From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< January 19
January 21 >

January 20

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on January 20, 2024.

Stevens-Johnson-Fuchs-Syndrome

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 January 28#Stevens-Johnson-Fuchs-Syndrome

Coquille (engineering)

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 January 28#Coquille (engineering)

Bakridamae

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 00:21, 28 January 2024 (UTC) reply

Huh? * Pppery * it has begun... 23:09, 20 January 2024 (UTC) reply

  • According to the page history, the target is the Chinese/Hangul equivalent for the title of the page, which is in Korean. However, Wiktionary doesn't have a Korean entry for this either. Delete per annadaana. Aaron Liu ( talk) 01:01, 21 January 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Delete as the current target is a related but different phrase, and the correct target wikt:薄利多賣 doesn't exist. The last character of the current target is read so not mae. 59.149.117.119 ( talk) 13:09, 21 January 2024 (UTC) reply
    The target is the Chinese translation Aaron Liu ( talk) 14:09, 21 January 2024 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Legacy number

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 00:22, 28 January 2024 (UTC) reply

Huh?. * Pppery * it has begun... 23:09, 20 January 2024 (UTC) reply

  • Delete. A legacy number or legacy identifier means a number no longer in use (for a document, for example) was added to Wikt for this, but removed in 2017. Hyphenation Expert ( talk) 02:06, 21 January 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Delete. There seems to a be a specific use in relation to England women's international footballers, the numbers are mentioned on several biographies and List of England women's international footballers states with a source that Legacy numbers were introduced in November 2022 to mark the 50th anniversary of an official England women's team., but nowhere that I've found is there any encyclopaedic information that would help someone wanting to know more about them (as best I can tell a legacy number of e.g. 181 just means that Lucy Bronze was the 181st person to play for England Women). Thryduulf ( talk) 14:46, 22 January 2024 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Annadaana

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 January 28#Annadaana

Defensive alliance

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 January 28#Defensive alliance

Purugu

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 00:22, 28 January 2024 (UTC) reply

Huh? * Pppery * it has begun... 23:09, 20 January 2024 (UTC) reply

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Kekemapa

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 00:22, 28 January 2024 (UTC) reply

A misspelling of a Hawiaan word does not deserve a redirect on the English Wikipedia. * Pppery * it has begun... 23:09, 20 January 2024 (UTC) reply

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

ILYM

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 January 29#ILYM

Bonaparte's Retreat (Disambiguation)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 00:23, 28 January 2024 (UTC) reply

Delete per WP:RDAB due to the "D" in "Disambiguation" being capitalized. Steel1943 ( talk) 23:04, 20 January 2024 (UTC) reply

Can't we WP:R3 this? Speedy delete Aaron Liu ( talk) 01:04, 21 January 2024 (UTC) reply
The redirect is not recently created, and I'm not sure I'd call it implausible either. -- Tamzin[ cetacean needed ( they|xe) 09:25, 21 January 2024 (UTC) reply
Whoops, I meant to put this down in the Islamic Resistance in Iraq page. That doesn't seem to be recently created either, unfortunately Aaron Liu ( talk) 19:21, 21 January 2024 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

2023 Israel–Hamas war/casualty

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy delete. CSD G7 Liz Read! Talk! 08:21, 21 January 2024 (UTC) reply

Unhelpful cross-namespace redirect. InfiniteNexus ( talk) 23:01, 20 January 2024 (UTC) reply

As author, fine to delete. ~ 🦝 Shushugah (he/him •  talk) 23:27, 20 January 2024 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Islamic Resistance in Iraq (Disambiguation)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 00:23, 28 January 2024 (UTC) reply

Delete per WP:RDAB due to the "D" in "Disambiguation" being capitalized. Steel1943 ( talk) 22:56, 20 January 2024 (UTC) reply

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Islamic Resistance in Iraq (Disambiguation )

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. WP:SNOW/ WP:NOTBURO. -- Joy ( talk) 21:16, 27 January 2024 (UTC) reply

Delete per WP:RDAB due to both space at the end of the disambiguator and the "D" in "Disambiguation" being capitalized. Steel1943 ( talk) 22:51, 20 January 2024 (UTC) reply

