You just beat me to a Teahouse answer; always good to see other users helping out newbies. Rubbish computer Ping me or leave a message on my talk page 16:14, 31 May 2022 (UTC) |
I noticed your comment at the bottom of the page
here. I've seen the same errors in multiple other unblock requests - for instance, here's a conversation I had with another blocked editor on the issue:
discussion (starts about halfway down the page). It seems to be due to copy+pasting {{
unblock|Your reason here}}
(as displayed when viewing the page) into the edit window while replying in visual editor mode. I haven't been able to work out what to do about it, though.
97.113.167.129 (
talk) 17:35, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2022).
|
|
Can we be friends with me? Because I wanted to help out on editing articles and help contribute to this community. My goal is to help build an encyclopedia because I want to make this articles detailed and improve on research skills. Would you like to do that as well? Thank you. -- 76.20.110.116 ( talk) 14:24, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Sure! U000drl01 ( talk) 12:27, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
I am using the iPhone app, and yesterday I couldn’t edit a page in the Dutch Wikipedia (error message: you have been blocked), nor see messages that I had received - error message: “you are not logged in” although I was logged in. Logging out and in didn’t help. I could edit a page in the English Wikipedia.
Today I can see my messages (including your response) and edit a Dutch page. Strange, but happy that it works now. Mhcstraathof ( talk) 06:42, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
hi. Thank you for your comment. Could u please help me to edit the article? I was waiting about 4 month for submission. But now I received decline. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aydan Hashimova ( talk • contribs) 11:11, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
I alerted them yesterday; they reverted it (and a bunch of other notes about their draft) off. I would assume high conflict of interest. — Jéské Couriano v^_^v a little blue Bori 18:26, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
Hello 331dot! Back in April 2022 you told me to contact the reviewer directly who rejected my draft Draft:WebID Solutions. This reviewer happens to be User:Hatchens, a now indefinitely blocked paid editor who apparently manipulated Wikipedia. I believe that the rejection was a bad faith edit, as I had previously improved the draft by addressing all its quality issues. Thus I would like to appeal Hatchens’s illegitimate and unfair rejection. Kind regards, Cyan2021 ( talk) 13:14, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Hi 331dot,
In the question about Highway 99 on Oahu, the problem isn't with Google Maps. The problem is that the map the user linked to was of the wrong thing.
I am not sure how to add this to our discussion without messing the posts there up, so I contacted you instead.
Thanks for your answer before. Stormplatter ( talk) 19:17, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
Hi 331dot, amazing that you have been here for 10 years! Regarding my draft at Draft:Wellous , would like to know under what circumstances are news articles considered to be independent and reliable sources, and when they are not.
I would also like to enquire regarding the Wikipedia brands project, and whether my ayrticle qualifies to be published under it.
Thank you very much for your time! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Briankoh97 ( talk • contribs) 06:42, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
Hi - Thanks for the Picsart edit. I noticed you’re an admin. I’m not, but tried to do some Wiki maintenance yesterday after coming across some garbled edits and going through the person’s edit history. Only two edits since April, so maybe not an issue any more with the warning I gave, but perhaps you know the best way to put this person on an anti-vandalism watch list? This didn’t seem to warrant a report on a noticeboard. What would you recommend as an appropriate action? The account is User:M.Shozab raza TimTempleton (talk) (cont) 13:20, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
Let's talk about why the page should be changed and be neutral Anshul Srivastava.21 ( talk) 21:53, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
Their attack on my talk page was the account's first edit. Should we bother trying to figure out which troll I upset? – Muboshgu ( talk) 19:47, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
In case you want to say something. Gråbergs Gråa Sång ( talk) 09:58, 26 June 2022 (UTC)
Is this one. [1] which I guess should be blocked as well. I wonder if he's a paid editor. Intedit226 says "I'm working on behalf of a legal team that is interested in ensuring the accuracy of this page, and will be happy to provide official sources/references for edits that we have suggested". Not sure if that means paid, but still this is not good. Doug Weller talk 14:50, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
This user account is a bot operated by Cobi (talk), Rich Smith (talk), and DamianZaremba (talk). It is used to make repetitive automated or semi-automated edits that would be extremely tedious to do manually, in accordance with the bot policy. The bot is approved and currently active – the relevant request for approval can be seen here. Moheet1973 ( talk) 17:49, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
In this edit (
[2]), you told an editor that they could request restoration of a G11 deleted article at
WP:REFUND. While it's technically correct that they can request that, REFUND does not restore G11 articles, nor should they, so it would have been a waste of their time to go there. If they'd made such a request, it would have just been denied. The instructions at the top of the page specifically state Please do not request that pages deleted under speedy deletion criteria F7, F9, F11, U5, A7, A9, A11, G3, G4, G10, G11 or G12 be undeleted here.
