The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ‑Scottywong | gossip _ 16:57, 2 December 2015 (UTC) reply

Drongan United

Drongan United (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Club has only ever played in minor amateur competitions, therefore fails WP:FOOTYN. Also fails WP:N due to lack of significant coverage. Jellyman ( talk) 18:35, 24 November 2015 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Jellyman ( talk) 18:44, 24 November 2015 (UTC) reply

• Delete - no evidence of notability, fails GNG, winning the Amateur Cup not enough. Giant Snowman 20:12, 24 November 2015 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. Musa  Talk  23:34, 24 November 2015 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. —  Jkudlick  ^t c _s 20:06, 25 November 2015 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions. —  Jkudlick  ^t c _s 20:07, 25 November 2015 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. —  Jkudlick  ^t c _s 20:07, 25 November 2015 (UTC) reply

• Delete - Amateur club which has not participated in a national cup or at a level to meet WP:FOOTYN. Insufficient coverage to meet WP:GNG. —  Jkudlick  ^t c _s 20:08, 25 November 2015 (UTC) reply
  • Comment - they have competed in, and in fact won, the Scottish Amateur Cup, which is a national cup............ -- ChrisTheDude ( talk) 20:36, 25 November 2015 (UTC) reply
    • A national cup, not the national cup, and – as the name implies – a minor one not one open to professional teams. It doesn't confer notability. Jellyman ( talk) 21:59, 25 November 2015 (UTC) reply
      • ...and yet appearing in the FA Vase, the equivalent competition in England, is accepted as establishing notability? Hardly seems fair -- ChrisTheDude ( talk) 10:17, 26 November 2015 (UTC) reply
        • It's not really a direct equivalent. Clubs in the FA Vase are part of the pyramid system, and generally play in enclosed grounds, are semi-professional, etc. Amateur clubs in Scotland are not part of the senior system and generally play on public parks and the like. And you will find hardly anything by way of reliable sources for most of them, beyond routine coverage of results. Jellyman ( talk) 19:32, 29 November 2015 (UTC) reply
    • Cmt If this goes a few dozen Scottish 'junior' clubs will need to go too. SevcoFraudsters ( talk) 22:39, 25 November 2015 (UTC) reply
      • Yes, there's certainly an argument to be had there, but having said that, junior football is clearly of a higher grade than the amateur game. Jellyman ( talk) 19:32, 29 November 2015 (UTC) reply
• Delete Unreferenced article, no evidence of notability. Eldumpo ( talk) 21:37, 1 December 2015 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.