  • Delete. Shouldn't the D in the target page be lowercase in the first place? Aaron Liu ( talk) 22:52, 20 January 2024 (UTC) reply
    @ Aaron Liu: That issue has now been resolved. Steel1943 ( talk) 22:55, 20 January 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Delete its not clear if there ever was a DAB here. Crouch, Swale ( talk) 18:16, 21 January 2024 (UTC) reply
    @ Crouch, Swale: The target page was at this title for less than a minute. Steel1943 ( talk) 15:55, 22 January 2024 (UTC) reply
    Thanks, I wasn't sure as there were a number of moves and looking at the history and logs I couldn't work out how long it has been a non-redirect. Crouch, Swale ( talk) 20:41, 22 January 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Delete per nom. InfiniteNexus ( talk) 19:25, 21 January 2024 (UTC) reply
  • The extra space there is clearly a typo, this is barely worth a discussion, WP:SNOW anyone? :) -- Joy ( talk) 09:02, 26 January 2024 (UTC) reply
    You’d probably want to ping an admin. Also, I tried to argue R3 above but apparently this wasn’t recently created Aaron Liu ( talk) 12:54, 26 January 2024 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Seed Money

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 February 2#Seed Money

Sharafutdinov

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was setindexify. (non-admin closure) Duckmather ( talk) 22:53, 28 January 2024 (UTC) reply

Seems to refer to Marat Sharafutdinov, but this is simply a surname and could just as easily refer to people such as Dmitrii Sharafutdinov or Maxim Sharafutdinov. I don't think the name is notable enough to exist as a disambiguation page. ~ Eejit43 ( talk) 22:25, 20 January 2024 (UTC) reply

  • Delete: Not a worthy redirect. - UtherSRG (talk) 01:05, 21 January 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Delete or possibly disambiguate for all people with that surname; leaning towards delete per the above. -- GnocchiFan ( talk) 21:58, 21 January 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Since we already have two people documented under the same surname, and a simple search already shows references to others as well, just disambiguate it. (The draft took me 10 seconds with the new {{ anbl}} template, yay.) -- Joy ( talk) 09:03, 26 January 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Disambiguate per Joy, using the draft they've already created. CycloneYoris talk! 04:09, 28 January 2024 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Early European population statistics and censuses

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was no consensus, restore article. No consensus to delete, restore as the most conservative option. No prejudice against AfD. (non-admin closure) Queen of Hearts 04:21, 7 February 2024 (UTC) reply
Aaand deleted as copyvio. Queen of Hearts 03:12, 8 February 2024 (UTC) reply

The redirect has good amount of issues. For one, it is unclear what "Early European" means, considering the target does not define it and Early European does not exist. Thus, the subject of this redirect seems to not be defined in the target article. Lastly, there could be an WP:XY issue since Population statistics and Census are two separate articles. Lastly ... however, this redirect is a {{ R with history}} as the result of a WP:BLAR in 2010. Steel1943 ( talk) 01:42, 8 December 2023 (UTC) reply

  • Comment skim-reading that old content, it looks like an essay about this history of demography in Europe so I think the nom is bracketing the title wrong - it's (Early) (European population statistics and censuses) rather than (Early European) (population statistics and censuses), so that part of the nomination statement isn't correct, and a Demography article would resolve the XY issues. Demographics of Europe#History is the closest thing I've found to content that matches the subject, but I'm torn between retargetting there and reverting the BLAR in favour of an AfD (while at first glance it seems a sure delete, those with subject matter knowledge I don't have may see something salvageable in it. Thryduulf ( talk) 02:01, 8 December 2023 (UTC) reply
Nominator comment: Early european population statistics and censuses added to this discussion. For what it's worth, this redirect has no edit history. Steel1943 ( talk) 03:35, 8 December 2023 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Any further thoughts?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 07:00, 16 December 2023 (UTC) reply

