The result was Delete -- JForget 00:52, 17 March 2008 (UTC) reply
This is very probably original research. Furthermore, I think that the article snowball fight can cover all the subject matter. Cenarium ( talk) 23:58, 15 March 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Speedy Keep (non-admin closure), per WP:SNOW. Meets notability criteria. SilkTork * YES! 17:46, 18 March 2008 (UTC) reply
I believe there is a case for this article to be removed as it has little to no information contained with in it, also he has never played a professional game and no source for weather or not he has played for the national team mentioned. Skitzo ( talk) 23:28, 15 March 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus. ➨ REDVEЯS is a satellite and will be set alight 10:09, 25 March 2008 (UTC) reply
IP removed PROD. PROD read: "...this cites no references, and Wikipedia is not a dictionary" - Listing as a courtesy; I have no opinion on it. Scarian Call me Pat 23:02, 15 March 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Speedy delete by User:Toddst1, non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ( Broken clamshells• Otter chirps) 23:18, 15 March 2008 (UTC) reply
This article is a complete hoax, fails WP:BIO and WP:N, this is obviously a fictional character as there are no google hits and the myspace is a dud.-- TrU Co -X 22:51, 15 March 2008 (UTC) reply
Delete per nom. Unsourced and unreferenced - clearly a hoax. Dreamspy ( talk) 23:04, 15 March 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Merge to Full Metal Panic! as not notable on its own. Davewild ( talk) 20:49, 21 March 2008 (UTC) reply
Delete as per WP:V. Though it's a newly created article but it seems totally unverifiable and unreferenced claim. Thus nominating for AfD. -- Niaz (Talk • Contribs) 22:34, 15 March 2008 (UTC) reply
There is a article on the ship in the spanish wikipedia articles ( http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/TTD-1), so I don't see why there shouldn't be one in english. This one may not be much yet, but... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Battlestar atlantis ( talk • contribs) 01:40, 16 March 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete per WP:SNOW -- JForget 00:54, 17 March 2008 (UTC) reply
Delete as per WP:BIO. Though the article highly spoke on his achievements but google is saying something different [2]. Clearly fails at BIO. -- Niaz (Talk • Contribs) 22:26, 15 March 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete, consensus is the article fails the relevant notability guideline. Davewild ( talk) 20:46, 21 March 2008 (UTC) reply
Delete as per WP:BIO. The appeared in a TV episode and is auditioning for a title role (uncertain!), that's what her achievement. Clearly fails at BIO. -- Niaz (Talk • Contribs) 22:21, 15 March 2008 (UTC) reply
Delete per nom. Who? Clearly a vanity article. Should not get her 15 mins of fame here! Dreamspy ( talk) 23:08, 15 March 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete -- JForget 00:55, 17 March 2008 (UTC) reply
Delete as per WP:N. Though this article says it is in the middle of expansion, but it clearly fails at WP:Notability. Thousands of such forum exist on the web. Just because of the expansion tag, I am tagging it for AfD otherwise I would tag it for Speedy. -- Niaz (Talk • Contribs) 22:15, 15 March 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Merge to Red Planet (film), consensus is that it that it not independently notable but a merge is possible. Davewild ( talk) 20:38, 21 March 2008 (UTC) reply
Main antagonist of Red Planet, sure; however, no notability outside that film. Fails WP:FICT. Master of Puppets Call me MoP!☺ 21:26, 15 March 2008 (UTC) reply
I created the page simply because i believed that perhaps some viewers of the film would feel the need to know more about the ideas contained in it's script. We live in a world fueled by technology and many of us look towards the future in order to imagine the conception of machines such as AMEE, and seeing an advanced robotic life form would urge them to discover more about how it works, and about it's "attitude". After seeing the page for the Red Planet film, i noticed that the information given on the AMEE character was quite superficial, as was the information given in the film itself. With a page for the character in general, people could find out more about it and on how it functions, and therefore understand exactly how a conception of a robot could truly become a human creation in the future, which is why i thought that it's page had a use. However, if the Wikipedia Staff have decided that there is no true need for the page to exist, even after various editings and changes, I believe that i must simply accept that. If anyone else believes that this page has a right to stay, feel free to address your opinions. -- TøM ( talk) 09:55, 16 March 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Keep, sources have been found to establish notability. Davewild ( talk) 20:33, 21 March 2008 (UTC) reply
