The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete.
Michig (
talk) 14:19, 26 July 2014 (UTC)reply
Keep. It may be a niche sport, but it has some sources and some of the YouTube videos have a lot of hits.
Frmorrison (
talk) 15:53, 11 July 2014 (UTC)reply
I'd like to see some of those sources, as YouTube videos are not considered reliable sources.
Narutolovehinata5tccsdnew 03:54, 12 July 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete - wholly non-notable.
GiantSnowman 09:28, 12 July 2014 (UTC)reply
Comment Found an article in the
Qatar Tribune, a one line mention in
Wellington Times under the name "bubble soccer", a passing paragraph in a NZ newspaper
at Stuff.co.nz and a page on a radio station website about the abovementioned youtube video
Keyj.
JTdaleTalk 16:10, 12 July 2014 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –
Davey2010 •
(talk) 14:01, 19 July 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete - As the article effectively concedes, no global or even national oversight body exists. The events appear to be sporadic, scattered get-togethers that do not give rise to
notability, at least at this time. YouTube videos typically do not qualify as authoritative or
reliable sources.--
Rpclod (
talk) 15:03, 20 July 2014 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.