The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ~ Amory(
u •
t •
c) 23:48, 17 April 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete no significant coverage that would qualify for the primary criteria of
WP:NORG. Article appears to be completely promotional and created by an SPA, too. Levivich 14:38, 12 April 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete Promotional, unrefrenced article for which I see no sort of sourcing which could be added which would help it meet the criteria of NCORP. Best,
Barkeep49 (
talk) 12:07, 13 April 2019 (UTC)reply
Note: This discussion has been included in
WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions.
GiantSnowman 10:36, 15 April 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete - pure promotion, no evidence of notability.
GiantSnowman 10:39, 15 April 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete Agree this is a G11.
Govvy (
talk) 09:43, 16 April 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete per above. G11 Applies
Rollidan (
talk) 23:06, 16 April 2019 (UTC)reply
Speedy delete as per above GS11. --Jimbo[online] 13:23, 17 April 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.