This is a collection of discussions on the deletion of articles related to New York. It is one of many
deletion lists coordinated by
WikiProject Deletion sorting. Anyone can help maintain the list on this page.
- Adding a new AfD discussion
- Adding an AfD to this page does not add it to the main page at
WP:AFD. Similarly, removing an AfD from this page does not remove it from the main page at
WP:AFD. If you want to nominate an article for deletion, go through the process on that page before adding it to this page. To add a discussion to this page, follow these steps:
-
Edit this page and add {{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PageName}} to the top of the list. Replace "PageName" with the relevant article name, i.e. the one on the existing AFD discussion. Also, indicate the title of the article in the edit summary as it is particularly helpful to add a link to the article in the edit summary. When you save the page, the discussion will automatically appear.
- You should also tag the AfD by adding {{subst:delsort|New York|~~~~}} to it, which will inform editors that it has been listed here. You may place this tag above or below the nomination statement or at the end of the discussion thread.
- Note that there are a few
scripts and tools that can make this easier.
- Removing a closed AfD discussion
- Closed AfD discussions are automatically removed by
a bot.
- Other types of discussions
- You can also add and remove links to other discussions (
prod,
CfD,
TfD etc.) related to New York.
- Further information
- For further information see Wikipedia's
deletion policy and
WP:AfD for general information about Articles for Deletion, including a list of article deletions sorted by day of nomination.
This list is also part of the larger list of deletion debates related to
US.
Archived discussions (starting from September 2007) may be found at:
-
Self-immolation of Maxwell Azzarello (
|
talk |
history |
protect |
delete |
links |
watch |
logs |
views) – (
View AfD |
edits since nomination)
- (Find sources:
Google (
books ·
news ·
scholar ·
free images ·
WP refs) ·
FENS ·
JSTOR ·
TWL)
Here we are, a month after Azzarello's death and there's no evidence of lasting coverage or information about his significance to merit a merger elsewhere. The most recent coverage, also represented in the article, is of the donation of his kidneys. A redirect to
List_of_political_self-immolations#2020s where this is mentioned is probably more than sufficient. The AfD was well attended, but explicitly allowed revisiting it, so bringing it back here.
Star
Mississippi 18:13, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
-
Martha O'Kennon (
|
talk |
history |
protect |
delete |
links |
watch |
logs |
views) – (
View AfD |
edits since nomination)
- (Find sources:
Google (
books ·
news ·
scholar ·
free images ·
WP refs) ·
FENS ·
JSTOR ·
TWL)
Retired professor with single-digit number of publications, one with 24 citations on Google Scholar and all the rest less than 10, far from enough for
WP:PROF. All sources are by her or from her employer, inadequate for
WP:GNG. This was already draftified and restored to article space (by copy & paste) without any significant improvement; for draft history see
[1]. —
David Eppstein (
talk) 00:41, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Note: This discussion has been included in the
list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. —
David Eppstein (
talk) 00:44, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Note: This discussion has been included in the
deletion sorting lists for the following topics:
Women,
Mathematics,
Computing,
China,
Michigan,
New York, and
Virginia.
WCQuidditch
☎
✎ 08:16, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Delete. Record looks far short of
WP:NPROF, and no other notability is apparent.
Russ Woodroofe (
talk) 09:00, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Delete. She also does not meet
WP:BASIC. I found one news article talking about art pieces she makes, and nothing more.
DaffodilOcean (
talk) 10:23, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Delete. Search turned up nothing to meet notability on any standard.
Dclemens1971 (
talk) 13:13, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Delete. Nothing came up in a search that would indicate any sort of notability. Also of note, the article creator
Davidpgca (
talk ·
contribs) appears to be a
WP:SPA dedicated to writing articles on
Albion College related people and topics, including a number that may or may not meet notability standards.
nf utvol (
talk) 15:07, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Comment that, looking through images contributed by
Davidpgca
[2], all the images appear to be tagged as "own work". That appears to be true for very few of them (in particular, not for the ones that are 80 years old). Anyone know how to report at Commons?
Russ Woodroofe (
talk) 20:59, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
- I noticed that myself. I have gone in and tagged the items that are not clearly in the public domain for removal on the basis that this user is not the owner of the works.
nf utvol (
talk) 01:26, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Delete per nom. She seems to have led a neat life, but not one that rises quite to the level of encyclopedic notability.
BD2412
T 16:46, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Delete, as per the arguments above. -
Samoht27 (
talk) 17:46, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
-
Political positions of Andrew Cuomo (
|
talk |
history |
protect |
delete |
links |
watch |
logs |
views) – (
View AfD |
edits since nomination)
- (Find sources:
Google (
books ·
news ·
scholar ·
free images ·
WP refs) ·
FENS ·
JSTOR ·
TWL)
this article can probably be deleted and it's information merged with the Andrew Cuomo article since the US state governors seem to generally not have separate pages outlining their political positions
CGP05 (
talk) 02:34, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Weak merge. The Andrew Cuomo article is pretty long so I understand the idea of a split. If this article was expanded significantly I would change to keep.
Esolo5002 (
talk) 05:03, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Note: This discussion has been included in the
deletion sorting lists for the following topics:
Law,
Politics, and
New York.
WCQuidditch
☎
✎ 08:12, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Merge Short and also largely duplicative. Split wasn't needed, or at least not done like this.
Reywas92
Talk 14:58, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
-
Moxiie (
|
talk |
history |
protect |
delete |
links |
watch |
logs |
views) – (
View AfD |
edits since nomination)
- (Find sources:
Google (
books ·
news ·
scholar ·
free images ·
WP refs) ·
FENS ·
JSTOR ·
TWL)
Fails
WP:MUSIC. All of her songs are self-published and appear to have received very little attention from reliable sources. Search results for her stage name are almost exclusively the songs themselves or her social media, and results for her legal name largely pertain to her career as a makeup artist.
Majora4 (
talk) 23:33, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Delete: The two archived MTV sources (both a small paragraph each) are about all there is. I can't find anything now, 10+ years later. I don't think the singer made any critical waves; no album reviews, no charted singles.
Oaktree b (
talk) 23:42, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Note: This discussion has been included in the
deletion sorting lists for the following topics:
Bands and musicians,
Women, and
New York.
