The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 11:18, 13 April 2018 (UTC)reply
Keep the more comprehensive French Wikipedia article
here has references that demonstrate notability and that article can be used to improve the English version
Atlantic306 (
talk) 19:04, 30 March 2018 (UTC)reply
None of the sources used in the French Wikipedia article pass the
GNG. KingAndGod 19:51, 30 March 2018 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, --
RoySmith(talk) 19:44, 4 April 2018 (UTC)reply
Weak delete. While not an area I am familiar with, given this is a poorly attended AFD and I read French, I took a look at the sourcing in the French wikipedia article. Two of the sources wouldn't load for me, but otherwise *collectively* they didn't pass our en.wp standards for an article. I wouldn't go as far as KingAndGod and say *none* of the sources are relevant to GNG, but taken collectively we do need multiple reliable independent sources that are more than passing mentions and I am not seeing that.
Martinp (
talk) 19:19, 12 April 2018 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.