The result was delete. Ron Ritzman ( talk) 00:04, 18 May 2012 (UTC) reply
Unsourced BLP about a boxer who fails WP:NSPORTS#Boxing. He's had no world title fights and has never been ranked in the top 10 (current Boxrec rank is 31st in his division). Papaursa ( talk) 23:36, 10 May 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was keep Dipankan ( Have a chat?) 15:08, 17 May 2012 (UTC) ( non-admin closure) reply
There is nothing that shows this is a notable martial art or that it meets any of the criteria at WP:MANOTE. None of the sources show notability and claims of dating back 3000 years are unsourced. Papaursa ( talk) 23:24, 10 May 2012 (UTC) reply
{{
cite web}}
: External link in |publisher=
(
help); Italic or bold markup not allowed in: |publisher=
(
help){{
cite web}}
: External link in |publisher=
(
help); Italic or bold markup not allowed in: |publisher=
(
help){{
cite web}}
: External link in |publisher=
(
help); Italic or bold markup not allowed in: |publisher=
(
help){{
cite web}}
: External link in |publisher=
(
help)http://exploresrilanka.lk/2010/07/angampora-the-martial-art-of-sri-lankan-kings/ BernardZ ( talk) 13:44, 14 May 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. JohnCD ( talk) 09:36, 18 May 2012 (UTC) reply
I do not think these awards actually make for notability--I think it is sales manager of the year for kitchen products in Sweden. DGG ( talk ) 23:24, 10 May 2012 (UTC) reply
The award was not in Sweden at all; it was available for several years as a national award in the United Kingdom.
A photo of the award: http://i47.tinypic.com/2prgy8h.jpg — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.24.54.16 ( talk) 07:50, 12 May 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. JohnCD ( talk) 09:38, 18 May 2012 (UTC) reply
Not so notable character of a not-so-notable Indian Tv show. No references establishing notability of character. Also fails WP:GNG §§ AnimeshKulkarni ( talk) 09:52, 30 April 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy keep. obvious bad faith nomination. DGG ( talk ) 00:16, 12 May 2012 (UTC) reply
For courtesy, a point out that these two nominations are being discussed at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#WP:POINTy nominations of ANTM articles, though we could use some sensible discussion about this (I am not willing to be dragged into the MMA discussion at all). Nate • ( chatter) 23:23, 11 May 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy keep. obvious bad faith nomination. DGG ( talk ) 00:17, 12 May 2012 (UTC) reply
The enduring notability WP:NOTABLE is undetermined for this reality television contest, as a result it fails virtually all criteria for WP:NOTNEWSPAPER. This page seems to be little more than a promotional tool for the show and a personal agenda for fans. This is not a America's Next Top Model fan page. There are no reliable sources WP:IRS to show the validity of this "contest". Mississippistfan ( talk) 14:40, 10 May 2012 (UTC) reply
For courtesy, a point out that these two nominations are being discussed at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#WP:POINTy nominations of ANTM articles, though we could use some sensible discussion about this (I am not willing to be dragged into the MMA discussion at all). Nate • ( chatter) 23:23, 11 May 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was Kept, no consensus. A merge may be appropriate but this can be done outside AFD. JYolkowski // talk 01:00, 19 May 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman ( talk) 00:04, 18 May 2012 (UTC) reply
Article about footballer who is mentioned in a few obituaries - seemingly only notable as a reserve goalkeeper for Honvéd. Doesn't appear to be the subject of significant coverage in reliable sources (all obits I found are derivative of one published in the Nezmeti Sport) and I cannot verify that he played in a fully-pro league. PROD was contested by the article's creator without explanation. Jogurney ( talk) 22:28, 10 May 2012 (UTC) reply
What's wrong with someone having both an English and Hungarian entry? Ifore2012 ( talk) 15:27, 11 May 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. Dipankan ( Have a chat?) 04:05, 17 May 2012 (UTC) ( non-admin closure) reply
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Santhosh Pandit (4th nomination)
Proposes deletion as per WP:BLP1E. Biography of a living person. Subject notable only for one event.
An extract of the policy:
Wikipedia is not news, or an indiscriminate collection of information. Being in the news does not in itself mean that someone should be the subject of a Wikipedia article. We should generally avoid having an article on a person when each of three conditions is met:
The subject was in news just for only one event: an amateur film he made all by himself (acted, directed, written, ...), and which he screened in just one rented theater. And it was in news not for its quality but for its notoriety, for the infamy it earned, for the peculiar way such a bad product was received (with the viewers celebrating with oaths and abusive language). So even if we should have this 'great' incident recorded in the 'history' of cinema, then we could merge this article into Krishnanum Radhayum the article on the only film he made and which was the only reason of his appearance in news for a few months. Even for the most technical of the reasons, this article is not qualified to exist, since the subject was in news only for a single event (and of-course for its reverberations for a few more months).
