Delete: Could find no sources to establish notability.
Esw01407 (
talk) 16:35, 26 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete. As always, the notability test for actors and actresses is not automatically passed just by listing roles, and requires the provision of
WP:GNG-worthy
reliable source coverage about her and her roles, but none is present here and I've had about as much luck as the above commenters at finding anything better.
Bearcat (
talk) 17:59, 26 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Keep The subject specific guideline for voice actors has been met.
WP:NACTOR states: The person has had significant roles in multiple notable films, television shows, stage performances, or other productions.
https://www.imdb.com/name/nm3045630/ She played one of the three Power Puff girls in all 52 episodes of
Powerpuff Girls Z. She played Nya in
Ninjago: Masters of Spinjitzu for 100 episodes.
Wikipedia:Notability clearly states "It meets either the general notability guideline (GNG) below, or the criteria outlined in a subject-specific notability guideline (SNG)". You don't have to do both. Also those linking to
WP:THREE, kindly ready the personal essay you are linking to, it states don't list more than three sources in an AFD or no one will bother looking them over.
DreamFocus 12:14, 2 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Keep: Subject played a significant role in all episodes of one notable work (PPGZ), voiced a primary character in the English version of all episodes of
Tara Duncan (TV series), and played one character over 200 times in various iterations of
Ninjago. By my reading, this is a clear pass of NACTOR, even for a voice or translation actor.
User:Dream Focus and I often disagree, but we agree here
WP:THREE is an essay with no relevance to this discussion, and the subject meets the SNG with lots of significant (even repeating) roles in their field. It's a BLP, so I'd like reliable sources about the person, but WP:ENT is met, IMHO.
BusterD (
talk) 22:54, 2 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Relisting as there is disagreement over
WP:NACTOR is met. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, LizRead!Talk! 04:52, 3 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete She's had several significant roles but there is no coverage. Bold in following quotes is added for emphasisWP:Notability (people) (which includes
WP:NACTOR) states: People are likely to be notable if they meet any of the following standards. Failure to meet these criteria is not conclusive proof that a subject should not be included; conversely, meeting one or more does not guarantee that a subject should be included.WP:Notability states : Therefore, topics which pass an SNG are presumed to merit an article, though articles which pass an SNG or the GNG may still be deleted or merged into another article, especially if adequate sourcing or significant coverage cannot be found, or if the topic is not suitable for an encyclopedia Even
WP:NACTOR only says may be considered notable.
Schazjmd(talk) 14:11, 5 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Comment. I agree that this article may be deleted, since "adequate sourcing or significant coverage cannot be found". I added cite needed tags to request
WP:RSs, but another editor deleted them, adding more
WP:OR instead. If
WP:OR is added again, such as the unreferenced assertion that she voiced x number of episodes,
User:Schazjmd, it will convince me that the article ought to be deleted. --
Ssilvers (
talk) 03:08, 6 May 2024 (UTC)reply