Thank you for the support vote in my recent RfA. Although it wasn't successful I appreciate your vote of confidence. Cla68 22:43, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
| Thank you for your support on my
Request for adminship, which finished successfully, with unanimous support of 40/0/0.
I will do my best to serve Wikipedia and the community. Again thanks. | |
|---|---|
| -- Meno25 08:12, 7 April 2007 (UTC) |
RfA thanks from Akhilleus
 |
Mike_7, thanks for your support in my successful
RfA. As the picture shows, the goddesses have already bestowed my new weapons, |
|
Thank you for supporting me on my recent nomination for adminship, which passed with a tally of 45/0/0. Please let me know if I can help with something or if I make a mistake. Cheers! -- KFP ( talk | contribs) 14:59, 10 April 2007 (UTC) |
Thanks a lot for your support in my RfA. It was successful. J Milburn 16:09, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for your support of my RFA. Please give me a shout if you need anything.-- Fuhghettaboutit 13:21, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
The April 2007 issue of the WikiProject Biography newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you BetacommandBot 19:32, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
WikiProject Biography is holding a three month long assessment drive!
The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unassessed articles. The drive is running from June 1, 2007 – September 1, 2007.
Awards to be won range from delicacies such as the
WikiCookie to the great
Golden Wiki Award.
There are over 110,000 articles to assess so please visit the
drive's page and help out!
This drive was conceived of and organized by Psychless with the help of Ozgod. Regards, Psychless Type words!.
Just wanted to let you know that I opened an RfC on myself in response to the concerns raised during my RfA over my actions in the Gary Weiss dispute. The RfC is located here and I welcome any comments or questions you may have. CLA 09:32, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for participating in either of my unsuccessful requests for adminship. Although the experience was frustrating, it showed me some mistakes I was making, and I hope to learn from those mistakes.
Please take a few minutes to read User:YechielMan/Other stuff/RFA review and advise me how to proceed. Best regards. Yechiel Man 22:07, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
A new elimination drive of the backlog at Wikipedia:Good article candidates will take place from the month of July through August 12, 2007. There are currently about 130 articles that need to be reviewed right now. If you are interested in helping with the drive, then please visit Wikipedia:Good article candidates backlog elimination drive and record the articles that you have reviewed. Awards will be given based on the number of reviews completed. Since the potential amount of reviewers may significantly increase, please make sure to add :{{ GAReview}} underneath the article you are reviewing to ensure that only one person is reviewing each article. Additionally, the GA criteria may have been modified since your last review, so look over the criteria again to help you to determine if a candidate is GA-worthy. If you have any questions about this drive or the review process, leave a message on the drive's talk page. Please help to eradicate the backlog to cut down on the waiting time for articles to be reviewed.
You have received this message either due to your membership with WikiProject: Good Articles and/or your inclusion on the Wikipedia:Good article candidates/List of reviewers. -- Nehrams2020 23:34, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
Notability of Sconex
Hello, this is a message from
an automated bot. A tag has been placed on
Sconex, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be
speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because
Sconex seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the
criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please
see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting
Sconex, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at
WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the
bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself.
CSDWarnBot 21:26, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
|
|
Wishing Mike 7 a very happy adminship anniversary on behalf of the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Lizzie Harrison 17:24, 17 September 2007 (UTC) |
 Volume IV, no. 4 - September 2007 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Congratulations to our 225 new members |
The newsletter is back! Many things have gone on during the past few months, but many things have not. While the assessment drive helped revitalize the assessment department of the project, many other departments have received no attention. Most notably: peer review and our "workgroups". A day long IRC meeting has been planned for October 13th, with the major focus being which areas of the project are "dead", what should our goals be as a project, and how to "revive" the dead areas of our project. Contribute to the discussion on the the new channel (see below) We decided to deliver this newsletter to all project members this month but only those with their names down here will get it delivered in the future. This is your newsletter and you can be involved in the creation of the next issue. Any and all contributions are welcome. Simply let yourself be known to any of the undersigned or post news on the next issue's talk page
Lastly, a new WikiProject Biography channel has been set up on the freenode network: Our thanks to Phoenix 15 for setting it up.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Complete To Do List
Suzanne Carrell • Mullá Husayn • John Gilchrist (linguist) • Thomas Brattle •
Assessment Progress
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
To receive this newsletter in the future, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. This newsletter was delivered by the automated R Delivery Bot 15:48, 7 October 2007 (UTC) .
WikiProject Good Articles Newsletter for November 2007
The November 2007 issue of the WikiProject Good Articles newsletter has been published. Comments are welcome on this, as well as suggestions or offers of assistance for the December 2007 issue. Dr. Cash 01:16, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
WikiProject Good Articles Newsletter for December 2007
The December 2007 issue of the WikiProject Good Articles newsletter has been published. Comments are welcome on this, as well as suggestions or offers of assistance for the January 2008 issue. Dr. Cash 01:06, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for your support in my successful RFA. AliveFreeHappy ( talk) 07:33, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
It was really a school built decades ago! —Preceding unsigned comment added by RacerzGTR ( talk • contribs) 10:02, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
Happy New Year! Here is the latest edition of the WikiProject GA Newsletter! Dr. Cash ( talk) 04:03, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
| The Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles Newsletter | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||
// F 9 T 19:45, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
|
Hello, Mike 7! Your username, as well as the usernames of other members of Wikipedia: WikiProject Lemony Snicket, has been moved to the inactive members list, as part of a process for making the wikiproject active once again. If you would like to continue to be an active member, please follow the instructions on the top of the participants page to add your name to the active participants list. |
The February 2008 issue of the WikiProject Good Articles Newsletter is ready! Dr. Cash ( talk) 05:23, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
| The Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles Newsletter | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||
The March 2008 issue of the WikiProject Good Articles Newsletter is ready! Dr. Cash ( talk) 06:05, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
| The Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles Newsletter | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||
|
Happy First Edit Day, Mike 7, from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day! |
wwe socks sign 05:57, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
No problem! wwe socks sign 06:18, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
|
Happy First Edit Day, Mike 7, from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day! User:Idontknow610 ( talk) 05:47, 25 October 2017 (UTC) |
Idontknow 610 TM 19:14, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
The April issue of the WikiProject Good Articles Newsletter is now available. Dr. Cash ( talk) 03:58, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
| The Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles Newsletter | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||
WikiProject Good Articles May Newsletter
The May Newsletter for WikiProject Good Articles has now been published. Dr. Cash ( talk) 22:16, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
| The Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles Newsletter | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||
| The Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles Newsletter | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||
Delivered by the automated Giggabot ( stop!) 01:55, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
WikiProject New Jersey advisory
Help Wanted! Articles are languishing, categories are stagnating, assessments are missing, the portal is static, and you can help.