And please note that there is no difference of opinion with the quality of the article. It is indeed well written. The problem is with the notability of the subject. That the subject was notable for only one event which has now lost its news value. Please do focus on WP:BLP1E in the discussion.
Austria156 ( talk) 22:03, 10 May 2012 (UTC) reply
I urge very strongly to keep the article and even not to entertain yet another request for deletion in the future regardless of how flamboyant or exuberant Santhosh Pandit may continue to show up in the public life of Kerala. As a person of article, he has already earned enough to be in the pages of Wikipedia by now. Remember, Wikipedia is not a pulp newspaper that keeps deleting or 'forgetting' articles as someone just feels like. ViswaPrabhaവിശ്വപ്രഭ talk 06:10, 11 May 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. JohnCD ( talk) 22:06, 17 May 2012 (UTC) reply
The title is unrelated to the subject body. Furthermore, the content is already has a WP page, if the author wanted, he can simply improve on it. Kinkreet ~♥moshi moshi♥~ 21:44, 10 May 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. JohnCD ( talk) 22:04, 17 May 2012 (UTC) reply
Not yet notable per WP:NSPORT or WP:NMMA. All references are for amateur matches, and I can't find any evidence online that he's appeared in anything higher than what's referenced in the article. Proposed deletion contested by page's creator. Scopecreep ( talk) 21:33, 10 May 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. No evidence of notability presented under any guideline or policy, WP:GNG or otherwise. joe decker talk to me 20:12, 17 May 2012 (UTC) reply
Previous Prod with rationale "No evidence that this bachelor's degree dissertation has any encyclopaedic notability." Prod removed by article creator so bringing it to AfD on the same rationale. AllyD ( talk) 21:31, 10 May 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. Ron Ritzman ( talk) 01:25, 17 May 2012 (UTC) reply
Fails WP: GNG / WP:NFOOTY. No national team play in the olympics or WC according to provided sources. I can find none through research either. Newmanoconnor ( talk) 21:08, 10 May 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. JohnCD ( talk) 22:07, 17 May 2012 (UTC) reply
Couldn't find any RS, hard to use google since that generic name. mabdul 21:06, 10 May 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. Dipankan ( Have a chat?) 04:07, 17 May 2012 (UTC) ( non-admin closure) reply
Seems to be more advertising than attributable facts Lithopsian ( talk) 20:47, 10 May 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. No more arguments for deletion. Ron Ritzman ( talk) 01:27, 17 May 2012 (UTC) reply
Non notable UK Prep School. No references to indicate notability. Does not pass WP:GNG
First4Uppingham (
talk)
20:33, 10 May 2012 (UTC)—
First4Uppingham (
talk •
contribs) has made
few or no other edits outside this topic.
reply
The result was speedy keep as part of a pattern of intentionally disruptive AFD nominations and contributions. First4Uppingham ( talk · contribs), ZachFoutre ( talk · contribs), and 213.246.93.122 ( talk · contribs) are clearly one and the same person, and the contributions history gave the game away. Uncle G ( talk) 14:22, 11 May 2012 (UTC) reply
Reason: Non notable UK primary school. Does not pass WP:GNG First4Uppingham ( talk) 20:21, 10 May 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was merge to Aaron Rodgers. Ron Ritzman ( talk) 00:09, 18 May 2012 (UTC) reply
non notable/ hoax day author removed PROD Lerdthenerd wiki defender 20:28, 10 May 2012 (UTC) reply
This page has been blanked as a courtesy. |
<--
The result was nothing really/invalid nomination, since this is not a deletion request. Merging doesn't require administrative intervention, and it doesn't seem anyone objects, so that's at normal editorial discretion. Seraphimblade Talk to me 08:23, 31 May 2012 (UTC) reply
I doubt that this notable to get it's enough article, maybe merge it to XBRL. mabdul 19:57, 10 May 2012 (UTC) reply
-->
The result was delete. JohnCD ( talk) 19:53, 17 May 2012 (UTC) reply
No assertion of notability per WP:ENTERTAINER or WP:PORNBIO; no significant coverage online from WP:Reliable sources. Proposed deletion contested without comment by page's creator. Scopecreep ( talk) 19:06, 10 May 2012 (UTC) reply
BO; talk 00:22, 14 May 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy delete. Speedy delete via A7, organization with no plausible claim to importance. (at the moment, according to the article, it has only one member) DGG ( talk ) 00:28, 12 May 2012 (UTC) reply
Minor newly started organization, not notable. Note this is a different Alpha Xi Omega (This one is in the Philippines) than the one in the first nomination.