WCQuidditch
☎
✎ 00:13, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Delete - this article is a mess.
-
Fireandflames2 (
talk) 12:40, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
-
Beastie Boys Square (
|
talk |
history |
protect |
delete |
links |
watch |
logs |
views) – (
View AfD |
edits since nomination)
- (Find sources:
Google (
books ·
news ·
scholar ·
free images ·
WP refs) ·
FENS ·
JSTOR ·
TWL)
The topic of this article does not meet
WP:NOTNEWS,
WP:GNG or
WP:GEOFEAT. In short, this is one of many commemorative street names given to locations in New York City. The only coverage is
WP:PRIMARYNEWS coverage of the renaming being denied, then approved. A previous attempt to merge the content to
Paul's Boutique#Beastie Boys Square (where the content has already existed since September 2023) per
WP:NOPAGE was reverted.
Epicgenius (
talk) 10:35, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Note: This discussion has been included in the
deletion sorting lists for the following topics:
Music and
New York.
Epicgenius (
talk) 10:35, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Note: This discussion has been included in the
list of Transportation-related deletion discussions.
WCQuidditch
☎
✎ 10:43, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Restore merge location above, or merge to
Beastie Boys. Fair game to mention somewhere, but I'm failing to see why it needs its own stand-alone article when there's so little of substance to say on it.
Sergecross73
msg me 10:56, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Keep there is quite a lot of coverage on the 10 year journey. There are plenty of articles, probably over 100 plus TV coverage.. it will, be included in books and it is a designated Sq in NYc. Def passes
Wikipedia:GNG
VeniceBreeze (
talk) 18:17, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Please see
WP:MERGEREASON - even if there's sources, its a valid decision to merge things if the article is short and easily placed in the context of a related article, which perfectly fits in this situation.
Sergecross73
msg me 18:21, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
- No one looking for info on the square would go to an article about an album. I added several articles from 2014, 2019 and 2021 to show ongoing coverage but, there are thousands more and the article could certainly be improved beyond what would be appropriate for a section under Pauls Boutique. There is coverage on several votes, the guy who lobbied for it, and the tasks they had to accomplish to get it approved. I didnt write a front page article.. its 3 days old.. do what you want but there is 10 years of I n depth coverage..
VeniceBreeze (
talk) 18:41, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
- The point about "no one looking for info" will be easily met by leaving a redirect from
Beastie Boys Square.
ColinFine (
talk) 19:39, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Due to
WP:REDIRECTs and how they work, people will find it just find it just find in the merge target if they type in the name in the search bar. And if there's "10 years of coverage", then you should use that to write an article with more substance and content. Right now its quite barren. Is there anything else to say other than "they tried a couple times and eventually it happened?". There's not much more than that right now...
Sergecross73
msg me 20:54, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
- I updated it with some more info but the idea is they have a huge fanbase to contribute.. the article was 3 days old before he tried to delete it without even leaving me a message on my page.
VeniceBreeze (
talk) 05:24, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Why wouldnt anyone think this is an important site that should have coordinates and a map pin for tourists?
VeniceBreeze (
talk) 05:25, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Restore merge to
Paul's Boutique § Beastie Boys Square, which contains content identical to the article, although missing the Gothamist source. A merge will preserve the visibility of the history and the functionality of inbound links.
Folly Mox (
talk) 12:30, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
-
Hadarou Sare (
|
talk |
history |
protect |
delete |
links |
watch |
logs |
views) – (
View AfD |
edits since nomination)
- (Find sources:
Google (
books ·
news ·
scholar ·
free images ·
WP refs) ·
FENS ·
JSTOR ·
TWL)
The article subject is a non-notable entrepreneur and PhD student. I could not find any
reliable sources containing
significant coverage of the subject. None of the sources currently cited in the article establish notability:
[3] and
[4] are interviews in
trade publications that read like
puff pieces.
[5] does not have any clear editorial standards, is based on an interview, and also reads like a puff piece.
[6] is a bio and abstract for a talk he gave at a seminar.
[7] is an interview with the organizers of the same seminar.
[8] is the subject's company's website.
[9] is an advertising website.
[10] is a slideshow about a project that the subject worked on.
voorts (
talk/
contributions) 03:27, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Note: This discussion has been included in the
deletion sorting lists for the following topics:
Businesspeople,
Astronomy,
Engineering,
Spaceflight,
Africa,
Ivory Coast,
Maryland,
New Jersey, and
New York.
voorts (
talk/
contributions) 03:27, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Delete Wikipedia is not LinkedIn.
Mccapra (
talk) 04:39, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Delete: Agree with the deletion discussion above, most links given are primary or simple confirmation of employment/biographical info. The sourcing doesn't pass RS guidelines and there isn't much else I can find.
Oaktree b (
talk) 15:11, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
-
New Cassel station (
|
talk |
history |
protect |
delete |
links |
watch |
logs |
views) – (
View AfD |
edits since nomination)
- (Find sources:
Google (
books ·
news ·
scholar ·
free images ·
WP refs) ·
FENS ·
JSTOR ·
TWL)
No evidence of notability - the only source is a listing of all stations on the railroad and only gives it a few sentences. A redirect/merge to
New Cassel, New York would be fine.
Pi.1415926535 (
talk) 19:18, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Note: This discussion has been included in the
deletion sorting lists for the following topics:
Stations and
New York.
Pi.1415926535 (
talk) 19:18, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Courtesy ping
Thryduulf who deprodded.
Pi.1415926535 (
talk) 19:32, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Quoting from my deprodding rationale
If sources cannot be found this should be merged or redirected, probably to the article about the line, rather than deleted
. It seems the nominator actually agrees that this should not be deleted, so this seems like an inappropriate AfD.
Thryduulf (
talk) 19:41, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
- @
Thryduulf: I don't have any strong opinion about whether the article is deleted, redirected, or merged (with what meager information is available). However, it seems clear to me that it lacks the notability for an independent article. Given that, I'm confused why AfD wouldn't be an appropriate venue for the community to decide which of those options is best. What would you have recommended I do instead?
Pi.1415926535 (
talk) 20:08, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
- AfD should be reserved for when you are actively advocating deletion. In other situations either boldly merge/redirect or start a discussion on the talk page (with notifications to WikiProjects and/or target talk pages as desired).
