This page is an archive and its contents should be preserved in their current form;
any comments regarding this page should be directed to
Template talk:In the news. Thanks.
Burma's
government announces it will allow
Rohingyas who have fled to neighboring countries to return only if they identify themselves as
Bengalis.
(BBC)
Btw, it was 7 million, not 7 billion. --
BorgQueen (
talk) 06:08, 1 March 2009 (UTC)reply
Is this really that noteworthy. Seven million is not that much. Across the boader in NI they had a £20+ million robbery only a couple of years and the Securiates robbery in Kent even more recently was over £50million. Also why are some national records considered good for ITN and others not so. The RBS corperate loss which was a UK record was not considered ITN worthy so why is this? I mean being honest it doesn't have any international appeal really does it --
Daviessimo (
talk) 10:30, 1 March 2009 (UTC)reply
I suppose that is because record-setting corporate losses are not that uncommon these days. As for the "appeal" part, quite a few people are checking out the article for the past several hours according to the
stats. --
BorgQueen (
talk) 10:41, 1 March 2009 (UTC)reply
Well thats all well and good but where is the consensus. Recently simply nominating an article seems to be enough for it going up, as has occured on several occasions recently such as with this and the Bolivian epidemic. I agree that the latter should have gone up but ITN is meant to be about consensus and not about just a few users individual opinions. Thus my opinion would be that the Ireland story should come down until it has more support. If others support it I'm more than happy with it being up. --
Daviessimo (
talk) 10:52, 1 March 2009 (UTC)reply
I normally wait for at least a couple of hours but apparently that's not enough for you. How long shall we wait? 12 hours? --
BorgQueen (
talk) 11:56, 1 March 2009 (UTC)reply
It's not a case of how long, it's a case of consensus. No concensus was drawn on this before this went up. If no-one airs an opinion that doesn't neccesarily mean it should go up, otherwise half of the nominated items would be going up. All I'm saying is that before an item goes up at leasttwo people should support it (not including the posting admin) and any potential problems have been sorted. As I said above I personally don't think this is noteworthy enough but if there is a broad consensus in support I'm happy for it to be up. At the moment however that doesn't exist --
Daviessimo (
talk) 12:09, 1 March 2009 (UTC)reply
Actually I've been told by
User:PFHLai that "no prior consensus is required before any items are added to ITN"
[1] and another user
commented that "any admin can post an item without discussion first". Has the rule changed since? --
BorgQueen (
talk) 12:20, 1 March 2009 (UTC)reply
OK, deep breath. Sorry (about the incorrect figure), I was stressed at the time as I will explain further below. And yes, it's notable as it is a record breaking occurrence that is unusual in a particular area. I thought it would make a change from all the killer crashes and explosions, the amount of which some have been questioning on
Talk:Main Page. I was aware of the
Northern Bank robbery, actually basing the title and opening sentence on it for some consistency. Politically, whether liked or not (and for the purposes of the record), the two robberies took place in separate countries – even though, geographically, they are on the one island. To try to appease both these and trying to remain neutral, I pipe-linked it like so –
Irish – but can see I have also failed in this area. Corporate losses are all the rage, name any recent bank robbery (with its own article) that this can be compared to. Daviessimo, if you want to help, please contribute more. BorgQueen has been the most frequent recent contributor to ITN in my knowledge, and having compiled the
ITN stats for February 2009 just before all this, I find that all but four (of which at least two of those are listed recurring events involving sports and awards) have been posted by BorgQueen in that month alone. I have spent much of this time trying to keep ITN updated – I store my recent ITN contributions
here but have not had time to compile a proper table with links to evidence like I have done with my GAs/DYKs. I am getting seriously irritated at this stage as this has happened less than twenty-four hours after one editor over at DYK has, for no apparent logical reason, called
the best part of six months of my contributions into question in the most deflating and exasperating way possible. If I were to leave ITN, that may mean some items never get posted (and some items may never even get nominated if recent figures are anything to go by!) as BorgQueen would then be the sole dominant regular contributor – and then you will have achieved consensus! I don't seek excess credit for all of this – it is a pleasure enough to have something one has contributed to on the home page of one of the world's most popular websites – but, if my contributions to the Main Page are being called into question so suddenly in this manner, I will be retreating from these areas – I can see no further point in being smeared by allegations of a nature I have done my level best to avoid. --CandlewickeST# :) 15:25, 1 March 2009 (UTC)reply
I think you need to separate the issues you are facing at DYK from the ones at ITN. No one is accusing you of plagiarism here. Daviessimo is telling something completely different. DYK and ITN are two different places and we have very different rules. I am sure most people, if not all, here at ITN would agree you have been doing a good work. --
BorgQueen (
talk) 15:43, 1 March 2009 (UTC)reply
Sorry, just having a general crisis of confidence about the Main Page... --CandlewickeST# :) 16:03, 1 March 2009 (UTC)reply
Now you know how Mwalcoff and Madcoverboy felt. P.S. 7 million Euros is a lot, at least in our place... –HowardtheDuck 13:15, 2 March 2009 (UTC)reply
Sorry if you took my comments that way I wasn't aiming at either you or this story. I was simply questioning the current system that is used to decide what goes into ITN. I've been in and about ITN for the last several months and seem to find different editors and admins have different policies, although it seemed to have settled prior to christmas with normally two votes in favour (excluding posting admin) and the item could go up. Anyways I completely understand that ITN is suffering from a lack of contributions, however I fear that as much as it is insufficient awareness or general lethargy, people who stumbleo on this page are very confused as to what is eligible for inclusion on the main page. As far as I was aware it was for this reason that no item was automatically included or exluded and rather a system of concensus was used, with the ultimate aim to get more people involved. --
Daviessimo (
talk) 17:41, 1 March 2009 (UTC)reply
I'm afraid ITN has lost another contributor. I will not be appearing on the Main Page in future, not because I dislike it, but because it would be improper in the current circumstances.
BorgQueen and others may have faith in my contributions but it appears there are some unexpected difficulties at DYK. If my DYK contributions are being called into question, I cannot reasonably bring myself to contribute to an ITN section which visitors to the Main Page see before DYK. I imagine ITN will have some difficulty now but it appears to be out of my hands. Recruitment is not working very well and neither have any attempts by myself or others to point out ITN to outsiders. Perhaps a list of typical accepted and unaccepted items could be constructed and placed at the top of the page – I may do that some time since it does not involve the tedious nature of applying references. Apologies
Daviessimo, if there was any misunderstanding between us above, and also BorgQueen, the current most regular ITN poster. But I do not have the confidence to continue as I am currently doing. --CandlewickeST# :) 18:26, 1 March 2009 (UTC)reply
Personally, I've gotten used to the two supporters guideline, the posting admin and the nominator. There simply aren't enought contributors at ITN to really do anything else...if there's questions, the item goes down/is hidden until the comments have been resolved, and the item will either reappear or disappear. I agree with Candlewicke at being annoyed with people (not you Daviessimo, but others; you actually help out here sometimes) who complain about what goes up at ITN, but yet don't ever help with it, or make suggestions, or anything else. Candlewicke: I am extremely sorry about what has occurred, and you have my complete faith...in your many ITN items I've reviewed (even after they go up, just to check) or cowritten, I've never seen issues with plagiarism. SpencerT♦C 19:15, 1 March 2009 (UTC)reply
This looks like an interesting story. I don't know which article to update, though. --Tone 16:53, 27 February 2009 (UTC)reply