The result was delete. JohnCD ( talk) 19:50, 17 May 2012 (UTC) reply
Fails WP:GNG and It should be redirected or deleted Yash t 101 02:34, 25 April 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman ( talk) 00:10, 18 May 2012 (UTC) reply
Not notable failing WP:BAND. Four references that are a combination of trivial and self-published QU TalkQu 08:16, 2 May 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman ( talk) 00:10, 18 May 2012 (UTC) reply
I couldn't find enough coverage in reliable sources to prove that Quense passes Wikipedia's notability guidelines for biographies. The NorthJersey.com source in the article was the best I could find. The article was deleted at AfD in 2008, but I'm not sure if the article is sufficiently similar to the old one to be able to delete it under CSD G4, or whether any new sources have appeared since then. — Mr. Stradivarius ♫ 18:40, 2 May 2012 (UTC) reply
I see he is now listed on Amazon (per the deletion discussion in 2008) but I do not know if that is enough to meet notability. The page also has a leans towards advertisement language in reference to his classes/writing seminars. I would second deletion. DietFoodstamp ( talk) 22:26, 2 May 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman ( talk) 00:11, 18 May 2012 (UTC) reply
Non-notable student publication. No secondary sources supporting its notability independent from the University. Appears to be defunct (its website has lapsed hosting). Axem Titanium ( talk) 07:34, 24 April 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. JohnCD ( talk) 19:57, 17 May 2012 (UTC) reply
Fails WP:N and WP:RS. School has around 70 students, not many. Tomtomn00 ( talk • contributions) 17:10, 10 May 2012 (UTC) reply
comment - I don't think the number of students has a bearing on notability. I can't see that in WP:WPSCH/AG#N. Is there another policy that speaks to that? Wikipelli Talk 21:39, 10 May 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Unsourced BLP Ron Ritzman ( talk) 00:12, 18 May 2012 (UTC) reply
This individual does not meet the criteria Wikipedia requires to establish notability. In the two references provided, he is just mentioned in photo captions. There are 160 unique Ghits [7], but the coverage is minimal (ie, just his name in address directories) and the sources are not reliable and independent (facebook, LinkedIn, blogs, etc.) The single hit in Google news archives is about car accident he was in. Also, the claim he is notable rests on his past presidency of the Knanaya Catholic Congress of North America, which does not itself meet the notability criteria - only 120 unique Google hits [8] and they are all primary, trivial, and/or not reliable. No hits for the organization on Google News, Books or Scholar. This one seems like a pretty clear delete, to me. Dawn Bard ( talk) 15:00, 10 May 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. JohnCD ( talk) 19:58, 17 May 2012 (UTC) reply
Notability questions - does the number 1 player in Jedi Knight constitute a sufficient claim to notability? Are there multiple non-trivial mentions to support such a claim? Article is sourced to one website as of this nomination. Syrthiss ( talk) 14:43, 10 May 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Setting aside the comments from SPAs on both sides which aren't grounded in any kind of policy, it's clear that this doesn't quite meet notability requirements. The Blade of the Northern Lights ( 話して下さい) 22:38, 18 May 2012 (UTC) reply
If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
Contested WP:PROD. I listed my original concern as "No assertion of notability through reliable, published sources. Does not meet general notability guidelines as all sources are Wikis, Youtube, or other various fansites. No coverage in reliable third party media sources." I can't find any significant coverage from reliable sources. Teancum ( talk) 14:03, 10 May 2012 (UTC) reply
64.126.161.222 ( talk) 06:37, 12 May 2012 (UTC) reply
XxMiAmIPiMpiNxx ( talk) 09:00, 12 May 2012 (UTC) reply
Нихрена себе тут срач развели — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.34.174.199 ( talk) 15:54, 14 May 2012 (UTC) reply
Delete No sources, not notable, not something that requires a wikipedia page. I'm sure that someone could make a page for it on a more appropriate wiki. 38.116.202.11 ( talk) 14:40, 17 May 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was Redirect. Panyd The muffin is not subtle 16:33, 20 May 2012 (UTC) reply
WP:CRYSTAL, WP:HAMMER, pure speculation and only sourced to film gossip blogs. CaptainScreebo Parley! 13:04, 10 May 2012 (UTC) reply
<--
The result was delete. consensus is to delete, primarily WP:CRYSTAL, as notability cannot be established at this time ( talk→ BWilkins ←track) 15:47, 10 June 2012 (UTC) reply
WP:CRYSTAL, not getting any hits from VG/RS about this game or its development, not sure it'll be notable even once it's out. CaptainScreebo Parley! 12:58, 10 May 2012 (UTC) reply
