- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Waggers TALK 10:39, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
Police Trainer
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Police Trainer ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Lack of notability, was unable to find any reliable sources showing notability. Was already dePRODded in 2010. Waxworker ( talk) 23:48, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Waxworker ( talk) 23:48, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 22:44, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- Keep - Being the subject of arcade games, the game really has a popularity. It fulfills the notability. Being an old article, may have been based on a reference for so long, its mention is spot on in search and other places. I have improved the article.
Ontor22 (
talk) 17:53, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
- @ Ontor22: - I've removed the sources you added - Hard Drive is a satire website similar to The Onion, and the article was a joke. GameFAQs is an unreliable WP:USERGENERATED source and unreliable per WP:VG/RS. The reliability of the Arcade Club database is unclear to me, but it isn't substantial coverage regardless. Waxworker ( talk) 19:17, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Be mindful of WP:ITSPOPULAR, understand what you mean but notability-type arguments not based on policy around WP:GNG can have issues. ＶＲＸＣＥＳ ( talk) 21:06, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
- The sources you added are not reliable, sorry. It was a good move to revert that. Contributor892z ( talk) 06:43, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- Delete - Fails WP:GNG. Short articles in EGM2 and Retro Gamer: [1], [2], not significant coverage. -- Mika1h ( talk) 14:55, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Lacks significant coverage by independent reliable sources. Contributor892z ( talk) 06:41, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.