(emphasis added)
Seraphimblade
Talk to me 18:56, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
Hi, my submission was declined because the references I used, "they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies)." I read these pages. I don't have any affiliation with any of the references mentioned in the submission. The references are also stories by well known journalists and media organisations so they are reliable in that sense. The Morning Context repeatedly gets credited in many media publications like Bloomberg etc for the stories we write, should those be referenced? Or would those be also rebuked under passing mentions. I'm saying this because for a new media company, getting credited for our work in big media company is a pretty significant thing. Do help me understand and thank you for your time. AshishMishra1410 ( talk) 05:59, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
I have received your message saying " ... you may have a conflict of interest ..."
Yes, this is correct, I am part of the Board, even if only on an honorary basis: this is a medical federation, I am an engineer, I have my own IT company and I have no interest in the sector in which Femtec operates (indeed SPA and tghermal baths make me really disgusting).
I wrote this article because it seems strange to me that a Federation of 40 nations associated to WHO does not appear on Wikipedia, while many things of minor importance are published there.
If you find it useful, check it out, correct it and publish it. If you don't like it, delete it. I don't earn anything from publishing this article, I only wrote it because I thought I was doing it useful for Wikipedia. I've already wasted a lot of time publishing it because Wikipedia's instructions are insanely wordy and redundant. From your message I did not understand what I still have to do and so I give up wasting more time with Wikipedia. You have my text, do what you want.
And, of course, thanks for your support.
Massimo1940 ( talk) 11:23, 10 July 2022 (UTC) 2022 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2022).
|
Interface administrator changes
|
user_global_editcount
is a new variable that can be used in
abuse filters to avoid affecting globally active users. (
T130439)Hi 331dot,
I was hoping you could review the page Sebastian Delfi as it is ready for publish. Your assistance is greatly appreciated! Thanks! Apollosouthpaw ( talk) 13:57, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
I see you have soft-blocked this account. I was going to wait for it to become autoconfirmed (which is virtually certainly what it was aiming for) and then see what happened. The disadvantage of blocking at this stage is that it's likely the editor will now do the same process of build-up-to-autonconfirmation-then-post-spam but under a different and less obvious username, so that we may not notice it. JBW ( talk) 12:53, 14 July 2022 (UTC)
hello, thanks for your edits.
What does this tag mean? [3] 666hopedieslast ( talk) 23:15, 14 July 2022 (UTC)
Dear 331dot,
I would like to thank you for your great help. I will follow your guidance and will send an email to Wikipedia to address my case. Thank you. Scholartop ( talk) 09:42, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
Hi! I didn't mean to second-guess you here, sorry about that – I saw the linkspam and blocked without checking the talk-page. Of course you'll undo that if you think fit. Regards, Justlettersandnumbers ( talk) 09:41, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
...all while blocked via this account; 158.181.81.24 ( talk · contribs · WHOIS)
this same person has been using different IPs, all from the same range to cause disruption on multiple articles,
These are the ones I've come across so far. I saw the exchanges between them and you, along with Yamla, RickinBaltimore and Parsecboy, and thought you should know. Cheers - wolf 15:47, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
You may not know me, but I was telling a sockpuppet whom I was unaware was that, a summary on how the NFL draft works, and during me editing and stuff, you got him out of here, and I want to say thanks, although I still wrote the entire thing. He also gave me my first Barnstar, which hurts me that I got it from a sockpuppet, so thanks for getting rid of those pesky socks.
I also made a subpage for the dead and I would like to ask you if there is anyone who meets my rules you would like to add on there. Sportsfangnome ( talk) 12:42, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Courtesy message. Sorry but I disagree. That name cannot be acceptable. Blocked. -- Alexf (talk) 14:08, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
Reasonable but Murder of Kanhaiya Lal is in 2 terrorism categories yet the sources mentioned do not actually call it terrorism. Looks like pov editors keeping it in. Venkat says BLPN failed, what do you think? RSN? Doug Weller talk 11:57, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
Hello, I see you blocked 2 IP editors doing vandalism on Karine Jean-Pierre. Thanks for blocking them. Usually, that would be unnotable considering vandals are common in Wikipedia. But I noticed something pretty interesting while looking at the blocks.