-->
The result was redirect to Once Upon a Forest. JohnCD ( talk) 09:41, 18 May 2012 (UTC) reply
Deprodded with claim of sources on Google News. Weeding out the many, many false positives found only references to the film saying things like "This film, based upon a book by Rae Lambert…" and not saying another word about Rae. I couldn't find anything on this person at all, besides that they wrote the book Once Upon a Forest was based on. No biographical info, nor any proof beyond sales sites that "Mungo" exists. Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 12:43, 10 May 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. JohnCD ( talk) 20:57, 17 May 2012 (UTC) reply
Unencyclopaedic, arbitrary list, which authors, why? for starters. Incoherent, I don't read his stuff but I thought everybody knew Stieg Larsson was dead when his books were published. Doesn't seem to satisfy any of the criteria at Wikipedia:List#List_articles and finally because it appears to be the article creator's whim and nothing more ("created page, because I wanted there to be a list like this"). CaptainScreebo Parley! 12:16, 10 May 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete - with the understanding that many people voting on this AfD are not familiar with Wikipedia policy, please note that AfD discussions are not a matter of counting votes, but rather of gaining rough consensus based on the weight and appropriateness of policy as it pertains to the article.
As has been noted below, the subject of this article currently fails our standards of notability. Firstly, our general notability guidelines. These state that the subject of the article must have been the subject (in a non-trivial manner) of numerous, independent, secondary sources. The sources currently available on the article are PR pieces from the gentlemen's agency and small obituary notices.
The second objection to the article's inclusion on Wikipedia was that the subject fails our notability guidelines for entertainers. Specifically, this refers to the need for the subject to have had significant roles in multiple notable films, television shows, stage performances, or other productions. This is simply not the case here.
I offer this long closing in the hope that those who are new to Wikipedia will understand the rational behind both the deletion votes and this outcome. However, should anyone have any questions, please do feel free to ask me on my talk page. Should anyone wish to have the article moved to their userspace, they need only ask. Panyd The muffin is not subtle 20:57, 20 May 2012 (UTC) reply
If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
May fail WP:ENT. Article was created by Shanebitneycrone ( talk · contribs), who I believe was the now-deceased subject's partner. This video is of relevance to the subjects. See also, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shane Bitney Crone. Pyrrhus 16 12:13, 10 May 2012 (UTC) reply
As an attorney, I can state without hesitation, that this needs to remain intact. His life is not a secret, and the embarrassment of the immediate family does not constitute deletion. Gay and Lesbian persons will soon share equal rights with us all. 20 years ago we many not have believed a black president was a possibility, but our current [black] president is in support of gay marriage. There is no warrent under the stated guidelines that allows for deletion of this and, in fact, deletion would open the gates to discrimination lawsuits. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hodge2011 ( talk • contribs) 19:34, 10 May 2012 (UTC) reply
Keep. I think this is history for the LGBT community. Also Thomas Bridegroom seemed to be a notable person, hosted a TV show on MTV for example. Keverw ( talk) 11:38, 11 May 2012 (UTC) reply
Keep. The video circulating about his death has over a million views on Youtube, it's major news now whether or not it would have been significant on its own merits. Binerman ( talk) 16:03, 11 May 2012 (UTC) reply
KEEP. The YouTube video is powerful. People are going to keep googling him and coming to Wikipedia to find out more information. 184.32.6.164 ( talk) audrhi —Preceding undated comment added 19:23, 11 May 2012 (UTC). reply
<--
The result was delete. The consensus was to merge to Thomas Bridegroom, but that article has been deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thomas Bridegroom. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:17, 4 June 2012 (UTC) reply
May fail WP:ENT. Article was created by Thbridegroom ( talk · contribs), who I believe is the subject's now-deceased partner. This video is of relevance to the subjects. See also, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thomas Bridegroom. Pyrrhus 16 12:13, 10 May 2012 (UTC) reply
-->
The result was speedy delete. CSD G7, author's request. The article has been withdrawn by the only significant contributor.(I would however not suggest reposting.after the Declaration, unless there's some truly independent reliable substantial press coverage DGG ( talk ) 00:37, 12 May 2012 (UTC) reply