I added that to yesterday's current events. However, I also added other such scientific-discovery type stories on the oldest words in the English language, the delivery of 90,000 seeds to the Doomsday Vault in the Arctic Circle and the evolution of HIV... I would consider those three either more or just as interesting/significant but that might be just an opinion... --CandlewickeST# :) 17:58, 27 February 2009 (UTC)reply
Footprint has a section titled "Ancient footprints" – although it is currently little more than a list. --CandlewickeST# :) 18:03, 27 February 2009 (UTC)reply
I like the Doomsday Vault story as well. Though there is no update in the article yet. --Tone 19:57, 27 February 2009 (UTC)reply
90,000 added out of a total of ~20 million? I'm not sure if this is notable enough. Although 90,000 may seem like a lot, it appears to be a drop in the bucket to the actual amount. SpencerT♦C 22:28, 27 February 2009 (UTC)reply
It's also the first anniversary, there was an international conference and at any rate 90,000 is a lot of seeds saved by any estimation. I would think that this is a large enough amount to be added in one go as it was reported. If it were small or this were happening any day there would not be daily updates... the figure 90,000 would be seen as massive if it involved deaths or injuries... so why not the preservation of vital food supplies that would prevent such deaths? --CandlewickeST# :) 00:15, 28 February 2009 (UTC)reply
Looking at the article, it compares the seed storage to that of a bank deposite box. A more realistic comparison would be depositing 90,000 coins in a box that already has 19.91 million. I assumed the number was reported because it was the first anniversary of the bank, not because a record number were being banked. However, if this is a record, I'd be more interested. In addition, the saving of 90 thousand lives is bordering on speculation...there aren't any current seed shortages, this is just a doomsday vault. I hope you understand where I'm coming from here. SpencerT♦C 00:43, 28 February 2009 (UTC)reply
Yes, but preserving 90,000 of anything in one go is not an everyday occurrence... --CandlewickeST# :) 01:57, 28 February 2009 (UTC)reply
I've actually been doing some unofficial research on this, and 90,000 seeds is a lot for this, and a new (record?) number of species is being banked...so posting. (under correct date). SpencerT♦C 19:49, 1 March 2009 (UTC)reply
And therefore approved, or is that cheating? Link the U.S. perhaps? Plus the particular type of dollar? And cut out the redirects? --CandlewickeST# :) 04:09, 28 February 2009 (UTC)reply
Going to post soon. --
BorgQueen (
talk) 05:38, 28 February 2009 (UTC)reply
The
Rocky Mountain News, one of Colorado's largest newspapers, publishes its last issue. This issue hits the streets the following morning.[www.9news.com]
ITN candidates for February 26
Nom record RBS loss in 2008. --
bender235 (
talk) 14:03, 26 February 2009 (UTC)reply
There are several reports from companies about losses, we can't cover them all. I'd say no. --Tone 14:31, 26 February 2009 (UTC)reply
Agreed. There's a new one every day where I am. Not all are discussed internationally. Bankruptcies and government takeovers are much more notable. --CandlewickeST# :) 18:19, 26 February 2009 (UTC)reply
Well it depends. This is the largest corporate loss in UK history, which all things being considered means there is a good chance it is one of the largest in Europe, if not the world. It is according to Forbes the
tenth largest business in the world and is effectively state owned (and as such the losses are against the UK taxpayer). Without context we can't just presume it is not ITN worthy because businesses make big losses all the time. For a comparison consider the GM results today which was less than half of this, that being one of the largest auto-makers in the world that neared bankruptcy just a couple of months ago. --
Daviessimo (
talk) 20:49, 26 February 2009 (UTC)reply
Huh? How does the largest corporate loss in UK history, if that's what it is, automatically qualify it as potentially one of the largest in Europe or even the world?! That's making assumptions on the most extreme level... ITN (and Wikipedia) deals with facts, not ifs, buts and maybes... if such an astonishing claim can be sourced, well then... for now it's just speculation... --CandlewickeST# :) 21:11, 26 February 2009 (UTC)reply
Strike action
I know
this type of thing probably happens every day but what about when it hasn't happened in twenty years? --CandlewickeST# :) 18:28, 26 February 2009 (UTC)reply
– that said, I suspect there will be much more, so it could be left for a few days to build up... --CandlewickeST# :) 18:51, 26 February 2009 (UTC)reply
Another Irish news? Is this very important? –HowardtheDuck 05:00, 28 February 2009 (UTC)reply
No. This was the day before the bank robbery which stole the headlines. As for importance I will leave that up to you to decide based upon all those sources that I've provided (and many more I could if you wish)... --CandlewickeST# :) 03:06, 2 March 2009 (UTC)reply
ICTY trial result
Another trial result? I know there is another war crimes on at the moment, but I can't change what is in the news.
The BBC are reporting that Milutinovic has been acquitted
[2] - Personally I think that if this were to go up that could be more important that the sentencing of the others. --
Daviessimo (
talk) 20:57, 26 February 2009 (UTC)reply
Looks good. Please create a relevant article. --
BorgQueen (
talk) 03:14, 27 February 2009 (UTC)reply
Spanish drugs/football scandal
This one is breaking so it's one to watch. Arrests in cities across Spain. Reports that one is a professional footballer in the country, another a former French football manager and agents from FIFA are involved too. Sounds big – could become high profile... --CandlewickeST# :) 20:15, 26 February 2009 (UTC)reply
Yes, let's see if any of them are convicted. --
BorgQueen (
talk) 03:18, 27 February 2009 (UTC)reply
Issue of museum openings
In relation to the openings of museums discussed earlier in the week, it turns out they are everyday events.
Here's the third one this week... --CandlewickeST# :) 20:22, 26 February 2009 (UTC)reply
Ye but let's be honest what happened in Baghdad was unique. Museum closed to public under Saddam, pilfered when he falls, its antiquities spread all over the world illegally, yet here we are five years on and the museum has opened to the public. We can't apply set rules without considering the broader context and that was more than just another opening. --
Daviessimo (
talk) 20:38, 26 February 2009 (UTC)reply
Kathmandu's followed the abolition of a centuries-old monarchy... --CandlewickeST# :) 21:06, 26 February 2009 (UTC)reply
Not that old.
Nepalese monarchy only started in the 1760s. Not that old when you compare to the Japanese or British. –HowardtheDuck 04:57, 28 February 2009 (UTC)reply
An international team of scientists announces the completion of its mission to map the Gamburtsev Mountain Range beneath the
Antarctic ice.
It's got international appeal... UK, US, Germany, Australia, China, Japan, etc... --CandlewickeST# :) 02:27, 25 February 2009 (UTC)reply
We have little Antarctica-oriented stories although the continent is even bigger than Europe... Ok, joke aside, support. --Tone 12:57, 25 February 2009 (UTC)reply
I think this is noteworthy enough. We had the Hudson crash and no one died in that, plus this is likely to be a hull loss crash --
Daviessimo (
talk) 11:00, 25 February 2009 (UTC)reply
So a plane crashing short of the runway, breaking into three pieces, nearly smashing into a main road, forcing the closure of one of the busiest airports in the world isn't noteworthy --
Daviessimo (
talk) 11:58, 25 February 2009 (UTC)reply
On ITN, "nearly" or "almost" doesn't count. The closure part is a bit better - If other people support it, I won't make any objection. --
BorgQueen (
talk) 12:13, 25 February 2009 (UTC)reply
Looks like the latest press conference announced that not everyone made it out alive. Support feature. -
Mailer Diablo 12:42, 25 February 2009 (UTC)reply
It's not every day (or every year) that a plane crashes, in the middle of the cityand everyone survives. I guess we can correlate this to Hudson River ditching; sure everyone survived but it wasn't everyday that a plane ditched on a river and everyone survived. Now if this was plane that locked its landing gear in the airport and skidded on the runway and everyone survived it would've been more common. –HowardtheDuck 12:50, 25 February 2009 (UTC)reply
BBC News is now reporting nine fatalities and over fifty injured --
Daviessimo (
talk) 12:51, 25 February 2009 (UTC)reply
Support inclusion but until it's clear how many casualties there were, don't put on the number (or write more than ? killed). --Tone 12:57, 25 February 2009 (UTC)reply
Press attention is picking up.
[4] It occurred on Tibetan New Year. Coincides with a fresh crackdown in Tibet.
[5] I say it's worthy story encompassing much wider tension in Tibet and China.
