< February 28 | March 1 > |
---|
The result was delete as unreferenced original research nancy (talk) 19:10, 6 March 2008 (UTC) reply
Unreferenced original research. More suited for an urban dictionary. — ERcheck ( talk) 00:19, 1 March 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Speedy delete as copyvio. — ERcheck ( talk) 02:50, 1 March 2008 (UTC) reply
He has a nice resume, but he is only a high school band teacher. Does not pass WP:BIO and only has a minor ref Only two pages link there. Reywas92 Talk 23:54, 29 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Delete WP:COPYVIO. Esradekan Gibb "Talk" 02:15, 1 March 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Speedy delete - the character does not exist; the text has been copied from another article. Ckatz chat spy 05:33, 1 March 2008 (UTC) reply
A non-notable Harry Potter character. Captain panda 23:44, 29 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy delete under G11 criteria. Master of Puppets Call me MoP!☺ 07:32, 1 March 2008 (UTC) reply
This doesn't seem all that notable. Also appears to be something of an advertisement. Captain panda 23:41, 29 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Master of Puppets Call me MoP!☺ 17:08, 9 March 2008 (UTC) reply
It is a mixtape that just shows a track list. No reviews, no sales, etc. DiverseMentality ( talk) 01:32, 23 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Delete no references, third party citations. Who is it? Why is it notable? delete.-- Sallicio 09:46, 8 March 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was redirect to Politics. Currently a NN dicdef. Nothing to merge. Leave open for re-creation at another time. Bearian ( talk) 00:21, 6 March 2008 (UTC) reply
WP:NOT#DICTIONARY. Maybe redirect to Politics. Captain panda 23:10, 29 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus. Bearcat ( talk) 20:47, 7 March 2008 (UTC) reply
I can find no reliable sources about this club. There are only a couple of hundred Google hits, not all of them about this group, but most of them either forums or the group's own website. Nothing in Google news. It was speedy deleted once, then undeleted after the article's creating editor applied at WP:DRV. Corvus cornix talk 22:51, 29 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Corvus, you may want to take another look at Google News. Now, the topic was brought up by Deb about the organization's "Notability". From the wiki-notability page, found at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Notability, "A topic is presumed to be notable if it has received significant coverage in reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject." We have 4 outside news articles now. The organization has also been the subject of numerous news specials, as well. Such videos can be found on their page, http://holyrollerz.org/?view=media. The American Bible Society did a great interview, can a video be cited as a source for information? KKEI Radio did another great interview, also on the page. the SPEED Channel did an episode featuring them, and also listed is the exert from the movie R Generation where they were featured. My Wiki skills as limited, and I am working on improving them. This on-going struggle trying to meet Wiki's guidelines for a page is sure helping, but I need some help as well. Can videos linked from the organization's own web page, but preformed by notable outside sources be used in citation? Skiendog ( talk) 15:47, 2 March 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Transwiki and redirect. I've got an account on Wikisource, so I've moved the text of the license over there. I have also redirected the page. Keilana| Parlez ici 18:36, 9 March 2008 (UTC) reply
Lack of content, mostly just a copy of the full text version of the license. Notability concerns have been given, and I agree that it's not of major interest of the world. → Aza Toth 22:33, 29 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Deleteor transwiki...fails WP:NOT-- Sallicio 09:49, 8 March 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete -- JForget 23:43, 5 March 2008 (UTC) reply
Contested prod, which also included a concern (now addressed) about a non-GFDL copyright by its creator. Neologism of no asserted notability. Looks like WP:MADEUP.
The result was Delete. Icestorm815 • Talk 21:06, 6 March 2008 (UTC) reply
A completely unreferenced article about a living person is a
WP:BLP violation since the information within it cannot be
verified. I have been unable to find any suitable
reliable sources on which to base the article. It seems unlikely that the topic of the article is
notable, there is no evidence of siginicant coverage by reliable sources, independent of the subject or that the they meet any of the criteria set out in
WP:MUSIC.
Guest9999 (
talk) 21:27, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
reply
Delete per nom. Non-notable Dreamspy ( talk) 21:39, 29 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Keep. Keilana| Parlez ici 18:39, 9 March 2008 (UTC) reply
Unnecessary and odd article that appears to be a break off from the main, except it combines awards from two series in one article. Buffy's already appear to be adequately covered in Buffy the Vampire Slayer (TV series), though any missing ones could easily be merged into the prose. Ditto Angel's awards. AnmaFinotera ( talk) 21:10, 29 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus to delete, default to keep. Canley ( talk) 02:30, 6 March 2008 (UTC) reply
No matter how popular the series is, individual DVD releases are NOT notable. This is already adequately covered in the Buffy the Vampire Slayer (TV series)#main article. As this isn't a retail site, there is no need for disc by disc contents. AnmaFinotera ( talk) 21:07, 29 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. - Philippe | Talk 20:45, 7 March 2008 (UTC) reply
Doesn't seem to be a notable artist; makes a couple claims to notability but nothing that seems to meet WP:BIO. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ( Broken clamshells• Otter chirps) 20:53, 29 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Keep after improvements made by Coffee4me asserting/solidifying the notability of the organization.-- JForget 23:48, 5 March 2008 (UTC) reply
No claim of notability in article. Oo7565 ( talk) 07:23, 22 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. John254 00:40, 5 March 2008 (UTC) reply
Non-notable low budget Mexican film that's only just been released (10 Feb 2008). No big names, no big studios, no big budgets nothing to demonstrate any notability. WebHamster 13:22, 21 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Closed early and DELETED as a copyvio and I am so sick of this Xenaphilic sockpuppet. But| seriously| folks 22:39, 4 March 2008 (UTC) reply
Completely unnotable book. Already deleted once as creator copy/pasted the first from another website (and this looks like it may be the same thing, upon closer inspection. This is the source site: http://www.ee.surrey.ac.uk/Contrib/Xena/books.html which is another URL for http://www.vidiot.com/Contrib/Xena/books.html#official/). Another inappropriate article created by a very rabid Xena fan... Collectonian ( talk) 20:23, 29 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete -- JForget 23:51, 5 March 2008 (UTC) reply
Only claim to fame appears to be that they now do some work for NPR. Went through an uncontested speedy six days ago as CommerceTel but it appears to be back now. Also, while not strictly an argument for deletion, the sole contributor appears to have a conflict of interest [4] -- Jaysweet ( talk) 20:22, 29 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete all. henrik• talk 15:02, 9 March 2008 (UTC) reply
Non-notable footballer, playing for Lyon reserves and youth football do not confer notability under WP:FOOTY/Notability or WP:ATHLETE which state that the player must have played at professional level.
