This page is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles
This page is part of WikiProject Deaf, the WikiProject which seeks to improve articles relating to all aspects of
deaf-related and
Deaf culture. For the Project guidelines, see the
project page or
talk page.DeafWikipedia:WikiProject DeafTemplate:WikiProject Deafdeaf articles
Your recent article submission to
Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Nearlyevil665 were:
This draft's references do not show that the subject
qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about
mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to
Draft:Hot 101.9 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and
may be deleted.
Hello, Starixxgamerrix!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
nearlyevil665 17:30, 4 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Your recent article submission to
Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject
qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about
mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to
Draft:Hot 101.9 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and
may be deleted.
While I agree with the theme
this warning in the general way that this IP is disruptive, I'm confused by the specific warning itself. It implies you had undone one of their edits, but I don't see that in your edit-history. And the editor was already blocked, so it seems contradictory to issue a "good faith" warning long after that editor demonstrated bad faith.
DMacks (
talk) 18:17, 6 April 2024 (UTC)reply
That was my fault, I tried to go back but my computer would not let me go back, so by accident, it issued the warning which I did not want it to. I realized we both issued a different warning, mine was a test edits warning, yours was different. That was a mistake, ignore that warning I sent out.
Starixxgamerrix (
talk) 18:23, 6 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Yes, I did not mean to issue a good faith one, I meant to issue a bad faith one that the editor was being disruptive, I'm new to using Twinkle, that's why, because I haven't used Twinkle before, so that warning was a bit confusing, I was trying to find the right warning for disruptive edits but I chose the wrong one. Now I know not to do that mistake again. Thanks for informing me!
Starixxgamerrix (
talk) 18:28, 6 April 2024 (UTC)reply
No harm done. Twinkle definitely takes some practice sometimes.
DMacks (
talk) 20:01, 6 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Your recent article submission to
Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Stuartyeates was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject
qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about
mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
The comment the reviewer left was:
Most of the references do not cover the subject depth. Most of the content in the article is not mentioned in the supplied refs.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to
Draft:Hot 101.9 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and
may be deleted.
Do not create orphaned talk pages. They will just be deleted according to the guidelines for CSD, speedy deletion. Only create a talk page where there is a main page like an article, redirect or User page. If you have questions, please bring them to
the Teahouse.
I also noticed that your draft on ths article subject has been declined by AFC. Therefore, it's not appropriate to move it to main space or it could be tagged for speedy deletion. Try to improve the draft using the advice from the AFC reviewer. Thank you. LizRead!Talk! 05:11, 8 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Your recent article submission to
Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Stuartyeates was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject
qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about
mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
The comment the reviewer left was:
We need independent sources that cover the subject in depth.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to
Draft:Hot 101.9 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and
may be deleted.
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at
Draft:Hot 101.9. Thanks!
GoingBatty (
talk) 17:23, 8 April 2024 (UTC)reply
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at
Draft:Hot 101.9. Thanks!
GoingBatty (
talk) 17:25, 8 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Disambiguation link notification for April 10
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited
Manvita Kamath, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page
St. Aloysius College. Such links are
usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the
FAQ • Join us at the
DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these
opt-out instructions. Thanks, --
DPL bot (
talk) 06:10, 10 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Added your gb on a LIST
Hello... Signed and added your guestbook
here on your behalf. Have a nice time!
Volten001☎ 10:48, 20 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Your user page
First of all, thanks for signing my guestbook, I appreciate it.
I'm here to talk about the "snow" effect on your user page. While on desktop it unintrusively flows through the margins, and mobile, it's a different story. The snow makes it really hard to read your user page on mobile. I know how much you may like it, but please consider removing it to make your user page readable on mobile and not cause mobile editors to try and strain their eyes to read your user page. Just a request. If you reply here, please ping me. Thanks --- thetechie@enwiki:
~/talk/$ 15:04, 23 April 2024 (UTC)reply
@
TheTechie yea I got a few comments on my user page which said that it was not viewable on mobile, since mobile is different than PC, I will fix it.
Neko Lexi (
talk) 13:57, 24 April 2024 (UTC)reply
fixed, I hope you can see it better
Neko Lexi (
talk) 14:03, 24 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for
your contribution(s). However, as a
general rule, while user talk pages permit a small degree of generalisation, other talk pages such as
Northern cardinal are strictly for discussing improvements to their associated main pages, and many of them have special instructions on the top. They are
not a general discussion forum about the article's topic or any other topic. If you have questions or ideas and are not sure where to post them, consider asking at the
Teahouse. Thanks.
~~ AirshipJungleman29 (
talk) 22:06, 29 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Yes
User:Quirkykiana is my alt account. And I have never done Vandalism or anything wrong on that account or my main account which is Neko Lexi. And I would never commit sockpuppetry, If I was ever accused of Sockpuppetry, and ever got banned one day. I would have nothing else to do.
Neko Lexi (
talk) 23:06, 29 April 2024 (UTC)reply