collapsing to save the fingers and scroll wheels of those who follow-- Deepfriedokra 19:19, 29 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!
Hi AR.Dmg! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
I noticed this issue as well. AR.Dmg, I'm unclear on why you felt the need to change some of the references. I understand if the series was postponed updating the date and adding a new reference, but in
these changes what was wrong with the
Mid-day reference being used to support the idea that it was a Star Plus series? Anyway, if you're going to change references, you should change the entire template, updating the title, access date, etc., or, just put a url between two ref tags like: <ref>https://www.indiatoday.in/television/soaps/story/ekta-kapoor-s-kasauti-zindagi-kay-2-delayed-new-premiere-date-revealed-1321259-2018-08-23</ref> That's the simplest solution, and these can usually be upgraded to full references fairly easily. When you put text in double brackets like {{this}}, the Wiki software interprets that as a template, and tries to process it as such. Thank you.
Cyphoidbomb (
talk) 14:48, 24 August 2018 (UTC)reply
Your recent article submission to
Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject
qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published,
reliable,
secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see
technical help). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
The comment the reviewer left was:
Being a contestant in a reality television show does not make you notable.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to
User:AR.Dmg/Kriti Verma and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to
User:AR.Dmg/Kriti Verma, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
Hello, AR.Dmg!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
Dan arndt (
talk) 09:45, 20 September 2018 (UTC)reply
September 2018
Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to
Draft:Kriti verma, from its old location at
User:AR.Dmg/Kriti verma. This has been done because the
Draft namespace is the preferred location for
Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on
my talk page. Thank you. —
Frayæ (
Talk/
Spjall) 10:04, 29 September 2018 (UTC)reply
Kriti Verma, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's
talk page. You may like to take a look at the
grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to
Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can
create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to
Articles for Creation if you prefer.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
The article will be discussed at
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kriti Verma until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Praxidicae (
talk) 17:16, 10 October 2018 (UTC)reply
October 2018
Hello, I'm
Zackmann08. Thank you for your recent contributions to
Yogita Bihani. I noticed that when you added the image to the
infobox, you added it as a
thumbnail. In the future, please do not use thumbnails when adding images to an infobox (see
WP:INFOBOXIMAGE). What does this mean? Well in the infobox, when you specify the image you wish to use, instead of doing it like this:
Instead just supply the name of the image. So in this case you can simply do:
|image=SomeImage.jpg.
There will then be a separate parameter for the image caption such as |caption=Some image caption. Please note that this is a generic form message I am leaving on your page because you recently added a thumbnail to an infobox. The specific parameters for the image and caption may be different for the infobox you are using! Please consult the Template page for the infobox being used to see better documentation. Thanks! Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 07:43, 13 October 2018 (UTC)reply
A tag has been placed on
File:Yogita Bihani.jpeg, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the
criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
It is an image licensed as "for non-commercial use only," "non-derivative use" or "used with permission," it has not been shown to comply with the limited standards for the use of
non-free content[7], and it was either uploaded on or after 2005-05-19, or is not used in any articles. (See
section F3 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) If you agree with the deletion, there is no need to do anything. If, however, you believe that this image may be retained on Wikipedia under one of the
permitted conditions then you should do two things. First, please state clearly the source of the image. If it has been copied from elsewhere on the web you should provide links to: the image itself, the page which uses it and the page which contains the license conditions. Second, please add the relevant
copyright tag.
It is a
non-free file with a clearly invalid licensing tag; or it otherwise fails some part of the
non-free content criteria. (See
section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) If you can find a valid tag that expresses why the file can be used under the
fair use guidelines, please replace the current tag with that tag. If no such tag exists, please add the {{
non-free fair use in|article name that the file is used in}} tag, along with a brief explanation of why this constitutes fair use of the file. If the file has been deleted, you can re-upload it, but please ensure you place the correct tag on it.
The image appears to be a blatant
copyright infringement. (See
section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be
blocked from editing.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by
visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with
Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 07:45, 13 October 2018 (UTC)reply
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to
Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at
WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the
bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at
Wikipedia talk:Non-free content.