(note: PROD tag was removed from Loïc Abenzoar, Romain Dedola and Jeremy Pied without explanation or any attempt to make the articles assert notability).
I am also nominating the following because none of the following Lyon youth team players have played at professional level:
- English peasant 20:11, 29 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Note: The following list of articles are being dealt with separately and do not form part of this AfD
Well, if that's the case. Then take care of these while you're at it.
And there's alot more where that came from.— Preceding unsigned comment added by ThaKid555 ( talk • contribs)
The result was Delete. Keilana| Parlez ici 18:45, 9 March 2008 (UTC) reply
Failed prod. Subject appears to be a DJ getting a start on his career, but not notable in WP terms. Google search for subject's name in quotes yields around 250 hits when Wikipedia is excluded. Unable to find independant treatment of any of subject's four songs, although they are available for download at certain sites. Does not appear to meet any of the criteria for WP:MUSIC. Xymmax ( talk) 19:54, 29 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Actually, I'm not a DJ. I'm a registered artist and songwriter (ASCAP). I'm appearing in a new show piloted to MTV called "The Ultimate Guido" featuring Brett Broski from the popular "My New Haircut" video. You won't find "Carousel" my 2008 track yet because it has not yet leaked. As far as my other tracks, if you view my myspace page you can see how many hits I've had (substantially larger than the average person "starting out"). I have and am currently working with A-list producers (Freebass, Spliffington Management, and Cory Bold). I was on the Top 100 in "Top Artists" in Florida for months (myspace). The only reason I am not currently there, is because I have not released any new material yet (for months now). I have an interview featuring in Axis Magazine which releases in April (a popular magazine in Florida). I have fans that stretch primarily from New Jersey, New York, and Florida. My wikipedia was created not only as a marketing tool, but to keep my fans well informed of what is and will be happening. If in fact I have violated any terms, or have not provided enough information, I will do everything necessary to fix it. Please keep me informed.
Thanks, Mikey Stylez —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.26.177.72 ( talk) 08:00, 3 March 2008 (UTC) reply
anyone can be a registered artist. any1 can pay for a producer or be friends with producers. anyone can have a couple fans.any1 can create an llc. to this kid a leaked song is when he leaks it himself. this kid has no evidence of being anything special. delete this page untill this wanna-be's name is on some records as part of the credits. if it ever is. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 132.170.40.146 ( talk) 00:22, 3 March 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 132.170.34.61 ( talk) reply
First off, I wasn't even the one who created this page. Second off, wikipedia is a free online encyclopedia used by many to find information. The information provided is currently up to date and valid. Whether or not someone classifies me as "special" should not subject the page to be deleted. If your so stuck on making sure wikipedia is full of only facts, stop accepting the opinions of others as valid statements. If you are really going to consider the opinions of people who obviously have nothing better to do than vandalize my page, then go ahead and delete it. To the ignorant person above me, you should not only do research about who I am and who I know, but you should worry about your own life and not mine. P.S. The person above me has vandalized my wikipedia page before from the UCF college campus, check his history. 76.26.177.72 ( talk) 05:02, 4 March 2008 (UTC)Mikey Stylez. reply
Delete Per above concerns-- NAH ID 13:45, 4 March 2008 (UTC) reply
Thanks Xymmax, I actually made a few phone calls regarding your comment as far as notability and proof. I asked the producer Cory Bold, to directly link me with his 2008 discography because like I have already stated, it is contracted already and confirmed for release. I start filming for the MTV show this saturday and obviously until it airs, I won't even mention it on here. I am just trying to avoid the deletion and re-creation of this page, as you obviously know that will not look professional for me at all. Anything you can think of to further prove and show my notability, I'm willing to do. Thanks, 76.26.177.72 ( talk) 20:42, 4 March 2008 (UTC)Mikey Stylez reply
The result was Speedy keep, WP:SNOW, obviously meets WP:BIO. NawlinWiki ( talk) 21:08, 29 February 2008 (UTC) reply
While AfD is not cleanup, this "article" reads like a resume, or at least a fan magazine entry. Its over-use of flowery adjectives, and so on lead me to believe that this was/is plagiarised from somewhere. If so, it needs deletion, and to be started over. - jc37 19:31, 29 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Speedy Delete per CSD G3. UltraExactZZ Claims ~ Evidence 21:15, 29 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Appears to be copied from Guitar Hero: Aerosmith and just has the name changes, refs match Guitar Hero: Aerosmith. However there are a couple of google hits for the topic so not enough for a speedy personally. SGGH speak! 19:27, 29 February 2008 (UTC) SGGH speak! 19:27, 29 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Keep, great improvements to the article during AFD demonstrate that clearly meets the main notaiblity criterion at WP:BIO of significant coverage in reliable sources. Davewild ( talk) 10:16, 2 March 2008 (UTC) reply
