From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. So Why 07:20, 12 July 2017 (UTC) reply

Royal Sprimont Comblain Sport

Royal Sprimont Comblain Sport (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:ORGDEPTH. - Mr X 15:44, 18 June 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions.  FITINDIA  15:52, 18 June 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Belgium-related deletion discussions.  FITINDIA  15:52, 18 June 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Comment. I don't know if this meets ORGDEPTH or not but I got many results Googling the name of this team. Most are probably scores and stuff but I think that a club founded in 1921 may have some sort of significance and I suggest that this be given time before it is deleted. 331dot ( talk) 15:54, 18 June 2017 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, So Why 07:07, 26 June 2017 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 01:59, 4 July 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. • Gene93k ( talk) 20:02, 11 July 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 20:03, 11 July 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 20:03, 11 July 2017 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.