You see, you blocked the IP editors at 09:08 AM (may differ wildly due to time zones). Not knowing this, I reported them to AIV on literally, 09:09 AM. Literally, a 1-minute (or less) interval between them. Needless to say, I removed the reports since they were nullified 1 minute before. Thanks again. Spodle Talk 09:37, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
I would like to report an error in the deletion of information on a page. Jungkook (the Main Vocalist of BTS) has been confirmed to have absolute pitch and this information was deleted from “the list of people with absolute pitch” page. I can provide multiple articles and sources that confirm this information. There is even a video of Jungkook proving this ability on camera. Can you please help to restore the correct information? I would greatly appreciate your help! Thank you!
Official video posted on the variety show, “RUN BTS” (Episode 150), of Jungkook proving he has absolute pitch on camera: https://m.vlive.tv › postRun BTS! 2021 - EP.150 - V LIVE
These are just several of the articles that confirm Jungkook has “absolute pitch”. I can provide you with more articles and more videos, if needed. Please let me know, thank you.
https://www.koreaboo.com/news/run-bts-jungkook-perfect-pitch-members-reaction/
https://www.sportskeeda.com/amp/pop-culture/news-miraculously-perfect-charlie-puth-heaps-praise-bts-jung-kook-s-impressive-vocals Moniinicole ( talk) 09:37, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
Dear 331dot, thank you for reviewing my draft...I would be grateful for any help that you can give me in making it worthy to be approved. It is true that I have access to limited source material, but I am adding a citation from Backstage Magazine, and I have a scanned pdf of those pages...I hope this will be sufficient! If not, perhaps you would approve it if I simply added this information about the American TV and Radio Commercials Festival to the page about Wallace A. Ross that I created seven years ago? I look forward to hearing from you... many thanks, Valerie Ross Valerie Ross ( talk) 17:35, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
Just letting you know methinks the submitter is a sock, so the draft probably won't be worked on from them. I've added it to my list of drafts to save, but I probably won't get to it anytime soon. Curbon7 ( talk) 03:45, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
I hope this message finds you well, sir. On Wikipedia, I initially communicated with you as a senior. I'm working on tasks for newcomers and completing certain tasks that make sense to me (simultaneously I am reading various policies also). Could you maybe take a moment to look over my most recent contributions to see if I'm doing okay? PlayOboe ( talk) 08:36, 3 August 2022 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2022).
This is getting spooky now! :) DoubleGrazing ( talk) 09:18, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Coasterlover1994. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to User talk:Coasterlover1994 have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. I don't appreciate unsolicited NSFW links being left on my talk page Coasterlover 1994 20:39, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
Could you please block them, this is continuing disruption. There is a short discussion on Drmies' talk page about it at User_talk:Drmies#Unrelated_disruptive_IP. ScottishFinnishRadish ( talk) 12:40, 7 August 2022 (UTC)
You recently denied my appeal requesting lifting my 'partially blocked.' I am am not requesting you to reconsider your denial, I am only asking for clarification. You stated " Since you think you have done nothing wrong, there are no grounds to remove the partial block." How do answer a double negative statement? Did you take the time to review any of my edits? In my appeal of my 'Block' (Persistent addition of unsourced content: Conflict of interest editing, use of poorly cited, poor quality sources.), I stated that on at least two occasions I asked Cullen328 to what 'unsourced content and use of poorly cited, poor quality sources., was he talking about, I never received an answer, how can I defend my self, when Cullen328 did not and would not identify what edits were 'unsourced' and what edits used ' poorly cited, poor quality sources?" How can I accept responsibilities for edits in question that have never been shared with me?
You further stated, " Having a conflict of interest doesn't mean you have to gain something from your edits." I would say that 100% the Scottish Clan pages are written and edited by members of that Clan and members of its Clan Society. Who else would be interested other than a 'Cunningham' to edit the Clan Cunningham.
How do report the interference of influencing a Wikipedia Editor into Blocking me? My Blocking only came about, after I reported an editor, editing the Clan Cunningham page, whose edits solely relied on his own self published book (Calbos.) As well as reporting that he violated two of Wikipedia’s policies. Wikipedia articles must not contain original research, and do not use Wikipedia to promote yourself. Has Calbos been blocked from editing the Clan Cunningham Page?
I look forward to hearing back from you, and reviewing your clarification to the questions that I have raised.