"nn rookie league minor league player, drafted this year, very unlikely to reach the majors now that he had Tommy John surgery that early in his "career", no indepentent sources to meet WP:N" *ndsah; as written by Secret ( talk · contribs) [5]. Anonymous user disagrees so I am listing it on AFD. hbdragon88 ( talk) 03:59, 25 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. John254 00:38, 5 March 2008 (UTC) reply
Can't find any reliable sources to confirm whether this event ever occurred. Tim! ( talk) 19:01, 29 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. John254 00:39, 5 March 2008 (UTC) reply
Unsourced article, too little context to establish if this actually happened. The link from Irish battles hints that it may have been in Ireland, but Ireland is not even mentioned in the article. Tim! ( talk) 18:42, 29 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. — David Eppstein ( talk) 03:18, 6 March 2008 (UTC) reply
Unsourced article, too little context to establish if this actually happened. The link from Irish battles hints that it may have been in Ireland, but Ireland is not even mentioned in the article. Tim! ( talk) 18:38, 29 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was NO CONSENSUS, which is to say that some editorial work is required to treat the article, which does not appear likely to remain as a standalone piece of work. - Splash - tk 21:27, 9 March 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. Keilana| Parlez ici 18:52, 9 March 2008 (UTC) reply
This survived an AfD almost three years ago, when the software was new and in the news. However ghits!notability and press releases are not RS coverage. There;s no evidence of notability for this software. TRAVELLINGCARI My story Tell me yours 18:38, 29 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Keep. Keilana| Parlez ici 18:53, 9 March 2008 (UTC) reply
Procedural listing, per result of deletion review. The original concern, from Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jawahar Shah, was that the subject isn't notable. A number of potential sources were raised at the DRV and should be examined for reliability. In addition, at the DRV a concern was raised that the article was self-posted. I am neutral. Mango juice talk 18:30, 29 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Speedy Delete. Esteffect ( talk) 03:22, 1 March 2008 (UTC) reply
Failed Prod. Non notable game. As per the article, created on Jan 29, 2008 in Seaford Christian Academy by five people mentioned in the article. Weltanschaunng 17:59, 29 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete per both consensus and the author's request below (G7). Keilana| Parlez ici 19:17, 9 March 2008 (UTC) reply
Non-notable, no references to support notability ukexpat ( talk) 17:21, 29 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete -- JForget 23:55, 5 March 2008 (UTC) reply
Contested prod. All references are self-published. h i s s p a c e r e s e a r c h 17:15, 29 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Added external references Brandonsturgeon ( talk) 18:51, 29 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Speedy keep as AFD started by banned user. Will ( talk) 16:29, 3 March 2008 (UTC) reply
Wikipedia is not a list, serves no sueful purpose, not notable Cholga talK! 17:14, 29 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete, regardless of whether the nominator has been blocked there is still a strong consensus for deletion due to the lack of reliable sources. Davewild ( talk) 07:55, 6 March 2008 (UTC) reply
Orphaned since 2007, does not assert notability, is unreferneced, has one link, nn subject, OR issues Cholga talK! 17:11, 29 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. — David Eppstein ( talk) 03:22, 6 March 2008 (UTC) reply
Article with minimal content for non-notable 12-story office building in Lafayette, Louisiana. No sources included or found in search. Prod contested without reason given. • Gene93k ( talk) 16:37, 29 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. Fram ( talk) 10:36, 6 March 2008 (UTC) reply
Short: fictional races fail WP:GAMECRUFT. Long: the subject of this article has not received any significant, non-trivial coverage in reliable third party publications. User:Krator ( t c) 16:40, 29 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was redirected to 2008 in home video. Will ( talk) 01:07, 1 March 2008 (UTC) reply
This article had a proposed deletion tag on it, however someone objected to the deletion on the talk page of the article, making the deletion controversial, so I brought it to AfD. Essentially this article is just a list of DVDs released in 2008. No references are given, there isn't even an encyclopedia article here. The article violates WP:DIRECTORY, and fails WP:V and WP:RS. There is no need for this article in Wikipedia, if someone wants this info they'll get an ACCURATE list at IMDb. -- Atama chat 16:39, 29 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. Fram ( talk) 10:41, 6 March 2008 (UTC) reply
Short: fictional races fail WP:GAMECRUFT. Long: the subject of this article has not received any significant, non-trivial coverage in reliable third party publications. User:Krator ( t c) 16:36, 29 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. John254 00:36, 5 March 2008 (UTC) reply
Disputed prod. This LOOKS well sourced but the cites lead nowhere. The Barbie website doesn't list this film, the Hollywood Reporter article doesn't cite it by name, and all I can find on Amazon is a sticker book. The dolls apparently exist, or will exist, but the film is not mentioned in connection with them. The official Universal Studios site doesn't list this as a forthcoming film. Doesn't meet verifiability policy, probably WP:NOT#CRYSTAL or WP:NFF. Accounting4Taste: talk 16:16, 29 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Additionally, films that have already begun shooting, but have not yet been publicly released (theatres or video), should not have their own articles, unless the production itself is notable per notability guidelines.