NN "professional wrestler". Google gives me nothing except a few YouTube videos. No reliable secondary sources to be found. IceCreamAntisocial ( talk) 21:04, 15 March 2008 (UTC) reply
-- hyperbeard ( Talk - Contribs) 18:23, 16 March 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Keep (non-admin closure), AfD withdrawn by nominator. No longer a copyvio problem. clpo13( talk) 07:19, 16 March 2008 (UTC) reply
Apart from its markup, this is an exact copy of an article published in The Cricket Society Journal in 2006 and is probably a breach of copyright. Even if it does not breach copyright it should be completely rewritten in an objective and encyclopaedic style. But, as the original author seems to have left Wikipedia, it is doubtful if that will happen, so probably best to just delete it. JamesJJames ( talk) 20:57, 15 March 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. Nandesuka ( talk) 12:27, 21 March 2008 (UTC) reply
Advertising with little redeeming value. It has no assertion of notability, and was obviously written by the company that owns the site, the Texas Engineering Extension Service (the creator was User:Teexreviewer). -- BlastOButter42 See Hear Speak 20:42, 15 March 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. per WP:SNOW - Milk's Favorite Cookie 14:11, 16 March 2008 (UTC) reply
A punk band that, unusually for a punk band, set out to shock> Oh, wait, no that's normal isn't it? They had a few minor hits on the indie charts (note: indie charts have much lower sales numbers than the main chart). At least, the article says they did, there are no cited sources for that. There is some stuff out there for a band of this name, but no indication it's the same band. Guy ( Help!) 20:33, 15 March 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was already deleted. -- Reinoutr ( talk) 21:32, 15 March 2008 (UTC) reply
Neologism not supported by, well, anything. Delicious carbuncle ( talk) 20:25, 15 March 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was keep per WP:SNOW. Canley ( talk) 00:09, 16 March 2008 (UTC) reply
Article fails WP:N, has no references, doesn't even have a date of birth. K im u 20:09, 15 March 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete -- JForget 00:56, 17 March 2008 (UTC) reply
Film character is not notable by any means; simply the main character in a box office bomb, and not much else can be said in this article about the character. – Dream out loud ( talk) 20:01, 15 March 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete, unverified aand notability not established with original research concerns. Davewild ( talk) 20:24, 21 March 2008 (UTC) reply
AfD'd per private request. According to the request, the article is WP:OR and has no references. Listing out of courtesy; I have no opinion on it. Scarian Call me Pat 19:47, 15 March 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete, as the notability guideline on future films says films should not have their own articles until it has been confirmed by reliable sources that shooting has begun. Davewild ( talk) 20:20, 21 March 2008 (UTC) reply
Fails WP:NFF. Girolamo Savonarola ( talk) 23:16, 9 March 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Keep, consensus is that the article has value with a move to another title being a possibility - which is an editorial decision. Davewild ( talk) 20:14, 21 March 2008 (UTC) reply
Unencyclopedic content/listcruft. This article is nothing but a list of subjectively selected titles of books about Joan of Arc, with absolutely no information about the books given - it serves as nothing better than a library record, if that. If these books are deemed useful, they should be used as references to improve the articles relating to Joan of Arc, not to create an article with no utility. The one citation that is actually in the article claims that there are over 12,000 titles on Joan in French alone - this still does not tell us the validity of the works herein contained, and to do so would likely violate NOR. The subjectivity required in a "selected bibliography" means this will never be an encyclopedic article, nor will it be anything other than a incomplete list of titles, which can just as easily be located through Amazon or Google. MSJapan ( talk) 19:22, 15 March 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was No Consensus, defaulting to Keep, Delete opinions feel this will always be original research while keep opinions feel it can be cleaned up and sourced to avoid OR. As this defaults to keep strongley suggest it is cleaned up and sourced or am sure it will be renominated in the future. Davewild ( talk) 20:07, 21 March 2008 (UTC) reply