Thank you Steve Cunningham C. Stevens Cunningham ( talk) 17:32, 7 August 2022 (UTC)
This is the proof of his wrongdoings: User talk:Aleenf1#Edit warring about the style of place names at 1988 Winter Olympics and other articles and User talk:Aleenf1#No valid reasons for reversions.-- Hongqilim ( talk) 08:52, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
Hi :)
You declined my submission because you said there is no "significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies)."
However, you can see we have a lot of mentions, including BIG and NOTABLE news sources like the Wall Street Journal and techcrunch...
We don't have any affiliation with any of the references mentioned in the submission. The references are also stories by well known journalists and media organisations so they are reliable in that sense.
Could you please re-review? Pickadilly ( talk) 10:36, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
331dot a simple question, you recently denied appeal to lift the block regarding my editing the Clan Cunningham page citing my violation 'Wikipedia's conflict-of-interest policy' do to my relationship with Clan Cunningham International editing the Wikipedia article 'Clan Cunningham.'
How can I overcome, conflict-of-interest policy, enabling me to update and add to the Clan Cunningham page? C. Stevens Cunningham ( talk) 19:00, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Is that so? Should it be so? It seems to me that if you have an account named Ferd the Wonderburfler, and the first thing you do is create Draft: Ferd the Wonderburfler, then you are asserting that Ferd the Wonderburfler is a notable person, and thus your account impersonates Ferd and should be blocked as impersonation of someone you yourself claim to be a notable person. -- Orange Mike | Talk 14:41, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
You said this a lot nicer than I would have. PRAXIDICAE🌈 18:10, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
Hi there, Thanks for your message. I’m fairly new to attempting to edit the Samuel Barnett page. I am Samuel Barnett. The information in the personal life section on the page is incorrect. My grandfather did not die of covid. I do not come from a lineage of magicians. This information was used today in an article about me in The Guardian newspaper and has caused problems for me. It isn’t true and I didn’t realise that information was on the wiki page about me. So I went in and corrected it. Hope this explains my actions :) Many thanks, Sam Amoshunter ( talk) 20:29, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
Understood. Thank you very much for letting me know and for providing the link to do that. I appreciate it. Amoshunter ( talk) 20:58, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
I always refer to myself and the little man who lives in my tooth as "we." -- Deepfriedokra ( talk) 19:01, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
It has become clear to me I have no idea what I'm doing. I was asked to submit an article here by my boss and ended up getting myself banned. Are you able to provide some insight on how to fix the article I submitted so I don't make the same mistake. I wasn't trying to advertise or promote the brand as I was trying to (poorly) site my sources. Thanks! 23.28.93.253 ( talk) 19:34, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
Hi 331. At Afchelp, you said "Generally we don't block for impersonation unless the person has an existing Wikipedia article about them". That was for a different user, but I have always wondered about user Pete Best Beatles. His user page says he is not really Pete Best, but still, why is his username OK? I'm just curious. Thanks. 71.228.112.175 ( talk) 11:46, 18 August 2022 (UTC)
Hello there,
Can u tell me why you reverted my last edit? Not having a go at u ofc but I'm confused. It seemed like a WP:OUTING vio to me. I'm not the only one who thinks that and I didn't want Wikiholic's privacy being invaded. It seems like I've done something wrong and I'd like to understand what it is Stephanie921 ( talk) 12:34, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
Hi 331dot, User "Entertainment4Reality" has a case going on here. Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Kosnsnkjsjsbbs PravinGanechari ( talk) 14:40, 21 August 2022 (UTC)
Seems like they opened a new account at User:Sheamichael2004. Liliana ( UwU) 07:44, 22 August 2022 (UTC)
Hi there. This edit from a PR/ WP:CORPNAME user that Cullen328 blocked is a clear personal attack. I asked Cullen if he thought it would be worth revoking talk page access; he thinks it could be seen as retribution if he did it. So I'm asking an uninvolved admin - congrats, lol!
I still think it deserves some kind of a response, whether it involves revoking TPA or not. I don't like leaving the impression that lashing out with emotional outbursts and insults is in any way acceptable. -- Drm310 🍁 ( talk) 04:07, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
Regarding User:Noctown, their Draft:L E M F R E C K has been requested for undeletion by new user Contentedport. Noctown wanted to be renamed to Callingzooport. Jay 💬 18:09, 25 August 2022 (UTC)
Hey Buddy, reason for speedy deletion of viAct page I am not able to understand because my CEO asked me to create one on behalf of the company as we are featured by Forbes in Asia Top 100 List. How to create? Need your help on this. Surendra.viact.ai ( talk) 09:41, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
please forgive me for what i said to you i know ill never meet you but still i feel so bad about it Baudimoovan ( talk) 10:50, 31 August 2022 (UTC) |
News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2022).