Thryduulf (
talk) 20:35, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
- What happens is someone then shows up to contest it and say it's a "stealth deletion", so forgive us if we choose to take these articles to AfD. There's no way to avoid people complaining, so I'm afraid you will have to get used to seeing train stations at AfD.
Trainsandotherthings (
talk) 21:03, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
- If someone contests a bold action, start a formal discussion. If they contest a discussion to merge or redirect as a "stealth deletion" then they're wrong to put it bluntly - you're not proposing deletion and you've (hopefully) advertised the discussion in the appropriate places.
Thryduulf (
talk) 22:45, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
- One of the points in favor of AfD is people are notified far more than with any other method of merger or redirection. I always post notification to
WT:TRAINS when I propose a merge, and unfortunately those discussions are typically ill-attended. I have been accused (by other editors, not you) of "stealth deletion" by boldy redirecting articles, even though I always respect a challenge and follow up by initiating a discussion.
Trainsandotherthings (
talk) 10:26, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Redirect to
Main Line (Long Island Rail Road): not notable by itself.
Owen×
☎ 20:23, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Redirect per nomination.
Trainsandotherthings (
talk) 21:03, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Redirect to either
New Cassel, New York, or
Main Line (Long Island Rail Road)#Stations per nom.
Epicgenius (
talk) 14:52, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
-
Justin English (
|
talk |
history |
protect |
delete |
links |
watch |
logs |
views) – (
View AfD |
edits since nomination)
- (Find sources:
Google (
books ·
news ·
scholar ·
free images ·
WP refs) ·
FENS ·
JSTOR ·
TWL)
This BLP appears to be of a reasonably successful but otherwise ordinary early-career professor. I can't find evidence of any of the
WP:NACADEMIC criteria, nor biographical coverage for
WP:GNG. Citations are
decent (?) but I don't think it's enough for NACADEMIC#1. Note that the "award" listed -- "the NIH Director's New Innovation Award" -- does not satisfy NACADEMIC#2 since it's actually just grant funding, not a personal honor.
~ L 🌸 (
talk) 23:53, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Note: This discussion has been included in the
deletion sorting lists for the following topics:
Academics and educators and
Biology.
~ L 🌸 (
talk) 23:53, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Note: This discussion has been included in the
deletion sorting lists for the following topics:
Medicine,
New York,
North Carolina, and
Utah.
WCQuidditch
☎
✎ 00:05, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Support as per nomination. He seems to have had a decent career so far and maybe will meet the notability criteria in the future, but I have to agree this article doesn't seem to meet
WP:NACADEMIC at present. I noticed, though, that it was a successful AFC submission. It would be good to have the opinion of the editors involved in that process so pinging
Eastmain (
talk ·
contribs) and
Qcne (
talk ·
contribs).
Adam Black
t •
c 00:13, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Thanks for the ping @
Adam Black GB. I felt it was borderline passing
WP:NACADEMIC, and I guess I'm an inclusionist instead of an exclusionist when it comes to borderline articles. Happy to defer to consensus in this case.
Qcne
(talk) 08:06, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Thanks for your work at AfC. For the record I do think it made sense to accept at AfC -- the article writing is solid and it's perfectly plausible that someone at this career stage could be notable (unlike a lot of AfC submissions about grad students/postdocs). I think AfC should lean inclusionist at the borderline. But when I looked at it with my NPP hat on, I felt like it merited a deletion discussion.
~ L 🌸 (
talk) 00:58, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Delete. I added the primary sources tag during New Page Review when I didn't have time to review the citation record but hesitated to bring to AfD since it had just gone through AfC successfully. It is troublesome that so many sources in the piece are to his own writing/lab, including those purporting to evaluate his impact according to the NACADEMIC criteria. Upon further review this evening I agree with the nominator that there is not enough to support notability under GNG, NBIO or NACADEMIC at this time.
Dclemens1971 (
talk) 01:09, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Delete. While quite impressive for an early career researcher, his citations are well below what would be expected of a notable academic in his subfield. 59/80 of his coauthors -- including students and techs, not only professors -- have a higher h-index than he has (8), and for NPROF C1 we would want to see someone who was in at least the top 20% of just the professors/senior researchers. I'm surprised this got through AfC.
JoelleJay (
talk) 02:08, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
- I don't disagree with your conclusion, but that's a...strange rationale. At least, it's oriented towards very hierarchical disciplines. Why should someone have to build a big pool of lesser researchers around themselves in order to become notable? The goal should be to make one's own research as good as possible by working with other people who are as good as possible, and to push one's students to be as successful as possible, preferably even better than oneself. Instead, your criterion would judge people to be most successful when they surround themselves by lesser researchers, when their student coauthors are all failures who never go on to anything, so that those people stand out the most among them. —
David Eppstein (
talk) 04:02, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
- I meant in this specific case I would have needed to see him in the top 20% of his professor coauthors for me to reconsider him for C1. In subfields like his where papers can have many collaborators from diverse career stages and institutions, and for subjects with a clearly low citation profile, it's easier to justify thresholding at particular quintiles. If he had a more edge-case citation profile and was publishing exclusively with coauthors from one or two institutions I would of course incorporate more factors into my evaluation.
JoelleJay (
talk) 00:18, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Delete as
WP:Too soon. Citations not really yet adequate in this highly cited field.
Xxanthippe (
talk) 04:33, 22 May 2024 (UTC).
reply
- Delete. As usual, I am unimpressed by middle author (in a field where that matters) on highly coauthored and only moderately-cited papers. Looks
WP:TOOSOON at best for NPROF. Little other sign of notability.
Russ Woodroofe (
talk) 09:37, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Delete. The comments above citing
WP:Too soon are spot on. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Atlassian (
talk •
contribs) 21:42, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
-
Jeff Ifrah (
|
talk |
history |
protect |
delete |
links |
watch |
logs |
views) – (
View AfD |
edits since nomination)
- (Find sources:
Google (
books ·
news ·
scholar ·
free images ·
WP refs) ·
FENS ·
JSTOR ·
TWL)
This resume is an advert. Besides that, I cannot find any significant coverage about the subject, rather than by the subject. Adjunct professor doesn't count for NPROF, and nor does citations in general media rather than scholarly works for the bibliometric criteria. I cannot identify any other additional criteria that Ifrah may pass.