  • Retarget to Demographics of Europe#History per Thryduulf. Jay 💬 07:10, 23 December 2023 (UTC) reply
    Striking off in agreement with Tavix. "Census" specifically in the title would make it a poor redirect. Jay 💬 06:35, 1 January 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Delete, Demographics of Europe#History does not contain any information about early censuses; the data provided are merely population estimates. -- Tavix ( talk) 23:21, 31 December 2023 (UTC) reply
  • Revert without prejudice to AfD. Tavix's comments have convinced me that this wouldn't make a good redirect to that target, and I've not found anything better. This leaves us with article content that has never been discussed in an appropriate venue, so the BLAR should be reverted without prejudice to AfD. Thryduulf ( talk) 16:01, 1 January 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BDD ( talk) 18:46, 4 January 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Utopes ( talk / cont) 22:25, 20 January 2024 (UTC) reply

  • Delete With no one speaking up in defense, taking this to AfD fails the WP:SNOWBALL test to me. I have no reason to believe this nomination was meant as an end-run around AfD, so I believe this has been appropriate discussed at a deletion venue. -- BDD ( talk) 19:45, 30 January 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Delete. If the only information about "Early European population statistics and censuses" is in "census" I am sure the reader can find that article. If it is not, the redirect makes no sense. No one opinted a better target. No one defended the old content (although it does not look that bad, I doubt it is worth getting it back) - Nabla ( talk) 23:52, 4 February 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Restore per Thryduulf. Existed as an article for around 4 years. Also note that the edit summary accompanying the BLAR was misleading, as there was a reference, just no inline citations. Also pinging the original BLARer Cordless Larry as it doesn't appear they have been made aware of this discussion when they were technically the creator of this redirect. A7V2 ( talk) 07:58, 6 February 2024 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Trade War with China

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Trade war#List of trade wars or trade disputes. -- BDD ( talk) 19:40, 30 January 2024 (UTC) reply

Also note that there exists an article on the Australia–China trade war, so the America-China trade war is not necessarily the primary topic of the phrase "Trade War with China". Silcox ( talk) 06:42, 7 December 2023 (UTC) reply

  • Comment, pageviews indicate that for every day last month, the China-US page received between more than 10x minimum – 20x maximum the pageviews when compared to the Australian version of the same topic. I agree that a hatnote would definitely be useful linking to the Australian page, though. Utopes ( talk / cont) 07:17, 7 December 2023 (UTC) reply
  • Keep with hatnote per @ Utopes, but I will keep this RfD open for the time being to be open to voices regarding this redirect Silcox ( talk) 07:52, 7 December 2023 (UTC) reply
  • Keep with hatnote per Utopes. I'd be tempted to point the hatnote at Trade war#List of trade wars or trade disputes (or the List of trade wars redirect I've just created to it) but it doesn't currently list the Australian example. It does however include the Opium wars between China and the west. Thryduulf ( talk) 12:22, 7 December 2023 (UTC) reply
    I've added Australia–China trade war to that list. Hey man im josh ( talk) 16:42, 7 December 2023 (UTC) reply
  • Keep with hatnote per above. 〜 Askarion ✉ 16:14, 7 December 2023 (UTC) reply
  • Disambiguate. For a general search term like this one that's ambiguous between different countries, we shouldn't favor the country with a larger population just because that article gets more views. This is relevant to Wikipedia's systemic bias. Moreover, in terms of long-term significance the Opium Wars probably have a stronger claim to primary topic status than either of the other two articles. — Mx. Granger ( talk · contribs) 02:37, 8 December 2023 (UTC) reply
  • Setindexify the most famous trade wars with China are the Opium Wars; the current target is definitively bad, since it is not the most famous or the most consequential trade war with China. The actual wars that was also a trade war would be better as a target if this were to remain a redirect. Afterall, the British pushed drugs onto China and got Hong Kong as compensation for having lost their drug dealers after China lost the drug war to the drug kingpins. -- 65.92.247.90 ( talk) 06:37, 8 December 2023 (UTC) reply
  • Setindexify per IP and Mx. Granger. Definitely do not keep as is for such a general term. Jay 💬 08:20, 14 December 2023 (UTC) reply
    Drafted at the redirect. My issue with Trade war#List of trade wars or trade disputes is that it is not sectioned or categorized by country, and while searching for China shows two China-related wars, Opium wars in another section is not as evident as others as a China-related trade war. Jay 💬 10:25, 12 January 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 23:46, 16 December 2023 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Complex/ Rational 02:09, 4 January 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Keep, set indexify, or retarget?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Utopes ( talk / cont) 22:24, 20 January 2024 (UTC) reply