You are cordially invited to visit the redesigned WikiProject New Jersey and invite others to do the same.
You are receiving this message as a member of WikiProject New Jersey. You can remove yourself from the mailing list here.
- Notice delivery by xenobot 01:15, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
Sorry about the delay. AWB has been having a few issues lately. Here is the august issue of the WikiProject Good Articles Newsletter! Dr. Cash ( talk) 20:41, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
| The The WikiProject Good articles Newsletter | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||
WikiProject New Jersey Newsletter (August 2008)
 The WikiProject New Jersey Newsletter | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
| Project News | Article Alerts | ||
| The Reboot of
Wikiproject New Jersey has certainly stirred up some new activity at the project. Discussion on several improvements and new initiatives have been going on at the
talk page. There has been an involved
discussion regarding our 88
unassessed articles, especially those on municipalities. The current goal is to review and assess all 566 New Jersey muncipality articles by September 30. A suggestion has been made to intiate Wikipedia Takes New Jersey to begin clearing the large backlog of articles needing photos. Let's all grab our cameras and head out into the vast wilds of the Garden State. Town Halls, High Schools, Historic Places - every article deserves a picture. |
The following articles may be in need of attention:
Featured Article candidates:
Good Article nominees: | ||
| New Jersey Collaboration news | New WPNJ members | ||
| WPNJ member
Mm40 has volunteered to coordinate a new WPNJ Collaboration project. It's been a while since we used the
NJCOTW and new volunteers are needed. Join the
discussion to volunteer.
Battle of Trenton was recently proposed as a Featured Article candidate. It was not promoted, but has now been nominated for A-Class review through the Military History WikiProject. Take a look at their A-Class FAQ. As we need to set up our own process for reviewing A-Class articles, it may be worth watching the process. |
Please welcome the following new members to WikiProject New Jersey:
| ||
| Reboot progress report | Help Wanted | ||
| The redesign has been well received. There are still some things left to do. This newsletter was one big check mark off the list. Hopefully this can be continued on a regular basis. There are literally thousands of articles in
Category:New Jersey that have not been tagged as part of the project, and stub sorting hasn't been run in 10 months. We will need to identify some friendly bot operators to help with these projects. An outreach department (which includes the newsletter) needs to be formalized. Creating an invitation template for easy placement on userpages will also be part of that effort.
There are lots of best practices described at the WikiProject Council with ideas of how to make our project more responsive, welcoming, active, and effective. Task forces? Peer review? Other ideas welcome! |
| ||
| Editor's Notes | |||
| I just wanted to say that the response to my bold makeover of WPNJ has been gratifying, but nothing will improve the project as much as more activity, and that means more members. There are lots of things to do in this new setup, and everyone with an interest should be able to find a way to contribute to the collaboration. I want to thank you all for the patience, the appreciation, and the effort. - Jim Miller | |||
| You are receiving this newsletter as a member of WikiProject New Jersey. To stop receiving these messages, remove your name here. | |||
- Newsletter delivery by xenobot 18:48, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
| Happy Adminship | from the Birthday Committee | |
|---|---|---|
 Wishing Mike 7 a very happy adminship anniversary on behalf of the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! | ||
WikiProject New Jersey Newsletter (September 2008)
|
The WikiProject New Jersey Newsletter | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
| Project News | Article Alerts | ||
| The
Maryland WikiProject has put together a great chart comparing the growth of several state WikiProjects, including WPNJ. Take a look at
the chart to see how the growth of WPNJ compares to some of our peer projects. Please remember to place the {{
WikiProject New Jersey}} tag on the talk pages of any New Jersey related articles you create or come across. You can also add the
new articles page to your watchlist. Some updates have been made to the NJ Portal, but much more needs to be done. If a few volunteers can put together Featured Article summmaries, we can automate rotating the portal content. The same can be done for DYK items. Please take a look and see if you can assist. |
The following articles may be in need of attention:
Featured Article candidates:
Good Article nominees:
| ||
| Wikipedia Release version 0.7 | New WPNJ members | ||
| The
Wikipedia 0.7 project team has chosen the New Jersey related articles that will be included in the next downloadable version of Wikipedia. You can
review the list of selected WPNJ articles, check the
articles tagged for cleanup, or
nominate additional articles for inclusion.