Shiplevelone (
talk) 20:30, 25 February 2009 (UTC)reply
Not ITN material... regarding the prison stories, there was a spectacular escape in Greece a couple of days ago but we're not having it because ITN is not a news service ;-) --Tone 22:10, 25 February 2009 (UTC)reply
Bangladesh Rifles revolt
2009 Bangladesh Rifles revolt article was made to supply for the news The Bangladesh Rifles mutiny in Dhaka, killing one person and injuring eight. (AFP via Google News). Can someone please have a look at the article and update the first page with it? The news is very important and got the attention of World Media. I have also added reference sources from BBC, CNN, Alzajeera and a few leading Bangladeshi dailies. Regards--
Tarif from Bangladesh (
talk) 03:47, 26 February 2009 (UTC)reply
more references were added and information were given. Please add it to the main page or give more feedbacks so that we can work it to the main page. Regards--
Tarif from Bangladesh (
talk) 08:59, 26 February 2009 (UTC)reply
Wow, this got big. Can you suggest a wording to reflect the current situation? --Tone 09:04, 26 February 2009 (UTC)reply
An engagement? Certainly not. I'm not too sure about her (future) marriage though. --
BorgQueen (
talk) 18:59, 24 February 2009 (UTC)reply
National Museum of Iraq
Potentialy interesting ITN candidate, especially in connection with all stolen and then recovered items. Needs updates, though. Opinions? --Tone 14:47, 24 February 2009 (UTC)reply
The reopening of a museum? Is this a significant story? --CandlewickeST# :) 15:02, 24 February 2009 (UTC)reply
Just as I typed that I discovered
this. Which leads me to think that museum openings are indeed very everyday topics... --CandlewickeST# :) 15:05, 24 February 2009 (UTC)reply
I agree with Candlewicke. Unless there are some controversies attached, not really for ITN. --
BorgQueen (
talk) 15:53, 24 February 2009 (UTC)reply
Well being honest you can't compare the two - the National Museum of Iraq is exactly that, a national Museum and it holds/held all the greatest 'treasures' in the country, whilst the tsunami museum is related to only one event. Its re-opening is symbolic for two reasons - firstly because given the looting after the invasion it shows how far the country has moved forward -secondly because it could have profound implications on the antiquities trade, given that Iraq museum pieces are more likely to now be tradable by the major auction houses. Just my tuppence though --
Daviessimo (
talk) 16:02, 24 February 2009 (UTC)reply
(ec) I was thinking about the artefacts stolen during the war as the controversy. And this is historically important museum. Just felt it is reasonable to discuss the option. --Tone 16:10, 24 February 2009 (UTC)reply
Rare cheetah photos
This is much more interesting and unusual, although I suspect not for ITN (and the animal does not appear to have an article). --CandlewickeST# :) 15:26, 24 February 2009 (UTC)reply
Not really my type, though interesting. A photo was taken. I think it has to be a discovery of a new species to go to ITN. --Tone 16:10, 24 February 2009 (UTC)reply
Lab teeth
Then there is
this; however,it requires a lot of believing and some coulds and maybes so not really good enough either. --CandlewickeST# :) 15:31, 24 February 2009 (UTC)reply
Too many maybes for now. When they actually make a useful piece... --Tone 16:10, 24 February 2009 (UTC)reply
Somalia erupts
This is more like it. Not sure if it'll be selected as Somalia has been getting a few ITNs and deaths have been overkill recently. But worth a shot. --CandlewickeST# :) 15:42, 24 February 2009 (UTC)reply
Looks bad enough to qualify. Would you like to create an article on it? And please watch for Pakistan-related news since we have developed a deficiency of the topic. --
BorgQueen (
talk) 15:58, 24 February 2009 (UTC)reply
It's a part of the civil war. If you decide it merits its own article The battle of ??, then I support. Otherwise, no. --Tone 16:10, 24 February 2009 (UTC)reply
I agree it would but there have been recent planned launches by other countries (plus the planned closure of Guantanamo Bay) which have been dismissed because they are simply plans and not all plans come to fruition. So including this at ITN would be an inconsistent move. But if it happens I would support it then. --CandlewickeST# :) 18:39, 23 February 2009 (UTC)reply
I agree with Candlewick. SpencerT♦C 21:33, 23 February 2009 (UTC)reply
Oppose. Its not really significant. --
→ Ãlways Ãhëad (
talk) 02:25, 24 February 2009 (UTC)reply
Not really significant? I wouldn't go that far... --CandlewickeST# :) 09:06, 24 February 2009 (UTC)reply
Its just a proposal + two India-related blurbs are already on the main page. The two candidates below appear to be more interesting.—
Magic.Wiki (
talk) 02:46, 24 February 2009 (UTC)reply
YSL auction
Would
the YSL auction be ITN-worthy? BBC describes it "the biggest ever sale of privately owned art", which
The Globe and Mail confirms. It also has a juicy controversy; China is outraged that they are selling looted bronze heads. --
BorgQueen (
talk) 17:01, 23 February 2009 (UTC)reply
Update: A Paris court
rejected a bid to block the sale of the sculptures claimed by China, and ordered the protesters to pay fines instead. --
BorgQueen (
talk) 19:55, 23 February 2009 (UTC)reply
Sounds interesting... --CandlewickeST# :) 20:03, 23 February 2009 (UTC)reply
We could wait until the bronze heads get sold (scheduled tomorrow), when the controversy will achieve its climax. By the way, if I create an article on it, what name should it have? How about
Saint Laurent art collection controversy? --
BorgQueen (
talk) 14:43, 24 February 2009 (UTC)reply
Comet Lulin is coming. I don't know about our criteria regarding comets, but they say this is the first time it has visited our solar system and may well be the last. Let me know if anyone thinks it is notable enough for ITN. --
BorgQueen (
talk) 20:30, 23 February 2009 (UTC)reply
First and last time sounds good. Plus it would please those on
Talk:Main Page who are currently despairing over our repetitive coverage of crashes, explosions and general misery and deaths... --CandlewickeST# :) 00:27, 24 February 2009 (UTC)reply
Is there no chance that this will smash into the earth? ;) We only get about one naked eye comet a year so I'd support this one. --
Stephen 01:11, 24 February 2009 (UTC)reply
Support. The article is sufficiently informative. The blurb should include that today is the peak of visibility. --Tone 09:04, 24 February 2009 (UTC)reply
I just observed the comet last night. Not quite naked-eye visibility for my location, but many people have observed it in dark skies. I would expect the magnitude to have peaked brighter than +6.0, though, considering so people have seen it with the naked eye since Feb. 7, so more info may come later. ~
AH1(
TCU) 21:15, 24 February 2009 (UTC)reply
If consensus supports, I will update the article further. --
BorgQueen (
talk) 08:53, 22 February 2009 (UTC)reply
I wouldn't put it on ITN, just opening a new facility. --Tone 12:00, 22 February 2009 (UTC)reply
2009 Shanxi mine blast
Since at least 73 people died in this, probably ITN-worthy even though such accidents are not extremely uncommon in PRC. We have
2009 Shanxi mine blast and it is still very short. Does anyone want to expand? --
BorgQueen (
talk) 08:58, 22 February 2009 (UTC)reply
The awards will be handed out today (actually, tomorrow early morning in my time zone.) Proposed wording is something like xx wins yy awards including best picture and something else at the Academy Awards. --Tone 12:00, 22 February 2009 (UTC)reply
Seeing as
Danny Boyle and Slumdog Millionaire were featured on ITN for the Golden Globes, might we go a different route it were to win best picture? Grsz11 01:46, 23 February 2009 (UTC)reply
Wow, thank you for that terrific perspective. Grsz11 03:27, 23 February 2009 (UTC)reply
There is no other award worth mentioning. Only the Best Picture should make the cut. We can consider Best Director, Actor and Actress if we want to add pics. –HowardtheDuck 04:05, 23 February 2009 (UTC)reply
The article needs some tidying up though. --
BorgQueen (
talk) 12:15, 22 February 2009 (UTC)reply
I have done some work on it — added some text in the lead and rewrote the "reaction" section which was earlier copy-pasted directly from
cnn —
Magic.Wiki (
talk) 15:12, 22 February 2009 (UTC)reply
Article still needs more attention (refs and style), so don't put up yet...I'll work on it. SpencerT♦C 19:07, 22 February 2009 (UTC)reply
I agree, please take your time. --
BorgQueen (
talk) 19:13, 22 February 2009 (UTC)reply
Okay, reorganised, more refs, and better fleshed-out. Wording: An outbreak of
Hepatitis B in
Gujarat,
India, kills 49 people and infects 125. I'll post, but can you give me the recognition tag? Thanks, SpencerT♦C 19:58, 22 February 2009 (UTC)reply
2009 Khan el-Khalili explosion
A bomb thrown into the crowded
Khan El-Khalili square killes, at least, a French woman, a tourist and two locals in
Cairo,
Egypt.