RonBot (
talk) 17:08, 13 October 2018 (UTC)reply
Image formatting in infoboxes
Hi there, re:
this and
this, images in the infobox should not be formatted this way, because we don't want to have windows within the Infobox window. The correct way:
|image = Kriti_Verma.jpeg
|caption =Verma at home
You'll notice that you don't need the "File:" before the image name, and the caption goes in its own parameter. Please also note that we shouldn't be describing the subjects as "KV" and "YB". We would use their surnames. Thank you.
Cyphoidbomb (
talk) 18:03, 13 October 2018 (UTC)reply
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to
Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at
WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the
bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at
Wikipedia talk:Non-free content.
RonBot (
talk) 17:05, 14 October 2018 (UTC)reply
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to
Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at
WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the
bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at
Wikipedia talk:Non-free content.
RonBot (
talk) 17:37, 14 October 2018 (UTC)reply
Orphaned non-free image File:Priyank Sharma.jpeg
⚠ Thanks for uploading File:Priyank Sharma.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a
claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see
our policy for non-free media).
⚠ Thanks for uploading File:Kriti Verma.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a
claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see
our policy for non-free media).
⚠ Thanks for uploading File:Priyank Sharma.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a
claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see
our policy for non-free media).
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these
opt-out instructions. Thanks,
DPL bot (
talk) 09:27, 5 November 2018 (UTC)reply
Orphaned non-free image File:Priyank Sharma.jpeg
⚠ Thanks for uploading File:Priyank Sharma.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a
claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see
our policy for non-free media).
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to
Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at
WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the
bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at
Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See
User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages.
RonBot (
talk) 18:06, 24 November 2018 (UTC)reply
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to
Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at
WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the
bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at
Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See
User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages.
RonBot (
talk) 17:59, 25 November 2018 (UTC)reply
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to
Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at
WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the
bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at
Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See
User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages.
RonBot (
talk) 18:00, 25 November 2018 (UTC)reply
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to
Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at
WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the
bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at
Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See
User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages.
RonBot (
talk) 18:02, 25 November 2018 (UTC)reply
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to
Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at
WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the
bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at
Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See
User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages.
RonBot (
talk) 18:03, 25 November 2018 (UTC)reply
Please stop uploading images!
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. We always appreciate when users upload files. However, it appears that one or more of the files you have uploaded or added to a page may fail our
non-free policy. Most often, this involves editors uploading or using a copyrighted file of a living person. For other possible reasons, please read up on our
Non-free criteria. If you have any questions please ask them at the
Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
DMacks (
talk) 14:02, 26 November 2018 (UTC)reply
I see you have also tagged the photographs of people as "This image is of a drawing, painting, print, or other two-dimensional work of art," and other incorrect and self-contradictory licensing tags. Please read carefully what you are posting.
DMacks (
talk) 14:05, 26 November 2018 (UTC)reply
Replaceable fair use File:Zack knight.jpeg
Thanks for uploading File:Zack knight.jpeg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of
fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the
first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:
Go to
the file description page and add the text {{
Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}}below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On
the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the
non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the
Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
DMacks (
talk) 14:03, 26 November 2018 (UTC)reply
Replaceable fair use File:Sweta singh.jpeg
Thanks for uploading File:Sweta singh.jpeg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of
fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the
first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:
Go to
the file description page and add the text {{
Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}}below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On
the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the
non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the
Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
DMacks (
talk) 14:03, 26 November 2018 (UTC)reply
Replaceable fair use File:Dp dibangna.jpeg
Thanks for uploading File:Dp dibangna.jpeg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of
fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the
first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:
Go to
the file description page and add the text {{
Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}}below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On
the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the
non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the
Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
DMacks (
talk) 14:04, 26 November 2018 (UTC)reply
Replaceable fair use File:Anjanaomkashyap.jpeg
Thanks for uploading File:Anjanaomkashyap.jpeg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of
fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the
first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:
Go to
the file description page and add the text {{
Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}}below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On
the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the
non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the
Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
DMacks (
talk) 14:04, 26 November 2018 (UTC)reply
Replaceable fair use File:Priyanka kandwal.png
Thanks for uploading File:Priyanka kandwal.png. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of
fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the
first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:
Go to
the file description page and add the text {{
Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}}below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On
the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the
non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the
Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
DMacks (
talk) 14:08, 26 November 2018 (UTC)reply
Replaceable fair use File:Charlie chauhan.jpeg
Thanks for uploading File:Charlie chauhan.jpeg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of
fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the
first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:
Go to
the file description page and add the text {{
Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}}below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On
the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the
non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the
Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
DMacks (
talk) 14:08, 26 November 2018 (UTC)reply
Replaceable fair use File:Kunwar amar.jpeg
Thanks for uploading File:Kunwar amar.jpeg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of
fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the