The result was Keep as their arguments are more solid then the other camp-- JForget 00:01, 6 March 2008 (UTC) reply
Unremarkable publication; article does not cite significance. richi ( talk) 16:02, 29 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Commas are not merely decorative. The arbcom injunction does not apply here. Angus McLellan (Talk) 20:11, 9 March 2008 (UTC) reply
Prod tag removed by another editor, although I should have explained my reasoning a little better. This is a non-notable character who is so minor that he doesn't even warrant mentioning in the suggested merge target. In fact, the only Fried Green Tomatoes article linking to this one is the movie, and then it's only telling us that the character was cut out of the screenplay. Biography is drawing from the main source, but it borders on an original research summary, and certainly has no reliable third party sources demonstrating notability. Nick Penguin( contribs) 20:43, 13 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was keep per WP:HEY. Article will be tagged, however. Bearian ( talk) 01:40, 6 March 2008 (UTC) reply
Merely an overly long bibliography. DarkAudit ( talk) 15:12, 29 February 2008 (UTC) reply
I just put in a whole summary of his personal life and professional background, but it was deleted. I am reinserting. Adil Shamoo is my stepfather and I am fixing his entry as a favor to him. He has the rights to all the info on his University of Maryland page, and I am using that as a basis for the Wikipedia entry. Please don't delete before I have time to finish. —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Melby19 (
talk •
contribs) 15:25, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
reply
It's not a conflict of interest to merely post information. Look through the article. There is nothing subjective there.
Content from bio has been added (with reference), and bibliogrpahy has been reduced. —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Melby19 (
talk •
contribs) 15:42, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
reply
I can rewrite the bio, but I need time. Please don't delete this page so fast again. I am moving as quickly as I can. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Melby19 ( talk • contribs) 16:01, 29 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. Consensus is delete - and article does appear to be borderline spam. One interesting (confused?) nomination other than the authors to keep discounted as non-assisting. -- VS talk 05:38, 8 March 2008 (UTC) reply
Non-notable website, borderline spam. See the Afd for the main term, which is looking like a re-direct. I see no point in re-directing this nn website or the following, which is pure OR and bundled for the same reasons:
The result was Delete -- JForget 00:04, 6 March 2008 (UTC) reply
Contested prod. Still does not assert notability. Roleplayer ( talk) 13:35, 29 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. The addition during this discussion of properly cited information showing that this album placed on charts and earned platinum means it's notable, and most people have agreed. Non-admin closure. Shalom ( Hello • Peace) 10:40, 7 March 2008 (UTC) reply
I do not know if I've done this right.I've nominated this article for deletion because it lacks notability. Best of compilation albums and anthologies aren't notable and their inclusion isn't of any encyclopedic value.Also this article is simply a list of what's on the album. Tjc ( talk) 13:25, 29 February 2008 (UTC) reply
...album pages so users can get the basic information fast, creating high-quality new pages, ensuring a standardized format and make articles as informative as possible.
In my opinion, this article lets users get the basic information about the CD fast, and therefore should be kept. Adammw ( talk) 05:01, 1 March 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus so keep for now. It is a well-sourced stub about a notable and controversial topic. The delete votes, while more numerous, appear to be arguments about content, not WP:CRYSTAL. Bearian ( talk) 00:31, 6 March 2008 (UTC) reply
According to the definition of a recession:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recession
"In macroeconomics, a recession is a decline in a country's gross domestic product (GDP), or negative real economic growth, for two or more successive quarters of a year."
As of 2/28/08, there is no "recession of 2008," nor any indication that one is imminent. This page should be deleted. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fp19691 ( talk • contribs) 16:04, 28 February 2008
The result was Keep. Keilana| Parlez ici 18:56, 9 March 2008 (UTC) reply
Due to the application of an interpretation of Wikipedia policy on trademark images, this article has been badly damaged and should be removed. An article that talks about the symbols of Scientology, while not being able to show any of them is useless. AndroidCat ( talk) 09:37, 29 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. — David Eppstein ( talk) 03:30, 6 March 2008 (UTC) reply
SF / horror author of questioned notability; brought here as contested speedy, but also to discuss together with his books, listed below. Tikiwont ( talk) 13:06, 29 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was speedily deleted as WP:CSD A7 non-notable bio. Elkman (Elkspeak) 14:04, 29 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Delete Fails WP:BIO and WP:RS. Otolemur crassicaudatus ( talk) 13:03, 29 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy delete per G11 criteria. Master of Puppets Call me MoP!☺ 07:34, 1 March 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete -- JForget 00:07, 6 March 2008 (UTC) reply
PROD contested. A 'new term' that is so new (article states "early months of 2008" having been created at the end of February) that it cannot be notable enough to be, say, included in the OED. A handful of examples of a journalistic phrase cannot be sufficient to warrant an article on the topic. Fritzpoll ( talk) 12:09, 29 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was consensus to delete as failing notabilty requirement. nancy (talk) 19:36, 6 March 2008 (UTC) reply
Non-notable technology company. There are 20 references on the page, not a single one meets our standards, it is a mixture of self-penned listings, directories and self-penned websites, they are a couple of sources that almost meet our standards but the mention of mymobility is so trivial as to fail as a source. I cannot find nothing that would suggest that better sources exist. Fredrick day ( talk) 11:56, 29 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete -- JForget 00:10, 6 March 2008 (UTC) reply