Fully unreferenced, and possibly original research. This also seems to be an expanded trivia section. Many of these bits, if properly sourced, might work in the articles about their various sections, but somehow I don't see it happening. SchuminWeb ( Talk) 19:22, 15 March 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Deleted under WP:CSD#G7 - author blanked the page after AFD nomination. Pedro : Chat 20:09, 15 March 2008 (UTC) reply
Contested Prod. Seems a puff piece with few reliable sources available to turn it into something encyclopedic - procedural. Pedro : Chat 18:47, 15 March 2008 (UTC) reply
Delete... And merge into an article about Lebanese political parties. I googled this name and there seems to be a Republican Party, a National Liberal Party, and no listing exactly as this name appears. Renee ( talk) 19:41, 15 March 2008 (UTC) reply
}
The result was Redirect to Earth Kingdom, any sourced, useful information (of which I don't think there is much) may be merged there. Black Kite 17:58, 22 March 2008 (UTC) reply
There is really no need to list every minor location in the Earth Kingdom just because they appeared once in an episode. In fact, this article is almost as useless as List of Avatar: The Last Airbender creatures, which is also nominated for deletion. Parent5446( Murder me for my actions) 18:19, 15 March 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was No Consensus defaulting to Keep, Disagreement over whether it meets the notability guideline. Davewild ( talk) 20:00, 21 March 2008 (UTC) reply
Non notable botanical garden. Mister Senseless™ ( Speak - Contributions) 18:13, 15 March 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was SPEEDY DELETE as no context and copyvio. ... discospinster talk 19:19, 15 March 2008 (UTC) reply
Unencyclopedic, barely an article, notability not established Corvus Fox ( talk) 18:06, 15 March 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Keep, consensus is that the references identified here establish notability. Davewild ( talk) 19:54, 21 March 2008 (UTC) reply
Article fails WP:NOTABILITY Hu12 ( talk) 17:56, 15 March 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was SPEEDY DELETE. ... discospinster talk 19:48, 15 March 2008 (UTC) reply
Memorial page for non-notable teacher. Speedy tag removed. Heavy Seltzer ( talk) 17:54, 15 March 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete, consensus is that the article fails the relevant notability guideline. Davewild ( talk) 19:52, 21 March 2008 (UTC) reply
Band, apparently with no albums, has some press. Possibly future notable band. Delicious carbuncle ( talk) 17:53, 15 March 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete -- JForget 00:59, 17 March 2008 (UTC) reply
I found this after commenting on the AfD for The Meth Song. I clearly remember seeing this PSA as a kid, but I'm not sure that its notable, and its been marked as being unsourced since November. A google search only turns up copyvio videos on Youtube and Retrojunk. Mister Senseless™ ( Speak - Contributions) 17:23, 15 March 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. per WP:SNOW (non-admin) - Milk's Favorite Cookie 23:27, 16 March 2008 (UTC) reply
This article a fork from the Alcoholics Anonymous article. There are some issues with how the article is written now (style, MOS, etc), but those can be corrected. If it's going to stay, it should be renamed something like Effectiveness of Alcoholics Anonymous, as was done when the history section of the Alcoholics Anonymous article was forked ( History of Alcoholics Anonymous). The articles cited here are almost exclusively limited to discussing the effectiveness of Alcoholics Anonymous and not all twelve-step programs (e.g. it would not apply to Debtors Anonymous, Overeaters Anonymous, etc). Scarpy ( talk) 17:09, 15 March 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Keep Non-admin closure RoninBK T C 14:04, 20 March 2008 (UTC)" reply
De-proded and moved to AfD. Should probably be merged with
List of Macintosh software.
Klausness (
talk) 17:03, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
reply
*Merge, preferably with its' own section to indicate it's age. Although, again, it should be noted that
the proposed article to merge to is up for deletion.
Cel
Talk to me 17:21, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
reply
The result was Keep, consensus is that it just about passes the notability guideline. Davewild ( talk) 09:08, 23 March 2008 (UTC) reply
Please Delete. This is an unimportant book. It was presumably added to Wikipedia in the mistaken belief that it was written by George Ellis the cosmologist. In fact it was written by another George Ellis, the co-founder and managing editor of "The Heckler". See http://www.theheckler.com/store/shop/item.aspx?itemid=11 PedroElls ( talk) 16:40, 15 March 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Keep No editor advocated deletion, merge can be WP:BOLDly completed by any editor. Non-admin closure -- RoninBK T C 14:11, 20 March 2008 (UTC) reply