first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:
Go to
the file description page and add the text {{
Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}}below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On
the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the
non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the
Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
DMacks (
talk) 14:08, 26 November 2018 (UTC)reply
Replaceable fair use File:Monica khanna.jpeg
Thanks for uploading File:Monica khanna.jpeg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of
fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the
first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:
Go to
the file description page and add the text {{
Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}}below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On
the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the
non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the
Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
DMacks (
talk) 14:08, 26 November 2018 (UTC)reply
Replaceable fair use File:Baseer ali.jpeg
Thanks for uploading File:Baseer ali.jpeg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of
fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the
first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:
Go to
the file description page and add the text {{
Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}}below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On
the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the
non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the
Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
DMacks (
talk) 14:08, 26 November 2018 (UTC)reply
Replaceable fair use File:Naina singh.jpeg
Thanks for uploading File:Naina singh.jpeg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of
fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the
first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:
Go to
the file description page and add the text {{
Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}}below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On
the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the
non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the
Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
DMacks (
talk) 14:08, 26 November 2018 (UTC)reply
Replaceable fair use File:Darshan Raval.jpeg
Thanks for uploading File:Darshan Raval.jpeg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of
fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the
first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:
Go to
the file description page and add the text {{
Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}}below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On
the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the
non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the
Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
Whpq (
talk) 15:13, 26 November 2018 (UTC)reply
Replaceable fair use File:Yogita Bihani.jpeg
Thanks for uploading File:Yogita Bihani.jpeg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of
fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the
first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:
Go to
the file description page and add the text {{
Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}}below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On
the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the
non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the
Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
Whpq (
talk) 15:14, 26 November 2018 (UTC)reply
Replaceable fair use File:Krissann barretto.jpeg
Thanks for uploading File:Krissann barretto.jpeg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of
fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the
first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:
Go to
the file description page and add the text {{
Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}}below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On
the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the
non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the
Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
Whpq (
talk) 15:15, 26 November 2018 (UTC)reply
Replaceable fair use File:Monica sharma.jpeg
Thanks for uploading File:Monica sharma.jpeg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of
fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the
first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:
Go to
the file description page and add the text {{
Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}}below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On
the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the
non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the
Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
Whpq (
talk) 15:15, 26 November 2018 (UTC)reply
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to
Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at
WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the
bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at
Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See
User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages.
RonBot (
talk) 18:00, 26 November 2018 (UTC)reply
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to
Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at
WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the
bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at
Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See
User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages.
RonBot (
talk) 18:01, 26 November 2018 (UTC)reply
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to
Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at
WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the
bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at
Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See
User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages.
RonBot (
talk) 18:01, 26 November 2018 (UTC)reply
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to
Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at
WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the
bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at
Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See
User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages.
RonBot (
talk) 18:10, 26 November 2018 (UTC)reply
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to
Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at
WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the
bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at
Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See
User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages.
RonBot (
talk) 18:10, 26 November 2018 (UTC)reply
Orphaned non-free image File:Anjanaomkashyap.jpeg
⚠ Thanks for uploading File:Anjanaomkashyap.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a
claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see
our policy for non-free media).
⚠ Thanks for uploading File:Baseer ali.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a
claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see
our policy for non-free media).
⚠ Thanks for uploading File:Charlie chauhan.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a
claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see
our policy for non-free media).
⚠ Thanks for uploading File:Darshan Raval.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a
claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see
our policy for non-free media).
⚠ Thanks for uploading File:Dp dibangna.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a
claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see
our policy for non-free media).
⚠ Thanks for uploading File:Krissann barretto.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a
claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see
our policy for non-free media).
⚠ Thanks for uploading File:Kunwar amar.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a
claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see
our policy for non-free media).
⚠ Thanks for uploading File:Monica khanna.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a
claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see
our policy for non-free media).
⚠ Thanks for uploading File:Monica sharma.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a
claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see
our policy for non-free media).
⚠ Thanks for uploading File:Naina singh.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a
claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see
our policy for non-free media).
⚠ Thanks for uploading File:Priyanka kandwal.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a
claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see
our policy for non-free media).
