 | Points of interest related to
Oklahoma on Wikipedia: Outline – History – Portal – Category – WikiProject – Alerts – Deletions – Cleanup – Stubs – Assessment – To-do |
This is a collection of discussions on the deletion of articles related to Oklahoma. It is one of many deletion lists coordinated by WikiProject Deletion sorting. Anyone can help maintain the list on this page.
- Adding a new AfD discussion
- Adding an AfD to this page does not add it to the main page at
WP:AFD. Similarly, removing an AfD from this page does not remove it from the main page at
WP:AFD. If you want to nominate an article for deletion, go through the process on that page before adding it to this page. To add a discussion to this page, follow these steps:
- Edit this page and add {{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PageName}} to the top of the list. Replace "PageName" with the relevant article name, i.e. the one on the existing AFD discussion. Also, indicate the title of the article in the edit summary as it is particularly helpful to add a link to the article in the edit summary. When you save the page, the discussion will automatically appear.
- You should also tag the AfD by adding {{subst:delsort|Oklahoma|~~~~}} to it, which will inform editors that it has been listed here. You may place this tag above or below the nomination statement or at the end of the discussion thread.
- Note that there are a few scripts and tools that can make this easier.
- Removing a closed AfD discussion
- Closed AfD discussions are automatically removed by a bot.
- Other types of discussions
- You can also add and remove links to other discussions ( prod, CfD, TfD etc.) related to Oklahoma.
- Further information
- For further information see Wikipedia's deletion policy and WP:AfD for general information about Articles for Deletion, including a list of article deletions sorted by day of nomination.
This list is also part of the larger list of deletion debates related to US.
Archived discussions (starting from September 2007) may be found at:| watch |
Willie Montague
- Willie Montague ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable congressional candidate. No plausible claim to notability, no coverage outside of routine campaign coverage from minor outlets. One of the most cut-and-dry cases I've ever seen. BottleOfChocolateMilk ( talk) 05:51, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians, Christianity, Florida, North Carolina, and Oklahoma. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:53, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
Delete -- Per nom, which I hate to use as a rationale, but there's really no significant coverage of this losing candidate. Central and Adams ( talk) 16:15, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
Seward, Oklahoma
- Seward, Oklahoma ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
As the subject of the article is an unincorporated community with a population of just 26 with no notable details listed about it beyond it being named after William H. Seward, it does not appear to be sufficiently notable to have an article of its own. CoolieCoolster ( talk) 12:32, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Oklahoma and US. - CoolieCoolster ( talk) 12:39, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
- Keep, We usually consider all populated places to be notable, regardless of how small their population may be. Samoht27 ( talk) 16:01, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Oklahoma. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:15, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
- Keep If there are 26 people living there, it passes WP:GEOLAND. SportingFlyer T· C 22:26, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
- merge content to Logan County, Oklahoma as census tracts and unincorporated places are not legally recognized and need to meet GNG. James.folsom ( talk) 23:05, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
- Keep It's a small community, but it's recognized as one by the U.S. Census Bureau, which means it passes WP:GEOLAND. It also wasn't too hard to find significant coverage of it in regional newspapers: [1] [2]. TheCatalyst31 Reaction• Creation
- keep We have consistently kept towns represented by CDPs. Mangoe ( talk) 02:53, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
- keep Seward is a community officially recognized by the U.S. Census and a well-recognized geographic location among central Oklahomans. There are also numerous locations with smaller populations that are still considered notable, so that is not a valid criterion for deletion. 162.129.251.104 ( talk) 16:05, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
Comment CDP are not designated by the Census Bureau, but by local authorities. So they are technically not officially recognized by that organization, the locals define them and the census gives the the statistics for them. James.folsom ( talk) 23:59, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
KZPY-LP
- KZPY-LP ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Defunct low-power station. No secondary sources at all. No significant coverage. Fails WP:GNG. AusLondonder ( talk) 05:09, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Radio, Organizations, Companies, and Oklahoma. AusLondonder ( talk) 05:09, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. Searching through google yields results that boil down to either listening to the station or information already included in the article. mwwv (converse) 12:43, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- Redirect to List of radio stations in Oklahoma#Defunct where it is already listed as preferred WP:ATD. ~ Kvng ( talk) 17:49, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
- Weak redirect to List of radio stations in Oklahoma#Defunct: this is another remnant of the looser inclusion "standards" still in place in this topic area as late as 2020 (a year before the 2021 RfC that made it clear that GNG and its requirements for significant coverage are the inclusion barometer). Outright deletion is not being outright opposed either; there simply isn't much to retain here, and it has only ever been sourced to the FCC database (which only establishes potential existence, which is neither notability nor the establishment of same). WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:57, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 06:31, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
Eternal Decision
- Eternal Decision ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
There are no references in the article and I can't find any reliable sources online covering the band. XabqEfdg ( talk) 01:38, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Music. XabqEfdg ( talk) 01:38, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Christianity and Oklahoma. Skynxnex ( talk) 04:42, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment I see plenty of non-RS, looks like they last put anything out in 2005, and their albums are still available via eBay. Not my area of expertise, but I suspect this might be saveable if someone can find reviews. Jclemens ( talk) 06:03, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
- Weak keep as they do have a staff written AllMusic bio here which states that their first album was released in 16 countries to considerable acclaim. Haven't done a full search yet, Atlantic306 ( talk) 22:06, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. I dug for sources and did not find any reliable ones. I unfortunately think an Allmusic bio is not enough when not coupled with reviews. According to this page, there exists one review in HM Magazine (formerly Heaven's Metal Magazine), but that's a bit thin as well. Scene-wise, the lack of coverage is not unexpected either, seeing as thrash metal was long out of favour when this band started releasing. Geschichte ( talk) 19:49, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Herald (Benison) ( talk) 06:13, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per Gechichte. I also cannot find anything sufficint to demonstrate notability. Fails WP:NBAND Sirfurboy🏄 ( talk) 08:39, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
- Delete I was unable to find reliable sources on the subject. Yolandagonzales ( talk) 19:57, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
Current (use {{ prodded}})