The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
WP:CFORK that doesn't warrant a separate article- its content can easily be described on the main
Christina Aguilera article and her tour articles. Snuggums (
talk /
edits) 20:24, 10 September 2014 (UTC)reply
Keep. As this just repeats basically the same argument from the last AFD, I'll also repeat my comment from it: If the concert tours all have their own pages, then this satisfies
WP:LISTPURP as a navigational index of notable topics. The bare list in Aguilera's main article is only annotated by year, with far less information than this list contains. Whether this list could be merged there is a matter of editorial discretion based on
WP:SIZE concerns. In short, I don't see why time should have been wasted on this AFD at all, and I'd highly recommend to the nominator not to just mechanically nominate every list of tours he finds as he seems to be doing (see
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Rihanna concert tours (2nd nomination), basically the same deletion rationale offered). postdlf (talk) 22:05, 10 September 2014 (UTC)reply
Rihanna's tours are irrelevant per WP:WAX, and it was mentioned both
here and
here that this doesn't offer anything that her main article and tour articles don't already give. Snuggums (
talk /
edits) 22:17, 10 September 2014 (UTC)reply
I pointed to your other pending AFD to caution you against an agenda. The last time both lists were at AFD, they were also nominated by the same editor who also just repeated a similar argument; both were kept by unanimous !votes. So please refrain from nominating any further concert tour lists until you see how these go to prevent everyone from wasting time on what are basically the same discussions on the same questions over and over.
The low-attendance featured list candidate discussions you link to each had one editor making that comment, one of whom was you. So I don't see how that is relevant here, or persuasive. postdlf (talk) 22:31, 10 September 2014 (UTC)reply
From
WP:CFORK: "[A]s an article grows, editors often create summary-style spin-offs or new, linked article for related material. This is acceptable, and often encouraged, as a way of making articles clearer and easier to manage." That's what we have here. NMUSIC is not applicable so far as I can see, except for its section NCONCERT, which you cited separately, so I'm not sure what citing to NMUSIC was intended to communicate. And re:
WP:NCONCERT, that section talks only about when individual tours merit articles, not lists of them, and this list includes four tours that have their own separate articles. postdlf (talk) 13:53, 11 September 2014 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dusti*Let's talk!* 00:46, 17 September 2014 (UTC)reply
Keep Well sourced and informative article.
Dcfc1988 (
talk) 23:27, 21 September 2014 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
NorthAmerica1000 05:05, 25 September 2014 (UTC)reply
Keep as an entirely valid
WP:SPINOUT from the
Christina Aguilera article. Per
WP:SIZERULE, merging back to the Aguilera main article isn't advised, because it's at around 133 kilobytes. WP:SIZERULE states that articles over 100 kb should "almost certainly should be divided".
NorthAmerica1000 05:10, 25 September 2014 (UTC)reply
Keep. As postdlf and NorthAmerica1000 say, this is a valid spinout that serves a legitimate function. --
Arxiloxos (
talk) 05:43, 25 September 2014 (UTC)reply
Keep per everyone above me - Shoving all this in to the main article would be chaos which is probably why it has its own article anyway, Passes GNG, Anyway I suggest this be snow closed.. –
Davey2010 •
(talk) 21:04, 25 September 2014 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.