⚠ Thanks for uploading File:Sweta singh.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a
claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see
our policy for non-free media).
⚠ Thanks for uploading File:Yogita Bihani.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a
claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see
our policy for non-free media).
⚠ Thanks for uploading File:Zack knight.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a
claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see
our policy for non-free media).
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please
consult the documentation and please get in touch on
SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by
visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with
Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. ‑‑V.S.(
C)(
T) 12:15, 13 December 2018 (UTC)reply
Aadat (2019 film), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's
talk page. You may like to take a look at the
grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to
Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can
create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to
Articles for Creation if you prefer.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
Your recent article submission to
Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by L293D was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject
qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published,
reliable,
secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see
technical help and learn about
mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
The comment the reviewer left was:
Reference n 2 and 5 are dead links, all other references mention the song only once. To pass
Wikipedia's criteria for notability for songs it should have won significant awards, or have several reliable source discussing it as a main topic.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to
Draft:Meri Pehli Mohabbat and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to
Draft:Meri Pehli Mohabbat, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
Your recent article submission to
Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AR.Dmg was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject
qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published,
reliable,
secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see
technical help and learn about
mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to
Draft:Meri Pehli Mohabbat and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to
Draft:Meri Pehli Mohabbat, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article,
Sana Makbul, but you didn't provide a
reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to
include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the
referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you!
Materialscientist (
talk) 11:44, 23 January 2019 (UTC)reply
Your recent article submission to
Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject
qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published,
reliable,
secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see
technical help and learn about
mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to
Draft:Sanjivani (2019 TV series) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to
Draft:Sanjivani (2019 TV series), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to
Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at
WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the
bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at
Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See
User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages.
RonBot (
talk) 18:07, 12 March 2019 (UTC)reply
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to
Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at
WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the
bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at
Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See
User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages.
RonBot (
talk) 18:03, 14 March 2019 (UTC)reply
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to
Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at
WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the
bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at
Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See
User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages.
RonBot (
talk) 18:05, 14 March 2019 (UTC)reply
Copyright problem: I M 24 (film)
Hello, and
welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as
I M 24 (film), but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images from either web sites or printed works. This article appears to contain work copied from
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt1340778/, and therefore to constitute a
violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our
copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be
blocked from editing.
If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0", or that the work is released into the public domain, or if you have strong reason to believe it is, leave a note at
Talk:I M 24 (film) with a link to where we can find that note or your explanation of why you believe the content is free for reuse.
If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at
this temporary page. Leave a note at
Talk:I M 24 (film) saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.
Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing!
Rob3512chat?what I did 14:16, 18 March 2019 (UTC)reply
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to
Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at
WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the
bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at
Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See
User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages.
RonBot (
talk) 18:01, 18 March 2019 (UTC)reply
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to
Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at
WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the
bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at
Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See
User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages.
RonBot (
talk) 18:03, 19 March 2019 (UTC)reply
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to
Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at
WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the
bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at
Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See
User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages.
RonBot (
talk) 18:01, 20 March 2019 (UTC)reply
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to
Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at
WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the
bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at
Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See
User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages.
RonBot (
talk) 18:02, 20 March 2019 (UTC)reply
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to
Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at
WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the
bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at
Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See
User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages.
RonBot (
talk) 18:04, 21 March 2019 (UTC)reply
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to
Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at
WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the
bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at
Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See
User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages.
RonBot (
talk) 18:00, 22 March 2019 (UTC)reply
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to
Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at
WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the
bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at
Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See
User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages.
RonBot (
talk) 18:02, 22 March 2019 (UTC)reply
Excuse me
Can you kindly explain to me the reason why when you applied for New page reviewer rights, you
copiedmy earlier request almost 100% word by word? I feel this doesn’t help you one bit - it’s incredibly dishonest and shows you don’t understand, deep down in our heart, what you are applying for. (You also claimed that you created “Good Article” - but I couldn’t find any article you created that had that status.
Wikipedia:Good articles.) Warm regards,
Zingaresetalk ·
contribs 20:59, 23 March 2019 (UTC)reply
some important guidelines
Please read these TV articles related guidelines properly.
WP:ICTFSOURCES - WikiProject Film/Indian cinema task force Guidelines on sources for films and TV
WP:NOTTVGUIDE - Wikipedia is not TV guide so we don't add information like Time slots and other airing history
WP:CRYSTAL- Wikipedia is Not Crystal ball so we don't add scheduled or expected future events like adding end date of the series before the actual date and updating episodes in advance.
