• ANTIRACISM RESOURCES
• List of language self-study programs
• Great Books of the Western World
• BBC list of 100 'most inspiring' novels
• List of highest-income urban neighborhoods in the United States
• Pulitzer Prize for General Nonfiction
• Gates books
• List of Burgundy Grand Crus
• List of cities proper by population
• List of countries by GDP (nominal)
• The World's Billionaires
• List of cities by number of billionaires
• Financial Times and McKinsey Business Book of the Year Award
• The Economist Books of the Year
• 10 best books about Wall Street
• GSelevator book list
• List of judo techniques
• Zhuangzi Bilingual Chinese-English version ( James Legge translation)

• “There are two types of people: those who try to win and those who try to win arguments.” -- flâneur Nassim Nicholas Taleb
• "Nothing is harder to put up with than the annoyance of good example." -- Mark Twain

Erythrina coralloides • Hypoestes phyllostachya• Portulacaria afra • Bougainvillea• Jacaranda • Euphorbia milii• Lantana

<ref name=""> {{cite web
| url=  
| title=  
| last=  
| first=  
| publisher=  
| date=  
| accessdate =
}} </ref>

<ref name=""> {{cite news  
| last=  
| first=  
| url=  
| title=  
| publisher=  
| date=  
| accessdate= 
}}  </ref>  
 

π

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from PricewaterhouseCoopers into ID2020. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{ copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa ( talk) 16:26, 20 April 2020 (UTC) reply

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Clergy sex abuse scandal. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 September 5#Clergy sex abuse scandal until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Hog Farm _Bacon 22:40, 5 September 2020 (UTC) reply

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Wikipedia in PRC. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 October 11#Wikipedia in PRC until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 ( 𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 09:11, 11 October 2020 (UTC) reply

A tag has been placed on William S. Pollack requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. — moonythedwarf (Braden N.) 16:32, 3 November 2020 (UTC) reply

Science

The film's plot revolves around reversing the entropy of things and people, resulting in time reversibility. ^[1] Tenet makes reference to physics concepts including the second law of thermodynamics, Maxwell's demon, and Feynman and Wheeler's notion of a one-electron universe. Christopher Nolan stated in the film’s press notes: "we’re not going to make any case for this being scientifically accurate”. ^[1] (Heroeswithmetaphors) talk 18:45, 22 November 2020 (UTC) reply

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Robert McClenon were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Bell & Ross instead.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Two copies of this page have been created, in draft space and in article space. It is not necessary to create two copies of the same page, and it annoys the reviewers. This is sometimes done in order to bypass Articles for Creation review. However, if a submitter is ready to have the article in article space, it can be moved into article space, rather than creating a copy. It is common for a page that has been duplicated in draft space and in article space to be nominated for deletion or proposed for deletion.

If the article is kept, this draft should be redirected to the article. If the article is deleted, this draft may be kept for future improvement.

See also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bell & Ross.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bell & Ross and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Bell & Ross, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{ Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon ( talk) 22:59, 22 November 2020 (UTC) reply

Hello, Heroeswithmetaphors! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon ( talk) 22:59, 22 November 2020 (UTC) reply

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{ NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 01:33, 24 November 2020 (UTC) reply

A tag has been placed on Category:Corruption in Albania requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 14:59, 4 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Hey, Heroes. I wanted to let you know that I overwrote your edit on DMX in an edit conflict as I already had two sources where yours was, but I used the citation as a means of establishing around what time DMX suffered the overdose, thereby reincorporating the citation into the article. TheTechnician27 (Talk page) 02:19, 4 April 2021 (UTC) reply

A tag has been placed on Category:Currencies introduced in 2020 indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 13:51, 1 May 2021 (UTC) reply

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Indian variant. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 May 16#Indian variant until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Bangalamania ( talk) 17:01, 16 May 2021 (UTC) reply

Thank you for your contributions. It seems that you may have added public domain content to one or more Wikipedia articles, such as Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act. You are welcome to import appropriate public domain content to articles, but in order to meet the Wikipedia guideline on plagiarism, such content must be fully attributed. This requires not only acknowledging the source, but acknowledging that the source is copied. There are several methods to do this described at Wikipedia:Plagiarism#Public-domain sources, including the usage of an attribution template. Please make sure that any public domain content you have already imported is fully attributed. Thank you. — Diannaa ( talk) 15:35, 1 July 2021 (UTC) reply

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect German officers. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 August 29#German officers until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Hog Farm _Talk 06:16, 29 August 2021 (UTC) reply

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Political instability. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 September 24#Political instability until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Jay ^(Talk) 13:57, 25 September 2021 (UTC) reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ankr is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ankr until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

^Hidden_{Lemon /}^{/ talk} 18:34, 10 October 2021 (UTC) reply

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{ NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 00:15, 23 November 2021 (UTC) reply

The article Solana (blockchain platform) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not established notability yet,

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. xinbenlv ^{Talk, Remember to "ping" me} 22:39, 1 December 2021 (UTC) reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Phoebe English is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Phoebe English until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

FossLimi ( talk) 13:31, 13 January 2022 (UTC) reply

The article Shūshoku katsudō has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Duplicate of Simultaneous recruiting of new graduates, which covers the topic in more detail.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. 747pilot ( talk) 14:41, 18 May 2022 (UTC) reply

Hello @ Heroeswithmetaphors:. I noticed you created Shūshoku katsudō, however I feel it may be redundant as it is the same thing as Simultaneous recruiting of new graduates. Perhaps we can merge the content into Simultaneous recruiting of new graduates, then redirect Shūshoku katsudō, or just delete Shūshoku katsudō. 747pilot ( talk) 13:24, 21 May 2022 (UTC) reply

Yes, I think the content can be folded into the larger article that is already specific to Japan. Thank you. (Heroeswithmetaphors) talk 16:28, 21 May 2022 (UTC) reply

You're welcome, I've now completed the merger and redirected Shūshoku katsudō. Have a good weekend! 747pilot ( talk) 20:27, 21 May 2022 (UTC) reply

I was wondering could we have a conversation about you updating my Wikipedia. I love your writing style. 72.241.22.81 ( talk) 03:57, 16 August 2022 (UTC) reply

It appears that you copied or moved text from Jackson Park (Chicago) to Garden of the Phoenix. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{ copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. DanCherek ( talk) 02:46, 20 September 2022 (UTC) reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ryan Grantham is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ryan Grantham until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

— Goszei ( talk) 06:02, 24 September 2022 (UTC) reply

Hello, I'm Btspurplegalaxy. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Audrey Nuna have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Btspurplegalaxy  💬  🖊️ 05:22, 15 October 2022 (UTC) reply

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Vladimir Makei, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. WikiHannibal ( talk) 08:47, 27 November 2022 (UTC) reply

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{ NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 00:35, 29 November 2022 (UTC) reply

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Googlenet and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 December 22 § Googlenet until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Muhali ( talk) 12:15, 22 December 2022 (UTC) reply

Hi.

I noticed you've been creating a few articles related to professional grapplers lately.

If you have time, would you mind creating pages on the following? I think they are overdue for an article

1. Orlando Sanchez (2015 ADCC winner.Recently deceased this month)
2. Lachlan Giles (ADCC Bronze Medalist and Worlds No-GI Bronze Medalist. Coach of Craig Jones as both are Australian)
3. Dante Leon (ADCC Bronze Medalist and multiple Worlds No-GI Medalist)
4. Matheus Diniz (ADCC Winner)

Since it takes time, perhaps you can create the stub pages first. Then let me know and I can add onto them.

- Imcdc ( talk) 13:53, 29 December 2022 (UTC) reply

A tag has been placed on MoonPay, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

• It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
• It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. David Gerard ( talk) 21:23, 19 January 2023 (UTC) reply

A discussion is taking place to address a potential problem with the redirect Arab colonization and it has been listed for discussion. Anyone, including you, is welcome to participate at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 February 11 § Arab colonization until a consensus is reached. Veverve ( talk) 11:53, 11 February 2023 (UTC) reply

Hi, @ Heroeswithmetaphors, I just wanted to point out that a template exists here for Brazilian BJJ athletes bio stub. Thanks Lewolka ( talk) 14:20, 27 February 2023 (UTC) reply

The redirect Elizabeth the Great has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 February 28 § Elizabeth the Great until a consensus is reached. Estar8806 ( talk) 20:01, 28 February 2023 (UTC) reply