Alpha3031 (
t •
c) 15:10, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Note: This discussion has been included in the
deletion sorting lists for the following topics:
Businesspeople,
Law, and
New York.
Alpha3031 (
t •
c) 15:10, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Delete this is promotional biography. Sources in articles are name-checks, brief quotes from article subject, interviews, and firm profiles. Google Scholar appears to have nothing of substance and his articles are not widely cited. Agree he doesn't meet NPROF or GNG, and hard to see another guideline that would apply.
Oblivy (
talk) 15:29, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Delete: Very PROMO, the only article about this person is 16. Might have a brief mention in "gambling laws in the USA" or something along those lines, just not enough coverage about the person. Most articles are about the legalities of sports betting, not about this person.
Oaktree b (
talk) 20:02, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Agree #16 is probably SIGCOV. It's a regional newspaper which might reduce its weight but that's just quibbling.
Oblivy (
talk) 01:41, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Delete the analyzed sources do not help to establish fulfilment of WP:ANYBIO or general notability. --
BoraVoro (
talk) 06:23, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
-
D&W Performance (
|
talk |
history |
protect |
delete |
links |
watch |
logs |
views) – (
View AfD |
edits since nomination)
- (Find sources:
Google (
books ·
news ·
scholar ·
free images ·
WP refs) ·
FENS ·
JSTOR ·
TWL)
All of the sources in the article appear to be from the company and I couldn't find anything meaningful about the company in either Google or Google News. It's a near orphan, with the only meaningful link being an unsourced mention in the article for
Auburn, New York, site of its headquarters.
Alansohn (
talk) 16:17, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Note: This discussion has been included in the
deletion sorting lists for the following topics:
Companies,
Transportation, and
New York.
Alansohn (
talk) 16:17, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Delete - Fails GNG and NCORP. Looking for D&W Performance yielded nothing of value. D&W Diesel, which I think is the same company, has more hits but everything that turns up is trivial coverage.
Pahunkat (
talk) 14:42, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
-
List of stamp clubs and philatelic societies in the United States (
|
talk |
history |
protect |
delete |
links |
watch |
logs |
views) – (
View AfD |
edits since nomination)
- (Find sources:
Google (
books ·
news ·
scholar ·
free images ·
WP refs) ·
FENS ·
JSTOR ·
TWL)
Most likely fails
WP:NLIST, consists of 60% red links.
WP:NOTDIRECTORY also applies, and I didn't find
WP:RS describing this list besides third-party directories.
Cocobb8 (💬
talk • ✏️
contribs) 13:23, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
Collapsed list of notified projects for AFD readability
|
- Note: This discussion has been included in the
list of Alabama-related deletion discussions.
CAPTAIN RAJU
(T) 13:45, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Note: This discussion has been included in the
list of Alaska-related deletion discussions.
CAPTAIN RAJU
(T) 13:45, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Note: This discussion has been included in the
list of Arizona-related deletion discussions.
CAPTAIN RAJU
(T) 13:46, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Note: This discussion has been included in the
list of Arkansas-related deletion discussions.
CAPTAIN RAJU
(T) 13:46, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Note: This discussion has been included in the
list of California-related deletion discussions.
CAPTAIN RAJU
(T) 13:53, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Note: This discussion has been included in the
list of Colorado-related deletion discussions.
CAPTAIN RAJU
(T) 13:53, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Note: This discussion has been included in the
list of Connecticut-related deletion discussions.
CAPTAIN RAJU
(T) 13:54, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Note: This discussion has been included in the
list of Delaware-related deletion discussions.
CAPTAIN RAJU
(T) 13:54, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Note: This discussion has been included in the
list of Florida-related deletion discussions.
CAPTAIN RAJU
(T) 13:54, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Note: This discussion has been included in the
list of Georgia (U.S. state)-related deletion discussions.
CAPTAIN RAJU
(T) 13:54, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Note: This discussion has been included in the
list of Hawaii-related deletion discussions.
CAPTAIN RAJU
(T) 13:54, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Note: This discussion has been included in the
list of Idaho-related deletion discussions.
CAPTAIN RAJU
(T) 13:55, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Note: This discussion has been included in the
list of Illinois-related deletion discussions.
CAPTAIN RAJU
(T) 13:55, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Note: This discussion has been included in the
list of Indiana-related deletion discussions.
CAPTAIN RAJU
(T) 13:55, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Note: This discussion has been included in the
list of Iowa-related deletion discussions.
CAPTAIN RAJU
(T) 13:55, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Note: This discussion has been included in the
list of Kansas-related deletion discussions.
CAPTAIN RAJU
(T) 13:55, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Note: This discussion has been included in the
list of Kentucky-related deletion discussions.
CAPTAIN RAJU
(T) 13:55, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Note: This discussion has been included in the
list of Louisiana-related deletion discussions.
CAPTAIN RAJU
(T) 13:55, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Note: This discussion has been included in the
list of Maine-related deletion discussions.
CAPTAIN RAJU
(T) 13:56, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Note: This discussion has been included in the
list of Maryland-related deletion discussions.
CAPTAIN RAJU
(T) 13:56, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Note: This discussion has been included in the
list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions.
CAPTAIN RAJU
(T) 13:56, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Note: This discussion has been included in the
list of Michigan-related deletion discussions.
CAPTAIN RAJU
(T) 13:56, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Note: This discussion has been included in the
list of Mississippi-related deletion discussions.
CAPTAIN RAJU
(T) 13:56, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Note: This discussion has been included in the
list of Missouri-related deletion discussions.
CAPTAIN RAJU
(T) 13:57, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Note: This discussion has been included in the
list of Montana-related deletion discussions.
CAPTAIN RAJU
(T) 13:57, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Note: This discussion has been included in the
list of Nebraska-related deletion discussions.
CAPTAIN RAJU
(T) 13:57, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Note: This discussion has been included in the
list of Nevada-related deletion discussions.
CAPTAIN RAJU
(T) 13:57, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Note: This discussion has been included in the
list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions.