The incident is very important with many European causalities sparking the first serious terrorist attack for a couple of years.--
Diaa abdelmoneim (
talk) 20:52, 22 February 2009 (UTC)reply
It's too short now. Also, is 4 deaths notable enough? SpencerT♦C 21:36, 22 February 2009 (UTC)reply
In the context I would say yes. Egypt is one of the more stable 'tourist friendly' states in that region and as the above user suggests given that there has been one French person killed and up to fifteen foreigners injured (
[7]) it certainly has international significance =
Daviessimo (
talk) 21:49, 22 February 2009 (UTC)reply
I'd also say this is significant. --CandlewickeST# :) 01:52, 23 February 2009 (UTC)reply
I think it is acceptable, only if somebody expands it a bit. --
BorgQueen (
talk) 05:50, 23 February 2009 (UTC)reply
Is there an article for this
[8]? I'm not sure how common accidents like this are in Eastern Europe, but if this occured in western Europe it would be quite a significant event. --
Daviessimo (
talk) 15:45, 21 February 2009 (UTC)reply
I might create it later if nobody else has gotten to it. We don't hear of anything like this every day. --CandlewickeST# :) 18:34, 21 February 2009 (UTC)reply
Having traveled on railroads in the region I assure you it is not normal for them to hit buses and kill 11 people. --
Mwalcoff (
talk) 00:59, 22 February 2009 (UTC)reply
I'm not sure it's normal for trains and buses to become involved in such an intimate way fullstop. Even the recent
derailment in Orissa was lacking a bus... although bizarrely I mistyped
coach and got redirected to the
Council of Christian Hospitals in – Orissa! Anyway, just waiting to be posted now I guess... --CandlewickeST# :) 01:26, 22 February 2009 (UTC)reply
I think we should wait until the new government is sworn in. Then, certainly. --Tone 18:06, 20 February 2009 (UTC)reply
I don't think we need wait, the president has already decided who will become Israel's next PM. --
Hapsala (
talk) 19:54, 20 February 2009 (UTC)reply
But he still has to form a government and pass a vote in Kneset, right? --Tone 20:05, 20 February 2009 (UTC)reply
Exactly. This seems similar to when it was suggested we should put
Tzipi Livni winning the Kadima leadership election. In that case I pointed out there was no guarantee she would form the next government and be the next PM and it turned out I she didn't. In this case, there is I presume similarly no guarantee Benjamin Netanyahu will form the next government and be the next PM. I'm not that familiar with Israeli politics but I presume by convention no one else tries to form the next government when the President has specifically invited someone but there is still no guarantee of success and if he fails either someone else will be given the chance or a fresh election will be called. It is ultimately up to the members of the Knesset. However I wouldn't mind mentioning the results of the election but the emphasis should be on that.
Nil Einne (
talk) 22:00, 20 February 2009 (UTC)reply
Peanuts
What about this
[9]? Is there an article for it? Scientifically speaking this is a huge move forward. --
Daviessimo (
talk) 07:15, 20 February 2009 (UTC)reply
Interesting but still in testing phase. I'd say wait. --Tone 08:29, 20 February 2009 (UTC)reply
I've heard of this but the article is unconvincing... the headline says "hope" and then there's "a longer-term follow up is now needed to confirm the findings"... --CandlewickeST# :) 13:18, 20 February 2009 (UTC)reply
Latvia
The government resings. Big news. --Tone 18:06, 20 February 2009 (UTC)reply
Are you in hurry? Some blurb please. --
BorgQueen (
talk) 18:17, 20 February 2009 (UTC)reply
Ok, I'm back now. The wording is fine, maybe worth to mention that the reason way the economic crisis (according to the references). --Tone 19:53, 20 February 2009 (UTC)reply
Not my choice of ITN... --Tone 14:46, 19 February 2009 (UTC)reply
That is okay, I was just suggesting it for balance as I noticed the Grammy's made ITN on
February 9.
Rambo's Revenge(talk) 15:24, 19 February 2009 (UTC)reply
The fact that the BRIT Awards has separate categories for British and International means something. –HowardtheDuck 17:21, 19 February 2009 (UTC)reply
I'd be willing to support this if something like the
Meteors went up too... but that won't happen... because we'd have every other national music awards wanting mention... followed by the film awards... and television... and radio... and so on... and on... balance is all very well but it would be impossible to manage... I'd say the Grammys are in a separate class though. And not every Grammy is listed. Just the one considered most important. Also
Duffy links to a disambiguation page. --➨♀♂CandlewickeST# :) 17:31, 19 February 2009 (UTC)reply
There isn't enough prose in the article in the first place to qualify. SpencerT♦C 00:27, 20 February 2009 (UTC)reply
"The French government is now keen to see that the site is protected."
"'Its condition is extraordinary', said Rob Hawkins, project director with Fugro GeoConsulting Limited."
This is much more remarkable in my opinion. It also seems to have been updated so it would be a matter of someone agreeing and also determining whether enough info has been added to allow it onto ITN. --➨♀♂CandlewickeST# :) 17:58, 19 February 2009 (UTC)reply
Cool. The article could be expanded a bit more but I support it now already. --Tone 18:02, 19 February 2009 (UTC)reply
China publishes figures saying that
HIV/
Aids was its leading cause of death in 2008, compared with other infectious diseases, increasing fivefold over three years and thought to be the first time this has happened.
I haven't checked this one properly and it
might need an update but I'll just leave out there and see what everybody thinks. --➨♀♂CandlewickeST# :) 18:24, 19 February 2009 (UTC)reply
I am leaning toward support, provided it is adequately updated. --
BorgQueen (
talk) 10:57, 20 February 2009 (UTC)reply
Really, what's the financial world coming to? I think
Stanford Financial Group fraud case is ITN-worthy but I'd like to know what others think. --
BorgQueen (
talk) 18:26, 19 February 2009 (UTC)reply
Yes. Seems mild enough compared to what's going on in Ireland but this seems to affecting lots more countries.--➨♀♂CandlewickeST# :) 18:29, 19 February 2009 (UTC)reply
Some nice wording please? --
BorgQueen (
talk) 19:09, 19 February 2009 (UTC)reply
Alleged...not good enough for ITN. And this is also an investigation. Oppose for now.SpencerT♦C 00:29, 20 February 2009 (UTC)reply
Agree with Spencer. In the past I think we've always waited for the person to be charged at the very least. --
Daviessimo (
talk) 07:13, 20 February 2009 (UTC)reply
Switzerland is certainly not a tax haven anymore.
[10] I tend to think this is ITN-worthy since
UBS AG is the largest bank in Switzerland according to CNN, and the second-largest bank in Europe according to our own article. --
BorgQueen (
talk) 05:59, 19 February 2009 (UTC)reply
Added "17,000".