WP:PROTAGONIST - We don't add interpretive labels like Protagonist, Antagonist, Lead and supporting roles.
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to
Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at
WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the
bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at
Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See
User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages.
RonBot (
talk) 18:03, 24 March 2019 (UTC)reply
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to
Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at
WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the
bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at
Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See
User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages.
RonBot (
talk) 18:04, 24 March 2019 (UTC)reply
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to
Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at
WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the
bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at
Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See
User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages.
RonBot (
talk) 18:05, 24 March 2019 (UTC)reply
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to
Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at
WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the
bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at
Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See
User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages.
RonBot (
talk) 18:07, 25 March 2019 (UTC)reply
Munni
Dear AR.Dmg! Can you upload cover of music video
Munni Badnaam Hui which showed Malaika Arora? Thank you! --
178.66.99.148 (
talk) 17:40, 26 March 2019 (UTC)reply
Dear AR.Dmg! Can you make an article Fevicol Se upload cover of music video
Fevicol Se which showed Kareena Kapoor? Thank you! --
178.66.99.148 (
talk) 17:40, 26 March 2019 (UTC)reply
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to
Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at
WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the
bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at
Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See
User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages.
RonBot (
talk) 18:08, 26 March 2019 (UTC)reply
Your recent article submission to
Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Nerd1a4i was:
The references are all about the singer, not the actual song. No evidence that the song is actually notable.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to
Draft:Meri Pehli Mohabbat and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to
Draft:Meri Pehli Mohabbat, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and
will be deleted.
A tag has been placed on
File:Munni Badnaam Hui (song).jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under
section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a
non-free file with a clearly invalid licensing tag; or it otherwise fails some part of the
non-free content criteria. If you can find a valid tag that expresses why the file can be used under the
fair use guidelines, please replace the current tag with that tag. If no such tag exists, please add the {{Non-free fair use}} tag, along with a brief explanation of why this constitutes fair use of the file. If the file has been deleted, you can re-upload it, but please ensure you place the correct tag on it.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by
visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with
Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.
Whpq (
talk) 12:06, 28 March 2019 (UTC)reply
Speedy deletion nomination of Flint J
Hello AR.Dmg,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged
Flint J for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on
my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!
Message delivered via the
Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
These edits
[8][9] do not look like they were made in good-faith, certainly not when Mr. Smart LION clearly linked to
WP:NFF. You need to familiarise yourself with this content guideline if you plan to edit film articles. It reads: "Films that have not been confirmed by reliable sources to have commenced principal photography should not have their own articles, as budget issues, scripting issues and casting issues can interfere with a project well ahead of its intended filming date. The assumption should also not be made that because a film is likely to be a high-profile release it will be immune to setbacks—there is no "sure thing" production." Editors such as yourself are expected to adhere to community guidelines. If you can't prove that principal photography has been filmed, then the article can reasonably be redirected, or deleted.
Cyphoidbomb (
talk) 20:50, 13 April 2019 (UTC)reply
You
recreated it at Dabangg 3 (film), claiming others' work as your own and not complying with the attribution requirement of the CC BY-SA 3.0 license.
Hello @
JJMC89: I'm extremely sorry for what I did. But I was trying to create the article for the movie which is currently in making. But as I created the article it was like a mismatch and mistake which was done by me. And either the Wp:page mover or WP: administrator would solve the issue. But either they are not online or they are not responding. And in the previous article which I moved to drafting and was deleted had multiple ip vandalism through anonymous. So I did the action. I know I really gone wrong with my actions. I know I will be block and my privilege will be taken away from me. But I'm sorry. I will adhere the Wikipedia policy. And I will try not to know any mistakes and would edit in good faith from now onwards.
AR.Dmg (
talk) 02:41, 15 April 2019 (UTC)reply
You're not going to be blocked. Please just be more careful. If you ever need help with something, please ask at the
Teahouse,
help desk, or my talk page. —
JJMC89 (
T·C) 03:39, 15 April 2019 (UTC)reply
Sorry, I don't know anything about Indian cinema/TV. Perhaps
Cyphoidbomb would take a look at those. —
JJMC89 (
T·C) 05:05, 15 April 2019 (UTC)reply
Okk sir,@
JJMC89:. But how to connect with
Cyphoidbomb. He will help me regarding my concern.