Moved from prod to AfD. Suggest merge to List of Macintosh software, which is actually a useful list. Also, those huge icons add nothing, so they should be removed if a merge is done. Klausness ( talk) 16:55, 15 March 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Redirect to Carlos Oliveira as (a) a plausible typo, and (b) to keep the history so that anything relevant can be merged into that article. Black Kite 18:05, 22 March 2008 (UTC) reply
Article should be deleted as it pertains to a non-notable subject (see WP:N). The content is written in an exclusively in-universe perspective, and does not contain any real-world information (see WP:WAF). Additionally, the article does not contain any reliable third party sources to verify its content (see WP:A). ShadowJester07 ►Talk 16:30, 15 March 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete, consensus is the character is not notable. Davewild ( talk) 19:47, 21 March 2008 (UTC) reply
Speedy delete based on !vote for deletion @ Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brad Armstrong (Home and Away) Good King Wenceslaus ( talk) 16:06, 15 March 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Speedy delete by User:Jimfbleak, non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ( Broken clamshells• Otter chirps) 16:00, 15 March 2008 (UTC) reply
Delete- Does not appear to pass notability guidelines; can't find any reliable sources on this individual. Possibly a hoax. Beloved Freak 15:37, 15 March 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. WjB scribe 09:26, 21 March 2008 (UTC) reply
Delete as per NOR. Clear case of original research. -- Niaz (Talk • Contribs) 15:05, 15 March 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Keep, consensus is that does meet the relevant notability guideline but needing a good rewrite and cleanup to address the problems identified here. Davewild ( talk) 19:41, 21 March 2008 (UTC) reply
Delete as per WP:ORG and WP:N. I believe very close to speedy! -- Niaz (Talk • Contribs) 15:02, 15 March 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Speedy delete by User:Jimfbleak, non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ( Broken clamshells• Otter chirps) 16:02, 15 March 2008 (UTC) reply
Delete as per WP:N, WP:V and WP:BIO. Only page that Google returns is this article. No extra off-line reference exists in the article to support its notability. -- Niaz (Talk • Contribs) 15:00, 15 March 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy delete Toddst1 ( talk) 11:55, 21 March 2008 (UTC) reply
A non-notable poet and artist. Eleassar my talk 14:55, 15 March 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Keep. This article is still quite an ugly mess, but AfD is not cleanup, and at the very least the notability concerns have been addressed, and consensus seems apparent. Non-admin closure -- RoninBK T C 14:27, 20 March 2008 (UTC) reply
Delete as per WP:N. Though it is very old but still it fails at notability. A book available on Google book talks about this resort but that doesn't establish its notability. In that case we may need to add all the resorts available in the world! -- Niaz (Talk • Contribs) 14:46, 15 March 2008 (UTC) reply
KEEP!!!! it will undoubtedly be added to over time, with more specific references, and the information presented is accurate (based on watching the PBS show California's Gold, which dedicated an entire episode to the topic).
The result was delete. WjB scribe 09:25, 21 March 2008 (UTC) reply
Not only does this appear to be a pure advert (and has already been flagged as such, but it also appears to be a violation of WP:NOT#HOWTO. I also have doubts about notability. CultureDrone ( talk) 18:21, 8 March 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete all, notability not established. Davewild ( talk) 19:30, 21 March 2008 (UTC) reply
Non-notable fictional character per WP:FICT. Article creator (who is incidentally the character's creator) removed the prod tag, so I'm moving it here. Lordjeff06 ( talk) 13:53, 15 March 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete, consensus is that the article fails the relevant notability guideline. Davewild ( talk) 19:27, 21 March 2008 (UTC) reply
An unreleased demo album. These typically fail the inclusion criteria; see WP:MUSIC#Albums. PROD was contested. B. Wolterding ( talk) 12:56, 15 March 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete, consensus is that the articles fails the relevant notability guideline. Davewild ( talk) 19:23, 21 March 2008 (UTC) reply
simply being a President of ALSF is not sufficient, otherwise all previous presidents should have Wikipedia articles. A few media mentions does not satisfy substantial achievement required for notability
Delete Fails WP:BIO specifically: The person has received significant recognized awards or honors. The person has made a widely recognized contribution that is part of the enduring historical record in his or her specific field. Tim Andrews is not very well known outside student politics circles. Only passing mentions in mainstream media. Andrews is also not an elected politician as the article creator incorrectly gave him the category of Australian politician. Michellecrisp ( talk) 12:46, 15 March 2008 (UTC) reply