[11] The blurb has become a bit too long though. Any alt. suggestions are welcome. --
BorgQueen (
talk) 10:20, 19 February 2009 (UTC)reply
This is a good story. However, the update is a bit short. And the wording could be improved. At present, it can be interpreted that the bank will help people to avoid taxes, what is presumably not the case... --Tone 12:18, 19 February 2009 (UTC)reply
Ok, I will start updating the article. --
BorgQueen (
talk) 12:31, 19 February 2009 (UTC)reply
Is
this news ITN-worthy? Pakistan has been neglected on ITN, and we should come up with something. I suppose the problem is that a lot of people get killed there every day, it is hard to pinpoint one event... The same goes with the Mexican drug war. --
BorgQueen (
talk) 16:27, 18 February 2009 (UTC)reply
I have to agree with you. Pakistan has to be on ITN more often. But whether this is the story I am doubtful. The article itself says "Reporters have often been killed or kidnapped in northwest Pakistan" - I doubt we could make this out to be any more of a special case. Even if one reporter was killed in the U.S. or U.K. I doubt it would be notable for ITN. --➨♀♂CandlewickeST# :) 20:14, 18 February 2009 (UTC)reply
It has only been selected though not launched? I believe at one point we were supposed to having someone on Mars by now but that never exactly took off... --➨♀♂CandlewickeST# :) 20:17, 18 February 2009 (UTC)reply
ITN-worthy I would think. But blogs are not allowed... :/ --➨♀♂CandlewickeST# :) 21:14, 18 February 2009 (UTC)reply
I'd support this one. The sources are reliable, just ignore that blog one. No need to list the species. --Tone 12:24, 19 February 2009 (UTC)reply
Is it wise to ignore blogs? Should something containing a blog be featured on ITN? --➨♀♂CandlewickeST# :) 17:36, 19 February 2009 (UTC)reply
Besides, I feel sort of awkward since the actual discovery was in 2006. I know we've had those "announcement" items before but... 2006 might be a bit too far. --
BorgQueen (
talk) 17:39, 19 February 2009 (UTC)reply
Why not, if they have been made public now. By the way, one ref is a blog, the others are not, I don't see the issue here. Am I missing something? --Tone 17:49, 19 February 2009 (UTC)reply
I'm just saying we don't use blogs, don't we? Or am I missing something? I now think the Danton (see above) is a much better choice. The French governemnt are only moving to protect it now so it must be more recent than 2006. --➨♀♂CandlewickeST# :) 18:27, 19 February 2009 (UTC)reply
Lots of things get signed into law... every day... I imagine the U.S. will even sign into law something else quite quickly... --➨♀♂CandlewickeST# :) 21:44, 17 February 2009 (UTC)reply
Except nothing else involves spending $787,000,000,000 (1/18 of the US's overall GDP). However,
American_Recovery_and_Reinvestment_Act_of_2009#Provisions_of_the_final_billmust be filled in before this should be posted...I'm trying to cleanup the rest of the article right now, and if someone wants to help, it would be appreciated. Thanks, SpencerT♦C 21:51, 17 February 2009 (UTC)reply
That's relative though. It just reflects the wealth of the U.S. and its position in the world. That's not very neutral. --➨♀♂CandlewickeST# :) 21:56, 17 February 2009 (UTC)reply
I also recall that we put up other stimulus packages, including the
2008 Chinese economic stimulus plan, which, according to google is 43.39200 billion USD, much smaller compared to this. 585.18 billion U.S. dollars. SpencerT♦C 22:00, 17 February 2009 (UTC)reply
Oh I guess that's fine then. As long as we put up China. ;) --➨♀♂CandlewickeST# :) 22:11, 17 February 2009 (UTC)reply
I'm still expanding provisions of the final bill; it's quite long. :P. SpencerT♦C 22:46, 17 February 2009 (UTC)reply
Done. Whew that took forever. SpencerT♦C 01:31, 18 February 2009 (UTC)reply
Can you do something about those tags, before we put it up on MP? --
BorgQueen (
talk) 01:37, 18 February 2009 (UTC)reply
I believe that for any trial we should wait until the defendant is convicted (or found not guilty, which is highly unlikely in this particular case). The result of a trial is usually a more significant news than the trial itself. --
BorgQueen (
talk) 10:32, 17 February 2009 (UTC)reply
I don't know, I think this is big enough. He's being charged with crimes against humanity, which is pretty rare and I think having a mention of the start of the trial as well as the verdict is important. The fact that it has taken almost 30 years for this trial to come makes it even more significant --
Daviessimo (
talk) 19:49, 17 February 2009 (UTC)reply
This looks quite historic to me. But perhaps BorgQueen is correct - the result may be better - if the charge is so rare then even any clearance of wrong-doing would be ITN-worthy. --➨♀♂CandlewickeST# :) 21:46, 17 February 2009 (UTC)reply
Oil spill
I'm not sure if it qualifies yet, the WP page hasn't been fleshed out fully, but a
1000 tonne oil spill involving Russian Naval Vessels which originated yesterday is now headed for the south coast of
Ireland.
Trustcited (
talk) 15:56, 17 February 2009 (UTC)reply
"The biggest oil spill in the UK since 1996"; I think that's notable enough. Can you suggest some well-worded blurb? --
BorgQueen (
talk) 18:17, 17 February 2009 (UTC)reply
Just heard of this. Yes, I should think this is ITN material. At last - I'm not the only one getting Ireland on ITN outside elections... --➨♀♂CandlewickeST# :) 21:30, 17 February 2009 (UTC)reply
In the
United Kingdom, section 76 of the Counter-Terrorism Act 2008, which bans taking photographs of law enforcement officers and military personnels to assist acts of terrorism, goes into effect.
[16] Does anyone think this is ITN-worthy? The entire Counter-Terrorism Act is controversial, of course, but some argue that this particular section may seriously restrict freedom of the press (which may or may not be true). -
BorgQueen (
talk) 14:09, 17 February 2009 (UTC)reply
If there are "may"s and "may not"s it may be better just to keep watch on this one until something concrete is declared. --➨♀♂CandlewickeST# :) 21:42, 17 February 2009 (UTC)reply
I think we should wait until they are either convicted or found not guilty. I am hoping for the latter because it will make a far more eyebrow-raising headline (for the rest of us not living in Sweden anyway). --
BorgQueen (
talk) 15:56, 16 February 2009 (UTC)reply
You have half the latter, as 50% of charges have been dropped.
[17]Rambo's Revenge(talk) 16:58, 17 February 2009 (UTC)reply
Then let's wait for the other 50... we have
two trials at the moment... how can we choose one over the other? --➨♀♂CandlewickeST# :) 21:50, 17 February 2009 (UTC)reply
We don't have to. I don't think it is likely that we will get the both verdicts on the same day. --
BorgQueen (
talk) 21:57, 17 February 2009 (UTC)reply
Lots of maybes and unlikelys indeed. Fair enough. --➨♀♂CandlewickeST# :) 22:12, 17 February 2009 (UTC)reply
Venezuelan referendum vote
Chavez won.
[18] Could anyone update a relevant article? Thanks. --
BorgQueen (
talk) 03:14, 16 February 2009 (UTC)reply
Wow, this is some horrible wording. What about mentioning Chavez who is the key person in the whole thing and not mentioning 54% since simple support is enough? --Tone 09:10, 16 February 2009 (UTC)reply
Can you give a bit more specific wording? I think mentioning Chavez will lengthen the blurb too much. --
BorgQueen (
talk) 11:04, 16 February 2009 (UTC)reply
In Venezuela, the voters endorse a proposed amendment to the constitution, lifting term limit on elected officers. (or making possible for Chavez to be elected again+ photo of Chavez). This is as far as I can get it. --Tone 11:45, 16 February 2009 (UTC)reply
The current wording gives the impression that Chavez' re-election is certain. I suggest changing the wording to In
Venezuela, the voters endorse an amendment to the
constitution lifting
term limits on elected offices, enabling
PresidentHugo Chávez(pictured) to stand for re-election at the end of the current term. Or something to that effect.
Pruneautalk 13:22, 16 February 2009 (UTC)reply
Yes. I was going to suggest this news but the source was a tabloid, but now it has been confirmed by BBC so I would say the source is reliable. So many unusual collisions/crashes this month, eh? --
BorgQueen (
talk) 11:00, 16 February 2009 (UTC)reply
It is a good story but I wonder what to write. The collision took place some time ago so it's not recent news. The announcement is what is recent. I don't see the date in the BBC article, anyone knows when exactly the collision happened? --Tone 11:49, 16 February 2009 (UTC)reply
According to the BBC article, "earlier this month." Perhaps we could wait until the press squeezes more info from them. --
BorgQueen (
talk) 12:03, 16 February 2009 (UTC)reply
I wasn't aware of that article, I'll put of information in it now, but have to go out shortly.
Rambo's Revenge(talk) 13:25, 16 February 2009 (UTC)reply
Ok I have added quite a bit to the article. Is it ready yet? If not I'll do some more work when I get back.
Rambo's Revenge(talk) 14:10, 16 February 2009 (UTC)reply
Some science stories.
Lonsdaleite is apparently harder than diamond.
[20] Needs some work, though. --Tone 14:11, 16 February 2009 (UTC)reply
Allow me to quote the story (with bolded emphasis added): "The gemstone lost its title of the 'world's hardest material' some time ago, to man-made nanomaterials of slightly greater toughness. Now a rare natural substance looks likely to leave them all far behind - at 58% harder than diamond." An interesting story though, if it actually occurs. SpencerT♦C 19:23, 16 February 2009 (UTC)reply
Sounds like a gradual occurrence/discovery which would not feature in the news. --➨♀♂CandlewickeST# :) 21:40, 17 February 2009 (UTC)reply
The Galeras vocano eruption seems to be notable enough; an official "red alert" has been issued for the area. Anyone wants to update the article? --
BorgQueen (
talk) 05:18, 15 February 2009 (UTC)reply
Sigh, ok I am updating it. --
BorgQueen (
talk) 07:30, 15 February 2009 (UTC)reply
I don't mean to be rude, and its easy for me to comment since I can barely contribute, but is the eruption of every single volcano considered notable for ITN? On the plus side though, yet another ITN for Colombia and South America... --➨♀♂CandlewickeST# :) 12:42, 15 February 2009 (UTC)reply
Not every single one, but if the eruption caused thousands of people to flee, then yes, I would tend to think it's ITN-worthy. Btw do something about your net connection. --
BorgQueen (
talk) 12:47, 15 February 2009 (UTC)reply
I support the inclusion but next time it's better to wait for a comment or two before posting. I know there's little activity around here sometimes but still ;-) --Tone 12:44, 15 February 2009 (UTC)reply
Bearing in mind that fires are always burning in Russia as the article demonstrates... --➨♀♂CandlewickeST# :) 18:31, 15 February 2009 (UTC)reply
I'm going to have to oppose...this seems more trivial, and after doing some quick research, I find you'd be hard pressed to be able to write 3 quality paragraphs about this. SpencerT♦C 20:26, 15 February 2009 (UTC)reply
That's fine. As I said above it's not even the worst fire in Russia this month... --➨♀♂CandlewickeST# :) 23:11, 15 February 2009 (UTC)reply
The ongoing general strikes over the high cost of living in Guadeloupe and Martinique have continued nonstop for three weeks and show no signs of ending anytime soon. If anything, there is a risk that the strikes could spread to other French territories or even France itself, making the story important outside of the Caribbean. The strikes have paralyzed the economy and tourism industry on both islands and magnified social tensions.