CAPTAIN RAJU
(T) 13:57, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Note: This discussion has been included in the
list of New Hampshire-related deletion discussions.
CAPTAIN RAJU
(T) 13:57, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Note: This discussion has been included in the
list of New Mexico-related deletion discussions.
CAPTAIN RAJU
(T) 13:58, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Note: This discussion has been included in the
list of New York-related deletion discussions.
CAPTAIN RAJU
(T) 13:58, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Note: This discussion has been included in the
list of North Carolina-related deletion discussions.
CAPTAIN RAJU
(T) 13:58, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Note: This discussion has been included in the
list of North Dakota-related deletion discussions.
CAPTAIN RAJU
(T) 13:58, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Note: This discussion has been included in the
list of Ohio-related deletion discussions.
CAPTAIN RAJU
(T) 13:58, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Note: This discussion has been included in the
list of Oklahoma-related deletion discussions.
CAPTAIN RAJU
(T) 13:58, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Note: This discussion has been included in the
list of Oregon-related deletion discussions.
CAPTAIN RAJU
(T) 13:59, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Note: This discussion has been included in the
list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions.
CAPTAIN RAJU
(T) 13:59, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Note: This discussion has been included in the
list of Rhode Island-related deletion discussions.
CAPTAIN RAJU
(T) 13:59, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Note: This discussion has been included in the
list of South Carolina-related deletion discussions.
CAPTAIN RAJU
(T) 13:59, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Note: This discussion has been included in the
list of South Dakota-related deletion discussions.
CAPTAIN RAJU
(T) 13:59, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Note: This discussion has been included in the
list of Tennessee-related deletion discussions.
CAPTAIN RAJU
(T) 14:00, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Note: This discussion has been included in the
list of Texas-related deletion discussions.
CAPTAIN RAJU
(T) 14:00, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Note: This discussion has been included in the
list of Utah-related deletion discussions.
CAPTAIN RAJU
(T) 14:00, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Note: This discussion has been included in the
list of Vermont-related deletion discussions.
CAPTAIN RAJU
(T) 14:00, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Note: This discussion has been included in the
list of Virginia-related deletion discussions.
CAPTAIN RAJU
(T) 14:00, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Note: This discussion has been included in the
list of West Virginia-related deletion discussions.
CAPTAIN RAJU
(T) 14:00, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Note: This discussion has been included in the
list of Wisconsin-related deletion discussions.
CAPTAIN RAJU
(T) 14:01, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Note: This discussion has been included in the
list of Wyoming-related deletion discussions.
CAPTAIN RAJU
(T) 14:01, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
|
- Comment The links I clicked on had no references at all, or none that would count as reliable sources. Didn't check all of them.
Dream Focus 19:45, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Delete. Most of the listed clubs are local organizations which would be unlikely to satisfy the notability criteria of
WP:ORG. Hence, this looks mostly like a directory, which
Wikipedia isn't. --
Metropolitan90
(talk) 23:48, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Speedy keep. This list is self-defining, and does not require extensive documentation. So far around twenty entries are individually notable, and the reasons suggested for deletion are not persuasive: 1) the number of redlinks is irrelevant; there is potential for expansion, and the list would be perfectly valid if the items were not linked, as long as it's possible to verify the existence of items that don't have their own articles; for this, third-party directories are fine. That said, some effort to document them is necessary, but fixing that is part of the normal editing process, not a valid reason for deletion. There is no deadline for locating sources.
- 2) none of the criteria of the cited WP:NOTDIRECTORY apply; this seems to be one of those policies that people cite because it sounds like it would apply, apparently without bothering to read and understand it. Specifically: this is not a "simple listing without contextual information"; the context is clearly given. It is not a list or repository of loosely associated topics; the items on the list are all closely connected by subject matter. It is not a cross-categorization. It has nothing to do with genealogy. It is not a program guide. It is not a business resource. WP:NOTDIRECTORY is about collections of information that have no encyclopedic value for readers; this list clearly has value. "This list is full of redlinks and doesn't have enough sources" is not a valid rationale for deletion. It's a reason to improve the list.
P Aculeius (
talk) 13:32, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
-
P Aculeius, those are all very good points, thanks for pointing them out. However, you have not addressed how this list meets
WP:NLIST, do you think you could explain how it would to justify a speedy keep, as the fact that the entries themselves are notable does not guaranty the list itself being notable? Cheers,
Cocobb8 (💬
talk • ✏️
contribs) 14:44, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
-
John William Goff (baseball) (
|
talk |
history |
protect |
delete |
links |
watch |
logs |
views) – (
View AfD |
edits since nomination)
- (Find sources:
Google (
books ·
news ·
scholar ·
free images ·
WP refs) ·
FENS ·
JSTOR ·
TWL)
I can't find any evidence to substantiate a Major League Baseball player with this name. The article was created back in 2012 by
User:AndyGoff. This appears to be a hoax.
LEPRICAVARK (
talk) 22:46, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
-
John Kelly (NYPD Blue) (
|
talk |
history |
protect |
delete |
links |
watch |
logs |
views) – (
View AfD |
edits since nomination)
- (Find sources:
Google (
books ·
news ·
scholar ·
free images ·
WP refs) ·
FENS ·
JSTOR ·
TWL)
Fails
WP:GNG. Character that was in under 30 episode. Article is all plot. Cant find anything good.
Questions?
four
Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 22:57, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Comment - The problem with that source, and many others in reliable sources I'm finding, is that they aren't about the fictional character as much as they are on the actor and the real-world consequences from his exit from the show. Great sources for
David Caruso's article, but not so great for an article on John Kelly.
This article, from
New York (magazine) and
this one from the NYT were the best two I found so far that actually do talk about the character a bit in addition to the actor, though they still aren't super great in that regard.
Rorshacma (
talk) 05:09, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Coverage of one is coverage of the other. We don't judge why RS'es cover fictional elements, just whether and how they do.
Jclemens (
talk) 03:42, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Coverage of the actor, David Caruso, is not coverage of the fictional character, John Kelly. The article from the LA Times you linked is entirely about the real life actor, David Caruso, and his career. There is no actual information on any fictional elements in it.