Michellecrisp ( talk) 12:07, 16 March 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Nandesuka ( talk) 12:36, 21 March 2008 (UTC) reply
WP:PROD was removed. Remover claims article meets notability. I think not. So thats why i'm going for AfD. Also, the character is already fully covered in List of Rugrats characters and List of All Grown Up! characters. Bruce Willis one off voice contribution already covered in Rugrats Go Wild article. For the record, my vote is Delete. TheProf | Talk 12:19, 15 March 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete, consensus is that it fails the relevant notability guideline. Davewild ( talk) 19:17, 21 March 2008 (UTC) reply
Non-notable album by a non-notable group (whose article was deleted via AfD). Fails WP:MUSIC#Albums. Prod removed without comment by article's creator. — Hello, Control Hello, Tony 11:13, 15 March 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete, consensus is that the article fails the relevant notability guideline. Davewild ( talk) 12:17, 22 March 2008 (UTC) reply
An underground band from Slovenia. No coverage. Eleassar my talk 10:54, 15 March 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was merged into Nipissing University. ➨ REDVEЯS paints a vulgar picture 20:38, 28 March 2008 (UTC) reply
The entire text of the article: The Nipissing University Student Union represents undergraduate students at Nipissing University in North Bay, Ontario & Muskoka, Ontario, Canada. They are members of the Canadian Federation of Students. I redirected this non-notable organization to its university, and was reversed by an editor who strongly believes in the notability of all student unions. I anticipate that the debate on this will be characterized by a variety of off-topic comments, let's hope I am wrong. This organization fails WP:N and WP:ORG. Paddy Simcox ( talk) 10:36, 15 March 2008 (UTC) reply
- Student union legal squabble settled at Nipissing University
- Sudbury Star (ON) - 02-17-2007 - 259 words
- Ken Sitter - They may not have kissed, but they have made up. Nipissing University Student Union president Sean Feretycki, former president Kyle Marsh and student union general manager Todd Fearnley announced a settlement
- Students angry as tuition rises: Nipissing University board approv...
- North Bay Nugget (ON) - Final - 05-05-2006 - 368 words
- Jennifer Hamilton-McCharles - Nipissing University students voiced opposition against a four per cent tuition hike approved by the university's board of governors Thursday. The tuition increase will mean first year arts and science
- Students protest pricey education
- North Bay Nugget (ON) - 02-15-2007 - 571 words
- bryn weese - Students at Nipissing University are running out of money, and they have the debts to prove it. Many took the opportunity Wednesday to write down the amount of money they owe
- Tests, homework . . . and legal fees
- North Bay Nugget (ON) - 01-20-2007 - 891 words
- BRYN WEESE - in their wildest dreams, or worst nightmares, did Kyle Marsh and Kyra Knapp think their university experience would include being sued for $425,000. The two history students, along with the
- Students protest after being shut out of NUSU meeting
- North Bay Nugget (ON) - 01-20-2007 - 284 words
- Gord Young - About 15 students protested outside a closed-door meeting at the Education Centre Friday, claiming Nipissing University Student Union has flouted the principles of openness and transparency. The students, frustrated at
- Students voice frustration over high cost of tuition: Small group ...
- North Bay Nugget (ON) - Final - 03-04-2006 - 397 words
- Jennifer Hamilton-McCharles - if the province decides to lift a tuition freeze. The 18-year-old first-year Nipissing University student was one of six protesters outside Nipissing MPP Monique Smith's office Friday
- Nipissing University unfairly judged by Maclean's
- North Bay Nugget (ON) - Final - 11-14-2005 - 404 words
- Tom Condotta - 's ranking of Canadian universities released a week ago Sunday. I am a fourth-year student at Nipissing and confused by the rankings. Why did I leave Brampton to study in
- Nipissing University opens new facility
- North Bay Nugget (ON) - Final - 09-11-2000 - 219 words
- Nipissing University athletes finally have their own facility to call home. The $3.5-million Nipissing University Student Athletic Centre, which was funded primarily through student fees, will officially be opened
- Shinerama raises $13,000
- North Bay Nugget (ON) - 09-10-2007 - 431 words
- BY BRANDI CRAMER - North Bay glittered Saturday as more than 300 Nipissing University and Canadore College students took to the streets for the 43rd annual Shinerama. Shoe shines, car washes, barbecues, even odd jobs
- Students face 4.5% tuition hike: Universities brace for hit to fin...