This seems to be a non-notable company attempting to spam its way into Wikipedia. The page was originally started on 6 May 2007 by User:Abir1975 - one of the founders of the company is stated as Abir Banerjee. A Google search (-Wikipedia) returns 12 hits, almost all being directory entries. There are no independent references via Google. The whole tone of the 'article' reeks of self-publicity, not surprising given that it is almost word-for-word the same as the company's website. The website reveals that the company has been involved in six events only, which hardly makes it a major player, and the apparent sponsorship by notable people does not, in itself, confer notability. In the absence of independent references, I feel this is not suitable for Wikipedia. Emeraude ( talk) 11:43, 29 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was KEEP. There is clear support to retain the article (now across two AfDs), and the policy basis for doing so seems sound enough. There is also agreement that it could use some editorial help, but that's not a reason to delete. - Splash - tk 21:40, 9 March 2008 (UTC) reply
This page is nothing but three reports "proving" that the subject exists. There have been no reliable sources put forward that discuss the subject. The previous AfD was in July 2006. Since then, the article has not been touched since November 2007, and before that, since February 2007. The article was kept so that it could undergo a clean-up and better sourcing - I think it's fair to say this isn't going to happen. Balkan Fever 11:24, 29 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Chessy999 ( talk) 22:52, 29 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. Glass Cobra 09:12, 6 March 2008 (UTC) reply
Delete Fails WP:N and WP:RS. Otolemur crassicaudatus ( talk) 11:22, 29 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Speedy Delete per CSD A7 by Starblind (non-admin close). — Travis talk 19:13, 29 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Seems to be about a nonnotable player character in the online game Anarchy Online. A7 for people doesn't apply (not sure if this counts as "web content") Vivio Testarossa Talk Who 11:13, 29 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete -- JForget 00:11, 6 March 2008 (UTC) reply
Delete Fails WP:N, WP:RS. Otolemur crassicaudatus ( talk) 11:11, 29 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete -- JForget 00:13, 6 March 2008 (UTC) reply
Expired PROD, reason was "Neologism; no sources given", but a Google news search shows a number of independent references to the term suggesting that it may have notability. So I'm AfD'ing it because I think it needs discussion. Don't have an opinion myself. — SMALL JIM 11:02, 29 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was DELETE. It's a copyvio from [37]. - Splash - tk 21:58, 9 March 2008 (UTC) reply
Delete no WP:RS, fails WP:N. Otolemur crassicaudatus ( talk) 08:57, 20 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. Canley ( talk) 02:25, 6 March 2008 (UTC) reply
Not particularly notable as far as I can tell and is little more than a tracklisting, which is discouraged by WP:MUSIC. Cordless Larry ( talk) 09:17, 20 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Sorry about that I must have missed it. While I have met Cameron I would not say I know him. In the same way I have met president bush, roger clemens, etc. He is a member of several other boards including the Rondo Hatton original site. Again sorry for the tardiness of my reply. Joe Wallace ( talk) 01:44, 28 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete, no prejudice for recreation as appropriate redirect. Glass Cobra 09:09, 6 March 2008 (UTC) reply
POV, and highly confusing, fork of Communist Party of India (Maoist). Soman ( talk) 15:18, 20 February 2008 (UTC) reply
User:Soman is not allowing others to Contribute.
User:Soman is disrupting important information that was requested by Politicians and others to create. All refferences with pages have been provided. User:Sonam seems to be incooperative by nominating important articles and related articles which must be made. User fails to Understand Recent activties and Joint Operations which have been taken place recently. --
TigersRus (
talk) 09:09, 21 February 2008 (UTC) Comment by blocked sock puppet struck out at relist.
Tikiwont (
talk) 09:42, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
reply
The result was Keep Neighborhood, geo locations are notable and also the nominator has been blocked for sockpuppetry and disruption.-- JForget 00:20, 6 March 2008 (UTC) reply
not a notable neighborhood, way too small Cholga talK! 09:52, 29 February 2008 (UTC) reply
...and speedy close - article is now adequately sourced. Nomination is by a confirmed sockpuppet, whose recent deletion spree was part of the abusive behavior that got him indefinitely blocked. [38] Wikidemo ( talk) 18:19, 1 March 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Keep. Glass Cobra 09:06, 6 March 2008 (UTC) reply
Elementary schools are not notable Cholga talK! 09:49, 29 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy keep. Nomination was disruption by blocked sockpuppet. EJF ( talk) 12:17, 2 March 2008 (UTC) reply
Unreferenced, not notable Cholga talK! 09:48, 29 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy keep. Nomination was disruption by blocked sockpuppet. EJF ( talk) 12:15, 2 March 2008 (UTC) reply
Unreferenced, not notable Cholga talK! 09:47, 29 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy keep. Nomination was disruption by blocked sockpuppet. EJF ( talk) 12:13, 2 March 2008 (UTC) reply
unreferneced, non-notable Cholga talK! 09:46, 29 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy keep - disruption by blocked sockpuppet. EJF ( talk) 12:04, 2 March 2008 (UTC) reply
not notable, does not assert notability Cholga talK! 09:45, 29 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy keep. Nomination was disruption by blocked sockpuppet. EJF ( talk) 12:08, 2 March 2008 (UTC) reply
nn unreferenced Cholga talK! 09:43, 29 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy keep. Nomination was disruption by blocked sockpuppet. EJF ( talk) 12:11, 2 March 2008 (UTC) reply
unreferenced, dubious notability Cholga talK! 09:41, 29 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy keep . Nomination was disruption by User:Cholga, a blocked sockpuppet. EJF ( talk) 11:55, 2 March 2008 (UTC) reply
not notable, unrefernced Cholga talK! 09:40, 29 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Keep, nomination withdrawn. Davewild ( talk) 09:08, 1 March 2008 (UTC) reply
Not notable, completely unreferenced Cholga
talK! 09:39, 29 February 2008 (UTC)-convinced to not deleteCholga
talK! 21:00, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
reply