Selection is an automated process based on article assessments. To help avoid vandalism and POV concerns, specific versions of articles can be tagged for inclusion in the downloadable release. See the New Jersey section of the bot results to recommend a production version. The process ends on October 20, and then a bot will select an appropriate version if none has been recommended. |
Please welcome the following new members to WikiProject New Jersey:
| ||
| Article News | Help Wanted | ||
| Both
Jon Corzine and
The Sopranos were promoted to
Good Article status in the past month. No WikiProject New Jersey articles were promoted to
Featured article status.
Battle of Trenton was not listed as a Featured Article, and may need more editors to complete the remaining work to be promoted. Also, in an item that was missed last month,
Thomas Edison was delisted as a Good Article in July.
The WPNJ Assessment Drive is ongoing. Please help assess all of the articles about places in New Jersey. There are currently 88 articles that have not been assessed. |
|||
| Editor's Notes | |||
| Fall has arrived, and with it will come a rush of new Wikipedians. Inviting new editors to join WPNJ is easy to do, and can help us improve our New Jersey articles. Keep an eye out for editors who work on NJ articles who can help the project. The Wikipedia Release version project is in its final stages for the next version. Take a look at the article lists, cleanup where you can, and nominate articles that should be included on the DVD version of WP. Lets make sure that those who end up with a downloaded copy of WP get solid articles about New Jersey. - Jim Miller | |||
| You are receiving this newsletter as a member of WikiProject New Jersey. To stop receiving these messages, remove your name here. | |||
- Newsletter delivery by xenobot 16:29, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
WikiProject New Jersey Newsletter (October 2008)
|
The WikiProject New Jersey Newsletter | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
| Project News | Article Alerts | ||
| A new bot is patrolling Wikipedia workflows to let WPNJ members know when any of our articles may be in need of attention. Any article tagged with the WPNJ banner that has been added to one of the major workflows (AfD, FAC, GAN, etc.) will be added to a new project page. The bot runs daily, so add the new Article Alerts page to your watchlist, or just check the main project page to see the updates. See the Article Alerts project page for details on how the bot works and which processes it covers. | The following articles may be in need of attention:
Featured Article/List candidates: Good Article nominees:
| ||
| Cross-Project Collaboration Request | New WPNJ members | ||
| WPNJ received the following request for assistance with
New Jersey Devils articles: "The WikiProject Ice Hockey is currently looking for editors to help update team articles about the 2008-09 NHL season. If you are interested in the NHL, please consider helping us keep these article current. To sign up, go to this page and add your name beside the team or teams you wish to particpate in." See the WPNJ talk page for more information. |
Please welcome the following new members to WikiProject New Jersey:
| ||
| New Jersey on the Main Page | Help Wanted | ||
| No, not the state - the battleship! On October 15, USS New Jersey (BB-62) was the Featured Article on the Wikipedia main page. Featured articles receive heavier traffic when they are on the main page. Improving WPNJ articles to featured status can help drive more editors to our project. |
| ||
| Editor's Notes | |||
| Seems like a pretty light month in terms of activity at WPNJ. Personally, your editor was doing a lot of travelling and went on a wiki-free vacation for nine days. Time to dive back in and create some new NJ articles. - Jim Miller See me | Touch me | |||
| You are receiving this newsletter as a member of WikiProject New Jersey. To stop receiving these messages, remove your name here. | |||
- Newsletter delivery by xenobot 13:29, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
Mike881270 (
talk) has given you a
cookie! Cookies promote
WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy munching!
Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{ subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{ subst:munch}}!
Mike881270 ( talk) 20:08, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
Hello, I hope you are doing well. I am sending you this message since you are a member of the GA WikiProject. I would like to invite you to consider helping with the GA sweeps process. Sweeps helps to ensure that the oldest GAs still meet the criteria, and improve the quality of GAs overall. Unfortunately, last month only two articles were reviewed. This is definitely a low point after our peak at the beginning of the process when 163 articles were reviewed in September 2007. After nearly two years, the running total has just passed the 50% mark. In order to expediate the reviewing, several changes have been made to the process. A new worklist has been created, detailing which articles are left to review. All exempt and previously reviewed articles have already been removed from the list. Instead of reviewing by topic, you can consider picking and choosing whichever articles interest you.
We are always looking for new members to assist with the remaining articles, so if you are interested or know of anybody that can assist, please visit the GA sweeps page. In addition, for every member that reviews 100 articles or has a significant impact on the process, s/he will get an award when they reach that threshold. If only 14 editors achieve this feat starting now, we would be done with Sweeps! Of course, having more people reviewing less articles would be better for all involved, so please consider asking others to help out. Feel free to stop by and only review a few articles, something's better than nothing! Take a look at the list, and see what articles interest you. Let's work to complete Sweeps so that efforts can be fully focused on the backlog at GAN. If you have any questions about the process, reviewing, or need help with a particular article, please contact me or OhanaUnited and we'll be happy to help. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 ( talk • contrib) 08:30, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
|
|
Hello, Mike 7 and thank you for your contributions on articles related to the works of
Lemony Snicket. I'd like to invite you to become a
member of the
Lemony Snicket task force, a task force aiming to improve coverage of
Lemony Snicket and related articles on Wikipedia.
If you would like to help out and participate, please visit the task force page for more information. Thanks! — The Man in Question (gesprec) · (forðung) 06:40, 12 May 2009 (UTC) |
Pls note that there is a category deletion discussion re Italian Americans afoot at [1]-- Epeefleche ( talk) 16:30, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Chris Sligh and others
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated articles are Chris Sligh, Gina Glocksen, Haley Scarnato, Melissa McGhee, Kevin Covais, Lisa Tucker (singer), Anwar Robinson. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also " What Wikipedia is not").
Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to the relevant discussion pages: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Sligh (4th nomination) for Chris Sligh, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gina Glocksen (2nd nomination) for Gina Glocksen, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Haley Scarnato (2nd nomination) for Haley Scarnato, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Melissa McGhee (2nd nomination) for Melissa McGhee, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kevin Covais for Kevin Covais, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lisa Tucker (singer) for Lisa Tucker (singer), Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anwar Robinson for Anwar Robinson. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).
You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.
Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. -- Erwin85Bot ( talk) 01:43, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
I'm working on compiling a book containing information about almost all Non-indigenous ethnic groups living or working in Pakistan. The population of a particular ethnic group would be obtain respectively from their diplomatic missions in Pakistan including regions with significant populations, languages spoken and religious affiliations. I'm not very good with writing so it would be great, if you would like to collaborate with me.-- 116.71.53.25 ( talk) 06:04, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
I have contacted numerous admins and not one of them have replied hopefully you will, A article i wrote that ties in with The Shak List Of The Shak Episodes has a deletion box above it, I fixed the problem with the article and three weeks on I'm still waiting on a reply. Yours Sincerly User:Matt-tastic
WikiProject New Jersey Newsletter (November 2009)
|
The WikiProject New Jersey Newsletter | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
| Project News | Article Alerts | ||
| Education Task Force - The conversion of the former WikiProject Education is New Jersey has been completed. New Jersey education-related articles are now supported by the
Education task force. The
project banner has been updated to fully support the task force with independent importance ratings. No More Comments - A proposal at the Village Pump has resulted in the deprecation of comments subpages. These were usually found at Talk:Article title/Comments and contained little more than assessment notes. These pages were not widely watched, and are often a hidden location for vandalism and BLP violations. WPNJ has 104 articles that used these pages. A complete list of them, along with their contents, can be viewed at Wikipedia:WikiProject New Jersey/Deprecation of comments. It is up to the members of WPNJ to decide what to do with this information. |
The following articles may be in need of attention:
Featured Article candidates:
Good Article nominees: | ||
| Municipality template compromise; School Districts (almost) complete | New WPNJ members | ||
| Legislative templates in municipal articles - A rather lengthy
discussion ran from the end of August until the end of October regarding the use of our legislative district templates in articles about local municipalities. Many WPNJ members commented on the concept, and a
proposed compromise seems to have been reached. The templates will require some adjustments to fit the new wording, but should result in more directly relevant sections about County, State, and Federal representation in our articles on cities, towns, villages, townships, and boroughs. Hopefully, more dicussions like this can result is some kind of Manual of Style to bring greater standardization to all of these articles. School District articles now comprehensive - WPNJ Founder Alansohn recently reported that almost all of New Jersey's school districts now have articles - "I have created the article for the last missing (non-vocational) school district in the state." Congrats to Alansohn, who I am sure would love more members at the Education task force to help maintain these articles! |
Please welcome the following new members to WikiProject New Jersey:
| ||
| Watch These Pages | Help Wanted | ||
| Want to do more to help WikiProject New Jersey? Here are some suggested pages to add to your watchlist: |
| ||
| Editor's Notes | |||
| Editor's news. OK, so I am going to try this again. It's been a little over a year since our last edition, and activity at the project was a bit slow during that time. Things have picked up again over the last few months, so once more into the breech I go. I will try to produce this newsletter on a regular basis (bi-monthly?) to see if we can get some more activity going at WPNJ. Help is always appreciated, and there is plenty to do. - Jim Miller See me | Touch me | |||
| You are receiving this newsletter as a member of WikiProject New Jersey. To stop receiving these messages, remove your name here. | |||
- Newsletter delivery by xenobot 14:09, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
WikiProject New Jersey Newsletter (January 2010)
|
The WikiProject New Jersey Newsletter | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
| Project News | Article Alerts | ||
| New Statistics Table There has been an upgrade to the
WP 1.0 bot that updates our project's
summary table. The new table lists all page classes including Portal-class, Redirect-class, and Disambig-class. We now have a better picture of the scope of the WikiProject and the pages that we cover. New York Times to charge for access The New York Times is an invaluable resource for properly referencing articles, but especially due to its extensive archives and coverage of New Jersey issues. The announcement that metered content will be started in 2011 has the potential to make article sourcing much more difficult. It also causes a need to update linked sources in articles before all of the NYT links go dead. Any link can be archived on demand by using WebCite. We can help avoid dead links by archiving any article sources from the NYT. |
The following articles may be in need of attention:
Featured Article/List candidates: Good Article nominees: | ||
| All BLP, All the Time | New WPNJ members | ||
| BLP Issue Boils Over There are discussions all over the 'pedia about deleting close to 50,000 unreferenced Biographies of Living People. We won't get into a rehash here, but let's just look at what we can do. There is a new item on the
project task list for sourcing BLPs. All articles that are in both
Category:People from New Jersey and
Category:All unreferenced BLPs are now available on
this work list. These articles need to be sourced,
PRODded, or sent to
AfD. An ounce of prevention Unreferenced BLPs are one of the catgories regularly listed in the WPNJ Cleanup listing. New articles are also a prime location to find articles that do not yet have references. You can keep an eye on the New Articles list to help prevent the workload from getting any larger. Can we do more? There are bots that will automatically add the WPNJ Project Banner to all articles in our designated categories if we have consensus to request it. Join the discussion here. |
Please welcome the following new members to WikiProject New Jersey:
| ||
| In NJ, politics means article updates | Help Wanted | ||
| New Leaders in NJ Government Over the past 2 weeks, new legislators have been sworn in, the legislature has new leadership, the 55th
