This is a collection of discussions on the deletion of articles related to Romania. It is one of many
deletion lists coordinated by
WikiProject Deletion sorting. Anyone can help maintain the list on this page.
Adding a new AfD discussion
Adding an AfD to this page does not add it to the main page at
WP:AFD. Similarly, removing an AfD from this page does not remove it from the main page at
WP:AFD. If you want to nominate an article for deletion, go through the process on that page before adding it to this page. To add a discussion to this page, follow these steps:
Edit this page and add {{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PageName}} to the top of the list. Replace "PageName" with the relevant article name, i.e. the one on the existing AFD discussion. Also, indicate the title of the article in the edit summary as it is particularly helpful to add a link to the article in the edit summary. When you save the page, the discussion will automatically appear.
You should also tag the AfD by adding {{subst:delsort|Romania|~~~~}} to it, which will inform editors that it has been listed here. You may place this tag above or below the nomination statement or at the end of the discussion thread.
Closed AfD discussions are automatically removed by
a bot.
Other types of discussions
You can also add and remove other discussions (
prod,
CfD,
TfD etc.) related to Romania. For the other XfD's, the process is the same as AfD (except {{Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/PageName}} is used for MFD and {{transclude xfd}} for the rest). For PRODs, adding a link with {{prodded}} will suffice.
Further information
For further information see Wikipedia's
deletion policy and
WP:AfD for general information about Articles for Deletion, including a list of article deletions sorted by day of nomination.
This list is also part of the larger list of deletion debates related to
Europe.
Archived discussions (starting from September 2007) may be found at:
The information presented here is mostly false. The date the club was founded is wrong, the records are wrong, the history is wrong, former players are wrong, about 80% of the entire article is wrong.
Comment AfD is not for debating the content. It is to establish
WP:notabilty and appropriate WP inclusion/exclusion. Please feel free to correct the info with
WP:reliable sources or reframe the AfD proposal. If the sources are geniune and reliable, btw we might need a conversation about how to use them.
FWIW the article appears to be well written and since the club is in
Liga I and has always been so and have had major success, I !vote keep and cleanup using better and
more reliable sources. If it turns out that these assertions are false then we can reconsider notability— Iadmc♫talk 14:05, 7 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Try the articles in
Wikipedia:Fake news to root out sites that are either satirical or disengenuous and read the project pages to get some idea of what we think about Fake News— Iadmc♫talk 14:14, 7 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Comment: this is an invalid and arguably malicious nomination. As can be seen on the talk pages of this article and various others on related entities, there is a long-running legal dispute. The nom is likely to be proved correct that FCSB will be disassociated from most if not all of the historic achievements of the Steaua Bucharest club in due course, but AFAIK this is not definitive at present in terms of reliable sources stating exactly what can be allocated to whom. Regardless, the FCSB entity is an extant sports club (and won the Romanian championship this season just gone) so is unequivocally a valid topic for an article, and would be still valid as a topic as a means of clarification on the events of the past years even if it were dissolved altogether tomorrow. The nom has seemingly lost their patience in this matter and now simply wants to have all the information deleted rather than have contentious information removed by the proper means and processes.
Crowsus (
talk) 16:04, 7 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Speedy Keep This is a long-standing content dispute, not a deletion rationale. The same user PRODded the page several years ago. It might be time to consider a topic ban.
SportingFlyerT·C 17:13, 7 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Procedural close AfD is absolutely not the right venue for this discussion. User appears to have a partial ban for editing topics related to
FCSB. Invalid nomination.
Jay eyem (
talk) 17:14, 7 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Procedural close – Clearly FCSB inherits the records of FC Steaua Bucharest, being prevented from using the name for bureaucratic reasons.
Svartner (
talk) 23:34, 7 June 2024 (UTC)reply
I am unable to find enough coverage of the subject, a South African rugby union player, to meet
WP:GNG or
WP:SPORTCRIT.
JTtheOG (
talk) 17:39, 6 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete Coverage appears to be limited, although there could be a couple of bits in Romanian or Spanish sources that are less easily accessible. No suitable redirect per
WP:ATD.
Rugbyfan22 (
talk) 18:35, 6 June 2024 (UTC)reply
I could not find any sources to prove that these events took place in the dates mentioned, which would fail
WP:NEVENT.
Cocobb8 (💬
talk • ✏️
contribs) 21:35, 1 June 2024 (UTC)reply
The article is unsourced. I don't see why this topic deserves an article as there are no sources on the Imperium series, only sources on the individual movies.
MKsLifeInANutshell (
talk) 05:07, 22 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, LizRead!Talk! 03:36, 29 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, LizRead!Talk! 03:45, 5 June 2024 (UTC)reply