From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from User talk:Starixxgamerrix)

This is my talk page! Please feel free to ask me a question! :]

WikiProject icon Video games NA‑class
WikiProject iconThis page is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
NAThis page does not require a rating on the project's quality scale.
Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:
WikiProject icon Deaf NA‑class
WikiProject iconThis page is part of WikiProject Deaf, the WikiProject which seeks to improve articles relating to all aspects of deaf-related and Deaf culture. For the Project guidelines, see the project page or talk page.
NAThis page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

.


Trouted

Whack!

You've been whacked with a wet trout.

Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly.

You have been trouted for: YOUR REASON HERE reverting someone else's edit

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hot 101.9 (April 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Nearlyevil665 were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
nearlyevil 665 17:30, 4 April 2024 (UTC) reply
Teahouse logo
Hello, Starixxgamerrix! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! nearlyevil 665 17:30, 4 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hot 101.9 (April 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Theroadislong ( talk) 14:19, 5 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Confusing warning

While I agree with the theme this warning in the general way that this IP is disruptive, I'm confused by the specific warning itself. It implies you had undone one of their edits, but I don't see that in your edit-history. And the editor was already blocked, so it seems contradictory to issue a "good faith" warning long after that editor demonstrated bad faith. DMacks ( talk) 18:17, 6 April 2024 (UTC) reply

That was my fault, I tried to go back but my computer would not let me go back, so by accident, it issued the warning which I did not want it to. I realized we both issued a different warning, mine was a test edits warning, yours was different. That was a mistake, ignore that warning I sent out. Starixxgamerrix ( talk) 18:23, 6 April 2024 (UTC) reply
Yes, I did not mean to issue a good faith one, I meant to issue a bad faith one that the editor was being disruptive, I'm new to using Twinkle, that's why, because I haven't used Twinkle before, so that warning was a bit confusing, I was trying to find the right warning for disruptive edits but I chose the wrong one. Now I know not to do that mistake again. Thanks for informing me! Starixxgamerrix ( talk) 18:28, 6 April 2024 (UTC) reply
No harm done. Twinkle definitely takes some practice sometimes. DMacks ( talk) 20:01, 6 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hot 101.9 (April 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Stuartyeates was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Stuartyeates ( talk) 21:22, 6 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Warning

Hello, Starixxgamerrix,

Do not create orphaned talk pages. They will just be deleted according to the guidelines for CSD, speedy deletion. Only create a talk page where there is a main page like an article, redirect or User page. If you have questions, please bring them to the Teahouse.

I also noticed that your draft on ths article subject has been declined by AFC. Therefore, it's not appropriate to move it to main space or it could be tagged for speedy deletion. Try to improve the draft using the advice from the AFC reviewer. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 05:11, 8 April 2024 (UTC) reply

I understand completely. Starixxgamerrix ( talk) 12:46, 8 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hot 101.9 (April 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Stuartyeates was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Stuartyeates ( talk) 10:38, 8 April 2024 (UTC) reply

A cookie for you!

Thanks for signing my guestbook! Myrealnamm ( 💬talk · ✏️contribs) at 15:26, 8 April 2024 (UTC) reply

AfC notification: Draft:Hot 101.9 has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Hot 101.9. Thanks! GoingBatty ( talk) 17:23, 8 April 2024 (UTC) reply

AfC notification: Draft:Hot 101.9 has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Hot 101.9. Thanks! GoingBatty ( talk) 17:25, 8 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Disambiguation link notification for April 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Manvita Kamath, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page St. Aloysius College. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:10, 10 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Added your gb on a LIST

Hello... Signed and added your guestbook here on your behalf. Have a nice time! Volten001 10:48, 20 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Your user page

First of all, thanks for signing my guestbook, I appreciate it.

I'm here to talk about the "snow" effect on your user page. While on desktop it unintrusively flows through the margins, and mobile, it's a different story. The snow makes it really hard to read your user page on mobile. I know how much you may like it, but please consider removing it to make your user page readable on mobile and not cause mobile editors to try and strain their eyes to read your user page. Just a request. If you reply here, please ping me. Thanks --- thetechie@enwiki: ~/talk/ $ 15:04, 23 April 2024 (UTC) reply

@ TheTechie yea I got a few comments on my user page which said that it was not viewable on mobile, since mobile is different than PC, I will fix it. Neko Lexi ( talk) 13:57, 24 April 2024 (UTC) reply
fixed, I hope you can see it better Neko Lexi ( talk) 14:03, 24 April 2024 (UTC) reply
 Thanks thetechie@enwiki: ~/talk/ $ 14:17, 24 April 2024 (UTC) reply
np. Neko Lexi ( talk) 14:18, 24 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Hi, sorry, why did you revert my edit? I was undoing possible vandalism, not the other way around. — W.andrea ( talk) 15:57, 29 April 2024 (UTC) reply

oops, wrong editor, I am so sorry, I thought it was vandalism Neko Lexi ( talk) 15:58, 29 April 2024 (UTC) reply
no worries :) — W.andrea ( talk) 15:59, 29 April 2024 (UTC) reply

April 2024

Information icon Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contribution(s). However, as a general rule, while user talk pages permit a small degree of generalisation, other talk pages such as Northern cardinal are strictly for discussing improvements to their associated main pages, and many of them have special instructions on the top. They are not a general discussion forum about the article's topic or any other topic. If you have questions or ideas and are not sure where to post them, consider asking at the Teahouse. Thanks. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 ( talk) 22:06, 29 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Also, is User:Quirkykiana an alternative account? If so, please note the instructions at WP:ALTACCN. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 ( talk) 22:07, 29 April 2024 (UTC) reply
yes that is my alt Neko Lexi ( talk) 22:48, 29 April 2024 (UTC) reply
Yes User:Quirkykiana is my alt account. And I have never done Vandalism or anything wrong on that account or my main account which is Neko Lexi. And I would never commit sockpuppetry, If I was ever accused of Sockpuppetry, and ever got banned one day. I would have nothing else to do. Neko Lexi ( talk) 23:06, 29 April 2024 (UTC) reply