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Mozart Society of Vienna

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 January 28#Mozart Society of Vienna

COM:MOA

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 16:40, 29 January 2024 (UTC) reply

Not an accepted pseudo-namespace. We only very rarely allow technical issues elsewhere to take over mainspace, and I don't see a good reason to do so here. For the record I did read the editnotice explaining the technical issue, but am not convinced it warrants this unusual solution. The second redirect is probably speedyable as G4 per Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2018_March_13#COM:OVERWRITE * Pppery * it has begun... 21:07, 20 January 2024 (UTC) reply

I had created COM:MOA only to fix a redlink. The reason I gave during page creation was "hundreds of mobile uploads on commons are used on enwiki and the enwiki "File history" comment has an unintentional redlink saying "Uploaded using Commons Mobile App" (a redlink to commons page); this redirect page gives a landing point to those thousands of redlinks". I don't know technical rules here so feel free to do what you must. Thanks. Kiran_891 ( TALK) 21:11, 20 January 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Delete per nom, an unnatural pseudo-namespace that otherwise sees zero common usage, and not widely adopted. (Went ahead and checked, these are 2 of the 3 current usages of this prefix on Wikipedia. The other is COM:FR, unsure if @ Pppery: saw that one for a bundle.) Utopes ( talk / cont) 21:53, 20 January 2024 (UTC) reply
    I didn't because I was looking at articlespace soft redirects only for this and a giant mass nom I'm currently composing. Feel free to bundle it. * Pppery * it has begun... 21:54, 20 January 2024 (UTC) reply
I thought about bundling COM:FR, will probably leave it be for now (or at a later time), seems to have further stipulations and isn't just a direct link to commons, but instead is a link to project space which soft redirects to commons. Could possibly be it's own thing on a later date. Utopes ( talk / cont) 22:15, 20 January 2024 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

P:USRD/AFD

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 00:23, 28 January 2024 (UTC) reply

The target page has been marked as historical since 2016; it is not being frequently accessed, so there does not seem to be a need for a pseudo-namespace redirect pointing here which is intended to provide quick shortcut access to high-traffic areas. Utopes ( talk / cont) 18:38, 20 January 2024 (UTC) reply

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Trader Joe (song)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 19:45, 27 January 2024 (UTC) reply

Unlikely search term, extremely low pageviews, causes massive astonishment when you search for Trader Joe's. Aaron Liu ( talk) 18:35, 20 January 2024 (UTC) reply

  • Keep Perfectly standard {{ R from song}} * Pppery * it has begun... 21:07, 20 January 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Keep. I don't see what's wrong with this either. Ss 112 22:36, 20 January 2024 (UTC) reply
    Well, at least for me, this causes a lot of astonishment when I search for "Trader Joe" as it becomes a search result for it when I want to know things related to the supermarket, and since the redirect isn't used much anyways I think we should delete per the principle of least astonishment. Aaron Liu ( talk) 22:47, 20 January 2024 (UTC) reply
    Trader Joe (no apostrophe's) is currently a redirect to Trader Joe's, why would a different topic about "Trader Joe" lose it's valid song redirect just because another topic exists? Utopes ( talk / cont) 23:47, 20 January 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Keep I don't see how this would cause astonishment. It's properly disambiguated. - Presidentman talk · contribs ( Talkback) 22:57, 20 January 2024 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

P:SLO/A

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 January 29#P:SLO/A

The Conservatism Portal

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 00:23, 28 January 2024 (UTC) reply

No other portal redirect calls itself "The [Blank] Portal"; I find it unlikely that anyone looking for this portal would be relying on a cross-namespace redirect starting with the word "The", as no other portal-space redirect does anything similar to this. Utopes ( talk / cont) 18:29, 20 January 2024 (UTC) reply