AR.Dmg (
talk) 05:09, 15 April 2019 (UTC)reply
Article reviews
Hi, please do not request editors to review your articles as that is pushing yourself above the many other editors waiting in the que to be reviewed, thanks
Atlantic306 (
talk) 15:37, 16 April 2019 (UTC)reply
Ok sir. I'm extremely very sorry that I requested to my fellow editor to review my article. I know you are very busy helping Wikipedia to grow. And I wasted your valuable. I'm Sorry. And thanks.
AR.Dmg (
talk) 16:38, 16 April 2019 (UTC)reply
If you need help...
If you need help understanding various Wikipedia principles, you can always ask me, or you can ask at the
Help Desk, where other folks can give you quicker answers. You shouldn't feel like you're alone and you should interact with other people, because that's the best way to learn how to edit here constructively. Regards,
Cyphoidbomb (
talk) 04:12, 17 April 2019 (UTC)reply
Thank u sir. I will definitely talk to editors regarding any issues which I will face in future to improve my editing standards. But I would just request you to keep a look into my Wikipedia edit and article contribution. As from today. I will try to upload 1 article each with no issues. And proper follow-ups of guidelines. If it wouldn't be a problem for you. I know their are many work as a admin you do. I respect your work.
AR.Dmg (
talk) 04:18, 17 April 2019 (UTC)reply
Orphaned non-free image File:SOTY2 p2.jpeg
⚠ Thanks for uploading File:SOTY2 p2.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a
claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see
our policy for non-free media).
Hi It's unclear with this statement Removing link(s) to "Dharma Productions": Because an article exist. that Why are you removing links. Can you please explain in detail. Thanks.
Sid95Q (
talk) 07:39, 21 April 2019 (UTC)reply
Hello AR.Dmg, I have reverted your removals of valid Wiki-links to
Dharma Productions. Your reasoning "Because an article exist" doesn't make sense in this context - Wiki-links are specifically meant to point to existing articles with additional related information. Assuming you used the Twinkle "unlink" feature, this feature is primarily used to remove obsolete red links to non-notable topics (for example after a clearly non-notable article has been deleted), not for mass-deleting valid blue links. It should be used "with caution" as mentioned in the Twinkle window for this function.
Assuming this was a misunderstanding, please make sure to read the documentation for Twinkle at
Wikipedia:Twinkle/doc. Also, please do not mass-edit 100+ articles when you are using a new feature for the first time. Start with 1-2 edits and double-check the results manually before making further similar edits in other articles. Hope these tips are helpful, but please feel free to ask me if you have any additional questions. Volunteers at
WP:Teahouse or
WP:Help desk will also be glad to help with any such questions. Best regards.
GermanJoe (
talk) 09:26, 21 April 2019 (UTC)reply
Hello @
GermanJoe:, @
Krimuk2.0:, @
Sid95Q: I accept and take the responsibility of the edit. I was trying to do changes with something else. But I didn't know how the serious mistake happened by me. I'm sorry to all Wikipedia contributors.
AR.Dmg (
talk) 09:48, 21 April 2019 (UTC)reply
Orphaned non-free image File:Bhoot Police.jpg
⚠ Thanks for uploading File:Bhoot Police.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a
claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see
our policy for non-free media).
⚠ Thanks for uploading File:Rooh Afza.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a
claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see
our policy for non-free media).
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by
visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with
Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. StaticVapormessage me! 21:22, 2 May 2019 (UTC)reply
⚠ Thanks for uploading File:Duniyaa (song).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a
claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see
our policy for non-free media).
⚠ Thanks for uploading File:Photo (song).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a
claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see
our policy for non-free media).
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the file's talk page.
Orphaned non-free image File:Makhna Single Cover.jpg
⚠ Thanks for uploading File:Makhna Single Cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a
claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see
our policy for non-free media).
What boundaries and limitations for extended confirmed users are preventing you from contributing to Wikipedia? You asked where you are lacking... Well, I notice on your user talk page, you have received several notices telling you that articles you have created are being deleted because the person doesn't meet the
Wikipedia:Notability guideline. If somebody has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of them, they are considered "notable". Also, you have received many messages regarding images you have uploaded. It may be a good idea to read
Wikipedia:Non-free content --
Geniac (
talk) 20:32, 11 May 2019 (UTC)reply
⚠ Thanks for uploading File:Pagalpanti.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a
claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see
our policy for non-free media).