The result was speedy keep. Nomination was disruption by a blocked sockpuppet. EJF ( talk) 11:59, 2 March 2008 (UTC) reply
Completely unreferenced, dubious notabaility Cholga talK! 09:37, 29 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy keep - disruption by blocked sockpuppet. EJF ( talk) 12:02, 2 March 2008 (UTC) reply
Unreferenced Cholga talK! 09:36, 29 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete faithless (speak) 06:24, 7 March 2008 (UTC) reply
Not notable in her own right, only known for presenting quiz shows. No significant role in notable shows, doesn't appear to have a large fan base or significant following, and hasn't made a unique contribution to entertainment. As such fails the entertainer guidelines of WP:BIO Fritzpoll ( talk) 09:33, 29 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Delete, lousy ministub on nn subj.Cholga talK! 09:38, 29 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete -- JForget 00:23, 6 March 2008 (UTC) reply
Appears to fail WP:NOTE: no indication of non-trivial coverage in reliable sources independent of the subject. скоморохъ 09:32, 29 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was merge. -- Moonriddengirl (talk) 19:09, 9 March 2008 (UTC) reply
Non notable school ( WP:N), lousy written and formated and sourced "article" Cholga talK! 09:28, 29 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was merge to Natomas Unified School District. -- Moonriddengirl (talk) 15:28, 9 March 2008 (UTC) reply
Non-notable ( WP:N) school. Cholga talK! 09:22, 29 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. I'll re-create it for the other band, though. Glass Cobra 07:03, 6 March 2008 (UTC) reply
Non notable band. Fails WP:MUSIC, bands only claim to fame is being 'The best band of the year 2007' tag of one DRockstar competition. Haven't released an album as per the article itself. Weltanschaunng 08:25, 29 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. John254 00:34, 5 March 2008 (UTC) reply
Delete Fails WP:RS and WP:V. Also question of WP:CRYSTAL. Otolemur crassicaudatus ( talk) 08:18, 29 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete, since the lack of reliable sources has not been addressed. Tikiwont ( talk) 10:04, 5 March 2008 (UTC) reply
Entirely unverified speculation about a forthcoming album. There is no actual content here - not even an album title to give the article its proper name. The supposed confirmation that the album will even exist is a blog entry "p.s. I asked Santa for another PCD album and I think he's gonna make it happen in 08!! ;) Lots of love, Ash". Article was PRODded and this was endorsed by another editor but then the tags were removed by another editor citing Ignore All Rules so we have no actual justification for keeping the article; rather than ignore all rules myself and put the PROD tags back I am bringing it here. Ros0709 ( talk) 08:18, 29 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete per WP:V, WP:N and WP:RS, as well as WP:FILM. Bearian ( talk) 01:44, 6 March 2008 (UTC) reply
Delete Fails WP:V, WP:N and WP:RS. Otolemur crassicaudatus ( talk) 08:15, 29 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete, noting that according to the talk page this list seems to have been specifically compiled for the 2007 anniversary of the Falkland war to "bring people together". Tikiwont ( talk) 09:48, 5 March 2008 (UTC) reply
Indiscriminate list of non-notable seamen who served on a particular ship during a 3 year period. Clearly unencyclopedic. Drdisque ( talk) 07:26, 29 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Delete Wikipedia:NOT#INFO. Esradekan Gibb "Talk" 02:25, 1 March 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Speedy Delete per CSD A7 by Orangemike (non-admin close). — Travis talk 19:15, 29 February 2008 (UTC) reply
They do not appear to be a notable band. Article appears to be solely written by members of the band. Recommend they get some press before declaring themselves notable? Strtpclnrd ( talk) 07:20, 29 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Delete, possibly a CSD:A7 candidate as I see no real claim of viability. - Drdisque ( talk) 07:28, 29 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. -- Moonriddengirl (talk) 15:25, 9 March 2008 (UTC) reply
Children's book to assist in learning to read. No assertion of notability in the article. 61 Google hits suggests it is non-notable and probably being promoted by its author. -- RHaworth ( Talk | contribs) 07:14, 29 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was MERGE to Strawberry Flower. Much is already there; I've merged the other stuff, but it seems a little crufty. - Splash - tk 22:13, 9 March 2008 (UTC) reply
No sources, no nothing. violates WP:Crystal Momusufan ( talk) 05:27, 29 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Redirect to Distance education (non-admin closure). It should be noted that merge and redirect is a perfectly acceptable outcome of an AfD discussion. RFBailey ( talk) 04:35, 8 March 2008 (UTC) reply
Article is a United States-centric content fork from Distance education and Diploma mill, with a strong dose of "how to guide" included. The article content is very thin, and I think part of it is original research. It has one very solid source, which I copied into the Distance education article before posting this. Because the article scope is covered by those other articles and Category:Distance education institutions, and the article is practically an orphan, it won't be missed. Orlady ( talk) 05:17, 29 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. Tiptoety talk 06:55, 3 March 2008 (UTC) reply
I speedied this as spam but an admin suggested I take it to AfD, so here it is. I find no rs coverage of this company and the only evidence of the "awards" is on their own sites. Regular ghits appear to be primarily directory listings. Notable clients != notable company, and I don't think this passes WP:CORP especially if we can't verify the awards. TRAVELLINGCARI My story Tell me yours 05:12, 29 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Delete Esradekan Gibb "Talk" 02:26, 1 March 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Speedy Delete - Article was already speedy deleted. - Djsasso ( talk) 15:02, 29 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Does not meet WP Ice Hockey notability standards. Has not played, professionally, not a high draft pick, not an Olympian, etc. – Nurmsook! ( talk) 04:58, 29 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Deleteper above, doesn't meet WP:N. ArcAngel ( talk) 05:37, 29 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. Tikiwont ( talk) 09:44, 5 March 2008 (UTC) reply
