This user may have left Wikipedia. Lifebaka has not edited Wikipedia since January 2015. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

Please add new comments in new sections. I will respond to messages here unless you ask otherwise. Or, if you're notifying me of a problem, I'll probably just fix it and leave it at that. I can also be contacted by email.

Dear sir/madam Lifebaka,

we want to make another attempt at contributing to the previously deleted record:

IProd - Integrated management of product heterogeneous data

Previously, you'd detected a copyright infringement (you were absolutey right). We have now made an original piece of text describing this project. We feel iProd deserves a page, as it is closely related to the future of Knowledge Based Engineering and provides more background material to the its appearance in Framework Programmes for Research and Technological Development.

Do we have your approval for giving it another shot?

Best regards,

Reinier

Details:

14:50, 22 September 2011 Lifebaka (talk | contribs) deleted page IProd - Integrated management of product heterogeneous data (G12: Unambiguous copyright infringement of http://www.iprod-project.eu/) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Reiniervandijk ( talk • contribs)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jackalwere is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jackalwere until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TTN ( talk) 21:28, 6 July 2017 (UTC) reply

I've been using your closedrv.js script. Thanks for making that available. I've noticed that turning on the beta syntax highlighting breaks your script; the text in the edit box doesn't get updated correctly. -- RoySmith (talk) 18:19, 16 September 2017 (UTC) reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Aerial servant is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aerial servant until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Not a very active user ( talk) 09:25, 19 September 2019 (UTC) reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rot grub is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rot grub until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Rorshacma ( talk) 16:01, 4 October 2019 (UTC) reply

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Simple englihs. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 December 10#Simple englihs until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The Tips of Apmh 16:45, 10 December 2021 (UTC) reply

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Goth Family and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 25#Goth Family until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Pizzaplayer219 ^Talk _Contribs 13:21, 25 October 2022 (UTC) reply

Template:NewdelrevCFD has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 ( talk) 00:03, 7 November 2023 (UTC) reply