The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The last AfD was conducted without much thought; this time, I say this article must be deleted because the content has been transferred to Payanangal Mudivathillai (no clutter), making this article redundant. Kailash29792(talk) 05:28, 18 March 2019 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ––
Redditaddict69(talk)(contribs) 07:45, 25 March 2019 (UTC)reply
Either redirect to Payanangal Mudivathillai as it could be viable search term or delete altogether per the nominator's reasoning.
Aoba47 (
talk) 01:39, 31 March 2019 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Vanamonde (
Talk) 04:24, 2 April 2019 (UTC)reply
Redirect If people really care that much about this song then redirecting is the only option.
Trillfendi (
talk) 16:52, 2 April 2019 (UTC)reply
Redirect to
Payanangal Mudivathillai. All of the important information in this article fits well there and covers the song sufficiently.
Schazjmd (
talk) 00:27, 3 April 2019 (UTC)reply
If content has been copied elsewhere then the list of authors needs to be kept to comply with the attribution provisions of our copyright licence. By far the simplest way to do this is to redirect this title to the target article.
Phil Bridger (
talk) 10:34, 3 April 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.