Fails music and bio guidelines. Google searches yield 59 results and most of them are to her/his site or the wiki page. Delete Undeath ( talk) 04:28, 29 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Delete article fails to establish notability as per WP:MUSIC. Esradekan Gibb "Talk" 02:27, 1 March 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. Glass Cobra 06:58, 6 March 2008 (UTC) reply
Article is a list of episodes in a DVD set already covered with the InuYasha article. Article is WP:LISTCRUFT and contains questionable images. KellyAna ( talk) 04:10, 29 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Speedy delete by User:Jayron32, non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ( Broken clamshells• Otter chirps) 05:07, 29 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Non-notable "new" but closed beta computer game. I know that being a badly written article is not a reason to delete, but c'mon is this a Google translation? Anyway, nomination is purely on the grounds of notability and not on bad grammar... "Beyond protocol is a new mmorts that for the first time in years takes the mmorts genre to its fullest by have very few to no actuall restrictions to how large a singel player can become." WebHamster 03:51, 29 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was DELETE. There appears to be a conclusion that the material is non-notable even if it were in an acceptable format, and with copyright problems resolved. - Splash - tk 22:19, 9 March 2008 (UTC) reply
Wrong way to upload information to wikipedia. Both files are not being used/linked to any other pages. The copyright is also a bit iffy. Delete Undeath ( talk) 03:29, 29 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Boldly redirected by me, since nom struck out "delete" !vote and replaced with "redirect". Non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ( Broken clamshells• Otter chirps) 03:53, 29 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Per
this comment, this page appears to be a POV fork of
Mulatto. I and one other user attempted to redirect, but were reverted. Recommend Delete and Salt Redirect. //
Chris
(complaints)•
(contribs) 03:23, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
reply
The result was keep. John254 00:33, 5 March 2008 (UTC) reply
nn soccer player no sources did a google seach could not find anything on him playing ever Oo7565 ( talk) 03:00, 29 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Elmer Montoya, I remember him playing for Motagua. I can most certainly find news articles or even videos with him just give me a few mins. Chupu ( talk) 04:53, 29 February 2008 (UTC) reply
here's a news article talking about who is leaving each club for a season, look under Motagua. http://www.elheraldo.hn/nota.php?nid=15060&sec=5&fecha=2004-07-05 and here's a news article talking about training at Motagua http://www.elheraldo.hn/nota.php?nid=44964&sec=5&fecha=2006-01-26 and here's a picture of him with Motagua's training uniform http://www.elheraldo.hn/fotos/40788.jpg Chupu ( talk) 04:56, 29 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Here's the Honduran olympic squad for 2000 where he was part of.
http://www.zanziball.it/en/28/3b72.html and this is his "profile"
http://www.zanziball.it/en/4/61fc.html
Chupu (
talk) 05:08, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
reply
"
The result was Keep (non-admin closure). Nominator withdrew his nom after seeing googled sources provided here- please add them to the article, someone.:) The special, the random, the lovely Merkinsmum 21:37, 7 March 2008 (UTC)" reply
Also nominating Mani Subramanian, as his sole claim to notability appears to be this company.
No notability established and a quick google test shows minimal promise in the possibility of notability being established. Early revisions of the article read like a spamvertisement and the current version is only minimally better. In short, appears to fail
WP:CORP hard.
Y|yukichigai (
ramble
argue
check) 02:34, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
reply
I agree with Dhartung. There is plenty of information, contracts information about Keane. There are interviews with Mani Subramaniam, if you google and read through about top 25 hits! Kannan. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.100.23.182 ( talk) 23:21, 5 March 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. Whether the illustrator is mentioned in the book article is an editorial decision on that article, but it would seem reasonable to me to do so, in which case a redirect can be created to it. Ty 02:43, 5 March 2008 (UTC) reply
Non-notable illustrator. The only real notability is that she was the illustrator of a debut novel ( The People of Paper) but is this enough? She contributes to LA Record, a blog which in and of itself isn't really that notable. No outside biographical references regarding her except this article from a newspaper [55], but even then it is mainly about her experience with cancer. -- Ðysepsion † Speak your mind 02:19, 29 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Holdon on this one, may be notable.Cholga talK! 09:27, 29 February 2008 (UTC) reply
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tom_Freund
Furthermore, Harvery Mudd College lists in their notable alumni a young man who is (brace yourself) a former member of a less than noteworthy band.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Tapper
Ribs27 ( talk) 18:05, 29 February 2008 (UTC) Page's primary author reply
— Debarag7791 ( talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
The result was Speedy delete by User:Starblind, non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ( Broken clamshells• Otter chirps) 01:36, 29 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Likely a WP:HOAX, otherwise fails WP:N and WP:SOURCES Mr Senseless ( talk) 01:33, 29 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. Glass Cobra 06:51, 6 March 2008 (UTC) reply
fake rank -- sk-ru ( talk) 01:18, 29 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was keep per extensive improvements. Bearian ( talk) 01:49, 6 March 2008 (UTC) reply
Another pure WP:TRIVIA page that has no notability on its own. Any of actual significance belong in the main Buffy the Vampire Slayer article. This is not an appropriate sub-page (if that's its reason for being). AnmaFinotera ( talk) 01:16, 29 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete seems to have the consensus. Fram ( talk) 11:29, 6 March 2008 (UTC) reply
Listcruft and indiscriminate information. Ksy92003 ( talk) 00:53, 29 February 2008 (UTC) reply
I am also nominating the following related pages for the same reason:
The categories do not have all of the players whoever played in those positions and there are articles that are not made of former football players.
