Archive 2007 - 2011
Archive 2012 - 2014
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Army creole, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Profane. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:50, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Army creole, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Snafu. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:32, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
Hello! Concerning the rate of fire for the 8 inch 55 caliber guns like the USS Louisville CA 28 had - the USS Louisville #3 pictorial history book states 2.1 rounds per minute. Also, if you watch the Y-tube video it shows the USS Chicago CA 29 loading & firing the guns almost (3) rounds in a minute. Remember the guns have to be lowered to the load postion of about 15 degrees & then elevated to the fire position. (4) rounds a minute is pretty fast & the sailors in this video are really moving just to get (3) per minute. Take care! — Preceding unsigned comment added by TJATTROTTA ( talk • contribs) 20:19, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
I've dropped you an email. WormTT( talk) 12:25, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
Hi Thewellman. I know that U-173 sunk one transport while U-130 sunk three. The phrasing is a little strange. Apparently the "Final actions" section details the fate of ships first mentioned in the previous section, and I didn't pick up on that. I figured the sentence right after the one about U-130's attack should only deal with the ships hit by U-130, not those hit earlier by U-173. Howicus (Did I mess up?) 00:35, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Biosolids, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mercury. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:27, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
I got this note on my talk page by Velella and I would equally like to invite you to take a look here: "I don't know whether your experience extends to landfill leachate, but if it does I would welcome an independent view on a recent flurry of edits at Leachate and also on the talk page there." EvM-Susana ( talk) 21:10, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi, I have tried several times to correct the write up on this accident. I was the safety officer at VP-30 (P-3 RAG) at the time of this accident and we received a through brief on it. Here is the correct sequence of events. During climb out the #1 engine separated from the the aircraft (passing up and over the wing). The Navy claims, (disputed by Lockheed) that this was due to a "whirl mode" event previously seen in several L-188 (the civilian ancestor to the P-3) accidents. This weakened the wing structure causing the piece outboard of that location to fold up and and in, thus separating. This piece struck the port horizontal stabilizer, which sheared off. The aircraft due to aerodynamic force pitched nose down, then violently nose up with such force that the 3 remaining engines were flung down off the aircraft. Without the weight of engine #3 and #4 to counteract the lift force of the wing, that starboard wing broke off at the wing root. The body of the aircraft (with the inboard port wing section and starboard horizontal and vertical tail sections rolled inverted and impacted the ground, killing everyone. This is consistent with the reference provided in your text which is why I haven't added anything. Neal P. Hesser Aeronautical Engineer, P-3 Instructor Pilot, USN LCDR Ret.
I have copied the above discussion to the 1978 Maine P-3 Orion crash talk page for easier access by interested parties. Thewellman ( talk) 18:17, 3 August 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited John Garand, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Shooting gallery. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:18, 4 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:57, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from W55 into RUR-5 ASROC. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{ copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa ( talk) 18:43, 10 April 2016 (UTC)
Thewellman |
Proud to be a New Englander |
Editor of the Week for the week beginning June 25, 2016 |
An 8 year vet with a large body of article work (over 100 articles) in a variety of interests such as transportation, firearms, rivers, water and many more. Friendly and helpful, his 70% article namespace total shows an editor that is here to work. |
Recognized for |
High standards of, and dedication to, article work |
Nomination page |
Editor of the Week | ||
Your ongoing efforts to improve the encyclopedia have not gone unnoticed: You have been selected as Editor of the Week for your article creations. Thank you for the great contributions! (courtesy of the Wikipedia Editor Retention Project) |
User:Worm That Turned submitted the following nomination for Editor of the Week:
You can copy the following text to your user page to display a user box proclaiming your selection as Editor of the Week:
{{subst:Wikipedia:WikiProject Editor Retention/Editor of the Week/Recipient user box}}
Thanks again for your efforts! Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 15:27, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
The Editor's Barnstar | ||
Excellent addition to the Sanitary Sewer article on anticipated flows when relining pipes. Thanks!
|
Hello Thewellman,
thanks again for your recent improvments on the Sewage farm article.
I wanted to inform you that I just did some re-wording of the article. Some sentences I initially found a little hard to comprehend as a non-engineer and non-native speaker of English. I tried to rewrite some of them to make it easier for a person with a similar background to grasp the meaning.
I would be grateful, though, if you would look at my changes and see that my comprehension was correct and I did not adulterate the content.
In particular it wasn't really clear to me, why the sewage farms are particulary suited to arid climate (other than the need for irrigation there). So I went ahead and changed some of the wording according to my understanding but I left this sentence intact: "Arid climates may allow temporary storage of sewage in holding ponds while the soils dry out during non-growing seasons, but such storage may cause odor and aquatic insect problems, including mosquitoes."
Maybe you could explain why temporary storage (and sewage farming in general) is a feasable option in arid climates rather than in colder regions where I would expect pathogens to be less likely to thrive.