Rorshacma (
talk) 04:59, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Merge to
List of NYPD Blue characters - As I still have not found any better coverage of the character, and I don't believe the couple of articles I mentioned above are sufficient to support an independent article, I'm going to go ahead and formally recommend a Merge to the main character list at this point. As the character list currently has no information on the character, just a link to this article, a basic summary of the character should be merged over.
Rorshacma (
talk) 02:04, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Merge if you can properly source it.
Questions?
four
Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 03:50, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
-
Suzanne Pierre (
|
talk |
history |
protect |
delete |
links |
watch |
logs |
views) – (
View AfD |
edits since nomination)
- (Find sources:
Google (
books ·
news ·
scholar ·
free images ·
WP refs) ·
FENS ·
JSTOR ·
TWL)
Doesn't meet
WP:NACADEMIC criteria; for example, publication output with 46 citations in total from 4 documents doesn't suggest significant impact in the field. The 'selected publications' seems to be all publications. There is evidence of grants (one in the form of the award), but none seem to sufficient to meet the prize criteria of
WP:NBIO.
Klbrain (
talk) 16:07, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Note: This discussion has been included in the
deletion sorting lists for the following topics:
Academics and educators,
Women,
Science,
California,
New Jersey, and
New York.
WCQuidditch
☎
✎ 17:15, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Delete. I think that it's far
WP:TOOSOON for NPROF for this 2018 PhD, although the citation record is a reasonable start. The scholarships and grants do not carry much weight for notability, although they may help the subject eventually become notable. Little sign of GNG; I thought there might be some coverage of the national geographic connection, but it looks like this is mostly (only?) another early career award/grant.
Russ Woodroofe (
talk) 10:18, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Delete. SPA-created fanpage. Subject has H-index of 4 on 70 total citations.
128.252.210.4 (
talk) 16:08, 22 May 2024 (UTC).
reply
-
Jon Forshee (
|
talk |
history |
protect |
delete |
links |
watch |
logs |
views) – (
View AfD |
edits since nomination)
- (Find sources:
Google (
books ·
news ·
scholar ·
free images ·
WP refs) ·
FENS ·
JSTOR ·
TWL)
Bio of a composer/academic fails GNG, NBIO, NACADEMIC, NMUSIC. The independent sources do not show
WP:SIGCOV;
WP:BEFORE search turns up no other reliable, independent, secondary sources with significant coverage or evidence of notability under any of the other SNG guidelines that might apply.
Dclemens1971 (
talk) 23:06, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Note: This discussion has been included in the
deletion sorting lists for the following topics:
Academics and educators,
Bands and musicians,
France,
California,
Colorado,
Michigan,
New York, and
Ohio.
WCQuidditch
☎
✎ 00:22, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Delete -- composer/researcher doing good things to advance his career that are pretty typical for composers at this stage. Significantly TOOSOON at this point. On the non-academic side, lacking the awards or major ensembles (those not dedicated to producing student work) to pass notability; on the WP:PROF side, does not have academic appointments or the sort of extensive influence to pass there. (Some of the journals are important in the field, but book/CD reviews are not articles.) --
Michael Scott Asato Cuthbert
(talk) 01:23, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
- These are mostly fair points. Not sure what the "TOOSOON" means--too soon to have a wiki article? Regarding academic appointment, a Google search shows that Forshee was a visiting professor and now instructor. As to the ensembles performing Forshee's compositions, the Callithumpian Consort and Trio Kobayashi are, according to their own websites, not dedicated to performing student works (they list Elliott Carter, Schuittke, Huber, Scelsi, Cage, Lachenmann, Richard Barrett, Jürg Frey, Larry Polansky, James Tenney, basically all widely known composers on the international scene). The articles by Forshee don't appear to be book reviews or CD reviews, but neither do they appear to be rigorous scholarly research articles; they seem to be somewhere in between: interpretive analytical essays? The one in Computer Music Journal is an early review of software by the pioneering computer music composer Trevor Wishart. Part of the motivation for this article is that Forshee is one of the few notable (or borderline notable) students of composer Anthony Davis, who just had his Met Opera premiere of his Malcolm X this season.
Dolemites (
talk) 18:01, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Notability cannot
WP:INHERITED from Anthony Davis or anyone else; for each subject it must be established independently according to the criteria. No articles by Forshee can be used establish his notability, only what independent and reliable sources have to say about him with "significant coverage."
Dclemens1971 (
talk) 03:30, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
78.26 (
spin me /
revolutions) 03:18, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
-
Rusking Pimentel (
|
talk |
history |
protect |
delete |
links |
watch |
logs |
views) – (
View AfD |
edits since nomination)
- (Find sources:
Google (
books ·
news ·
scholar ·
free images ·
WP refs) ·
FENS ·
JSTOR ·
TWL)
As far as I can tell, there's pretty much zero coverage of this person outside of the routine announcements, and NPOL doesn't extend to everybody working in the office of the state level politicans in question.
Alpha3031 (
t •
c) 13:37, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
Keep : I looked into it and found the following new sources which are independent and have significant coverage:
[14],
[15],
[16]. This a notable subject and fulfills the WP:NPOL as well.
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 16:49, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
-
WNXY-LD (
|
talk |
history |
protect |
delete |
links |
watch |
logs |
views) – (
View AfD |
edits since nomination)
- (Find sources:
Google (
books ·
news ·
scholar ·
free images ·
WP refs) ·
FENS ·
JSTOR ·
TWL)
Fails
WP:GNG; just two sources.
Mvcg66b3r (
talk) 13:12, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Note: This discussion has been included in the
deletion sorting lists for the following topics:
Television and
New York.
Mvcg66b3r (
talk) 13:12, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Merge with
WNYX-LD. WNYX seems to have some sources and common ownership that could be enough to not only justify keeping it from AFD, but the perfect article to merge into. --
Danubeball (
talk) 23:32, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 16:50, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
-
Meyer Ryshpan (
|
talk |
history |
protect |
delete |
links |
watch |
logs |
views) – (
View AfD |
edits since nomination)
- (Find sources:
Google (
books ·
news ·
scholar ·
free images ·
WP refs) ·
FENS ·
JSTOR ·
TWL)
Fails
WP:GNG and
WP:NBIO. Sources are user-generated, primary sources or trivial coverage (the phone book??). BEFORE search turns up no other evidence of notability as an artist or generally.
