This is a collection of discussions on the deletion of articles related to Motorsport. It is one of many
deletion lists coordinated by
WikiProject Deletion sorting. Anyone can help maintain the list on this page.
Adding a new AfD discussion
Adding an AfD to this page does not add it to the main page at
WP:AFD. Similarly, removing an AfD from this page does not remove it from the main page at
WP:AFD. If you want to nominate an article for deletion, go through the process on that page before adding it to this page. To add a discussion to this page, follow these steps:
Edit this page and add {{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PageName}} to the top of the list. Replace "PageName" with the relevant article name, i.e. the one on the existing AFD discussion. Also, indicate the title of the article in the edit summary as it is particularly helpful to add a link to the article in the edit summary. When you save the page, the discussion will automatically appear.
You should also tag the AfD by adding {{subst:delsort|Motorsport|~~~~}} to it, which will inform editors that it has been listed here. You may place this tag above or below the nomination statement or at the end of the discussion thread.
Closed AfD discussions are automatically removed by
a bot.
Other types of discussions
You can also add and remove other discussions (
prod,
CfD,
TfD etc.) related to Motorsport. For the other XfD's, the process is the same as AfD (except {{Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/PageName}} is used for MFD and {{transclude xfd}} for the rest). For PRODs, adding a link with {{prodded}} will suffice.
Further information
For further information see Wikipedia's
deletion policy and
WP:AfD for general information about Articles for Deletion, including a list of article deletions sorted by day of nomination.
This list is also part of the larger list of deletion debates related to
Sports.
Archived discussions (starting from September 2007) may be found at:
Having checked through per
WP:BEFORE, significant coverages (
WP:SIGCOV) are rather poor for most 2nd and below tier formula classes given the reason for this nominations. Sources consists of almost entirely of
WP:PRIMARY. Additionally, Wikipedia is not a sportsheet for the most ardent of fans (
WP:NOTSTATS), whom anything less than first tier formula classes appeals to.
WP:AFD will be a redirect or merge to
2024 FIA Formula 3 Championship (edit) and
2024 FIA Formula 2 Championship.
I am also nominating the following related pages for this same reason with more to be added in:
Formula One is the top tier of the sport and one of the (if not the single) most prestigious category in motorsport as a whole. The F1 equivalent pages to the ones included in this nomination,
using this article as an example, contain little more additional information. Reading
WP:NOTSTATS, the only thing these pages are missing is a little more summarised information. The nominated pages display the information in clear, concise tables and they provide information that is not available in the main season articles (
2024 Formula 2 Championship and
2024 FIA Formula 3 Championship) and add context to the relevant motorsport championship.
Keep all - It's standard practice to routinely split out individual races from their parent (season) article. This keeps the parent article (in this case
2024 FIA Formula 3 Championship) readable. Your suggestion to merge, while also being a full admittance that there is notable content here, would cause the parent article to be far too cluttered.
WP:SIZESPLIT and
WP:NOMERGE once again apply here. "...whom anything less than first tier formula classes appeals to." That is your personal opinion and one which quite obviously has a lot of disagreement. ―"Ghost of Dan Gurney" (talk)23:21, 30 June 2024 (UTC)reply
I wouldn't have minded them to exist if reliable third party sources exists to back them up, but no, we get sources consisting of mainly
WP:PRIMARY or nothing and do we need an
WP:INDISCRIMINATE amount of sports results to clutter Wikipedia with, especially those the most ardent minority of nerds bother with. There's always a home for them in Fandom. Nothing wrong with that site, though. People should think before shoving junk into Wikipedia.
SpacedFarmer (
talk)
14:05, 1 July 2024 (UTC)reply
But you're not understanding that these are not standalone articles; their notability is established through sources which exist in the main article including Formula Scout and Autosport. The personal aspects of your rationale also really needs to stop, posthaste. Personal attacks like calling people "nerds" and calling their efforts "junk" are part of what got you sent to ANI before. ―"Ghost of Dan Gurney" (talk)15:19, 1 July 2024 (UTC)reply
Keep per above discussion. These are not standalone articles — if you nominate these few you should go all the way back to
2004 and list all rounds of previous F3000, GP2, Formula 2, GP3 and Formula 3 seasons. But as much as some lack sufficient prose, all are notable individually and
WP:SECONDARY coverage exists. Nominator also gets a
WP:TROUT for their uncivil comments.
MSport1005 (
talk)
18:09, 1 July 2024 (UTC)reply
"But as much as some lack sufficient prose..." I noticed that
2024 FIA Formula 3 Championship does have summaries of the races in its prose, in line with the above-quoted section of
WP:NOTSTATS which I opine supports our keep !votes. This is the exact standard which I believe we strive for on Wikipedia as a whole;
SUMMARY-style prose in the main article, stats tables split out into their own sub-articles. ―"Ghost of Dan Gurney" (talk)18:21, 1 July 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete per nom, 5225C. Other than Macau GP, most individual 2nd tier or below races are not notable, especially those sanctioned by the FIA. Most people but the most ardent fans don't pay attention to it too and don't remember who wom either, including Macau.
SpacedFarmer (
talk)
20:33, 29 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Proposed deletions
Comment on the talk pages of the articles, not here.