  • Delete webportals exist, and are not wikipedia portals. Such a portal would use this, and not an XNR -- 65.92.247.66 ( talk) 07:15, 23 January 2024 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Alps (Topic overview)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy delete. CSD G7 Liz Read! Talk! 19:30, 21 January 2024 (UTC) reply

A redirect to portal space that was created as a test for whether it would increase traffic to portals (understood via edit summary). As this is a one-off occurrence of this nomenclature, with no other portal redirect being considered a topic overview, I don't think this would be a likely search term, but moreso the remains of an inconclusive traffic test (which is a totally fair experiment, but not one that seems necessary to keep). Utopes ( talk / cont) 18:26, 20 January 2024 (UTC) reply

  • Delete I created this as a test (and forgot about it). I don't think it had any impact, so happy to see it go. Nick Moyes ( talk) 10:32, 21 January 2024 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Samsung Galaxy Tab S6. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 06:27, 27 January 2024 (UTC) reply

This page was redirected by Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite. But, the contents of Galaxy Tab S6 Lite were added in Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 article. So, I hope Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite page to be retargeted to Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 article. Hajoon0102 💬 11:49, 20 January 2024 (UTC) reply

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

192.0.34.166

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 January 27#192.0.34.166

Sonig

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 14:14, 27 January 2024 (UTC) reply

Not exclusive to Mouse on Mars, who also are not founders of this label. Jalen Folf (talk) 06:52, 20 January 2024 (UTC) reply

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

First Date(That '70s Show episdoe) and etc.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 14:14, 27 January 2024 (UTC) reply

While going through the redirects that contained unclosed parentheses for their disambiguators, there were a number of other 70s Show redirects that I noticed which were also otherwise implausible typos, due to missing spaces or misspellings, or both. Going to include these all in a bundle as well, despite the variation in typographical errors, as they all share the commonality of previously pointing at individual episodes which later got merged back into a list (these episodes don't really receive due diligence at the target article to begin with) Utopes ( talk / cont) 02:21, 20 January 2024 (UTC) reply

Delete all. These have standard versions ( Drive In (That '70s Show episode)). Gonnym ( talk) 09:50, 22 January 2024 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Andrew Sinclair (privy councellor and etc.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 14:16, 27 January 2024 (UTC) reply

A bundle of redirects that are missing parentheses. This group contains titles ranging from letters A - E, and all of these listed have received zero pageviews in the last month, identified through this source: [1] Utopes ( talk / cont) 00:56, 20 January 2024 (UTC) reply