Non-notable fictional subject. No sources external to the creator that I could find. Syrthiss ( talk) 12:08, 10 May 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Unsourced BLP Ron Ritzman ( talk) 00:19, 18 May 2012 (UTC) reply
Unsourced BLP. I tagged it as such but the tags got removed. Links in the article are not related to the subject directly: they are either self-published or links to forums or homepages that do not mention the subject. Abanima ( talk) 10:48, 10 May 2012 (UTC) reply
BTW, in case the community agree that this article should be deleted, please consider also its clones on creator's personal and talk pages.-- Abanima ( talk) 10:55, 10 May 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman ( talk) 01:33, 17 May 2012 (UTC) reply
Unfortunately, I was unable to find enough reliable coverage for this suite. While I think that it may be a good idea and a good product, there just isn't enough coverage for it to warrant an article (at least until there is more coverage). Narutolovehinata5 t c csd new 11:26, 2 May 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy keep. I'm withdrawing my nomination, but please add those sources. DGG ( talk ) 00:39, 12 May 2012 (UTC) reply
As none of its games are notable , I don't see how the company has any notability either. DGG ( talk ) 08:43, 10 May 2012 (UTC) reply
As the author, the company has been around for a significant period of time, has received decent press in the industry (on its releases and the company) although not yet cited (I'm didn't include as I interpreted those as "advertising" (perhaps incorrectly). The company and its titles are on par with other iOS developers who have been listed in Wikipedia for some time, and seem to have met the notable requirement. Specific examples include (I'm sure I can find many others):
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Appy_Entertainment http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monica_(mobile_application) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Industrial_Toys http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guild_Software http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FreshGames
Everything included in the article is factual, verifiable, and I believe genuinely notable (specifically Gravity Well (product) and Riese. I am still very new to how Wikipedia works (so please excuse my ignorance on process), is there something specific I can do offer further proofs of notability? -- Frontalnugity ( talk) 10:57, 10 May 2012 (UTC) reply
Thanks for the follow-up, and from reading the general guide lines, still believe in earnest that it is notable. Although not the primary argument for notability, I do believe in the interest of fairness that similar articles is still a valid factor in consideration. More specifically though, the company (and President) been cited multiple times in print, newspaper, magazines and other online sources in regards to discussion and opinion on the industry. Specifically (and in addition to the 2 references you noted) the following are independent sources that appeared prominently in print, and can be seen online as well:
[15], [16], [17], [18], [19] (BC Medical Journal), [20], [21], [22], [23], [24], plus many product reviews not listed for reasons I mentioned above.
Should these (if accepted as "notable") be included as cited links in the article? -- Frontalnugity ( talk) 06:08, 11 May 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus. Opinions are equally divided between keep, merge (although it's not clear where to) and delete, so... no consensus. Sandstein 13:19, 21 May 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was Boldly merged to Luna Halo, most notable work. Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 00:24, 12 May 2012 (UTC) reply
The sources added by Colapeninsula right before the first AFD don't cut it. The first only indicates that Cary Barlowe was on a panel of judges; the second says literally nothing about Cary Barlowe, just naming him as the writer of a notable song; and the third is only a chart listing verifiying that said song (" American Honey") went to #1. The statement that he "has had five #1 songs with tobyMac" is inaccurate, as "Made to Love" is the only one of the five that Cory actually co-wrote. His Grammy nomination is a valid assertation of notability, but it was split among four writers, lessening the impact.
I searched and could not find any sources that said anything other than "Cary Barlowe wrote song X". The best I could find was this, which is a primary source. Colapeninsula later said that they could only find directory listings and sheet music. There's no denying that he meets WP:COMPOSER, but WP:COMPOSER is not ironclad; it's entirely possible to write several notable works and/or get a Grammy nomination, but not be notable yourself.