- North Bay Nugget (ON) - Final - 03-09-2006 - 551 words
- Maria Calabrese - put them deeper in debt to pay for a tuition increase this fall, says a Nipissing University Student Union executive. "Even if you make it so students can take out more
- Pub limits underage students: The Wall's liquor licence threatened
- North Bay Nugget (ON) - Final - 01-31-2006 - 488 words
- Tara Bowie - Underage students at Nipissing University and Canadore College have been banned from their school pub after 6 p.m. Student councils which oversee the operation of The Wall made the decision
- Campus eatery's controversial sign relegated to the garbage bin
- North Bay Nugget (ON) - Final - 08-30-2002 - 600 words
- Phil Novak - A jackass has been kicked off The Wall at the Nipissing University-Canadore College on-campus pub. The oversized donkey's posterior and its grinning four-legged owner are prominently featured
- NUSU GM sends cease, desist letter to students
- North Bay Nugget (ON) - 12-20-2006 - 376 words
- bryn weese - Nipissing University Student Union's general manager, Todd Fearnley, has hired a lawyer to challenge statements by students he claims are defamatory. A letter dated Nov. 29 was sent to Kyra
- Statements challenged
- Kirkland Lake Northern News (ON) - 12-22-2006 - 348 words
- BrynWeese - Nipissing University Student Union's general manager, Todd Fearnley, has hired a lawyer to challenge statements by students he claims are defamatory.A letter dated Nov. 29 was sent to Kyra
- International flavours focus of annual food fair
- North Bay Nugget (ON) - 02-09-2007 - 546 words
- Ken Sitter - to taste their efforts and the efforts of others, said organizer Melissa Toupin Laforge of Nipissing University, and raise money to support the World University Service of Canada (WUSC) Student Refugee
- Students complete successful food drive
- North Bay Nugget (ON) - 09-11-2006 - 485 words
- Brandi Cramer The Nugget - North Bay's pavement Sunday to ensure their comrades in need won't go hungry. Nipissing University and Canadore College student leaders gathered participating freshmen and went door to door in
- Food bank's shelves emptying: Canadore, Nipissing students put out...
- North Bay Nugget (ON) - Final - 02-04-2003 - 625 words
- Brandi Cramer - Nipissing University president Dave Marshall is not surprised students may need to rely on the food bank to get through the academic year. "The best they are going to earn (at
- Students shine in annual fundraiser: Largest-ever effort meets goa...
- North Bay Nugget (ON) - Final - 09-09-2002 - 488 words
- Jennifer Hamilton-McCharles - With help from 450 Canadore College and Nipissing University students, the local effort was able to meet the $16,000 goal. "We raised more than $14,000 Saturday and we have
- Marshall returns to hand out awards
- North Bay Nugget (ON) - 03-22-2007 - 265 words
- BRYN WEESE - For the fourth time in as many years, former Nipissing University president Dave Marshall returned to his old stomping grounds to help recognize the leadership abilities of nearly 30 students. The
- Money worries hit students hard
- North Bay Nugget (ON) - 10-06-2006 - 304 words
- Jennifer Hamilton-McCharles - The needs of Nipissing University students are different than five years ago, says the executive director of student affairs. Al Carfagnini made a presentation to Nipissing's board of governors, Thursday
On that basis, I say keep. -- Eastmain ( talk) 22:18, 16 March 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy delete per CSD A7. — Scott5114 ↗ [EXACT CHANGE ONLY] 19:50, 15 March 2008 (UTC) reply
An underground band. No independent sources. Eleassar my talk 10:32, 15 March 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete; deletion arguments wwere sound, and keeps were based on liking it or the general notion that the subject was notable. The three references provided in this AfD are not reliable sources. One is a fanclub, one is a public reviewer site with a content disclaimer, and the last does not provide context for notability. Jerry talk ¤ count/logs 07:23, 22 March 2008 (UTC) reply
An underground, not notable band. No independent sources. Eleassar my talk 10:22, 15 March 2008 (UTC) reply
"Devil Doll has to be one of the most bizarre, frightening, confronting and satisfying bands in existance." Source: http://www.dark-muzik.com/articles/devildoll.htm
"Shagrath's ( Dimmu Borgir) musical influences are Devil Doll and Rob Zombie" Source: http://www.movietome.com/people/340964/dimmu-borgir/trivia.html
"An absolute masterpiece!" Source: http://www.metal-observer.com/articles.php?lid=1&sid=1&id=151
Line-up/Musicians:
WITH:
Source: http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=263
J3az6u ( talk) 16:17, 21 March 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete, but without prejudice for recreation of sources can be found. If anybody finds sources and wants to re-create, feel free to contact me for the text of the deleted article. Sarcasticidealist ( talk) 21:45, 23 March 2008 (UTC) reply
Not notable, underground band. Eleassar my talk 10:13, 15 March 2008 (UTC) reply
http://www.wrappedinwire.com/C/CopticRain.htm
http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=10:hpfqxqehldje~T1
http://www.aracnet.com/~jester/review/coptic.rain-1.html
http://www.aracnet.com/~jester/review/coptic.rain-2.html
http://www.mladina.si/tednik/200116/clanek/plosce-04/
http://www.studiod.si/si/novice/glasba/?oid=4451
http://www.mladina.si/tednik/200226/clanek/plosce-02/
http://www.adp.fdv.uni-lj.si/kiber/texts/ravesu/ravesu.html
http://www.platinum-celebs.com/song/324405/across-the-universe/
J3az6u ( talk) 18:28, 22 March 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Daniel ( talk) 15:02, 19 March 2008 (UTC) reply
Non-notable artist. 18 Google hits. Of the references in the article, three offer one sentence mentions or are mere listings, one doesn't mention her, and the Globe and Mail article (to be found free here) looks promising at first, but is actually an article about the Chelsea Hotel which mentions her in its first paragraph. Iain99 Balderdash and piffle 10:04, 15 March 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. Rjd0060 ( talk) 19:07, 20 March 2008 (UTC) reply
Pseudo-science / new age twaddle. Not quite original research because the author has already published it here but thinks, for some strange reason, that removing the external link makes the article all right. -- RHaworth ( Talk | contribs) 08:55, 15 March 2008 (UTC) reply
Reference:-
[9]
The good thing about Wikipedia is its providing the freedom for bringing past knowledge into the present in preparation for a new age (of peace)for mankind.
