The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Among editors who do not appear to have a conflict of interest, there is consensus that the notability requirements aren't met. Sandstein 07:27, 18 July 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete by all means as unfortunately there is no good coverage, not even in the least, and my searches (News, Books, highbeam and thefreelibrary) confirmed this.
SwisterTwistertalk 05:34, 1 July 2015 (UTC)reply
Keep because information from an interview has been added since the article's nomination for deletion. This interview is not self-published, as it was written by an individual unassociated with Tryad. Because of this, at least one source that satisfies WP:GNG exists.
Muffins94 (
talk) 20:46, 2 July 2015 (UTC) Note: User:Mffins94 is the creator of this article.reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
JAaron95 (
Talk) 12:09, 3 July 2015 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
JAaron95Talk 13:58, 10 July 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete Article fails to satisfy
WP:GNG and
WP:NMUSIC. One non-self published source does not satisfy
WP:NMUSIC as there needs to be "multiple, non-trivial, published works appearing in sources that are reliable, not self-published, and are independent of the musician or ensemble itself." Also note that
WP:GNG uses the word "sources" meaning more than one is required. Googling the band returns no results that are non-trivial and the article creator has unfortunately come to the same conclusion.
Wugapodes (
talk) 06:39, 11 July 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete and then redirect to
triad (as in the 1st AFD, as a common alternate spelling). Independent notability has not been established; sources given are blogs or affiliated with the subject. —
Lowellian (
reply) 00:45, 13 July 2015 (UTC)reply
Keep Added two notable news articles regarding the Tryad Apple iTunes LP release and a second interview.
Avavrek (
talk) 03:24, 13 July 2015 (UTC) —
Avavrek (
talk •
contribs) has made
few or no other edits outside this topic. Note There is a member of this band named Andrew Vavrek.reply
Keep (as original nominator): Three reliable sources are present now; "substantial coverage" is debatable, but the article seems fair and factual, and the project is still active, so can gain more notoriety in the future. --
intgr[talk] 10:11, 14 July 2015 (UTC)reply
What three sources do you consider reliable? Please clarify, because as
User:Kraxler points out below, I'm not seeing even one reliable source here, much less three. —
Lowellian (
reply) 05:45, 18 July 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete contrary to the statement here above, there seem to be no reliable sources independent of the subject (please say which ones you consider RS), all sources in the article are primary, self-publiushed, or blogs, perhaps except the Ars Technica ref which has a trivial mention of Tryad, only. Fails
WP:NMUSIC and
WP:GNG.
Kraxler (
talk) 16:57, 17 July 2015 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.