I'm hoping someone will actually !vote this time, as the last AFD was open for three weeks with no !voting whatsoever. Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 07:16, 10 May 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. JohnCD ( talk) 20:08, 17 May 2012 (UTC) reply
This person is not notable, there are no major contribution by this individual in the field of computer security. He has only created Cryptocat which is not significant or novel in the information security world. There are no novel publication by the said individual. The individual is known for his self-promotion and the promotion of Cryptocat. It would not surprise me that the individual creating this article, "Chargerqueen", is a close individual or the same person of this article. ManWithTheBlackHat ( talk) 03:05, 10 May 2012 (UTC) reply
ManWithTheBlackHat ( talk) 01:34, 12 May 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman ( talk) 01:38, 17 May 2012 (UTC) reply
This is an unsourced BLP about an MMA fighter that fails WP:MMANOT#Fighters. Winning a very minor organization's state championship does not show notability. Papaursa ( talk) 03:34, 10 May 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. JohnCD ( talk) 20:11, 17 May 2012 (UTC) reply
Female MMA fighter who has 2 professional fights. She has 1 victory and no title fights. She doesn't meet the level of notability inidicated for male MMA fighters at WP:MMANOT. Article was created by an SPA and fails to give any reason why this fighter is notable. Papaursa ( talk) 03:04, 10 May 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. JohnCD ( talk) 09:47, 18 May 2012 (UTC) reply
I think there's no need to create a disambiguation page for payphone and the red telephone box and payphone are both the same but different name for the British and American, respectively. j3j3j3 ... pfH0wHz 03:01, 10 May 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. JohnCD ( talk) 20:12, 17 May 2012 (UTC) reply
This article has a lot of puffery and lacks supported claims of notability. Subject has self-published books, an appearance in one movie as a stuntman, and supposedly did research for documentaries. There's no evidence to show he's notable as a martial artist, author, actor, or sculptor. Papaursa ( talk) 02:43, 10 May 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. JohnCD ( talk) 20:14, 17 May 2012 (UTC) reply
This is a non-notable college ball field.
The only mention in reliable sources is passing mention in obituaries about the field's namesake. Articles that are cited as coverage of the field are either promotional articles issued by FieldTurf (see here) or are articles published by the UIC Flames (see here and here. Bongo matic 02:07, 10 May 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. I think the consensus is clear enough after 2 relistings DGG ( talk ) 00:42, 12 May 2012 (UTC) reply
No assertion of notability per WP:BIO, WP:POLITICIAN or WP:AUTHOR; no significant coverage online from WP:Reliable sources; sole claim to notability appears to be that she married into a notable family. Scopecreep ( talk) 12:55, 2 May 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was redirect to Libertarian Party of Canada where the subject is mentioned. The debate has some calls for deletion, others to merge or redirect. On merits, the reference to WP:POLITICIAN is relevant, and the usual criteria for inclusion (statewide or higher office, or significant press coverage) have not been met, election to a local council is insufficient for a Wikipedia biography. Consensus is against a separate article, and is supported by the notability guideline. Since the guideline further suggests redirecting politicians that fall short of our notability guidelines to a relevant article, such as the office sought, I will not call this an outright deletion. In this case, the party he led seems to be the most relevant target. Sjakkalle (Check!) 16:46, 19 May 2012 (UTC) reply
Does not meet WP:POLITICIAN. Has never been elected, lead a party that has never held a seat. West Eddy ( talk) 22:57, 26 April 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was Keep. Panyd The muffin is not subtle 13:49, 21 May 2012 (UTC) reply
Does not meet WP:POLITICIAN. West Eddy ( talk) 22:51, 26 April 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus. I don't have access to the paywalled refs - however, there's no consensus here as to whether the subject has "received significant press coverage" or not. ( non-admin closure) -- Trevj ( talk) 13:25, 21 May 2012 (UTC) reply
Does not meet WP:POLITICIAN. Has never been elected, lead a party that has never held a seat. West Eddy ( talk) 22:48, 26 April 2012 (UTC) reply
{{
cite web}}
: Italic or bold markup not allowed in: |publisher=
(
help) (subscription required){{
cite web}}
: Italic or bold markup not allowed in: |publisher=
(
help) (subscription required)The result was no consensus. Perhaps a discussion on the talk page (a redlink as I write) on the possibility of merging this into the party's article could be held. While it may not be desireable to have a "permastub" BLP, there is no consensus to delete this article. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 16:38, 20 May 2012 (UTC) reply
Does not meet WP:POLITICIAN. Has never been elected, lead a party that has never held a seat. West Eddy ( talk) 22:47, 26 April 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was No consensus Me-123567-Me ( talk) 14:30, 16 May 2012 (UTC) reply
Does not meet WP:POLITICIAN. Has never been elected, lead a party that has never held a seat. West Eddy ( talk) 22:44, 26 April 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was keep Me-123567-Me ( talk) 14:28, 16 May 2012 (UTC) reply
Does not meet WP:POLITICIAN. Has never been elected, leads a party that has never held a seat. West Eddy ( talk) 22:40, 26 April 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was keep Me-123567-Me ( talk) 14:26, 16 May 2012 (UTC) reply
Does not meet WP:POLITICIAN. West Eddy ( talk) 22:14, 26 April 2012 (UTC) reply
I got a note because, apparently, I created this page 7 years ago. When I got the note, I was like "who the hell is Jim Webb" so on those grounds, I will not oppose any deletion.
