Welcome to the Military science, technology, and theory task force. If you have any questions about articles or are generally seeking advice, you're encouraged to ask at the
main military history talk page, or you can directly approach one of the
task force participants below.
This task force covers all topics related to
military science, technology, and theory, including strategy, tactics, doctrines, and technology developed for military purposes. Topics related specifically to weaponry are generally handled by the
weaponry task force, which may be considered a sub-group of this one. Topics related to vehicles are generally handled by
weaponry task force, while land vehicles are covered by the
vehicles task force.
If you approach anyone from this list for advice or help, please check their contributions first to check if they've edited recently. This list may contain people who have not edited Wikipedia in a long time.
BusterD (
talk·contribs) (Interested in military action as communication from pre-history to the latest moment, interest in arc of development all geographic and temporal locations)
If you wish to identify yourself as a participant of this task force, simply copy and paste this userbox to your user page: {{Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Members/User WPMILHIST Military science, technology, and theory task force}}
Article statistics
The table to the right shows the current
article assessment statistics for this task force.
A list of the top 500 most popular articles within our scope, as well as the number of page views each article received over the past month, can be found
here.
With most of our articles assessed as Stub- or Start-Class, there's a lot of work to be done. However, we also have a number of
good,
A-Class, and
featured articles, which have been assessed as amongst the best Wikipedia has to offer. These article serve as a yardstick for what can be achieved and should be aimed for, and can provide ideas about how to write an article and what sources to consult; they are listed below: