Hello, I'm Lynch44. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to 1900 in film have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Lynch44 ( talk) 10:00, 16 May 2024 (UTC) reply

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at NBC. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Lynch44 ( talk) 10:05, 16 May 2024 (UTC) reply

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Nokia, you may be blocked from editing. Sjö ( talk) 10:52, 16 May 2024 (UTC) reply

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Pro Evolution Soccer. Sjö ( talk) 10:56, 16 May 2024 (UTC) reply

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.   ScottishFinnishRadish ( talk) 13:38, 16 May 2024 (UTC) reply

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

2409:4050:2E3F:C36A:0:0:4E48:D104 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))

---

Request reason:

ÑO VIOLƏTION 2409:4050:2E3F:C36A:0:0:4E48:D104 ( talk) 14:00, 16 May 2024 (UTC) reply

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla ( talk) 14:02, 16 May 2024 (UTC) reply

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

2409:4050:2E3F:C36A:0:0:4E48:D104 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))

---

Request reason:

ÑÒ VIOLATION I WILL NEVER DO EDITING TESTS 2409:4050:2E3F:C36A:0:0:4E48:D104 ( talk) 04:17, 17 May 2024 (UTC) reply

Decline reason:

This doesn't tell us what you will do. 331dot ( talk) 07:34, 17 May 2024 (UTC) reply

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.