Governor of New Jersey has been inaugurated, and we have our first
Lt. Governor. All new members of the Legislature have at least stub articles, and many of the templates have been updated. Updating templates Many New Jersey articles utilize stadardized templates to convey information. With elections happening as often as they do in this state, January is always a good time to review these templates and update them with new information. Does your town or county have new elected officials? It's maintainance time on many of our articles on municipalities and counties as well. |
| ||
| Editor's Notes | |||
| Editor's news Must have been some winter holiday season in New Jersey, because the project talk page has been unusually quiet. I thought with all that snow, many of us would be inside and doing things here at WP. I hope you all had a wonderful holiday season and are enjoying a healthy and happy 2010!! - Jim Miller See me | Touch me | |||
| You are receiving this newsletter as a member of WikiProject New Jersey. To stop receiving these messages, remove your name here. | |||
- Newsletter delivery by xenobot 13:49, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
Articles for deletion nomination of Jami Floyd
I have nominated Jami Floyd, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jami Floyd. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Sandstein 09:25, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
| WikiProject Good Articles will be running a GAN backlog elimination drive for the entire month of April. The goal of this drive is to bring the number of outstanding Good Article nominations down to below 200. This will help editors in restoring confidence to the GAN process as well as actively improving, polishing, and rewarding good content. If you are interested in participating in the drive, please place your name here. Awards will be given out to those who review certain numbers of GANs as well as to those who review the most. Hope we can see you in April. |  |
– MuZemike delivered by MuZebot 17:55, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
Dear Mike 7,
My name is Jonathan Obar user:Jaobar, I'm a professor in the College of Communication Arts and Sciences at Michigan State University and a Teaching Fellow with the Wikimedia Foundation's Education Program. This semester I've been running a little experiment at MSU, a class where we teach students about becoming Wikipedia administrators. Not a lot is known about your community, and our students (who are fascinated by wiki-culture by the way!) want to learn how you do what you do, and why you do it. A while back I proposed this idea (the class) to the community HERE, where it was met mainly with positive feedback. Anyhow, I'd like my students to speak with a few administrators to get a sense of admin experiences, training, motivations, likes, dislikes, etc. We were wondering if you'd be interested in speaking with one of our students.
So a few things about the interviews:
- Interviews will last between 15 and 30 minutes.
- Interviews can be conducted over skype (preferred), IRC or email. (You choose the form of communication based upon your comfort level, time, etc.)
- All interviews will be completely anonymous, meaning that you (real name and/or pseudonym) will never be identified in any of our materials, unless you give the interviewer permission to do so.
- All interviews will be completely voluntary. You are under no obligation to say yes to an interview, and can say no and stop or leave the interview at any time.
- The entire interview process is being overseen by MSU's institutional review board (ethics review). This means that all questions have been approved by the university and all students have been trained how to conduct interviews ethically and properly.
Bottom line is that we really need your help, and would really appreciate the opportunity to speak with you. If interested, please send me an email at obar@msu.edu (to maintain anonymity) and I will add your name to my offline contact list. If you feel comfortable doing so, you can post your name
HERE instead.
If you have questions or concerns at any time, feel free to email me at obar@msu.edu. I will be more than happy to speak with you.
Thanks in advance for your help. We have a lot to learn from you.
Sincerely,
Jonathan Obar -- Jaobar ( talk) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.11.206.39 ( talk) 03:21, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
|
Happy First Edit Day, Mike 7, from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day! Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talk about my edits? 00:26, 2 April 2012 (UTC) |
The article New Jersey District Key Club International has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- While the parent organization ( Key Club) is reasonably notable, this particular district of it (one of 30) completely fails the notability criteria for organizations. I have been unable to find any sigificant coverage of it in independent reliable sources
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Voceditenore (
talk) 12:47, 29 May 2012 (UTC)
|
at my successful RFA |
| Thank you, Mike 7, for !voting at my successful RFA; I am humbled that you put your trust in me. I grant you this flower, which, if tended to properly, will grow to be the fruit of Wikipedia's labours. — Crisco 1492 ( talk) 11:33, 3 June 2012 (UTC) |
Thanks for the speedy deletes. Van Isaac WS contribs 05:48, 16 June 2012 (UTC)
You recently speedily deleted the article Love Machine (dance troupe). While I realise its notability could be a matter of opinion, I do not believe it met the criteria for speedy deletion as it did include a significant claim to notability, in that they did have a significant, if brief, role in a very well-know British TV programme. PatGallacher ( talk) 23:51, 16 June 2012 (UTC)
- Thank you for your message. In reviewing the speedy deletion proposal and the article, the primary concern seems to be the lack of assertion of importance for the group. Do you believe you could possibly merge relevant information concerning this group into the article for The Benny Hill Show? I noticed there is no mention to Love Machine on that article, yet there is to the troupe that superseded Love Machine. Michael ( talk) 08:04, 17 June 2012 (UTC)
FYI - You speedy deleted SojoSolutions, which has now been recreated by another user. -- Biker Biker ( talk) 10:39, 17 June 2012 (UTC)
With regards to your block of 60.242.91.165 ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log), I am not sure what it was for - the personal attack in response for Castlemate ( talk · contribs)'s message? (A user is entitled to remove warnings from his talk page; see the user space guidelines.) If there's nothing else, then I'd say that a week's block is rather severe; a warning may have sufficed. - Mike Rosoft ( talk) 17:18, 17 June 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks, Mike. I looked over the user's contributions again and reduced the block to expire within 24 hours. The personal attack was indeed the reason for the block, and I cited vandalism due to edit summary vandalism, though citing personal attack as the reason would also have sufficed. Thank you again for your message. Michael ( talk) 22:52, 17 June 2012 (UTC)
Hi Mike 7
Yesterday I requested that a number of artciles in my workspace be deleted. It appears that User:Martinvl/sandbox was deleted in error. Is it possible to restore this page?