Don't know about this one; it doesn't have an article and I'm just after locating it but I'll leave it here anyway and see what everybody thinks. --➨♀♂CandlewickeST# :) 02:23, 16 February 2009 (UTC)reply
The key word in your first point is "may". With so many medical discoveries that "may" have an effect on HIV/AIDS, cancer, and other diseases, I'm going to have to oppose. SpencerT♦C 02:38, 16 February 2009 (UTC)reply
You're correct. How silly of me, having previously pointed out such dubious wording myself. Thank goodness there is more than one to decide... --➨♀♂CandlewickeST# :) 03:03, 16 February 2009 (UTC)reply
How about this one which we seem to have missed? It would have happened between the U.S. plane crash and the Indian train derailment which are both still on ITN.
The numbers killed in the air raids - 75km west of the provincial capital Goma - make them the deadliest since the arrival of Rwandan forces in January.
However, the Australia stimulus is only approved in the Senate, and I can't currently find an article for it. SpencerT♦C 18:39, 14 February 2009 (UTC)reply
Would something worth 10% of, for some slightly broad examples, Iceland's, Turkey's, Argentina's, Costa Rica's or Mali's GDP make it onto ITN? You also seem a bit uncertain even that it's 10% – which doesn't seem all that high a figure... but any country could sign such a deal so surely you should give a valid reason as to why this is significant to anyone outside the U.S.? --➨♀♂CandlewickeST# :) 14:29, 15 February 2009 (UTC)reply
Isn't it 100% of Mali's economy less than 10% of the U.S. economy? Or something like that. Plus these American companies are outsourced everywhere once the American economy contracts the first things they'll do is too pull out their foreign outsourcing. Of course they are not outsourcing in Europe since labor is expensive there so... –HowardtheDuck 15:33, 15 February 2009 (UTC)reply
So what relevance does it have to the people of Europe? --➨♀♂CandlewickeST# :) 23:17, 15 February 2009 (UTC)reply
If consensus supports, I will update the article. --
BorgQueen (
talk) 09:24, 13 February 2009 (UTC)reply
Good one. Of course, the article needs considerable update first. By the way, should we put this on ITN now or when a more detailed sequence is revealed? --Tone 09:43, 13 February 2009 (UTC)reply
I tend to think it wouldn't harm to feature it now, since an official announcement (scheduled on Darwin's 200th birthday) was made by the institute. But I will wait for consensus first. --
BorgQueen (
talk) 09:47, 13 February 2009 (UTC)reply
Ok, I am working on it. --
BorgQueen (
talk) 15:35, 13 February 2009 (UTC)reply
Updated and posted. --
BorgQueen (
talk) 00:15, 14 February 2009 (UTC)reply
Surely this ought to be above the neanderthal? It has just happened in the last number of hours... --➨♀♂CandlewickeST# :) 00:53, 14 February 2009 (UTC)reply
If its on the same date, we try to put the pictured item on top/as high as possible. SpencerT♦C 18:40, 14 February 2009 (UTC)reply
This may have no relevance to the people of Europe, but it may have relevance to people somewhere else not just in the U.S. Perhaps the people of Europe, or more specifically the European governments, may have an interest concerning on how to prop up their economies. –HowardtheDuck 04:08, 16 February 2009 (UTC)reply
The collision of two satellites was the first time in history, so probably significant enough to be on ITN. Does anyone agree? --
BorgQueen (
talk) 05:35, 12 February 2009 (UTC)reply
Interesting sure. But there was also a discovery of mummies in Egypt recently so I don't know which of those two could be featured. How significant is the discovery anyway? The article says it is interested and unexpected but is it a big breakthrough? I don't know... --Tone 12:16, 13 February 2009 (UTC)reply
It's the first South American discovery of a mass grave of bodies laid out carefully as opposed to just being tossed in a pit. I think they're saying it represents the spread of Christianity to the continent. It's also crucial because it covers a wide age demographic due to the discovery including males and females from all age groups - children to the elderly. I would say it's more significant than the unearthing of a few mummies which would be a more regular occurrence and tend to be linked to royalty more than ordinary folk. --➨♀♂CandlewickeST# :) 18:25, 13 February 2009 (UTC)reply
Not ITN, in my opinion. Tragic for sure but many people get killed every day there. --Tone 07:43, 10 February 2009 (UTC)reply
Correct me if I'm wrong, but Eastern Europeans are by definition not westerners? --
UweBayern (
talk) 14:03, 10 February 2009 (UTC)reply
Europe is ment as West here, presumably. --Tone 14:57, 10 February 2009 (UTC)reply
No. East or west it is still a beheading in a part of the world where this isn't an unusual occurrence. I don't see how important such an incident becomes whether it is the first American, Japanese, German or South African since the last one... all of five minutes ago. I clicked on the link and the first thing that caught my eye were the words "seems to". What a blunder if he was proven to be alive and it was on the Main Page... it could be no better than the fuss over the "deaths" at Obama's inauguration. --➨♀♂CandlewickeST# :) 20:41, 10 February 2009 (UTC)reply
The video has been
confirmed "authentic" since, and the reports suggest that it is one thing to kill locals and another to behead a foreigner and videotape it when his government refused to accept their demands, given the political implications. (Not that I insist, we have plenty of other news to focus on) --
BorgQueen (
talk) 04:00, 11 February 2009 (UTC)reply
We do indeed have plenty to focus on but I'm sorry as I was in a rush at the time, didn't know what was in the news and could only go on what the link was telling me. --➨♀♂CandlewickeST# :) 19:55, 11 February 2009 (UTC)reply
Germany
The new German Federal Minister of Economics,
Karl-Theodor zu Guttenberg, should be included. Germany is the world's 3rd largest economy after all, and similar American appointments have been included on the Main Page. He has now been formally appointed. --
UweBayern (
talk) 14:00, 10 February 2009 (UTC)reply
Ministers in big countries are changed relatively often so I wouldn't include this one. By the way, some time ago we had China becoming 3rd largest economy on ITN ;-) --Tone 14:57, 10 February 2009 (UTC)reply
Hmm...I don't remember us posting any other appointees... SpencerT♦C 01:20, 11 February 2009 (UTC)reply
I was thinking about this one but according to the BBC "Absentee ballots, including everyone from soldiers to diplomats, will only be counted on Thursday"
[22] so I guess we won't get a result until after that.
Rambo's Revenge(talk) 19:36, 10 February 2009 (UTC)reply
More info: The "first official results" will appear tonight and the "final results will come within days".
[23] However I don't have enough ITN experience to know if we can post a story from the first official results tonight.
