I am often not active on WP. Please do leave notices of the following:
- A GAR commencing on an article for which I was the GA nominator or a principal editor
- A FAR commencing on an article for which I was the FA nominator or a principal editor
- Listing of an article for which I was the FA nominator or a principal editor for upcoming TFA
- An ANI report involving either myself, or an article for which I was any of the above
- A proposal to delete any of my user pages or user page content.
Thank you.
|
|
Jean Bellette for TFA
Hi Hamilton. This is just a friendly note to let you know that the Jean Bellette article, which you nominated at FAC, has been scheduled as today's featured article for March 25, 2017. If you're interested in editing the main page text, you're welcome to do so at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/March 25, 2017. Thanks! — Chris Woodrich ( talk) 01:44, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
| ||||||
 | |
| Five years! |
|---|
-- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 05:54, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
Six years now! -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 06:08, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
... and seven -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 06:38, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
... and eight -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 06:28, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
Your thoughts are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EarthCheck (2nd nomination). Vectro ( talk) 11:11, 25 July 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Hamiltonstone. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Hi, there will be a meetup in Canberra on the 20 January 2018 at 7pm, I hope you're able to make it but understand that this is very short notice. Bidgee ( talk) 12:35, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Hamiltonstone. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
|
Austral season's greetings |
| Tuck into this! We've made about three of these in the last few days for various festivities. Supermarkets are stuffed with cheap berries. Season's greetings! Cas Liber ( talk · contribs) 22:30, 24 December 2018 (UTC) |
Hi Hamiltonstone
My name is Richard Aldridge and I am new to Wiki. I have two main areas of expertise being aboriginal art and Oceanic art. I recently got a week suspension from Wiki I think for linking to my own website. The links were relevant but I think the main issue is a conflict of interest.
From what I can gather I should not link to my site but just suggest the edit and then someone else make the link? Is that correct?
Although my sites do have a commercial aspect most of my pages are well-researched information pages. I do not understand why my site cannot be linked to but my competitor's site can.
For example under the entry Australian Aboriginal artifacts "Aboriginal Weapons". www.mbantua.com.au. Retrieved 2018-04-01. is allowed to link but I was removed. I am not sure why or how the decision process works — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tribal junkie ( talk • contribs) 03:45, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
- Hello Richard. Yes, i thought the editing account Tribal Junkie might be you. There's a few different issues involved here. You are correct, the first one is conflict of interest and yes, you shouldn't be editing in ways that insert your own website links into articles.
- However, there are other issues too. The main one is to do with reliable sources. Wikipedia relies on reliable sources, and one of the questions is whether your website constitutes a reliable source. Reliable source policy is a bit complicated and depends on context, too. But the fact that you trade in the artworks, in my view, possibly undermines your perceived reliability, because you could be perceived not to have a neutral view of your subject. There are other issues around reliability - you better have a read of the policy, and ask any questions you may have, on the talk page there.
- You ask about the Mbantua link, and you say "I do not understand why my site cannot be linked to but my competitor's site can". It may well be that other links on the site are not reliable sources, or may have a conflict of interest, or may be what we call linkspam - people adding links, often under the guise of some legitimate reason, but which link to websites that sell stuff. I have spent a bit of time over the years trying to get rid of these links, especially in Aboriginal art articles. But in simple terms, two wrongs don't make a right - i don't know whether the Mbantua article meets WP:RS etc, but that doesn't make your site links okay. You are certainly welcome to question the Mbantua link on the article talk page, and someone may take a look at it there.
- Sorry if that's all a bit convoluted. My last bit of advice would be: instead of linking your website, why not link published articles about the artists, or other published sources, that you, as an experienced person in the field, are familiar with? Then there won't be any issues.
- Thanks for stopping by. hamiltonstone ( talk) 10:36, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
Hi, love the articles on female Australian Indigenous artists. Please note that well-known country-names such as "Australia/n", and common words such as "artist", are not normally linked. Cheers. Tony (talk) 04:37, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your username, "Hamiltonstone", may not meet Wikipedia's
username policy because
WP:CORPNAME. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. As an alternative, you may ask for a
change of username by completing the form at
Special:GlobalRenameRequest, or you may simply
create a new account for editing. Thank you.