Hi, FYI regarding
this edit, the Infobox is typically the first content at the top of the page. We don't put the lead before the infobox. I have fixed this issue in
this edit. Thanks,
Cyphoidbomb (
talk) 15:59, 8 June 2019 (UTC)reply
Pending changes reviewer granted
Hi
AR.Dmg. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" user right, which allows you to
review edits that are pending approval on pages currently under
pending changes protection and either accept the edits to make them viewable by the general public, or decline and revert them.
Keep these things in mind regarding the tool or when you're reviewing any pending changes:
A list of articles with pending edits awaiting review can be viewed at
Special:PendingChanges.
A list of the articles currently under pending changes protection can be viewed at
Special:StablePages.
Being granted and having these rights does not grant you any additional "status" on Wikipedia, nor does it change how Wikipedia policies apply to you (obviously).
You'll generally want to accept any pending changes that appear to be legitimate edits and are not blatant vandalism or disruption, and reject edits that are problematic or that you wouldn't accept yourself.
Please feel free to leave me a message on my
talk page if you run into any questions, get stuck anywhere, or if you're not sure if you should accept or revert pending changes to a page, and I'll be more than be happy to help you. If you no longer want the pending changes reviewer rights, let me know and I'll be happy to remove it for you. Thank you for helping to patrol recent changes and keep Wikipedia free of disruption and vandalism - it's a very thankless job to perform and I want you to know that it doesn't go unnoticed and that I appreciate it very much. Happy editing! :-)
~Oshwah~(talk)(contribs) 09:41, 14 June 2019 (UTC)reply
Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!
Hi AR.Dmg! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
Hi AR.Dmg! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
AR.Dmg I noticed you have canvassed admins, yet again, via Oshwah's talk page for permissions which you've recently and frequently been denied. I strongly suggest you not do this and go through the appropriate venues. You have had several requests denied, you currently have a pending request which is likely to be denied at
WP:AFC/P.
To add to that, in at least 2 of these, you canvassed more than ten administrators and now you've canvassed
Oshwah. This is a pattern I suggest you stop.
Praxidicae (
talk) 13:25, 14 June 2019 (UTC)reply
A Barnstar for you!
The Reviewer's Barnstar
This is for your valuable efforts for reviewing articles under pending changes protection. Thank you PATHSLOPU 14:28, 14 June 2019 (UTC)reply
Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!
Hello, AR.Dmg. Your question has been answered at the
Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there! Please note that all old questions are
archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by
Nick Moyes (
talk) 02:11, 16 June 2019 (UTC). (You can
remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).reply
Your thread has been archived
Hi AR.Dmg! You created a thread called WP:CSD at
Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been
archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion
here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please
create a new thread.
Hi there, please double-check your work. In
these edits you left bizarrely worded statements "The film is scheduled was released on 17 May, 2019" when what you probably meant to say was "The film was released on 17 May 2019". Thank you.
Cyphoidbomb (
talk) 15:18, 21 June 2019 (UTC)reply
Orphaned non-free image File:Kasautii Zindagii Kay (2018).png
⚠ Thanks for uploading File:Kasautii Zindagii Kay (2018).png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a
claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see
our policy for non-free media).
⚠ Thanks for uploading File:Peerh Meri.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a
claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see
our policy for non-free media).
Hello fellow adminis, please give a second chance to rectify my mistake. I will ensure that I will abide by the rule and regulation of the community. I know I had been involved in sock puppetry. but I will not break or abuse Wikipedia and my edit will be really helpful for Wikipedia.
AR.Dmg (
talk) 09:57, 2 November 2019 (UTC)reply
Request to reconsider Unblock
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an
administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the
blocking policy).