The Teamwork Barnstar | |
Thanks for helping everyone at the teahouse today! Blanchey ( talk) 22:22, 1 September 2022 (UTC) |
Sorry if I am following protocol, I had this response on my Talk page for several day without getting a response. If I have posted this in the wrong place, please advise me, where it should be placed. Steve
Reply to 331dot re-question how will you contribute: My writings will be factual, supported by proper citations. I will keep to the facts without any editorializing. My edits should enhance the reader's knowledge of the subject matter or clarify existing writings. I will not use Clan Cunningham International (CCI) as a resource (citation), nor will I ever promote CCI through any of my writings. I will place a COI statement on the talk page associated with the page that I am editing, minor or major. As a page editor, I must remain neutral when editing and avoid conflicts with other editors. I must utilize the many Wikipedia services to ensure the integrity of Wikipedia and that of the page. I will submit my edits for peer review either utilizing Template:Request edit or COI noticeboard review prior to publishing any major changes to the page. If I am writing a new article, I will utilize the Articles for Creation (AfC) process again for peer review.
I hope I have answered your question; if you have any additional questions, I would be more than happy to respond. C. Stevens Cunningham ( talk) 17:47, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
Thanks for your information. I’m in any way upset but I would just like to ask, are there any tips you’d give me to accept the draft. To fix it, I might make a website for my band, we do have 3 hits.
But I’m just wondering if you have tips. Thanks Pop2KBass925 ( talk) 15:34, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
You've misunderstood me. I don't think it should get deleted just because others aren't notable. I'm saying it should get deleted because it isn't notable. And there's no reasons why this non-notable article of a Western politician should exist, secondarily because non-Western ones don't. I'm trying to get it nominated in the same way as WP:Articles for deletion/Death of Mikhail Gorbachev where others can vote on it. Could u please help me start a vote page? Stephanie921 ( talk) 21:11, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
Geraldo Saal has been created, which is apparently the real name of RALIE G. Best, -- DoubleGrazing ( talk) 10:56, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
Should be accepted as the Christian interpretation. My matrix of resource; Let Scripture interpret Scripture. I disagree with your decline and respectfully ask you reconsider U000drl01 ( talk) 11:55, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
It respectfully ask that you reconsider my Christian interpretation of their story. Equating King Davids comments on Sacrifices and Gods acceptance/ or rejection U000drl01 ( talk) 11:58, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
Why did you reject my edit? I know there are 1-2 misspells? Dale Leonard
U000drl01 (
talk) 12:25, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
Other than 1-2 typos and don’t understand why you did not regard my Christian interpretation as relevant. I’d like to say my expertise in this area is; let scripture interpret scripture. I believe King David’s description of acceptable and non acceptable sacrifices to God completely relevant. I don’t want to be argumentative but only to understand? Thank you Dale Leonard -U000drl01
U000drl01 (
talk) 12:39, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
Hello. You just accused me of removing content without an edit summary. This is inaccurate, as the record of my edit shows. My summary links to the Wikipedia editorial board's clear guidance on the proper inclusion of quotations in a manner that supports a neutral voice. In case you missed the link in my edit summary, here it is: /info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Quotations_and_neutrality . I encourage you to read it and re-evaluate your perspective on the quotes on question. Additionally, you may review the BLP violation notice posted here: /info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons/Noticeboard#Herschel_Walker
I will redo my edits and take a screenshot of my edit summary so that you will not be able to make the claim again. If you see a value in those quotations staying in the entry, then I encourage you to explain how they align with Wikipedia's guidance on this issue. Glenstorm85 ( talk) 15:29, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
can these be looked at? Thank you
Super_no_Ura_de_Yani_Suu_Hanashi /info/en/?search=File:Manga_volume_1.png WillsEdtior777 ( talk) 18:37, 16 September 2022 (UTC)
Deep respect and appreciation Vergth ( talk) 09:54, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
Hello. Salar Bill is a famous person and his name is mentioned in the media and reliable news such as ( https://missionmag.org/sarar-bill-iranian-fashion-designer/). Please edit his page if necessary, but do not delete it. Thanks. Arminzarei1234 ( talk) 22:47, 20 September 2022 (UTC)
Hi dear here in Iran government executed two lgbtqia activist and one pasy and internet isnt working very well! And suddenlu maybe one of my 500 verified celebrity friends made me this ! And i wanted to change it ! Can you pelaze help me? Salarbil ( talk) 10:57, 22 September 2022 (UTC)