- Hamilton Stone is a business. Your username unambiguously represents the name of a business. That simple. Did you really need that explained to you.
duffbeerforme (
talk) 05:10, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
- I don't see the need to be snippy. I found it pretty odd being given a warning message that begins 'welcome to wikipedia' when I have been editing for around 13 years (though I am fairly inactive these days). I'm not sure why you think that just one of the several (small and insignificant) businesses / organisations (including my own) that use the words 'hamilton' and 'stone' has somehow had its interests advanced by my editing. Personally, I would have
Considered leaving well enough alone. If you really think it necessary to take this any further, maybe raise it at
Wikipedia:Requests for comment/User names. Thanks.
hamiltonstone (
talk) 11:56, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
- I don't see the need to be snippy. I found it pretty odd being given a warning message that begins 'welcome to wikipedia' when I have been editing for around 13 years (though I am fairly inactive these days). I'm not sure why you think that just one of the several (small and insignificant) businesses / organisations (including my own) that use the words 'hamilton' and 'stone' has somehow had its interests advanced by my editing. Personally, I would have
Considered leaving well enough alone. If you really think it necessary to take this any further, maybe raise it at
Wikipedia:Requests for comment/User names. Thanks.
hamiltonstone (
talk) 11:56, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
Hello, Hamiltonstone. Concerns have been raised that your username may be incompatible with
policy. You can contribute to the discussion about it
at the page for requests for comment on usernames. Alternatively, if you agree that your username may be problematic and are willing to change it, it is possible for you to keep your present contributions history under a new name. Simply request a new name at
Wikipedia:Changing username following the guidelines on that page, rather than creating a whole new account. Thank you.
duffbeerforme (
talk) 13:20, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
duffbeerforme (
talk) 13:20, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
Template:Business in Australia has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
Störm
(talk) 20:22, 9 August 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for fixing up my changes to quoted text re. "Aborigines"/"Aboriginals". I was reading the markup and missed that this part was quoting a source. 122.105.102.26 ( talk) 06:31, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
- No problem. it's really hard to catch that kind of thing once one is in edit mode. thanks for editing! hamiltonstone ( talk) 12:57, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
|
| Hello! Voting in the
2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All
eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Hello Hamiltonstone,
Firstly, congratulations for this beautiful article : Hilda Rix Nicholas. I have translated it into French, all credits will be given.
I want to give a little more information about some of her main works (see this section of the article (in French) and the to-do list, where I try to get external links to these works). I'm having a hard time locating the works (which museum/private coll., ideally with a visual).
So this is where I need you: do you still have access to Pigot's or one of the sources you used to redact the article? Is there a catalogue raisonné where the location of these works are indicated?
Thank you, -- Daehan ( talk) 16:42, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
|
The Original Barnstar |
| Just saying thanks for all your great work on the Hilda Rix Nicholas article! Ryan (Wiki Ed) ( talk) 20:59, 19 May 2020 (UTC) |
Thank you for uploading File:Jean Belette Spells for Planting.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.
If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot ( talk) 01:00, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
- Article has been edited in response to the template flag hamiltonstone ( talk) 03:00, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
|
| Hello! Voting in the
2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All
eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
 | Good Article Nomination Backlog Drive The March 2021 GAN Backlog Drive begins on March 1, and will continue until the end of the month. Please sign up to review articles and help reduce the backlog of nominations! |
-- For the drive co-ordinators, MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 15:27, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Mellor From Rite to Ritual.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 17:38, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
|
| |
| Nine years! |
|---|
-- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 07:20, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
| Good article nominations | July 2021 Backlog Drive | |
July 2021 Backlog Drive:
| |
| Other ways to participate: | |
| You're receiving this message because you have conducted 10+ good article reviews or participated in the March backlog drive.
Click here to opt out of any future messages. | |
MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:31, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
|
| Hello! Voting in the
2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All
eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Hi there! If you're receiving this, it's because you like The West Wing—I happen to love the show, and I'm trying to set up a task force for it under Wikipedia:WikiProject Television to improve its coverage on Wikipedia. If you'd like to join, please leave your name here—hope to see you there!
If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 13:08, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
| Good article nominations | January 2022 Backlog Drive | |
January 2022 Backlog Drive:
| |
| Other ways to participate: | |
| You're receiving this message because you have conducted 10+ good article reviews or participated in the March backlog drive.
Click here and remove your username from the mailing list to opt out of any future messages. | |
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) on behalf of Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles at 21:18, 31 December 2021 (UTC).
| Good article nominations | June 2022 Backlog Drive | |
| |
| You're receiving this message because you have conducted 5+ good article reviews or participated in previous backlog drives. Click here to opt out of any future messages. | |
Ten years ago, you were found precious. That's what you are, always. -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 07:12, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for The Dying Swan
The Dying Swan has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Wizardman 16:35, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for Evo Morales
Evo Morales has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Krisgabwoosh ( talk) 22:20, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
|
The 25 DYK Creation and Expansion Medal | |
| Thank you for all your work! -- evrik ( talk) 15:34, 7 July 2023 (UTC) |
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 00:30, 28 November 2023 (UTC)