Regards Martinvl ( talk) 17:46, 17 June 2012 (UTC)
Hi Mike! I'm writing on behalf of a user contesting a speedy on Duotrope, User:Rick Norwood. He's requested that the article be re-added so he can work on it and find sources. I didn't really find anything when I searched, but I have no problem with a copy of the article being moved into Rick's userspace so he can work on it and look for sources. I didn't know if you could do this or if he had to go through the undeletion request board. Rick wanted it readded to the mainspace, but I think it might be better for it to be added to his userspace so it doesn't get tagged for a speedy, prodded, or put to an AfD before he's finished. Tokyogirl79 ( talk) 03:46, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
- I, and most of the writers I talk to, find Duotrope a valuable resource for writers. It is useful, stable, and has been around for a long time. I am not connected with Duotrope, except that I use it to find markets for the stories I write. It certainly seems noteworthy to me. It is mentioned in 44 other Wikipedia articles and gets 274,000 hits on Google. I'd appreciate a chance to do more work on the article. Rick Norwood ( talk) 12:49, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
- Thank you both for the messages. Rick, I moved the article to your user space at User:Rick Norwood/Duotrope so that you may continue working on it and locating sources. I also referred to the What links here page and was only able to find three pages (including our two talk pages) linking to Duotrope, so I'm not sure if you were looking at a different page, but it does not appear we have a large number of red links for the page. Links to Duotrope articles used as sources don't appear as red links on the pages on which they appear since they're typically not linked to our article space. Also, we can't determine something to be notable based on cross-referencing to other Wikipedia articles; we definitely need external sources. Best of luck as you continue to work on this article! Michael ( talk) 06:46, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Thanks, Mike 7. Rick Norwood ( talk) 12:28, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Mate, Why did you revert my user talk page? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.242.91.165 ( talk) 12:23, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Hi, Mike. One of your deletions is under discussion (such as it were) at ANI. Just letting you know. :) -- Moonriddengirl (talk) 12:29, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
 | This user page may require cleanup to meet Wikipedia's quality standards. No cleanup reason has been specified. Please help improve this user page if you can. |
 | |
| Company type | Public |
|---|---|
| Industry | Advertising Agency |
| Founded | 2003 |
| Headquarters | Chicago, USA |
Key people | Alan Osetek, President |
Number of employees | 350 (2012) |
| Website | http://www.resolutionmedia.com |
Resolution Media is a Digital Marketing Agency With an Established Foundation in Search Marketing
With a foundation and depth of experience in Pay-Per-Click Search advertising (PPC) and Search Engine Optimization (SEO), Resolution Media has grown to expand its services to include Web Conversion Optimization (WCO), Digital Behavior Analysis (DBA) and Mobile, Video and Social media.
While Resolution Media remains com...mitted to helping our clients meet and exceed their business goals through search engine marketing (SEM) strategies and integration, we are looking forward to the continued growth of the search industry and its expanding role in the broader digital spectrum. Just as search expands its role in so will Resolution Media. We are continuing to evolve our services to meet our clients' digital needs, whether they are website based, mobile, social or other digital platforms; we stand ready to help navigate the dynamic digital landscape.
Also we’re connected globally. Our entrepreneurial spirit is backed by Omnicom Media Group, which allows us to tap into our global network of agency partners to deliver in-region expertise to our clients. Whether you’re looking for the best digitally integrated full service solution, or if you’re trying to identify a great creative partner, we will service your business by considering local behavior, in-region translations and identifying the best solutions for your global business needs.
1. Omnicom Buys Search Agency Resolution Media. Directing Marketing News, November 2005
2. Omnicom Establishes Resolution Media as Global Search Agency. PR Newwire.com, June 2012
I noticed after seeing the deletion of revisions in the Abigail and Brittany Hensel article that you also blocked Helvitica Bold ( talk · contribs · block log) indefinitely, as a "Vandalism-only account"; but from the user's contribution history it appears that only the last one or two contributions could be labeled as such, the rest appear to have been constructive (maybe the account was left logged in somewhere or the password was broken?). An indefinite block with no prior warning to the user seems to be skipping a bit of normal process. John Darrow ( talk) 06:48, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
- Perhaps I should have selected "Vandalism" as opposed to "Vandalism-only account" in the block rationale dropdown. In addition to the edit to Abigail and Brittany Hensel article that required revision deletion due to its content, I noticed additional edits that made the account suspect: 1 2 In addition to these, I'm not sure if you had access to the following, but this is an excerpt from the userpage, which was deleted following the block:
- "She does still date occasionally, but Helvitica has high moral standards: she only dates very good, upstanding, clean-looking, familiar long-time titty-bar customers. Or anyone she doesn't think is a cop or a shill for her boss making sure she isn't selling her "two nipples, [nicely-trimmed sex organ], and your little smart-whore ASS hole again and putting my business in peril from the law god dammit".
- Finally, if this user page distracts you, do what the Shaman of the New York Algonquin tribe did when physical desire became unendurable:
- MASTURBATE!"