Please accept me or delete me ! We ate under so much pressure in IR Salarbil ( talk) 22:50, 22 September 2022 (UTC)
We are in a cold war eight now in Iran and i have more than 500 global verified great friends from artworld maybe they made this article. I just saw it on google Salarbil ( talk) 23:40, 22 September 2022 (UTC)
Can u please delete it asap ? Salarbil ( talk) 23:46, 22 September 2022 (UTC)
Nyanardsan is requesting unblock. bit early, but. . . . . -- Deepfriedokra ( talk) 01:18, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
Might want to revoke talk page access for Muhammad Simon, whom you blocked earlier. Since the block they spammed their talk page, which I reverted. -- Drm310 🍁 ( talk) 14:16, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
I guess I could carry that to AN? -- Deepfriedokra ( talk) 15:49, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
If I had quarter for every time I've witnessed someone trying to change him from rhythm to lead guitar I'd have a dollar but its kinda silly that it's happened four times. Happy editing. X-750 List of articles I have screwed over 20:20, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
I've mentioned every relevant article there is to provide proof of the work done by the company. Sujandahal76 ( talk) 10:07, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
Please visit the official site www.unisupdi.education for a list of teachers with relating curricula. Watch the FB page with a foto of the campus in Zugo. Elvira Tejada Guzman Elvirabet ( talk) 11:02, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
Just a question which the reliable source that the school doesn't professor?? Elvirabet ( talk) 12:01, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
direkt_bund_bvger_B-5924-2012 (1).pdf Please read the Judgement of the court cpv.2.1 Issea is ricognized by the Swiss laws and is autorizef to confer degree Elvirabet (talk) 11:38, 27 September 2022 (UTC) Elvirabet ( talk) 12:04, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
Is this a reliable source? Il the schhol is recognized and authorized is not a diploma mills! Elvirabet ( talk) 12:06, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
Court documents are not considered independent sources? Elvirabet ( talk) 12:07, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
The source in the article is a court documents why if you write now that is not a reliable source?
Elvirabet ( talk) 12:09, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
And the notes in the articol are court documents ! Why if you don't consider them reliable source? The Giuseppe Macario alias modulato or Bianbum or Dot 21 are a reliable source? Elvirabet ( talk) 12:13, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
The indipendent source are the professor Elvirabet ( talk) 12:13, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
Whoch are the indipendente reliable sources in the article? Elvirabet ( talk) 12:15, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
Please suggest me the reliable source for you Elvirabet ( talk) 12:17, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
I look forward you reply which are reliable source in the article Elvirabet ( talk) 12:19, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
Please join me on the talk page to discuss the hockey criteria. 162 etc. ( talk) 21:03, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2022).
Regarding your message here, I'm pretty sure this user hasn't been blocked (yet)... they simply placed this message at the top of their talk page for no particular reason. I strongly suspect this editor is just messing about and wasting everyone's time on Wikipedia - they create dozens of drafts of obviously fake or unnecessary and poorly-sourced articles which they send for AfC, and they all get rejected. If they aren't a deliberate hoaxer, then I would seriously have to question their WP:CIR. Richard3120 ( talk) 16:27, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
Hi, I was just trying to figure out what happened at the HD and what to do about it; the last person to post a question seems to have wiped out c. 2-3 days' worth of messages. I would have probably reverted that, but now that you've responded to that question I don't want to just go ahead and revert your latest exchange. Any suggestions? -- DoubleGrazing ( talk) 16:58, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
Hi, while I agree that my original edit to Nobel Prize was reasonably substantial, I think it's clear and factual and improves the readability of the article. An admin asked for me to elaborate in the talk page and I did but it seems others are repeatedly reverting my edits without any commentary or discussion, simply because they are unhappy that I am changing the page and perhaps that this is an IP address and that I don't have some long-standing wiki account. 2601:547:900:DD70:0:0:0:ACE7 ( talk) 18:56, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
Six years! |
---|
-- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 06:52, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
[[User:AndyTheGrump|AndyTheGrump] keeps falsely claiming that there was "consensus" about the alleged affairs in the article's talk page, even though this is clearly not the case Kala7992 ( talk) 11:14, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
How best can i edit this article: Draft: King Mats so that it gets approved?
