The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
That category is nominated
right here. Please provide your input (pro/con/other) at the correct nomination. -
RevelationDirect (
talk) 01:22, 3 June 2023 (UTC)reply
Delete as
WP:OCVENUE. The existence of categories for Olympic venues does not justify the existence of this category, as per
WP:OSE.
Joseph2302 (
talk) 11:12, 1 June 2023 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Flanders Campaign 1793–94
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
C. RemoveCategory:History of Flanders: inadequate for this article; just because British historians have termed it "Flanders campaign" doesn't mean Flanders as a county was particularly relevant here, only as part of the larger Austrian Netherlands.
My point #1 (see talk page) was that Austrian Netherlands is too narrow for the scope of the subject, and that the Dutch Republic, the Prince-Bishopric of Liège and all the other smaller semi-independent polities in the south should be included as they were interlinked.
We obviously do not agree with each other on keeping this in the tree of the
Austrian Netherlands. The Austrian Netherlands had not ceased to exist during this war, it only ceased to exist as a result of (hence at the conclusion of) the war.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 15:52, 31 March 2023 (UTC)reply
Comment — would the contributors please fix the indentation and signing of their contributions? I'm finding this incomprehensible. If you have 3 subcategory rename suggestions, numbering them would help, but better to not make them look like nominations. William Allen Simpson (
talk) 07:31, 8 April 2023 (UTC)reply
I've tried to fix it, I hope this helps. Cheers,
Nederlandse Leeuw (
talk) 23:21, 8 April 2023 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Izno (
talk) 19:02, 31 May 2023 (UTC)reply
Comment Still confused as to what exactly it is that we're being asked to approve. Can we get a single statement please of all the asks?
Laurel Lodged (
talk) 07:40, 2 June 2023 (UTC)reply
@
Laurel Lodged: the main question is, should we have a combined category for the French conquest of the low lands because it was one war theatre, or should we have two separate categories because it concerns two different countries. As appears at the end of the discussion, it does not matter a lot because we can have two country subcategories of one war theatre parent category, so we are already close to consensus. The only real question left, not for now, perhaps for a different discussion, is if this theatre category is arbitrarily defined.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 12:03, 2 June 2023 (UTC)reply
I see that Srnec has just turned the former main page name into a disamb:
Flanders campaign.
Support the above 3 initiatives. However, I must frown on those changes that were made while this discussion was still underway.
Laurel Lodged (
talk) 08:04, 8 June 2023 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Ted Lasso
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:delete.
✗plicit 06:51, 20 June 2023 (UTC)reply
Nominator's rationale: Too little content, redundant to the episodes cat. Nothing seems to need to be recategorized or merged. ―
Justin (koavf)❤
T☮
C☺
M☯ 18:07, 31 May 2023 (UTC)reply
Comment:
Bill Lawrence (TV producer) is not a Ted Lasso episode, so something would need to be recategorized or merged. What exactly is being proposed here? –
Jonesey95 (
talk) 18:17, 31 May 2023 (UTC)reply
Delete per
WP:OCEPON. The above comments seem to assume that this is a merge proposal, but that is not the case.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 19:37, 31 May 2023 (UTC)reply
@
Marcocapelle I did not assume anything. The nominator says redundant to the episodes cat. I've listed 3 pages that don't belong there, hence why this category isn't redundant. Also, please let us know how
WP:OCEPON relates to this? The "Ted Lasso" in the category name isn't a person (or fictional character) but the name of the television series. Did you mean to link to something else?
Gonnym (
talk) 13:32, 1 June 2023 (UTC)reply
Oppose this seems like a perfectly valid parent cat, of which the episodes cat can be a child. I do question if Bill Lawrence needs to included in this, but the main article and the awards list are good. -
Favre1fan93 (
talk) 15:29, 1 June 2023 (UTC)reply
Delete. Needs more than just the episodes subcat and a list. The episodes subcat can certainly survive as a standalone without the need for an eponymous parent category. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 21:34, 1 June 2023 (UTC)reply
Delete for Now Per
WP:SMALLCAT since it contains only the subcategory and 2 articles. (There is currently a miscategorized third article,
Bill Lawrence (TV producer), but that's a clear
WP:PERFCAT issue.) If/when this gets up to 5+ legitimate direct articles, no objection to recreating. -
RevelationDirect (
talk) 01:26, 3 June 2023 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Cemeteries in Chowan County, North Carolina
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:dual merge as stated in discussion.
(non-admin closure) (
t ·
c) buidhe 02:41, 8 June 2023 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: This type of category is not used for that many other football leagues with promotion and relegation. Status of if clubs are playing or have played in the league is better conveyed in articles
English Football League and
List of former English Football League clubs.
Note: This discussion has been included in
WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page discussions.
GiantSnowman 18:18, 31 May 2023 (UTC)reply
Merge and delete per WT:FOOTBALL discussion.
GiantSnowman 18:19, 31 May 2023 (UTC)reply
Merge As appropriate, clubs have categories for year of disestablishment and this would serve the same function. (I would also support future nominations with Teterev53's examples.) -
RevelationDirect (
talk) 01:42, 3 June 2023 (UTC)reply
You don't understand. That categories are not for defunct (disestablished) clubs. They are categorized by former league of club, and many active clubs in it.
Teterev53 (
talk) 23:14, 4 June 2023 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:St Fintan's High School
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Under-23 cricket teams
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:delete.
✗plicit 06:48, 20 June 2023 (UTC)reply
Nominator's rationale: Teams category is a
WP:SMALLCAT and if deleted, the parent will be empty and redundant. the only under-23 cricket team articles we have are for
Bangladesh and
NZ, and as under-23 cricket is not a common age range for cricket events, unlikely more articles will be created for under-23 teams.
Joseph2302 (
talk) 11:21, 31 May 2023 (UTC)reply
Delete for Now with no objection to recreating if 5+ articles ever appear. -
RevelationDirect (
talk) 02:13, 3 June 2023 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Youth cricket in the United States
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:merge.
✗plicit 06:53, 20 June 2023 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale:WP:SMALLCAT - one eponymous article. would have nominated as a speedy C2F but there's a subcategory, also nominated for deletion.
- car chasm (
talk) 01:36, 31 May 2023 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Misanthropists
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Delete If widely used, this would raise BLP issues. -
RevelationDirect (
talk) 02:15, 3 June 2023 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.