

It is about the celebration of Ravetz's 90th birthday in Oxford which was in May 2019.

His birth year is also here: https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q6182884 backed up by three sources. If this does not satisfy you would you consider leaving just the year 1929? Thanks for your help and best regards Andrea Saltelli Saltean ( talk) 07:14, 9 April 2024 (UTC) reply

@ Saltean: If the source seems legitimate to you, you can go ahead and make the requisite changes to the article. No need for my input. -- Ser Amantio di Nicolao ^{Che dicono a Signa?} _{Lo dicono a Signa.} 04:43, 11 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Thanks! Andrea Saltelli Saltean ( talk) 06:38, 11 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Was wondering why you removed this article from the Category:Disasters in Texas with this edit. Thanks, Shearonink ( talk) 03:50, 11 April 2024 (UTC) reply

@ Shearonink: The article is now in the subcategory Category:Fires in Texas. -- Ser Amantio di Nicolao ^{Che dicono a Signa?} _{Lo dicono a Signa.} 04:42, 11 April 2024 (UTC) reply

A tag has been placed on Category:Tokelau at the Commonwealth Games indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:16, 12 April 2024 (UTC) reply

The article Smith & Dowse has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Could not find any reliable sources about subject company. Fails WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Liu1126 ( talk) 22:51, 14 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Hey, on the page Dhruv Tara - Samay Sadi Se Pare, a user called Someonewhoisusinginternet is making unnecessary edits. The user is riverting every other edit made by any other user even if the edit is right. The user is not letting others correct the wrong information in the article. He just want to write what he wants. I want you to take a action about it. SuperWriter23 ( talk) 00:20, 16 April 2024 (UTC) reply

I am requesting a review of an article in my sandbox: /info/en/?search=User:Gaw54/sandbox The subject of the article is the artist Bonnie Rychlak, who has exhibited with Jeanne Silverthorne. I would appreciate any feedback and assistance with moving this along in the process for publication. Thank you. Gaw54 ( talk) 04:51, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article A Figa is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A Figa until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Boleyn ( talk) 10:44, 21 April 2024 (UTC) reply

The article X (automobile) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG, does not have significant coverage from secondary sources. The one source given only says "X (France) (1908-1909)" and other sources aren't forthcoming.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. StreetcarEnjoyer (talk) 17:55, 21 April 2024 (UTC) reply

The article Deborah Adler has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

does not meet notability requirements

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot ( talk) 10:00, 23 April 2024 (UTC) reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article X (automobile) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/X (automobile) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

StreetcarEnjoyer (talk) 21:25, 26 April 2024 (UTC) reply