I will be grateful for the support. Thank you Luckimatic ( talk) 21:10, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
you are a great admin! have a good day! Lolkikmoddi ( talk) 14:21, 13 October 2022 (UTC) |
Hi 331dot. You indefinitely blocked Gareth Beyers, and I think they might possibly be back as MamboAfrica. FWIW, I came across these accounts via WP:THQ#Need help understanding Notability and what is considered when notability is not recognised, which led me to Draft:Africarare. After tagging some of the images being used in the draft for lacking permission, I end up at c:User talk:Gareth Beyers which then led me back to User talk:Gareth Beyers where I noticed the block. -- Marchjuly ( talk) 07:51, 14 October 2022 (UTC)
Hello sir, There are unconstructive edits done by user Shah bayg khan on article page of Mughal Maratha Wars. As he changed many commander names in title names and also changed war result edit please took action on him. Prathmesh Bhale ( talk) 11:59, 14 October 2022 (UTC)
Hello sir One user whose name Shah bayg khan is continuously editing wrong history on Wikipedia page of Mughal Maratha Wars. This time he added one source which clearly one sided source and most importantly sources removed by him which sourced by various historians like British,Portuguese,Mughal&Marathas. I don't understand his mentality right now it seems like he spreading propaganda.please take action on him because earlier he edited several unconstructive edits on this page and after it block this page for random users also.thank you Prathmesh Bhale ( talk) 07:00, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Hello sir, I want to ask one general question-- why in some articles like seige of janjira there is template shown at upper side?it is due to grammatical error or information error? Prathmesh Bhale ( talk) 04:29, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
Sir It's nearly 4 days since I have posted my views and references on talk page of seige of janjira as you told me to do.Atleast till today anyone doesn't objectified on it,so should I bring it on article page?if yes then when? Prathmesh Bhale ( talk) 13:34, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
I didnt get what your mean I would go ahead is it typing mistake Instead 'you' or you will edit it? Prathmesh Bhale ( talk) 14:47, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
Hello sir kindly check my editing on page I have edited page. In reference section I provided sources but i that editing is not done well and I don't know how to correct it so kindly do crosscheck on it also.thank you Prathmesh Bhale ( talk) 16:24, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
Some users without providing historical sources are changing the edits.that is random user without even login accounts. Prathmesh Bhale ( talk) 07:46, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
Hello sir as I have edited the article page it is removed by others.they said I should edit my references in correct way on reference section,please do it if you can or tell me how to edit that properly. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Prathmesh Bhale ( talk • contribs) 19:42, 17 October 2022 (UTC) As by removing my article they said your changes place the article into a (technical) state of disrepair and are saying that put seek guidance on how you can put your article correctly.please fix that error and do revise my edits if you can do so.thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Prathmesh Bhale ( talk • contribs) 19:48, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
Thanks for your response If I edit a draft many times doest it causes any problems Because its my first article I made many mistakes editing many time is necessary for me Hi melvin m ( talk) 17:15, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
Suspicious "new" editor has quickly develops an interest in article deleted awhile back; I've filed an SPI here here. OhNoitsJamie Talk 15:12, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Hey 331dot Can U Protect The Microsoft PowerPoint Page So Where Nobody will validise the page anymore Whitebunny 558 ( talk) 12:48, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
Can you see about getting some revisions hidden on this page's history? 120.21.22.48's uses of a slur have been revdeled, but subsequent posts that incorporate them haven't been. The relevant revisions are https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Wikipedia:Village_pump_(policy)&oldid=1118819994 and https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Wikipedia:Village_pump_(policy)&oldid=1118819871. Thank you for your consideration. User:Khajidha ( talk) ( contributions) 15:14, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
May I know why did you removed the link https://www.hacknitr.com/ from the page? Hemant Bajaj ( talk) 09:39, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2022).