I appreciate your effort, -- KaiKemmann ( talk) 10:42, 25 October 2016 (UTC)
I removed the list of towns on the watershed template because I think that is irrelevant. Feel free to revert and discuss it with me. Moxhay ( talk) 20:11, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
Okay, thanks for pointing that out to me. Moxhay ( talk) 21:15, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
Dear Thewellman
I saw you were a member of Wikiproject Water and thought you might be interested in a project I'm working on. I'm currently Wikimedian in Residence at UNESCO and running a project to copy text from open license UNESCO publications into Wikipedia as either new articles or to improve existing articles. One of these documents is the 2016 UN World Water Development Report, Water and Jobs. If you are interested in taking part please have a look at the project here and message me on my talk page with any questions.
Thanks very much
-- John Cummings ( talk) 15:35, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Hey. You don't seem to pay attention to your talk page much, since you haven't answered here since May, but I do have a question about one of your edits. I am working on a top-to-bottom WP:TNT rewrite of Bengal famine of 1943 in my personal sandbox. Ceylon is important to that article, because rice was being exported from Bengal to Ceylon even as Bengalis were starving. Your addition of a new Prelude section (on 3&bsp;September 2015) to Indian ocean raid, diff here, sum up nicely why Ceylon was so important. However, though I have searched for a couple hours now (including in Churchill's The Hinge of Fate, which is the only listed source), I cannot locate your source... Ummm, do you remember what it was? Tks in advance. Lingzhi ♦ (talk) 04:01, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
WikiConference North America Barnstar | |
Thank you for the role you played at WikiConference North America 2016. This year's conference could not have been a success without your contributions and we hope you will continue to be involved in 2017. On behalf of WikiConference North America - Gamaliel ( talk) 00:50, 30 November 2016 (UTC) |
Thank you for your revert.
I suppose you mean these symbols: ☃☃
Actually, I did not inserted them; they happened during editing through Visual Editor for some strange reason, probably a bug or some wrong procedure I did. --
Daniele Pugliesi (
talk) 22:53, 19 December 2016 (UTC)
Wishing you a
Charlie Russell Christmas, Thewellman! |
"Here's hoping that the worst end of your trail is behind you That Dad Time be your friend from here to the end And sickness nor sorrow don't find you." —C.M. Russell, Christmas greeting 1926. Montanabw (talk) 23 December 2016 (UTC) |
From the icy Canajian north; to you and yours! FWiW Bzuk ( talk) 13:45, 24 December 2016 (UTC)
"And the angel said unto them, Fear not: for, behold,
I bring you good tidings of great joy, which shall be to all people.
For unto you is born this day in the city of David a Saviour, which is Christ the Lord."
Luke 2:10-11 (King James Version)
Tito Dutta ( talk) is wishing you a Merry Christmas.
This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove.
Spread the cheer by adding {{Subst:Xmas4}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
-- Tito Dutta ( talk) 19:56, 24 December 2016 (UTC)
An article that you have been involved in editing— USS Princeton (1843)—has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. RM2KX ( talk) 19:56, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
The article Improved Military Rifle has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Digitallymade (
talk) 13:02, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar | |
For your past and ongoing contributions to Wikipedia I would like to issue you this barnstar. May it continue to spin as your edits continue to improve the content on Wikipedia. RightCowLeftCoast ( talk) 23:54, 4 April 2017 (UTC) |
Hey, thanks for putting together the watershed navboxes for the region (not just the Merrimack one)! I was also going to take a look at the towns listed in at least the Merrimack navbox, so I was wondering if you could tell me what criteria you're using for inclusion? For instance, I would recommend adding Ashland, New Hampshire, because it's right on the Pemigewasset, but wasn't sure whether other towns in the watershed that are farther from any major river would count. -- Ken Gallager ( talk) 19:05, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
Hi again - Do you know how to make templates collapsible? I tried using the Windham County, Vermont, navbox as an example, but did not succeed in collapsing the CT River navbox. This would be sufficient for the Barkhamsted Reservoir ( Saville Dam) article, I think. -- Ken Gallager ( talk) 12:35, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
Hi - I took Chocorua off the navbox because it is the only entry that is not a town. It is a village within the town of Tamworth. Do you have any criteria for unincorporated places? Rather than try to decide whether to include, say, North Conway, Conway village, Glen, Kearsarge, etc., my suggestion is that the navbox just include actual municipalities. What do you think? -- Ken Gallager ( talk) 12:16, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
Template:User 2017 wildfire has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ >ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ< 03:15, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Just a little nudge as you got so far with it already...! How is is looking regarding that article on ponds in your sandbox? Ready to move it online? Would be great. EMsmile ( talk) 14:53, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
The Japanese used at that time the metric system with which the measurements were realized in millimeters and centimeters, not in inches. Thus, the guns of the Japanese Navy are built in exact metric measurements; the 15.5cm gun is 6.10 inches, the 46cm is 18.11 inches and the 41cm is 16.14 inches. Everything seems to indicate that, according to the sources, it is the pure Bore diameter. There are multiple sources in which the measures in these three guns are given as I have written them, including the most common as "Naval Weapons of World War Two" by John Campbell (pp. 179, 181 & 187), "Warships of the Imperial Japanese Navy" by Jentschura, Jung & Mickel (pp. 10 & 11), Navweaps.com by Tony Di Giulian: [1], [2], and [3], among many others I have looked at. Regards. -- Zumalabe ( talk) 23:11, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Hi Thewellman, I noticed that you sometimes edit related to wastewater and sanitation topics. That's great, thank you for your contributions!