Nickjbor (
talk)
22:38, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
reply
The result was delete. In view of the low participation, this is a WP:SOFTDELETE; as with a PROD, the article will be restored on request at WP:REFUND, but may then be renominated. JohnCD ( talk) 09:50, 18 May 2012 (UTC) reply
I don't think this is a notable artist... The article is single-sourced to artnexus.com, which I can't find any evidence of having editorial oversight... it seems more like a gallery catalog. The article claims that his work is hung all over the place, but I can't find any verification of it. Livit⇑ Eh?/ What? 22:08, 26 April 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus. No clear agreement, but it does appear the writer made the NYT bestseller list, so while neither position gained clear traction here, it seems appropriate to apply the usual default to keep. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 16:22, 20 May 2012 (UTC) reply
Claims to be a best-selling NYT author, which I can not authenticate; gives no references; I am unable to establish general notability. St John Chrysostom Δόξα τω Θεώ 20:33, 26 April 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. JohnCD ( talk) 09:55, 18 May 2012 (UTC) reply
Actor has only had bit parts. Not notable per WP:NACTOR. West Eddy ( talk) 01:11, 3 May 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. JohnCD ( talk) 09:53, 18 May 2012 (UTC) reply
I cannot find any evidence that Azar passes any one of the multiple SNGs that might apply to her (academic, author, etc.). Nolelover Talk· Contribs 15:34, 26 April 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was Withdrawn now that he has been selected to First All-Star team. - DJSasso ( talk) 11:45, 14 May 2012 (UTC) reply
Non-notable junior player who fails to meet WP:NHOCKEY. Can be recreated when/if he meets NHOCKEY or otherwise achieves notability. Was deprodded with the comment that leading scorer meets nhockey which is not true. Per nhockey he must be one of the top 10 scorers in lead history, not just a single season. DJSasso ( talk) 12:05, 26 April 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was delete without prejudice. Can be recreated or restored upon request at WP:REFUND. Ron Ritzman ( talk) 00:31, 18 May 2012 (UTC) reply
Non-notable junior player who has yet to meet WP:NHOCKEY. Was prodded and the prod was removed stating that playoff MVP met NHOCKEY but all player awards minus First-All Star Team were removed from the qualifications to meet NHOCKEY. Can be recreated when/if he meets WP:NHOCKEY. DJSasso ( talk) 12:03, 26 April 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. Panyd The muffin is not subtle 13:54, 21 May 2012 (UTC) reply
Advert for company. Lacks coverage in independent reliable sources, most current sources do not verify claims and none provide significant independent coverage of Pulse Recording. Notability is not inherited from clients. Current article is a textbook example of using bombardment to mask the lack of notability. duffbeerforme ( talk) 07:24, 3 May 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. JohnCD ( talk) 19:10, 17 May 2012 (UTC) reply
Fails WP:PROF/ WP:ACADEMIC. The subject has only 5 peer reviewed papers according to GScholar, and has a very low h-index of 4 as per citations-gadget. The article mentions a discovery made with Alastair Robinson, but the paper in which they described the discovery has only 10 citations to be considered an important one. Finally the primary author of the article User:Jeljen has contributed mainly to articles related to Alastair Robinson and the subject, which suggests a possible COI. Propose to delete. Westeros91 ( talk) 00:49, 10 May 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. The Blade of the Northern Lights ( 話して下さい) 22:42, 18 May 2012 (UTC) reply
What's the point of this article? It is a list of global companies with supposedly a presence in the city. No sources to confirm any of them. These global companies have a presence in many cities in many countries. And the point is? I left a notice in the article's talk page a month ago asking for comments before the AfD. No takers. I say it serves no purpose. Delete. Alexf (talk) 00:48, 10 May 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was keep, as renamed to Glove problem. I have deleted the original title as an implausible redirect, having replaced the only significant link to it in the List of mathematics articles. JohnCD ( talk) 19:47, 17 May 2012 (UTC) reply
Completing nomination for User:Lawikila. On the merits, I have no opinion. The original rationale, posted at the article's talk page, is copied verbatim below. UltraExactZZ Said ~ Did 12:36, 3 May 2012 (UTC) reply
No modification to the article have been made. Google scholar does not return any result for "safe sex makespan". One may grant that the problem is a legit OR problem, but if it has not a single hit on google scholar, possibly does not belong here. Though a simple google search of 'makespan' brings one here. The concept of 'makespan' is better explained in Job Shop Scheduling. I have nominated the article for deletion again. -- Lawikila ( talk) 04:26, 3 May 2012 (UTC) reply