Dclemens1971 (
talk) 00:11, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Delete: Very trivial coverage found
[17]. No listing in the Getty ULAN
[18], the artist hasn't gained critical recognition, with no sourcing in Gscholar found... The person existed, but that's not what we're looking for in a notability guideline.
Oaktree b (
talk) 04:21, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Note: This discussion has been included in the
deletion sorting lists for the following topics:
Artists,
Poland,
Canada,
Connecticut, and
New York.
WCQuidditch
☎
✎ 04:47, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Keep per
WP:HEY. I added three RS to the article. While cleaning up, I deleted all the unsourced and unnecessary material, and re-formatted two references. I think the article should be kept largely due to Ryshpan's regular exhibitions at the Montreal of Museum of Fine Arts, and his entry in A Dictionary of Canadian Artists. There is also non-trivial coverage of his 1958 retrospective. It passes
WP:GNG with at least two reliable sources.
Curiocurio (
talk) 14:19, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
- The article is definitely improved and I thank you for taking that on! but I question the use of MacDonald's dictionary to validate notability. It doesn't appear to be selective but rather inclusive of any artist (the volume Ryshpan is listed is just Canadian artists with last names R-S, that single volume is over 500 pages long, and Ryshpan warrants a single paragraph). Meanwhile, the Montreal Museum of Fine Arts exhibitions were not selective nor were they exclusive to Ryshpan. The spring exhibition was for many decades an exhibition open to all artists and often included 400-500 works (see
page 2 of the source you provided). That leaves a short reference in Ayre's art column, and I frankly disagree that this is enough.
Dclemens1971 (
talk) 15:44, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
- The main point is that three reliable sources are enough to get over
WP:GNG, not
WP:NARTIST.
Curiocurio (
talk) 16:07, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Right, the question is whether a phone-book-length non-selective directory and an exhibition summary for a non-selective, open-to-all art exhibition constitute "significant coverage" for GNG. I'm skeptical.
Dclemens1971 (
talk) 17:04, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
- A Dictionary of Canadian Artists has been completed by the National Gallery of Canada, so it's hardly just a directory.
Curiocurio (
talk) 17:11, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 00:04, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Keep per
WP:HEY - This Montreal painter and engraver has an artistic background that deserves to be known. This biographical summary is well referenced.
Veillg1 (
talk) 15:13, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Does the article clean up and new sources added since its nomination change anyone's opinion about notability here?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 22:27, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Comment: Source 5 is about artworks displayed in a library, I'm still not sure that meets notability requirements. The Canadian artist dictionary is fine, but it's still a small mention.
Oaktree b (
talk) 23:51, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
-
Rusty Fein (
|
talk |
history |
protect |
delete |
links |
watch |
logs |
views) – (
View AfD |
edits since nomination)
- (Find sources:
Google (
books ·
news ·
scholar ·
free images ·
WP refs) ·
FENS ·
JSTOR ·
TWL)
Fails
WP:NSKATE; medal placement at the junior level or bronze/silver medals at the senior-level national championships explicitly do not meet the requirements of
WP:NSKATE. PROD removed.
Bgsu98
(Talk) 02:55, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 04:15, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Note: This discussion has been included in the
list of Skating-related deletion discussions.
Owen×
☎ 12:32, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Delete Moderate success at lower levels but does not meet
WP:GNG guidelines.
Go4thProsper (
talk) 01:53, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Keep - The first source provided above is quite good, especially if you go to C5, where it focuses much more on him. I lean towards discounting the second source above since it mostly talks about his former partner's retirement and him contemplating the same in very few words. It is also the same publication and not independent of source #1 above. However, from the sources in the article, the Skate Today piece seems to cover him specifically in depth. Those are enough to meet GNG vice NSKATE in my view. -
2pou (
talk) 19:42, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 04:39, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
-
Hayley Anne Sacks (
|
talk |
history |
protect |
delete |
links |
watch |
logs |
views) – (
View AfD |
edits since nomination)
- (Find sources:
Google (
books ·
news ·
scholar ·
free images ·
WP refs) ·
FENS ·
JSTOR ·
TWL)
Fails
WP:NSKATE; medal placement at the junior level or bronze/silver medals at the senior-level national championships explicitly do not meet the requirements of
WP:NSKATE. PROD removed.
Bgsu98
(Talk) 02:43, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. Already PROD'd so Soft Deletion is not an option.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 03:48, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
-
MaskedSinger, the nominator PROD'd a lot of these articles, other editors thought it was rash and de-PROD'd them and now they have would up at AFD, all at the same time.
Liz
Read!
Talk! 02:40, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
- ok. thanks for explaining.
MaskedSinger (
talk) 04:02, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 02:38, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
-
Alley of the Dolls (band) (
|
talk |
history |
protect |
delete |
links |
watch |
logs |
views) – (
View AfD |
edits since nomination)
- (Find sources:
Google (
books ·
news ·
scholar ·
free images ·
WP refs) ·
FENS ·
JSTOR ·
TWL)
Newly created article, PROD declined. Sourcing does not establish
WP:GNG being met.
WP:BEFORE brings up only a couple of brief reviews of their EP. –
Muboshgu (
talk) 22:08, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Happy to add additional citations to the EP as many exist
MusicForeverYours (
talk) 01:57, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Added citations to additional reviews, more are available but not always in English as the band has a lot of support in none English speaking countries so reviews are not in English as is requested by Wikipedia.
MusicForeverYours (
talk) 15:26, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previously PROD'd so not eligible for Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 22:11, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Delete: Source 18 is a RS for the album review; the rest used now in the article is primary or non-RS. I can only find the Spill Magazine review, so without any other sources, the band is not at notability.
Oaktree b (
talk) 23:28, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Draftify: If more citations for this article exist, they should absolutely be added. it's
free realist
9 16:31, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Two additional reviews and citations added to establish bands obvious notability. More available but dont want the article to just be a list of magazine reviews. Happy to add more if this view isnt shared.