Rambo's Revenge(talk) 21:15, 10 February 2009 (UTC)reply
We'll see how concrete the results are. If they are enough to determine an accurate victory, we'll probably post. SpencerT♦C 01:19, 11 February 2009 (UTC)reply
Though the mention of children makes the incident more tragic, I don't think it really deserves mention. SpencerT♦C 02:43, 9 February 2009 (UTC)reply
Oh. Why? It seems to be one of the most notable things coming out of South America right now... --➨♀♂CandlewickeST# :) 02:59, 9 February 2009 (UTC)reply
I like the alternative wording by the way. :) --➨♀♂CandlewickeST# :) 03:04, 9 February 2009 (UTC)reply
Just to clarify my misunderstanding - I thought those were two separate comments - one left by an unsigned user. Checking the history has told me otherwise. Now it makes sense. --➨♀♂CandlewickeST# :) 03:07, 9 February 2009 (UTC)reply
Oops, sorry about that. SpencerT♦C 22:31, 9 February 2009 (UTC)reply
Venezuela
Since we're in South America how about the Venezuelan news from yesterday? --➨♀♂CandlewickeST# :) 03:11, 9 February 2009 (UTC)reply
Sigh, probably ought to go to sleep. I somehow managed to mix it in with the Iraq story to produce 11 deaths in Venezuela. The reality doesn't look as notable... --➨♀♂CandlewickeST# :) 03:12, 9 February 2009 (UTC)reply
Australia
Reading
this a second ago told me the death toll has increased to 128. If I mess up a third time I'm going to go to bed... :( --➨♀♂CandlewickeST# :) 03:16, 9 February 2009 (UTC)reply
Death toll even higher now. SpencerT♦C 22:31, 9 February 2009 (UTC)reply
They released the list on 3 Feb but the identifications were made a few days after that, so it's probably not too late. --
BorgQueen (
talk) 10:18, 9 February 2009 (UTC)reply
I'm going to have to oppose. Even though there's detainees formerly from Gitmo, I still don't find it especially notable. SpencerT♦C 22:31, 9 February 2009 (UTC)reply
I've updated yesterday's Malagasy massacre for anyone who wants to post the article back on the Main Page. --➨♀♂CandlewickeST# :) 14:29, 8 February 2009 (UTC)reply
Would anyone object to the Amazon crash going on ITN? Lots of deaths and South America has the least ITNs this year with 2 so far. I would be happy to create it. --➨♀♂CandlewickeST# :) 14:33, 8 February 2009 (UTC)reply
That's nice too but I would prefer the Bolivian news. --
BorgQueen (
talk) 14:54, 8 February 2009 (UTC)reply
Let's have both! :D --➨♀♂CandlewickeST# :) 15:03, 8 February 2009 (UTC)reply
Marian Cozma
Romanian handball player Marian Cozma is killed and two other players suffer serious injuries after a knife attack in Hungarian town of
Veszprém. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Avala (
talk •
contribs)
Um, no. We're not exactly short of options at the minute. --➨♀♂CandlewickeST# :) 17:02, 8 February 2009 (UTC)reply
Unless of course he had some historic effect which changed the world... but he doesn't seem to be quite at the level of
Nelson Mandela or
Lech Wałęsa... --➨♀♂CandlewickeST# :) 17:08, 8 February 2009 (UTC)reply
Ahaha I have fallen of the chair laughing on Mandela comment. Not. The other two players are national team players of Serbia and Croatia. So this has been the main breaking news headlines in four countries -
Hungary,
Romania,
Croatia and
Serbia.--
Avala (
talk) 17:20, 8 February 2009 (UTC)reply
Oh dear, that's very tragic. Nelson will never be able to top that. :P --➨♀♂CandlewickeST# :) 00:35, 9 February 2009 (UTC)reply
Just a comment, the death criteria were recently amended and changed. The newest version is here:
Wikipedia:ITNMP#Deaths.
About the candidate: I wouldn't say that Cozma was a "very important figure in their field of expertise" nor that the "death has a major international impact that affects current events." I'm going to have to oppose.
Also with deaths, the rest of the subject's article needs to be well-filled-in too, and Cozma has very little about anything else he did. SpencerT♦C 02:49, 9 February 2009 (UTC)reply
The article requires a major cleanup and more citations. --
BorgQueen (
talk) 11:36, 7 February 2009 (UTC)reply
Working on it as quick as we can. --
Mattinbgn\talk 11:40, 7 February 2009 (UTC)reply
Adding my support for when it is updated. Fire goes nicely with all this snow. --➨♀♂CandlewickeST# :) 18:50, 7 February 2009 (UTC)reply
The article is a little tidier now, news is still changing rapidly. 25 confirmed fatalities, with more expected later. The town of
Marysville, Victoria has been destroyed. -- 21:50, 7 February 2009 (UTC)~
Good grief! Definitely ITN! :O --➨♀♂CandlewickeST# :) 21:57, 7 February 2009 (UTC)reply
Yes, but can you guys do something about those [citation needed] tags? It won't be too difficult to find news sources. --
BorgQueen (
talk) 22:18, 7 February 2009 (UTC)reply
(unindent)Removed uncited claims. They happened but the media is still focusing on consequences and current threats rather than analysis of causes etc. --
Mattinbgn\talk 22:41, 7 February 2009 (UTC)reply
Check out
the SMH now. Estimates up to 40 dead and fires are still burning out of control. Just adding my support for inclusion. Cheers,
Ben (
talk) 23:34, 7 February 2009 (UTC)reply
Seems to be. We wouldn't require another article yet, would we? Unless there are riots and fires and looting and lots of people dying and in pieces and lots of other graphic extremities? --➨♀♂CandlewickeST# :) 22:05, 7 February 2009 (UTC)reply
Support inclusion by the way. Plus Queensland and Madagascar (below) when ready. --➨♀♂CandlewickeST# :) 03:28, 8 February 2009 (UTC)reply
If an article is created I guess it could be added onto the end of the Victorian bushfires in ITN like we had with the Kenyan fires a while ago... --➨♀♂CandlewickeST# :) 03:20, 8 February 2009 (UTC)reply
Ireland and UK weather: I've updated it at yesterday's date. It is still relevant due to
this just today and
this yesterday-running into today. --➨♀♂CandlewickeST# :) 15:53, 6 February 2009 (UTC)reply
Support. It's just the type of thing I'd expect to find in an up-to-date edition of a decent encyclopedia. --➨♀♂CandlewickeST# :) 18:44, 7 February 2009 (UTC)reply
Posted. I can use FDA logo but somehow I don't think people will like it when they see it on MP. --
BorgQueen (
talk) 18:55, 7 February 2009 (UTC)reply
I could replace the outdated superbowl picture with this one. (
Kanji for "Enten". Ideally it should be in svg format though) Please let me know what you guys think. --
BorgQueen (
talk) 18:10, 5 February 2009 (UTC)reply
For now, I used a Colombian map image instead. --
BorgQueen (
talk) 18:35, 5 February 2009 (UTC)reply
I think that would be a good idea - I was just about to ask you if you were near Tokyo so you could take a photo of his company headquarters. But the symbols certainly make a change from all these images of maps and male politicians we've been having recently. --➨♀♂CandlewickeST# :) 03:05, 6 February 2009 (UTC)reply
Ok, I've converted it to svg, using Inkscape... --
BorgQueen (
talk) 03:14, 6 February 2009 (UTC)reply
Anyone else think we should have something on the Main Page concerning the
February 2009 United Kingdom snowstorm? IMO this is very notable, being the biggest in 18 years. Plus, we had something of the opposite in Australia which went onto the mainpage.
D.M.N. (
talk) 19:59, 5 February 2009 (UTC)reply
I would've supported this but I think it's too late, but as I say here, it's never too late here for UK+ROI stories... –HowardtheDuck 03:03, 6 February 2009 (UTC)reply
No, tisn't at all... anyway there's something odd about this article. I remarked on the talk page at the inclusion of IRE in a UK titled article - if that had gone on the Main Page there would have been uproar... now all the IRE stuff has been removed from what I can see but the opening line says UK + IRE, yet the article is just called UK. The simplest solution would have been to include Ireland in the title and keep the info there. Especially since Ireland is presumably being affected by the same thing as the UK and numerous disruptions have been caused.
I'd support this if all these were included and the title had the word "Ireland" or "Irish". It does go rather nicely with Australia. --➨♀♂CandlewickeST# :) 03:15, 6 February 2009 (UTC)reply
The verb tense used in the first sentence was the past tense so I thought it was pretty much over before it was proposed. –HowardtheDuck 03:18, 6 February 2009 (UTC)reply
Also I wouldn't think it's too late when a major airport was shut down a number of hours ago. --➨♀♂CandlewickeST# :) 03:26, 6 February 2009 (UTC)reply
The article needs to be updated first before this should ever go up. –HowardtheDuck 04:30, 6 February 2009 (UTC)reply
Infrastructure across
Great Britain and
Ireland is disrupted following heavy snowfall (snowfall in London pictured). It was the heaviest snowfall for 18 years across some parts, heaviest for 22 years in other parts. Basicaly it's a mixture of the worst snow depending on different areas and not the overall for Britain and Ireland. I also think that a geographical term would be better for a geographical headline, although a political term of UK and ROI is fine by me. JollyΩJanner 21:38, 6 February 2009 (UTC)reply
The
United States Treasury moves to broaden its debt ranging options to raise the trillions of dollars needed to cope with the current recession.