It appears that you copied or moved text from Flávio Canto to Instituto Reação. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing requires that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{ copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Repeated violations of Wikipedia's attribution requirements may result in the loss of editing privileges. DanCherek ( talk) 02:24, 16 April 2023 (UTC) reply

Hi, I saw you included the IMDb user rating in the critical response section of Employee of the Month. Per WP:RTMC, IMDb is not considered a reliable source, particularly for ratings as it’s not based on verifiable film critics’ reviews and is user-generated. I removed it to include the Rotten Tomatoes rating only. Spectrallights ( talk) 18:54, 20 April 2023 (UTC) reply

I have removed your insertion of this image due to WP:NFC#UUI #6. The use of a non-free image when the image has an article specifically about the image outside of that specific article is usually not acceptable. I just wanted to let you know. -- Hammersoft ( talk) 21:38, 11 May 2023 (UTC) reply

Category:People from Cidade de Deus has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Bearcat ( talk) 17:38, 13 May 2023 (UTC) reply

The article ATI Physical Therapy has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no established notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SomeoneDreaming ( talk) 02:09, 26 May 2023 (UTC) reply

Thanks for your contributions to Gustavo Batista. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it needs more sources to establish notability and your article is too short, please see WP:HOW to see how to write better pages. Please use the sandbox if you want to do any more test changes. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Wafflesvarog ( talk) 19:52, 10 June 2023 (UTC) reply

Thanks for your contributions to Victor Hugo (grappler). Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because your article is too short, please see WP:HOW to see how to write better pages. Please use the sandbox if you want to do any more test changes. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Wafflesvarog ( talk) 19:54, 10 June 2023 (UTC) reply

Thanks for your contributions to Samuel Nagai. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because your article is too short, please see WP:HOW to see how to write better pages. Please use the sandbox if you want to do any more test changes. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Wafflesvarog ( talk) 19:55, 10 June 2023 (UTC) reply

Thanks for your contributions to Bianca Barreto. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it needs more sources to establish notability and your article is too short, please see WP:HOW to see how to write better pages. Please use the sandbox if you want to do any more test changes. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Wafflesvarog ( talk) 19:58, 10 June 2023 (UTC) reply

Thanks for your contributions to Gabrieli Pessanha. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because your article is too short, please see WP:HOW to see how to write better pages. Please use the sandbox if you want to do any more test changes. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Wafflesvarog ( talk) 19:59, 10 June 2023 (UTC) reply

The article Rayron Gracie has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

has not medalled at black belt level at an elite international competition yet. WP:TOOSOON and Notability is not inherited.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Wafflesvarog ( talk) 20:24, 10 June 2023 (UTC) reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rayron Gracie is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rayron Gracie until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Nswix ( talk) 20:27, 11 June 2023 (UTC) reply

Hi Heroeswithmetaphors, I work for Fabrizio Freda and have a declared COI. I see that you have contributed to articles that are related to fragrances, and I was hoping you might be willing to help with my pending edit request on the Talk page for Estee Lauder’s CEO, who is involved in the company’s fragrance line. I'd like to expand and update the article and I would appreciate your input. Thank you! Sophie-esteelauder ( talk) 19:13, 14 June 2023 (UTC) reply

Thanks, Heroeswithmetaphors. I appreciate your work on this article. I noticed you didn't include the fragrance, ESG, and philanthropy content. Is there a specific reason? Again, thank you for taking the time; I look forward to continuing our collaboration. Sophie-esteelauder ( talk) 13:23, 29 June 2023 (UTC) reply

Category:Independent watchmakers has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Pichpich ( talk) 16:59, 13 July 2023 (UTC) reply

The article Slowear has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indicators of notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. 86.88.105.173 ( talk) 11:24, 27 August 2023 (UTC) reply

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Draft:Shang Xia a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Shang Xia. This is known as a " cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Robert McClenon ( talk) 07:48, 29 August 2023 (UTC) reply

The article Drago (fabric mill) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indicators of notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. 86.88.105.173 ( talk) 13:27, 3 September 2023 (UTC) reply

Hello, I'm KyleJoan. I noticed that you recently made an edit to Jen Shah in which your edit summary did not appear to describe the change you made. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Splitting a section into three, each with its own heading, isn't a "cleanup". Please don't do this again. KyleJoan ^talk 23:59, 17 September 2023 (UTC) reply