Want a cookie? Thanks -- Phbasketball6 ( talk) 21:11, 1 March 2008 (UTC) reply
Yes it is, Wikipedia is suppose to give out as much infomation of famous people, events, places, or other things and they are a lot of red links that were famous players in college and/or the professional level. -- Phbasketball6 ( talk) 23:01, 1 March 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy delete. нмŵוτн τ 19:43, 29 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Wikipedia is not a dictionary. SchuminWeb ( Talk) 01:00, 29 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Speedy delete by User:Black Kite, author indef blocked as well. Non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ( Broken clamshells• Otter chirps) 01:17, 29 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Contested prod. Zero google hits. Smells suspiciously like something made up in school one day. Roleplayer ( talk) 00:38, 29 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Speedy delete by User:Orangemike, non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ( Broken clamshells• Otter chirps) 01:00, 29 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Essentially an essay, full of OR and POV. Violates WP:NOT, WP:NOR, and WP:V Mr Senseless ( talk) 00:32, 29 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was merge to List of regional Burning Man events faithless (speak) 06:51, 7 March 2008 (UTC) reply
One more regional offshoot event of Burning Man. Not notable in its own right, no independent reliable sources to verify anything in the article, and I'm guessing that the attendance figure given (800,008) is a wee bit suspect. Seeks to promote, not inform. - Realkyhick ( Talk to me) 06:29, 20 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was merge to List of regional Burning Man events. Although no arguments have been advanced to keep this article as anything other than a merge, I have also considered arguments advanced in the linked AfD and the other nominations for deletion concerning Burning Man events. -- Moonriddengirl (talk) 15:16, 9 March 2008 (UTC) reply
Yes, officer, it's another regional offshoot event of Burning Man. Not notable in its own right, no independent reliable sources to verify anything in the article, appears to promote the event more than inform in an encyclopedic manner. Extra points, though, for burning down a model of the Roman Colosseum. - Realkyhick ( Talk to me) 06:38, 20 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Keep (non-admin closure), weak keep as it's said this group has been around 29 years, but it's also claimed there are WP:RS, I will give ou the benefit of the doubt, but please add them if you want this article to survive any future AfD. The special, the random, the lovely Merkinsmum 21:19, 7 March 2008 (UTC)" reply
Non-notable student association, article has no third-party or reliable sources. Agüeybaná 00:19, 29 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Whoa! Agueybana your comments are really discriminatory, and baseless, I recommend seeing the biographies of the members and leaders and verify if they are as you call "Puerto Rican-bred yanks and their mini-mes". Furthermore the proposal is based purely on political bias, and it is further proved by your statements. The importance of the organization is demonstrated by the article itself. Furthermore, the amount of people already involved and affected by it is evergrowing. Ill be adding soon a reference to the article from the island's major paper, which talks solely about the PRSSA. And about the Google thing, I do believe the page is showing I searched it right now, it is on the 3rd or 4th position. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.94.177.208 ( talk • contribs)
1-has withstood the test of time
2-its founders have become notables
3-greatly influenced the outcome of the 1980 election
4-is featured prominently in the bio's of several notables
5-today has a growing membership
6-is supported by at least three third-party reliable sources
Being a notable subject, worthy of the article originally authored by me (and I've written about 115+ different subjects, most Puerto Rico-related), it's a matter of improving the sourcing of the article, recognizing that sourcing electronically newspaper articles from the late 1970's and early 1980's about PRSSA, and its well-covered annual conventions) is rather difficult. Pr4ever ( talk) 03:57, 29 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Is El Nuevo Dia's website an unreliable source??? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.94.85.80 ( talk) 21:59, 29 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Guys, as the original author of this article to which several of you have provided added value, either by incorporating additional facts and insights or by calling attention to the article's shortcomings, it's time to focus our attention to improving the article and making it comply more with wiki policies through additional research and sourcing. My appreciation to all who have contributed, one way or the other, but now it's time to move on. Pr4ever ( talk) 21:30, 2 March 2008 (UTC) reply
"
"
The result was merge to List of regional Burning Man events. -- Moonriddengirl (talk) 15:11, 9 March 2008 (UTC) reply
Once again, another regional offshoot event of Burning Man. Not notable in its own right, no independent reliable sources to verify anything in the article. This event apparently isn't/wasn't even held after 2006. - Realkyhick ( Talk to me) 06:24, 20 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was merge to List of regional Burning Man events. -- Moonriddengirl (talk) 14:56, 9 March 2008 (UTC) reply
Another regional offshoot event of Burning Man. Not notable in its own right, no independent reliable sources to verify anything in the article, appears to promote the event more than inform in an encyclopedic manner. - Realkyhick ( Talk to me) 06:17, 20 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was merge to List of regional Burning Man events. -- Moonriddengirl (talk) 15:07, 9 March 2008 (UTC) reply
Stil another regional offshoot event of Burning Man. Not notable in its own right, no independent reliable sources to verify anything in the article, appears to promote the event more than inform in an encyclopedic manner. - Realkyhick ( Talk to me) 06:21, 20 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Non consensus Keep - although having come to that conclusion on the basis of procedure the strength of the arguments are more leaning to keep because evidence of notability seem to be provided by Eastman. -- VS talk 05:42, 8 March 2008 (UTC) reply
Non notable radio host. Mr Senseless ( talk) 18:08, 21 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Weak keep but needs some work Dreamspy ( talk) 21:45, 29 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Nomination withdrawn. Glass Cobra 06:40, 6 March 2008 (UTC) reply
Notability concerns, lack of coverage in reliable sources independent of the subject. Addhoc ( talk) 16:08, 29 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Delete Non-notable. Dreamspy ( talk) 21:44, 29 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Keep (non-admin closure) clear majority SilkTork * What's YOUR point? 18:10, 8 March 2008 (UTC) reply
Non-notable skate park. Georgia guy ( talk) 20:44, 29 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Why is it non-notable? It's 27,000 square feet. What do you consider notable? (BTW, I'm new to discussions, so please forgive me if I'm not following etiquette.) —Preceding unsigned comment added by AZard ( talk • contribs) 21:16, 29 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was withdrawn by nominator. Addhoc ( talk) 13:28, 1 March 2008 (UTC) reply
Notability concerns - lack of significant coverage in reliable sources independent of the subject. Addhoc ( talk) 23:30, 29 February 2008 (UTC) reply