Hello, everyone, Happy Holidays. I know and I have realized my mistake. And I admit it's my mistake, when I young, childish, not too smart enough, kind of fascinated to have a Wikipedia articles. So I forcefully tried and created article Vivek Chourasia, username under Vivek Chourasia. I had earlier admitted that I was using multiple accounts to escape from a block because I was unware of the fact and the consequences I will have to face in the future. I didn't knew about it. It was really foolish and shameful of me, that I again and again violate the Wikipedia policy after getting warned also. I admit that Wikipedia policy clearly states that I have to declare all the account I'm associated with. But I never did so. All my Wikipedia account details through which I was ever been associated with are listed here. I don't want to lie, abuse, spam anymore now with anyone nor would ever try to escape a block by creating a new account. I'm ready to face the consequences. I had misused, abused, harmed, damage whatever I did it was all under the impatience behaviour. I destroy my friendly rapport with few of the admins who on the editorial ground granted rights, assisted me, sometimes guided me. I admit that I violate the Wikipedia policy. I'm sorry. I know that I'm the reason of my block. Last time when I requested for a unblock. It was mentioned that you have to wait for a period of six months to one year. But that also I can't fullfill upto. I admit I'm requesting after 5 month. But in these month I violate the rules. Which I shouldn't have done and I really regret it. Tell me what should I do to justify and prove myself that I will not harm Wikipedia anymore. I will definitely prove my loyalty to the Wikipedia if given a chance on the editorial ground based on the editing through this account. I have always taken undue advantage but would not anymore. Thanks, Please it's a humble request do consider it, if then also if my request get decline, I would just simply say thanks and sorry that I bothered you all and thanks for reading my request once
Decline reason:
As this is now a checkuser block, and in light of recent socking, no. Please read pertinent parts of the
WP:GAB.-- Deepfriedokra 19:15, 29 December 2019 (UTC)reply
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the
guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Why are you requesting an unblock here and not at your first account?
Cyphoidbomb (
talk) 15:52, 29 December 2019 (UTC)reply
@
Cyphoidbomb:, I'm requesting from here because I don't have the access of my first account by which I violate the Wikipedia policy. So I'm requesting for reconsider of unblock from this account.
AR.Dmg (
talk) 18:56, 29 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Administrator attention
Hello @
Deepfriedokra:, Happy Holidays. I admit it's my mistake that I was involved with multiple accounts which has led to the violations of Wikipedia policy d guidelines. I admit that I didn't disclose all the account to Wikipedia after repeatedly creating new various account. I didn't intend to do so but I did that in my impatient behaviour. I damage my friendly rapport with fellow editor @
Cyphoidbomb:, someone who has always guided me , support me when ever I needed the assistance regarding anything. I'm really feeling guilty that my mistakes can't be pardoned. But then also I would like to request for a reconsider though, I know that I was informed before that I shouldn't edit for a period of six to one year. But again I can't keep up to it. But again I regret it that I should keep calm. Thanks please consider my request.
AR.Dmg (
talk) 15:53, 29 December 2019 (UTC)reply
The relevant SPI is
Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Vc4137/Archive. The most recent sock there is from August 2019. There has been extensive activity in article creation and recreation. I wonder if anyone has considered the possibility of
WP:UPE. I wonder if we need a checkuser. This is not a checkuser block. Sh/W/Could it be?-- Deepfriedokra 19:02, 29 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Well, speak of the devil " 2019-12-29T19:01:42 Bbb23 talk contribs block changed block settings for AR.Dmg talk contribs with an expiration time of indefinite (account creation blocked, cannot edit own talk page) " That answers my question. @
AR.Dmg:. This is a checkuser block. Please read the relevant prtions of
WP:GAB.-- Deepfriedokra 19:07, 29 December 2019 (UTC)reply
I guess
Vc4137 was the original. I actually remembered all those talk page contents from January, 2018. I must say I am disappointed in myself for allowing users charm and seeming innocence beguile me. Correct me if I'm wrong, but is this not now a
WP:3X block?-- Deepfriedokra 19:28, 29 December 2019 (UTC)reply
To answer your question above, whenever I see someone who, over and over, furiously creates accounts to edit, there's some agenda at play, so it's likely that UPE is the case here.
Cyphoidbomb (
talk) 23:18, 29 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Hello @
Deepfriedokra:, I didn't got any response about the review
AR.Dmg (
talk) 18:58, 29 December 2019 (UTC)reply
I've just blocked three more socks, all of which were created in the last week and were editing at the same time as this account's comments. I've revoked TPA.--
Bbb23 (
talk) 19:03, 29 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Slaps head, exclaims "Ach, du lieber!" (not really, but)-- Deepfriedokra 19:10, 29 December 2019 (UTC)reply