Hello, Heroeswithmetaphors. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Gustavo Batista, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 20:07, 10 November 2023 (UTC) reply

Hello, Heroeswithmetaphors. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Victor Hugo (grappler), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 20:07, 10 November 2023 (UTC) reply

Hello, Heroeswithmetaphors. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Samuel Nagai, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 20:07, 10 November 2023 (UTC) reply

Hello, Heroeswithmetaphors. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Gabrieli Pessanha, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 23:05, 10 November 2023 (UTC) reply

Hello, Heroeswithmetaphors. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Bianca Barreto, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 23:06, 10 November 2023 (UTC) reply

A tag has been placed on Ptaha requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. ~ GB fan 19:58, 19 November 2023 (UTC) reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ptaha is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ptaha until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

CycloneYoris ^talk! 20:01, 19 November 2023 (UTC) reply

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{ NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 00:29, 28 November 2023 (UTC) reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article MINT (economics), to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MINT (economics) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot ( talk) 01:02, 8 December 2023 (UTC) reply

Hello, Heroeswithmetaphors. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Gustavo Batista".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:19, 10 December 2023 (UTC) reply

Hello, Heroeswithmetaphors. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Victor Hugo".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:20, 10 December 2023 (UTC) reply

Hello, Heroeswithmetaphors. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Samuel Nagai".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:20, 10 December 2023 (UTC) reply

Hello, Heroeswithmetaphors. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Gabrieli Pessanha".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:30, 10 December 2023 (UTC) reply

Hello, Heroeswithmetaphors. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Bianca Barreto".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:31, 10 December 2023 (UTC) reply

A tag has been placed on Category:Explosions in Moldova indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:18, 15 December 2023 (UTC) reply

such as agriculture and water supply. See WP:OVERLINK. Thanks. Not sure why the top of this page has so much stuff that normally belongs on user pages. Doug Weller talk 16:23, 26 December 2023 (UTC) reply

Why do you feel the need to change the target to Terrorism Confinement Center? I believe it was fine as it is, and you did nothing with the hatnotes. AllTheUsernamesAreInUse ( talk) 05:08, 6 February 2024 (UTC) reply

I have changed it to the way you wanted but please clean up in the future. AllTheUsernamesAreInUse ( talk) 04:01, 7 February 2024 (UTC) reply

I notice that you created a redirect to Super-Earth for TOI-715 b. By doing so you you have greatly reduced the chances that an editor will create an article on TOI-715 b. Redlinks are a better way to grow Wikipedia. Please refrain from creating redirects that could easily be an article going forward. Abductive ( reasoning) 09:19, 9 February 2024 (UTC) reply

Hello Heroeswithmetaphors!

• The New Pages Patrol is currently struggling to keep up with the influx of new articles needing review. We could use a few extra hands to help.
• We think that someone with your activity and experience is very likely to meet the guidelines for granting.
• Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time, but it requires a strong understanding of Wikipedia’s CSD policy and notability guidelines.
• Kindly read the tutorial before making your decision, and feel free to post on the project talk page with questions.
• If patrolling new pages is something you'd be willing to help out with, please consider applying here.

Thank you for your consideration. We hope to see you around!

MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 15:20, 22 February 2024 (UTC) reply

Hello, Heroeswithmetaphors. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Paraboot, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 15:05, 23 March 2024 (UTC) reply

Hi Heroeswithmetaphors, I notice you have continued to add poorly-sourced, sensationalized, undue content over my good-faith WP:BLP objections. I request that you please stop edit-warring this disputed content into the article, self-revert, and instead open a discussion about whether and how to include this content. Thank you, Beccaynr ( talk) 14:19, 24 March 2024 (UTC) reply

Rumy Al-Qahtani has been proposed for deletion by Umar shahid. JBW ( talk) 21:28, 6 April 2024 (UTC) reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rumy Al-Qahtani is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rumy Al-Qahtani until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

{ [ ( jjj 1238 ) ] } 11:57, 7 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Hello Queen of the Clouds.

You are right, this page about a supposed contestant from Saudi Arabia for the next edition of Miss Universe must be deleted. 2001:861:4801:2670:2CB1:D426:7798:C7DC ( talk) 20:56, 7 April 2024 (UTC) reply