I am EMsmile, and I am a part of a group of people wishing to improve sanitation-related articles on Wikipedia (which also includes topics around water supply and public health). If you have any questions about this work, please feel free to leave me a message on my talk page.
After running our first SuSanA Wikipedia Edit-a-thon for World Water Day in March 2017, we are now doing something similar but better for World Toilet Day. This drive is taking place during the two months prior to 19 November 2017. We've put together an outline of how we see this working here in our Meetup page. This time we are focussing on a select few number of articles (we have chosen 70). Also we are focussing mainly on improving their readability scores and their leads.
Can you help? Then please start editing and improving any number of those 70 articles which are listed here. And please get in touch with us on the talk page of that meetup page because it is always more fun to feel part of a team effort!
Also if you are interested in improving sanitation-related articles in general, you may want to join WikiProject Sanitation as well, which is a longer term effort, not limited to World Toilet Day.
Hi, I noticed you posted a question about this gun on the talk page of user DallasS12345. I was waiting to see if he'd actually respond. But, I see that today, as usual, he simply deleted your post without a response, not even a edit summary. (Perhaps you were able to discuss this with him somewhere else?) This is a long-standing problem with this user. When he first joined, I had to fix litterally dozens and dozens of his edits. There was a serious WP:CIR issue. And despite numerous attempts, he always refused to engage in any discussion. To date, I still think he never has. If you look at his talk page history, you will see numerous warning templates, all removed without a response. It seems the problem editing continues. I had thought of raising the issue with perhaps an admin at the SHIPS project, or maybe something else. If you have any suggestions, I'd like to hear them. If you care to take any action, you have my support. Cheers - theWOLFchild 15:20, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
...to you and yours, from the Great White North! FWiW Bzuk ( talk) 17:09, 24 December 2017 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Total metal jacket, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Abrasion ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:23, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
Good morning Thewellman. On 26 September 2017 you made a change to the " Double-action/single-action" section of the Trigger (firearms) article. The change involved inserting a comment asking for a redirect to be changed if the section wording is changed. I have inserted an anchor (see Template:Anchor) that should prevent the redirect breaking under those circumstances. I hope that helps. Regards, Anameofmyveryown ( talk) 13:39, 3 March 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I was reading the wiki article Built-up gun and it was pretty interesting, but there aren't many dates involved. It seems like most of it was written by you, do you know if the 1876 date was the start of this design or were there earlier experiments? Cheers Faulty ( talk) 12:03, 15 May 2018 (UTC)
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have recently shown interest in governmental regulation of firearm ownership; the social, historical and political context of such regulation; and the people and organizations associated with these issues. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect: any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or any page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
Just a reminder, since you haven't been notified in the past year. – dlthewave ☎ 22:16, 26 September 2018 (UTC)
Really would like your insights at User talk:Qui1che#Gauge interest in pursuing dispute resolution re the Geobox river / Infobox River Tfd and merge process. -- papageno ( talk) 00:42, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
Thank you for catching a number of mistakes that I made yesterday. In the process of revising my user script to make sure this doesn't happen again.-- Zackmann ( Talk to me/ What I been doing) 17:51, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect HMS Partridge (G30). Since you had some involvement with the HMS Partridge (G30) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. L293D ( ☎ • ✎) 17:14, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
The Original Barnstar | |
Wow, thank you! FAHansson ( talk) 23:08, 6 March 2019 (UTC) |
FWiW Bzuk ( talk) 02:14, 23 December 2019 (UTC)
Hello, I'm 180.251.249.68. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Armor-piercing bullet have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. —Preceding undated comment added 22:41, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Iron-oxidizing bacteria, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Anthropogenic ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 07:29, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
Hello! Thank you so much for replying and responding to my edits. I am fleshing out the history as I, myself, am digging into it. I am not sure if I am supposed to reply here or on my page! However, after starting to respond here, I thought perhaps I could bring the discussion to the talk page for the dog. There are still several questions I'm looking into as I'm combing through this history. Winspiff ( talk) 20:17, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
I've changed my mind! I think there are a few questions to ask you before bringing the question to the dog's talk page.