The writer removed the link because it did go to a personal website so it could be seen as personal opinion as it obviously has. However the writer assures the gentleman who has opted for its deletion that the article draws on past wisdoms of mankind and cites the above reference as a starting point.
The writer would like the article to stay but can only now leave it up to Wikipedia to be the judge. Ddoorr ( talk) 10:40, 15 March 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was No Consensus, defaulting to Keep, cannot see any consensus on whether this is just a short term news story and thus meeting WP:NOT#NEWS or if the coverage is significant enough to merit its own article or if it should be merged somewhere. Davewild ( talk) 19:02, 21 March 2008 (UTC) reply
Wikipedia articles are not for news reports. This article is merely a rehash of news reports about a non-notable story of transient and purely local interest (boy suspended from school for having candy), and it is written in the style of a news report itself. Possibly transwiki to Wikinews, if it is significant enough for that project, which I doubt. Sandstein ( talk) 08:37, 15 March 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy deleted per author request. Sandstein ( talk) 08:40, 15 March 2008 (UTC) reply
Unencyclopaedic, non-notable, empty article, advertisement; to wit:I created this article more than a year ago when I still worked for this company. It has not been filled out by anyone, and after leaving the company and being able to evaluate the article in a less-biased perspective, I have determined that it is non-notable (considering there is nothing on it and nothing that could really be added to it that wouldn't constitute anything more than an advertisement) and consequently have listed it at AfD. Lumbergh ( talk) 07:48, 15 March 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy delete as a copyright violation of http://www.brookmanstamps.com/IndianStampIntro.html with no clean version to revert to. nancy (talk) 16:12, 15 March 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete, unverified and notability not established. Davewild ( talk) 18:48, 21 March 2008 (UTC) reply
Notability and verifiability in question. Google search (Philippines only) did not give substantial verifiable sources. Article has no cited sources since April 2007. Also the creator might have COI Lenticel ( talk) 06:52, 15 March 2008 (UTC) reply
Comment. I may be out of step, but I don't like COI as grounds for deletion. Someone with a COI could write a NPOV article and someone without could write a POV one. I prefer to judge on notability. Surely justice is blind? Annamonckton ( talk) 14:21, 15 March 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete, Snow close. ^ demon [omg plz] 17:39, 16 March 2008 (UTC) reply
This article fails Wikipedia:No original research. Zero Ghits. Speedy tag and prod removed by creator without discussion and without attempting to address this issue. Dethme0w ( talk) 05:48, 15 March 2008 (UTC) reply
I am a complete newbie at this. I am trying to flesh out the article but whenever I save a few sentences I am having the computer try to delete it! How do I get this set aside so I can finish it properly? Alephhermetic ( talk) 05:52, 15 March 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete; no prejudice to recreation of a sourced article that demonstrates the subject's notability. Black Falcon ( Talk) 04:28, 21 March 2008 (UTC) reply
Non-notable curious phenomenon. Sole source is a YouTube video and we all know how reliable these are. In fact I have had no luck in finding serious discussion about it so for all we know, the video might be a fake or the phenomenon might be simply man-made for one purpose or another. Pichpich ( talk) 05:41, 15 March 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Speedy delete by User:Jeepday, non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ( Broken clamshells• Otter chirps) 14:09, 15 March 2008 (UTC) reply
Non-notable neologism. Prod tag removed by anonymous user without comment. Zero ghits, apart from Wikipedia, and no sources or references provided to assert notability or even the existance of this word. Lankiveil ( speak to me) 05:40, 15 March 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Speedy Delete per WP:CSD#A7 - no notability asserted in any revision. Pedro : Chat 14:50, 15 March 2008 (UTC) reply
Full German name has 4 hits, while the English has 8. Some appear reliable but is a press release from the parent org (that doesn't establish notability anyway), this is a one sentence mention, this is a personal site with a one line mention of a paper at a conference.... It asserts that it's 'known' under the German acronym MERK but filtering the search to eliminate Merck shows lots of false positives and no assertion of notability for this conference. TRAVELLINGCARI My story Tell me yours 04:56, 15 March 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. Rjd0060 ( talk) 19:03, 20 March 2008 (UTC) reply
Wow! It has 3! diving boards. I'm *so* excited. And Google is in absolute awe of this pool with it's comprehensive 10 ghits, than I cannot even begin to imagine how we could ever begin to call this entirely not notable. TRAVELLINGCARI My story Tell me yours 04:44, 15 March 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete as non-notable. No reliable sources provided. Hersfold ( t/ a/ c) 01:53, 21 March 2008 (UTC) reply
Speedy was declined following article's creation a year ago and don't think it's eligible a second time. Nonetheless, this is nothing but advertising, just maybe not 'blatant. So, no evidence of RS coverage and 48 ghits are: download links, forum discussions, You Tubes and other non reliable sources. No evidence that this passes WP:WEB in the slightest. TRAVELLINGCARI My story Tell me yours 04:36, 15 March 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete as non-notable. Hersfold ( t/ a/ c) 01:47, 21 March 2008 (UTC) reply
Non-notable church Corvus cornix talk 04:01, 15 March 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete as non-notable. Hersfold ( t/ a/ c) 01:44, 21 March 2008 (UTC) reply
Non-notable photographer Corvus cornix talk 03:41, 15 March 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Keep and cleanup. Hersfold ( t/ a/ c) 01:14, 21 March 2008 (UTC) reply
I don't know about this one. Half the article seems like it was copied directly out of the instruction manual. The rest appears to be original research. Beyond issues of verifiability and that the article lacks any valid secondary sources, I'm not even sure this product is really notable. At the very least, this needs a complete rewrite. Mister Senseless™ ( Speak - Contributions) 03:05, 15 March 2008 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was Keep. Stifle ( talk) 00:44, 9 April 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. Rjd0060 ( talk) 18:58, 20 March 2008 (UTC) reply
Subject does not satisfy WP:BIO; does not seem to be a notable architect; no major contributions except for his design of the train station in Gary, Indiana. – Dream out loud ( talk) 02:00, 15 March 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete -- JForget 01:01, 17 March 2008 (UTC) reply
Young man whose 15 minute of fame are long over. Only claim to notability was a brief issue with a teacher at his local high school. Jmlk 1 7 01:44, 15 March 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was userfied to User:Elucubro/Kori Carothers.
I would like the article Kori Carothers deleted. I want to go through the tutorial thoroughly before I do anything else and I would like to contact the musician or her representative before I do anything else. Then I will start over. Thank you, Elu --Carpe Diem! 00:49, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
The above comment was mistakenly placed on the AfD log itself by Elucubro ( talk · contribs). This is simply a procedural nomination. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ( Broken clamshells• Otter chirps) 00:53, 15 March 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete -- JForget 01:03, 17 March 2008 (UTC) reply
Contested prod (no reason given). Fails WP:BIO#Athletes as he has never played in a fully professional league. пﮟოьεԻ 5 7 00:52, 15 March 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete per WP:SNOW and CSDs G1 and G3 - this seems to be patent nonsense and borderline vandalism given its clear unsuitability. Nick Dowling ( talk) 07:24, 15 March 2008 (UTC) reply
Prod contested by IP address. Prod nomination reasoning: "Unencyclopedic, lack of notability. Likely socially irrelevant". I find it difficult to disagree. Delete. Daniel ( talk) 04:07, 15 March 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Speedy Keep clearly notable, bad faith nomination. (closed by a non-administrator) Polly ( Parrot) 18:11, 15 March 2008 (UTC) reply
unknown politician. Doesn't warrant an article. Countyroadswhisper ( talk) 17:55, 15 March 2008 (UTC) reply