( edit conflict) Support deletion of Darby House (Dawson Springs, Kentucky (as unintentional creator). Did not mean to leave typo with out closing parathesis behind. - RevelationDirect ( talk) 01:16, 20 January 2024 (UTC) reply
( edit conflict) Speedy delete Brice Creek (Trent River tributary. I created this redirect by accident in a page move, so please delete it by G7. JJP Mas ter ( she/ they) 01:48, 20 January 2024 (UTC) reply
Unfortunately, this redirect (and most others here, but in relation to this case) cannot usually be G7'ed. When it comes to pages created by way of a page move, G7s can only apply when the person that moves the page (and leaves a redirect) is also the original author of the first page in question. G6 is more likely to take effect, but oftentimes these titles have been sitting around for a while so they end up coming through RfD anyway. Utopes ( talk / cont) 02:09, 20 January 2024 (UTC) reply
( edit conflict) It (re: Bill Otto (born 1956) only exists because I made a typo when I first tried to move it. This probably could be a speedy. JDDJS ( talk to me • see what I've done) 01:50, 20 January 2024 (UTC) reply
Probably goes without saying, but it looks like a substantial number of the redirects in this list would be perfectly valid and reasonable redirects were the close paren included. While I don't think anyone would complain about just deleting the ones that only differ from the correct article name by the close paren (as presumably 100% of them were created by mistake), care should be taken to make sure that the ones that are just typos of what would be a valid redirect simply have the close paren added. I don't think any of these need to be kept as-is though. Sellyme Talk 04:06, 20 January 2024 (UTC) reply
Support deletion of Bleed Out (Within Temptation album, created accidentally by me through correcting a page name and must've flown under my radar. Neutral on others. Schminnte [ talk to me 07:21, 20 January 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Delete all - on the reason that it is very unlikely any of these redirects are linked on any article. Iggy ( Swan) ( Contribs) 09:01, 20 January 2024 (UTC) reply
  • I have moved two of these entries that were noted in the Tree of Life article alerts ( Calonema radiatum ( and Calonemorchis radiatum () to Calonema radiatum and Calonemorchis radiatum, without creating a redirect, since without the typo they represent correct species synonym redirects that were otherwise absent. Donax (bivalve, on the other hand, does exist in a correct version ( Donax (bivalve)) and should be deleted. - I'm pretty sure that this list should not be simply batch-deleted; many entries probably need to be simply fixed rather than removed. -- Elmidae ( talk · contribs) 13:00, 20 January 2024 (UTC) reply
I did go ahead and fix a couple where I saw it was fit, such as Cedar (WAGL 207 had a pretty shoe-in solution with Cedar (WAGL 207) that didn't exist at the time. That being said, counting out the different titles here, 2/3s of these redirects show up to the left of the same exact title, so page movement couldn't be an option there. Oftentimes, the other pages have fixed versions too, but the fixed version is also a redirect. Whenever I could, I'd make these fixes as to avoid having a longer list at RfD. Generally speaking, moving redirects is often unideal, but it still can happen. The reason these are here are because either they can't be fixed, or probably shouldn't be (if it gets left behind via a page move from a title with multiple errors, possibly something like Bethesda Hospital (694844St. Paul where I would not expect this title be fixed.) Pages with just a trailing "(" and no other content inside of them I considered to be unfixable, as there was no way to determine what was supposed to go in the disambiguator, so thank you for finding a solution for the two at the Tree of Life. If there are any other fixable instances, please let me know, but I feel that out of this list, the opportunity to find solutions on an individual level are few and far between, and most if not all match the same / similar profiles and page histories. Utopes ( talk / cont) 23:06, 20 January 2024 (UTC) reply
I went back through this list, just to make sure that all possibilities were considered and every title examined. Out of all of the redirects here, only two did not have a correct version in existence (or be otherwise implausible for other reasons, leading to me being uncomfortable moving it). Chelleli Kapuram (Telugu TV Series and Communist Party of India (Marxist Leninist were both redirects created at incorrect titles and so far were left unaddressed, which is now complete. After relooking everything over, all the others have correct duplications floating around (or be unlikely), so I'm of the stance that the rest can go with no issues. Utopes ( talk / cont) 23:32, 20 January 2024 (UTC) reply
Very good, thanks for the thorough check! -- Elmidae ( talk · contribs) 08:40, 21 January 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Delete Dorothy Haines Hoover because it was a typo and not supposed to have existed without the closing parentheses. don't care about the rest Thanks, L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 16:22, 20 January 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Delete This is accounted for in {{ New page DYM}}. A possibly relevant previous discussion on RfD which also had a batch nomination of these. Another special case among the redirects is DLF (seed company=, which should fall under WP:G6 (while a {{ R from move}}, the page has existed only for approximately a minute under that title). Randi🦋 Talk Contribs 16:40, 20 January 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Delete all per nom. All are missing the closing parenthesis, and most of these titles redirect to titles that do have the closing parenthesis. Many of these seem to have been created by accident during the page-move process, as evidenced by at least five of the above comments. – Epicgenius ( talk) 18:37, 20 January 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Delete all. InfiniteNexus ( talk) 00:30, 21 January 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Delete all. Per nom. Rsk6400 ( talk) 16:52, 21 January 2024 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Draft:High in the Clouds (film)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy keep. No reason to delete it here. (non-admin closure) Aaron Liu ( talk) 18:36, 20 January 2024 (UTC) reply

Please delete this redirect. I want to create it from scratch. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.92.108.74 ( talk) 00:40, 20 January 2024 (UTC) reply

You can simply blank the redirect and write something else in its place. There's no need to bring it here. Glades12 ( talk) 00:59, 20 January 2024 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from " https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2024_January_20&oldid=1204828138"