The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Semi-pro team with poor sourcing, doesn't appear to meet
WP:FOOTY.
Mosmof (
talk) 14:38, 11 January 2015 (UTC)reply
Note: This discussion has been included in
WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions.
• Gene93k (
talk) 00:34, 13 January 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete – Young fourth-tier team that has not yet qualified for the
Lamar Hunt U.S. Open Cup, therefore fails
WP:FOOTYN. No third-party references cited, and no other evidence of meeting
WP:GNG. Definitely
WP:TOOSOON. —
Jkudlicktcs 04:21, 13 January 2015 (UTC); Changing my !vote to Redirect to
National Premier Soccer League based upon GiantSnowman's reasoning below. Once independent notability is reached, the article can be recreated. —
Jkudlicktcs 02:15, 17 January 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete - Amateur team that has not competed in the national stages of a national cup competition. No indication of any other achievements receiving sufficient significant coverage to satisfy GNG.
Fenix down (
talk) 15:52, 14 January 2015 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
NORTH AMERICA1000 20:23, 18 January 2015 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.