- The user also concludes on her userpage by stating the following: "[She is] eager to read this when she's sober to see WTF she posted on the internet THIS time." I'm not sure if the most recent edits are an instance in which the user may have been inebriated (the userpage reads very sarcastically throughout, however) or if you are correct in that the account may have been compromised (in which case we would definitely not want to go ahead and unblock the account, least not without an appeal from the user, who would then need to take steps to then ensure the account was secured, were the unblock granted). In either case, the user has the option to request that she be unblocked. Michael ( talk) 07:50, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
Just to let you know, this user has incurred escalating blocks previously of 31h, 1 and 2 weeks, so I'm not sure that 72h will deter him much this time. I forgot to tick the box, but he resumed editing within 24h of block release. Elizium23 ( talk) 08:25, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
- Ah, thank you, Elizium23. Prior to blocking, I only noticed the block shown on the talk page. Upon closer inspection, I saw the other two in the user's block history. In light of this IP's continued disruptive conduct over time, I've increased the block to 21 days. Michael ( talk) 08:34, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for participating in my RFA! I appreciate your support. Zagalejo ^^^ 06:00, 3 July 2012 (UTC)
Hi Mike 7, may I have your attention here?-- Narayan ( talk) 18:30, 6 July 2012 (UTC)
Hello. I wish if you could provide me a copy of this deleted article or userfy it to my space. I shall be obliged to you. Thanks VIVEK RAI : Friend? 08:25, 18 July 2012 (UTC)
- I have moved the article you were editing to User:Vivek Rai/Ram Kishore Shukla for your reference. In order to make edits pertaining to the subject of the article, it would be best to expand upon the existing article at Ram Kishore Shukla. Michael ( talk) 08:34, 18 July 2012 (UTC)
Hello Mike--sorry, but what's wrong with the username of Akselwiki ( talk · contribs)? Thanks, Drmies ( talk) 01:46, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
- Hello Drmies - Usernames that could be reasonably perceived by users as belonging to users who are somehow affiliated with the Foundation may be blocked. However, the user is free to request a new name. Michael ( talk) 23:52, 25 July 2012 (UTC)
Hello, Mike. After thinking very long and carefully, I have taken the (for me) unusual step of unblocking a user you blocked without consulting you first. You blocked Helvitica Bold indefinitely, giving the reason as "Vandalism-only account". I have looked at a sample of 20 of the user's 153 edits excluding their user page, and did not find a single one that I could conceive of anyone calling "vandalism". Even if there were vandalism edits somewhere among them that I missed, this cannot possibly be described as a "vandalism-only account". The user page contained some silly editing, and it might be debatable whether to call it "use of Wikipedia for inappropriate humour" or "vandalism", but at the most it might have justified a warning. An indefinite block on a user with a significant history of positive contributions because of a silly user page seems dubious, and for such a block to be imposed without any warnings is surely unacceptable. If I have missed something which puts the block in a different light than that in which I have seen it then please let me know. JamesBWatson ( talk) 12:09, 25 July 2012 (UTC)
- Hello JamesBWatson - The block actually came following the need for revision deletion on the Abigail and Brittany Hensel article (on June 24th) due to content inserted by Helvitica Bold. John Darrow had inquired about this block on my talk page on June 27th (see above). I laid out my reasoning there and explained that perhaps instead of "vandalism-only account" I should have simply selected "vandalism". Given the editor's history (with the exception of that which was mentioned on the user page), it seemed possible that the account had been compromised. Michael ( talk) 23:14, 25 July 2012 (UTC)
Thank you for participating at my RfA. I appreciate your sentiments and hope I'll continue to see you around on Wikipedia. Take care. =) Kurtis ( talk) 16:18, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
Hi Mike 7 - I am going to reinstate a page you deleted back in 2007 - that of a band called Bussetti, who are no longer together. Disclaimer - I was their bassist. There are now several pages that mention this band, including this one, this one, and this one, plus there are several external sites that reference the band and their work (e.g. here). I hope this is OK - do get in touch if you disagree. HenryScow ( talk) 17:26, 2 September 2012 (UTC)
Mike,
I discovered today that on 24 June you deleted the article Beta Sigma Theta, and on 25 June left me a note on a potential conflict of interest regarding edits I've made over the years on the page.
I would like to open a dialog with you to have the page undeleted. I am unaware if a deletion discussion initiated, though I expect from the CSD A7 label one was not. I am on the surface unable to differentiate my recollection of the page content against most of the other local fraternities listed in List_of_social_fraternities_and_sororities#Local_organizations. I would like to ask on what criteria you deleted the page, offer mitigation to those points, and outline further evidence of notability, with the ultimate result being the undeletion of the page.
Thanks, Matt
(As a sidebar, I appreciate your dedication to the ethos of Wikipedia with the NPOV comment. I would like to note that I take the NPOV seriously, particularly in relation to subjects with which I am familiar, as I hope is evident in the body of edits and contributions I've made to Wikipedia over the years.) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wolfraem ( talk • contribs) 22:15, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
- Hi Matt - I apologize for my delay in responding. If you refer to those links, the vast majority lead to sections on individual school's pages (or pages concerning Greek life at those schools), so if you believe the organization is relevant enough, there's no reason not to merge it into the school article. Michael ( talk) 06:11, 27 September 2012 (UTC)
- Hi Mike, not a worry, I appreciate hearing back. I hope you'll forgive my continued perseverance. The organization is one of the oldest local fraternities at Michigan Tech and the last remaining chapter to survive after the schism of chapters from Beta Sigma Psi in the early 1970's. The organization has been significant to student life through its tenure, and is notable as a part of regionally and nationally relevant activities at the university. Sourcing and citing is difficult due to the unique conditions the Upper Peninsula presents—the region is very poor outside the three Universities—regional newspapers still do not have reliable internet-accessible archives and other non-periodical news sources are often still distributed purely in print. There are independent sources of information available, however—in library archives, etc.—they just require time to collect and verify.