{{
rangeblock|create=yes}}
or {{
uw-ublock|contains profanity}}
.On 5 November 2022, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article 2022 Israeli legislative election, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Pawnkingthree ( talk) 19:59, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
In the fine tradition of Numennewman ( talk · contribs), 176.83.47.202 ( talk · contribs), and 83.61.37.251 ( talk · contribs), 212.115.142.130 ( talk · contribs) has again vandalized the article at Logan Yuzna. I'm unsure what the next step in this particular dispute-resolution is, but I'm inviting previously-involved editors to the talk-page discussion. — Fourthords | =Λ= | 13:31, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
Hey 331dot, I hope all is well. Quick note that I have revoked the IP block exemption that you recently granted to Frogging101 because CU indicates that they have been editing logged out in an abusive manner. I would have usually reached out to you first, but I've gone ahead in this case since policy prevents me from saying anything specific about the cause of the revocation. I hope that's alright, please let me know if you have any concerns. Best, -- Blablubbs ( talk) 17:51, 9 November 2022 (UTC)
FYI, I've protected MC Stan as well. -- Whpq ( talk) 20:28, 9 November 2022 (UTC)
Hi 331dot. I came across Bd2media over at Commons and was going to add a comment about their user name to their Wikipedia user talk page until noticing that you already asked them about it at User talk:Bd2media#January 2015. FWIW, I found this in your user talk page archives, but I also found this from Googling "BD2 Media". I'm guessing that the UK company is not related to the Wikipedia account, but it might be mistakenly assumed to be by some. Do you think this is something that still needs addressing? -- Marchjuly ( talk) 01:12, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
Hi 331dot, as we recently discussed about 1984 Sikh Massacre, can you please clear me how i will establish that the preponderance of English language reliable sources use the term genocide to reference this event? Anti‐Sikh Riots term is given by Indian Government why we are using it here? Not a single country recognized 1971 Bangladesh Genocide but wikipediat still called it a genocide, why we have double standards? 1984 Sikh Massacre is not a riot it's a Genocide even some indian commissions highlighted that Congress Party was directly involved in 1984 Sikh Massacre (Sitting PM of india was alleged fot it & also Police is found guilty for it) is it not enough to call it a Genocide? if you don't find it right no problem but at least rename it to "1984 Sikh Massacre" The word riot is a very short and offensive word for this incident. Shubhdeep Sandhu ( talk) 11:45, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
Hi awhile back you blocked this editor - well they're back at it again, editor Drrn2k22 has reinstated the same table created by E8eY4BdnUnhxPYHr .Don't know if this needs a full SOCK review of not, thoughts. - Cheers FOX 52 talk! 07:46, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
Hi, as you answered my report about a user name I've decided to pester you for more advice please? Is there a list of banned names/phrases for user names? Some are obvious violations but some I'm not sure about. For example Deeznuts. Can you advise? Sorry to pester. Thanks, Knitsey ( talk) 17:01, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
Since you are clearly dealing with someone(Tiginbeg) that has edited here before(ie. not a new user) I would strong suggest reading this. Tiginbeg's first edit was to preach NPOV, while their second edit preaches NPA, clearly this is not a new user. Stay safe! -- Kansas Bear ( talk) 22:30, 21 November 2022 (UTC)
FYI, users, even blocked users, may remove absolutely anything from their talk pages other than declined unblock notices while the block is in effect. --jpgordon 𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 23:55, 21 November 2022 (UTC)
Hello, 331dot, I hope you are well! I noticed you were recently active and was wondering if you could help me with something. Basically, the page TUI Group has been severely vandalised. I requested protection but no admin has seen it and the vandalism is still up. I have reached 3 reverts and don’t want to go over that so was wondering if you’d be able to see if you could do anything? I did read somewhere that 3RR doesn’t apply to blatant vandalism but I still don’t want to risk it as I am a good Wikipedian and to this day have not ever edit warred. Thanks, Blanchey ( talk) 16:49, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
Hello, I was left a note on my talk page about a “conflict of interest”, with the New England Patriots. All I am is a fan of my team with a big interest in making my team’s page better and to match other great NFL team articles. Please see the encyclopedic value of my changes I have made to the page since I’ve created my account, there is so much more depth in information, imagery, and better wording, a lot of which hasn’t been updated since the last 2000s.
Old: https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=New_England_Patriots&oldid=1096088320 New: /info/en/?search=New_England_Patriots
I’ve put my heart and soul into making the page as good as it can be and more modern. Yes, I do edit a lot but it’s because a lot of things update in the current NFL and sometimes I skim over word errors or feel something needs a little more updating. I once again state I have no involvement with the real team or any immediate surrounding the team, just a fan. If I have to change my username to clear of any “conflict of interest”, so be it. I was just trying to improve the page for 2022 standards. Pats6XChamps ( talk) 19:09, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
Thank you! Pats6XChamps ( talk) 20:39, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
Hey 331dot! I'm out to you because you're a global renamer, and if any administrator knows the answer to this it's probably you folks. I received a question on my talk page ( WP:GTF for context) and the user explained that they have two separate user accounts (already declared on their user page) and was wondering if it was possible to merge the two under one username. Is that a possible feat? If so, what steps need to be taken to get there? Panini! • 🥪 16:58, 26 November 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 01:09, 29 November 2022 (UTC)