Lawikila, you had all of the tools to enact the prior AFD consensus yourself. You can edit and rename articles, and you don't need some sort of magic permission to do so, certainly if enacting what a lot of people clearly think to be the best course of action. Don't follow in the footsteps of the no-effort people, such as the person above you on the article's talk page, who go around complaining that other people aren't making any effort, ironically putting more work into their complaints than would be needed for them just to do what they want done. And only nominate things for deletion when you want use of the deletion tool, that you do not have, and certainly wasn't needed in any way to do what you wanted done here. Remember: If "nobody has done anything in 6 years", then you yourself are part of the problem when you, too, do nothing with your tools. You have the tools. Use them! Uncle G ( talk) 14:05, 10 May 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman ( talk) 00:32, 18 May 2012 (UTC) reply
Per OTRS ticket 2012050210009563, the subject of this article is requesting it be deleted for privacy reasons. The subject wrote: "The information about me are completely wrong and false." Tiptoety talk 17:40, 3 May 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was redirect to Given to the Wild. The Blade of the Northern Lights ( 話して下さい) 22:41, 18 May 2012 (UTC) reply
This track is not independently notable despite being the product of a notable band. Salimfadhley ( talk) 20:16, 3 May 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman ( talk) 01:43, 17 May 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was redirect to United States House of Representatives elections in Pennsylvania, 2010#District 4. There is no consensus, yet, that candidates from major parties should be exempt from WP:POLITICIAN (and there would be problems of definition in countries where the distinction between major and minor parties is less clear-cut than in the US). JohnCD ( talk) 21:11, 17 May 2012 (UTC) reply
Doesn't meet notability criteria per WP:POLITICIAN Arbor8 ( talk) 16:30, 25 April 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Unsourced BLP. Ron Ritzman ( talk) 01:44, 17 May 2012 (UTC) reply
Unable to find reliable, secondary sources which evidence the notability of this singer. The Talented Teens awards aren't verified by the appropriate site before 1996, and I can't find a news article mentioning the award. The rest of what I found were self-published sources and Wikimirrors. Additional sources welcomed, as always. joe decker talk to me 00:37, 10 May 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Sandstein 07:02, 19 May 2012 (UTC) reply
Article is an "application" with no true notability. According to the article, it tracks worms in a laboratory environment, but I do not see notability asserted. Does not pass WP:GNG. -- Тимофей ЛееСуда. 02:11, 2 May 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. JohnCD ( talk) 19:09, 17 May 2012 (UTC) reply
Fails WP:PROF/ WP:ACADEMIC. The subject has only 8 peer reviewed papers according to GScholar, and has a very low h-index of 5 as per citations-gadget. Although the article mentions a discovery made by Robinson et. al., the paper in which they described the discovery has only 10 citations to be considered an important one. The subject is the brother of actress Zuleikha Robinson, but since notability is not inherited this isn't a good reason to keep the article. Finally, the primary author of the article User:Jeljen has contributed mainly to articles related to the subject, which suggests a possible COI. Propose to delete. Westeros91 ( talk) 00:37, 10 May 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman ( talk) 00:33, 18 May 2012 (UTC) reply
This appears to be a neologism, or at least a rarely used term for the more common rapid prototyping and 3D printing.-- Mike Selinker ( talk) 10:41, 24 April 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was this AFD smells. If somebody wishes to renominate this in good faith then be my guest. Ron Ritzman ( talk) 01:48, 17 May 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was redirect to Parodius (series). Ron Ritzman ( talk) 00:34, 18 May 2012 (UTC) reply
Non- notable game. It's been speedied (and denied because its a software product not eligible for speedy). It's been prodded (and that was removed by the author without explanation). So let's try AFD. Really, this is just another brand of Japanese slot machine. No indications of notability in the article or to be found elsewhere. WikiDan61 ChatMe! ReadMe!! 22:18, 3 May 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. No arguments for deletion aside from the nominator. However, I do agree that not every episode of a notable TV series should have a standalone article so I recommend a merge discussion be started on the main article's talk page or at one of the relevant wikiprojects. Ron Ritzman ( talk) 00:37, 18 May 2012 (UTC) reply
non notable individual episode. all plot. no refs. no critique Gaijin42 ( talk) 22:39, 3 May 2012 (UTC) reply
Concur with your criticisms, but don't think the article should be deleted, simply revised. JPX7 ( talk)