- I note relevant deletion discussions which resulted in "Keep" determinations: Alpha Chi Alpha, Adelphikos, Talk:Chi_Heorot. All three have similar regional importance and were Kept in order to allow improvement to sourcing and expansion of content. Beta Sigma Theta is at least as relevant as those three organizations are to their respective universities and communities. Topics related to the Upper Peninsula of Michigan region are important, but by the nature of the region they are less likely to have the volume of potentially interested contributors a topic from populous regions would have. These topics are still important, however, to the quality and breadth of Wikipedia as an encyclopedia.
- To give you an opportunity to work on expanding the article (with sources and assertions of notability), I have restored the page and moved it to your userspace. To view and edit it, you can go to User:Wolfraem/Beta Sigma Theta. Please let me know if you need anything else or have any questions. Michael ( talk) 02:17, 18 October 2012 (UTC)
Thank you for taking the time to participate in my RfA. I hope that I will be able to improve based on the feedback I received and become a better editor. Automatic Strikeout 22:14, 16 October 2012 (UTC)
Hi, you deleted the article about HiSilicon, a company creating SoC for Huawei, a major worldwide telcommunication company. They was 3rd party sources in the Article (ARM.com and some other sources), so it doesn't seem to fill the {{ a7}} criteria. If necessary other reliable source like EE Times can be added. Could you then explain me why for you deleted it? Thanks Popolon ( talk) 21:00, 1 November 2012 (UTC) Here are some notables references :
- ARM [2]
- EE Times [3]
- Linaro [4]
- DigiTimes [5]
- TheStreet.com [6]
- New Electronics http://www.newelectronics.co.uk/electronics-news/hisilicon-licenses-arm-mali-gpus-to-drive-next-gen-smart-devices/42517/[]
- CNET [7]
Today only about ten companies can build this kind of ARM advanced technologies. Popolon ( talk) 22:02, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
Deletion review for HiSilicon
An editor has asked for a deletion review of HiSilicon. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review.
Hello there, a proposal regarding pre-adminship review has been raised at Village pump by Anna Frodesiak. Your comments here is very much appreciated. Many thanks. Jim Carter through MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 06:46, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
Kathleen Delaney is not Caren Manuel
Hi Mike 7, Delaney and Manuel are different persons. They are not 1 same person. Caren is only credit it for winx (4Kids) and Delaney credit it for Rouge. Delaney it's a real name of a actress not a alias of Manuel.-- Maxie1hoi ( talk) 09:22, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
When you were you born? July 19 or 20 in 1990? I prefer George H.W. Bush administration on your page than Generation Y. -- Allygggggg ( talk) 17:43, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 13:51, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi. You are now listed as missing. Should you ever return or choose not to be listed, you are welcome to remove your name. Chris Troutman ( talk) 02:48, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Mike 7. This message is intended to notify administrators of important changes to the protection policy.
Extended confirmed protection (also known as "30/500 protection") is a new level of page protection that only allows edits from accounts at least 30 days old and with 500 edits. The automatically assigned "extended confirmed" user right was created for this purpose. The protection level was created following this community discussion with the primary intention of enforcing various arbitration remedies that prohibited editors under the "30 days/500 edits" threshold to edit certain topic areas.
In July and August 2016, a request for comment established consensus for community use of the new protection level. Administrators are authorized to apply extended confirmed protection to combat any form of disruption (e.g. vandalism, sock puppetry, edit warring, etc.) on any topic, subject to the following conditions:
- Extended confirmed protection may only be used in cases where semi-protection has proven ineffective. It should not be used as a first resort.
- A bot will post a notification at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard of each use. MusikBot currently does this by updating a report, which is transcluded onto the noticeboard.
Please review
the protection policy carefully before using this new level of protection on pages. Thank you.
This message was sent to the administrators'
mass message list. To opt-out of future messages, please remove yourself from the list. 17:48, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
Following a
community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to
provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in more than one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next month. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the
Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the
re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three-year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three-year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at
WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts.
MadmanBot (
talk) 01:30, 1 October 2016 (UTC)
Following a
community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to
provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in more than one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next several days. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the
Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the
re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three-year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three-year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at
WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. —
xaosflux
Talk 03:43, 1 November 2016 (UTC)
Following a
community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to
provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in more than one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions have been removed pending your return. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated, please post to the
Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the
re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three-year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three-year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at
WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. —
xaosflux
Talk 02:45, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Mike 7. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
|
Wishing Mike 7 a very happy adminship anniversary on behalf of the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Mjs1991 ( talk) 08:58, 17 September 2019 (UTC) |
Nomination of Nina Cassady for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nina Cassady is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nina Cassady until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Jontesta ( talk) 16:12, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
Hello and welcome back to Wikipedia! I see that you have edited recently, and wanted to let you know that I removed you from the list of missing Wikipedians. If you ever decide to take another wikibreak or retire (which I hope you don’t!), you can leave a message on your user page. Glad to see you’re back! Happy editing, Lima Bean Farmer Lima Bean Farmer ( talk) 03:14, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Hello Mike 7! I hope you are doing well. I just wanted to let you know that I added you to Wikipedia:Missing Wikipedians. If you ever come back, or choose not to have your name on this list, just let me know. Hope you come back, even just to check in, Lima Bean Farmer ( talk) 21:23, 19 September 2021 (UTC)
Hi Mike 7! You're receiving this notification because you were previously listed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Biography/Members, but you haven't made any edits to the English Wikipedia in over 3 months.
Because of your inactivity, you have been removed from the list. If you would like to resubscribe, you can do so at any time by visiting Wikipedia:WikiProject Biography/Members.
Thank you! Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 19:01, 27 June 2022 (UTC)