(Reuters)
Panasonic Corp. announces plans to shut down 27 plants throughout the world and slash 15,000 jobs due to a slump in demand for its electronic products resulting from the
worldwide recession.
(AP via Google News)
The discovery of Titanoboafossil, the biggest snake ever found, is announced. (Any alt wordings are appreciated.) --
BorgQueen (
talk) 19:34, 4 February 2009 (UTC)reply
This seems like a good choice. I support this, although it would be nice if the article (
Titanoboa) was expanded a bit if possible. Thanks,
Anonymous101 (
talk) 20:29, 4 February 2009 (UTC)reply
Expanded a bit, and the citations have been improved as well. --
BorgQueen (
talk) 22:04, 4 February 2009 (UTC)reply
Yes. I noticed it above and was just coming down here to suggest it. This keeps the two linked words apart; I also linked snake in this case as it seems an important word here. Double support for the story being
South American, the most under-represented continent on ITN in January 2009 (apart from
Antarctica). --➨♀♂CandlewickeST# :) 22:07, 4 February 2009 (UTC)reply
Technically they announced the discovery of the snake, just as they announced the discovery of the smallest exoplanet below? --
Stephen 22:44, 4 February 2009 (UTC)reply
That's right, but could you rephrase the blurb in some way that wouldn't look too similar to the exoplanet entry just below? --
BorgQueen (
talk) 22:48, 4 February 2009 (UTC)reply
I originally considered "The discovery in
Columbia of
fossils of the largest
snake currently known, Titanoboa, is announced." But two "ofs" seem a bit messy... and the planet creates a problem too... --➨♀♂CandlewickeST# :) 22:52, 4 February 2009 (UTC)reply
IDEA: Insert "revealed to have been" between the words "are" and "discovered". --➨♀♂CandlewickeST# :) 23:06, 4 February 2009 (UTC)reply
So fixed, except that I used "announced" instead of "revealed". --
BorgQueen (
talk) 23:10, 4 February 2009 (UTC)reply
She was the last British First Rate to be armed entirely with
bronzecannon. [1]
Is there anything other than this that marks the ship out as being special? I find the British weather at the minute more interesting than this story... not nearly as exciting as the discovery of a planet and a fossil... and three discoveries in a row? We had difficulty enough phrasing the second one... --➨♀♂CandlewickeST# :) 23:14, 4 February 2009 (UTC)reply
Does anyone think that
this news is notable enough for ITN? MySpace is used by people all over the world, if I am not mistaken, and "90,000 registered sex offenders" is eyebrow-raising to say the least. The company confirmed it Tuesday so it is probably not too late by the ITN standard. --
BorgQueen (
talk) 23:55, 4 February 2009 (UTC)reply
Eyebrow-raising exactly. But that's how it's designed. The final paragraph:
None of the registered sex offenders found on MySpace have been convicted for actions on the site, Nigam said. Facebook's statement said no sex offenders had been convicted of wrongdoing on its site either.
Incidentally we'd nearly need another image... which would be somewhat sickeningly ironic... :/ --➨♀♂CandlewickeST# :) 00:02, 5 February 2009 (UTC)reply
Since we're going through news stories, how about what's going at
Waterford Crystal? It's a world famous brand, it's about to close, all the workers were suddenly laid off on Friday and have been
staging a
sit-in since, the company is/was
250 years old, it's apparently being reported across the world, has been ongoing for a few days, today there was a
protest in the city and it pretty much symbolises the
sudden downturn in the Irish economy. --➨♀♂CandlewickeST# :) 00:18, 5 February 2009 (UTC)reply
I'm going to say no...there's plenty of rather important businesses all over that are closing, and even with your reasoning, I don't think its overly notable enough. SpencerT♦C 00:32, 6 February 2009 (UTC)reply
The
United Kingdom struggles to cope with its heaviest snowfalls since 1991.
(BBC)
ITN candidates for February 3
Iran announces the launch of its first domestically made satellite Omid into orbit. (Please feel free to suggest alt blurbs.) --
BorgQueen (
talk) 09:57, 3 February 2009 (UTC)reply
OK, two things at first glance. Should the satellite's name be in italics? I seem to remember something about that from the recent Japanese satellite ITN. Also the most problematic word is "made" - it's very bland. I shall now attempt to construct a wording. --➨♀♂CandlewickeST# :) 10:26, 3 February 2009 (UTC)reply
The recent Japanese satellite's name was italicized by
User:Spencer as I recall, although we don't have a guideline on satellite names, AFAIK. I tend to think it's acceptable either way. --
BorgQueen (
talk) 10:30, 3 February 2009 (UTC)reply
It's common practice in the English language to 'italicise' the name of inanimate objects. (e.g. ships, planes). Thus really the name of this one should be as well. --
Daviessimo (
talk) 15:41, 3 February 2009 (UTC)reply
I believe upon my recent perusal of the ITN archives that someone later unitalicised it but that's OK, just pointing that out. --➨♀♂CandlewickeST# :) 10:35, 3 February 2009 (UTC)reply
Don't you think it's a bit overlinked...? --
BorgQueen (
talk) 10:37, 3 February 2009 (UTC)reply
Yes. However it's a matter of word condensing vs. overlinking. I suppose
satellite could go unlinked since it can be found in Omid and is probably contained within
space exploration too. --➨♀♂CandlewickeST# :) 10:42, 3 February 2009 (UTC)reply
Posted, with some de-linking and slight tweaking. Thanks for your help. --
BorgQueen (
talk) 10:44, 3 February 2009 (UTC)reply
Glad to be of assistance. --➨♀♂CandlewickeST# :) 10:51, 3 February 2009 (UTC)reply
I checked the italics, and it doesn't appear to have been removed...I have added them in. SpencerT♦C 22:30, 3 February 2009 (UTC)reply
About time something happened that would have a new image as Miss Prime Minister of Iceland is ever so slowly slipping down the list... --➨♀♂CandlewickeST# :) 01:19, 4 February 2009 (UTC)reply
Perhaps a photo of Holmes, the Super Bowl MVP:
here's an image, but it needs to be cropped. SpencerT♦C 02:07, 4 February 2009 (UTC)reply
I found
a bit more relevant image and used it instead. It is dark (it's not out fault that the game was held in the evening) and not exactly spectacular at 100x100px though. --
BorgQueen (
talk) 02:29, 4 February 2009 (UTC)reply
How about "... in modern times." The world does not have a head of government; that really WOULD be modern. BTW What openly gay head of government are you thinking about in pre-modern times? --
Blake the bookbinder (
talk) 21:19, 1 February 2009 (UTC)reply
I don't think we should feature a cleanup-tagged article on MP. --
BorgQueen (
talk) 16:26, 2 February 2009 (UTC)reply
I don't think the article is in that bad condition, although I can't remove the cleanup tag as that would be a COI. I will attempt tp cleanup some things now though.
Rambo's Revenge(talk) 16:57, 2 February 2009 (UTC)reply
Kirill of Moscow became the Patriarch of the Russian Orthodox Church! Please someone update the article (including moving it to suit his new title) and we have a new entry with a MP-ok picture. --
BorgQueen (
talk) 05:02, 1 February 2009 (UTC)reply
The article has been moved. --
BorgQueen (
talk) 06:40, 1 February 2009 (UTC)reply
I made an article on the January 2009 Gaza attacks, a series of related reprisal attacks targeted at civilians, Israeli informers and members of the
Fatah that occurred during the ceasefire in the current Gazan war. —Anonymous DissidentTalk 09:59, 1 February 2009 (UTC)reply
Posted, along with Rafael's new, nice picture. I have a better one but he's looking to the right in it and flipping is not an option. --
BorgQueen (
talk) 15:16, 1 February 2009 (UTC)reply
Why? There's clearly a delay with the tennis so what valid reason is there for the Super Bowl thingummybob getting instant promotion? Thanks for informing me about Nadal. The wonderful advantage of Wikipedia being that I don't have to check the news for such things... --➨♀♂CandlewickeST# :) 15:06, 1 February 2009 (UTC)reply
As long as the prerequisites are met, this'll be posted as per
WP:ITNSPORTS, just as the Aussie Open. Now that means I'll have to keep off this page for the next 5 days so I won't know who won.
Oh, I know about that. I was just commenting on the slowness that was occurring earlier in the posting of the tennis. --➨♀♂CandlewickeST# :) 01:35, 2 February 2009 (UTC)reply