MusicForeverYours (
talk) 15:48, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 22:11, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
-
Adi Oasis (
|
talk |
history |
protect |
delete |
links |
watch |
logs |
views) – (
View AfD |
edits since nomination)
- (Find sources:
Google (
books ·
news ·
scholar ·
free images ·
WP refs) ·
FENS ·
JSTOR ·
TWL)
Article has been moved disruptively by the creator that has COI without improvements since last decline, so I am taking this to AfD. I cannot tell whether this passes notability, but as I can tell from the comments of the reviewers. Before search shows primarily stories on her releasing songs and albums, and sources listed are rather mostly interviews and videos.
Toadette
Edit! 15:21, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Extraordinary Writ (
talk) 23:10, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 22:36, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
-
Lya Stern (
|
talk |
history |
protect |
delete |
links |
watch |
logs |
views) – (
View AfD |
edits since nomination)
- (Find sources:
Google (
books ·
news ·
scholar ·
free images ·
WP refs) ·
FENS ·
JSTOR ·
TWL)
This article is mainly a resume. Most of the sources in the article consist of dead links from websites that are related to Lya Stern; the rest of the sources either have brief mentions of her or don't mention her at all. After doing a Google search to see if there were sources that could be added to the article, the only significant coverage I found of her was from a website that listed Wikipedia as a source. The rest of the information I found was from her YouTube channel and mentions of her from her students. As a result, she doesn't met
WP:GNG or
WP:NBLP.
That Tired Tarantula
Burrow 20:13, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Note: This discussion has been included in the
deletion sorting lists for the following topics:
Bands and musicians,
Women,
Romania, and
United States of America.
Shellwood (
talk) 20:15, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Note: This discussion has been included in the
deletion sorting lists for the following topics:
Academics and educators,
Authors,
California,
New York, and
Washington, D.C..
WCQuidditch
☎
✎ 22:08, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Comment
One source via Newspapers.com goes into some depth.
Hameltion (
talk |
contribs) 03:55, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Delete (Weak) - There is a big gap in WP on instrumental performers who have created the American musical/movie music scene, and in general the encyclopedia is too quick to delete (especially for women and minority performers), but here I think the AfD is correct. The Baltimore Sun article gives a bit of notability, but the other sources do not. A blurb on the back of one's teacher's independently published book is not enough. There needs to be more and I could not find anything that led to more than what a local performing teacher would have. Glad to be proven wrong. --
Michael Scott Asato Cuthbert
(talk) 08:13, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
Keep as there is a staff written bio at AllMusic
here and an album review
here to go with the detailed Baltimore Sun article linked earlier by Hameltion. Haven't done a full search yet, imv
Atlantic306 (
talk) 23:31, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
- What does Eudice Shapiro have to do with the subject of this article?
That Tired Tarantula
Burrow 23:32, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 22:50, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Just agreeing with That Tired Tarantula above -- @Atlantic306 you have linked to reviews for a different musician. If Lya Stern had an Allmusic staff bio, that would be relevant, but I could not find one. --
Michael Scott Asato Cuthbert
(talk) 01:37, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Sorry about that, have struck my vote and comment. In my defence the erroneous AllMusic bio is the first reference in the article but I should have noticed, imv
Atlantic306 (
talk) 22:11, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
-
Lovari (musician) (
|
talk |
history |
protect |
delete |
links |
watch |
logs |
views) – (
View AfD |
edits since nomination)
- (Find sources:
Google (
books ·
news ·
scholar ·
free images ·
WP refs) ·
FENS ·
JSTOR ·
TWL)
Doesn't seem to have any notable or significant credits.
JDDJS (
talk to me •
see what I've done) 03:19, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
- References for Lovari on Wheel Of Fortune (2023):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bV8rMTIQ2C0
-
https://bobbymgsk.wordpress.com/2023/02/01/wheel-of-fortune-1-31-23/
- References for Lovari on Judge Jerry Springer (2022):
-
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U78Iy9fFQkc
-
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt25965282/releaseinfo/
-
https://followmy.tv/episodes/2487792/judge-jerry/3x104/103
- References for Lovari on Match Game (2019):
-
https://tvseriesfinale.com/tv-show/match-game-season-four-viewer-votes/
-
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt5672484/characters/nm2102281
- References for Lovari in The Barn 2 (2022):
-
https://dailydead.com/horror-highlights-8-found-dead-the-harbinger-the-barn-part-ii/
-
https://hellhorror.com/movies/the-barn-part-ii-movie-7804.html
-
https://podcasts.apple.com/es/podcast/trhs-random-chat-with-lovari/id1539578136?i=1000641962062
-
https://getoutmag.com/lovari-5/
98.109.154.93 (
talk) 04:47, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 04:06, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Desertarun (
talk) 16:07, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
- I added filmography and television appearances of the subject that reflect current dates through May 2024.
170.212.0.95 (
talk) 19:39, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
-
Nuyorican rap (
|
talk |
history |
protect |
delete |
links |
watch |
logs |
views) – (
View AfD |
edits since nomination)
- (Find sources:
Google (
books ·
news ·
scholar ·
free images ·
WP refs) ·
FENS ·
JSTOR ·
TWL)
I couldn't find sources to show it meets
WP:N. Unreferenced so I am not proposing a merge, though a redirect is a possible
WP:ATD.
Boleyn (
talk) 18:55, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 23:22, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Comment The article on Nuyorican rap should be considered carefully before nomination for deletion, as it addresses a unique and influential subset of hip hop culture. However, the decision should also weigh the availability of verifiable sources and the overall notability of the subject as per Wikipedia’s guidelines. --
Improvised but so real unicorn (
talk) 10:22, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Comment Didn’t want to substantially rewrite what is here, since that’s a big change, but the added sources and the general coverage of the issue indicate that “Nuyorican rap” is interchangeable with “Nuyorican hip-hop.” This might be worth noticing in the body of the article, and is definitely worth keeping in mind when looking for other sources to continue improving this article. “Nuyorican rap” didn’t return as many solid sources as “Nuyorican hip-hop,” possibly due to the fact that the apex of the genre was the late 90’s, early ‘00’s, when hip-hop was a more commonly used term.
Ruth Bader Yinzburg (
talk)
- Redirect to
Nuyorican. The refs aren't here to support the article.
Desertarun (
talk) 21:45, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting no consensus yet.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 22:49, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist. I see no consensus here, even on a Redirect target.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 21:29, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
Proposed deletions
Templates