It sounds as if one of the major cases you observed is that the dogs were likely kept on the boat vessels with the fisherman. This makes quite a lot of sense. What I'd like to figure out is this:
I know that you cannot address all of these questions yourself, but perhaps some of these questions will relate to your knowledge of maritime history.
Winspiff ( talk) 20:40, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
Your experiences and research are incredibly interesting! I wanted to ask: Based on your knowledge of maritime history, where were the fisherman overwintering around 1536? The Newfoundland island is quite large, so the location of their posts, the nationalities of the people there, and how spread apart they are would have an influence on what dogs could interbreed.
Winspiff (
talk) 15:03, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
"the well man" doesn't seem to be so "well" — Preceding unsigned comment added by 119.235.251.172 ( talk) 13:00, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
Thank you for your Thanks on Ship gun fire-control system. Although I have lived in New England, I am not a native English speaker, and I would really appreciate if you could go over the grammar and polish the section Ship gun fire-control system#Pre-Dreadnought director system for its style and choice of words. Yiba ( talk | contribs) 00:59, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
Hi, regarding catapult acceleration figure in Observation seaplane, Catapult and recovery procedures,
80mph = 128km/h = 35.56m/sec, 1G = freefall acceleration = 9.8m/sec^2
In order to accelerate to 35.56m/sec in half a second: x = 35.56 / 9.8 / 0.5^2 = 14.5G, which will break the plane and kill the pilot.
If it takes 1.5sec: x = 35.56 / 9.8 / 1.5^2 = 1.6G
fyi, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i57A_WJdpHo "165mph in 2 sec"
165mph = 264 km/h = 73.33m/sec, x = 73.33 / 9.8 / 2.0^2 = 1.87G
I believe "one-half" is someone's misinterpretation of "1-1/2". Yiba ( talk | contribs) 01:07, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
Your edit to Vehicular violence in the United States has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Love of Corey ( talk) 20:24, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
The source is given in new footnotes in the amendments - principally Dodson and Cant - footnote 15 in this case.
Your edit to Vehicle-ramming attack has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Love of Corey ( talk) 10:11, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Vehicle-ramming attack, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Love of Corey ( talk) 10:11, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
Hello, Thewellman. Wikipedia:WikiProject Inclusion is believed to be inactive. It looks like you sympathize with inclusionism, but do not take an active role in this project. Thus, I will move you to the list of inactive participants after a month. Feel free to move back to the list of active participants when you are ready to contribute. 84.120.7.178 ( talk) 23:10, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
The Vanstar | ||
For creating V-2 sounding rocket. Yes, it's a bit overdue... :) |
Neopeius ( talk) 16:36, 2 March 2021 (UTC)}
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Gunpowder Mills, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages New York and Georgia.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:03, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
it still does not make sense. contract value is not consistent with the number of ships built.
what exactly does your source state? can you add an explanation to the article to explain the discrepancy? 158.181.81.216 ( talk) 19:38, 9 September 2022 (UTC)
Admiral Murray was a very important WW2 Admiral and he is hoping to get to FA status in the next month. Could you please review the article and suggest improvements of any sort (we think it is pretty good already but an experienced second opinion is super helpful). Thanks Friendofleonard ( talk) 03:01, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
Hi. On the page Arsenal of Democracy, i found you as being the one who added the list of manufacturers. The list contains some obvious inaccuracies and it would be nice to add more information (the dollar amount). i don't have access to the source document. if you are interested to help out... Nowakki ( talk) 11:30, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Newfoundland (island), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pup.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:07, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
I saw at User:Thewellman/Library that you have access to Edward Lewis' book on the St. Johnsbury and Lamoille County Railroad. Does he address at all the disposition of the Burlington and Lamoille Railroad's line between Cambridge/Jeffersonville and Cambridge Junction? I've seen anecdotal evidence that operation persisted after the Central Vermont abandoned the branch in 1938. Thanks, Mackensen (talk) 10:37, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
I wasn't thinking when I edited the page and thought that "can" was used as a verb. Removing can didn't really fix anything if that was the problem and I'm not sure what I was thinking. Sorry for that. TophatGuy14 ( talk) 06:41, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election have opened. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting will commence on 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 02:05, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 00:28, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Voting is now open for the WikiProject Military History newcomer of the year and military historian of the year awards for 2023! The the top editors will be awarded the coveted Gold Wiki . Cast your votes vote here and here respectively. Voting closes at 23:59 on 30 December 2023. On behalf of the coordinators, wishing you the very best for the festive season and the new year. Hawkeye7 ( talk · contribs) via MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 23:56, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
Thanks for tackling the Saint John River merger. Merging articles like that can be tough sometimes. Masterhatch ( talk) 20:16, 25 January 2024 (UTC)